Management Of Complex Renal Calculi Research Articles

Comparison of conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in complex renal calculus – Our institutional experience

Background: Complex renal calculi, characterized by their size, location, and composition, pose a significant challenge to urologists due to the potential for complications and the difficulty in achieving complete stone clearance. Conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) are two established techniques for managing these complex renal calculi. Aims and Objectives: The aims and objectives are to compare the effectiveness, safety, and outcomes of PCNL versus ECIRS in managing complex renal calculi in a cohort of 60 cases treated at GMKMCH-Salem. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 60 patients with complex renal calculi who underwent either conventional PCNL or ECIRS during a specified period at GMKMCH-Salem. Patient demographics, stone characteristics, procedural details, intraoperative and post-operative parameters, and complications were analyzed and compared between the two treatment groups. Results: The study found that both PCNL and ECIRS techniques were effective in treating complex renal calculi. However, significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of outcomes. The ECIRS technique exhibited superior outcomes with higher stone clearance rates (P<0.001), shorter operative times (P<0.05), and reduced hospital stays (P<0.05) compared to conventional PCNL. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that ECIRS is a promising alternative to conventional PCNL in the management of complex renal calculi. The ECIRS technique yielded higher stone clearance rates, shorter operative times, and reduced hospital stays, potentially improving patient outcomes and reducing health-care costs. Although our findings show favorable results for ECIRS, the decision between conventional PCNL and ECIRS should be based on individual patient characteristics, surgeon expertise, and resource availability.

A Case Study on Management of Complex Renal Calculi (Mutrashmari) by Ayurvedic Formulation

A Case Study on Management of Complex Renal Calculi (Mutrashmari) by Ayurvedic Formulation

Is multiple tracts percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) safe modality in management of complex renal stones? A prospective study: Single center experience

ObjectivesTo evaluate and analyze the efficacy and the safety of multiple tracts PCNL in management of complex renal calculi. Patients and MethodsThe study was conducted during the period between March 2016 till January 2017 on 265 patients with complex renal stones, all patients underwent multiple tracts PCNL, either with double or triple punctures, preoperative and postoperative laboratory and radiological results were compared together in correlation to the stone size, shape and site. ResultsThe results of our study have shown that increased size and complexity of stones is associated with increased number of punctures needed to achieve stone clearance, and the aggressive approach to complex renal calculi using multiple tracts PCNL is a safe and effective modality in management of complex renal calculi with acceptable complications. ConclusionNumber of percutaneous tracts needed for stone clearance was increased with the increase in stone size and complexity. Surgeon experience, accurate choosing puncture site and carefully performed multiple tracts will decrease the intra-operative and postoperative complications or transfusion requirements.

Comparative evaluation of upper versus lower calyceal approach in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for managing complex renal calculi.

Introduction:Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the treatment of choice for staghorn and large renal stones. The success of PCNL is highly related to optimal renal access. Upper calyceal puncture being more difficult and more demanding have relatively few studies presented.Aims and Objectives:This prospective study was carried out to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of upper calyceal versus lower calyceal puncture for the removal of complex renal stones through PCNL.Materials and Methods:A total of 94 patients underwent PCNL for complex renal stone in our institute. Fifty-one of them underwent lower calyceal, while 43 underwent upper calyceal puncture. The two approaches are compared as per total duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, infundibular/pelvic tear, rate of complete clearance and rate of postoperative complications (pulmonary, bleeding, fever and sepsis, etc.).Observation and Results:In our study, the success rate was 76.47% for those in the lower, 90.70% for those in the upper calyceal access group. Thoracic complications (hydrothorax) occurred to 1 patient in upper calyceal supracostal access group. Bleeding requiring blood transfusion happened to 5 patients in lower calyceal access and 1 in upper calyceal group.Conclusion:In our study for the management of complex renal calculi, we conclude that in a previously unoperated kidney, upper calyceal puncture through subcostal or supra 12th rib is a feasible option minimizing lung/pleural rupture and gives a better clearance rate. We suggest that with due precautions, there should not be any hesitation for upper calyceal puncture in indicated patients.

Ultrasound-guided Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Flank Position for Management of Complex Renal Calculi

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of performing ultrasound-guided minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) in the flank position for the management of complex renal calculi. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is usually performed with the patient in the prone position under fluoroscopic guidance; however, this position, and guidance method have some limitations. From January 2007 to December 2009, 93 patients (101 kidneys) with complex renal calculi underwent ultrasound-guided MPCNL in the flank position. The mean age of the patients was 45.3 years (range 29-71). The calculi-free rate in the patients who underwent a single procedure was 78.2% (79 of 101 kidneys). The average operative duration was 82.6 minutes (range 45-190). Although the perioperative blood loss was not significantly different between single-tract and double-tract MPCNL (P = .087, F = 2.981), the calculi-free rate was significantly greater in the patients who underwent double-tract MPCNL than in those who underwent single-tract MPCNL (P = .027, chi-square = 4.873). Perioperative blood transfusions were not required in any patient. Similarly, ureteral calculi due to percutaneous nephrolithotomy were not observed. Secondary renal hemorrhage occurred in 3 patients who had undergone single-tract MPCNL and 1 underwent nephrectomy. The results of our study have shown that ultrasound-guided MPCNL with the patient in the flank position is safe and effective for treating complex renal calculi, without the side effects of radiation to the patient and surgeon. Double-tract MPCNL is suitable for complex renal calculi and, in some cases, is required to increase the calculi-free rate. The insertion of twin ureteral catheters before lithotripsy might be helpful in avoiding residual ureteral calculi after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Simultaneous Combined Use of Flexible Ureteroscopy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy to Reduce the Number of Access Tracts in the Management of Complex Renal Calculi

Simultaneous Combined Use of Flexible Ureteroscopy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy to Reduce the Number of Access Tracts in the Management of Complex Renal Calculi

Simultaneous combined use of flexible ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy to reduce the number of access tracts in the management of complex renal calculi

To present early experience in managing complex renal calculi using a combined ureteroscopic and percutaneous approach, as complex and branched renal calculi often require multiple access tracts during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL), and the combined use of flexible ureteroscopy and PNL has the potential to reduce the inherent morbidity of several tracts. The study included seven patients (mean age 54 years) with multiple, branched, large-volume renal calculi suitable for management with PNL. Preoperative data, including patient demographics, stone location and stone surface area, were recorded. After informed consent, the patients underwent combined PNL and ureteroscopy in one session. Intraoperative data, including the location of PNL puncture sites, operative duration and complications, were analysed. Stone-free rates were determined by follow-up imaging at 3 months. All patients had either two or more stones in separate locations in the collecting system, or staghorn stones involving multiple calyces. The mean stone burden was 666 mm(2). All patients had only one percutaneous access tract. The mean operative duration was 142 min and the mean blood loss 79 mL. Two patients had small residual stones (< 3 mm), that required ureteroscopic intervention as they failed to pass spontaneously by 3 months after the initial combined procedure. The convalescence was similar to that in our current PNL practice; imaging showed that five of the patients were stone-free. Combined PNL and ureteroscopic management can effectively reduce the number of percutaneous access tracts which would otherwise be required for managing complex and branched renal calculi, as stones in an unfavourable location relative to the access tract can be relocated and fragmented within easy reach of the single nephrostomy tract. This manoeuvre reduces potential patient morbidity and blood loss but with no significant effect on stone-free rates and operative durations.