Labor Pain Management Research Articles

Pain Management in Labor: A Literature Review Comparing Anesthetic and Non-Pharmacological Techniques

Pain Management in Labor: A Literature Review Comparing Anesthetic and Non-Pharmacological Techniques

Evaluating Magnesium Sulfate for Labor Pain Management in Primiparous Women

Evaluating Magnesium Sulfate for Labor Pain Management in Primiparous Women

Knowledge Perception and Utilisation of Labour Analgesia Among Antenatal Clinic Attendees in a Tertiary Centre in Makurdi, North-Central Nigeria

Abstract Background: Labour pain management forms an integral part of modern obstetric practice. Despite the availability of various forms of obstetric analgesia in Nigeria, reports indicate poor knowledge, awareness, and utilisation of labour analgesia among the obstetric population. Objective: To determine the knowledge, perception, utilisation, and factors affecting utilisation of labour analgesia among antenatal clinic attendees at the Federal Medical Centre (FMC), Makurdi. Materials and Methods: This was an analytical cross-sectional study conducted among 421 consecutively consenting antenatal patients in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at the FMC, Makurdi, between March 1 to July 31, 2023. Data were collected using an interviewer-guided questionnaire, analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0, and results were presented in textual form and tables. Results: About 47% (199) of the study participants perceived labour pain as the worst possible pain. Only 18.3% (77) of the study participants were knowledgeable about labour analgesia, while just 6.4% (27) of the study participants had ever used it. On multiple logistics regression, the knowledge of labour pain relief (adjusted odd’s ratio [aOR] 0.090, CI = 0.038−0.215, P < 0.001) and mode of previous delivery (aOR 0.292, CI = 0.114−0.750, P < 0.011) were the factors affecting the utilisation of labour analgesia among study participants. Conclusion: There is poor knowledge and utilisation of labour analgesia among antenatal patients. Incorporation of labour analgesia into existing protocols and enhancing health education on labour analgesia as part of antenatal health talks can create awareness of labour analgesia among antenatal patients.

Hydrotherapy During Labor and Birth in Water: A Review of Current Researches

Hydrotherapy is one of the most nonpharmacological methods for pain management in labor, where water at different temperatures is used to treat diseases and reduce pain. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists states that hydrotherapy can be used in the first stage of labor, but there is insufficient evidence on the outcomes of water birth. When the effects of hydrotherapy were examined according to the stages of labor, it was determined that it had an effect on pain, anxiety, comfort level, sympathovagal balance, parenting behavior and active phase duration in the first stage of labor. In the second stage of labor; epidural and opioid use, maternal pain, episiotomy use, intact perineum, shoulder dystocia and duration of labor. In the postpartum period, it has been reported to have an effect on the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage, birth satisfaction and women's sense of autonomy, shorten the duration of hospitalization and increase the rate of breastfeeding. When the effects of water birth on the newborn are examined, it is determined that it has an effect on body temperature, arterial and venous pH, while it has no effect on Apgar. Although there are various studies on water birth in the literature, more studies are needed to obtain evidence-based results. The aim of this review is to examine the current research results of hydrotherapy applied in the first stage of labor and the second stage of labor in water (water birth) in the last 5 years.

Effectiveness of massage therapy intervention for labour pain management during normal delivery: A literature review

Background: Labor and delivery pain is a common experience experienced by women around the world. Women who give birth normally experience significant levels of pain during labor. Efforts to increase knowledge and use of non-pharmacological interventions to manage labor pain, such as massage therapy, still need to be encouraged in pregnant women, various techniques such as deep back massage, effleurage massage, and foot massage have shown promising results in reducing pain experienced during labor. Purpose: To know and analyze effectiveness of massage therapy intervention for labour pain management during normal delivery Method: Literature study using search engine databases, namely ProQuest, Sciencedirect, Pubmed, and Scopus, with article publications ranging from 2018-2024. The literature search strategy involves keywords related to the topic and title of the study: "Massage" OR "foot Massage" OR "reflexiology" AND "Fatigue" AND "Hemodialysis" OR "Chronic Kidney Disease" AND "Randomised Control" OR "Clinical Trial". Results: Obtained 10 articles that show the effect of massage therapy in reducing pain in patients who are undergoing labor and delivery. Conclusion: Massage therapy carried out within a certain time span can effectively reduce pain levels in patients who are undergoing labor and delivery.

Regional anaesthetic techniques in 14 Slovenian obstetric units between 2013 and 2021: where are we and where are we going?

Background: The use of regional anaesthetic techniques for caesarean section and labour analgesia is necessary for quality-driven obstetric anaesthesia as required by European minimum standards for obstetric analgesia and anaesthesia departments, which were issued by the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy in 2020. The aim of this article is to evaluate the rate of caesarean sections performed using regional anaesthetic techniques and the rates of epidural, remifentanil-PCA, and meperidine analgesia for managing labour pain across the 14 Slovenian obstetric units, respectively. Methods: Data from the Slovenian National Perinatal Information System (NPIS) from 2013 to 2021 were analysed. Results: Spinal anaesthesia was used as a primary anaesthetic method (> 50% of elective caesarean sections) in a half of Slovenian obstetric units. For emergency caesarean sections, regional anaesthetic methods (spinal and epidural) were used in > 50% parturients in 3 obstetric units. Eight obstetric units had an epidural rate of >10%. The use of epidural analgesia has progressively increased in 9 of 14 obstetric units. Remifentanil has been routinely used in 6 obstetric units. Accordingly, the consumption of meperidine has dropped in all but one obstetric unit in Slovenia. Conclusion: In the past decade, considerable progress has been observed in obstetric anaesthesia practice in Slovenia. This is evident from the increased use of regional anaesthesia for caesarean section and labour analgesia. However, there are considerable discrepancies in anaesthetic practices between different obstetric units in Slovenia, a situation the parturients should be informed of well in advance to be able to choose the obstetric unit according to their labour and delivery preferences. In order to avoid the differences in the quality and accessibility of anaesthetic practice between units, it is necessary to increase the number of anaesthesiologists involved in obstetric anaesthesia to ensure 24/7 service of labour analgesia to be able to fulfill minimum European standards for obstetric analgesia and anaesthesia departments.

EFFICACY OF LOWER BACK MASSAGE FOR IMPROVEMENT OF LABOR PAIN AND PATIENT SATISFACTION

Labor pain management is crucial to obstetric care, as it influences the labor experience and overall patient satisfaction. Non-pharmacological interventions like lower back massage have been suggested to alleviate labor pain, but their efficacy requires further evaluation. Objective: To assess the efficacy of lower back massage in improving labor pain and patient satisfaction among pregnant women during labor. Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted in the Gynecology and Obstetrics Department of Nishtar Hospital, Multan. A total of 160 pregnant women with single fetuses at full term, cervical dilation of 4 cm or more, and expected to have spontaneous delivery were included. Participants were divided into two groups: the study group (n=80) received sacral massage for 30 minutes at the end of the latent, active, and transition phases during contractions, while the control group (n=80) received standard care. Pain during severe contractions was measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and patient satisfaction was rated on a scale from 1 to 10, with 10 being the most satisfactory. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using a questionnaire. Statistical analysis was performed using appropriate tests, with significance at p<0.05. Results: Significant differences were observed between the groups in VAS scores during labor phases. In the latent phase, mean VAS scores were 4.9 ± 1 in the study group and 6.8 ± 1.5 in the control group (p<0.05). In the active phase, scores were 7.1 ± 2.0 and 9.4 ± 1.4, respectively (p<0.05). During the transition phase, the study group had a lower VAS score of 7.2 ± 3.2 compared to 9.5 ± 2.8 in the control group (p<0.05). The mean satisfaction score was significantly higher in the study group (9 ± 0.9) compared to the control group (7.4 ± 1) (p<0.05). Conclusion: Lower back massage significantly reduces labor pain and enhances patient satisfaction during labor. Massage in standard obstetric care is recommended to improve maternal comfort and labor outcomes.

The effect of dill (Anethum graveolens) seeds on labor pain and progress: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundIn recent years, there has been growing interest in exploring the potential benefits of dill (Anethum graveolens) seeds in managing labor pain and promoting labor progress. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to gather and analyze all available evidence on the efficacy of dill seeds in reducing labor pain and facilitating labor progress. MethodsThe databases of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ScienceDirect have been searched since their inception until June 20, 2023. The risk of bias for clinical trials was evaluated using the Cochrane tool and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) quality assessment tool was used for the evaluation of cohort studies. Meta-analysis was performed on the extracted data. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Chi2 and I2 index. Meta-analyses of all the data were done using RevMan 5.4. ResultsA total of 341 studies were identified through the primary search and after data reduction, finally, five articles remained for assessment. The results showed that the duration of the first stage (MD = −1.71, 95 % CI −2.94--0.48, P = 0.006), second stage (MD = −9.90, 95 % CI −15.51--4.29, p = 0.0005), and third stage (MD = −1.34, 95 % CI −2.14--0.54, p = 0.001) of labor were statistically shorter in the dill seed group, compared with that in the control group. Also, regarding pain intensity during the active stage of labor, the results indicated a favorable outcome for dill seed both overall and in the subgroup analyses of cohort and RCT studies. However, the significant finding was present only in the cohort subgroup (p < 0.00001). ConclusionUsing dill seeds in the active phase of labor in low-risk childbearing women could be an effective and low-cost intervention to reduce labor pain and accelerate labor progress. However, more high-quality clinical trials are needed to provide stronger scientific evidence.

Teknik Counter Pressure Mengurangi Intensitas Nyeri Persalinan Kala I Fase Aktif

Lower back pain is a frequent symptom during pregnancy, often worsening as the pregnancy progresses. The shifting center of gravity, hormonal changes, and increased weight gain associated with pregnancy can contribute to lower back pain and discomfort. While pharmacological interventions are sometimes necessary, there is growing interest in non-pharmacological approaches that may provide relief without potential side effects. Counter pressure is a type of massage that uses your fists to apply constant pressure to the patient's spine during compression. Anti-stress information can also be applied to the lower back in a straight or circular motion. Back compression techniques can relieve back pain during labor contractions. Objective to determine the level of labor pain in the first stage of the active phase of labor in women giving birth at the Rappang Health Center in Sidrap Regency before back massage is carried out with the counter pressure technique. To find out labor pain in the first stage of the active phase of labor in women giving birth at the Rappang Health Center, Sidrap Regency, after doing back massage using a counter pressure technique. The type of research used is pseudo- or quasy-experimental research with a Two-Group Posttest Only design. The relaxation technique obtained a mean rank of 18.25, while the group that underwent counter pressure obtained a value of 6.75. So the average pain in the group that only got the relaxation technique was higher than that done with masse counter pressure with a p value (0.000) &lt;0.05 so it can be concluded that counter pressure massage is effective in reducing pain intensity in laboring mothers. There is an influence of the Counter Pressure massage technique to reduce the intensity of labor pain during the first active phase at the Rappang Health Center, Sidrap Regency. Counter pressure could potentially be a useful technique for managing labor pain.

Effects of Warm Compresses on the Perineal Area During the Active Phase of Labor: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

Background A perineal tear refers to any injury to the female genitalia during labor, which can occur spontaneously or with the use of instruments. An episiotomy, a surgical procedure, is sometimes performed to enlarge the vaginal orifice to facilitate delivery. Ineffective management of labor pain can result in negative physiological and psychosocial outcomes. Objective This study aims to investigate the effect of warm compresses on the perineal area during active labor. Methods This quasi-experimental study utilized a convenience sample, dividing 80 mothers into intervention and control groups. Participants were randomly assigned to groups after meeting the inclusion criteria and signing consent forms. The inclusion criteria encompassed pregnant women aged 18 years or older with a healthy singleton pregnancy, a cephalic presentation, and a gestational age of 37 weeks or more. The women were in the active phase of the first stage of labor (6-7 cm cervical dilation). In Part I, a data collection tool was developed to gather sociodemographic data, obstetrical history, and initial assessment information. Part II assessed perineal pain using the Visual Analogue Scale. Part III collected data on the perineal status post-delivery, and Part IV gathered information about the newborns. The research was conducted in the labor unit at East Jeddah Hospital, with data collection occurring from November 2022 to February 2023. Results The results of this study revealed that the mean second-stage labor pain score was 9.73 for the control group and 8.68 for the intervention group. In the third stage of labor, the mean pain score was 4.52 for the control group and 2.75 for the intervention group. During the fourth stage of labor, the mean pain score for the control group was 2.90, compared to 1.50 for the intervention group. In terms of perineal outcomes, 17 participants (42.5%) in the intervention group had an intact perineum, compared to 11 participants (27.5%) in the control group. However, there was no significant difference in the episiotomy rate between the two groups. Conclusions The findings of this study indicate that applying a warm compress to the perineal area during active labor can enhance perineal intactness and significantly reduce perineal pain. Future research could explore the challenges nurses encounter when applying warm compresses to the perineum during labor.

Buscopan and contemporary obstetric care – A therapeutic adjunct to management of cervical dystocia, uterine inversion and unremitting pain in labour

No abstract available

Dexmedetomidine Or Fentanyl as An Adjuvant to Single Low-Dose Bupivacaine Intrathecal Anesthesia for Management of Normal Labor Pain, A Randomized Control Study

Dexmedetomidine Or Fentanyl as An Adjuvant to Single Low-Dose Bupivacaine Intrathecal Anesthesia for Management of Normal Labor Pain, A Randomized Control Study

A Randomised Clinical Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine-Ropivacaine Versus Fentanyl-Ropivacaine for Epidural Labour Analgesia.

Background An epidural block is a superior potent approach to labour analgesia, and ropivacaine combined with fentanyl has been successfully practised for it. Dexmedetomidine, as a novel form of labour analgesia, must be researched further. Our study results give insight into the epidural block and come up with a pioneering approach for labour analgesia. Methodology A total of 68 parturients were assigned to two equal groups and received either dexmedetomidine with ropivacaine (Group RD) or fentanylwith ropivacaine (Group RF). Parturients received a loading dose and maintenance was given using a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump. Analgesia onset time, labour duration, rescue dose requirement, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores were noted. Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity and Respiration (APGAR) scores of newborns, Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) scores of mothers, and maternal side effects were observed. Results Group RDshowed a shorter onset time of analgesia (group RD: 12.50 ± 1.31 minutes vs. group RF: 15.26 ± 1.46 min), less local anaesthetics requirement (group RD: 47.54 ±5.37 ml vs. group RF: 59.05 ± 6.62 ml), less number of bolus doses (group RD: 0.15 ± 0.36 vs. group RF: 1.21 ± 0.95), and shorter duration from the epidural administration to the delivery (group RD: 312.97 ± 42.40 minutes vs. group RF: 345.94 ±14.67 minutes) than group RF. VAS values of the RD group were significantly less than the RF group. The RSS scores were comparably low in both groups, and excessive sedation was not seen in any group. Newborn APGAR values were comparably on the higher side in the two groups. Adverse effects were observed in the two groups, like hypotension, nausea/vomiting, bradycardia, shivering, and pruritus, which were insignificant. Conclusion The RD group showed an improved analgesic effect with a quicker onset of action,reduced requirement of local anaesthetics, and lower VAS scores compared to the RF group. With ropivacaine, dexmedetomidine shows more efficacy than fentanyl during epidural block and is a safe alternative for labour pain management.

“…We never considered it important…”: a qualitative study on perceived barriers on use of non-pharmacological methods in management of labour pain by nurse-midwives in eastern Tanzania

BackgroundA significant number of women experience labour without effective pain management and thus suffer from unbearable labour pain to the extent they term labour as the most agonizing event in their lives. Unresolved labour pain can lead to stress, fear, and confusion, which may compromise placental perfusion and lead to birth asphyxia. Although various pharmacological and non-pharmacological labour pain management methods exist, the use of non-pharmacological methods (NPMs) to manage labour pain has remained low in low-resource settings. This paper explored the barriers for using NPMs to manage labour pain by nurse-midwives in eastern Tanzania.MethodsWe conducted an exploratory qualitative study with 18 nurse-midwives purposefully recruited from the labour wards of two selected district hospitals in eastern Tanzania. Qualitative content analysis guided the data analysis.ResultsTwo categories illustrating barriers to using NPMs were generated: individual-level and institutional-level barriers. Individual-level barriers include (i) limited competencies of nurse-midwives on the use of NPMs for managing labour pain, (ii) inadequate exposure to labour pain management practices, (iii) misconceptions about labour pain relief, and (iv) a lack of opportunities for knowledge acquisition. The institutional barriers include (i) a critical staff shortage amidst many clients and (ii) an unfavourable healthcare facility environment.ConclusionThe implementation of NPMs for labour pain management by nurse-midwives in eastern Tanzania faces several institutional and individual barriers. We recommend addressing both supply- and demand-side barriers. Strengthening nurse midwives’ competencies in NPMs adoption and use and improving the facility environment to ensure privacy during labour can be a starting point for addressing supply-side issues. We recommend dispelling myths and misconceptions through health promotion education to address demand-side barriers.

Determinants and willingness to practice obstetric analgesia among women attending antenatal clinic at Dr. Bogalech Gebre Memorial General Hospital Central Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study

BackgroundLabor pain is uniquely experienced and described by the woman giving birth, and it is often considered one of the most excruciating experiences for many women. This study aimed to evaluate factors associated with the willingness to receive labor analgesia among women attending the antenatal clinic at Dr. Bogalech Gebre Memorial General Hospital Central Ethiopia in 2022.MethodsAn institution-based, cross-sectional study was conducted from January to March 2022. Data were collected using semi-structured questionnaires by a convenience sampling technique. Data was entered in EpiData 4.2 and exported to SPSS version 20 for analysis. Both Bivariable and multivariable logistic regressions were conducted to determine factors associated with pregnant women’s willingness to choose labor analgesia. Crude odds ratio (COR) and adjusted odds ratio (AOR) were computed to assess the association between variables.ResultsA total of 398 pregnant women have participated in the study with a response rate of 94%. Nearly 30%, (29.4%) of the pregnant women had a willingness to practice labor pain management. Being a housewife (AOR: 8.35, 95% CI: 2.07, 33.63). Women who live in urban (AOR: 2.60, 95% CI: 1.29, 5.29). Having had awareness about labor analgesia (AOR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.00, 2.60) and the short duration of labor time (AOR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.15, 2.96) were statistically significant with a willingness to practice labor analgesia.ConclusionWe conclude that the willingness of pregnant mothers’ toward obstetric analgesia practice was low in the study area. Being a housewife, urban residence, awareness about labor analgesia, and short duration of labor were statistically significant with the willingness of the mothers to practice labor analgesia. To increase willingness to use labor analgesia, authorities should prioritize delivering health education on pain management choices to address concerns and promote effective methods and practices.

Assessment of Pain Management in Labour and Midwives Perspectives in Hospital Used Damaturu Yobe State

Assessment of Pain Management in Labour and Midwives Perspectives in Hospital Used Damaturu Yobe State

Are expectations of labour and birth fulfilled? A qualitative investigation of first‐time parents

AbstractAimTo describe if first‐time parents' expectations of labour and birth, explored during the third trimester of pregnancy, were fulfilled or not when investigated 1 year following birth.DesignQualitative Husserlian phenomenological approach.MethodsThe sample comprises 10 parents (five couples), who participated in an online semi‐structured audio‐recorded individual interview conducted 1 year after birth, between September 2020 and October 2020. Parents' expectations of labour and birth, described throughout a focus group discussion on pregnancy, were compared with their experience explored 1 year after birth. A thematic analysis was adopted and member checking was used to validate participants' thoughts.ResultsParticipants gave birth in a II level maternity unit and one‐to‐one midwifery care was provided. Although during the focus group conducted in pregnancy, women reported being aware of the unpredictable nature of childbirth, they expressed sadness and failure after experiencing some unexpected interventions. The midwife was a reassuring guide, as expected; however, sometimes, the communication was not effective, and women perceived lack of support. Some women partly blame themselves for not being prepared to manage labour pain, which hurt more than expected. Feeling of uncertainty about events were experienced in relation to seeking care at an early stage of labour, which confirmed the fears expressed during pregnancy. During the antenatal focus group discussion, fathers doubted they could be helpful for the labouring women. This negative emotion was confirmed after birth. However, they understood the importance to be present and to support their partner.ConclusionsOne year after birth, participants had consistent memories of their birth experience. Professionals might identify fundamental components of quality maternity care that are meaningful for parents, with the potential to generate a long‐term positive health impact on them. Respectful maternity care should be ensured through a family‐centred approach, with the aim to promote satisfaction.Implications for the Profession and/or Patient CareThe study highlights the importance of taking parents' expectations into account when providing antenatal care to tailor individualized support that addresses their distinct needs and preferences. Healthcare professionals might consider initiating a post‐natal discussion with parents to assess whether their needs and perspectives have been addressed. This perspective may present valuable insights to achieve long‐term positive outcomes, provide high‐quality maternity care, address issues and make improvements.ImpactThe study showed that 1 year after birth, parents can accurately recall their birth. They might also give significant insights into fundamental components of care that they value as crucial to shape a positive birthing experience. Professionals should use this information to build solutions, promoting long‐term well‐being for parents. Respectful interactions and trusting relationships emerged as key elements in parents' experience. A midwifery care focused on parents' needs may contribute to the achievement of positive birth memories.Reporting MethodThis study used the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist.Patient or Public ContributionNo patient or public contribution.

Management of Labor Pain: Non-pharmacological and Pharmacological Interventions for Pain Control During Childbirth

Management of Labor Pain: Non-pharmacological and Pharmacological Interventions for Pain Control During Childbirth

Comparative efficacy of opioid and non-opioid analgesics in labor pain management: A network meta-analysis.

Effective labor pain management is crucial for parturient well-being, as it can improve the delivery experience of pregnant women and reduce anxiety and tension. This systematic review and network meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of various analgesics, classified by drug category and individual treatment methods, for labor pain control. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. All searches commenced from the database's inception to the date of the literature search (May 31, 2023). The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool assessed study bias risk. Network meta-analyses using a random-effects model and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were performed. Fifteen randomized controlled trials evaluating analgesic interventions in ASA I or II parturients were included. Combination therapies (OR: 5.81; 95% CI, 3.76-7.84; probability: 60%) and non-opioid analgesics (OR: 5.61; 95% CI, 2.91-8.30; probability: 39.2%) were superior to placebo for labor pain relief. Specifically, dexmedetomidine/ropivacaine/sufentanil (OR: 7.32; 95% CI, 2.73-11.89; probability: 40.6%) and dexmedetomidine/ropivacaine (OR: 6.50; 95% CI, 2.51-10.33; probability: 11.9%) combinations, bupivacaine/fentanyl and ropivacaine/sufentanil combinations, and remifentanil monotherapy showed improved analgesic efficacy versus placebo. Dexmedetomidine/ropivacaine reduced parturient nausea and vomiting versus alternatives. Non-opioids, opioids and combinations thereof effectively relieved labor pain. In addition, dexmedetomidine/ropivacaine combination demonstrated analgesic efficacy and lower nausea and vomiting incidence.

Comparative Analysis of Therapeutic Showers and Bathtubs for Pain Management and Labor Outcomes-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Hydrotherapy, including the use of therapeutic showers and bathtubs, has been studied for its potential benefits in labor pain management. Previous research has indicated that hydrotherapy can alleviate pain, but comparative studies between therapeutic showers and bathtubs are scarce. Objective: This study aims to compare the effects of therapeutic showers and bathtubs on pain perception, labor duration, use of epidural analgesia, and maternal and neonatal outcomes during labor. Methods: A total of 124 pregnant women were included in this study. Participants were divided into two groups: those who used a therapeutic shower and those who used a bathtub during labor. Pain levels were measured using a visual analog scale (VAS). Labor duration, use of epidural analgesia, types of delivery, maternal outcomes (postpartum hemorrhage, perineal status, maternal hypotension, fever, and breastfeeding), and neonatal outcomes (APGAR scores, fetal heart rate, complications, and neonatal unit admissions) were recorded and analyzed. Results: Both the therapeutic shower and the bathtub effectively reduced pain perception, with the bathtub showing a greater reduction in VAS scores. The therapeutic shower group experienced a significantly shorter labor duration compared to the bathtub group. The majority of participants in both groups did not require epidural analgesia, with no significant differences between the groups. There were no significant differences in the types of delivery. Maternal outcomes indicated a lower incidence of perineal tears and episiotomies in the therapeutic shower group. Neonatal outcomes, including APGAR scores and fetal heart rate, were similar between the groups, with no significant differences in complications or neonatal unit admissions. Conclusions: Both therapeutic showers and bathtubs are effective for pain relief during labor, with the bathtub showing a higher reduction in pain intensity. The therapeutic shower is associated with a shorter labor duration and a lower incidence of perineal tears and episiotomies. Both methods are safe for neonatal well-being, making hydrotherapy a viable non-pharmacological option for pain management in labor. However, the therapeutic shower may offer additional benefits in terms of labor duration and maternal outcomes.