Management Of Ductal Carcinoma Research Articles

Update on the management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: current approach and future perspectives.

The standard treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ became well established through the results of several valuable clinical trials, and its therapeutic benefits have now come to be taken for granted. Ductal carcinoma in situ has an extremely good prognosis with the current treatment approach, with a 10-year breast cancer-specific survival rate of 97-98%. According to one retrospective cohort study, the breast cancer-specific survival rate of patients with low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ does not differ significantly between patients undergoing and not undergoing surgery. Some patients with ductal carcinoma in situ are not at a risk of progression to invasive cancer, but the predictors of such progression have not yet been clearly identified. Therefore, the same therapeutic strategies have been used to treat ductal carcinoma in situ and under the assumption that they have risks of invasive breast cancer, and a well-balanced risk/benefit ratio in respect of treatment has not yet been achieved. Based on the results of several recent clinical trials aimed at ensuring provision of a well-balanced treatment for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ which carries a good prognosis, de-escalation of postoperative adjuvant therapy has now begun. Currently, not only is the optimization of postoperative adjuvant therapy accelerating, but also clinical trials to de-escalate basic surgical treatments are under way. There is a possibility of achieving individualized treatment for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast with reduced treatment intervention. In this review, we present an overview of the current treatment approaches and potential future management strategies for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

The Evolving Role of Cryosurgery in Breast Cancer Management: A Comprehensive Review.

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed type of cancer, accounting for approximately one in eight cancer diagnoses worldwide. In 2020, there were approximately 2.3 million new cases of breast cancer globally, resulting in around 685,000 deaths. Consequently, there is an ongoing need to develop innovative therapeutic approaches that can improve both clinical outcomes and patient quality of life. The use of ultra-low cryogenic temperatures, facilitated by cryogenic media such as liquid nitrogen, has revolutionized the biomedical field and opened up new possibilities for advanced clinical treatments, including cryosurgery. Cryosurgery has demonstrated its feasibility as a minimally invasive technique for destroying breast tumors and eliciting a significant antitumor immune response in the host. This feature sets cryosurgery apart from other ablative techniques. It has been shown to be well tolerated and effective, offering several advantages such as simplicity, the avoidance of general anesthesia, minimal pain, low morbidity, short recovery time, cost-effectiveness, and notably, improved aesthetic outcomes. The reviewed studies indicate that cryosurgery holds promise in the management of early-stage breast cancer and metastatic disease, especially in triple-negative and Her2-positive molecular subtypes in conjunction with checkpoint inhibitors and anti-Her2 antibodies, respectively. Furthermore, the effectiveness of cryosurgery in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ should be investigated as an alternative modality to surgery or surveillance. The minimally invasive nature of cryosurgery has the potential to significantly enhance the quality of life for patients.

The Biology and Management of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast

The Biology and Management of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast

Changing trends in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ in Republic of Korea: a comprehensive analysis using Health Insurance Review and Assessment data [2009-2020

Increasing rates of diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), given the widespread use of mammography, is a global trend. Various attempts have been made in the selection of surgical methods and application of radiation therapy (RT), and the prevalence of infectious diseases has also affected these attempts. This study aimed to investigate evolving treatment patterns and trends in the management of DCIS in South Korea. We conducted a comprehensive search of the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service-National Patient Sample (HIRA-NPS) database and selected patients who underwent breast surgery following a DCIS diagnosis between 2009 and 2020. Based on this sample, the analyses were weighted according to the Korean population. We examined annual variations in mastectomy types, reconstructive procedures, and RT utilization from a multidisciplinary perspective. In our weighted sample, 43,780 patients with DCIS underwent surgery, with a consistent annual increase of 10%. The proportion of lumpectomy procedures increased from 56.7% to 65.4%, showing a greater growth rate than that of total mastectomies (TMs). Following the availability of reconstruction data in 2015, shifts have emerged toward a preference for implant-based autologous tissue reconstruction. As we transitioned to the latter part of our study, the trend was marked by the increasing adoption of hypofractionated RT and omission of RT. Of the patients who underwent lumpectomy in 2020, 25.6% adopted hypofractionated RT and 53.8% omitted RT. This transformation was particularly evident among older patients, individuals treated in metropolitan areas, and those treated in small-sized healthcare facilities. Our study sheds light on the changing landscape of DCIS treatment in South Korea incorporating perspectives from surgeons, plastic surgeons, and radiation oncologists. We observed an increase in the rates of lumpectomy and implant-based reconstruction. Adoption of hypofractionated RT and omission of RT showed increasing trends.

Breast Cancer, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

The therapeutic options for patients with noninvasive or invasive breast cancer are complex and varied. These NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines for Breast Cancer include recommendations for clinical management of patients with carcinoma in situ, invasive breast cancer, Paget disease, phyllodes tumor, inflammatory breast cancer, and management of breast cancer during pregnancy. The content featured in this issue focuses on the recommendations for overall management of ductal carcinoma in situ and the workup and locoregional management of early stage invasive breast cancer. For the full version of the NCCN Guidelines for Breast Cancer, visit NCCN.org.

Is conservative management of ductal carcinoma in situ risky?

Nonsurgical management of ductal carcinoma in situ is controversial and little is known about the long-term consequences of this approach. In this study, we aimed to determine the risk of (a) upstaging to invasive carcinoma at excision and (b) ipsilateral breast cancer events in patients who might have been eligible for nonsurgical management of DCIS trials. Data from women aged 20 years or older with a biopsy diagnosis of DCIS between January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2014 were collated. The women underwent biopsy and surgical resection (lumpectomy or mastectomy) and were treated with radiation or endocrine therapy as per treating physicians’ choice. The development of ipsilateral breast cancer events (IBEs) was analyzed in patients with at least 5 years of follow-up after standard of care therapy for DCIS. Subset-analysis was undertaken to identify the incidence of IBEs in patients eligible for nonsurgical management trials. The study population consisted of 378 patients with matched cases of biopsy and surgical excision. The overall upstaging rate to IBC was 14.3 and 12.9% for COMET, 8.8% for LORIS, and 10.7% for LORD trial “eligible” patients. At 5 years of follow-up, ~11.5% of overall and trial eligible patients developed IBEs of which approximately half were invasive IBEs. In conclusion, women with DCIS who would have been eligible for nonsurgical management trials have a significantly high risk of developing ipsilateral breast events within 5 years of diagnosis. Better selection criteria are needed to identify DCIS patients who are at very low risk for the development of IBC.

Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: a systematic review for the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC)

ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of preoperative MRI in the management of Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).MethodsWe searched the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases to identify randomised clinical trials (RCTs) or cohort studies assessing the impact of preoperative breast MRI in surgical outcomes, treatment change or loco-regional recurrence. We provided pooled estimates for odds ratios (OR), relative risks (RR) and proportions and assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.ResultsWe included 3 RCTs and 23 observational cohorts, corresponding to 20,415 patients. For initial breast-conserving surgery (BCS), the RCTs showed that MRI may result in little to no difference (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.00) (low certainty); observational studies showed that MRI may have no difference in the odds of re-operation after BCS (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.36 to 2.61) (low certainty); and uncertain evidence from RCTs suggests little to no difference with respect to total mastectomy rate (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.65 to 1.27) (very low certainty). We also found that MRI may change the initial treatment plans in 17% (95% CI 12 to 24%) of cases, but with little to no effect on locoregional recurrence (aHR = 1.18; 95% CI 0.79 to 1.76) (very low certainty).ConclusionWe found evidence of low to very low certainty which may suggest there is no improvement of surgical outcomes with pre-operative MRI assessment of women with DCIS lesions. There is a need for large rigorously conducted RCTs to evaluate the role of preoperative MRI in this population.Key Points• Evidence of low to very low certainty may suggest there is no improvement in surgical outcomes with pre-operative MRI.• There is a need for large rigorously conducted RCTs evaluating the role of preoperative MRI to improve treatment planning for DCIS.

Predictors of surgery preference and quality of life in DCIS after breast MRI: A trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E4112).

6564 Background: Management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains variable, requiring an understanding of patient preferences and concerns to enhance the treatment decision-making process. Pre-operative MRI and surgeon recommendation can further inform surgery choice. Quality of life (QoL) is also an important consideration in treatment decision-making. The aims of this study were to assess patients’ treatment preferences before and after MRI and surgeon consultation, concordance between treatment preference and surgery received, and trends in health-related QoL (HRQL) among a prospective cohort of women newly diagnosed with DCIS. Methods: A prospective nonrandomized clinical trial by the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E4112) enrolled women diagnosed with unilateral DCIS from 75 institutions between March 2015 and April 2016. Participants underwent either wide local excision (WLE) or mastectomy. Surveys queried patient-reported outcomes (PRO) including treatment preference and concerns, and HRQL before and after surgery. Logistic regression models were used to associate surgery preference and actual surgery received with demographic, clinical and PRO data. Change from baseline in HRQL was assessed using linear regression. Results: At study entry, age (OR 0.39, per 5-year increment, 95%CI, 0.21-0.75; p = 0.005) and treatment goals related to the importance of keeping one’s breast (OR 0.51, 95%CI 0.34-0.76; p = 0.001) and removal of the breast for peace of mind (OR 1.46, 95%CI 1.09-1.95; p = 0.01) drove surgery preference for mastectomy vs. WLE. After receipt of MRI and surgeon consultation, surgery preference was primarily mediated by MRI upstaging (OR 11.18, 95%CI 3.19-39.16; p < 0.001). Only 4% of women received a type of surgery that did not match their final treatment preference. The strongest predictors of actual surgery received were MRI upstaging (OR 15.80, 95%CI 4.85-51.46) and surgeon recommendation of mastectomy (OR 4.60, 95%CI 1.52-13.94). Receipt of a single surgery was associated with significantly improved mental health from baseline to one year after definitive surgery (p = 0.02 for mastectomy; p = 0.003 for single WLE). Self-reported Black race was an independent predictor of worsened mental (p = 0.001) and physical (p = 0.04) health at one year after definitive surgery, despite no significant racial differences in baseline HRQL. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the importance of communication between providers and patients regarding treatment preferences and goals, the clinical significance of MRI findings, and the benefits/risks of available treatment options. Future research to identify modifiable factors associated with declining mental and physical health is needed to inform targeted interventions to mitigate racial disparities and enhance HRQL in patients with DCIS.

Management of ductal carcinoma in situ with accelerated partial breast irradiation brachytherapy: Implications for guideline expansion

PurposeAccelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is controversial, and the suitability criteria from the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS), American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO), and the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (GEC-ESTRO) have important differences. Methods and MaterialsThis is a single-institution retrospective review of 169 consecutive patients with DCIS who underwent lumpectomy followed by APBI intracavitary brachytherapy from 2003 to 2018. Outcomes, including overall survival, recurrence-free survival (RFS), ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence, and distant metastasis, were estimated with the Kaplan–Meier method. ResultsThe median followup time was 62.5 months. Median age was 66 years (47–89 years). The majority of patients had estrogen receptor–positive disease (89%). Fifty patients (30%) had Grade 3 disease. Of the 142 patients with adequate pathology interpretation, 91 and 108 cases had margins ≥ 3 mm and ≥2 mm, respectively. Most patients (72%) were prescribed and started endocrine therapy. Of the patients evaluable for ABS criteria (N = 130), 97 met the suitability criteria. Of the patients evaluable for ASTRO criteria (N = 129), 42 were deemed cautionary and 33 were deemed unsuitable. Of the patients evaluable for GEC-ESTRO criteria (N = 143), 141 cases were at intermediate risk and two were at high risk. Five-year ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence, RFS, and overall survival were 0.6%, 97.7%, and 97.2%, respectively. The ABS, ASTRO, and GEC-ESTRO criteria failed to significantly predict for RFS. ConclusionsThese results, although limited by short-term followup, indicate that expansion of the eligibility criteria of APBI for patients with DCIS should be considered.

In situ breast cancer\xa0incidence patterns in Iceland and differences in ductal carcinoma in situ treatment compared to Sweden

The purpose was to review the incidence of in situ carcinoma in Iceland after initiating population-based mammography screening in 1987 and to compare management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) between Iceland and the Uppsala–Örebro region (UÖR) in Central Sweden. The Icelandic Cancer Registry provided data on in situ breast carcinomas for women between 1957 and 2017. Clinical data for women with DCIS between 2008 and 2014 was extracted from hospital records and compared to women diagnosed in UÖR. In Iceland, in situ carcinoma incidence increased from 7 to 30 per 100 000 women per year, following the introduction of organised mammography screening. The proportion of in situ carcinoma of all breast carcinomas increased from 4 to 12%. More than one third (35%) of women diagnosed with DCIS in Iceland were older than 70 years versus 18% in UÖR. In Iceland, 49% of all DCIS women underwent mastectomy compared to 40% in UÖR. The incidence of in situ carcinoma in Iceland increased four-fold after the uptake of population-based mammography screening causing considerable risk of overtreatment. Differences in treatment of DCIS were seen between Iceland and UÖR, revealing the importance of quality registration for monitoring patterns of management.

Views of healthcare professionals about the role of active monitoring in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): Qualitative interview study

BackgroundDuctal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is an in-situ (pre-cancerous) breast malignancy whereby malignant cells are contained within the basement membrane of the breast ducts. Increasing awareness that some low-risk forms of DCIS might remain indolent for many years has led to concern about overtreatment, with at least 3 clinical trials underway internationally assessing the safety of active monitoring for low-risk DCIS. This study aimed to understand healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) views on the management options for patients with DCIS. MethodsQualitative study using semi-structured interviews with HCPs involved in the diagnosis and management of DCIS in Australia and New Zealand. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically using Framework Analysis method. ResultsTwenty-six HCPs including 10 breast surgeons, 3 breast physicians, 6 radiation oncologists, and 7 breast care nurses participated. There was a strong overall consensus that DCIS requires active treatment. HCPs generally felt uncomfortable recommending active monitoring as a management option for low-risk DCIS as they viewed this as outside current standard care. Overall, HCPs felt that active monitoring was an unproven strategy in need of an evidence base; however, many acknowledged that active monitoring for low-risk DCIS could be appropriate for patients with significant co-morbidities or limited life expectancy. They believed that most patients would opt for surgery wherever possible. ConclusionsThis study highlights the important need for robust randomised controlled trial data about active monitoring for women with low-risk DCIS, to provide HCPs with confidence in their management recommendations and decision-making.

Prognostic value of histopathological DCIS features in a large-scale international interrater reliability study

PurposeFor optimal management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), reproducible histopathological assessment is essential to distinguish low-risk from high-risk DCIS. Therefore, we analyzed interrater reliability of histopathological DCIS features and assessed their associations with subsequent ipsilateral invasive breast cancer (iIBC) risk.MethodsUsing a case-cohort design, reliability was assessed in a population-based, nationwide cohort of 2767 women with screen-detected DCIS diagnosed between 1993 and 2004, treated by breast-conserving surgery with/without radiotherapy (BCS ± RT) using Krippendorff’s alpha (KA) and Gwet’s AC2 (GAC2). Thirty-eight raters scored histopathological DCIS features including grade (2-tiered and 3-tiered), growth pattern, mitotic activity, periductal fibrosis, and lymphocytic infiltrate in 342 women. Using majority opinion-based scores for each feature, their association with subsequent iIBC risk was assessed using Cox regression.ResultsInterrater reliability of grade using various classifications was fair to moderate, and only substantial for grade 1 versus 2 + 3 when using GAC2 (0.78). Reliability for growth pattern (KA 0.44, GAC2 0.78), calcifications (KA 0.49, GAC2 0.70) and necrosis (KA 0.47, GAC2 0.70) was moderate using KA and substantial using GAC2; for (type of) periductal fibrosis and lymphocytic infiltrate fair to moderate estimates were found and for mitotic activity reliability was substantial using GAC2 (0.70). Only in patients treated with BCS-RT, high mitotic activity was associated with a higher iIBC risk in univariable analysis (Hazard Ratio (HR) 2.53, 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI) 1.05–6.11); grade 3 versus 1 + 2 (HR 2.64, 95% CI 1.35–5.14) and a cribriform/solid versus flat epithelial atypia/clinging/(micro)papillary growth pattern (HR 3.70, 95% CI 1.34–10.23) were independently associated with a higher iIBC risk.ConclusionsUsing majority opinion-based scores, DCIS grade, growth pattern, and mitotic activity are associated with iIBC risk in patients treated with BCS-RT, but interrater variability is substantial. Semi-quantitative grading, incorporating and separately evaluating nuclear pleomorphism, growth pattern, and mitotic activity, may improve the reliability and prognostic value of these features.

Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) of the Breast: Present Approaches and Future Directions.

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS; intraductal carcinoma) of the breast is commonly found in an asymptomatic woman on routine screening mammography. The purpose of this review is to describe current approaches to the management of DCIS as well as areas for future investigation. Randomized trials have demonstrated that adding radiation treatment after breast conservation surgery (lumpectomy; surgical excision) reduces the rate of ipsilateral local recurrence by about half, and that adding hormonal therapy reduces the rate of all breast cancer events (ipsilateral plus contralateral). Early clinical studies attempted to stratify the risk of recurrence using conventional clinical and pathologic features. More recent clinical studies have attempted to define prospectively patients with lower risk DCIS for whom omission of radiation treatment after lumpectomy is a reasonable option. Molecular profiling is a newer approach to define risk stratification for DCIS. Combining molecular profiling with clinical and pathologic features appears to be more accurate in defining and stratifying the risk of recurrence after lumpectomy. After lumpectomy for DCIS, risk stratification using clinical and pathologic characteristics, and more recently molecular profiling, can help guide clinical decision-making for the use of radiation treatment and hormonal therapy. Ongoing studies are evaluating the possibility of de-escalating therapy, and in some studies, even using core biopsy alone, without surgical excision.

Endocrine Therapy for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) of the Breast with Breast Conserving Surgery (BCS) and Radiotherapy (RT): a Meta-Analysis.

The management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with endocrine therapy remains controversial. A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the role of endocrine therapy for DCIS with breast conserving surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy (RT). A total of 7 articles with randomized controlled trials were included. Five articles compared the effects of BCS and RT followed by tamoxifen (TAM) or not (BCS + RT + TAM vs BCS + RT) and 2 compared the effects of TAM and anastrozole (ANA). TAM obviously reduced the rates of recurrence of ipsilateral breast cancer (IBCR), recurrence of contralateral breast cancer (CBCR), recurrence of ipsilateral invasive breast cancer (IBCR-INV) and recurrence of contralateral DCIS (CBCR-DCIS), and increased the rate of event-free survival (EFS). While ANA reduced the rates of CBCR and recurrence of contralateral invasive breast cancer (CBCR-INV). Patients with ANA had higher incidence of arthralgia, osteoporosis, hypercholesteremia, headache and vaginal dryness, but lower incidence of deep-vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, vasomotor or gynaecological, hot flushes, vaginal haemorrhage, vaginal discharge and vaginal candidiasis than TAM. In conclusion, DCIS patients with positive hormone receptors should be recommended to receive endocrine therapy. Selection of TAM or ANA is based on clinical characteristics and underlying disease of patients, as well as the side-effects of drugs.

Risk of ischemic heart disease after radiotherapy for ductal carcinoma in situ

PurposeThe use of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is increasing. Left-sided breast irradiation may involve exposure of the heart to ionising radiation, increasing the risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD). We examined the incidence of IHD in a population-based cohort of women with DCIS.MethodsThe Breast Cancer DataBase Sweden (BCBase) cohort includes women registered with invasive and in situ breast cancers 1992–2012 and age-matched women without a history of breast cancer. In this analysis, 6270 women with DCIS and a comparison cohort of 31,257 women were included. Through linkage with population-based registers, data on comorbidity, socioeconomic status and incidence of IHD was obtained. Hazard ratios (HR) for IHD with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were analysed.ResultsMedian follow-up time was 8.8 years. The risk of IHD was not increased for women with DCIS versus women in the comparison cohort (HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.82–1.06), after treatment with radiotherapy versus surgery alone (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.60–0.98) or when analysing RT by laterality (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.53–1.37 for left-sided versus right-sided RT).ConclusionsThe risk of IHD was lower for women with DCIS allocated to RT compared to non-irradiated women and to the comparison cohort, probably due to patient selection. Comparison of RT by laterality did not show any over-risk for irradiation of the left breast.

Management of ductal carcinoma in situ in the modern era.

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has been the subject of much controversy since the advent of population based breast screening programs. An increasing number of asymptomatic women are being diagnosed with this condition and there is uncertainty over the best treatment algorithm for this condition if treatment is to be considered at all. Different subtypes of DCIS show innate differences in developmental pathways and biological behavior. This is not only determined by pathological subtypes but there is increasing understanding of molecular biomarkers related to DCIS progression. The ultimate management aim is to identify a subgroup of patients in whom DCIS will not progress to invasive disease such that they can avoid morbidity from surgical and adjuvant therapies. This has to be balanced by the potential risk of undertreatment of patients in whom DCIS is likely to progress to invasive cancer and hence a reduced life expectancy. Results of current ongoing prospective randomized trials assessing the safety of omitting surgery for what is considered to be low risk DCIS are eagerly awaited for by patients and clinicians. However the definition of what is considered to be "low risk" DCIS is still to be ascertained.

Abstract P3-08-05: Validation of a nomogram for predicting recurrence among women with ductal carcinoma in situ and breast conserving surgery in an integrated health care system

Abstract Current management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) most often entails removing the lesion by breast-conserving surgery. Quantifying the risk of a patient's ipsilateral breast event (IBE) recurrence, either invasive cancer or DCIS, after breast conserving surgery remains a clinical concern. The aim of this study was to validate the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) nomogram to predict IBE recurrence in patients from our institution. Patients and Methods We retrospectively identified 608 patients in the Kaiser Permanente Northwest integrated healthcare system with a diagnosis of DCIS who had undergone local excision from 1990 through 2007. We assessed the performance of the MSKCC nomogram for predicting IBE recurrence using measures of discrimination (how well risk scores separate those with and without the event) and calibration (agreement between predicted and observed risk). We calculated Harrell's C and R2D to provide estimates of discrimination. We calculated the calibration slope by performing a Cox regression using the prognostic index (PI; predicted log relative hazard based on the original Cox coefficients), with a slope not significantly different from 1 indicating no difference in discrimination from the development sample. We also examined discrimination by comparing the KM curves of 4 risk groups and in a Cox regression as a predictor, which were created using Cox's method (4 groups using the 16th, 50th, & 84th percentiles), as no risk groups were defined in the MSKCC development study. We examined whether there was model misfit by testing each predictor in a Cox regression with an offset of the PI. Finally, we assessed calibration by plotting the observed rates and associated 95% CIs against the predicted probabilities for groups based on 4 risk groups and octiles. Results The median follow-up time for the KPNW cohort was 125 months. The 10-year IBE recurrence rate was 9.5%, 95% CI [7.0%, 13.0%). Harrell's C was .70, which is comparable to what has been found in other validation studies. The PI accounted for 22% of variation in time (R2D =.22, 95% CI [.08, .38]). The test of the calibration slope provided no support that discrimination in this sample differs from the development study (LR χ2(1)=0.21, p=.65). An examination of the Kaplan-Meier curves among the risk groups showed good separation of the high risk group compared to the others, but little separation between the lowest two risk groups. None of the predictors demonstrated evidence for differential weighting from the MSKCC coefficients (p values ranged from .08 to .97). Calibration was good for the lowest, low, and moderate risk groups, but there was underprediction in the high risk group. When examining calibration using octiles, we found a similar pattern to that of other validation studies in which the highest octile had the furthest departure from perfect agreement. Conclusion The MSKCC nomogram for predicting IBE recurrence in patients with DCIS who were treated with local excision have some utility, and our results are consistent with other validation efforts. However, there is much potential to further increase the prediction of recurrence beyond what is possible with the MSKCC nomogram. Citation Format: Leo MC, Francisco M, Jenkins C, Weinmann S. Validation of a nomogram for predicting recurrence among women with ductal carcinoma in situ and breast conserving surgery in an integrated health care system [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-08-05.

Abstract P4-15-12: Evaluating the significance of the Van Nuys prognostic index for the management of ductal carcinoma in situ – one center's experience

Abstract Aim: This was to assess the treatment outcomes of ductal carcinoma of the breast (DCIS) based on the Van Nuys Prognostic Index. Material and Methods: 634 consecutive patients with DCIS were treated at the Warsaw Cancer Center, Poland between 1996 and 2008 based on the VNPI score. Tumorectomy without radiotherapy (T) was performed in 123 (20%) patients, breast conserving treatment (BCT) in 206 (32%) and mastectomy (M) in 305 (48%). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analysed within 3 groups and a multivariate analysis was performed to determine the most important factor affecting local relapse. Results: 5-year, 10-year and 15-year DFS in the M group were respectively 98%, 97% and 97% whilst 5-year, 10-year and 15-year DFS in the BCT group were respectively 91%, 87% and 80%. 5-year, 10-year and 15-year DFS in the T group were respectively 92%, 73% and 67%. Local recurrence was observed in 54 patients. In 40% cases this was noninvasive and in 60 % invasive. Only 4 of 54 patients with recurrence died due to breast cancer. 5-year, 10-year and 15-year OS in the M group were respectively 96%, 92% and 89%. 5-year, 10-year and 15-year OS in the BCT group were respectively 99%, 94% and 85%. 5-year, 10-year and 15-year OS in the T group were respectively 95%, 90% and 73% (p=0.422). Tumor size assessed by mammography was the only variable affecting DFS. Conclusions: Treatment outcomes of DCIS based on the Van Nuys Prognostic Index are comparable with those cited the literature, however, the recurrence rate in the T group seems to be very high. This group requires that new risk factors be sought for prior to taking a treatment decision. Citation Format: Niwinska A, Galecki J, Nagadowska M, Piechocki J, Kunkiel M, Jagiello-Gruszfeld AI, Nowecki Z. Evaluating the significance of the Van Nuys prognostic index for the management of ductal carcinoma in situ – one center's experience [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-15-12.

Article Commentary: Controversies Regarding the Diagnosis and Management of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a premalignant condition, whose incidence is increasing in the current era of widespread screening mammography. While eminently treatable, there are innumerable controversies that surround this disease in terms of its diagnosis and treatment. We discuss these issues and review the data to date regarding this condition which affects roughly 20 per cent of all patients presenting with breast cancer.

Local therapies for breast cancer.

SummaryDuring the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium in December 2016, the main topics were systemic treatment of breast cancer and molecular research. But several studies were also presented concerning local therapy: Surgical issues on evaluating resection margins, management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), surgical challenges after neoadjuvant therapy related to assessment of response or treatment of axillary lymph nodes, and studies about outcome after breast reconstruction and radiation therapy were discussed. In this short review, oral presentations of these topics are summarized.