Management Of Hemorrhoidal Disease Research Articles

An international observational study assessing conservative management in hemorrhoidal disease: results of CHORALIS (aCute HemORrhoidal disease evALuation International Study).

Aim: Real-world evidence on the management of hemorrhoidal disease (HD) is limited. This international study collected clinical practice data on the effectiveness of conservative treatments for acute HD on symptoms and quality of life (QoL), providing perspectives of treatment modalities from different continents. Patients & methods: The 4-week observational prospective CHORALIS study involved adult outpatients consulting for spontaneous complaints of hemorrhoids (graded using Goligher classification) and prescribed conservative treatments according to usual clinical practice. Assessments were: anal pain/discomfort (visual analog scale [VAS]), other signs/symptoms (patient questionnaire), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) questionnaire and disease-specific QoL (HEMO-FISS-QoL questionnaire). Results: Of 3592 participants, 3505 were analyzed (58.4% male; age 40.5±13.7years; history of HD in 48.4%; 72.1% Goligher grade I and II). Pain and discomfort were the most common symptoms. Most treatments were venoactive drugs (VADs; 90.9%), particularly micronized purified flavonoid fraction (MPFF; 73.7%) and diosmin (14.6%). All VAD-based therapies improved signs/symptoms (number/intensity/frequency of pain, discomfort, bleeding, swelling, itching and soiling) and QoL. MPFF was associated with a significantly greater proportion of patients with no symptoms (48.8 vs diosmin 34.4%, p<0.001), pain disappearance (69.7 vs diosmin 52.8%, p<0.001), treatment impact at 1week rated on PGI-C as 'very much better' (30.5 vs diosmin 17.9%, p<0.001) and shorter times to improvement (mean±SD 3.9±1.5days vs diosmin 4.2±1.7days). Conclusion: In this prospective real-world study of patients with acute HD, conservative therapies consisting mainly of VADs, including MPFF, improved the clinical signs and symptoms of disease, as well as QoL. This study evidence supports clinical advantages associated with VADs, mostly MPFF, for effectively managing acute HD.

French multicentre prospective evaluation of radiofrequency ablation in the management of haemorrhoidal disease

PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the management of haemorrhoidal disease with 1 year’s follow-up.MethodThis prospective multicentre study assessed RFA (Rafaelo©) in outpatients with grade II–III haemorrhoids. RFA was performed in the operating room under locoregional or general anaesthesia. Primary endpoint was the evolution of a quality-of-life score adapted to the haemorrhoid pathology (HEMO-FISS-QoL) 3 months after surgery. Secondary endpoints were evolution of symptoms (prolapsus, bleeding, pain, itching, anal discomfort), complications, postoperative pain and medical leave.ResultsA total of 129 patients (69% men, median age 49 years) were operated on in 16 French centres. Median HEMO-FISS-QoL score dropped significantly from 17.4/100 to 0/100 (p < 0.0001) at 3 months. At 3 months, the rate of patients reporting bleeding (21% vs. 84%, p < 0.001), prolapse (34% vs. 91.3%, p < 0.001) and anal discomfort (0/10 vs. 5/10, p < 0.0001) decreased significantly. Median medical leave was 4 days [1–14]. Postoperative pain was 4/10, 1/10, 0/10 and 0/10 at weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4. Seven patients (5.4%) were reoperated on by haemorrhoidectomy for relapse, and three for complications. Reported complications were haemorrhage (3), dysuria (3), abscess (2), anal fissure (1), external haemorrhoidal thrombosis (10), pain requiring morphine (11). Degree of satisfaction was high (+ 5 at 3 months on a − 5/+ 5 scale).ConclusionRFA is associated with an improvement in quality of life and symptoms with a good safety profile. As expected for minimally invasive surgery, postoperative pain is minor with short medical leave.Clinical trial registration and dateClinical trial NCT04229784 (18/01/2020).

The role of the Rafaelo procedure in the management of hemorrhoidal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The aim of this study was to summarize the current evidence regarding the role of the Rafaelo procedure in the management of hemorrhoidal disease (HD). This study was based on the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A literature search was performed (Medline, Scopus, CENTRAL, and Web of Science) from inception to 25/09/2022. Grey literature databases were also reviewed. The primary endpoint was the pooled complications rate of the Rafaelo procedure in patients with HD. Secondary endpoints included short- (bleeding, pain, thrombosis, necrosis, urinary retention, fever, oedema, anal fissure, and readmission) and long-term (stenosis, meteorism, constipation, anal tags, anal hyposensibility, reoperation, and recurrence) postoperative complication rates. Both prospective and retrospective studies were considered. Quality evaluation was performed via the ROBINS-I tool. Certainty of Evidence was based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Overall, 6 non-randomized studies and 327 patients were included. The overall complication rate was 17.6% (95% CI 8.8-26.3%). Short-term complications were bleeding (7.5%, 95% CI 2.5-12.5%), thrombosis (2.2%, 95% CI 0.4-4.8%), and pain (1.6%, 95% CI 0.2-3.3%). Reoperation and recurrence rates were 1.8% (95% CI 0.3-3.4%) and 4.8% (95% CI 1.2-8.4%), respectively. A significant improvement in the presenting symptoms was noted. Method approval and patient satisfaction rates were 89.1% (95% CI 81.7-96.6%) and 95% (95% CI 89.8-100%), correspondingly. Overall CoE was "Very Low". Further randomized controlled trials are required to delineate the exact role of the Rafaelo procedure in HD.

Recommendations and best practice on the management of hemorrhoidal disease in Saudi Arabia

ABSTRACT Background Several techniques were developed for managing hemorrhoidal disease, but their use in clinical practice and the general management of the condition seems highly variable in Saudi Arabia. Consensus panel To develop consensus recommendations that ensure the best possible diagnosis and treatment of hemorrhoidal disease in Saudi Arabia, the consensus panel consisted of experts in surgery in Saudi Arabia who met from December 2017 to September 2018. Consensus findings The discussions focused on the need: to set up a proctology society in Saudi Arabia to assess the prevalence of hemorrhoidal disease and to regulate the role of health-care professionals (HCPs) in the management of the disease; to initiate guidelines to ensure proper diagnosis (considering symptoms, medical history, and physical/clinical examination) and treatment (topical creams and suppositories should be limited as no strong evidence supports their efficacy); to educate patients on diet and lifestyle modifications using education materials and social media during and after the treatment (regular physical activity, drinking enough fluids, regular meal time with food rich in fibers, and regular bowel habit with non-straining defecation); to refer patients to a general/colorectal surgeon when needed; and to teach junior surgeons the best use of surgical techniques. Conclusion These recommendations can be a step forward toward a recognized guidance for all HCPs in Saudi Arabia for a better management of hemorrhoidal disease. They will be of a great value for general practitioners, family medicine doctors, junior surgeons, and pharmacists who are the gate keepers and first contact with patients.

IS IT POSSIBLE TO OPTIMIZE STAPLED HEMORRHOIDOPEXY OUTCOMES BY ENLARGING OPERATIVE CRITERIA INDICATIONS? RESULTS OF A TAILORED PROCEDURE WITH ASSOCIATED RESECTION IN A COMPARATIVE PERSONAL SERIES.

Since its introduction, stapled hemorrhoidopexy has been increasingly indicated in the management of hemorrhoidal disease. Our primary end point was to evaluate the incidence of recurrent disease requiring another surgical intervention. On a secondary analysis, we also compared pain, complications, and patient's satisfaction after a tailored surgery. We retrospectively reviewed 196 patients (103 males and 93 females) with a median age of 47.9 years (range, 17-78) who were undergoing stapled hemorrhoidopexy alone (STG; n=65) or combined surgery (CSG; n=131, stapled hemorrhoidopexy associated with resection). Complications were detected in 11 (5.6%) patients (4.6% for STG vs. 6.1% for CSG; p=0.95). At the same time, symptoms recurrence (13.8% vs. 8.4%; p=034), reoperation rate for complications (3.1% vs. 3.0%; p=1.0), and reoperation rate for recurrence (6.1% vs. 4.6%; p=1.0) were not different among groups. Grade IV patients were more commonly managed with simultaneous stapling and resection (63% vs. 49.5%), but none of them presented symptoms recurrence nor need reoperation due to recurrence. Median pain score during the first week was higher in CSG patients (0.8 vs. 1.7). After a follow-up of 24.9 months, satisfaction scores were similar (8.6; p=0.8). Recurrent symptoms were observed in 10% of patients, requiring surgery in approximately half of them. Even though the association of techniques may raise pain scores, a tailored approach based on amplified indication criteria and combined techniques seems to be an effective and safe alternative, with decreased relapse rates in patients suffering from more advanced hemorrhoidal disease. Satisfaction scores after hemorrhoidopexy are high.

Maladie hémorroïdaire en 2022 : comment choisir le traitement adapté ?

Hemorrhoidal disease is frequent and can lead to major alteration of quality of life. Conservative treatment, instrumental therapies and surgical approach play a complementary role in the management of hemorrhoidal disease. Understanding all techniques is mandatory to guide the patient and offer the best individualized treatment. Guidelines issued by scientific societies can facilitate the therapeutic decision.

Office-Based Procedures in the Management of Hemorrhoidal Disease: Rubber Band Ligation versus Sclerotherapy – Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: The most frequently used office-based procedures in hemorrhoidal disease (HD) are rubber band ligation (RBL) and sclerotherapy. Few studies have been published comparing the various types of instrumental therapy. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of sclerotherapy and RBL. Methods: Three online databases were searched. Efficacy (control of symptoms, prolapse, bleeding and pain, patients’ satisfaction, and disease recurrence) and safety (complications, such as pain and bleeding) were the assessed outcomes. Pooled relative risks (RR) were computed for each outcome using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed by Cochran’s Q test and I2. Results: Six RCTs and three cohort studies were included. Control of prolapse and bleeding was significantly higher with RBL (93.1% RBL vs. 66.4% sclerotherapy, RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.12–1.60 and 89.1% RBL vs. 78.7% SCL, RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.02–1.34, respectively). Both techniques had similar results in terms of pain relief, overall control of symptoms, and risk of recurrence at 3 months. Although patient satisfaction was significantly higher with RBL (77.8% RBL vs. 46.7% sclerotherapy, RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.01–2.50), post-procedural pain was significantly higher with this technique (24% RBL vs. 14% sclerotherapy, RR 1.74, 95% CI 1.32–2.28). There was no significant difference regarding post-procedure bleeding (11.1% RBL vs. 8.7% sclerotherapy, RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.86–1.94). In the subgroup analysis, according to the HD grade, post-procedure pain was higher with RBL only in HD grade II (vs. HD grade I–III). Conclusions: RBL performs better than sclerotherapy in controlling HD symptoms, specifically prolapse and bleeding, although post-procedural pain is a frequent complication. Recurrence is similar with both procedures. While waiting for the publication of results with sclerotherapy with new sclerosants, RBL remains the office-based treatment of choice in HD.

Management of hemorrhoidal disease: new generation of oral and topical treatments.

Hemorrhoidal disease is a widespread proctologic clinical entity. Even if surgical excision is an effective treatment, it only represents the standard procedure for patients with high-grade hemorrhoids. Considering that most cases are grade I or II hemorrhoids, oral or topical therapies are widely used despite, currently, there are no satisfactory options for these kinds of treatments. The pathology involves the degeneration of the supporting tissue of the anal cushions, causing venous dilation, blood stagnation, formation of edematous venous plexus covered by mucosa and inflammation. An effective treatment must, therefore, be multi-targeted and capable of acting on all the pathological mechanisms simultaneously. During the 8th National Congress of the Italian Association of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR), some clinical evidence of hemorrhoidal disease has been discussed along with new opportunities in oral and topical treatment options. Among these, the effectiveness and the safety of two innovative products, a sublingual nanoemulsion and a liquid bandage, has been reported.

Safety and Efficacy of Proctosoll Allevia in the Management of Haemorrhoidal Disease in Adults: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.

Hemorrhoidal Disease (HD) is a very common anorectal disorder that affects millions of people around the world and represents a major medical and socioeconomic problem. The aim of the present study was to assess the safety and efficacy of Proctosoll Allevia® in patients affected by symptomatic HD in comparison with the results obtained from a control group. From January to February 2019, all the patients referred to the outpatient clinic of Rajalakshmi Hospital, who were complaining of first or second degree hemorrhoidal symptoms, were enrolled in the study. They were randomly assigned to either of the 2 arms. Group 1: patients were treated with the Proctosoll Allevia® and were under a controlled diet. Group 2: patients were only under a controlled diet without any treatment - control group. A total of 51 subjects were screened and 45 (13 F- 32 M) enrolled in the study. All the patients treated with topical application of the cream showed a statistically significant improvement of symptoms within 14 days from the beginning of the therapy if compared to patients who were treated only with a controlled diet. No major adverse events associated with the use of the new product were recorded. The treatment of I-II degree symptomatic HD with Proctosoll Allevia® has demonstrated to be promising with a good profile of tolerability, safety and efficacy.

The Management of Hemorrhoidal Disease by Dearterialization and Mucopexy.

Several minimally invasive surgical procedures have been recently developed to treat hemorrhoids without any excision. About 25 years ago, a non-excisional procedure providing doppler- guided ligation of the hemorrhoidal arteries has been proposed - named "hemorrhoidal dearterialization". The original technique has been modified over the years, and indications were expanded. In particular, a plication of the redundant and prolapsing mucosa/submucosa of the rectum (named "mucopexy") has been introduced to treat hemorrhoidal prolapse, without excision of the hemorrhoidal piles. At present, the THD® Doppler procedure is one of the most used techniques to treat hemorrhoids. Aim of this technique is to realize a target dearterialization, using a Doppler probe with the final purpose to reduce the arterial overflow to the hemorrhoidal piles. In the case of associated hemorrhoidal prolapse, a mucopexy is performed together with Doppler-guided dearterialization. The entity and circumferential extension of the hemorrhoidal prolapse guide the mucopexy, which can be considered tailored to a single patient; the dearterialization should be considered mandatory. Advantages of this surgical technique are the absence of serious and life-threatening postoperative events, chronic complications, and limited recurrence risks. The impact of the procedure on the anorectal physiology is negligible. However, careful postoperative management is mandatory to avoid complications and to guarantee an improved long-term outcome. Therefore, regular physiologic bowel movements, excessive strain at the defecation and strong physical activity are advisable.

Management of Hemorrhoidal Disease in Special Conditions: A Word of Caution.

Hemorrhoids are a common disease that is often considered an easy problem to solve. Unfortunately, some particular clinical conditions, including Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD), pregnancy, immunosuppression, coagulopathy, cirrhosis with portal hypertension, and proctitis after radiotherapy, challenge hemorrhoids management and the outcomes. Research and online contents related to hemorrhoids' treatment in special conditions are reviewed in order to help colorectal surgeons in daily practice. There are very limited data about the outcomes of hemorrhoids treatment in these subgroups of patients. Patients in pregnancy can be effectively treated with medical therapy, reserving surgical intervention in highly selected and urgent cases. In case of thrombosed haemorrhoids, the excision allows a fast symptoms' resolution, with a low incidence of recurrence and a long remission interval. In case of immunosuppressed patients, there is no consensus for the best treatment, even in most HIV positive patients, a surgical procedure can be safely proposed when indicated. There is no sufficient data in the literature related to transplanted patients. The surgical treatment of hemorrhoids in patients with IBD, especially Crohn's Disease, can be unsafe, although there is a paucity of literature on this topic. In case of previous pelvic radiotherapy, it must always be considered that severe complications, like abscesses and fistulas with subsequent pelvic and retroperitoneal sepsis, can occur after surgical treatment of hemorrhoids, so a conservative treatment is advocated. Moreover, caution is recommended in treating patients with coagulopathy, considering possible complications (mostly bleeding) also after outpatient treatments. In case of portal hypertension and cirrhosis, a 'conservative treatment' is recommended. Bleeding hemorrhoids can be treated with hemorrhoidectomy when they do not respond to other treatments. International literature is very scant about the treatment of patients affected by hemorrhoids in particular situations. A word of caution and concern even about the indication for minor outpatient procedures must be expressed in these patients, in order to avoid possible life-threatening complications. The first-line treatment is the conservative medical approach associated with the treatment of the primary disease.

Postoperative discomfort and pain in the management of hemorrhoidal disease: laser hemorrhoidoplasty, a minimal invasive treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids.

Hemorrhoidal disease (HD) treatment still remains controversial. In fact, despite many surgical progresses, postoperative pain, and discomfort remain the major weaknesses. Laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) is a minimal invasive procedure for HD treatment determining the shrinkage of the hemorrhoidal piles by diode laser. The aim of the current study is to analyze the feasibility and efficacy of LHP in patients with II-III degrees hemorrhoids. Consecutive patients with II-III degree hemorrhoids were enrolled in the study and underwent an LHP treatment using a 1470-nm diode laser. Operative time, postoperative pain and complications, resolution of symptoms, and length of return to daily activity were prospectively evaluated. Recurrence of prolapsed hemorrhoid or symptoms at a minimum follow-up of 6months was evaluated. Fifty patients (28 males and 22 females) were enrolled in the study. No significant intraoperative complications occurred. Postoperative pain score (at 12, 18, and 24h postoperatively), evaluated through visual analogue scale, was extremely low (mean value 2). No postoperative spontaneous bleeding occurred. The 100% of our population came back to daily activity 2 days after surgery. At a mean follow-up period of 8.6months, we reported a recurrence rate of 0%. LHP demonstrated a large efficacy in selected patients. The greatest strength points were low postoperative pain, the presence of slightly significant peri-anal wounds, no special anal hygienic measures and low surgical time. Thus, resulting in a negligible postoperative discomfort, LHP could be considered a painless and minimal invasive technique in the treatment of HD.

The efficacy and tolerability of Avaricon® hemor medical preparation in the treatment of hemorrhoids compared to placebo – a prospective double blind randomized clinical study

Introduction. Despite the high incidence of hemorrhoidal disease and the widespread use of numerous topical preparations, there is still a lack of information regarding their efficacy. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of a new topical medical preparation containing sodium hyaluronate, calendula extract, hamamelis extract and mentha piperita essential oil as major components. Material and Methods. This prospective double-blind randomized clinical study included 49 patients with a diagnosis of hemorrhoidal disease. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups: Avaricon? group that included patients who applied 0.20% Avaricon? Hemor and a placebo group who applied placebo during 2 weeks. The effects of Avaricon? Hemor on the symptoms of hemorrhoidal disease, its safety, tolerability as well as compliance and adherence of study patients were analyzed. Results. Our results showed that Avaricon? Hemor was significantly superior to placebo in controlling most symptoms of hemorrhoidal disease. Conclusion. The tested medical agent showed to be effective with good tolerability and safety profile indicating its possible use in various therapeutic protocols in the management of hemorrhoidal disease.

A national evaluation of the management practices of hemorrhoidal disease in the Netherlands

PurposeIn this study, we describe current practices in the management of hemorrhoidal disease in the Netherlands.MethodsA validated online survey was performed among Dutch surgeons and residents treating hemorrhoidal disease. Contact details were retrieved from the Dutch Association for Surgery resulting in 619 contacts. Only doctors who were treating hemorrhoidal disease regularly were asked to complete the questionnaire. The following items were assessed: initial treatment, recurrence, complications, and follow-up.ResultsIn total, 133 respondents completed the survey. Ninety percent of the respondents started with rubber band ligation (RBL) as the first treatment in low-grade hemorrhoidal disease. In case of recurrence, 64% of the respondents repeated RBL three times before switching to a more invasive treatment modality. In grade III hemorrhoidal disease, the respondents preferred more invasive techniques: a sutured hemorrhoidopexy was performed in 24%, Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation (DG-HAL) in 9%, stapled hemorrhoidopexy in 19%, and the traditional hemorrhoidectomy in 31% of the patients, respectively. The majority of the respondents (39%) reported a mild complication in 5–10% of the patients. The most reported complication was pain. Nearly all the respondents (98%) reported a major complication in less than 5% of the patients. The majority of the patients (57%) were seen in outpatient clinics 6 weeks post-treatment.ConclusionThis Dutch survey showed areas of common practice for primary treatment of hemorrhoidal disease. However, it also demonstrated varying practices regarding recurrent hemorrhoidal disease. Practical guidelines are required to support colorectal surgeons in the Netherlands.

Aluminum potassium sulfate and tannic acid sclerotherapy for Goligher Grades II and III hemorrhoids: Results from a multicenter study.

To show that aluminum potassium sulfate and tannic acid (ALTA) sclerotherapy has a high success rate for Grade II and III hemorrhoids. This study was based on the clinical data of 604 patients with hemorrhoids who underwent ALTA sclerotherapy between January 2009 and February 2015. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of this treatment for Grades II and III hemorrhoids. Preoperative and postoperative symptoms, complications and success rate were all assessed retrospectively. Follow-up consisted of a simple questionnaire, physical examination and an anoscopy. Patients were followed-up at one day, one week, two weeks, one month, one year, two years, three years, four years and five years after the ALTA sclerotherapy. One hundred and sixty-nine patients were diagnosed with Grade II hemorrhoids and 435 patients were diagnosed with Grade III hemorrhoids. The one year, three year and five year cumulative success rates of ALTA sclerotherapy for Grades II and III hemorrhoids were 95.9% and 93.1%; 89.3% and 83.7%; and 89.3% and 78.2%, respectively. No significant differences were observed in the cumulative success rates after ALTA sclerotherapy between Grades II and III hemorrhoids (P = 0.09). There were forty-seven post-operative complications (low grade fever; anal pain; urinary retention; rectal ulcer; and others). No serious or life-threatening complications occurred and all cases improved through conservative treatment. At univariate analysis there were no predictive factors of failure. ALTA sclerotherapy has had a high success rate for Grade II and III hemorrhoids during five years of post-operative treatment. However, additional studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of this ALTA sclerotherapy in the management of hemorrhoidal disease.

Emborrhoid: a new concept for the treatment of hemorrhoids with arterial embolization: the first 14 cases.

The 'emborrhoid' technique consists of the embolization of the hemorrhoidal arteries. The endovascular arterial occlusion is performed using coils placed in the terminal branches of the superior rectal arteries. The emborrhoid technique has been modeled after elective transanal Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation which has been shown to be effective in hemorrhoidal disease. We report the first 14 cases of our experience with emborrhoid technique. Fourteen patients with disabling chronic rectal bleeding were treated using the emborrhoid technique (3 women, 11 men). The stage of the hemorrhoidal disease was II (10 patients), III (3), and IV (1). This treatment was decided by a multidisciplinary team (proctologist, visceral surgeon, and radiologist). Seven patients underwent previous proctological surgery. Ten patients had coagulation disorders (anticoagulants or cirrhosis). Superior rectal arteries were embolized with pushable microcoils (0.018). Technical success of the embolization procedure was 100 %. Clinical success at 1 month was 72 % (10/14). Of the 4 patients who experienced rebleeding, two underwent additional embolization of the posterior rectal arteries with success. No pain or ischemic complications were observed in 13 patients. One patient experienced a temporary painful and edematous, perianal reaction. Our case studies suggest that coil embolization of the superior rectal arteries is technically feasible, safe and well tolerated. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of this new 'emborrhoid' technique in the management of hemorrhoidal disease.

The tissue selecting technique (TST) versus the Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsing hemorrhoids: a retrospective case–control study

Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (MMH) is the procedure of choice in the management of hemorrhoidal disease. However, this procedure is associated with significant postoperative pain. Tissue selecting technique (TST) is a segmental stapled hemorrhoidopexy, which aims to reduce the postoperative pain, rectovaginal fistula (RVF) and rectal stenosis. The aim of the present study was to compare the clinical outcomes between TST and MMH. A case-control study was undertaken to investigate the difference in clinical characteristics between the patients treated with TST and those treated with MMH. Intraoperative and postoperative parameters in both groups were collected and compared. One hundred and ninety-five eligible patients underwent either TST (n=121) or MMH (n=74). The pain score was significantly less in the TST group than that in the MMH group at the first defecation and at 12h, day 3 and day 7 postoperatively (P=0.001). Further analysis revealed that, at the time point of 12h, day 3, day 7 and during first defecation, the pain score in the TST group and TST+STE group was less than that in the MMH group (P=0.001). No patient in either group developed postoperative rectal stenosis. Furthermore, no case of RVF was identified in the TST group. The 1-year recurrence rate was 3.3% (4/121) and 2.7% (2/74), respectively, in TST and MMH groups (P=1.0). The 1-year recurrence rate after TST and MMH for the treatment of patients with grade III-IV hemorrhoids is similar. It is encouraging that TST is associated with less postoperative pain and no RVF or rectal stenosis.

Comparison of transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation and stapled haemorrhoidopexy in management of haemorrhoidal disease: a retrospective study and literature review.

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation (THD) and stapled haemorrhoidopexy [also called procedure for prolapsed haemorrhoids (PPH)] in the management of haemorrhoidal disease, in terms of short-term outcomes and efficacy. Patients presenting with symptomatic haemorrhoids were treated with THD. Patient demographics, pre-operative data, post-operative pain scores, complications, recurrence, and patient satisfaction scores were evaluated and recorded. Patients with acute thrombosed haemorrhoids, external haemorrhoids only, or other concomitant anal diseases were excluded. These data were compared with the historical data of PPH. Forty consecutive patients underwent THD from February 2012 to July 2013 and were compared to 37 patients who underwent PPH taken from a medical records database. There were no significant differences in terms of demographic data, type of anaesthesia, operative time, and blood loss. Length of hospital stay, time to first post-operative bowel movement, and complications were similar between the two groups. The median pain score after THD and PPH was 1.71 and 5.00, respectively, on a scale of 0-10 (10 = worst possible pain) (p = 0.000). There was a significant improvement in bleeding and prolapse scores after THD. THD patients had an earlier return to normal daily activities (3.13 vs. 6.78 days, p = 0.001) when compared with the PPH group. Upon follow-up, patients in both groups had similar satisfaction scores, and complication and recurrence rates. Both THD and PPH appear to be safe procedures for haemorrhoidal disease, and they appear to have similar short-term outcomes. In particular, THD seems to be associated with a lower pain score than PPH, an earlier return to normal daily activities, and similar rates of complication and recurrence.

Comparison of Doppler Guided Hemorrhoid Artery Ligation and Milligan Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy in Management of Hemorrhoidal Disease

Background: Hemorrhoidal disease is the most common rectal disorder, and many modalities have been suggested for its treatment. Objectives: In this study, we compared Doppler-guided Hemorrhoid Artery Ligation, one of the newest techniques in the treatment of this disease, to the Milligan-Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy (open Hemorrhoidectomy). Patients and Methods: One hundred patients were enrolled in this study and divided randomly into two groups of fifty patients. Each group either underwent the Milligan-Morgan procedure or the Doppler-guided Hemorrhoid Artery Ligation method. The outcomes were compared using statistical methods. Results: Patient demographic results and symptomatology and the type of anesthesia used had no influence on the study results. The mean duration of the operation had no statistical difference. The major impact of this new method had less postoperative pain and more patient satisfaction. After a mean follow up of eighteen months, we had two cases of recurrence in the Doppler-guided Hemorrhoid Artery Ligation group with grade IV hemorrhoidal disease. Conclusions: Doppler-guided Hemorrhoid Artery Ligation is a safe and easy method for treating hemorrhoidal disease, but its results should be interpreted carefully, especially in grade IV of the disease.

A systematic review comparing transanal haemorrhoidal de-arterialisation to stapled haemorrhoidopexy in the management of haemorrhoidal disease

The aim of this study was to systematically analyse the clinical trials on the effectiveness of transanal haemorrhoidal de-arterialisation (THD) and stapled haemorrhoidopexy (SH) in the management of haemorrhoidal disease (HD). Clinical trials on the effectiveness of THD and SH in the management of HD were analysed systematically using RevMan(®), and combined outcomes were expressed as risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD). Three randomised, controlled trials encompassing 150 patients were analysed systematically. There were 80 THD patients and 70 SH patients. There was no significant heterogeneity (P = 0.40) among included trials. Therefore, in the fixed effects model, THD and SH were statistically equivalent in terms of treatment success rate (P = 0.19), operation time (P = 0.55), postoperative complications (P = 0.11) and recurrence (P = 0.46) of HD. THD was associated with significantly less postoperative pain (MD, -2.00; 95% CI, -2.06, -1.94; z = 63.59; P < 0.00001) compared to SH. Both THD and SH are equally effective and can be attempted for the management of HD. However, THD is associated with significantly lesser postoperative pain and therefore may be considered a preferred procedure. This conclusion is based only on treating 150 patients by THD or SH in three moderate-quality randomised trials. A major, multicenter, randomised trial is required to validate this conclusion and investigate other variables like hospital stay, cost-effectiveness and health-related quality of life measurement.