Management Of Acute Pancreatitis Research Articles

Aetiology, clinical profile, management and outcome of acute pancreatitis at public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a prospective observational study.

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a rare gastrointestinal pathology that has recently become increasingly common owing to lifestyle changes. Its clinical presentation ranges from mild discomfort to organ failure and death. Previous studies in Ethiopia reported that AP is rare. However, lifestyle changes have recently increased. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the aetiology, clinical profile, management, and outcomes of AP. This prospective observational study included 59 adults diagnosed with AP using the Revised Atlanta Classification between November 2021 and August 2022 at five public hospitals in Addis Ababa. The data were analyzed using SPSS 25. The mean ± standard deviation and adjusted odds ratio (AOR) at 95% CI were used. The mean age was 38.2 (SD±11.5years), mostly aged 30-44, with 67% males and 89.8% patients presenting with new-onset AP. Abdominal pain and nausea were the most common presentations in 93.2% of patients. More than 52.5% of AP cases were caused by alcohol, followed by gallstones (28.8%), and gallstones (47.1%) underwent cholecystectomy during the index admission. One patient (1.7%) died. The length of hospital stay ranges from 1-47 days and increases with the severity of AP. Patients with recurrent AP had a 2.4 folds increase in complications compared to new-onset AP (AOR=2.4, 95% CI=1.38, 15.71). Most AP cases were caused by alcohol consumption, followed by gallstones, smoking, and hypertriglyceridemia. One death in a 60-year-old male with an alcohol and smoking history was diagnosed and triaged as severe AP with persistent multiple organ failure; BISAP score 4, his Creatinine=2.55mg/dl, haematocrit 72.6%; and left shift of WBC, was associated.

Step-Up Management in Acute Pancreatitis: A Tertiary Care Center's Experience From Southern India.

Background The clinical spectrum of acute pancreatitis (AP) ranges from mild disease to severe form associated with multiorgan failure, prolonged hospital stay, high morbidity, and mortality. Acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) is a severe form of AP. This study evaluates AP's outcomes after applying principles of the step-upapproach in a tertiary healthcare center in south India. Methodology This prospective observational study was carried out from January 2021 to December 2022. The study population includes patients admitted to our department with AP. Results Ninetypatients were included in the study, most of them were middle-aged males with ethanol ingestion as the common etiology. Thirty-seven (41.1%) patients had mild AP, 25 (27.7%)had moderately severe AP, and 28 (31.1%)had severe AP. Organ failure at admission was noted in 36 (40%) patients. Twenty-three (25.5%) patients developed ANP. Infected necrosis was noted in 3 (3.33%) patients. Eighteen (20%) patients needed image-guided percutaneous drainage. Seven (38.8%) needed necrosectomy following percutaneous drainage. Mortality was observed in 8 (8.8%) patients. Specifically, mortality was noted in 6 (6.6%) patients who presented later in their disease course. Conclusions Percutaneous catheter drainage is a safe and effective therapy to tide over the initial phase of AP. It also serves as a bridging therapy till the patient is clinically fit for a necrosectomy. Severe AP cases presenting late in their course are associated with significant mortality even after step-upmanagement. Standardized protocols for referral and management are essential to obtain a good clinical outcome.

Acute pancreatitis: A narrative review.

Acute pancreatitis is a common cause of acute abdominal pain and can range from mild oedema to severe necrosis of the pancreas. It has a significant impact on morbidity, mortality and financial burden. The global prevalence of pancreatitis is substantial, with the highest rates observed in central and eastern Europe. Diagnosing acute pancreatitis involves considering clinical symptoms, elevated serum amylase and/or lipase levels, and characteristic imaging findings. The causes of acute pancreatitis include obstructive disorders, such as gallstones and biliary sludge, alcohol consumption, smoking, drug-induced pancreatitis, metabolic disorders, trauma, medical procedures, infections, vascular diseases and autoimmune pancreatitis. Appropriate management of acute pancreatitis involves determining the severity of the condition, providing supportive care, addressing the underlying cause, and preventing complications. Advances in classifying the severity of acute pancreatitis and implementing goal-directed therapy have contributed to a decrease in mortality rates. Understanding its prevalence, aetiology and management principles is crucial for clinicians to appropriately diagnose and manage patients with acute pancreatitis.

Pancreatic surgery and tertiary pancreatitis services warrant provision for support from a specialist diabetes team

Pancreatic surgery units undertake several complex operations, albeit with considerable morbidity and mortality, as is the case for the management of complicated acute pancreatitis or chronic pancreatitis. The centralisation of pancreatic surgery services, with the development of designated large-volume centres, has contributed to significantly improved outcomes. In this editorial, we discuss the complex associations between diabetes mellitus (DM) and pancreatic/periampullary disease in the context of pancreatic surgery and overall management of complex pancreatitis, highlighting the consequential needs and the indispensable role of specialist diabetes teams in support of tertiary pancreatic services. Type 3c pancreatogenic DM, refers to DM developing in the setting of exocrine pancreatic disease, and its identification and management can be challenging, while the glycaemic control of such patients may affect their course of treatment and outcome. Adequate preoperative diabetes assessment is warranted to aid identification of patients who are likely to need commencement or escalation of glucose lowering therapy in the postoperative period. The incidence of new onset diabetes after pancreatic resection is widely variable in the literature, and depends on the type and extent of pancreatic resection, as is the case with pancreatic parenchymal loss in the context of severe pancreatitis. Early involvement of a specialist diabetes team is essential to ensure a holistic management. In the current era, large volume pancreatic surgery services commonly abide by the principles of enhanced recovery after surgery, with inclusion of provisions for optimisation of the perioperative glycaemic control, to improve outcomes. While various guidelines are available to aid perioperative management of DM, auditing and quality improvement platforms have highlighted deficiencies in the perioperative management of diabetic patients and areas of required improvement. The need for perioperative support of diabetic patients by specialist diabetes teams is uniformly underlined, a fact that becomes clearly more prominent at all different stages in the setting of pancreatic surgery and the management of complex pancreatitis. Therefore, pancreatic surgery and tertiary pancreatitis services must be designed with a provision for support from specialist diabetes teams. With the ongoing accumulation of evidence, it would be reasonable to consider the design of specific guidelines for the glycaemic management of these patients.

Venous Thrombosis in Acute Pancreatitis: What to and Not to Do?

Acute pancreatitis is an acute inflammatory condition of the pancreas that has not only local but systemic effects as well. Venous thrombosis is one such complication which can give rise to thrombosis of the peripheral vasculature in the form of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and splanchnic vein thrombosis. The prevalence of these complications increases with the severity of the disease and adds to the adverse outcomes profile. With better imaging and awareness, more cases are being detected, although many at times it can be an incidental finding. However, it remains understudied and strangely, most of the guidelines on the management of acute pancreatitis are silent on this aspect. This review offers an overview of the incidence, pathophysiology, symptomatology, diagnostic work-up, and management of venous thrombosis that develops in AP.

Impact of nutritional support routes on mortality in acute pancreatitis: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Nutritional administration in acute pancreatitis (AP) management has sparked widespread discussion, yet contradictory mortality results across meta-analyses necessitate clarification. The optimal nutritional route in AP remains uncertain. Therefore, this study aimed to compare mortality among nutritional administration routes in patients with AP using consistency model. This study searched four major databases for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Two authors independently extracted and checked data and quality. Network meta-analysis was conducted for estimating risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) based on random-effects model. Subgroup analyses accounted for AP severity and nutrition support initiation. A meticulous search yielded 1185 references, with 30 records meeting inclusion criteria from 27 RCTs (n=1594). Pooled analyses showed the mortality risk reduction associated with nasogastric (NG) (RR=0.34; 95%CI: 0.16-0.73) and nasojejunal (NJ) feeding (RR=0.46; 95%CI: 0.25-0.84) in comparison to nil per os. Similarly, NG (RR=0.45; 95%CI: 0.24-0.83) and NJ (RR=0.60; 95%CI: 0.40-0.90) feeding also showed lower mortality risk than total parenteral nutrition. Subgroup analyses, stratified by severity, supported these findings. Notably, the timing of nutritional support initiation emerged as a significant factor, with NJ feeding demonstrating notable mortality reduction within 24 and 48h, particularly in severe cases. For severe AP, both NG and NJ feeding appear optimal, with variations in initiation timings. NG feeding does not appear to merit recommendation within the initial 24h, whereas NJ feeding is advisable within the corresponding timeframe following admission. These findings offer valuable insights for optimizing nutritional interventions in AP.

Enteral nutrition in the management of acute pancreatitis: Modulates gut microbiome and alleviates inflammation

BackgroundEnteral nutrition (EN) represents a fundamental and efficacious therapeutic approach in acute pancreatitis (AP). Our objective is to investigate the modulation of gut microbiota through enteral nutrition. MethodsThis prospective observational study enrolled 35 AP patients and implemented timely enteral nutrition intervention. Inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein (CRP), were assessed before and after EN, while the dynamic alterations in gut microbiota were analyzed using 16S rDNA sequencing technology. ResultsFollowing EN, CRP significantly decreased, effectively mitigating the inflammatory response. Due to inter-individual variations in post-enteral nutrition inflammatory status, patients were further stratified into H group (CRP≥50 mg/L) and L group (CRP<50 mg/L) for subsequent analysis. Comparative evaluation of clinical characteristics between the two groups revealed that the H group exhibited a significantly higher risk of adverse prognosis including respiratory dysfunction and infectious complications. Dynamic monitoring of gut microbiota demonstrated a substantial increase in microbial diversity after EN accompanied by a decrease in opportunistic pathogens such as Enterococcus, Escherella-Shigella, and Klebsiella, along with an augmentation of beneficial bacteria including Bacteroides and Fusobacterium. The composition of gut microbiota varied according to the levels of inflammation among AP patients: Shigella predominated within Group H, while Actinomyces and Enterococcus constituted the dominant bacterial population within Group L. Furthermore, Spearman correlation analysis revealed significant associations between specific microbial communities within the gut and inflammatory markers such as neutrophil to albumin ratio (NAR) and lymphocyte to C-reactive protein ratio (LCR). ConclusionsEN can modify gut microbiota and alleviate inflammation, thereby affecting the severity and prognosis of AP patients.

Continuing Medical Education Questions: March 2024

Article Title: American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines: Management of Acute Pancreatitis

Management of analgesia in acute pancreatitis: Results of a national survey

IntroductionAcute pancreatitis is one of the main reasons for digestive admissions. Adequate pain treatment is crucial in its management. However, there are hardly any descriptions of the analgesic guidelines used in our setting. MethodsOn-line survey on analgesic management in acute pancreatitis, aimed at attending physicians and residents practising in Spain. ResultsTwo hundred and nine physicians from 88 centres responded to the survey. Ninety percent were specialists in gastrointestinal medicine and 69% worked in a tertiary centre. The majority (64.4%) do not routinely use scales to measure pain. When choosing a drug, experience in its use was the most important factor. The most commonly prescribed initial treatments are: combination of paracetamol and metamizole (53.5%), paracetamol alone (19.1%) and metamizole alone (17.4%). As rescue: meperidine (54.8%), tramadol (17.8%), morphine chloride (17.8%) and metamizole (11.5%). Continuous perfusion is used in 8.2% of initial treatments. Physicians with >10 years of service use more metamizole as monotherapy (50%), while residents and attending physicians with <10 years of service prescribe it in combination with paracetamol (85%). If progression is needed, morphine chloride and meperidine are mainly used. The speciality of the respondent, the size of the work centre and the unit/service where the patients were admitted did not influence the analgesia prescribed. Satisfaction with pain management reached 7.8/10 (SD 0.98). ConclusionIn our setting, metamizole and paracetamol are the most commonly used analgesics as initial pain treatment in acute pancreatitis, and meperidine is the most commonly used rescue analgesic.

Management of acute pancreatitis in the emergency department and the intensive care unit

Acute pancreatitis is agastrointestinal emergency where diagnosis is based on typical symptoms, increased serum lipase concentration, and abdominal imaging. Local complications and organ failure in severe acute pancreatitis regularly necessitate treatment in the intensive care unit and are associated with increased mortality rates. Only optimal interdisciplinary treatment can improve the prognosis of patients with severe acute pancreatitis. This article gives guidance on the initial diagnostic and etiological examinations as well as on the evaluation of organ failure and the severity assessment according to common classification systems. Furthermore, the endoscopic management of biliary pancreatitis and infected necrosis is discussed and the basics of targeted volume therapy, nutrition, and indications for antibiotic treatment are reviewed.

Cysteine-modified PEGylated nanoparticles for targeted delivery of methylprednisolone to pancreatitis

The timely suppression of inflammatory mediator production and mitigation of their effects on pancreatic acinar cells are crucial for the successful management of acute pancreatitis. To achieve effective treatment, we present a novel approach utilizing cysteine modified PEG nanoparticles for both precise accumulation at the site of pancreatitis and specific targeting of acinar cells. Methylprednisolone, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, was tailored to enhance its circulation time in the bloodstream, preferentially accumulate in the pancreas and enhance cell uptake efficiency by acinar cells through specifically targeting L-Type amino acid transporter 1. The nanosystem significantly downregulated pro-inflammatory cytokines in plasma, resulting in the effective suppression of inflammation in acinar cells within an acute pancreatitis rat model. The utilization of the dual targeted therapy strategy holds considerable potential for the clinical management of pancreatitis.

Risk Factors and Management of Acute Pancreatitis; A Systematic Review

Pancreatitis, characterized by pancreatic inflammation, commonly stems from triggers such as gallstones and excessive alcohol consumption. Gene-environment interactions intricately contribute to disease onset and progression, challenging the traditional classification of acute, recurring, and chronic pancreatitis as distinct entities. Instead, a disease continuum has emerged, where 30% of acute pancreatitis cases progress into a chronic form, often involving episodes of recurrence. This systematic study aims to explore the Risk Factors and Management of Acute Pancreatitis. Data from PubMed/Medline, Scopus databases, and Embase were analyzed following PRISMA guidelines (2010–2023). Among 329 identified studies, 15 met inclusion criteria, primarily employing surveys and national database analyses. Enhanced comprehension of risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment is crucial for refining future evaluation and management strategies. Pancreatitis exhibits multifaceted characteristics, presenting diverse causes, symptoms, and outcomes. Current understanding of its natural history and treatment remains limited. Long-term follow-up and randomized studies are imperative to unravel gene-environment interactions and formulate innovative therapeutic approaches. The increased incidence has facilitated progress in defining pancreatitis, with identified risk factors including biliary issues, anatomical abnormalities, systemic diseases, medications, trauma, genetics, infections, and metabolic factors. Notably, the proportion of idiopathic cases has decreased due to improved recognition of genetic and anatomical variants. Effective acute pancreatitis management necessitates early and aggressive fluid and nutritional therapy, pain control, and addressing precipitating factors.

Opioid analgesia and severity of acute pancreatitis: An international multicentre cohort study on pain management in acute pancreatitis

Opioid analgesia and severity of acute pancreatitis: An international multicentre cohort study on pain management in acute pancreatitis

Etiological diagnosis of recurrent acute pancreatitis.

Acute pancreatitis is the leading cause of inpatient care among gastrointestinal conditions. Despite early intervention, one-third of patients experience recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP). A comprehensive diagnostic approach is warranted to identify and treat underlying factors in order to prevent recurrence. RAP is most frequent among men aged 30-40, smokers, and in those with excessive alcohol consumption. To identify the etiology is paramount to stratify patients according to their individual risk of RAP and for predicting an eventual evolution to chronic pancreatitis. Although the initial management of acute pancreatitis is widely homogeneous according to established guidelines, there are no defined protocols to investigate RAP. In the present editorial article we propose a structured algorithm with precise recommendations to investigate the etiology RAP as part of routine clinical practice. Although there are relevant knowledge gaps in this disease, we believe that our guidance would contribute for a more homogenous diagnostic approach of RAP in clinical practice.

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) of pancreatic necrosis is obsolete in the modern management of acute pancreatitis: insights from the PROCAP randomized trial

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) of pancreatic necrosis is obsolete in the modern management of acute pancreatitis: insights from the PROCAP randomized trial

Akut pankreatitli hastalarda akut pankreatik ve peripankreatik sıvı gelişiminde prediktif faktörler

Aims: Acute fluid collections after acute pancreatitis carries risk of serious complications as infected pseudocyst and Wall off Necrose development. Hence, it is important to predict the development of acute fluid collections for treatment and management of acute pancreatitis. In this study, it is aimed to investigate predictive factors for development of acute fluid collections in patients with acute pancreatitis. &#x0D; Methods: Total of 438 patients diagnosed with acute pancreatitis were screened. According to the Revised Atlanta Classification fluid development after acute pancreatitis was determined and the relationship between fluid development and the hematological/biochemical parameters of the patients at the time of admission was investigated. The best cut-off point of laboratory measurements for fluid development was determined by ROC analysis and the factors that may be most decisive in distinguishing between the patients with and without fluid development were determined by multivariate forward stepwise logistic regression analysis.&#x0D; Results: It is found that developing acute fluid collections after acute pancreatitis was higher in patients with younger age and male gender. Also the risk of developing acute fluid collections after acute pancreatitis was found to be 6.2 times higher in patients with CRP/Albumin ratio greater than 1.09; 2.5 times higher in patients with ALP below 199.5 U/L; 1.9 times higher in patients with WBC greater than 11,6 ×10⁹/L and 1.5 times higher in patients with PLR above 197.1. Also the risk of developing acute necrotic collections after acute pancreatitis was 3 times higher in patients with serum calcium level below 8,6 mg/dl.&#x0D; Conclusion: It has been determined that, presence of high CRP/albumin ratio, high NLR and low serum ALP level can be used as an indicator in predicting acute pancreatic and peripancreatic fluid development.

Instant duodenal decompression after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography can effectively reduce the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia.

Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is significantly influenced by the reflux of duodenal fluid. While gastrointestinal decompression represents a fundamental approach in acute pancreatitis management, the effectiveness of immediate duodenal decompression following ERCP to prevent PEP remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the impact of immediate duodenal decompression after ERCP on reducing the incidence of hyperamylasemia and PEP. This retrospective study encompassed patients with native papilla who underwent therapeutic ERCP for choledocholithiasis at the Department of Gastroenterology, Chun'an Branch of Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Zhejiang, China) between January 2020 and June 2023. Based on the immediate placement of a duodenal decompression tube post-ERCP, patients were categorized into two groups: the duodenal decompression group and the conventional procedure group. Primary outcomes included the incidence of PEP and hyperamylasemia. A total of 195 patients were enrolled (94 in the duodenal decompression group and 101 in the conventional procedure group). Baseline clinical and procedural characteristics exhibited no significant differences between the two groups. PEP occurred in 2 patients (2.1%) in the duodenal decompression group, in contrast to 11 patients (10.9%) in the conventional procedure group (Risk difference [RD] 8.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7%-16.5%, P = 0.014). Hyperamylasemia was observed in 8 patients (8.5%) in the duodenal decompression group, compared to 20 patients (19.8%) in the conventional procedure group (RD 11.3%; 95% CI 1.4%-21.0%; P = 0.025). Patients with PEP in both groups showed improvement after receiving active treatment. No severe cases of PEP occurred in either group, and no serious adverse events related to duodenal catheter decompression were reported. Immediate duodenal decompression following ERCP demonstrates an effective reduction in the incidence of hyperamylasemia and PEP.

A retrospective analysis of the clinical efficacy of pancreatic duct stent implantation in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis requiring ERCP

BackgroundThis study aimed to investigate the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of pancreatic duct stenting in managing acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) necessitating endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). It further aimed to provide valuable insights for subsequent clinical diagnosis and treatment.MethodsThis research employs an observational retrospective case–control study design, encompassing patients with ABP who underwent ERCP at the hepatobiliary surgery department of the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University between August 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020. A total of 229 cases were screened based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Regardless of ABP severity, patients were categorized into the stent group (141) and the non-stent group (88). Changes in blood amylase (Amy), lipase (LIP), leukocyte count (WBC), total bilirubin (TBIL), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), hematocrit (HCT), and creatinine (CR) were compared between the two groups. Moreover, variables such as recovery time for oral feeding, hospitalization duration, hospitalization costs, local complications, systemic complications, and new organ failure were recorded to assess the therapeutic effect of pancreatic duct stenting.ResultsNo significant differences were observed in gender, age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, ABP severity grade, organ failure (OF), cholangitis, or biliary obstruction between the pancreatic stent and non-stent groups (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications related to acute pancreatitis between the two groups (P > 0.05). The median fasting and hospitalization times of patients in the stent group were significantly shorter than those in the non-stent group (P < 0.05). No significant differences between the groups were observed in hospitalization costs and in-hospital mortality (P > 0.05). There were no significant variations in white blood cell (WBC) count, TBIL, ALT, and creatinine (Cr) at admission, 72 h, and in the differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). The levels of Amy at admission and 72 h in the stent group were significantly higher than those in the non-stent group (P < 0.05). The differences in LIP and HCT in the stent group were considerably higher than in the non-stent group (P < 0.05). Although no significant differences were observed in mean Amy and LIP between the two groups (P > 0.05), the mean 72-h HCT in the stent group was 38.39% (95% confidence interval [CI] 37.82%–38.96%) was lower than that in the non-stent group (39.44%, 95% CI 38.70–40.17%) (P < 0.05).ConclusionIn the stent group, feeding time and hospital stay were significantly shorter than those in the non-stent group. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the incidence of complications and mortality. The HCT value decreased more rapidly in the stent group. Early pancreatic stent implantation demonstrated the potential to shorten the eating and hospitalization duration of patients with ABP, facilitating their prompt recovery.Trial Registration: This study was registered as a single-center, retrospective case series (ChiCTR1800019734) at chictr.org.cn.

Contemporary management of acute pancreatitis: What you need to know.

Acute pancreatitis and management of its complications is a common consult for the acute care surgeon. With the ongoing development of both operative and endoscopic treatment modalities, management recommendations continue to evolve. We describe the current diagnostic and treatment guidelines for acute pancreatitis through the lens of acute care surgery. Topics, including optimal nutrition, timing of cholecystectomy in gallstone pancreatitis, and the management of peripancreatic fluid collections, are discussed. Although the management severe acute pancreatitis can include advanced interventional modalities including endoscopic, percutaneous, and surgical debridement, the initial management of acute pancreatitis includes fluid resuscitation, early enteral nutrition, and close monitoring with consideration of cross-sectional imaging and antibiotics in the setting of suspected superimposed infection. Several scoring systems including the Revised Atlanta Criteria, the Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis score, and the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade have been devised to classify and predict the development of the severe acute pancreatitis. In biliary pancreatitis, cholecystectomy prior to discharge is recommended in mild disease and within 8 weeks of necrotizing pancreatitis, while early peripancreatic fluid collections should be managed without intervention. Underlying infection or ongoing symptoms warrant delayed intervention with technique selection dependent on local expertise, anatomic location of the fluid collection, and the specific clinical scenario. Landmark trials have shifted therapy from maximally invasive necrosectomy to more minimally invasive step-up approaches. The acute care surgeon should maintain a skill set that includes these minimally invasive techniques to successfully manage these patients. Overall, the management of acute pancreatitis for the acute care surgeon requires a strong understanding of both the clinical decisions and the options for intervention should this be necessary.

An Actualization in Treating Acute Pancreatitis.

This overview delves into the comprehensive management of acute pancreatitis, covering procedures like percutaneous catheter drainage, necrosectomy, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and ultrasonography-guided endoscopic cyst gastrostomy. Tailoring interventions to specific patient needs is emphasized, with considerations for special populations such as pregnant individuals and children. The conclusion underscores the importance of judicious procedure selection and ongoing monitoring for optimal outcomes.