Acute Postoperative Pain Management Research Articles

Postoperative pain score does not correlate with injury severity in isolated tibial plateau fractures.

Appropriate management of acute postoperative pain is critical for patient care and practice management. The purpose of this study was to determine whether postoperative pain score correlates with injury severity in tibial plateau fractures. A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was completed at a single academic level one trauma center. All adult patients treated operatively for tibial plateau fractures who did not have concomitant injuries, previous injury to the ipsilateral tibia or knee joint, compartment syndrome, inadequate follow-up, or perioperative regional anesthesia were included (n = 88). The patients were split into groups based on the AO/OTA fracture classification (B-type vs C-type), energy mechanism, number of surgical approaches, need for temporizing external fixation, and operative time as a proxy for injury severity. The primary outcome measure was the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score (average in the first 24h, highest in the first 24h, two- and six-week postoperative appointments). Psychosocial and comorbid factors that may affect pain were studied and controlled for (history of diabetes, neuropathy, anxiety, depression, PTSD, and previous opioid prescription). Additionally, opioid use in the postoperative period was studied and controlled for (morphine milligram equivalents (MME) administered in the first 24h, discharge MME/day, total discharge MME, and opioid refills). VAS scores were similar between groups at each time point except the two-week postoperative time point. At the two-week postoperative time point, the absolute difference between the groups was 1.3. The groups were significantly different in several injury and surgical variables as expected, but were similar in all demographic, comorbid, and postoperative opioid factors. There was no clinical difference in postoperative pain between AO/OTA 41B and 41C tibial plateau fractures. This supports the idea of providers uncoupling nociception and pain in postoperative patients. Providers should consider minimizing extended opioid use, even in more severe injuries.

Analgesic Potential Comparison Between Piperine-Combined Curcumin Patch and Non-Piperine Curcumin Patch: A Pragmatic Trial on Post-Cleft Lip/Palate Surgery Pediatric Patients.

Despite its well-acknowledged analgesic potential, curcumin's low bioavailability has been recognized. Piperine, a substance naturally contained in pepper, has been known for its effect on increasing curcumin bioavailability. To investigate the analgesic potential of curcumin and piperine addition to curcumin patch used as adjuvant therapy in the management of acute postoperative orofacial pain. This pragmatic trial recruited 75 patients that underwent oromaxillofacial surgery at Unpad Dental Hospital, Bandung, Indonesia. Research participants were randomly assigned to three different groups: the first group that did not receive any intervention other than the post-operative standard treatment (POST), the second group that received POST and non-piperine curcumin patch, and the third group that received POST and piperine-combined curcumin patch. Participants' pain intensity was evaluated by using the face, leg, activity, cry, and consolability (FLACC) pain scale and salivary prostaglandin-E2 (PGE2) level for two-time points, which were eight hours apart. All data were gathered and analyzed to compare the within and between-group differences. Within groups comparison of the FLACC scores for two evaluation points showed significant differences for all groups (p < 0.01). For salivary PGE2 analysis, a comparison of the non-piperine group to the piperine group also showed significant results. Yet, when all three groups were compared, regardless of the differences, the results were not statistically significant. Despite of the proven efficacy of curcumin patch, the addition of piperine to the curcumin patch in the current study did not provide any significant effects. Further investigation is of importance.

Biopolymeric 3D printed implantable scaffolds as a potential adjuvant treatment for acute post-operative pain management

ABSTRACT Background Pain is characterized as a major symptom induced by tissue damage occurring from surgical procedures, whose potency is being experienced subjectively, while current pain relief strategies are not always efficient in providing individualized treatment. 3D printed implantable devices hold the potential to offer a precise and customized medicinal approach, targeting both tissue engineering and drug delivery. Research design and methods Polycaprolactone (PCL) and PCL – chitosan (CS) composite scaffolds loaded with procaine (PRC) were fabricated by bioprinting. Geometrical features including dimensions, pattern, and infill of the scaffolds were mathematically optimized and digitally determined, aiming at developing structurally uniform 3D printed models. Printability studies based on thermal imaging of the bioprinting system were performed, and physicochemical, surface, and mechanical attributes of the extruded scaffolds were evaluated. The release rate of PRC was examined at different time intervals up to 1 week. Results Physicochemical stability and mechanical integrity of the scaffolds were studied, while in vitro drug release studies revealed that CS contributes to the sustained release dynamic of PRC. Conclusions The printing extrusion process was capable of developing implantable devices for a local and sustained delivery of PRC as a 7-day adjuvant regimen in post-operative pain management.

Acute postoperative pain management techniques, their efficacy and complications after major gastrointestinal and hepato-pancreato-biliary cancer surgeries: An observational study.

Patients undergoing major gastrointestinal (GI) surgery including hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgeries have large incisions, which cause severe acute postoperative pain that, if untreated, is associated with a higher incidence of postoperative morbidity and delayed recovery. Our study included all patients who underwent elective major upper GI and HPB surgeries from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2018. The patients were divided into two groups: the epidural and the non-epidural group. The average and worst pain scores at rest and movement were compared between both groups. We also studied the effect of pain relief in the two groups and associated postoperative outcomes, resumption of feeding, ambulation, hospital stay and intensive care unit stay. A total of 566 patients were included in the study, out of which 490 received epidurals, and the rest, 76, belonged to the non-epidural group (transversus abdominis plane, rectus sheath block or no regional analgesia technique). The median average pain score at rest and movement was 2.0 and 3.0, respectively, in the epidural and non-epidural groups. The postoperative outcomes showed no statistical difference. The epidural group and the non-epidural group had similar pain scores, and the postoperative outcomes were also comparable.

Perioperative pain management after scapular tip free flap harvesting for head and neck reconstruction using mini-catheters to inject the local anesthetic.

Although functional and esthetic results after the use of a scapular tip free flap (STFF) in head and neck reconstruction, and the related donor-site morbidity, have been extensively described, data regarding acute postoperative donor-site pain management are lacking. Purpose of this study is to explore the use of mini-catheters to administer local anesthetics for donor-site pain management after reconstruction using STFF. Patients who underwent head and neck reconstruction using a STFF were prospectively enrolled and, through a perineural catheter placed in the donor site during the surgical procedure, a bolus of chirochaine was injected before the patient regained consciousness and at 8, 16, and 24 h postoperatively. Before and 40 min after each dose administration, donor-site pain on a numerical rating scale (NRS; 0-10) was evaluated. Study population consisted of 20 patients (40-88 years). At 8 h, the pain scores before and after the injection were 0-10 (mean 3.35) and 0-5 (mean 1.25), respectively. At 16 h, the pain scores before and after the injection were 0-8 (mean 2.55) and 0-4 (mean 0.55), respectively. At 24 h, the pain scores before and after the injection were 0-8 (mean 1.30) and 0-4 (mean 0.30), respectively. Statistical analysis confirmed a significant difference between the pain scores before and after administration at 8, 16, and 24 h (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.003, respectively). Mini-catheters for local anesthetic administration represent an effective strategy for pain control after STFF harvesting for head and neck reconstruction.

GAMBARAN MANAJEMEN NYERI AKUT PASKA OPERASI PADA PASIEN YANG MENJALANI TINDAKAN OPERASI ELEKTIF DI RSU HAJI MEDAN

Profile of nutritional status and eating behavior of doctors in their work To determine the description of acute post-operative pain management in patients undergoing elective surgery at RSU Haji Medan. This research is a descriptive study with a cross-sectional research design on elective post-operative patients. In this study, the number of respondents who participated was 66 people, with the largest gender being 37 people (56.1%), the average age was 40 years, and the majority of respondents were Javanese, namely 25 people (37.9%) . The highest preoperative pain intensity was moderate pain, amounting to 41 people (62.1%). The majority of pain intensity in the first 8 hours after surgery was moderate pain, in the second 8 hours the majority was mild pain and in the third 8 hours the majority was no pain. The majority of post-operative analgesic regimens use a combination of intravenous injection of ketorolac 30 mg and paracetamol 1 gram per 8 hours. The majority of the side effects felt by respondents after surgery were nausea.

Ibuprofen for acute postoperative pain in children.

Children often require pain management following surgery to avoid suffering. Effective pain management has consequences for healing time and quality of life. Ibuprofen, a frequently used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) administered to children, is used to treat pain and inflammation in the postoperative period. 1) To assess the efficacy and safety of ibuprofen (any dose) for acute postoperative pain management in children compared with placebo or other active comparators. 2) To compare ibuprofen administered at different doses, routes (e.g. oral, intravenous, etc.), or strategies (e.g. as needed versus as scheduled). We used standard Cochrane search methods. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and trials registries in August 2023. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in children aged 17 years and younger, treated for acute postoperative or postprocedural pain, that compared ibuprofen to placebo or any active comparator. We included RCTs that compared different administration routes, doses of ibuprofen and schedules. We adhered to standard Cochrane methods for data collection and analysis. Our primary outcomes were pain relief reported by the child, pain intensity reported by the child, adverse events, and serious adverse events. We present results using risk ratios (RR) and standardised mean differences (SMD), with the associated confidence intervals (CI). We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence. We included 43 RCTs that enroled 4265 children (3935 children included in this review). We rated the overall risk of bias at the study level as high or unclear for 37 studies that had one or several unclear or high risk of bias judgements across the domains. We judged six studies as having a low risk of bias across all domains. Ibuprofen versus placebo (35 RCTs) No studies reported pain relief reported by the child or a third party, or serious adverse events. Ibuprofen probably reduces child-reported pain intensity less than two hours postintervention compared to placebo (SMD -1.12, 95% CI -1.39 to -0.86; 3 studies, 259 children; moderate-certainty evidence). Ibuprofen may reduce child-reported pain intensity, two hours to less than 24 hours postintervention (SMD -1.01, 95% CI -1.24 to -0.78; 5 studies, 345 children; low-certainty evidence). Ibuprofen may result in little to no difference in adverse events compared to placebo (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.23; 5 studies, 384 children; low-certainty evidence). Ibuprofen versus paracetamol (21 RCTs) No studies reported pain relief reported by the child or a third party, or serious adverse events. Ibuprofen likely reduces child-reported pain intensity less than two hours postintervention compared to paracetamol (SMD -0.42, 95% CI -0.82 to -0.02; 2 studies, 100 children; moderate-certainty evidence). Ibuprofen may slightly reduce child-reported pain intensity two hours to 24 hours postintervention (SMD -0.21, 95% CI -0.40 to -0.02; 6 studies, 422 children; low-certainty evidence). Ibuprofen may result in little to no difference in adverse events (0 events in each group; 1 study, 44 children; low-certainty evidence). Ibuprofen versus morphine (1 RCT) No studies reported pain relief or pain intensity reported by the child or a third party, or serious adverse events. Ibuprofen likely results in a reduction in adverse events compared to morphine (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.83; risk difference (RD) -0.25, 95% CI -0.40 to -0.09; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 4; 1 study, 154 children; moderate-certainty evidence). Ibuprofen versus ketorolac (1 RCT) No studies reported pain relief or pain intensity reported by the child, or serious adverse events. Ibuprofen may result in a reduction in adverse events compared to ketorolac (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.96; RD -0.29, 95% CI -0.53 to -0.04; NNTB 4; 1 study, 59 children; low-certainty evidence). Despite identifying 43 RCTs, we remain uncertain about the effect of ibuprofen compared to placebo or active comparators for some critical outcomes and in the comparisons between different doses, schedules and routes for ibuprofen administration. This is largely due to poor reporting on important outcomes such as serious adverse events, and poor study conduct or reporting that reduced our confidence in the results, along with small underpowered studies. Compared to placebo, ibuprofen likely results in pain reduction less than two hours postintervention, however, the efficacy might be lower at two hours to 24 hours. Compared to paracetamol, ibuprofen likely results in pain reduction up to 24 hours postintervention. We could not explore if there was a different effect in different kinds of surgeries or procedures. Ibuprofen likely results in a reduction in adverse events compared to morphine, and in little to no difference in bleeding when compared to paracetamol. We remain mostly uncertain about the safety of ibuprofen compared to other drugs.

A Single-center, Randomized, Clinical Trial of Opioid-free Analgesia Versus Routine Opioid-Based Analgesia Regimen for the Management of Acute Postoperative Pain Following Cesarean Section

A Single-center, Randomized, Clinical Trial of Opioid-free Analgesia Versus Routine Opioid-Based Analgesia Regimen for the Management of Acute Postoperative Pain Following Cesarean Section

Efficacy and safety of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia after APS team standardized postoperative pain management: A 6-year experience of an acute pain service in 107802 Chinese patients

There are few studies on the impact of postoperative pain management (such as Acute Pain Service, APS) on the prognosis of patients, especially the research on large samples, even less data on Chinese patients. It is reported that only 25.12 % of hospitals in China have established APS or similar teams, and less than 10 % of them are responsible for the whole process of postoperative analgesia services. Tongji Hospital affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology has established a professional APS team led by anesthesiologists (TJ-APS), and has a standardized workflow and management system. Based on the TJ-APS standardized postoperative pain management, the incidence and adverse effects of postoperative pain in different types of surgical patients were analyzed. In total, 107,802 patients receiving intravenous PCA from the Tongji Hospital affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology were selected between January 2016 and December 2021, which were under TJ-APS standardized postoperative analgesia process, postoperative analgesia strategy based on the principle of “low opioid, multimodal, specialization and individualization”, as well as regular ward rounds and 24-h on call on-duty system. We assessed the incidence and adverse effects of postoperative pain in different types of surgical patients. Based on the TJ-APS standardized postoperative pain management, the incidence of poor postoperative analgesia in patients with intravenous PCA is significantly lower than that reported in the current literature (20 %), and mainly occurs in biliary-pancreatic surgery, extrahepatic surgery and gastrointestinal surgery. The overall incidence of adverse effects was 5.52 %, of which nausea and vomiting was the highest, especially among gynecological tumors and gynecological patients, which were 10.75 % and 8.68 % respectively, but both were lower than the level reported in the current literature (20 %). This APS multimodal management and analgesia process can provide reference and guidance for PCA management of postoperative acute pain.

Analgesia multimodal versus analgesia controlada pelo paciente no tratamento da dor aguda pós-operatória da coluna: revisão sistemática e meta-análise

Analgesia multimodal versus analgesia controlada pelo paciente no tratamento da dor aguda pós-operatória da coluna: revisão sistemática e meta-análise

Multimodal analgesia versus patient-controlled analgesia in the management of acute postoperative spinal pain: systematic review and meta-analysis

Multimodal analgesia versus patient-controlled analgesia in the management of acute postoperative spinal pain: systematic review and meta-analysis

Effectiveness of acute post-operative pain management by the acute pain service

Effectiveness of acute post-operative pain management by the acute pain service

Novel Opioids in the Setting of Acute Postoperative Pain: A Narrative Review.

Although traditional opioids such as morphine and oxycodone are commonly used in the management of acute postoperative pain, novel opioids may play a role as alternatives that provide potent pain relief while minimizing adverse effects. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of action, findings from preclinical studies and clinical trials, and potential advantages of several novel opioids. The more established include oliceridine (biased ligand activity to activate analgesia and downregulate opioid-related adverse events), tapentadol (mu-opioid agonist and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor), and cebranopadol (mu-opioid agonist with nociceptin opioid peptide activity)-all of which have demonstrated success in the clinical setting when compared to traditional opioids. On the other hand, dinalbuphine sebacate (DNS; semi-synthetic mu partial antagonist and kappa agonist), dual enkephalinase inhibitors (STR-324, PL37, and PL265), and endomorphin-1 analog (CYT-1010) have shown good efficacy in preclinical studies with future plans for clinical trials. Rather than relying solely on mu-opioid receptor agonism to relieve pain and risk opioid-related adverse events (ORAEs), novel opioids make use of alternative mechanisms of action to treat pain while maintaining a safer side-effect profile, such as lower incidence of nausea, vomiting, sedation, and respiratory depression as well as reduced abuse potential.

Intravenous methadone in the management of acute postoperative pain in a chronic cancer pain patient: A case report and review of the literature

Key Clinical MessageThe current landscape of literature highlights that there is insufficient well‐powered and robust evidence to support the integration of intravenous methadone into current guidelines and frameworks in supporting the pain management of cancer patient with complex pain syndromes. However, there is preliminary evidence, both from the literature as well as this case study that highlights intravenous methadone may be efficaciously and safety used for the management of postoperative pain in cancer patients with chronic pain undergoing operative management. Further research is required to fully elucidate key considerations of integrating this medication into clinical practice including consideration into dosing, opioid conversion, tolerance, and safety.AbstractMethadone is a broad‐spectrum analgesic with long duration of effect. Its multimodal mechanism of action, such as through effects on mu‐opioid receptor and presynaptic N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate receptors, has led to its current use in the management of opioid dependence in the community and in palliative care. These properties however make methadone appealing in the management of postoperative pain, particularly for patients with complex analgesic requirements. We report on an interesting case whereby intravenous methadone was effectively used for postoperative analgesia in a 56‐year‐old female with complex chronic pain secondary to a mucinous pelvic neoplasm of unclear primary who underwent palliative resection. Further, we review the literature surrounding usage of methadone in this setting to understand current challenges and barriers to implementation of methadone as an analgesia option for chronic pain patients following surgery. To do this, a case report and literature review was conducted in accordance to the CARE case report guidelines. The patient provided written consent for the de‐identification and use of their medical information and data for the generation and publication of this case report. Our case report and literature review demonstrate there remains significant heterogeneity, unfamiliarity, and scarce use of intravenous methadone in the perioperative and postoperative space in the management of patients with complex pain regimens such as chronic cancer pain patients. Despite this, our case report and literature review highlight as a broad analgesic, intravenous methadone warrants consideration following more rigorous research and development of safe use guidelines into its use for this purpose.

Shoulder pain management strategies and early functional outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff tear repair. A randomized controlled study

BackgroundThe management of acute postoperative pain after rotator cuff surgery can be challenging. To our knowledge, there are no data available in the literature correlating satisfactory pain control with improvement in terms of function. The purposes of the present study were to evaluate: 1) pain pattern after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients operated with two different techniques (transosseous vs transosseous equivalent); 2) safety/efficacy of three different pharmacological pain control strategies; 3) possible relationship between a correct shoulder pain management protocol in the early post-operative period and patients’ functional improvement. Methods114 patients underwent rotator cuff tear repair, either with a Transosseus or a Transosseus equivalent technique. 62 (54%) were male and 52 (46%) were female. The average age was 59 ± 9 years. They were randomly assigned into three different pain management protocols: Paracetamol as needed (max 3 tablets/day) for 1 week (Protocol A), Paracetamol + Codein 1 tablet three times per day for 7 days (Protocol B), or Paracetamol + Ibuprofen 1 tablet two times per day for 7 days (Protocol C). Immediate passive mobilization of the operated shoulder was allowed. VAS and Passive Flexion values were recorded at 7 (T1), 15 (T2) and 30 (T3) days post-surgery. DASH values were recorded at 90 days post-surgery. All patients were asked to register any kind of signs/symptoms that may appear during drug assumption according to each pain management protocols. ResultsAll the pain management protocols administered were well tolerated by all the study population, and no adverse signs/symptoms were highlighted during drug assumption.Pain pattern: in both surgical techniques, patients within Protocol A were associated with worst results in terms of mean VAS at each time point examined when compared to Protocol B and C (p < 0,05). In patients within Protocol A, no statistically significant differences were found at each point time examined comparing the two surgical techniques, with the exception of T2, where the TO was associated with an higher VAS value than TOE (p < 0.05). No differences were highlighted in Protocol B and C when comparing the values between two surgical techniques.ROM: in both surgical techniques, patients within Protocol A were associated with worst results in terms of mean PROM at each time point examined when compared to Protocol B and C (p < 0,05). In the TO group, patients within Protocol B had better PROM values at T1 (p < 0,05) and T2 (p < 0,05) compared to Protocol C, but no differences were highlighted at T3. In the TOE group, no statistically significant differences were found between patients within Protocol B and C at each time point examined.DASH: In the TO group, no statistically significant differences were found regarding the DASH values comparing Protocol B vs Protocol C, but they were highlighted comparing the values between Protocol A and Protocol B (p < 0,05), and between Protocol A and Protocol C (p < 0,05). Similar results were recorded in the TOE group. ConclusionPost-operative pain is influenced by the surgical technique used being transosseous more painful in the first 15 days after surgery. Oral anti-inflammatory drugs are a feasible strategy to appropriately control post-operative pain. An association between Paracetamol and either Codein or Ibuprofen can lead to better outcomes in terms of VAS reduction and early recovery of passive ROM.

Temporal trends and patterns in initial opioid prescriptions after hospital discharge following colectomy in England over 10 years.

While opioid analgesics are often necessary for the management of acute postoperative pain, appropriate prescribing practices are crucial to avoid harm. The aim was to investigate the changes in the proportion of people receiving initial opioid prescriptions after hospital discharge following colectomy, and describe trends and patterns in prescription characteristics. This was a retrospective cohort study. Patients undergoing colectomy in England between 2010 and 2019 were included using electronic health record data from linked primary (Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum) and secondary (Hospital Episode Statistics) care. The proportion of patients having an initial opioid prescription issued in primary care within 90 days of hospital discharge was calculated. Prescription characteristics of opioid type and formulation were described. Of 95 155 individuals undergoing colectomy, 15 503 (16.3%) received opioid prescriptions. There was a downward trend in the proportion of patients with no prior opioid exposure (opioid naive) who had a postdischarge opioid prescription (P <0.001), from 11.4% in 2010 to 6.7% in 2019 (-41.3%, P <0.001), whereas the proportions remained stable for those prescribed opioids prior to surgery, from 57.5% in 2010 to 58.3% in 2019 (P = 0.637). Codeine represented 44.5% of all prescriptions and prescribing increased by 14.5% between 2010 and 2019. Prescriptions for morphine and oxycodone rose significantly by 76.6% and 31.0% respectively, while tramadol prescribing dropped by 48.0%. The most commonly prescribed opioid formulations were immediate release (83.9%), followed by modified release (5.8%) and transdermal (3.2%). There was a modest decrease in the prescribing of immediate-release formulations from 86.0% in 2010 to 82.0% in 2019 (P <0.001). Over the 10 years studied, there was a changing pattern of opioid prescribing following colectomy, with a decrease in the proportion of opioid-naive patients prescribed postdischarge opioids.

The incidence of post cholecystectomy pain (PCP) syndrome at 12months following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective evaluation in 200 patients.

Post cholecystectomy pain syndrome can cause significant distress, impairs quality of life and exacerbations often result in emergency visits. Poorly controlled postoperative pain is a recognized cause of persistent postsurgical pain. Abdominal myofascial pain syndrome is an underdiagnosed cause of persistent pain in this cohort. The objective was to estimate the incidence of poorly controlled postoperative pain in the first 48 h after surgery and the likelihood of developing persistent pain at 12 months. The patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy at a tertiary unit were consented for participation in a prospective service evaluation. A telephone review was performed at three, six and twelve months after surgery. Incidence of poorly controlled pain in the first 48 h after surgery was assessed. Patients with persistent pain were referred to the pain clinic. Over a six-month period, 200 patients were assessed. Eleven patients were excluded (5.5 %). Twelve patients were lost to follow-up (6.6 %, 12/189). Patient satisfaction with acute postoperative pain management was low in 40 % (76/189). Poorly controlled postoperative pain was reported by 36 % (68/189) of patients. Incidence of persistent pain was 29 % (54/189) at 12 months post-surgery. Over half of patients with persistent pain (63 %, 34/54) reported poorly controlled postoperative pain. A somatic source was diagnosed in 54 % (29/54) with post cholecystectomy pain syndrome. Poorly controlled postoperative pain was reported by a third of patients. Persistent pain was present in 29 % at twelve months post-surgery. Abdominal myofascial pain syndrome should be considered as a differential diagnosis in post cholecystectomy pain syndrome.

Manajemen Asuhan Keperawatan Pada Ny.M dengan Masalah Nyeri Akut Post Sectio Caesarea

This study aims to describe the nursing management of acute pain problems in optimal one-day care in the Central Surgical Installation Room (IBS) RSUD using a 3M problem-based analysis (man, method, materials). The results of the research show that by carrying out optimal pain management, starting from assessment to evaluation of pain to optimizing non-pharmacological interventions (music therapy and deep breathing relaxation), patient pain complaints show improvement from moderate to mild scale (NRS) as well as the role of nurses in independent intervention also better. Problems studied in the room include the lack of optimal management of acute postoperative pain (from assessment to evaluation of pain, sometimes it is not done in the room), there is no SOP for pain intervention, there is no guideline for handling pain in the room, and the implementation of independent nurse intervention related to pain has not been implemented. In conclusion, with optimal assessment and evaluation of pain, including non-pharmacological technical interventions that are relatively easy to learn and apply independently by nurses, the results obtained are that the client's pain level is reduced from moderate pain on a scale of 5 to low pain on a scale of 3 on the NRS scale.&#x0D; &#x0D; Keywords: Central Surgical Installation, Nursing Care Management, Acute Pain

Gestión del dolor agudo postoperatorio: condiciones para garantizar la seguridad y la efectividad de los tratamientos analgésicos

The evidence on postoperative pain management is of low or insufficient quality. The SEDAR Acute Pain Working Group has prepared this guideline-document to apply the best available scientific evidence to clinical practice, individualizing it based on factors specific to the patient and the procedure, and encompassing different organizational options, attempting to individualize it based on specific factors of the patient and the procedure, and encompassing the different organizational options for pain control.The document updates concepts and minimum requirements necessary for optimal postoperative analgesia, a multidisciplinary approach and the management of acute postoperative pain. Strategic lines and different management models are defined. A general perioperative action plan is established based on collaboration with the surgical departments involved, on the joint review of the evidence and on preparation of protocols by the procedure. Finally, a follow-up plan and a series of minimum indicators necessary for quality control of postoperative pain are presented.

Management of acute postoperative pain: Conditions to guarantee the safety and effectiveness of analgesic treatments

The evidence on postoperative pain management is of low or insufficient quality. The SEDAR Acute Pain Working Group has prepared this guideline-document to apply the best available scientific evidence to clinical practice, individualizing it based on factors specific to the patient and the procedure, and encompassing different organizational options, attempting to individualize it based on specific factors of the patient and the procedure, and encompassing the different organizational options for pain control.The document updates concepts and minimum requirements necessary for optimal postoperative analgesia, a multidisciplinary approach and the management of Acute Postoperative Pain. Strategic lines and different management models are defined. A general perioperative action plan is established based on collaboration with the surgical departments involved, on the joint review of the evidence and on preparation of protocols by the procedure. Finally, a follow-up plan and a series of minimum indicators necessary for quality control of postoperative pain are presented.