Management Of Asthma In Adults Research Articles

The Saudi initiative for asthma - 2024 update: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma in adults and children.

The Saudi Initiative for Asthma 2024 (SINA-2024) is the sixth version of asthma guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma for adults and children that was developed by the SINA group, a subsidiary of the Saudi Thoracic Society. The main objective of the SINA is to have guidelines that are up-to-date, simple to understand, and easy to use by healthcare workers dealing with asthma patients. To facilitate achieving the goals of asthma management, the SINA Panel approach is mainly based on the assessment of symptom control and risk for both adults and children. The approach to asthma management is aligned for age groups: adults, adolescents, children aged 5-12 years, and children aged <5 years. SINA guidelines have focused more on personalized approaches reflecting a better understanding of disease heterogeneity with the integration of recommendations related to biologic agents, evidence-based updates on treatment, and the role of immunotherapy in management. The medication appendix has also been updated with the addition of recent evidence, new indications for existing medication, and new medications. The guidelines are constructed based on the available evidence, local literature, and the current situation at national and regional levels. There is also an emphasis on patient-doctor partnership in the management that also includes a self-management plan.

Real-World Effectiveness of Statin Therapy in Adult Asthma

Blood lipids affect airway inflammation in asthma. Although several studies have suggested anti-inflammatory effects of statins on asthmatic airways, further studies are needed to clarify the long-term effectiveness of statins on asthma control and whether they are an effective treatment option. To evaluate the long-term effectiveness of statins in the chronic management of adult asthma in real-world practice. Electronic medical record data spanning 28 years, collected from the Ajou University Medical Center in Korea, were used to conduct a retrospective study. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients with asthma who had maintained statin use (the statin group) and those not taking statins, whose blood lipid tests were always normal (the non-statin group). We performed propensity score matching and calculated hazard ratios with 95% CIs using the Cox proportional hazards model. Severe asthma exacerbation was the primary outcome; asthma exacerbation, asthma-related hospitalization, and new-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension were secondary outcomes. After 1:1 propensity score matching, the statin and non-statin groups each included 545 adult patients with asthma. The risk of severe asthma exacerbations and asthma exacerbations was significantly lower in the statin group than in the non-statin group (hazard ratios [95% CI]= 0.57 [0.35-0.90] and 0.71 [0.52-0.96], respectively). There were no significant differences in the risk of asthma-related hospitalization or new-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus or hypertension between groups (0.76 [0.53-1.09], 2.33 [0.94-6.59], and 1.71 [0.95-3.17], respectively). Statin use is associated with a lower risk of asthma exacerbation, with better clinical outcomes in adult asthma.

Proposed Strategies to Improve Adult Asthma Management in Egypt: Expert Review and Recommendations.

Several challenges face asthma management in Egypt, including the high percentage of uncontrolled patients, inadequate compliance, and overuse of short-acting beta-agonists (SABAs) leading to increased asthma-related morbidity and mortality. In this regard, the recent Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) recommendations included inhaled corticosteroids containing therapy for mild asthma. Local healthcare systems and healthcare professionals (HCPs) often experience practical challenges when implementing global guidelines. The present expert review aims to outline the development of local guidelines and health policies that integrate global advances in asthma management while addressing unmet needs and challenges in Egypt. A steering committee of health policymakers and respiratory experts from the principal healthcare sectors in Egypt came together in March 2021 to develop a consent and national guideline for local asthma management, codifying the current challenges and the required elements for adequate control. The recommendations were either evidence-based or consensus-based from the clinical expertise and perspectives of the committee. The committee identified vital challenges facing all chronic airway diseases with initial focus on asthma management in Egypt in diagnosis, data collection, policymaking, patients' awareness, and physicians' attitudes. In general, the committee stated that globally adapted management protocols necessitate addressing from diverse perspectives through policymakers, HCPs, and patients. Accordingly, it is vital to provide relevant education for the patient and HCPs. The recommendations emphasize key elements concerning baseline assessment, diagnosis, treatment strategy with regular review of patient progress, and compliance toward the introduced reforms. Full integration of these recommendations into local practice allows physicians to sustain adequate management while reducing preventable exacerbations and unnecessary burdens. The proposed strategies outline efficient patient-centered management that approaches asthma as an inflammatory condition, encouraging health promotion and patients' compliance.

Asthma Management in Adults

Management of asthma in adults has advanced in the past 10 years. Central to these advances has been further clarification of type (T) 2 mechanisms of airway inflammation and utilization of T2 biomarkers, that is, eosinophils and fractional exhaled nitric oxide. In addition, epithelial cells are emerging as significant contributors to inflammation through generation of alarmins to initiate local injury as well as downstream pathways. Five new biologics, mepolizumab, benralizumab, reslizumab, dupilumab, and tezepelumab, were approved to join omalizumab and revolutionize severe asthma treatment. These biologics significantly prevent exacerbations to spare systemic corticosteroids use and their side effects. Guidelines attest to the effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β-agonists (formoterol) for both maintenance and rescue therapy. Focused updates to the Expert Panel Report addressed limited but specific questions relevant to asthma control. Future guidelines should include phenotype/endotype-directed therapeutics to gain more precision-directed treatment.

Adult Asthma Management in the Emergency Department during COVID-19 Pandemic: An Expert Opinion Survey

Adult patients with asthma often access the emergency department (ED) for the management of exacerbations or uncontrolled symptoms. Sometimes the first diagnosis of asthma occurs right in the ED. In the last couple of years, the COVID-19 pandemic spread around the world, causing an acute respiratory syndrome named SARS-CoV-2, characterized mainly by respiratory symptoms, such as cough and shortness of breath, in addition to fever. This clinical pattern partially overlaps with that caused by asthma, thus generating confusion in terms of diagnosis and management. It is also unclear whether asthma may be associated with a worse prognosis in COVID-19 infection. This expert opinion paper provides specific recommendations to ease the challenges related to adult patients with asthma admitted to the ED during the COVID-19 pandemic, with particular reference to diagnosis and treatment. Moreover, it provides well-defined indications to guide decisions on discharge, hospital admission, as well as follow-up. A panel of experts composed of emergency medicine physicians, pulmonologists and allergologists discussed, voted and approved all the recommendations.

Expert Opinion for the Management of Severe Asthma in Adults in the Gulf Region

Abstract: Asthma is a noncommunicable, chronic respiratory disease affecting 339 million individ-uals globally. The SNAPSHOT study suggests a prevalence rate of 6.4% in the Middle East region and 7.6% in the Gulf region alone, causing a significant healthcare burden. The management of se-vere asthma poses a significant challenge, thus accounting for suboptimal disease control. Diagnosis of severe asthma is quite difficult, considering the multiple factors playing a pivotal role in disease progression and management. Primary care physicians (PCPs) are predominantly involved in deci-sion-making in asthma diagnosis and control. Therefore, educating the PCPs regarding diagnostic strategies and guiding them for a timely referral to specialists can reduce fatal episodes and disease exacerbations. In this way, PCPs may ensure effective treatment and achieve optimal disease con-trol. To develop an algorithm and decision tree that may aid PCPs in the timely referral of severe asthma patients to specialists, an expert committee meeting was convened in December 2020 with leading experts from the United Arab Emirates. A three-step algorithm “CAR” was established to guide PCPs: “confirm” and check diagnosis, “assess” factors contributing to exacerbations and poor quality of life, and “refer” to a specialist. The “Severe Asthma Referral approach” conceptualized herein for the PCPs may help overcome the pragmatic challenges of early diagnosis, establish sim-ple referral criteria for specialists, and attain severe asthma treatment goals.

New perspectives of biological therapy for severe asthma in adults and adolescents.

Severe asthma is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, healthcare costs and impaired quality of life. Asthma is no longer considered as a single entity but as a heterogeneous disease with different clinical presentations (phenotypes) and variable underlying mechanistic biological pathways (endotypes). Two different endotypes are based on the inflammatory Type 2 T-helper response: T2-high and T2-low. The understanding of these endotypes has revolutionised the management of severe asthma. Recent guidelines from the 2019 European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society (ERS/ATS) and Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2021 specifically address the diagnosis and the management of severe asthma in adults, but less evidence exists for the paediatric population. Presently, five biologics for the treatment of severe asthma are approved, i.e., omalizumab (anti-IgE antibody), mepolizumab and reslizumab (anti-IL-5 antibody), benralizumab (anti-IL-5 receptor antibody) and dupilumab (anti-IL-4 receptor alpha antibody). This article reviews the pathological mechanisms of severe asthma, clinical biomarkers related to the T2-high endotype, and their use for the prediction of the severity of the disease and response to biological therapy. Furthermore, future developments of biologics for severe asthma are presented.

National clinical guidelines: The diagnosis and management of asthma in adults.

Background: Qatar has culturally diverse health professionals; and therefore, the care provided may vary according to their background, resulting in variations in care. To bridge this gap, the Ministry of Public Health (MOPH) has established the National Clinical Guidelines (NCG) Program, which aims to reduce variation in care delivery, improve value-add from the healthcare system, adopt international best practices to local context, and enable insurers and providers to access the most currently reviewed evidence-based practice in diagnosis and management of diseases.The NCG for “Diagnosis and Management of Asthma in Adults” was developed in collaboration between Strategic Planning and Performance Department and Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) who are practicing healthcare professionals representing different healthcare organizations in Qatar.The NCG aims to standardize the management and treatment received by adult patients with asthma across the healthcare system and adapt the best practice recommendations in the management of asthma to the culture, customs, practice, and formulary of Qatar.Methods: This NCG has been developed through a rigorous process that aligns with international best practices and localized to the context of Qatar, involving:• Extensive literature search for reputed published evidence specific to NCGs.• Critical appraisal of the literature.• Development of a baseline draft guideline.• Review of the baseline draft by SMEs and patients.• Review of the guidelines by the National Clinical Guidelines and Pathways Committee (NCGPC) from stakeholder organizations across Qatar.Results: The first edition of the NCG was published on the MOPH website on December 14, 2016; and it was updated and republished on August 22, 2019. A Patient Information Leaflet (PIL) was prepared from the NCG using simple language for use by the patients. The NCG is currently under an updation process based on new evidence since August 22, 2019. A live demo was developed on how to access the NCG and its relevant pathways from the MOPH website and navigate each section of the guidelines.Conclusion: These NCGs will improve the quality of care for patients with asthma and advocate for the best clinical practice strategies on the management of asthma in adults.

Primary Care Management of Asthma Exacerbations or Attacks: Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought a renewed focus on appropriate management of chronic respiratory conditions with a heightened awareness of respiratory symptoms and the requirement for differential diagnosis between an asthma attack and COVID-19 infection. Despite early concerns in the pandemic, most studies suggest that well-managed asthma is not a risk factor for more severe COVID-related outcomes, and that asthma may even have a protective effect. Advice on the treatment of asthma and asthma attacks has remained unchanged. This article describes some challenges faced in primary care asthma management in adults and in teenagers, particularly their relevance during a pandemic, and provides practical advice on asthma attack recognition, classification, treatment and continuity of care. Acute attacks, characterised by increased symptoms and reduced lung function, are often referred to as exacerbations of asthma by doctors and nurses but are usually described by patients as asthma attacks. They carry a significant and underestimated morbidity and mortality burden. Many patients experiencing an asthma attack are assessed in primary care for treatment and continuing management. This may require remote assessment by telephone and home monitoring devices, where available, during a pandemic. Differentiation between an asthma attack and a COVID-19 infection requires a structured clinical assessment, taking account of previous medical and family history. Early separation into mild, moderate, severe or life-threatening attacks is helpful for continuing good management. Most attacks can be managed in primary care but when severe or unresponsive to initial treatment, the patient should be appropriately managed until transfer to an acute care facility can be arranged. Good quality care is important to prevent further attacks and must include a follow-up appointment in primary care, proactive regular dosing with daily controller therapy and an understanding of a patient’s beliefs and perceptions about asthma to maximise future self-management.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-022-02056-x.

CME Exam: Difficult-to-Control Asthma Management in Adults

CME Exam: Difficult-to-Control Asthma Management in Adults

Guidelines for the management of asthma in adults: Evidence and recommendations.

The multidisciplinary experts in Thailand developed an asthma management recommendation that was relevant to low-middle income countries (LMICS). Populations level consideration about asthma management is emphasized. The healthcare systems, access to and availability of treatments as well as the asthma populations vary from country to country in LMICS. The feasibility in clinical practice for implementation is also a major issue. For these reasons, the practice guidelines that are relevant to local contexts are essential to improve better asthma control. Furthermore, integrative and collaboration between asthma experts and the public health sector to implement and discriminate such guidelines will help to achieve these challenging goals. The topics covered include the current asthma situation in Thailand and the Asia-Pacific region, the definition of asthma, asthma diagnosis, assessment of asthma patients, asthma treatment - both pharmacological and non-pharmacological, management of asthma exacerbation, management of asthma comorbidities, treatment of asthma in special conditions, severe and uncontrolled asthma, Thai alternative medicine and asthma, and asthma and coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19).

Guidelines for the management of asthma in adults and adolescents: Position statement of the South African Thoracic Society - 2021 update.

Asthma prevalence is increasing worldwide, and surveys indicate that most patients in developed and developing countries, including South Africa, do not receive optimal care and are therefore not well controlled. Standard management guidelines adapted to in-country realities are important to support optimal care. The South African Thoracic Society (SATS) first published a guideline for the management of chronic persistent asthma in 1992, which has subsequently been revised several times. The main aim of the present document was to revise and update SATS' statement on the suggested management of chronic asthma, based on the need to promote optimal care and control of asthma, together with the incorporation of new concepts and drug developments. This revised document reinforces optimal care and incorporates the following primary objectives to achieve the recent advances in asthma care: continued emphasis on the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as the foundation of asthma treatmentto reduce the reliance on short-acting beta-2 agonist (SABA) monotherapy for asthma symptomsto incorporate the evidence and strategy for the use of the combination of an ICS and formoterol for acute symptom relief (instead of a SABA)to incorporate the evidence and strategy for the use of as-needed ICS-long-acting beta agonists (LABA) for patients with infrequent symptoms or 'mild' asthmato incorporate the evidence and strategy for the use of a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) in combination with ICS-LABA; andto incorporate the evidence and strategy for the use of and management with a biologic therapy in severe asthma.

Difficult-to-Control Asthma Management in Adults

The management of difficult-to-control asthma remains a significant challenge, which frequently requires the input of the wider multidisciplinary team. This review covers the importance of systematic assessment, phenotyping, treatment options at step 4, an overview of biologics and novel therapies for type 2 (T2) inflammation, and nonpharmacological interventions. Once people have been identified as suffering from difficult-to-control asthma, it is important to use the systematic assessment process to allow accurate diagnosis and optimization of adherence as well as identification and treatment of any relevant comorbidities. Before initiating a biologic, it is important to optimize inhaled therapies and sufficiently phenotype individual patients to allow for the logical use of biologic agents targeting T2 inflammation. For patients who either do not have evidence of T2 inflammation or remain symptomatic despite biologics, attention should be paid to the available nonpharmacological interventions. Difficult-to-treat asthma remains an area of significant unmet need, but improvements in models of service delivery and the ongoing pharmacological pipeline are causes for significant optimism that sooner rather than later there will no longer be asthmatic patients who are difficult to treat.

Acute asthma

Asthma is a common chronic condition, characterised by episodic acute exacerbations, which may require emergency treatment. According to Asthma UK, nationally 5 400 000 people are being treated for asthma; with life-threatening asthma attacks occurring every 10 seconds and three lives lost daily. In acute asthma, symptoms, including breathlessness, chest tightness, wheeze and cough, deteriorate progressively. Individuals with asthma symptoms often present to primary care and it is important that GPs can recognise and appropriately manage acute asthma. This article reviews the background, recognition and management of acute asthma in adults and children over the age of five, drawing on current guidelines.

Outpatient management of asthma in adults: A snapshot of the 2020 GINA report.

The Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention publishes an annual report on asthma management and prevention. The report reflects the most recent evidence on asthma and its treatment and provides recommendations for clinical practice. This article reviews the guidelines with a focus on what's new and clinically important for practitioners treating this patient population.

Microbiota - The Unseen Players in Adult Asthmatic Airways.

Modulation of human lung airway physiology by commensal microbiota has become one of the key mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of adult asthma. Recent evidence suggests that the composition of respiratory microbiota plays a significant role in the manifestation of adult asthma; however, scientific evidence about the relationship between airway microbial diversity and phenotypes of adult asthma is limited. Further research is needed to understand the interactions between the airway microbiota and host immune response to develop microbiota-based strategies in management of adult asthma. This study reviews the advances in culture-independent methods for detection of airway microbiome, the current data about airway microbiota in healthy individuals and in adult patients with asthma with a focus on bacterial communities, and the future research directions in airway microbiome.

The Saudi Initiative for Asthma - 2021 Update: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma in adults and children.

The Saudi Initiative for Asthma 2021 (SINA-2021) is the fifth version of asthma guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma for adults and children, which is developed by the SINA group, a subsidiary of the Saudi Thoracic Society. The main objective of the SINA is to have guidelines that are up to date, simple to understand, and easy to use by healthcare workers dealing with asthma patients. To facilitate achieving the goals of asthma management, the SINA panel approach is mainly based on the assessment of symptom control and risk for both adults and children. The approach to asthma management is aligned for age groups: adults, adolescents, children aged 5–12 years, and children aged less than 5 years. SINA guidelines have focused more on personalized approaches reflecting better understanding of disease heterogeneity with the integration of recommendations related to biologic agents, evidence-based updates on treatment, and the role of immunotherapy in management. Medication appendix has also been updated with the addition of recent evidence, new indications for existing medication, and new medications. The guidelines are constructed based on the available evidence, local literature, and the current situation at national and regional levels. There is also an emphasis on patient–doctor partnership in the management that also includes a self-management plan.

Challenges faced in managing adult asthma: A perspective from Asian countries.

Asthma imposes a significant burden on the health system and patients' quality of life. Within Asia, there is large variability in several cultural, social and economic factors ultimately influencing the management of asthma. Differences in risk factors and asthma management practices across Asia make asthma a truly 'mixed-bag' phenomenon. With the advent of biological agents and the consequent emphasis on asthma phenotyping and endotyping, it is more important than ever to understand the diverse nature of asthma as a disease. This is a collaborative review within Asia to highlight the differences in management of adult asthma, and the local modifications that are made to international guidelines. This review paves the way for a future Asian collaborative network in asthma epidemiological research.

A review of the burden and management of mild asthma in adults — Implications for clinical practice

Mild asthma is present in 50-75% of patients with asthma and is defined by the Global Initiative for Asthma as asthma that can be well controlled with low-intensity treatments (Steps 1 and 2). Despite this definition, 'mild' asthma is often not well controlled in reality, and can have a significant impact on an individual's symptom burden and quality of life. We performed a PubMed literature search to investigate the burden of 'mild' asthma in the lives of patients, including future risk and asthma control, and the current management strategies. While clinical guidelines recommend long-term, daily, low-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for 'mild' asthma, published data suggest that ICS are often under-prescribed or used intermittently as symptoms arise. Furthermore, patients and physicians tend to overestimate disease control, impacting the accuracy of diagnosing 'mild asthma' and subsequent management. This disconnect may be amplified by miscommunication between patients and physicians, limited objective assessment of control, and differences in guidelines. As with moderate and severe asthma, current evidence supports early initiation of regular ICS in 'mild' asthma to address the underlying inflammation, achieve symptom control and reduce risk of exacerbations. Adherence to ICS treatment is key and can be improved by educating both patients and healthcare professionals. The results of this literature search challenge the term 'mild' asthma and suggest strategies to improve the proactive management of the disease to enable patients to live symptom-free.

The Differences in Acute Management of Asthma in Adults and Children.

Acute asthma or wheeze is a common presentation to emergency services for both adults and children. Although there are phenotypic differences between asthma syndromes, the management of acute symptoms follow similar lines. This article looks at the similarities and differences in approaches for children and adults. Some of these may be age dependent, such as the physiological parameters used to define the severity of the attack or the use of age appropriate inhaler devices. Other differences may reflect the availability of evidence. In other areas there is conflicting evidence between adult and pediatric studies such as a temporary increase in dose of inhaled corticosteroids during an acute attack. Overall there are more similarities than differences.