Management Of Major Trauma Patients Research Articles

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in trauma management: a comprehensive study of clinical indications and challenges

BackgroundThe application of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in trauma resuscitation, including for profound shock and cardiac arrest, has gained prominence. This study aimed to determine the...

The ABCDE approach: Evaluation of adherence in a low-income country

BackgroundEarly recognition and initial treatment of trauma patients prevents deterioration and buys time for making a definitive diagnosis. The “Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability and Exposure” (ABCDE) approach should be used whenever an injury is suspected. It provides quick identification and management of life-threatening problems. Still, there is limited knowledge regarding adherence to the ABCDE approach. This research aims to assess the adherence of the trauma team members to the ABCDE approach in the management of major trauma patients and the factors affecting it. MethodThe study is a cross-sectional hospital-based study conducted in the trauma and resuscitation rooms of major governmental hospitals in Khartoum in the period from Jan.30, 2022, to Mar.29, 2022. It was done among the medical staff dealing with major trauma cases. Data were collected by observation using a modified standardized checklist for assessing the ABCDE approach and via a self-administered questionnaire for identifying the factors affecting adherence. Total coverage of all major trauma cases resuscitation (n = 50) was done. Also, a sample size of 158 medical staff was covered for the questionnaire. The data was analyzed in Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS) V.23. ResultsThe mean percentage of adherence to the ABCDE approach was 37.9 % (SD 15.44). When the ABCDE sequence was not followed, the ACB was the commonest sequence. Also, adherence had no significant relation with any patient or staff-related factor. The main present obstacles to adherence to the ABCDE approach were overcrowding in the room and unprepared facilities. While the major present facilitator was the clinical experience. ConclusionThe adherence rate was low, but initiation of the ABCDE approach was rapid. The factors participating in low adherence rates were usually facility or population-based factors. We recommend further studies, further training and embedment of guidelines, and the provision of larger trauma rooms with adequate supplies.

Determining the educational impact of virtual patients on trauma team training during a multinational, large-scale civil military simulation exercise.

With asymmetrical conflicts ongoing, many countries have an increasing number of major trauma events but limited capacity to cope with these events. Training for such events comprises primarily of simulations requiring significant resources and that are time-consuming and expensive. Virtual patients are defined as computer-based programs presenting authentic cases support training in trauma management. Assisted learning technologies augment simulated trauma team training and can improve trauma team competencies. The aim was to investigate if virtual patients increased competencies in decision making required and to identify deficiencies in care for the management of trauma patients during a multinational civil military trauma exercise. A prospective educational intervention study with mixed methods, measuring the effects of a novel virtual patient model on trauma teams, was performed. The population consisted of surgeons, anesthesiologists, emergency department physicians, nurses, and paramedics (n = 30) and constituted six trauma teams from eight countries; three trauma teams formed the participating group, and three were allocated as control group. The participating group was exposed to virtual patients before, during, and after the live simulation exercise. Data sources were derived from individual preassessments and postassessments, evaluations made by experts in trauma, and video recordings of performance during the live simulation exercise and analyzed by the thematic analysis method. Using virtual patients contributed to improved individual knowledge about the management of major trauma patients and improved teamwork. Virtual patients as support for reasoning in decision making were directly correlated to level of previous knowledge and experience. Two of the three participating trauma teams showed lower levels of existing knowledge and competence in managing major trauma patients and therefore made more efficient use of the virtual patients. Results demonstrated advantages using virtual patients during a major civil military trauma live simulation exercise and appear to be supportive especially for teams who are not as experienced. Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Spinal injury in major trauma: Epidemiology of 1104 cases from an Italian first level trauma center

IntroductionTraumatic spinal injuries are frequent and their management is debated, especially in major trauma patients. This study aims to describe a large population of major trauma patients with vertebral fractures to improve prevention measures and fracture management. Patients and methodsRetrospective analysis of 6274 trauma patients prospectively collected between October 2010 and October 2020. Collected data include demographics, mechanism of trauma, type of imaging, fracture morphology, associated injuries, injury severity score (ISS), survival, and death timing. The statistical analysis focused on mechanism of trauma and the search of predictive factors for critical fractures. ResultsPatients showed a mean age of 47 years and 72.5% were males. Trauma included 59.9% of road accidents and 35.1% of falls. 30.7% patients had at least a severe fracture, while 17.2% had fractures in multiple spinal regions. 13.7% fractures were complicated by spinal cord injury (SCI). The mean ISS of the total population was 26.4 (SD 16.3), with 70.7% patients having an ISS≥16. There is a higher rate of severe fractures in fall cases (40.1%) compared to RA (21.9% to 26.3%). The probability of a severe fracture increased by 164% in the case of fall and by 77% in presence of AIS≥3 associated injury of head/neck while reduced by 34% in presence of extremities associated injuries. Multiple level injuries increased with ISS rise and in the case of extremities associated injuries. The probability of a severe upper cervical fracture increased by 5.95 times in the presence of facial associated injuries. The mean length of stay was 24.7 days and 9.6% of patients died. ConclusionsIn Italy, road accidents are still the most frequent trauma mechanism and cause more cervico-thoracic fractures, while falls cause more lumbar fractures. Spinal cord injuries represent an indicator of more severe trauma. In motorcyclists or fallers/jumpers, there is a higher risk of severe fractures. When a spinal injury is diagnosed, the probability of a second vertebral fracture is consistent. These data could help the decisional workflow in the management of major trauma patients with vertebral injury.

Major trauma care at a regional trauma centre during the COVID-19 lockdown in England.

The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the presentation of many medical and surgical conditions, including major trauma. We aimed to assess how lockdown changed the presentation, severity and management of major trauma patients at our level 1 trauma centre in England. Data were collected retrospectively from the Trauma Audit and Research Network's database between 23 March and 28 April 2020 and compared with the same period in 2019. Collected data included patient demographics, and the mechanism, severity and management of injuries. We experienced a 56.4% reduction in major trauma admissions during the lockdown period when compared with 2019. In 2020, more patients arrived in haemodynamic shock (25.3% vs 12.2%, p=0.02); however, Glasgow Coma Scale and Injury Severity Score were unchanged. A higher proportion of incidents occurred at home (37.2% vs 53.5%, p=0.018), with no difference in trauma secondary to substance abuse or assault. During lockdown, patients had a significantly shorter hospital (17 vs 10 days, p=0.029) and critical care stay (2 vs 1 day, p=0.033). A higher proportion of major trauma patients were assessed by specialty trainees in the emergency department in 2020 (12.8% vs 53.1%, p=0.0001) with a lower proportion assessed by a consultant (69.8% vs 46.7%, p=0.001). The COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown drastically changed human behaviour, as reflected in the change in presentation of major trauma. Changes in the management of these patients reflect adaptive measures to manage the pressures generated by the worldwide pandemic.

Four years of experience as a major trauma centre results in no improvement in patient selection for whole-body CT scans following blunt trauma.

Management of major trauma patients with evidence of polytrauma involves the use of immediate whole-body CT (WBCT). Identification of patients appropriate for immediate WBCT remains challenging. Our study aimed to assess for improvement in patient selection for WBCT over time as a major trauma centre (MTC). We conducted a retrospective study of patients who presented to our MTC during distinct two-month periods, one in 2013 and the other in 2017. Patients over 18years of age who presented primarily following blunt trauma and activated a major trauma call were included. All patients underwent either immediate WBCT or standard ATLS workup. Those undergoing WBCT had the results of their scan recorded as positive or negative. A total of 516 patients were included, 232 from 2months in 2013 and 284 from 2months in 2017. There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients undergoing WBCT (61.6% vs 59.5%), selective CT (31.9% vs 32.4%) or no CT (6.5% vs 8.1%) between the cohorts. There was no improvement in the rate of negative WBCT observed between 2013 and 2017 (47.6% vs 39.6%, p = 0.17). There was no improvement in patient selection for WBCT following trauma at our institution over a three-year period. Optimal patient selection presents an ongoing clinical challenge, with 39-47% of patients undergoing a scan demonstrating no injuries.

Early coagulation support protocol: A valid approach in real-life management of major trauma patients. Results from two Italian centres

IntroductionEarly coagulation support (ECS) includes prompt infusion of tranexamic acid, fibrinogen concentrate, and packed red blood cells for initial resuscitation of major trauma patients. The aim of this study was to determine the effects, in terms of blood product consumption, length of stay, and in-hospital mortality, of the ECS protocol, compared to the massive transfusion protocol (MTP) in the treatment of major trauma patients. Patients and methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted using the registry data of two Italian trauma centres. Adult major trauma patients with, or at risk of, active bleeding who were managed according to the MTP during the years 2011–2012, or the ECS protocol during the years 2013–2014 and were considered at risk of multiple transfusions, were enrolled. The primary endpoint was to determine whether the ECS protocol reduces the use of blood products in the acute management of trauma patients. Secondary endpoints were the outcome measures of length of stay in ICU, length of stay in hospital, and mortality at 24-hours and 28-days after hospital admission. ResultsAmong the 518 major trauma patients admitted to the trauma centres during the study period, 235 patients (118 in the pre-ECS period and 117 in the ECS period) matched one of the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. Compared with the pre-ECS period, the ECS period showed a reduction in the average consumption of packed red blood cells (−1.87 units, 95% confidence interval [CI], −2.40, −1.34), platelets (−1.28 units; 95% CI, −1.64, −0.91), and fresh frozen plasma (−1.69; 95% CI, −2.14, −1.25) in the first 24-hours. Furthermore, during the ECS period, we recorded a 10-day reduction in the hospital length of stay (−10 days, 95% CI, −11.6, −8.4) and a non-significant 28-day mortality increase. ConclusionsThe ECS protocol was effective in reducing blood product consumption compared to the MTP and confirmed the importance of early fibrinogen administration as a strategy of rapid coagulation. This novel approach may be adopted in real-life management of major trauma patients.

Predictors of Hypothermia upon Trauma Center Arrival in Severe Trauma Patients Transported to Hospital via EMS

Introduction: Hypothermia in severe trauma patients can increase mortality by 25%. Active warming practices decrease mortality and are recommended in the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) guidelines. Despite this, many emergency medical services (EMS) vehicles do not carry equipment necessary to perform active warming. The intent of this study was to determine the rate of hypothermia in severe trauma patients upon major trauma center (MTC) arrival, as well as to characterize factors associated with hypothermia in trauma in order to devote potential resources to those at highest risk. Methods: This single-center retrospective chart review included adults (age ≥ 18) in the local trauma registry (trauma team activation or injury severity score ≥12) from January 2009 to June 2016. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of hypothermia on MTC arrival. Results: A total of 3,070 patient charts were reviewed, of which 159 (5.2%) were hypothermic. Multivariate logistic regression identified 7 factors that were significantly associated with hypothermia on MTC arrival in severe trauma. Risk factors for hypothermia on MTC arrival after severe trauma included: intubation pre-MTC, increased number of co-morbidities, and increased injury severity. Conversely, protective factors against hypothermia were: higher initial systolic blood pressure (SBP), penetrating injury, referral to MTC, and higher ambient outdoor temperatures. Median length of stay in hospital was 7 days for hypothermic patients compared to 4 days for normothermic patients (Δ 3 days; p < 0.001). Only 69.2% of hypothermic patients survived to discharge compared to 93.9% of normothermic patients (Δ 24.7%; χ2 = 133.4, p < 0.001). Conclusions: This retrospective study of hypothermia in major trauma patients found a rate of hypothermia of 5%. Factors associated with higher risk of hypothermia include pre-MTC intubation, high ISS, multiple comorbidities, low SBP, non-penetrating mechanism of injury, and being transferred directly to MTC, and colder outdoor temperature. Avoidance of hypothermia is imperative to the management of major trauma patients. Prospective studies are required to determine if prehospital warming in these high-risk patients decreases the rate of hypothermia in major trauma and improves patient outcomes.

MP06: Predictors of hypothermia upon emergency department arrival in severe trauma patients transported to hospital via emergency medical services

Introduction: Hypothermia in severe trauma patients can increase mortality by 25%. Active re-warming decreases mortality and is recommended in trauma management guidelines. Despite this, many emergency medical services (EMS) vehicles do not carry equipment for active re-warming. This study sought to determine the local rate of hypothermia in major trauma patients on trauma centre arrival (TCA), and to establish which patients are at highest risk by identifying factors present in the pre-hospital setting associated with hypothermia in a humid continental climate. Methods: This single-centre retrospective chart review included adults (age 18) in the local trauma registry (trauma team activation or injury severity score &gt;12) from January 2009-June 2016. Patients were excluded if: temperature on TCA unknown or 38°C, not transported by EMS, or if there was &gt;24 hrs from injury to TCA. The primary outcome was the rate of hypothermia (&lt;35°C) in major trauma patients transported by EMS on arrival at the local trauma centre. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay and survival to discharge. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of hypothermia on TCA; it included the following factors: age, sex, weight, number of comorbidities, injury severity, injury mechanism, EMS modality, direct transport from scene or referred from peripheral hospital, time on scene, transport time, local temperature, and pre-hospital heart rate, systolic blood pressure (SBP), intubation, and volume of crystalloid. Results: A total of 3070 adult traumas were included, 159 of which were hypothermic on TCA a rate of 5%. Multivariate analysis identified seven risk factors for hypothermia: intubation pre-hospital (OR 8.10, p&lt;0.001), blunt trauma (OR 3.37, p=0.044 vs. penetrating, and OR 7.35, p=0.023 vs. other), direct transport (OR 1.94, p=0.005), number of comorbidities (OR 1.14, p=0.036), injury severity (OR 1.03, p&lt;0.001), 1°C local temperature drop (OR 1.03, p&lt;0.001), and 1mmHg SBP drop (OR 1.01, p&lt;0.001). Ninety-four percent of normothermic patients and 69.2% of hypothermic patients survived to discharge. Average length of stay was 7.98 and 15.23 days respectively. Conclusion: Avoidance of hypothermia is imperative to the management of major trauma patients. Those at highest risk in a humid continental climate are severely injured blunt trauma patients with multiple co-morbidities, a low pre-hospital SBP and EMS intubation. Future studies should focus on the benefits of pre-hospital rewarming in these high-risk patients.

World Academic Council of Emergency Medicine Experience Document: Implementation of Point-of-Care Thromboelastography at an Academic Emergency and Trauma Center.

Background:We aimed to discuss the initial experience of the implementation of point-of-care thromboelastography (POC-TEG) at the Level 1 Trauma Center of an academic health institution in Qatar.Materials and Methods:A TEG protocol was developed and tailored to our hospital requirements and patient population, after an exhausting review of the literature and international published protocols, including a synthesis of a preexisting TEG protocol from our heart hospital. To successfully achieve the incorporation of point-of-care testing (POCT) in our clinical practice, a multidisciplinary organizational and education approach is required. The education and training of the physicians in this POCT modality during the first 3 months period has been described in detail.Results:A TEG protocol has been developed and implemented according to hospital standards. Ten physicians from the department of trauma surgery have been trained over a 3-month period to perform the daily quality control as well as the patient samples in order to provide a 24/7 service. In patients with major trauma, brain injury, bleeding, sepsis, and coagulopathy are the most important determinants of the clinical course and outcomes. Viscoelastic whole-blood assays have already proved their values in cardiac as well as liver surgery. Therefore, this POCT-directed approach would be considered as a part of the goal-directed management in severe polytrauma patients.Conclusions:Our experience shows that implementation of POC-TEG program is feasible and it is a promising tool in the management of major trauma patients with a potential compromised coagulation. However, further prospective research projects and well-trained personnel still warranted.

Norwegian trauma care: a national cross-sectional survey of all hospitals involved in the management of major trauma patients.

BackgroundApproximately 10% of the Norwegian population is injured every year, with injuries ranging from minor injuries treated by general practitioners to major and complex injuries requiring specialist in-hospital care. There is a lack of knowledge concerning the caseload of potentially severely injured patients in Norwegian hospitals. Aim of the study was to describe the current status of the Norwegian trauma system by identifying the number and the distribution of contributing hospitals and the caseload of potentially severely injured trauma patients within these hospitals.MethodsA cross-sectional survey with a structured questionnaire was sent in the summer of 2012 to all Norwegian hospitals that receive trauma patients. These were defined by number of trauma team activations in the included hospitals. A literature review was performed to assess over time the development of hospitals receiving trauma patients.ResultsForty-one hospitals responded and were included in the study. In 2011, four trauma centres and 37 acute care hospitals received a total of 6,570 trauma patients. Trauma centres received 2,175 (33%) patients and other hospitals received 4,395 (67%) patients. There were significant regional differences between health care regions in the distribution of trauma patients between trauma centres and acute care hospitals. More than half (52.5%) of the hospitals received fewer than 100 patients annually. The national rate of hospital admission via trauma teams was 13 per 10,000 inhabitants. There was a 37% (from 65 to 41) reduction in the number of hospitals receiving trauma patients between 1988 and 2011.ConclusionsIn 2011, hospital acute trauma care in Norway was delivered by four trauma centres and 37 acute care hospitals. Many hospitals still receive a small number of potentially severely injured patients and only a few hospitals have an electronic trauma registry. Future development of the Norwegian trauma system needs to address the challenge posed by a scattered population and long geographical distances. The implementation of a trauma system, carefully balanced between centres with adequate caseloads against time from injury to hospital care, is needed and has been shown to have a beneficial effect in countries with comparable challenges.

The advantages of early trauma team activation in the management of major trauma patients who underwent exploratory laparotomy.

PurposeTrauma team activation (TTA) has been shown to have fundamental impact on trauma patients' outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of use of a new TTA protocol in the management of major trauma patients who underwent exploratory laparotomy.MethodsThe medical records of trauma patients who had been treated by the new TTA protocol (NT) over 18 months were compared with those of trauma patients treated by the old TTA protocol (OT) over 18 months. Comparisons between the two groups in terms of the time interval between accident and emergency room (ER) arrival, between ER arrival and CT scanning, between ER arrival and operating room (OR) presentation, between accident and OR presentation, mean intensive care unit (ICU) stay, mean hospital stay, mortality within 24 hours, mean mortality within one month, and overall mortality were performed using the Pearson chi-squared test and Student t-test.ResultsThe time interval between accident and ER arrival, between ER arrival and CT scanning, between ER arrival and OR presentation, and between accident and OR presentation was found to have decreased significantly with the use of NT compared to OT. However, the mean ICU stay, mean hospital stay, mortality within 24 hours, mortality within one month, and overall mortality were found not to have improved.ConclusionWhile initiation of early TTA can shorten the time interval in the management of trauma patients, it may not improve patient outcomes.

The 2009 Sydney shark attacks: case series and literature review

There were 59 unprovoked shark attacks worldwide in 2008. Twelve of these occurred in Australia, ranking it as second only to the USA. In February 2009, two attacks occurred within 72 h in Sydney, Australia. The two patients involved survived severe limb trauma. Case 1 suffered bite trauma to the lower limb and hand and underwent staged debridement and early amputation. Case 2 presented with a hand severed at the level of the wrist that was initially replanted. However, it would succumb to progressive necrosis after 12 days. We discuss the aspects of these cases that contributed to the patients' survival and ultimately good functional outcomes. New paradigms for the management of major trauma patients have emerged over the last decade. We consider recent advances in the understanding of pre-hospital tourniquet use, rapid transit to the operating suite and damage control surgery, and examine how they impacted on the management of our patients. Very little is known about the microbiology of shark bites. Organisms from sea water, the patient's skin and the shark's mouth must all be considered when selecting appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis. The planning of definitive surgery in severe limb trauma is dependent on the interactions of a number of factors including physical, psychological and social issues. The decision to ultimately replant or amputate the effected limb is best made in union with the patient and their family.

Fibrinogen concentrate for management of bleeding

Fibrinogen concentrate for management of bleeding

Goal-directed coagulation management of major trauma patients using thromboelastometry (ROTEM®)-guided administration of fibrinogen concentrate and prothrombin complex concentrate

IntroductionThe appropriate strategy for trauma-induced coagulopathy management is under debate. We report the treatment of major trauma using mainly coagulation factor concentrates.MethodsThis retrospective analysis included trauma patients who received ≥ 5 units of red blood cell concentrate within 24 hours. Coagulation management was guided by thromboelastometry (ROTEM®). Fibrinogen concentrate was given as first-line haemostatic therapy when maximum clot firmness (MCF) measured by FibTEM (fibrin-based test) was <10 mm. Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) was given in case of recent coumarin intake or clotting time measured by extrinsic activation test (EXTEM) >1.5 times normal. Lack of improvement in EXTEM MCF after fibrinogen concentrate administration was an indication for platelet concentrate. The observed mortality was compared with the mortality predicted by the trauma injury severity score (TRISS) and by the revised injury severity classification (RISC) score.ResultsOf 131 patients included, 128 received fibrinogen concentrate as first-line therapy, 98 additionally received PCC, while 3 patients with recent coumarin intake received only PCC. Twelve patients received FFP and 29 received platelet concentrate. The observed mortality was 24.4%, lower than the TRISS mortality of 33.7% (P = 0.032) and the RISC mortality of 28.7% (P > 0.05). After excluding 17 patients with traumatic brain injury, the difference in mortality was 14% observed versus 27.8% predicted by TRISS (P = 0.0018) and 24.3% predicted by RISC (P = 0.014).ConclusionsROTEM®-guided haemostatic therapy, with fibrinogen concentrate as first-line haemostatic therapy and additional PCC, was goal-directed and fast. A favourable survival rate was observed. Prospective, randomized trials to investigate this therapeutic alternative further appear warranted.

The Impact of Enhanced Intensive Care on Outcome of Major Trauma Patients in a Regional Hospital in Hong Kong

ObjectivesTo describe an updated epidemiology of major trauma cases presenting to a regional hospital in Hong Kong and to analyse the impact of enhanced intensive care on the outcome of major trauma patients.MethodsThis was a retrospective comparative study. In late 2004, we amended our trauma care system with enhancement of intensive care in the management of major trauma patients. An 18-month period was chosen before and after the amendment respectively and patients' data and crude mortality rate between the two periods were compared. Stratified analyses based on mechanism of injury, injury severity and physiological parameters were also performed. Finally, a TRISS analysis was included.ResultsAltogether 163 and 155 patients were included in our study from the two periods respectively. The majority involved blunt injury and one third of them had injury severity score (ISS) greater than 15. Road traffic accidents and fall from height remained as the two leading causes of major trauma. The median length of stay in the intensive care unit increased for one day (p&lt;0.01) in the later period but the median total length of stay in hospital remained the same. The mortality rate decreased from 10.4% to 9.7% (p=0.82).ConclusionWith enhanced intensive care, there is an apparent decrease in mortality of major trauma patients but its significance needs to be determined with a larger scale study.

Análisis sobre la formación de residentes en politraumatismos

Training in major trauma management is increasingly important in our country and throughout the world in general, but there is great uncertainty about who treats these patients in our country and how do surgical residents obtain experience in evaluation, diagnosis and treatment of these patients.To find out, from surgery residents, the current state of their training and knowledge of major trauma patient care in our country, and their opinions on how to improve it. At the same time, to analyse whether major trauma patient care in our hospitals has changed in recent years, along with the factors that may influence teaching in how to manage these patients.A survey was sent with a pre-paid envelope to 78 university hospitals accredited for resident training, during the period from March to October 2005.When comparing traditional care of major trauma patients with that of the last 5 years there were no statistically significant differences (p = 0.77). The fact that the hospital is a referral centre for trauma care of trauma does not significantly affect whether the resident feels well-trained (p = 0.7), or well-informed (p = 0.33).General surgery residents do not feel well-trained or well-informed on the management of major trauma patients despite working in hospitals that treat these patients and an increasing number of surgeons are involved in the trauma. There are few lines of research into multiple trauma, despite the linkage with university centres.

The European Trauma Course—From concept to course

The Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) course, developed by the American College of Surgeons, has revolutionised in-hospital management of major trauma patients and is now accepted as a standard of care in many countries worldwide. However, within Europe, there are significant differences in both the aetiology of trauma and the specialties involved in its initial management compared to the American model. Over the past 4 years, there have been a number of initiatives aimed at producing a trauma management course that was evidence based, practical and flexible enough to meet regional European needs and team oriented. Initial attempts tried to incorporate both pre- and in-hospital trauma care. This was eventually rationalised to the production of an in-hospital course and the first pilot course was run in Malta in November 2006. This article describes the evolution of the course, its current structure and plans for the future following the feedback received from candidates and instructors who participated in the first course.

The evolution of an integrated State Trauma System in Victoria, Australia

The incidence of major trauma and associated fatalities in the State of Victoria, Australia, have declined over 20 years following the successful implementation of strategies to modify environmental and behavioural factors that contribute to motor vehicle injuries. However, several system deficiencies in the management of major trauma patients had remained unresolved. To investigate these shortfalls the State Government of Victoria established a task force in 1997 to review trauma and emergency services. The task force adopted the principle of "the right patient to the right hospital in the shortest time" and in 2000 began to deploy an integrated State Trauma System. Implementation of such a system required the designation of specific hospitals of various levels to care for trauma patients; the concentration of trauma expertise at these centres; integration and coordination between the service providers; development of agreed triage and transfer protocols and improved education, training and research programs. A statewide major trauma database was established to enable system monitoring and facilitate further enhancements. The Victorian experience with the development of an integrated trauma system should aid in the development of similar systems nationally and internationally and is described in this paper.

Trauma Management in Australia and the Tyranny of Distance

Major trauma presents a time-critical medical emergency. Successful and expeditious management with early definitive treatment is required to prevent secondary injury. The resources in the prehospital setting, at the hospital of first treatment, and at the tertiary referral (major trauma) center all have an impact on the ability of an integrated trauma system to deliver optimal care to a patient. The time between leaving the injury site and instituting definitive care does not always equate with distance. Retrieval resources must be allocated carefully. Potentially preventable morbidity and mortality has been identified and is specifically related to the time between injury and definitive care and the efficiency of the retrieval and hospital transfer processes. These problems are being addressed with a further sophistication of integrated trauma systems. Regional trauma committees, unified and sophisticated ambulance services, good communication lines, adequate resources at major trauma services, and well developed surgical services are all essential for the appropriate and expeditious management of major trauma patients injured at a distance from tertiary referral (major trauma) centers.