Management Of Pain Crisis Research Articles

Intravenous Acetaminophen vs Intravenous Diclofenac in the Management of Painful Crisis in Sickle Cell Disease

Intravenous Acetaminophen vs Intravenous Diclofenac in the Management of Painful Crisis in Sickle Cell Disease

P10 An audit to assess the prescribing of analgesia in children who present with pain crisis due to Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)

AimTo assess the prescribing of analgesia to manage pain crises in children with SCD. This was to establish whether the Trust was meeting national and local standards. Prompt pain control is essential to reduce length of stay and further complications.1Standards100% of admissions will be prescribed regular paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) at the recommended frequency unless contraindicated in accordance with national guidance.2 3100% of admissions will be prescribed appropriate doses of analgesia with consideration to weight and age in accordance with local policy.4MethodThe audit was registered with the Trust’s audit committee. A list of paediatric patients with the diagnosis of SCD was sought from paediatricians with an interest in haematology. A data collection form was created. Data was collected retrospectively over a one-year period. A total of 60 admissions were reviewed to check whether analgesia was prescribed regularly at the recommended frequency, and at the correct dose. Results were analysed using descriptive statistical analysis. Exclusion criteria included patients with hospital admissions under 24 hours.ResultsA total of 55 admissions were included in the final sample. The audit showed the Trust was non-adherent to both standards assessed. A total of 45% (95% CI [31.9%, 58.1%]) of admissions were prescribed regular analgesia. A total of 78% (95% CI [67.9%, 88.9%] of admissions were prescribed appropriate doses of analgesia. Two main reasons were found as to why analgesia was prescribed at the incorrect dose. This was due to incorrect weights recorded on the electronic system (n=4) and doses based on age only (n=8).ConclusionThe results show prescribers are familiar with the correct doses of analgesia but fail to prescribe analgesia regularly. This highlights an opportunity for education and training in the management of pain crisis in SCD. One recommendation includes development of an integrated care pathway booklet for paediatric patients presenting with pain crisis due to SCD. Integrated care pathway booklets have been implemented for other conditions such as cystic fibrosis yielding positive outcomes. The results have highlighted key issues surrounding the electronic prescribing system such as out-of-date weights remaining on the system unless updated, and default treatment protocols. The electronic prescribing system requires refinement for use within paediatrics. One suggestion includes compulsory weight field on admission. Limitations of this audit included small sample size. There was a lack of data to make suggestions based on different ages.ReferencesRees D, Olujohungbe A, Parker N, et al. Guidelines for the management of the acute painful crises in sickle cell disease. Br J Haemato 2003;120:744–752.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2012) Sickle cell disease: managing acute painful episodes in hospital. NICE Guideline (CG143).Paediatric Formulary Committee. BNF for Children (2018–2019). London: BMJ Group, Pharmaceutical Press, and RCPCH Publications; (2018).General Hospital (2015) Management of sickle cell disease in paediatric patients (CG377).

Adult Cancer Pain, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

In recent years, the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Adult Cancer Pain have undergone substantial revisions focusing on the appropriate and safe prescription of opioid analgesics, optimization of nonopioid analgesics and adjuvant medications, and integration of nonpharmacologic methods of cancer pain management. This selection highlights some of these changes, covering topics on management of adult cancer pain including pharmacologic interventions, nonpharmacologic interventions, and treatment of specific cancer pain syndromes. The complete version of the NCCN Guidelines for Adult Cancer Pain addresses additional aspects of this topic, including pathophysiologic classification of cancer pain syndromes, comprehensive pain assessment, management of pain crisis, ongoing care for cancer pain, pain in cancer survivors, and specialty consultations.

Pain Relief in the Sickle-Cell Crisis: Intravenous Morphine Versus Ketorolac; A Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a congenital hemoglobinopathy. A low Hb level and high hemoglobin-to-hematocrit ratio may lead to the vaso-occlusive crisis in patients, for the management of which hyperbaric oxygen, hydration, and pain relief therapy are proposed. Objectives: In this study, we sought to compare the effects of morphine and ketorolac on relieving painful sickle cell crisis. Methods: In this double-blind, randomized clinical trial, we recruited 92 SCD patients who referred to the Emergency Department of a university-affiliated hospital, in Mashhad, Iran, from December 2016 to May 2017. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups of ketorolac and morphine injections for relieving pain crisis according to the clinical conditions of the patients. Pain severity was measured by the visual analogue scale before and after the intervention. Data were analyzed using SPSS software. Results: A total of 92 SCD patients were evaluated, while, 19 (21%) were female and 73 (79%) were male, with the mean age of 20.77 ± 8.6 years. At the pre-injection phase, the mean pain scores were 9.1 ± 0.4 and 9.1 ± 0.7 in the ketorolac and morphine groups, respectively. After the intervention, the mean pain scores were 3.7 ± 1.2 and 4.9 ± 2.1 in the ketorolac and morphine groups, respectively. A significant association was found between the pain score after drug injection and the administered drug (P = 0.006). Conclusions: The management of pain crisis with ketorolac injection yielded the same results as the morphine injection in SCD patients. However, ketorolac was found to be associated with fewer side effects than morphine; thus, it can be beneficial for managing SCD patients suffering pain crisis.

PM.64 Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Sickle Cell Disease at a London Hospital (2006–2012)

IntroductionSCD is associated with both maternal and fetal complications including pre-eclampsia, growth restriction and stillbirth together with an increased frequency of acute painful crises.MethodThis was a 6-year retrospective audit of...

The management of painful crisis in sickle cell disease

Until recently management of sickle pain was the province of haematologists. However, a recent National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death report highlighted problems with the management of pain and opioid analgesia in this group and suggested a multiagency approach similar to that used in palliative care. Pain is the most frequent complication of this haemoglobin disorder. Sickle cell disease is very variable with many patients leading full lives with long periods with little or no pain. At the other end of the spectrum there are those who exist in a sea of pain. The mechanisms of sickle pain are poorly understood and evidence for the best treatment modalities sparse. Historically there has been a dearth of clinical trials in sickle cell; however, this is starting to be addressed. In this review we will give a brief overview of the disease and its pathogenesis before examining the epidemiology, management of pain in sickle cell disease. We will also review recent evidence regarding quality of life and discuss the role of opioid hyperalgesia in sickle cell disease.

Management of acute painful crises in sickle cell disease

Pain is a common mode of manifestation of sickle cell disease (SCD) but there is limited information on pain management in this disorder. This study examines the use of opioids and non-opioid analgesia in the management of painful crisis in adult SCD patients; the routine use of antimalarials and antibiotics as adjunct therapy was also examined. A total of 87% of the patients had had a form of analgesics before presentation, 20% of which had parenteral analgesia. Ten per cent had not used any form of medication while another 10% used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. When asked, 59% of the patients desired oral non-opioid analgesics while 31% were not concerned about the type of analgesic given. Only 8% requested opioids. Hospital admission was not necessary in 65% of the patients; they were observed in the day-care unit and allowed home within 24 h. Sixty per cent did not have a test for malaria; 66% of those who had the test performed were negative, 35% of those whose thick film for malaria was negative had antimalarials prescribed. Only five patients (7%) were febrile at presentation. Thirty-four per cent had antibiotics prescribed, a third of these parenterally. Thirty-nine per cent had no fever but received antibiotics.