Management Of Alcohol Use Disorders Research Articles

Anxiolytic, memory improvement, hepatoprotective, and antioxidant effects of Thymus vulgaris on alcohol withdrawal syndrome in mice

Introduction: Thymus vulgaris is a plant used in Cameroon to alleviate and treat hangover symptoms. This study was conducted to assess the anxiolytic, memory-improving, hepatoprotective, and antioxidant effects of T. vulgaris on alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Methods: In this preclinical study 42 mice were grouped into seven equal sets of normal control, negative control, positive control (piracetam; 200 mg/kg), and test (T. vulgaris; 25, 50, 100, or 200 mg/kg) groups. All mice (except those of the normal control) were administered ethanol by gavage once daily for 28 days. After alcohol withdrawal, behavioral assessments (elevated plus maze, Y-maze, and open field) were performed from day 29 to day 31, one hour following appropriate treatments. Mice were euthanized on day 32 and the brains and the livers were used for histopathological assessment and oxidative stress parameters evaluation. Results: In the elevated plus maze test, T. vulgaris at 100 and 200 mg/kg significantly (P < 0.001) increased the number of entries and the time spent in the open arms. The plant extract (200 mg/kg) significantly (P < 0.001) increased the spontaneous alternation percentage in the Y maze. T. vulgaris administration decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) and nitric oxide (NO) in the brain and liver and increased glutathione (GSH) and catalase (CAT). The plant extract reduced the neuronal degeneration and hepatocyte damage induced by chronic alcohol administration. Conclusion: T. vulgaris had anxiolytic, memory-enhancing, and hepatoprotective properties against alcohol toxicity. These results may justify the use of thyme in traditional pharmacopeia in the management of alcohol use disorders (AUDs).

Preclinical Evaluation of Sodium Butyrate's Potential to Reduce Alcohol Consumption: A Dose-Escalation Study in C57BL/6J Mice in Antibiotic-Enhanced Binge-Like Drinking Model.

In our earlier efforts to establish gut-brain axis during alcohol use disorder (AUD), we have demonstrated that supplementation of C57BL/6J male mice with 8 mg/mL sodium butyrate, a major short-chain fatty acid, in drinking water reduced ethanol intake and neuroinflammatory response in antibiotic (ABX)-enhanced voluntary binge-like alcohol consumption model, drinking in the dark (DID). To further evaluate the preclinical potential of SB, we have set a dose-escalation study in C57BL/6J male mice to test effects of ad libitum 20 mg/mL SB and 50 mg/mL SB and their combinations with ABX in the DID procedure for 4 weeks. Effects of these SB concentrations on ethanol consumption and bodily parameters were determined for the duration of the treatments. At the end of study, blood, liver, and intestinal tissues were collected to study any potential adverse effects ad to measure blood ethanol concentrations. Increasing SB concentrations in the drinking water caused a loss in the protective effect against ethanol consumption and produced adverse effects on body and liver weights, reduced overall liquid intake. The hypothesis that these effects were due to aversion to SB smell/taste at these high concentrations were further tested in a follow up proof-of-concept study with intragastric gavage administration of SB. The higher gavage dose (320 mg/kg) caused reduction in ethanol consumption without any adverse effects. Overall, these findings added more support for the therapeutic potential of SB in management of AUD, given a proper form of administration.

Involvement of the gut microbiome-brain axis in alcohol use disorder.

The human intestine is colonized by a variety of microorganisms that influence the immune system, the metabolic response, and the nervous system, with consequences for brain function and behavior. Unbalance in this microbial ecosystem has been shown to be associated with psychiatric disorders, and altered gut microbiome composition related to bacteria, viruses, and fungi has been well established in patients with alcohol use disorder. This review describes the gut microbiome-brain communication pathways, including the ones related to the vagus nerve, the inflammatory cytokines, and the gut-derived metabolites. Finally, the potential benefits of microbiota-based therapies for the management of alcohol use disorder, such as probiotics, prebiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation, are also discussed.

Insights into ALD and AUD diagnosis and prognosis: Exploring AI and multimodal data streams.

The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence and the widespread embrace of digital technologies have ushered in a new era of clinical research and practice in hepatology. Although its potential is far from realization, these significant strides have generated new opportunities to address existing gaps in the delivery of care for patients with liver disease. In this review, we discuss how artificial intelligence and opportunities for multimodal data integration can improve the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of alcohol-associated liver disease. An emphasis is made on how these approaches will also benefit the detection and management of alcohol use disorder. Our discussion encompasses challenges and limitations, concluding with a glimpse into the promising future of these advancements.

Surreptitious Administration of Disulfiram Along with Its Implantation Leading toDisulfiram-associated Encephalopathy: A Case Report

Disulfiram is a US FDA–approved medication for the management of alcohol use disorder. However, compliance with disulfiram has been the Achilles’ heel of its efficacy. Implantation and surreptitious administration of disulfiram are two methods occasionally used to ensure disulfiram compliance. We present the case of a 45-year-old man who underwent disulfiram implantation. Upon consuming his first drink after this procedure, his wife administered him a hefty dose of disulfiram tablets surreptitiously. The patient subsequently developed a state of fluctuating orientation, marked impairment in attention and concentration, dyscalculia, along with memory and motor deficits. The diagnostic dilemma associated with such a presentation, along with the ethical violations and medical risks associated with implantation and surreptitious use, is discussed. Disulfiram-associated encephalopathy is a rare consequence of disulfiram use and was precipitated in this patient by the administration of disulfiram using the above methods.

Gut microbiome in alcohol use disorder: Implications for health outcomes and therapeutic strategies-a literature review.

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) represents a major public health issue which affects millions of people globally and consist a chronic relapsing condition associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. The gut microbiome plays a crucial role in maintaining overall health and has emerged as a significant contributor to the pathophysiology of various psychiatric disorders. Recent evidence suggests that the gut microbiome is intimately linked to the development and progression of AUD, with alcohol consumption directly impacting its composition and function. This review article aims to explore the intricate relationship between the gut microbiome and AUD, focusing on the implications for mental health outcomes and potential therapeutic strategies. We discuss the bidirectional communication between the gut microbiome and the brain, highlighting the role of microbiota-derived metabolites in neuroinflammation, neurotransmission, and mood regulation. Furthermore, we examine the influence of AUD-related factors, such as alcohol-induced gut dysbiosis and increased intestinal permeability, on mental health outcomes. Finally, we explore emerging therapeutic avenues targeting the gut microbiome in the management of AUD, including prebiotics, probiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation. Understanding the complex interplay between the gut microbiome and AUD holds promise for developing novel interventions that could improve mental health outcomes in individuals with AUD.

Psychedelic Therapy: A Primer for Primary Care Clinicians-Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD).

Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) is a hallucinogenic agent. In the mid-20th century, it was used to augment psychoanalysis and to treat alcohol use disorder. However, LSD was banned in 1970 in part because of concerns that it could bring about or exacerbate mental illness. Its therapeutic potential remains incompletely understood. While uncontrolled recreational use of LSD can, in rare instances, lead to long-term psychosis, adverse events in clinical trials of LSD, such as anxiety, headache, and nausea, have almost always been mild and transient. Serious adverse events, such as intense panic, suicidal ideation, and psychosis, were reported in either none or very few of the participants. However, patient selection criteria, optimal dosing strategy, and appropriate clinical follow-up guidelines remain to be established. Preliminary data suggest that LSD may be effective for the management of alcohol use disorder, anxiety, and depression. In trials of LSD for treating anxiety and depression associated with life-threatening illnesses, 77% of participants demonstrate durable relief at 1 year post-treatment. Top-line data from a large-scale phase IIb trial (n = 198) indicate that 50% of participants experience remission from generalized anxiety disorder after a single 100 μg dose of LSD. According to a meta-analysis of RCTs on LSD from the mid-20th century, single-dose regimens of LSD significantly improve alcohol use disorder (P < 0.0003) with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.96. Only one large-scale clinical trial (>50 participants) has been conducted on LSD in the contemporary era of psychedelic research. Further studies with large sample sizes are needed to explore potential clinical applications. Preliminary data suggest that LSD may be one of the most potent treatments for anxiety in patients both with and without a life-threatening illness. LSD may also be beneficial for treating depression and substance use disorders.

Ayurvedic Management of Alcohol Use Disorder - A Case Series

Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) is a medical condition characterized by impaired ability to stop or control alcohol use despite the adverse social, occupational, or health consequences which ranges from mild to severe. AUD includes symptoms of alcohol intoxication, withdrawal as well as dependence. Etiological perspective applies a bio psychosocial framework that emphasizes the interplay of genetics, neurobiology, psychology and individual’s societal context. Globally around 1.4% of the population have AUD and 3 million deaths result from harmful alcohol use each year. Contemporary management includes medical intervention, counselling, outpatient program, or a residential inpatient stay, but the relapse rate is high. Hence the medical world is focusing on indigenous medicine and its probable outcome in the management of AUD. Objectives: In Ayurveda, the context of Madatyaya refers to conditions resultant from improper and excessive usage of alcohol and even other substance use. Every patient is being examined thoroughly as per Ayurveda parameters and based on the observations as well as the severity; individualized protocols are being framed. The case series includes 4 cases of AUD which was managed with a protocol including withdrawal management with Nasya, Sirodhara as well as internal medicines. This was followed by Snehapana, Vamana or Virechana, therapeutic yoga, family counselling as well as administration of Rasayana so as to address the dependence. The treatment protocol was finalised as per the assessment of Doshas, based on the clinical presentation. The outcome was assessed with CIWA-Ar, AUDIT, and SADQ Questionnaire. Result: Such a protocol is capable of addressing the bio-psychosocial factors of AUD and was observed as effective. Symptomatic improvement was noticed after the treatment in all the four cases and there was improvement in scores of assessment. The result was promising as well.

Ayurvedic management of Alcohol Use Disorder

Substance use disorders are chronic relapsing disorders, leading to significant impairment in psychosocial functioning. Nicotine and alcohol are most widely consumed psychotropic drugs worldwide. The common use of both increases the risk of noncommunicable diseases to many folds. Conventional therapies have not been able to alter the outcome of these disorders significantly and frequent relapses continue to occur. Hence there is a need to look at complementary and alternate systems of medicine. Ayurveda remains one of the most ancient and yet living traditions practiced widely in India and has a sound philosophical and experiential basis. The planning of an effective adequate management of alcohol use disorder in Ayurveda with the aid of Ahara, Vihara, Achara and Aushadhi depends upon the strength of the disease (Roga) and the stamina of the patient (Rogi). Here is an attempt made to explain a case study of alcohol use disorder with holistic Ayurvedic management.

Canadian guideline for the clinical management of high-risk drinking and alcohol use disorder.

In Canada, low awareness of evidence-based interventions for the clinical management of alcohol use disorder exists among health care providers and people who could benefit from care. To address this gap, the Canadian Research Initiative in Substance Misuse convened a national committee to develop a guideline for the clinical management of high-risk drinking and alcohol use disorder. Development of this guideline followed the ADAPTE process, building upon the 2019 British Columbia provincial guideline for alcohol use disorder. A national guideline committee (consisting of 36 members with diverse expertise, including academics, clinicians, people with lived and living experiences of alcohol use, and people who self-identified as Indigenous or Métis) selected priority topics, reviewed evidence and reached consensus on the recommendations. We used the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation Instrument (AGREE II) and the Guidelines International Network's Principles for Disclosure of Interests and Management of Conflicts to ensure the guideline met international standards for transparency, high quality and methodological rigour. We rated the final recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool; the recommendations underwent external review by 13 national and international experts and stakeholders. The guideline includes 15 recommendations that cover screening, diagnosis, withdrawal management and ongoing treatment, including psychosocial treatment interventions, pharmacotherapies and community-based programs. The guideline committee identified a need to emphasize both underused interventions that may be beneficial and common prescribing and other practice patterns that are not evidence based and that may potentially worsen alcohol use outcomes. The guideline is intended to be a resource for physicians, policymakers and other clinical and nonclinical personnel, as well as individuals, families and communities affected by alcohol use. The recommendations seek to provide a framework for addressing a large burden of unmet treatment and care needs for alcohol use disorder within Canada in an evidence-based manner.

Management of alcohol use disorder in alcohol-associated liver disease for nonaddiction specialists

Management of alcohol use disorder in alcohol-associated liver disease for nonaddiction specialists

Management of alcohol use disorder in patients with chronic liver disease.

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) rates have risen dramatically in the United States, resulting in increasing rates of alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD), but many patients struggle to access alcohol use treatment. AUD treatment improves outcomes, including mortality, and represents the most urgent means by which care can be improved for those with liver disease (including ALD and others) and AUD. AUD care for those with liver disease involves 3 steps: detecting alcohol use, diagnosing AUD, and directing patients to alcohol treatment. Detecting alcohol use can involve questioning during the clinical interview, the use of standardized alcohol use surveys, and alcohol biomarkers. Identifying and diagnosing AUD are interview-based processes that should ideally be performed by a trained addiction professional, but nonaddiction clinicians can use surveys to determine the severity of hazardous drinking. Referral to formal AUD treatment should be made, especially where more severe AUD is suspected or identified. Therapeutic modalities are numerous and include different forms of one-on-one psychotherapy, such as motivational enhancement therapy or cognitive behavior therapy, group therapy, community mutual aid societies (such as Alcoholics Anonymous), inpatient addiction treatment, and relapse prevention medications. Finally, integrated care approaches that build strong relationships between addiction professionals and hepatologists or medical providers caring for those with liver disease are crucial to improving care for this population.

Non-pharmacotherapeutic Management of Alcohol Use Disorder in the Alaska Native Population: A Narrative Review.

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a leading preventable cause of death in the United States and has had a greater health impact on Alaska Natives than on any other racial group. To date, AUD in these communities has had wide-reaching negative impacts contributing to high rates of suicide, homicide, and accidents. A variety of genetic, experiential, social, and cultural factors have been associated with this trend. For decades, the Alaska Native subgroup has received inadequate treatment. The purpose of this review is to evaluate current trends in effective interventions and to help answer the question: What may comprise a successful non-pharmacotherapeutic interventional strategy to treat and prevent AUD in Alaska Natives?A database literature search was performed in September 2022 using the PubMed library. Search terms included (alcohol use disorder) AND ((Alaska OR Alaskan) Native). Inclusion criteria included full-text articles, a focus on specific non-pharmacotherapeutic treatment strategies, and a publication date after 2005. Studies that did not evaluate non-pharmacotherapeutic interventions, evaluated a population other than Alaska Natives, evaluated a disorder other than AUD,were written in a language other than English, or were editorials or opinion pieces were excluded. The selected studies were assessed for bias utilizing the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Twelve studies were included in this review. This review found that early social network intervention, incentive-driven programs, culturally-driven programs, and motivational interviewing are promising non-pharmacotherapeutic interventions in the treatment of AUD in Alaska Native communities. Evidence suggests that a shift in focus to the accentuation of protective factors and the mitigation of isolation as a risk factor, rather than on the reduction of more intractable risk factors, may be associated with improved outcomes in treating AUD. The literature also suggests that successful prevention strategies should be driven by indigenous knowledge and grounded in community and culture. This study has its limitations. These include a lack of direct comparisons between studies, a lack of pooled statistical analysis or synthesis, and a lack of quantitative analysis. Instead, the majority of data is gathered from more bias-prone cross-sectional studies and, thus, should be used to provide insight into potential risk factors and non-pharmacologic therapies effective in this population rather than as strong evidence in favor of one therapeutic regimen over another. For this, there is a need for more clinical trials evaluating treatments for AUD in this population.This review received support from the University of South Florida Department of Psychiatry. There were no sources of funding for this work from any institution. There are no competing financial or non-financial interests that may be interested in this work. This review is not registered. This review does not have a prepared protocol.

Culture, stigma, and inequities creating barriers in alcohol use disorder management in alcohol-associated liver disease.

Culture, stigma, and inequities creating barriers in alcohol use disorder management in alcohol-associated liver disease.

The management of alcohol use disorder in the emergency department, is it time for version 2.0?

The management of alcohol use disorder in the emergency department, is it time for version 2.0?

Naltrexone for alcohol use disorder: Hepatic safety in patients with and without liver disease.

Naltrexone is an approved drug for management of alcohol use disorder (AUD), but data in patients with liver disease (LD) are limited. We aimed to evaluate the safety of naltrexone in those with LD. This is a retrospective cohort of adults with and without LD who were prescribed naltrexone for AUD from 2015 to 2019 in a safety-net setting. Naltrexone hepatic safety was determined by liver enzyme changes during and after compared to before naltrexone prescription as well as rates of subsequent hospitalization and death by Kaplan-Meier methods. Factors associated with hospitalization were examined by Cox regression. Of 160 patients prescribed naltrexone for AUD, 100 (63%) had LD and 47 (47%) of those with LD had cirrhosis (47% decompensated). The total cohort, LD, and cirrhosis groups had lower adjusted mean aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels after versus before naltrexone prescription (p < 0.001). Two-year survival was 97.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.6-99.7), 95.4% (95% CI, 82.8-98.8), 90.8% (95% CI, 73.5-97.0), and 81.3% (95% CI, 41.2-93.8) in those without LD, LD without cirrhosis, cirrhosis, and decompensated cirrhosis groups (p=0.46), respectively. Alcohol-related 2-year hospitalization rates were 8.2% (95% CI, 2.7-24), 27.7% (95% CI, 16.6-44.0), 40.5% (95% CI, 24.8-61.6), and 41.7% (95% CI, 23.3-66.6) for the groups without LD, LD without cirrhosis, cirrhosis, and decompensated cirrhosis (p=0.007), respectively. Independent predictors of subsequent hospitalization were LD, (hazard ratio [HR], 3.70; 95% CI, 1.19-11.51; p=0.02), cirrhosis (HR, 5.16; 95% CI, 1.69-15.75), and shorter duration (≤30 days) of naltrexone prescription (HR, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.l2-5.20; p=0.01). Conclusion: Naltrexone is safe to use in patients with underlying LD, including those with compensated cirrhosis. Although encouraging, more safety data are needed for those with decompensated cirrhosis.

Simultaneous Management of Alcohol Use Disorder and Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Management of alcohol use disorder (AUD) is rarely used in patients with liver disease. We performed a systematic review to examine the impact of AUD management among patients with liver disease. Twenty studies fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria on 38,329 patients (7072 receiving AUD intervention) with liver disease (15 with liver disease and 6 liver transplant [LT] recipients) were analyzed. One study was common to both groups. Variable follow-up period across studies was weighted for sample size and converting to person-years. Primary outcome was alcohol use, and secondary outcomes were liver decompensation and patient mortality. Abstinence and alcohol relapse rates/person-year with AUD intervention among liver disease patients were 0.41 (0.27-0.55) and 0.42 (0.30-0.755), similar for integrated (colocated liver and addiction clinics) versus concomitant (separate hepatology and addiction clinics) intervention. Compared with standard of care, odds for decompensation with AUD intervention (n = 1), 30-day readmission (n = 1), and patient mortality (n = 2) were lower by 44%, 59%, and 58% respectively. Similar figures were 1.24 (0.86-1.80) for abstinence and 0.52 (0.24-0.14) for relapse. Among LT recipients, odds for alcohol relapse and mortality with follow-up integrated with addiction team versus hepatology alone were 0.48 (0.25-0.72) and 0.29 (0.08-0.99), respectively. Follow-up of LT recipients in an integrated clinic with addiction team is associated with improved outcomes. Simultaneous management of AUD in patients with liver disease improves liver-related outcomes. Large prospective studies are needed to examine benefits of AUD intervention in patients with liver disease.

Tailoring an evidence-based clinical intervention and training package for the treatment and prevention of comorbid heavy drinking and depression in middle-income country settings: the development of the SCALA toolkit in Latin America

ABSTRACT Background Effective interventions exist for heavy drinking and depression but to date there has been limited translation into routine practice in global health systems. This evidence-to-practice gap is particularly evident in low- and middle-income countries. The international SCALA project (Scale-up of Prevention and Management of Alcohol Use Disorders and Comorbid Depression in Latin America) sought to test the impact of multilevel implementation strategies on rates of primary health care-based measurement of alcohol consumption and identification of depression in Colombia, Mexico, and Peru. Objective To describe the process of development and cultural adaptation of the clinical intervention and training package. Methods We drew on Barrero and Castro’s four-stage cultural adaption model: 1) information gathering, 2) preliminary adaption, 3) preliminary adaption tests, and 4) adaption refinement. The Tailored Implementation in Chronic Diseases checklist helped us identify potential factors that could affect implementation, with local stakeholder groups established to support the tailoring process, as per the Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s Going to Scale Framework. Results In Stage 1, international best practice guidelines for preventing heavy drinking and depression, and intelligence on the local implementation context, were synthesised to provide an outline clinical intervention and training package. In Stage 2, feedback was gathered from local stakeholders and materials refined accordingly. These materials were piloted with local trainers in Stage 3, leading to further refinements including developing additional tools to support delivery in busy primary care settings. Stage 4 comprised further adaptions in response to real-world implementation, a period that coincided with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, including translating the intervention and training package for online delivery, and higher priority for depression screening in the clinical pathway. Conclusion Our experience highlights the importance of meaningful engagement with local communities, alongside the need for continuous tailoring and adaptation, and collaborative decision-making.

Missed opportunity for alcohol use disorder screening and management in primary health care facilities in northern rural Tanzania: a cross-sectional survey

ObjectiveThe study aimed to identify the missed opportunity for detection and management of alcohol use disorder by primary health care workers.DesignA cross-sectional surveySettingOutpatient services in the six governmental primary health care facilities in Moshi district council in Tanzania.ParticipantsA total of 1604 adults were screened for alcohol use disorder (AUD) using the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT). Participants scoring 8 or above then provided details about their help-seeking behavior and barriers to seeking care. Participants’ records were reviewed to assess the screening and management of AUD.ResultsIn the last 12 months, 60.7% reported alcohol use, and heavy episodic drinking (HED) was reported by 37.3%. AUD (AUDIT ≥ 8) was present in 23.9%. Males were more likely to have HED (aPR = 1.43;95% CI:1.3 to 1.4) or AUD (aPR = 2.9; 95% CI 1.9 to 4.2). Both HED and AUD increased with age. Only one participant (0.3%) had documented AUD screening and management. Only 5% of participants screening positive for AUD had sought help. Reasons for not seeking care were thinking that the problem would get better by itself (55.0%), wanting to handle the problem alone (42.0%), or not being bothered by the problem (40.0%).ConclusionWhile reported alcohol use, HED, and AUD are common among patients presenting to primary healthcare facilities in northern Tanzania, help-seeking behavior and detection are very low. Not screening for AUD in primary health care is a missed opportunity for early detection and management. There is an urgent need to develop interventions to increase the detection of AUD by health care providers, while also addressing help-seeking behavior and barriers to seeking care.

Multimodal multidisciplinary management of alcohol use disorder in liver transplant candidates and recipients.

Alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) is the most common indication for liver transplantation (LT) in the United States. The judicious allocation of organs and improvement in outcomes requires identification and monitoring of patients with ALD at high-risk for relapse post-transplantation. The controversial movement toward early LT for severe alcohol-related hepatitis (SAH) has also raised concern for alcohol relapse. While LT cures ALD, treatment of alcohol use disorder (AUD) must be included in the care plan to prevent a return to drinking and subsequent graft ALD. Patients with underlying AUD must be recognized, offered brief interventions and referred for multimodal multidisciplinary treatment that includes medications and psychotherapies along with sober support groups, family engagement, and a new dedication to healthy living in order to help sustain remission. Such comprehensive care will increase LT candidacy in patients with ALD while optimizing clinical outcomes of patients transplanted with AUD.