Management Of Antithrombotic Therapy Research Articles

Temporal trends in antithrombotic therapy following transcatheter aortic valve implantation in denmark

Abstract Background A number of randomized clinical trials have examined the use of antithrombotic therapy after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), and guidelines have changed over time. Yet, data from clinical practise patterns are lacking and it is important to evaluate adherence to guideline recommendations over time. Purpose This study aims to evaluate the temporal use of antithrombotic therapy after TAVI in Denmark. Methods A nationwide Danish cohort of patients undergoing first-time TAVI from 2008 to 2017 were identified from Danish nationwide registries. Patients were categorized into four groups according to data on prescription filling of antithrombotic therapy within a three-months period post-TAVI: i) No antithrombotic therapy, ii) single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), iii) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), or iv) anticoagulant therapy. The use of antithrombotic therapy post-TAVI was examined for each year from 2008 to 2017. Results We identified 3187 patients undergoing first-time TAVI, among whom 120 (3.8%) did not receive any antithrombotic therapy, 715 (22.4%) were prescribed SAPT, 1244 (39.0%) were on DAPT, and 1108 (34.8%) were treated with anticoagulant therapy at three months post-TAVI. Patients without antithrombotic therapy were more often men (64.2%) and were more likely to have a history of malignancy (23.3%) compared with the other treatment groups. Patients who received oral anticoagulation had a higher burden of atrial fibrillation (75.7%). The proportion of patients with atrial fibrillation remained stable over time. During the first decade of TAVI, there was a shift in the antithrombotic treatment pattern: no therapy was ranging from 1.1% to 6.6%, SAPT from 19.1% to 29.4%, while DAPT decreased from 51.0% to 31.2% and anticoagulant therapy increased from 21.6% to 39.8% (Figure 1). Conclusion During the first decade of TAVI, antithrombotic therapy patterns post-TAVI changed substantially, such that the use of dual antiplatelet therapy decreased over time, while the use of anticoagulant therapy increased. Since atrial fibrillation remained stable over time, the increase in anticoagulant therapy is most likely due to changes in guidelines for management of atrial fibrillation in 2010. These findings show the evolving treatment patterns in the first decade of TAVI, which reflects the recommendations from clinical trials and guidelines for the management of antithrombotic therapy for patients with TAVI.

Perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy in elderly patients undergoing lumbar discectomy: a retrospective study on 163 patients.

The prevalence of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) has risen alongside the aging population, often necessitating neurosurgical intervention. However, managing antithrombotic medications in elderly patients with a history of major cardiovascular events (MACE) presents challenges, as treatment may require modification or cessation. This study aims to compare surgical outcomes among elderly patients receiving antithrombotic drugs and assess their impact and potential complications. The findings aim to inform the management of elderly patients with cardiovascular and spinal conditions undergoing neurosurgery. This retrospective, observational study was conducted at a single center. A total of 163 patients aged 60 or above who underwent lumbar discectomy for LDH were included. Patients were categorized into three groups based on their antithrombotic drug management: Group A (46 patients) replaced antiplatelet agents with low-dose aspirin for secondary prevention, Group B (54 patients) discontinued antiplatelet agents for primary prevention one week preoperatively and replaced them with LMWH, and Group C (63 patients) did not receive antithrombotic medication. Intraoperative blood loss, surgical time, and postoperative hospitalization were analyzed across all three groups. Continuous variables were compared between groups using the two-tailed Mann-Whitney test, with significance set at p < 0.05. No significant differences were found in intraoperative blood loss or surgical time among groups A, B, and C. Similarly, no significant differences were observed between groups B and C across all analyzed variables. No early or delayed hemorrhagic complications occurred perioperatively or during the 3-month postoperative follow-up period. The study suggests that elective discectomy surgery in patients receiving anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies may proceed without early complications and can be safely continued perioperatively. These findings have implications for the management of elderly patients requiring neurosurgical intervention in the context of cardiovascular comorbidities.

Management of antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing dental procedures

A growing number of patients receiving antithrombotic therapy require dental procedures. Dental interventions in these patients can be challenging, as the risk of bleeding from the continuation of antithrombotic therapy needs to be weighed against the thromboembolic risk associated with drug interruption or de-escalation. Most minor dental procedures, including simple dental cleaning and filling, pose minimal bleeding risk, and antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy can be continued without interruption. Local hemostatic measures, such as tranexamic mouthwash, can be used, as needed, to reduce bleeding events following these interventions. Managing antithrombotic therapy during more invasive dental interventions and oral surgeries with a higher risk of perioperative bleeding necessitates the consideration of specific factors influencing the bleeding risk and thromboembolism. In patients receiving antithrombotic therapy for primary prevention, temporary interruption is reasonable. In others, the decisions may be more complex and more nuanced. In this article, we review the current evidence for managing patients receiving oral antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs scheduled for various dental procedures and present a practical approach for the periprocedural management of antithrombotic treatments.

Evaluation of Long-term Antithrombotic Management for Atrial Fibrillation Patients with a History of Coronary Stent Implantation

Purpose: American expert consensus publications recommend discontinuation of antiplatelet agents 6 to 12 months after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) in patients with Atrial Fibrillation (AF) who require chronic anticoagulation, and use of oral anticoagulant monotherapy thereafter. This study aimed to assess real-world long-term antithrombotic therapy management practices and factors associated with the continuation of antiplatelet agents past 12 months post-PCI in patients with AF requiring chronic anticoagulation. Methods: Patients with AF and a history of PCI greater than 12 months before their most recent encounter with physicians at an outpatient electrophysiology clinic were identified by chart review. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and current antithrombotic regimen were collected from encounters that occurred between July 2019 and June 2022. The independent predictive factors associated with the continuation of antiplatelet agents were identified using univariate and regression analyses. Results: Out of 66 patients, 67% continued antiplatelet therapy for greater than 12 months post-PCI. Patients on antiplatelets were significantly less likely to have bare metal stents (p = 0.006), be greater than five years post-PCI (p = 0.002), and have a HASBLED score of two or less (p = 0.028) when compared to patients on oral anticoagulant monotherapy. Bare metal stent history (p = 0.045) and HASBLED score of two or less (p = 0.016) were also significant in regression analysis. Conclusion: This study found that most patients with AF and a history of PCI continued antiplatelet therapy longer than 12 months post-PCI, often despite the high bleeding risk.

The (dis)continuing of antithrombotic drugs and its implications for occurrence of adverse cardiovascular and bleeding events in cancer patients during end of life

Background and ObjectivesFor patients receiving end-of-life care, adjusting polypharmacy and deprescription of potentially harmful medicines are important impactors on quality-of-life. Antithrombotic therapies (ATT) are used by 30-50% of patients with cancer, rising to 80% in older cancer patients, and are often continued until a quality-of-life-impacting bleeding event, or a patient is physically unable to take oral medication. We aimed to describe the use of ATT and occurrence of clinical outcomes in patients with cancer during end-of-life care. ApproachLinked health and administrative data in SAIL were used to identify end-of-life cancer patients diagnosed in Wales, focusing on cancer types with an estimated 1-year survival time. Survival analysis was used to describe current ATT usage and to investigate the associations between ATT usage and major cardiovascular and bleeding events. Results21,880 individuals were diagnosed with the pre-defined cancer types between January 2013 and December 2019, 5,660 (26%) of these were taking ATT at diagnosis. During the study period 1670 (30%) were discontinued. Median survival time of patients taking ATT at diagnosis was 169 (IQR 158-180) days, while median time to deprescription was 206 (IQR 190-224) days. Among ATT-users diagnosis, 460 (8%) and 900 (16%) experienced a major bleed or a cardiovascular event, respectively, within 1 year following diagnosis, compared to 1100 (7%) and 1930 (12%) among those who were not prescribed ATT at diagnosis. Conclusions and ImplicationsOur research highlights the need for careful assessment and management of ATT in the interest of improving quality-of-life for patients with cancer during end-of-life care.

Bridging With Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Versus Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Comprehensive Review.

This review article discussed the use of bridging therapy with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in patients who undergo noncardiac surgery (NCS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients who undergo PCI are at an increased risk of thrombotic events due to their underlying cardiovascular disease. However, many of these patients may require NCS at some point in their lives, which poses a significant challenge for clinicians as they balance the risk of thrombotic events against the risk of bleeding associated with antithrombotic therapy. This review evaluates the current evidence on the use of bridging therapy with LMWH in patients undergoing NCS after PCI, focusing on outcomes related to the efficacy and safety of antithrombotic therapy. The article also discusses the limitations of the current evidence and highlights areas where further research is needed to optimize the management of antithrombotic therapy in this patient population. The goal of this review was to provide clinicians with a comprehensive summary of the available evidence to guide clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes.

Management and outcomes of antithrombotic therapy in EUS-guided gallbladder drainage

Background and AimsEndoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GB) is increasingly used for the management of gallbladder disease in patients at high risk for cholecystectomy. These patients often have underlying medical comorbidities requiring anticoagulation and/or antiplatelet therapy. We evaluated the safety, management, and outcomes of EUS-GB in patients being treated with antithrombotic therapy (ATT). MethodsWe performed a retrospective study of patients undergoing EUS-GB between 2018 to 2023 within Geisinger Health System. Outcomes were analyzed between patients previously on ATT but held for the procedure compared to no ATT. The primary outcomes were bleeding within 48 hours and 30 days. Secondary outcomes included risk of thrombotic events, length of stay (LOS) and 30-day mortality. ResultsOf 177 patients undergoing EUS-GB, 118 patients were on ATT. There was a lack of statistical difference for EUS-GB related bleeding for patients on ATT compared to no ATT within 48 hours (0.9% vs 0%, p>0.999) or within 30 days (3.5% vs 0%, p=0.302). Overall, five patients (2.9%) had bleeding related to the EUS-GB procedure. There was no difference between the groups for secondary outcomes: thrombotic events (2.5% vs 3.4%), LOS (7d vs 5d) and 30-day mortality (11% vs 10.2%). ConclusionPatients undergoing EUS-GB who require ATT did not have any immediate or delayed increased risk of bleeding, thrombotic events, LOS, or mortality, when the medication was appropriately held.

Perioperative Management of Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation in Brain Tumor Surgery: A Survey of International Practices

Perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy is a necessary preprocedural consideration for patients prescribed direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), vitamin K antagonists, or antiplatelet medications. There is a lack of evidence-based guidelines to help inform decision-making in managing antiplatelet and anticoagulation medications in the perioperative period around brain tumor resection. The objective of this study was to provide an example of the heterogeneity in practice and raise awareness for the need to create standardized guidelines for managing these medications. A survey was sent to a list of over 800 international neurosurgeons who are members of the Neurosurgery Research Listserv. The survey comprised 70 questions assessing individual practices for managing thromboprophylaxis, antiplatelet medications, and anticoagulation in the perioperative period. The survey was sent via e-mail invitation between March 2021 and June2021. A total of 72 surgeons responded to the survey. There was no difference in medication management preoperatively or postoperatively when comparing intra- and extra-axial tumor resections. Cessation of antiplatelet medications varied between 3 and 11 days while restart varied between 1 and 14 days. Preoperative management of vitamin K antagonists varied between indication for use (P < 0.001) while DOAC management did not. In our group of respondents, 90% started heparin products within 5 days of surgery, while the same fraction restarted DOAC within 14 days. Respondents demonstrated significant heterogeneity in their perioperative management of antiplatelet and anticoagulation medication in brain tumor resection. This may lead to an unacceptable level of heterogeneity in practice that has the potential to cause patient harm due to errors in medication management.

Perioperative Management of Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients Undergoing Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Practical Tool Based on Current Guidelines

Introduction: Given the aging population, plastic surgeons are increasingly faced with the challenge of balancing procedural bleeding risk with thromboembolic risk in patients receiving antithrombotic therapies undergoing elective procedures. Guideline recommendations remain unclear in this population, which contributes to heterogeneity in clinical practices. We present a practical approach that summarizes guideline recommendations to facilitate the perioperative management of patients requiring surgery who are already on antithrombotic agents. Methods: Due to the scarcity of plastic surgery-specific guidelines, recommendations were primarily adapted from the 2022 American College of Chest Physicians guidelines on perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy as they are recognized as authoritative and widely used in clinical practice. Results: A clinical practice conceptual framework was adapted based on preexisting guidelines, dividing decision-making into 3 steps: (1) assessing the procedural bleeding risk; (2) assessing the patients’ thromboembolic risk; and (3) determining appropriate management according to antithrombotic agent type. Specific indications are provided for continuing, stopping, and bridging anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents, as well as for consultation with a cardiologist or hematologist. Conclusion: The present framework can be implemented in plastic surgeons’ clinical practice to guide the management of patients on antithrombotic therapies, while minimizing nonessential referrals to the thrombosis service. The lack of plastic surgery-specific guidelines on this topic highlights a need for further research to “bootstrap” the risk categorization of plastic surgical procedures and their appropriate perioperative management.

Inpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation Following Heart Valve Surgey: A Setting for the Tailored Management of Antithrombotic Therapy.

Inpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation Following Heart Valve Surgey: A Setting for the Tailored Management of Antithrombotic Therapy.

Addendum: Treatment of atrial fibrillation.

The Interruption of Anticoagulation section of our article on Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation cited the recommendations of the American College of Chest Physicians on perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy (JD Douketis et al. Chest 2022; 162:e207). A reader suggested that our general statement on when to discontinue an oral anticoagulant would have benefited from inclusion of the recommendations of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (JA Joglar et al. Circulation 2024; 149:e1).

Antithrombotic therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome: similarities and differences between a European expert consensus document and the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines.

Antithrombotic therapy represents the cornerstone of the pharmacological treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The optimal combination and duration of antithrombotic therapy is still matter of debate requiring a critical assessment of patient comorbidities, clinical presentation, revascularization modality, and/or optimization of medical treatment. The 2023 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the management of patients with ACS encompassing both patients with and without ST segment elevation ACS have been recently published. Shortly before, a European expert consensus task force produced guidance for clinicians on the management of antithrombotic therapy in patients with ACS as well as chronic coronary syndrome. The scope of this manuscript is to provide a critical appraisal of differences and similarities between the European consensus paper and the latest ESC recommendations on oral antithrombotic regimens in ACS patients.

SIED-GISCOR recommendations for colonoscopy in screening programs: Part I – Diagnostic

The implementation of FIT programs reduces incidence and mortality from CRC in the screened subjects. The ultimate efficacy for CRC morbidity and mortality prevention in a FIT program depends on the colonoscopy in FIT+ subjects that has the task of detecting and removing these advanced lesions. Recently, there has been growing evidence on factors that influence the quality of colonoscopy specifically withing organized FIT programs, prompting to dedicated interventions in order to maximize the benefit/harm ratio of post-FIT colonoscopy. This document focuses on the diagnostic phase of colonoscopy, providing indications on how to standardise colonoscopy in FIT+ subjects, regarding timing of examination, management of antithrombotic therapy, bowel preparation, competence and sedation.

Antithrombotic Therapy after Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Evidence, Challenges and Future Directions.

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has been established in clinical practice as an attractive alternative to oral anticoagulation for preventing stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation and high bleeding risk. The devices approved in Europe and United States (US) for percutaneous LAAC contain metal and antithrombotic therapy is strongly recommended after their implantation to prevent apposition of thrombus on the atrial surface of the device during endothelialization. However, there is still uncertainty regarding the optimal antithrombotic drug regimen following device implantation in view of the incomplete understanding of the LAAC device healing process, the lack of randomized clinical trials comparing different antithrombotic agents after LAAC and the heterogeneous bleeding risk of patients undergoing LAAC. Thus, this review aims to evaluate the available evidence and the remaining challenges related to the post-LAAC antithrombotic regimens. Furthermore, common clinical scenarios associated with challenging management of antithrombotic therapy after LAAC and potential future directions, will be discussed.

Perioperative Management of Anticoagulation and Antithrombotic Therapy

The latest updates to the NCCN Guidelines for perioperative management of anticoagulation and antithrombotic therapies reflect significant changes in the use of bridging anticoagulation. For patients with low- to intermediate-risk atrial fibrillation, the standard of care has shifted toward reduced reliance on bridging anticoagulation. The rationale for this shift is based on the BRIDGE trial, which revealed a 3-fold greater risk of major bleeding without significant reduction in thrombotic outcomes in patients receiving bridging therapy. In patients with mechanical heart valves, findings from the PERIOP2 study led to similar conclusions. Both of these studies have contributed to a paradigm shift in perioperative anticoagulation management, pivoting toward personalized therapy based on patient-specific bleeding and thrombotic risks. For emergent or elective surgeries, the NCCN Guidelines provide a framework for more individualized decision-making, emphasizing the need for ongoing cooperation among physicians, surgeons, and patients.

Stroke and Mechanical Circulatory Support in Adults.

Short-term and durable mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices represent life-saving interventions for patients with cardiogenic shock and end-stage heart failure. This review will cover the epidemiology, risk factors, and treatment of stroke in this patient population. Short-term devices such as intra-aortic balloon pump, Impella, TandemHeart, and Venoatrial Extracorporal Membrane Oxygenation, as well as durable continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), improve cardiac output and blood flow to the vital organs. However, MCS use is associated with high rates of complications, including ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes which carry a high risk for death and disability. Improvements in MCS technology have reduced but not eliminated the risk of stroke. Mitigation strategies focus on careful management of anti-thrombotic therapies. While data on therapeutic options for stroke are limited, several case series reported favorable outcomes with thrombectomy for ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusions, as well as with reversal of anticoagulation for those with hemorrhagic stroke. Stroke in patients treated with MCS is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Preventive strategies are targeted based on the specific form of MCS. Improvements in the design of the newest generation device have reduced the risk of ischemic stroke, though hemorrhagic stroke remains a serious complication.

Rational peri-operative management of antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing radical cystectomy: A 30-day morbidity analysis based on the updated European Association of Urology guidelines for standardized complication reporting

BackgroundRadical cystectomy (RC) in bladder cancer patients with cardiovascular comorbidity poses challenges due to the need for antithrombotic therapy and high perioperative risk. We aimed to assess 30-day complications after RC in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy. Patients and methodsRetrospective study of 416 bladder cancer patients (2009–2017) undergoing open RC with pelvic lymph node dissection, with or without antithrombotic therapy. Antithrombotic therapy and complication reporting followed European guidelines. Procedure-specific 30-day complications were cataloged, graded (Clavien-Dindo), and quantified using the 30-day Comprehensive Complication Index. Multivariable regressions evaluated antithrombotic therapy's independent effect on key morbidity outcomes. ResultsMedian age was 70 years, 78% were male. Patients on antithrombotic therapy were mostly male, had higher comorbidity burden, worse kidney function, more frequent incontinent diversion, and shorter operative time (all p ≤ 0.027). Bleeding complications occurred in 135 patients (32%; 95%CI = 28–37%), more prevalent with antithrombotic therapy (46% vs. 29%; p = 0.004). Thromboembolic complications occurred in 18 patients (4.3%; 95%CI = 2.6–6.8%), no difference between patients with and without antithrombotic therapy (8.4% vs. 3.3%; p = 0.063). Prevalence of myocardial infarction, new-onset hypertension, acute congestive heart failure, and angina pectoris showed no difference (all p ≥ 0.3). Multivariable analyses indicated no association between antithrombotic therapy and cardiac complications, 30-day major complications, or cumulative morbidity (all p ≥ 0.2). Antithrombotic therapy was associated with bleeding complications (OR = 1.92; 95%CI = 1.07–3.45; p = 0.028), predominantly transfusion-related (75% of 152 bleeding complications). Limitations include retrospective data assessment with biases. ConclusionsRC in patients on antithrombotic therapy exhibits a higher incidence of adverse events due to underlying comorbidities. Adherence to thromboprophylaxis guidelines enables safe RC in patients with significant comorbidities, without substantial increase in major bleeding or severe thromboembolic events.

The implications of antithrombotic agents on subdural hematoma evacuation: what does "reversal" truly entail?

The optimal perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy (ATT) in patients requiring urgent neurosurgical intervention for subdural hematoma (SDH) is poorly understood. The delicate equilibrium of effective hemostasis while preventing thrombosis is complex and relies on numerous factors such as indication for and type of ATT, medical comorbidities, and extent of neurological injury. This study aimed to analyze the impact of ATT and reversal strategies on surgical outcomes to highlight current challenges in the management of these high-risk patients. The authors performed a retrospective surgical cohort analysis of 100 patients undergoing urgent SDH evacuation at a level I trauma center between March 2020 and May 2021. The patients were first stratified into two cohorts based on preoperative ATT use and then further segregated by receipt of reversal agents. Statistical analysis included the chi-square test, Welch two-sample t-test, and multivariate logistic regression. The primary outcome was mortality. Secondary endpoints included radiographic SDH reexpansion, revision surgery, improvement in preoperative neurological deficits, and incidence of thromboembolism. A crossover cohort was secondarily analyzed in patients for whom ATT was interrupted for a minimum duration equal to effective drug metabolism. Finally, ATT reinitiation patterns were examined. Of 100 patients, 48% received ATT, 54.2% of whom were given reversal agents. ATT use was significantly associated with decreased rates of postoperative neurological improvement (p = 0.023) with trends toward increased mortality (p = 0.078), SDH reexpansion (p = 0.12), and need for revision surgery (p = 0.10). Patient crossover revealed a 4 times greater likelihood of death in patients without ATT interruption prior to surgery (p = 0.040) without an observable impact on secondary outcomes. ATT reversal contributed no improvement in outcomes other than a decreased intensive care unit length of stay when adjusted for in-hospital mortality (p = 0.014). The rate of postoperative thromboembolism following ATT reversal was 11.5%. ATT reinitiation was highly variable, occurring in 59.5% of patients, with median times of 17 and 15 days for antiplatelets and anticoagulants, respectively. Use of preoperative ATT portends poor clinical outcomes following nonelective SDH evacuation regardless of attempts to reverse these medications with replacement blood products. This study further reinforces the critical need for judicious use of ATT and optimization of reversal strategies in high-risk patient populations as best guided by multidisciplinary teams and evolving clinical practice guidelines.

Antiplatelet and Anti-Coagulation Therapy for Left-Sided Catheter Ablations: What Is beyond Atrial Fibrillation?

Aim: International guidelines on the use of anti-thrombotic therapies in left-sided ablations other than atrial fibrillation (AF) are lacking. The data regarding antiplatelet or anticoagulation strategies after catheter ablation (CA) procedures mainly derive from AF, whereas for the other arrhythmic substrates, the anti-thrombotic approach remains unclear. This survey aims to explore the current practices regarding antithrombotic management before, during, and after left-sided endocardial ablation, not including atrial fibrillation (AF), in patients without other indications for anti-thrombotic therapy. Material and Methods: Electrophysiologists were asked to answer a questionnaire containing questions on antiplatelet (APT) and anticoagulation therapy for the following left-sided procedures: accessory pathway (AP), atrial (AT), and ventricular tachycardia (VT) with and without structural heart disease (SHD). Results: We obtained 41 answers from 41 centers in 15 countries. For AP, before ablation, only four respondents (9.7%) used antiplatelets and two (4.9%) used anticoagulants. At discharge, APT therapy was prescribed by 22 respondents (53.7%), and oral anticoagulant therapy (OAC) only by one (2.4%). In patients with atrial tachycardia (AT), before ablation, APT prophylaxis was prescribed by only four respondents (9.7%) and OAC by eleven (26.8%). At discharge, APT was recommended by 12 respondents (29.3%) and OAC by 24 (58.5%). For VT without SHD, before CA, only six respondents (14.6%) suggested APT and three (7.3%) suggested OAC prophylaxis. At discharge, APT was recommended by fifteen respondents (36.6%) and OAC by five (12.2%). Regarding VT in SHD, before the procedure, eight respondents (19.5%) prescribed APT and five (12.2%) prescribed OAC prophylaxis. At discharge, the administration of anti-thrombotic therapy depended on the LV ejection fraction for eleven respondents (26.8%), on the procedure time for ten (24.4%), and on the radiofrequency time for four (9.8%), with a cut-off value from 1 to 30 min. Conclusions: Our survey indicates that the management of anti-thrombotic therapy surrounding left-sided endocardial ablation of patients without other indications for anti-thrombotic therapy is highly variable. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the safest approach to these procedures.

What Surgeons Need to Know About the Recent Updates to the CHEST Guidelines on Antithrombotic Therapy for Venous Thromboembolic Disease and Perioperative Management of Antithrombotic Therapy.

*Department of Surgery †Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia School of Medicine The authors report no conflicts of interest. [email protected]