Management Of Metastatic Renal Cancer Research Articles

Therapeutic Management of Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Revolution in Every Decade.

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) oncogenesis is mainly driven by VHL gene inactivation, leading to overexpression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). The use of tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) directed against VEGF and its receptor (VEGFR) revolutionised the management of metastatic renal cancer in the 2000s. The more recent development of next-generation TKIs such as cabozantinib or lenvatinib has made it possible to bypass some of the mechanisms of resistance to first-generation anti-VEGFR TKIs. During the decade 2010-2020, the development of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapies revolutionised the management of many solid cancers, including RCC, in first- and subsequent-line settings. Dual ICB or ICB plus anti-VEGFR TKI combinations are now the standard of care for patients with advanced clear cell RCC. To optimise these combination therapies while preserving patient quality of life, escalation and de-escalation strategies are being evaluated in prospective randomised trials, based on patient selection according to their prognosis risk. Finally, new therapeutic approaches, such as targeting hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) and the development of innovative treatments using antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), CAR-T cells, or radiopharmaceuticals, are all potential candidates to improve further patient survival.

Current Management Options in Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer.

Renal cancer accounts for 2.4% of all cancers. Localised disease accounts for the majority of renal cancers (70-75%), however 20-25% of these ultimately develop distant metastasis. The median overall survival of un treated metastatic disease is 5 months with 1-year survival of only 29%. The management of metastatic renal cell cancers traditionally relied on systemic immunotherapy with attendant high morbidity but after the year 2005 the use of effective targeted therapy with tolerable side effect profile has improved the survival from 10.2 months in the cytokine era to 17.7 months. This article reviews the past, present and future options in the management of metastatic renal cancer.

Cytotoxic activity of sunitinib and everolimus in Caki-1 renal cancer cells is accompanied by modulations in the expression of apoptosis-related microRNA clusters and BCL2 family genes

Sunitinib and everolimus are two of the antineoplastic agents indicated for the management of metastatic renal cancer. Although both of the above compounds were primarily designed as antiangiogenic factors, preclinical studies claim that these drugs can also trigger apoptosis. Herein, we sought to evaluate the cytotoxic activity of sunitinib and everolimus against renal cancer cells Caki-1 and moreover to assess their impact on the expression levels of three BCL2 family members and three apoptosis-related microRNA clusters upon incubation with the drugs or following recovery from treatment. The cytotoxic effect of sunitinib and everolimus on Caki-1 cells’ viability was estimated by the MTT assay, while cleaved PARP, assayed via Western Blotting, served as a marker of programmed cell death. As for the expression levels of the BCL2 family members BCL2, BAX and BCL2L12 and those of the mature microRNAs of the miR-183/96/182, miR-143/145, and miR-15a/16 clusters, they were quantified via real-time PCR. Our results showed that both agents induced a time- and dose-dependent decrease in cell viability and promoted cleavage of PARP. In parallel, significant modulations were observed in the expression levels of miR-145, miR-15a, and miR-16 in case of sunitinib, whereas BCL2, BAX, miR-145 and miR-15a expression was strongly affected by everolimus. Overall, our data support the notion that sunitinib and everolimus are able to directly induce cell death in renal cancer cells and simultaneously affect the expression levels of their apoptosis-related microRNAs and BCL2 family members upon this process.

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma management

To assess the current treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma, focusing on medical treatment options. The most important recent publications have been selected after a literature search employing PubMed using the search terms: advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinoma, anti-angiogenesis drugs and systemic therapy; also significant meeting abstracts were consulted. Progress in understanding the molecular basis of renal cell carcinoma, especially related to genetics and angiogenesis, has been achieved mainly through of the study of von Hippel-Lindau disease. A great variety of active agents have been developed and tested in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients. New specific molecular therapies in metastatic disease are discussed. Sunitinib, Sorafenib and Bevacizumab increase the progression-free survival when compared to therapy with cytokines. Temsirolimus increases overall survival in high-risk patients. Growth factors and regulatory enzymes, such as carbonic anhydrase IX may be targets for future therapies. A broader knowledge of clear cell carcinoma molecular biology has permitted the beginning of a new era in mRCC therapy. Benefits of these novel agents in terms of progression-free and overall survival have been observed in patients with mRCC, and, in many cases, have become the standard of care. Sunitinib is now considered the new reference first-line treatment for mRCC. Despite all the progress in recent years, complete responses are still very rare. Currently, many important issues regarding the use of these agents in the management of metastatic renal cancer still need to be properly addressed.

Integration of surgery and systemic therapy in the management of metastatic renal cancer

Integration of surgery and systemic therapies represents the best management option for most patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cytoreductive nephrectomy, metastasectomy, and consolidative surgery can all play a vital role in this challenging patient population. Relevant issues in this era relate to the timing of surgery, the role of cytoreduction as systemic therapies become more effective, management of the residual mass, and surgical safety after targeted therapy.

Carbonic anhydrase IX and the future of molecular markers in renal cell carcinoma

The use of carbonic anhydrase IX as a promising molecular marker in RCC is described by authors from Los Angeles, who discuss the promise that molecular markers hold to improve diagnosis, staging, treatment, surveillance and survival of patients with RCC. There is a whole range of new treatments being introduced in the management of metastatic renal cancer. The use of VEGF-targeted therapy has particular importance, especially as it has a strong genetically linked rationale for its potential success in this area. Authors from the USA show that substantial clinical activity has been reported in initial clinical trials. In prostate cancer, drugs targeting microtubules, such as taxanes, have already been introduced clinically, and their success has received widespread attention. A new group of drugs, the epothilones, have similar but not identical binding properties to microtubules, and authors from the USA describe how they have shown activity in hormone-refractory prostate cancer, and are moving to phase III testing.

Management of Metastatic Renal Cancer

The purpose of this article is to review the systemic management options for patients with metastatic renal cancer. We reviewed the literature regarding systemic management of metastatic renal cancer. Treatment options of chemotherapy agents, immunotherapy, molecularly targeted agents, allogeneic stem cell transplantation, vaccines, and other manipulations of the immune system are discussed. No chemotherapy agent used alone or in combination has consistently produced responses to substantiate its routine use. Interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) have shown response rates ranging from 10% to 20%. Some studies have shown that retinoids may enhance the antitumor activity of IFN-alpha. Molecularly targeted agents and angiogenic agents are being actively pursued and several studies are showing response rates above 30%. Although nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation shows some promising results, they also have limitations to its use. Therapy strategies that incorporate vaccines as part of comprehensive immune manipulations are also being studied. The systemic treatment of patients with advanced renal cell cancer continues to be a significant challenge. Immunotherapy treatment has shown response in up to 20% of patients. Unfortunately, most do not respond. The current technologies are promising and may be the key step for introduction of better treatments for renal cancer care.

Immunotherapy of metastatic renal cell cancer.

The management of metastatic renal cancer remains a therapeutic challenge. Conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy is rarely effective, and the most promising approaches appear to lie in the field of immunotherapy. The authors review the literature regarding current and investigational immunotherapy approaches to the management of metastatic renal cancer. The mechanism of action, methods of delivery, efficacy, and side effect profile of the cytokines IL-2 and interferon alfa are discussed. The role of investigational approaches such as tumor vaccines, antibody-based therapy, lymphocyte infusions, and bone marrow transplantation is addressed. The rationale for nephrectomy as an adjunctive procedure to immunotherapy is also discussed. Ongoing laboratory investigation of the cause of the immune deficit in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer will result in the development of novel therapies to enhance tumor cell recognition as well as host antitumor response. Translation of laboratory findings into the clinic will be facilitated by the presence of an already well-developed infrastructure for the performance of clinical trials for patients with this difficult diagnosis.

Should radical nephrectomy be performed in the face of surgically incurable disease?

The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the management of metastatic renal cancer remains controversial. Recent trials, like SWOG 8949 have suggested the usefulness of this approach at least in selected patients with good performance status and other favorable indicators. The timing of cytoreductive nephrectomy has also been controversial and remains so to this time. Commentary An estimated 30,000 new cases of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are detected annually in the U.S. In approximately one-third of these cases, metastatic disease is diagnosed at presentation. Multi-modality treatment combines biologic response modifier (BRM) therapy with surgery in an attempt to improve survival with either form of treatment alone. The optimal timing of surgery relative to BRM therapy continues to be debated. Prior to the advent of multi-modality therapy, there were relatively few indications for nephrectomy in patients with metastatic RCC. The incidence of spontaneous regression of metastatic RCC following removal of the primary tumor is only 1–4% and, therefore, nephrectomy on this basis is not justified. There is a palliative role for nephrectomy in selected patients with metastatic RCC who are experiencing severe disability from associated local symptoms; however, some patients in this category can be managed with percutaneous renal angioinfarction. A small subset of patients with a solitary metastasis may benefit from nephrectomy and resection of the metastatic lesion based on reported 5-year survival rates of up to 30–35%. There has been controversy concerning the appropriate timing of adjuvant or cytoreductive nephrectomy in the multi-modality approach to treatment of metastatic RCC. Many protocols have involved preliminary removal of the primary tumor before the administration of BRM therapy. The rationale for this has been to enhance response rates to BRM therapy by reducing tumor volume and, in some cases, to provide immunoreactive cells for treatment. A drawback of this approach was that many patients underwent nephrectomy without subsequently receiving BRM therapy due to postoperative morbidity/mortality or rapid tumor progression. This prompted interest in an alternative approach of delayed adjuvant nephrectomy wherein BRM therapy was administered initially and nephrectomy was subsequently performed only in those patients who demonstrated a response to systemic therapy. The relative merits of initial versus delayed adjuvant nephrectomy in conjunction with BRM therapy for metastatic RCC have recently been clarified through two phase III prospective multicenter clinical trials conducted in Europe (EORTC) and the United States (SWOG). The results of both of these carefully done studies have indicated improved survival with initial nephrectomy followed by BRM therapy. The latter comprised interferon monotherapy in both studies, which opens the studies to criticism, however the essential observation of extended survival with preliminary nephrectomy appears to be valid. On this basis, there is now objective evidence to suggest that initial cytoreductive nephrectomy is the preferred approach in patients with metastatic RCC who are candidates for multi-modality therapy. The most appropriate candidates for such therapy remain patients with good performance status and low-volume (preferably pulmonary) metastatic disease. The ability to perform cytoreductive nephrectomy laparoscopically in some of these patients, with reduced morbidity, is a further development that has strengthened the argument in favor of initial nephrectomy. Andrew C. Novick, M.D.

Should radical nephrectomy be performed in the face of surgically incurable disease?

The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the management of metastatic renal cancer remains controversial. Recent trials, like SWOG 8949 have suggested the usefulness of this approach at least in selected patients with good performance status and other favorable indicators. The timing of cytoreductive nephrectomy has also been controversial and remains so to this time.