Management Of Tibial Fractures Research Articles

TIBIAL DIAPHYSEAL FRACTURE, PANORAMIC REVISION

Introduction: Tibial fractures are quite common injuries. Since the tibia has a subcutaneous location, it is more likely to show exposed fractures. Exposed fractures of the tibial diaphysis are serious injuries that can result in significant long-term disability if not managed correctly. Objective: to detail current information related to tibial diaphysis fractures, etiology, epidemiology, anamnesis, physical examination, assessment, treatment, differential diagnosis, prognosis and complications. Methodology: a total of 29 articles were analyzed in this review, including review and original articles, as well as clinical cases, of which 17 bibliographies were used because the other articles were not relevant for this study. The sources of information were PubMed, Google Scholar and Cochrane; the terms used to search for information in Spanish, Portuguese and English were: tibia fractures, osteosynthesis, tibia fracture, intramedullary nails, leg trauma, exposed fractures. Results: tibial diaphysis fractures present an incidence of 16.9 per 100,000 individuals per year, being more common in the male sex, with 21.5 per 100,000 individuals per year, compared to 12.3 per 100,000 in the female sex. The most common triggers in males of tibial diaphysis fractures are motor vehicle accident injuries and sports. Conclusions: It is important to recognize the management of tibial fractures since they have a relatively high incidence. It is not uncommon to encounter an exposed tibial diaphysis fracture, so it is essential to identify, as well as perform damage control and appropriate management. The individual should undergo a complete examination and it may be necessary to implement the trauma life support protocol. In this type of fracture it is crucial to assess the neurovascular situation. In addition, complementary examinations should be requested to allow the best diagnosis, classification and treatment of the injuries. The treatment of tibia diaphysis fractures will depend on the specific situation and the patient's condition; however, external fixators are usually used for damage control and later intramedullary nails are used. Tibial diaphysis fractures may be accompanied by compartment syndrome and other complications. KEY WORDS: trauma, fractures, tibia, treatment.

Management of Femoral and Tibial Shaft Fractures in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury Patients.

To compare outcomes and complications between non-operative and operative management of femur and tibia fractures in patients with paraplegia or quadriplegia from chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Three Level-1 Trauma centers. All adult patients with paraplegia or quadriplegia due to a chronic SCI with operative or nonoperative treatment of a femoral or tibial shaft fracture from 01/01/2009 through 12/31/2019 were included. Outcomes collected included range of motion, pain, return to baseline activity, extent of malunion and treatment complications (infection, pressure ulcers, nonunion, DVT/PE, stroke, amputation, death). Comparison between operative and nonoperative treatment were made for each outcome. Fifty-nine patients with acute lower extremity fracture in the setting of chronic SCI fulfilled inclusion criteria with a median age of 46 years in the operative group and 47 years in the non-operative group. Twelve patients (70.6%) in the nonoperative group were male with 32 (76.2%) male patients in the operative group. Forty-six patients (78%) presented as low energy trauma. Differences were seen between operative and non-operative management for pressure ulcers (19% vs 52.9%, p=0.009) and mean VAS pain score at first follow-up (1.19 vs 3.3, p=0.03). No difference was seen for rates of infection, nonunion, DVT/PE, stroke, amputation, death, return to baseline activity, and range of motion. Tibial and femoral shaft fractures commonly resulted from low energy mechanisms in patients with chronic SCI. Operative treatment seemed to decrease morbidity in these patients via lowered rates of pressure ulcers and decreased pain compared to non-operative management. Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Classification and management of tibial tubercle avulsion fractures in children.

Fractures of the tibial tubercle are an uncommon injury, constituting 0.4-2.7% of all epiphyseal injuries. They occur in the adolescent age group, often during sports such as basketball and football. They are often classified using the modified Ogden classification. Understanding the anatomy and pathophysiology is essential in the management of these fractures, to predict complications and counsel patients and families on care. Tibial tubercle fractures generally have favourable overall outcomes when the correct treatment modality is chosen, with a high rate of union and a 98% return to preinjury activities. This article provides a guide for doctors on the classification and management of these injuries, to ensure that appropriate treatment is given according to current literature and best practice.

Classification and management of tibial tubercle avulsion fractures in children

Abstract Fractures of the tibial tubercle are an uncommon injury, constituting 0.4–2.7% of all epiphyseal injuries. They occur in the adolescent age group, often during sports such as basketball and football. They are often classified using the modified Ogden classification. Understanding the anatomy and pathophysiology is essential in the management of these fractures, to predict complications and counsel patients and families on care. Tibial tubercle fractures generally have favourable overall outcomes when the correct treatment modality is chosen, with a high rate of union and a 98% return to preinjury activities. This article provides a guide for doctors on the classification and management of these injuries, to ensure that appropriate treatment is given according to current literature and best practice.

How Effective is Fibula Pro Tibia Plating in Treatment of Distal Tibial Fractures: A Pilot Study.

Despite recent advances, management of distal tibial fractures is challenging, with high rate of complications. Fibula pro tibia plating technique fixes fibula and tibia together, via laterally placed fibular plate without disturbing the tibial soft tissue sleeve. We contemplated this pilot study to assess effectiveness of fibula pro tibia plating in management of distal tibia fibula fractures. A total of 30 patients with distal tibia fibula fractures with fracture line extending within 5cm from tibial plafond were managed with fibula pro tibia plating, with or without minimal articular fixation. Outcome evaluation was done by union, union time, alignment and functional outcome as assessed by AOFAS score. Mean age in the series was 39.4 years with male to female ratio of 3:2. Mean duration of surgery, blood loss and C arm exposure were 79 minutes (range 52 to 98min), 80ml (range 62 to 102ml) and 48 shoots (range 36 to 81 shoots), respectively. All fractures united in mean union time of 10.2 weeks (range 9 to 14 weeks) with acceptable alignment in all the patients except one. Mean AOFAS score was 86.3 (range 70 to 93) with 29 patients having good to excellent outcome. One patient had varus malunion and in one case infection was seen. Fibula pro tibia plating can be successfully used to manage complex distal tibia fractures which leaves the soft tissue and periosteal sleeve undisturbed, thus avoiding wound related problems and leading to early union.

THE ACUTE MANAGEMENT OF PILON FRACTURES (ENFORCE) STUDY: A TRAINEE-LED NATIONAL COLLABORATIVE EVALUATION OF PRACTICE

IntroductionTibial Pilon fractures are potentially limb threatening, yet standards of care are lacking from BOFAS and the BOA. The mantra of “span, scan, plan” describes staged management with external fixation to allow soft tissue resuscitation, followed by a planning CT-scan. Our aim was to evaluate how Tibial Pilon fractures are acutely managed.MethodsENFORCE was a multi-centre retrospective observational study of the acute management of partial and complete articular Tibial Pilon fractures over a three-year period. Mechanism, imaging, fracture classification, time to fracture reduction and cast, and soft tissue damage control details were determined.Results656 patients (670 fractures) across 27 centres were reported. AO fracture classifications were: partial articular (n=294) and complete articular (n=376). Initial diagnostic imaging mobilities were: plain radiographs (n=602) and CT-scan (n=54), with all but 38 cases having a planning CT-scan. 526 fractures had a cast applied in the Emergency Department (91 before radiological diagnosis), with the times taken to obtain post cast imaging being: mean 2.7 hours, median 2.3 hours, range 28 mins – 14 hours). 35% (102/294) of partial articular and 57% (216/376) of complete articular (length unstable) fractures had an external fixator applied, all of which underwent a planning CT-scan. Definitive management consisted of: open reduction internal fixation (n=495), fine wire frame (n=86), spanning external fixator (n=25), intramedullary nail (n=25), other (n=18).ConclusionThe management of Tibial Pilon fractures is variable, with prolonged delays in obtaining post cast reduction radiographs, and just over half of length unstable complete articular fractures being managed with the gold standard “span, scan, plan” staged soft tissue resuscitation. A BOFAS endorsed BOAST (British Orthopaedic Association Standard for Trauma) for Tibial Pilon fractures is suggested for standardisation of the acute management of these potentially limb threatening injuries, together with setting them apart from more straightforward ankle fractures.

Intramedullary nailing at different distal tibial fracture levels: A biomechanical study.

Distal tibial fractures remains a significant challenge in orthopedic trauma surgery. As the fracture level approaches the joint, alternative fixation options instead of intramedullary nailing (IMN) come to the fore. The present study aimed to assess the biomechanical stability of IMN at different distal tibial fracture levels and the number of locking screws required. Using a total of 21 sawbone models, 3 different tibial fracture levels (3, 4.5, and 6 cm proximally to the talocrural joint) were created and the fractures were fixed using 2, 3, or 4 distal locking screws. A single compression force at a speed of 30 mm/min with a maximum force of 800 Newton and a cyclic compression force of 60 cycles at a speed of 60 mm/min was applied to all tibia models. The applied weight and displacements from the fracture lines were recorded and evaluated. There was no statistically significant difference in fixation with 2 distal locking screws in groups 1, 2, and 3 (single test P =.9689) (cyclic test P =.8050). Therefore, if 2 distal screws are used, the fracture level does not affect the strength of fixation. In fractures located 6 cm proximal to the talocrural joint, all 4 holes of the nail can be used to insert screws, which provides a stronger fixation. When 2 screws are used, a statistically weaker fixation is obtained than with 3 or 4 screws. However, there is no significant difference between using 3 or 4 screws. Our findings support the use of IMN with 2 distal locking screws as a viable option for the management of distal tibial fractures. We found that it provides sufficient fixation regardless of the fracture level, suggesting that there is no need to choose an alternative fixation technique due to concerns of inadequate fixation as the fracture line moves distally. In cases where more stable fixation is desired, an additional locking screw can be used, but the potential increase in procedure and fluoroscopy time should be considered.

Exchange Nailing vs Plate over Nail and Graft in the Management of Non-United Proximal Tibial Fractures after Interlocking Nail Fixation in Proximal Tibial Fractures

Exchange Nailing vs Plate over Nail and Graft in the Management of Non-United Proximal Tibial Fractures after Interlocking Nail Fixation in Proximal Tibial Fractures

Primary Arthrodesis with Retrograde Hindfoot Nail for Elderly Patients with Tibia Pilon Fractures and Psychiatric Illness.

Management of tibial pilon fracture in elderly patients with psychiatric illness remains challenging for orthopedic doctors because of patients' poor bone quality and inability for self-care. This study aimed to ascertain the viability and reliability of primary arthrodesis by using retrograde hindfoot nail for these difficult cases. We retrospectively reviewed eight elderly consecutive patients (age older than 65 years) with tibial pilon fractures and psychiatric illness from January of 2012 to December of 2019 in our institute. Primary tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with retrograde hindfoot nail was used as a definitive procedure. The bone union time, wound complication rate, ankle alignment, necessity for narcotic agents, and ambulation status were evaluated. The average length of follow-up was 22.25 months (range, 15-36 months). Additional bone grafting surgery was performed for one patient because of fusion-site nonunion 6 months postoperatively. Another patient required debridement and removal of posterior calcaneal screw because of implant prominence and local infection. Osseous union with angular deformity less than 10° was achieved in all patients finally. The average bone union time was 6.6 months (range, 4-12 months). In terms of walking ability, six patients were capable of outdoor ambulation (classes 2 and 3). Two patients required oral pain medication at the final visit. The current study involved only a small number of patients, and two of the eight cases encountered undesired complications (one local infection and one bone nonunion); however, we believe that our method may serve as a valuable alternative for the treatment of tibial pilon fractures in elderly patients with psychiatric illness, considering the specificity of this fragile population.

The Clinical Application of Double Taylor Spatial Frame in Segmental Tibial Fracture.

Multi-planar external fixation has been used for the management of segmental tibial fractures with severe soft tissue injuries. However, fewer specialized studies have been reported. The primary aim of this study was to describe our experience of treating fractures of this type using the Taylor Spatial Frame and Ilizarov external fixation methods. We retrospectively analyzed 33 patients with segmental tibial fracture treated at our institution between January 2016 and December 2020. The patients were divided into double Taylor Spatial Frame (D-TSF) and Ilizarov groups based on the external fixation structure. Baseline demographic data included sex, age, injury side and cause, open or closed fracture, time from injury to surgery, complications, and external frame removal and fracture healing time. The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) was measured from preoperative, immediate postoperative, and final follow-up full-length X-rays of bilateral lower limbs. We determined the degree of deviation in the HKA by calculating the difference between the measured angle and the ideal value of 180°; the absolute value was used to assess recovery of the lower limb force line. At the final follow-up, Johner-Wruhs tibial fracture outcome criteria (J-W TFOC) were used to classify the postoperative function of the affected limb as excellent, good, moderate, or poor. Count data were analyzed with the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test; the Mann-Whitney U test was used for rank data. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of sex, age, side of injury, cause of injury, closed or open fracture, or time between injury and surgery, which indicates that the groups were comparable (p > 0.05). A statistically significant difference was observed in external frame removal and fracture healing time between the D-TSF and Ilizarov groups (36.24 ± 8.34 vs 45.42 ± 10.21 weeks, p = 0.009; 33.33 ± 8.21 vs 42.00 ± 9.78 weeks, p = 0.011). The Johner-Wruhs criteria were used to assess the function of the affected limb, the D-TSF group performed better in correcting the lower limb force line than the Ilizarov group. A statistically significant difference in terms of excellent ratings was observed between the two groups (18/2/1/0 vs 5/5/1/1, p = 0.010). Postoperative follow-up X-rays demonstrated a significant improvement in the HKA in both groups immediately after surgery and at the final follow-up compared to the angle before surgery. At the final follow-up, a statistically significant difference was observed in the degree of deviation in the HKA between the two groups (1.58° ± 0.84° vs 2.37° ± 1.00°, p = 0.023). The D-TSF treatment is associated with minimal secondary damage to soft tissue, a straightforward and minimally invasive procedure, multiplanar stable fracture fixation, and optimization of fracture alignment and lower limb force lines, therefore, it is highly effective therapeutic option for segmental tibial fracture.

THE BIGGER, THE BETTER? TWO-RING CIRCULAR FRAMES AND DURATION OF TREATMENT IN THE MANAGEMENT OF TIBIAL FRACTURES: A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

IntroductionFrame configuration for the management of complex tibial fractures is highly variable and is dependent not only on fracture pattern and soft tissue condition but also surgeon preference. The optimal number of rings to use when designing a frame remains uncertain. Traditionally, larger, stiffer constructs with multiple rings per segment were thought to offer optimal conditions for bone healing, however, the concept of reverse dynamisation questions this approach.Materials & MethodsWe compared clinical outcomes in 302 consecutive patients with tibial fractures treated in our unit with either a two-ring circular frame or a three-or-more-ring (3+) frame. The primary outcome measure was time spent in frame. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of malunion and the need for further surgical procedures to achieve bone union. The groups were evenly matched for age, co-morbidities, energy of injury mechanism, fracture classification, post-treatment alignment and presence of an open fracture.ResultsThe mean time in frame was 168 days for the 2-ring group and 200 days for the 3+ rings group (p=0.003). No significant difference was found in the rate of malunion (p=0.428) or the requirement for secondary surgical intervention to achieve union (p=0.363). No significant difference in time in frame was found between individual surgeons.ConclusionsThis study finds that 2-ring frame constructs are a reliable option associated with significantly shorter duration of treatment and no increase in rates of adverse outcomes compared with larger, more complex frame configurations. Although this study cannot identify the underlying cause of the difference in treatment time between frame designs, it is possible that differences in mechanical stability lead to a more favourable strain environment for fracture healing in the 2-ring group.

Bone union and mobility outcomes for reconstructed open tibial fractures: a plastic surgical experience from a major trauma center.

The goal in open tibial fracture management is to achieve a united tibia in an extremity that allows pain free mobilization. The objective of this study was to assess factors that lead to this functional outcome in lower limb reconstruction, from a plastic surgical perspective. The Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery lower limb database at a tertiary trauma hospital was searched for open tibial injuries from February 2015 to March 2020. The nature and severity of injury, timing and details of all operations including reconstructions were collected prospectively. Mobility including gait aids, pain, and complications were retrospectively collected. Union was assessed in two ways, depending on fracture location. Metaphyseal and diaphyseal tibial fractures were provided mRUST scores (union defined as RUST > 13) and epiphyseal tibial fractures were categorically classified as "united" or "non-union" by two independent radiologists. During the five-year study period there were 148 open leg injuries in the database. Twenty-one patients underwent a primary amputation due to severity of their initial injury. One hundred patients underwent primary limb salvage. Sixty-one patients in the limb salvage group achieved primary tibial union with a mean follow-up time of 19.4 months post injury. Twenty-three additional patients were confirmed to subsequently unite. Patient who achieved union were more likely to mobilise without gait aids. In this study definitive external fixation and soft tissue infection were both associated with higher rates of non-union. Longer times to soft tissue reconstruction was not associated with an increase in acute soft tissue complications. More importantly bone union, pain and mobility did not decline. After undertaking a primary limb salvage pathway for 100 patients, the ultimate tibial fracture union rate was 84% and the confirmed ambulation rate was 96%.

Comparative Study of Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing and Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis for Distal Tibia Extra-Articular Fractures

Management of distal tibial extra-articular fractures presents a significant challenge in orthopedic practice due to their complex anatomical features and variable fracture patterns. Surgical intervention plays a crucial role in achieving stable fixation and optimal functional outcomes. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness between minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis and intramedullary nailing for the management of distal tibial extra-articular fractures. This was a prospective observational study that was conducted in the Department of Orthopedics, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical College, Hospital (BSMMCH), Faridpur, Bangladesh from January 2021 to December 2022. Total 24 patients having a fracture of the distal third of the tibia were enrolled in this study as the study subjects. Total patients were divided into two groups. In group A, 12 patients underwent minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) and in group B, 12 patients underwent intramedullary nailing (IMN). A random selection method was used in sample selection. According to Olerud Molander’s score, Excellent, Good and Fair results were found in 50%, 50%, and 0% of the group A patients respectively. On the other hand, those results were found in 42%, 50% and 8% of group B patients respectively. Although both minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis and intramedullary nailing procedures are effective in managing distal tibial extra-articular fractures, considering excellent union rate, low blood loss and remarkable Olerud Molander’s score, MIPPO may be considered as the better option. Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Med. Coll. J. 2023;2(2):92-96.

Ambulatory surgical management of most displaced tibial tubercle fractures in children is safe and efficient.

The purpose of this study is to compare the outcome of patients with displaced tibial tubercle fractures treated surgically who spent one or more nights in the hospital after surgery with that of patients treated in an ambulatory setting with no perioperative hospitalization. We hypothesized that tibial tubercle fractures have a low rate of complications and that most patients do well without an overnight hospital stay for observation. We retrospectively reviewed all pediatric tibial tubercle fractures treated operatively by a single surgeon over a 13.5-year period. Fractures treated in an inpatient setting, defined as at least one night of overnight hospitalization postoperatively, were compared with fractures treated in an ambulatory setting with no perioperative hospitalization. Seventy-one fractures in 70 patients were analyzed. All fractures were treated with open reduction and internal fixation with unicortical screws. Thirty-five fractures (49.3%) were fixed in an ambulatory setting, while 36 (50.7%) were inpatient. There were no significant differences between inpatient demographics (age, gender, body mass index, fracture type). Average operative time was significantly longer in the inpatient group compared with the ambulatory group (97.8 min versus 58.8 min, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between inpatient and ambulatory groups (25.0% versus 11.4%, p = 0.22). No cases of compartment syndrome were noted. Ambulatory surgical treatment of select tibial tubercle fractures with same-day discharge is safe and efficient. Not all patients with surgically treated tibial tubercle fractures need to stay overnight in the hospital.

Comparison between Exercise Program-Foot Orthoses Treatment and Exercise Program Alone after Pilon Fracture Surgery: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

The management of tibial pilon fractures is challenging and often leads to complications and limitations in ankle function. The study aims to investigate myotonometric parameters and muscle strength of ankle muscles, as well as gait pattern and balance among patients following surgical treatment of pilon fractures. The randomized controlled study will analyze the differences between the patients who will follow a 3-month physical exercise program and will wear customized foot orthoses (i.e., customized orthotic arch support insoles) versus patients who will attend only the physical exercise program. For each group, at least 21 patients will be required. The assessment involves four different testing procedures: myotonometry (anterior tibialis, medial and lateral gastrocnemius, and longus peroneus assessed using MyotonPRO), muscle strength testing (ankle dorsiflexors, plantar flexors, and peroneal muscles assessed using MicroFET2 dynamometer), analysis of gait parameters (using Scheinworks treadmill), and double-leg and single-leg balance tests (using K-Force plate). After 3 months, the assessments will record which of the two treatments (physical exercise program with or without wearing customized foot orthoses) has better outcomes in regaining ankle muscle properties and tone, as well as the restoration of gait and balance.

Stabilization of Tibial Fractures at Risk of Complications With the Bactiguard Intramedullary Nail: Early to Medium Results With a Novel Metal-Coated Device.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and early clinical results from the use of a novel, noble metal-coated titanium tibial nail for the definite stabilization of tibial shaft fractures at risk of developing complications. This is a retrospective case series with prospectively collected data. Level I Trauma Centre in the United Kingdom. Thirty-one patients who were managed with the Bactiguard-coated Natural Nail and achieved a minimum of a 12-month follow-up. The main outcomes of this study were the incidence of adverse events (related to implant safety), complications (particularly infection), and reinterventions. Thirty-one patients with a mean age of 41.6 years were included in this study. Active heavy smokers or intravenous drug users were 25.8% and 9.7% of them were diabetic. Five fractures were open while 13 had concomitant soft-tissue involvement (Tscherne grade 1 or 2). Twenty-seven patients healed with no further intervention in a mean time of 3.3 months. Three patients developed nonunion and required further intervention. The overall union rate was 96.7%. One patient developed deep infection after union (infection incidence 3.2%). Six patients (6/31; [19.3%]) required reinterventions [2 for the treatment of nonunion, 3 for removal of screws soft-tissue irritation, and 1 for the management of infection). The management of tibial shaft fractures with a noble metal-coated titanium tibial nail demonstrates encouraging outcomes. Further studies are desirable to gather more evidence in the performance of this innovative implant. Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Case Report: Effectiveness of physiotherapy rehabilitation in a patient with compound grade IIIC proximal third tibia fracture along with vascular injury

The proximal metaphyseal region of the bone is thought to be the location of fractures of the proximal tibia. The surgical management of proximal tibial shaft fractures and high-energy bicondylar tibial plateau fractures is still challenging . Supra-cutaneous plating, also known as a locking compression plate, has been promoted as a crucial technique in the management of challenging reconstructive scenarios since it has shown to be adjustable, concealed, and well-accepted by patients. Physical therapy rehabilitation is critically necessary for a full recovery from a range of orthopaedic issues. Physical therapy rehabilitation is a vital step in the healing process for patients with lower limb fractures. In our study , we rehabilitated a patient with Compound grade IIIC proximal third tibia fracture right side managed with Closed reduction external fixator application and vascular repair along with proximal fibula fracture. Through this study, we developed a physiotherapy rehabilitation protocol that was very helpful for these patients, produced positive results, and served to enhance the patient's quality of life.

DISTAL THIRD TIBIAL FRACTURE SURGERY WITH FIBULAR FIXATION: IS IT NECESSARY FOR UNION AND ALIGNMENT?

Objective&#x0D; The management of distal third tibial fractures remain&#x0D; controversial. The aim of the present study was to&#x0D; evaluate whether concurrent fibular fixation changes&#x0D; union rates and aids in alignment in the case of distal&#x0D; third tibia fractures.&#x0D; Material and Method&#x0D; The study included 106 distal third tibia fracture&#x0D; operation cases in which the distance from the fracture&#x0D; to the plafond was between 3-12 cm at a single centre&#x0D; between January 2016 and June 2020. The patients&#x0D; were divided into three groups according to the status&#x0D; of the fibula: Group 1 (without fibular fixation with&#x0D; the presence of a fibula fracture, 47 cases), Group&#x0D; 2 (concurrent fibular fixation with the presence of a&#x0D; fibular fracture, 38 cases) and Group 3 (intact fibula,&#x0D; 21 cases). All fibular fixation surgeries were performed&#x0D; with locked plates (LCP) and tibial fixation with either&#x0D; LCP or intramedullary nailing (IMN). The primary&#x0D; outcome measures were union and alignment. Age,&#x0D; gender, AO classification, fibula fracture location,&#x0D; presence of an open fracture, implant type and time&#x0D; delay for surgery were also assessed.&#x0D; Results&#x0D; None of the variables except the presence of an open&#x0D; fracture was significant for the union rates or alignment.&#x0D; The union rate was significantly less if there was an&#x0D; open fracture in the concurrent fibular fixation group&#x0D; (p

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Outcomes After Management of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Tibial Avulsion Fractures.

There is no consensus regarding the management of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fractures and the expected outcomes after treatment. To systematically review clinical outcomes and complications after management of tibial-sided avulsion fractures of the PCL. Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. A literature search of Scopus, PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials was performed in accordance with the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Included were studies with evidence levels 1 to 4 that reported clinical outcomes after treatment of PCL tibial-sided avulsion fractures in humans. The quality of the included studies was performed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria. A meta-analysis was performed for patient-reported outcome measures using random-effects modeling with 95% CIs. A total of 58 studies published between 1999 and 2022 were identified. The mean MINORS score was 9.90 ± 4.12, indicating overall low-quality evidence with high risk of bias. The studies comprised 1440 patients (mean age, 32.59 ± 5.69 years; 75.2% males) with a mean follow-up of 26.9 ± 19.6 months (range, 5.3-126 months). Most patients were treated with open surgery (63.6%), followed by arthroscopic surgery (29.7%) and nonoperative treatment (6.7%). All patients reported significant posttreatment improvement in both subjective and objective outcomes (P < .05 for all). Arthroscopic surgery was associated with lower postoperative posterior tibial translation compared with open surgery (range, 0.6-3.2 vs 1.7-3.1 mm), greater preoperative to postoperative improvement in Lysholm score (54.6 vs 48.8; P < .0001), higher postoperative Tegner score (6.64 ± 1.03 vs 6.14 ± 2.29; P = .0448), and a higher rate of return to sport (100% vs 89.5%; P = .009). Nonoperative management was associated with a significantly lower fracture union rate (87% vs 99.1%; P < .0001) and greater postoperative side-to-side posterior translation (4.9 ± 4.3 mm) when compared with operative management. Although nonoperative and surgical management of PCL tibial avulsion fractures resulted in high rates of fracture union and improvement in functional outcome scores and a low incidence of complications, nonoperative treatment yielded a high side-to-side posterior displacement (>4 mm) with a lower rate of fracture union compared to surgical treatment.

Arthroscopic Tibio-talar Calcaneal Nailing for Complex Distal Third and Intra-Articular Tibia Fractures

Distal tibia fractures are complex injuries with a high complication rate and unclear guidelines regarding operative timing for reduction and fixation. A tibial plafond fracture, or pilon fracture, is a fracture of the distal end of the tibia, often associated with complex comminuted fragments and surrounding soft-tissue injury compromise. Appropriate management of distal tibial and pilon fractures remains a challenge and existing research proves current surgical approaches have poor clinical outcomes. We propose that primary hindfoot arthrodesis using a tibio-talar calcaneal nail may be used as a successful method for treating complex distal tibial and pilon fractures, notably in those with coexisting medical comorbidities (diabetes, neuropathy, dementia, and compromised soft-tissue). The overall perioperative complication rate in this high-risk cohort may be reduced given a lesser invasive method for fixation. We hypothesize that primary hindfoot arthrodesis using an arthroscopic preparation and tibio-talar calcaneal nail for periarticular ankle trauma is a safe and effective surgical approach with optimal fracture alignment and stability. Level of Evidence: Level V.