Management Of Antiplatelet Therapy Research Articles

Incidence and clinical impact of inappropriate periprocedural and perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy

Background and aimsThere is little evidence on the impact of current recommendations on the use of antiplatelet therapy during the perioperative and periprocedural period in our setting. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and clinical impact of inappropriate use of antiplatelet therapy in a population of patients undergoing surgery or a diagnostic or therapeutic procedure in “real life” in Spain. MethodsA prospective multicenter observational study of patients treated with antiplatelet agents requiring intervention was conducted. The incidence of thrombotic and hemorrhagic events at 30 days was analyzed according to peri-intervention management of antiplatelet therapy. ResultsWe included 643 patients (31.9% women, 39.0% over 75 years of age), most of them (87.7%) receiving aspirin as antiplatelet therapy at a dose of 100mg/day. Indications for antiplatelet therapy were ischemic heart disease (44.9%), cerebrovascular disease (21.7%), and peripheral vascular disease (23.0%). Ischemic risk was low in 74.3%, while 51.6% had a low bleeding risk of the intervention. Periprocedural management was considered appropriate in 61.7% of cases. 30-day incidence of the combined primary endpoint of thrombotic events and major bleeding (12.1% versus 5.0%; p=0.002) and 30-day mortality (5.2% versus 1.5%; p=0.008) were significantly higher in patients with inappropriate periprocedural management of antiplatelet agents. ConclusionsDespite current recommendations for the use of antiplatelet drugs in the perioperative/periprocedural period, their implementation in the “real world” remains low. Inappropriate use is associated with an increased incidence of adverse events, both thrombotic and hemorrhagic.

S955 Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Management During Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Real-World Nationwide Analysis

S955 Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Management During Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Real-World Nationwide Analysis

Coronary artery bypass grafting in acute coronary syndromes: modern indications and approaches.

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with approximately 1.2 million hospitalizations annually in the U.S. This review aims to explore the contemporary evidence regarding revascularization strategies, including percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), in ACS patients. It also addresses the unresolved questions concerning the optimal procedural aspects of surgery and antithrombotic therapy for secondary prevention postsurgery. Recent studies highlight that while PCI is generally preferred for its timeliness in high-risk non-ST-elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS) patients, CABG offers a benefit in terms of cardiovascular events in those with multivessel disease, particularly in the presence of diabetes and higher coronary disease complexity. For ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), CABG is less frequently utilized due to the preference for primary PCI, but it remains crucial for patients with complex anatomy or failed PCI. Furthermore, the optimal timing and type of antiplatelet therapy post-CABG remain controversial, with current evidence supporting the use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to reduce ischemic events but necessitating careful management to balance bleeding risks. In patients with ACS, the choice between PCI and CABG depends on the complexity of coronary disease and patient comorbidities. CABG is particularly beneficial for multivessel disease in NSTE-ACS and specific STEMI cases where PCI is not feasible. The management of antiplatelet therapy postsurgery requires a nuanced approach to minimize bleeding risks while preventing thrombotic complications. Further randomized clinical trials are needed to solidify these findings and guide clinical practice.

Prior coronary stent does not exclude major pulmonary resection regardless of antiplatelet therapy.

We assessed the safety of general thoracic surgery in patients with prior coronary stents undergoing lung resection, based on differences in perioperative antiplatelet therapy management. We retrospectively examined 150 patients with coronary artery stents who underwent pulmonary resection between July 2009 and July 2018. The impact of the antiplatelet agent on thoracic surgery safety was assessed by comparing perioperative outcomes, including major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, among the discontinued antiplatelet therapy (group D), heparin bridging (group H), and continuous antiplatelet therapy (group C) groups. Groups D, H, and C included twenty-four, eighty-four, and forty-two patients, respectively. Second-generation drug-eluting stents were used in > 50% of the patients. No significant differences were found in the estimated blood loss, transfusion rate, or operative duration. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events occurred in four (2.7%) patients, which was comparable among the groups. In group H, postoperative heart failure and transient ischemic attack with stroke occurred in one patient each. Major bleeding occurred in two (4.7%) patients in group C. Pulmonary resection surgical outcomes in patients with coronary artery stents were feasible regardless of antiplatelet therapy continuation. However, discontinuing dual-antiplatelet or single-antiplatelet therapy in such patients may be reasonable because this generation of drug-eluting stents has a higher safety profile than bare-metal and first-generation drug-eluting stents.

Antiplatelet Therapy for Elderly Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

The elderly represent an increasing proportion of patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Various data have shown that the benefits of percutaneous coronary revascularization are maintained in elderly patients presenting with ACS. Conversely, the management of antiplatelet therapy remains challenging and controversial, because older patients are usually at a high risk of both ischemia and bleeding. Moreover, the recommended ischemic and bleeding risk scores in patients with ACS were developed from studies with a low representation of older patients. New antiplatelet strategies have been developed, but their evidence in elderly patients is limited because they are usually underrepresented in randomized clinical trials due to their clinical complexity. The aim of this review is to summarize the different factors associated with increased ischemic and/or bleeding risk and the scientific evidence about the different antiplatelet strategies in elderly patients presenting with ACS and undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization.

Feasibility and Safety of Bridging Antiplatelet Therapy with Cangrelor in Neuro-Oncology: A Preliminary Experience.

Antiplatelet therapy is mandatory for prevention of thrombotic events in patients with a recent history of acute coronary syndromes and/or percutaneous coronary interventions. However, if an urgent surgery is required during antiplatelet therapy, a compromise between the ischemic/thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk has to be reached. Different bridging schemes are reported in the literature, but there is no clear consensus on the optimal treatment strategy in terms of efficacy and safety. Although some indications about the perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy regarding specific surgical specializations are available, balancing the thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk on an individual basis, no evidence referring to neurosurgical or neuro-oncologic procedures is reported. Herein, we present our preliminary experience in the perioperative management of a patient who underwent a neurosurgical procedure for the resection of a primary malignant brain tumor using an intravenous P2Y12 inhibitor (cangrelor) as bridging therapy after a recent acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention and stenting. The oral P2Y12 inhibitor (clopidogrel) was withdrawn 5 days prior to the surgical procedure and continuous infusion of cangrelor was started 3 days before the surgery at a dose of 0.75 μg/kg/min. Cangrelor was discontinued 2 hours before surgery and resumed 72 hours after tumor resection for further 60 hours. Neither cangrelor-related bleeding nor cardiac ischemic events were observed in the perioperative period and the following 90 days, supporting data regarding the feasibility and safety of this bridging scheme. Further studies are needed to confirm our promising results.

Bleeding Risk With Antiplatelets and Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi), known for their off-target antiplatelet effects and increased bleeding risk, have become more frequently used in patients with cancer with lymphoid malignancies. When encountering patients on BTKi who also require antiplatelet therapies, particularly dual-antiplatelet therapy that is a well-established treatment after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the potential increase in bleeding risk raises concern. The development of new-generation BTKi with a higher selectivity, such as acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib, could be an answer to this conundrum, but bleeding still occurs. It is important that the interventional cardiologist becomes familiar with agents that could affect the management of antiplatelet therapy in patients treated with PCI.

Perioperative Management of Antiplatelet Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

ObjectiveTo summarize the available evidence about the perioperative management of patients who are receiving long-term antiplatelet therapy and require elective surgery/procedures.MethodsThis systematic review supports the development of the American College of Chest Physicians guideline on the perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy. A literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane databases was conducted from each database’s inception to July 16, 2020. Meta-analyses were conducted when possible.ResultsIn patients receiving long-term antiplatelet therapy and undergoing elective noncardiac surgery, the available evidence did not show a significant difference in major bleeding between a shorter vs longer antiplatelet interruption, with low certainty of evidence (COE). Compared with patients who received placebo perioperatively, aspirin continuation was associated with increased risk of major bleeding (relative risk [RR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.15-1.50; high COE) and lower risk of major thromboembolism (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.58-0.94; moderate COE). During antiplatelet interruption, bridging with low-molecular-weight heparin was associated with increased risk of major bleeding compared with no bridging (RR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.24-2.79; very low COE). Continuation of antiplatelets during minor dental and ophthalmologic procedures was not associated with a statistically significant difference in the risk of major bleeding (very low COE).ConclusionThis systematic review summarizes the current evidence about the perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy and highlights the urgent need for further research, particularly with the increasing prevalence of patients taking 1 or more antiplatelet agents.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: update on treatment and strategies to improve the diagnostic and therapeutic pathway

Spontaneous coronary dissection is an infrequent cause of acute coronary syndrome, which has been understood only recently in terms of pathophysiology, presentation, diagnosis and treatment. In particular, new evidence has emerged on its treatment in the interventional and medical fields, especially on the management of antiplatelet therapy, which is presented in this review; moreover, the local experience of the registry of spontaneous coronary dissections DISCO and its role in improving the management of these patients are reported.

Predictors of antiplatelet cessation in a real-world patient population undergoing non-cardiac surgery after PCI

BackgroundThe optimal perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy (APT) therapy in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery (NCS) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unclear. We sought to identify predictors of APT cessation in a real-world cohort of patients undergoing NCS within 1 year of PCI. MethodsConsecutive patients undergoing PCI at a tertiary center between 2011 and 2018 were prospectively enrolled. Perioperative interruption of APT was defined as cessation of either aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitor between 1 and 14 days prior to NCS. Predictors of APT discontinuation were identified by multivariable Cox regression with stepwise selection of candidate variables. ResultsA total of 1092 surgeries corresponding to 747 patients were identified. Overall, there were 487 (44.6%) preoperative antiplatelet interruptions: discontinuation of either P2Y12 inhibitors only (47.4%), aspirin only (7.9%), or both agents (44.7%). Both patient-specific risk factors (prior stroke, lower BMI, anemia, MI) and procedure specific risk factors (chronic total occlusions, multivessel disease, drug-eluting stent use) affected decisions regarding APT cessation. Likelihood of APT cessation increased in higher-risk surgeries and in patients on more potent P2Y12 inhibitors (ticagrelor/prasugrel vs clopidogrel) whereas those undergoing NCS <90 days post PCI were less likely to have cessation of APT. ConclusionIn this contemporary cohort of post-PCI patients undergoing NCS, patient-, angiographic- and surgery-specific factors all affected decision-making regarding APT cessation. Our findings reflective of real-world practice, highlight the importance of a multidisciplinary team approach to individualize decision making in these patients.

Impact of aspirin discontinuation on thrombotic complications in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.

The number of patients taking antiplatelet therapy is increasing. However, there is no definitive guideline for the perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy. Conventionally, the discontinuation of antiplatelet drugs has been the basic treatment as perioperative management. Therefore, we investigated the risk of discontinuing aspirin concerning thrombotic complications in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Between January 2015 and December 2019, a total of 729 patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in Toyonaka Municipal Hospital. Sixty-four patients taking antithrombotic drugs aside from aspirin were excluded from this study; the remaining 665 patients were considered eligible and divided into three groups. The patients not taking aspirin were classified as the "Control group" (n = 588). Among the patients taking aspirin, those who continued preoperative aspirin were classified as the "Aspirin group" (n = 30), and those who discontinued preoperative aspirin were classified as the "No-aspirin group" (n = 47). The Aspirin, No-aspirin, and Control groups were compared retrospectively. Among the 3 groups, there were no significant difference in operative time (p = 0.14), bleeding volume (p = 0.63), or postoperative hospital stay (p = 0.06). Assessing the postoperative complication, bleeding complications were significantly more frequent in the Aspirin group (p < 0.01), although those complications were all Clavien-Dindo grade II. In contrast, thrombotic complications were significantly more frequent in the No-aspirin group (p < 0.01). Note that those complications were all Clavien-Dindo Grade III/IV. This result suggested that discontinuing aspirin increased the risk of severe thrombotic complication. Discontinuation of aspirin as perioperative management in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery increased the risk of severe thrombotic complications.

Management of antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndrome patients with thrombocytopenia

Összefoglaló. Az akut coronaria szindrómán (ACS) átesett betegek kezelésének alappillére a kettős (aszpirin + klopidogrél ) thrombocytaaggregáció-gátló kezelés. Az immunthrombocytopeniás purpurás (ITP-s) betegek - és különösen azok, akik refrakter ITP miatt thrombopoetinanalóg kezelésben részesülnek - külön elbírálást igényelnek. 50-100 G/l thrombocytaszám közötti és vérzéses szövődménnyel nem rendelkező ACS-s betegeken a gyógyszerkibocsátó stent beültetését követően kettős thrombocytaaggregáció-gátló kezelést csak 1 hónapig kell alkalmazni (ez az időtartam átlagos vérzéses rizikójú betegeken 1 év), majd klopidogrél-monoterápia javasolt. Munkánk során a 2015. január 1. és 2020. október 1. között a Semmelweis Egyetem I. Belgyógyászati Klinikáján kezelt ITP-s betegek körében vizsgáltuk az ACS előfordulását és lefolyását. Klinikánkon az elmúlt 5 évben gondozott, 168 ITP-s beteg közül 3 beteg esetében alakult ki ACS. A refrakter ITP kezelésének részeként mind a 3 beteg thrombopoetinanalóg - (2 beteg romiplosztim-, 1 beteg eltrombopág-) kezelésben részesült. A 3 ITP-s betegünk egyikénél sem alakult ki vérzéses szövődmény a thrombopoetinanalóg-kezelés és a thrombocytaaggregáció-gátlás mellett. Első betegünk esetében 5 év alatt három alkalommal alakult ki ACS (egy ízben fémstentet és két alkalommal gyógyszerkibocsátó stentet kapott). A második betegnél két alkalommal (1 év különbséggel), a harmadik betegnél egy esetben történt gyógyszerkibocsátó stent beültetése. ITP és ACS együttes fennállása esetén az akut és a hosszú távú gyógyszeres kezelés egyéni mérlegelést igényel. Ezen speciális betegcsoport számára a kezelési irányelv kidolgozása megfontolandó. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(33): 1335-1340. Summary. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) consisting of aspirin and clopidogrel is essential in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) patients - and especially those receiving thrombopoietin analog (TPO) treatment - deserve special attention. In ACS patients with platelet counts between 50 G/L and 100 G/L and no bleeding symptoms, DAPT is indicated for 1 month after the placement of new generation drug-eluting stents (the length of treatment is 1 year in the case of patients with average bleeding risk) followed by clopidogrel monotherapy. In patients with average bleeding risk, DAPT is recommended for 1 year after the ACS. Our aim was to investigate the incidence and outcome of ACS in ITP patients, who were treated in our clinic between 1st January 2015 and 1st October 2020. Out of 168 patients treated for ITP, 3 patients suffered from ACS in the last 5 years. These patients received TPO treatment (2 patients subcutan romiplostim, 1 patient oral eltrombopag). None of these ITP patients treated with DAPT and with TPO analog suffered from bleeding complications. 1 patient developed ACS three times within the last 5 years (he received bare-metal stent once and drug-eluting stent twice). Drug-eluting stent was placed once in the third, and twice (with 1 year difference) in the second patient. Acute and long-term medication of patients suffering from both ITP and ACS is a challenging task and needs individual evaluation. Establishment of treatment guidelines for this special group is warranted. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(33): 1335-1340.

Perioperative dual antiplatelet therapy for patients undergoing spine surgery soon after drug eluting stent placement.

Background: Performing emergent spinal surgery within 6 months of percutaneous placement of drug-eluting coronary stent (DES) is complex. The risks of spinal bleeding in a “closed space” must be compared with the risks of stent thrombosis or major cardiac event from dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) interruption.Methods: Eighty relevant English language papers published in PubMed were reviewed in detail.Results: Variables considered regarding surgery in patients on DAPT for DES included: (1) surgical indications, (2) percutaneous cardiac intervention (PCI) type (balloon angioplasty vs. stenting), (3) stent type (drug-eluting vs. balloon mechanical stent), and (4) PCI to noncardiac surgery interval. The highest complication rate was observed within 6 weeks of stent placement, this corresponds to the endothelialization phase. Few studies document how to manage patients with critical spinal disease warranting operative intervention within 6 months of their PCI for DES placement.Conclusion: The treatment of patients requiring urgent or emergent spinal surgery within 6 months of undergoing a PCI for DES placement is challenging. As early interruption of DAPT may have catastrophic consequences, we hereby proposed a novel protocol involving stopping clopidogrel 5 days before and aspirin 3 days before spinal surgery, and bridging the interval with a reversible P2Y12 inhibitor until surgery. Moreover, postoperatively, aspirin could be started on postoperative day 1 and clopidogrel on day 2. Nevertheless, this treatment strategy may not be appropriate for all patients, and multidisciplinary approval of perioperative antiplatelet therapy management protocols is essential.

Consensus Decision-Making for the Management of Antiplatelet Therapy before Non-Cardiac Surgery in Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents: A Cohort Study.

BackgroundAlthough antiplatelet therapy (APT) has been recommended to balance ischemic‐bleeding risks, it has been left to an individualized decision‐making based on physicians' perspectives before non‐cardiac surgery. The study aimed to assess the advantages of a consensus among physicians, surgeons, and anesthesiologists on continuation and regimen of preoperative APT in patients with coronary drug‐eluting stents.Methods and ResultsA total of 3582 adult patients undergoing non‐cardiac surgery after percutaneous coronary intervention with second‐generation stents was retrospectively included from a multicenter cohort. Physicians determined whether APT should be continued or discontinued for a recommended period before non‐cardiac surgery. There were 3103 patients who complied with a consensus decision. Arbitrary APT, not based on a consensus decision, was associated with urgent surgery, high bleeding risk of surgery, female sex, and dual APT at the time of preoperative evaluation. Arbitrary APT independently increased the net clinical adverse event (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj], 1.98; 95% CI, 1.98–3.11), major adverse cardiac event (ORadj, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.31–7.34), and major bleeding (ORadj, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.45–3.76) risks. The association was consistently noted, irrespective of the surgical risks, recommendations, and practice on discontinuation of APT.ConclusionsMost patients were treated in agreement with a consensus decision about preoperative APT based on a referral system among physicians, surgeons, and anesthesiologists. The risk of perioperative adverse events increased if complying with a consensus decision was failed.RegistrationURL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03908463.

Effects of individualized antiplatelet therapy, based on CYP2C19 genotyping, on platelet function in patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention.

To evaluate the effect of individualized antiplatelet therapy, based on CYP2C19 genotyping, on platelet function in patients underwent PCI and to compare this treatment with conventional antiplatelet therapy. All patients were treated with 100 mg aspirin once a day. Additionally, the CA group received 75 mg clopidogrel once a day. The IA group was divided into extensive metabolizers (EMs, no loss-of-function, i.e. LOF allele, 75 mg clopidogrel once a day), intermediate metabolizers (IMs, carrying one LOF alleles, 75 mg clopidogrel twice daily), and poor metabolizers group (PMs, carrying two LOF alleles, 90 mg ticagrelor twice daily). After taking these antiplatelet medications for ⩾5 days, we assessed platelet function by thromboelastography, and recorded the MAADP (maximum amplitude produced by adenosine diphosphate) value. MAADP > 47 mm was defined as residual HPR, indicating a high risk of thrombosis. MAADP ≤ 31 mm indicated a high risk of bleeding. The proportion of patients with MAADP > 47 mm was significantly lower in the IA group (29.6%) than the CA group (38.1%). The proportion of patients with MAADP ≤ 31 mm was significantly higher in the IA group (31.0%) than the CA group (21.3%). No significant differences were found in the proportions of patients with MAADP > 47 mm or MAADP ≤31 mm when compared between the EMs and IMs group. Individualized antiplatelet therapy, based on CYP2C19 genotyping, can reduce the incidence of HPR in ACS patients after PCI compared to conventional therapy. By taking a double dose of clopidogrel, patients with a CYP2C19 LOF allele can therefore overcome the reduced efficacy of clopidogrel associated with LOF alleles without increasing the risk of bleeding, which is of guiding significance for the management of antiplatelet therapy on ACS patients after PCI especially considering the CYP2C19 LOF alleles that carry an important predictor for the ischemic events. chiCTR-INC-17011550.

Non-cardiac surgery in patients with coronary artery disease: risk evaluation and periprocedural management.

Perioperative cardiovascular complications are important causes of morbidity and mortality associated with non-cardiac surgery, particularly in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Although preoperative cardiac risk assessment can facilitate the identification of vulnerable patients and implementation of adequate preventive measures, excessive evaluation might lead to undue resource utilization and surgical delay. Owing to conflicting data, there remains some uncertainty regarding the most beneficial perioperative strategy for patients with CAD. Antithrombotic agents are the cornerstone of secondary prevention of ischaemic events but substantially increase the risk of bleeding. Given that 5-25% of patients undergoing coronary stent implantation require non-cardiac surgery within 2 years, surgery is the most common reason for premature cessation of dual antiplatelet therapy. Perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy, which necessitates concomitant evaluation of the individual thrombotic and bleeding risks related to both clinical and procedural factors, poses a recurring dilemma in clinical practice. Current guidelines do not provide detailed recommendations on this topic, and the optimal approach in these patients is yet to be determined. This Review summarizes the current data guiding preoperative risk stratification as well as periprocedural management of patients with CAD undergoing non-cardiac surgery, including those treated with stents.

Perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy in noncardiac surgery.

Perioperative management of antiplatelet agents (APAs) in the setting of noncardiac surgery is a controversial topic of balancing bleeding versus thrombotic risks. Recent data do not support a clear association between continuation or discontinuation of APAs and rates of ischemic events, bleeding complications, and mortality up to 6 months after surgery. Clinical factors, such as indication and urgency of the operation, time since stent placement, invasiveness of the procedure, preoperative cardiac optimization, underlying functional status, as well as perioperative control of supply-demand mismatch and bleeding may be more responsible for adverse outcome than antiplatelet management. Perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy (APT) should be individually tailored based on consensus among the anesthesiologist, cardiologist, surgeon, and patient to minimize both ischemic/thrombotic and bleeding risks. Where possible, surgery should be delayed for a minimum of 1 month but ideally for 3-6 months from the index cardiac event. If bleeding risk is acceptable, dual APT (DAPT) should be continued perioperatively; otherwise P2Y12 inhibitor therapy should be discontinued for the minimum amount of time possible and aspirin monotherapy continued. If bleeding risk is prohibitive, both aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor therapy should be interrupted and bridging therapy may be considered in patients with high thrombotic risk.

Impact of perioperative aspirin continuation on bleeding complications in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis.

In laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) for patients who receive antiplatelet therapy (APT), it remains unclear whether APT should be continued or temporarily withdrawn. We investigated the safety of perioperative aspirin continuation, specifically focused on bleeding complications. We performed retrospective analysis utilizing propensity score-matching (PSM). In total, 789 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria, and were divided into two groups. Patients in the continued aspirin monotherapy (cAPT) group continued treatment perioperatively with not more than 2days of withdrawal (n = 140). Patients with more than 3days withdrawal of aspirin or who did not receive APT at all were assigned to the non-cAPT group (n = 649). After 1:1 PSM, 105 patients were extracted from each group. Perioperative APT management was determined based on our institutional committee-approved guidelines for antithrombotic management. In PSM cohorts, all patient demographics were comparable between the groups. Regarding intraoperative outcomes, we found no significant difference in operation duration (p = 0.969), blood loss (p = 0.068), and blood transfusion (p = 0.517). Postoperative overall morbidity was 20.0% and 13.3% in the cAPT and non-cAPT groups, respectively (p = 0.195). The incidence of bleeding complications was also comparable between the groups (2.9% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.317). Assessing the 14 cases with bleeding complications overall in the full cohort, all 7 cases in the non-cAPT group had anastomotic bleeding, which was generally observed shortly after surgery [median postoperative day (POD) 1]. All 7 cases in the cAPT group received additional antithrombotics other than aspirin; bleeding occurred at various sites relatively later (median POD 7), mostly after reinstitution of additional antithrombotic agents. For patients receiving APT, perioperative continuation of aspirin monotherapy could be safe in laparoscopic CRC surgery; however, careful consideration is required at reinstitution of additional antithrombotics where multiple antithrombotic agents are used.

Concomitant Aspirin and Anticoagulation Is Associated With Increased Risk for Major Bleeding in Surgical Patients Requiring Postoperative Intensive Care.

Critically ill surgical patients may receive concomitant aspirin and therapeutic anticoagulation postoperatively, yet the safety of this practice remains unknown. We evaluated the risk of major bleeding with concomitant therapy compared with anticoagulation alone. Observational cohort study. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to assess the association between concomitant therapy and a primary outcome of major bleeding. Postoperative ICUs at an academic medical center. Adults (≥ 18 yr old) receiving anticoagulation during postoperative ICU admission between 2007 and 2016. None. Nine thousand five hundred eighteen anticoagulated patients were included, including 3,237 (34%) receiving aspirin. A total of 1,874 unique patients (19.7%) experienced a major bleeding event. In inverse probability of treatment weighting analyses, concomitant therapy was associated with increased odds for major bleeding (odds ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.05-1.36; p = 0.006) compared with anticoagulation alone. An interaction test suggested a differential relationship between aspirin use and major bleeding based on aspirin use in the 7 days prior to anticoagulation, such that a strong association between aspirin and major bleeding was observed for recent initiators of aspirin (1.40; 1.13-1.72;p = 0.002) but not for those continuing prior aspirin use. Aspirin use prior to anticoagulation did not modify the relationship between concomitant therapy and new myocardial infarction or stroke (i.e., rates were not increased with aspirin discontinuation prior to anticoagulation). Concomitant aspirin and anticoagulation in critically ill surgical patients was associated with an increased rate of major bleeding. Future investigations are warranted to further define optimal management of antiplatelet therapy during anticoagulation in surgical patients.

Facilitation Through Aggrastat or Cangrelor Bolus and Infusion Over PrasugreL: a MUlticenter Randomized Open-label Trial in PatientS with ST-elevation Myocardial InFarction Referred for PrimAry PercutaneouS InTERvention (FABOLUS FASTER) Trial: Design and Rationale : The FABOLUS FASTER Trial.

Antithrombotic therapy is a critical component of the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Rapid and profound inhibition of platelet reactivity has been shown to mitigate the ischemic risks and improve myocardial salvage. High residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) has been reported up to 4 or 6h after loading dose of prasugrel or ticagrelor; therefore, multiple alternative strategies, including crushed or chewed oral tables or intravenous agents, have been investigated to provide a more rapid and sustained inhibition of platelet function and bridge the initial treatment gap. The FABOLUS FASTER is the first investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, prospective, randomized study to directly compare the pharmacodynamics effects of cangrelor, tirofiban, chewed or integer prasugrel. This study will add new insights in the management of antiplatelet therapy in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI and might be hypothesis-generating for future clinical trials in this field. The trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov NCT02978040, and EudraCT 2017-001065-24.