Managed Bee Species Research Articles

Distribution of infectious and parasitic agents among three sentinel bee species across European agricultural landscapes

Infectious and parasitic agents (IPAs) and their associated diseases are major environmental stressors that jeopardize bee health, both alone and in interaction with other stressors. Their impact on pollinator communities can be assessed by studying multiple sentinel bee species. Here, we analysed the field exposure of three sentinel managed bee species (Apis mellifera, Bombus terrestris and Osmia bicornis) to 11 IPAs (six RNA viruses, two bacteria, three microsporidia). The sentinel bees were deployed at 128 sites in eight European countries adjacent to either oilseed rape fields or apple orchards during crop bloom. Adult bees of each species were sampled before their placement and after crop bloom. The IPAs were detected and quantified using a harmonised, high-throughput and semi-automatized qPCR workflow. We describe differences among bee species in IPA profiles (richness, diversity, detection frequencies, loads and their change upon field exposure, and exposure risk), with no clear patterns related to the country or focal crop. Our results suggest that the most frequent IPAs in adult bees are more appropriate for assessing the bees’ IPA exposure risk. We also report positive correlations of IPA loads supporting the potential IPA transmission among sentinels, suggesting careful consideration should be taken when introducing managed pollinators in ecologically sensitive environments.

Disease associations between honeybees and bumblebees as a threat to wild pollinators

​Emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) pose a risk to human welfare, both directly and indirectly, by affecting managed livestock and wildlife that provide valuable resources and ecosystem services, such as the pollination of crops. Honeybees (Apis mellifera), the prevailing managed insect crop pollinator, suffer from a range of emerging and exotic high-impact pathogens, and population maintenance requires active management by beekeepers to control them. Wild pollinators such as bumblebees (Bombus spp.) are in global decline, one cause of which may be pathogen spillover from managed pollinators like honeybees or commercial colonies of bumblebees. Here we use a combination of infection experiments and landscape-scale field data to show that honeybee EIDs are indeed widespread infectious agents within the pollinator assemblage. The prevalence of deformed wing virus (DWV) and the exotic parasite Nosema ceranae in honeybees and bumblebees is linked; as honeybees have higher DWV prevalence, and sympatric bumblebees and honeybees are infected by the same DWV strains, Apis is the likely source of at least one major EID in wild pollinators. Lessons learned from vertebrates highlight the need for increased pathogen control in managed bee species to maintain wild pollinators, as declines in native pollinators may be caused by interspecies pathogen transmission originating from managed pollinators.Nature 506: 364–366 (19 February 2014)

Emerging threats and opportunities to managed bee species in European agricultural systems: a horizon scan

Managed bee species provide essential pollination services that contribute to food security worldwide. However, managed bees face a diverse array of threats and anticipating these, and potential opportunities to reduce risks, is essential for the sustainable management of pollination services. We conducted a horizon scanning exercise with 20 experts from across Europe to identify emerging threats and opportunities for managed bees in European agricultural systems. An initial 63 issues were identified, and this was shortlisted to 21 issues through the horizon scanning process. These ranged from local landscape-level management to geopolitical issues on a continental and global scale across seven broad themes—Pesticides & pollutants, Technology, Management practices, Predators & parasites, Environmental stressors, Crop modification, and Political & trade influences. While we conducted this horizon scan within a European context, the opportunities and threats identified will likely be relevant to other regions. A renewed research and policy focus, especially on the highest-ranking issues, is required to maximise the value of these opportunities and mitigate threats to maintain sustainable and healthy managed bee pollinators within agricultural systems.

Identity and diversity of pollens collected by two managed bee species while in blueberry fields for pollination.

The nutritional needs and foraging behavior of managed bees often lead to pollen collection from flowers other than the focal crop during crop pollination. To understand the pollen needs and preferences of managed bees during blueberry pollination, we identified pollen collected by Apis mellifera Linnaeus, 1758 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and Bombus impatiens Cresson, 1863 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) colonies across two years. Bumble bees collected a wider diversity of pollens compared to honey bees, whereas honey bees were more focused on abundant resources. Despite blueberries being the most abundant resource in the landscape, it was not the most collected pollen by either bee species in 2018. However, it was the most collected pollen by bumble bees in 2019 and they collected substantially more blueberry pollen than honey bees in both years. In 2018, buckthorn, Rhamnus L. (Rosales: Rhamnaceae) or Frangula Mill. (Rosales: Rhamnaceae), and willow, Salix L. (Malpighiales: Salicaceae), pollens were abundantly collected by both bee species. In 2019, cherry, Prunus L. (Rosales: Rosaceae), and willow (Salix) pollens were collected at high proportions by both species. Brambles, Rubus L. (Rosales: Rosaceae), and white clover, Trifolium repens L. (Fabales: Fabaceae), were also common pollen sources for honey bees, whereas oak, Quercus L. (Fagales: Fagaceae), was collected by bumble bees. Landscape analyses also revealed that certain land cover types were positively correlated with the collection of preferred pollen types. Herbaceous wetlands were associated with collection of buckthorn (Rhamnus/Frangula), willow (Salix), and cherry (Prunus) pollen, which were primary pollen resources for both bee species. There was no correlation between landscape diversity and pollen diversity, suggesting that colonies forage based on nutritional requirements rather than resource availability.

Artificial pollination of kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis Planch. var. chinensis) (Ericales: Actinidiaceae) results in greater fruit set compared to flowers pollinated by managed bees (Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and Bombus impatiens Cresson (Hymenoptera: Apidae)).

Due to a lack of knowledge on the pollination requirements of kiwifruit cultivars grown within the United States, farmers simultaneously implement multiple pollination methods, like the rental of managed bee species or artificial pollination to achieve high fruit yields. However, implementing multiple pollination methods is costly and possibly an inefficient use of resources. We assessed the contribution of two managed bees (Apis mellifera and Bombus impatiens) to the pollination of kiwifruit by i) determining the relative abundance of kiwifruit pollen collected by foragers of each bee species, and ii) comparing fruit set and fruit quality among insect and artificially pollinated flowers through an insect exclusion experiment. A significant difference was observed between the mean relative abundance of kiwifruit pollen carried in the corbicula of A. mellifera and B. impatiens, with B. impatiens carrying on average 46% more kiwifruit pollen than A. mellifera. Artificially pollinated kiwifruit flowers set significantly greater numbers of fruit per flower at four weeks post-bloom and at harvest compared to insect pollination, wind pollination, and pollen exclusion treatment. Artificial pollination produced fruits of greater weight, size, and seed number compared to insect-pollinated flowers, and few fruits were produced in the pollen exclusion and wind pollination treatments. Kiwifruit producers experiencing similar conditions to ours should focus on artificially pollinating their crops rather than relying on managed or wild insects for kiwifruit pollination. Future research should evaluate other methods of artificial pollination to determine their effectiveness, efficiency, and economics in the pollination of kiwifruit grown within the United States.

Shifting range in a stingless bee leads to pre-mating reproductive interference between species

Human-induced shifts in species’ ranges can increase contact between closely related species and lead to reproductive interference. In Australia, climate change and trade in stingless bee colonies is increasing the range overlap of two cryptic species: Tetragonula carbonaria and T. hockingsi. To investigate reproductive interactions between these species, we validated a diagnostic-PCR test based on the mitochondrial gene COI to ID field specimens to species. We then assessed the likelihood of reproductive interference in four ways. First, we imaged the male genitalia of each species and found no evidence of reproductive character displacement. Second, we assessed species composition of mating aggregations in an area of sympatry (Southeast Queensland) and confirmed that some males join the mating aggregations of interspecific colonies. Third, we translocated T. hockingsi colonies into the southern range of T. carbonaria (Sydney) and tracked their ability to requeen. These translocated colonies attracted mating aggregations comprised almost entirely of interspecific males, but never formed hybrid colonies; instead, queens either mated with their brothers, or the colony failed to requeen at all. Finally, we presented T. carbonaria males with either conspecific or interspecific virgin queens and found that males attempted to mate only with their own species’ queens. In all, we conclude that reproductive barriers between these species are complete with respect to “short-range” mating cues, but not for “long-range” mate attraction cues. Our study highlights that hive movements can increase some forms of pre-mating reproductive interference between managed bee species, even where the species do not actually mate or hybridize.

Effectiveness landscape of crop pollinator assemblages: Implications to pollination service management

There is a growing consensus that the world is facing a pollination crisis. To mitigate crop pollination deficits, some management strategies include the massive introduction of managed bee species, yet quite often they are applied blindly, as information on crop pollination effectiveness for each single pollinator species of assemblages is usually not available. Therefore, the introduction on managed species is not always the best option to improve crop yields. Here, by using the highly pollinator-dependent alfalfa crop (Medicago sativa L.) as a case study, we propose the use of the effectiveness landscape framework to identify key crop pollinator species. According to this framework, in a mutualistic interaction, each species´ effectiveness is represented by the product of a quantitative component and a qualitative one, these being measures of the outcomes of this interaction. We applied this framework for two managed and four wild bee species that visit alfalfa in fields southwest of Buenos Aires province, Argentina. We dissected the quantity components of the pollinator effectiveness landscape by estimating two quantitative subcomponents: visitation rate and flower tripping rate. Also, we estimate pod set as a qualitative component without dissecting it in subcomponents. Our results showed that the contribution of both components and the resulting pollinator effectiveness varied among pollinator species, indicating a contrasting effectiveness of different bee species on alfalfa pollination. For example, pollinator effectiveness was higher for managed than for wild bees, as consequence of their very high visitation rate, however, wild bee flower tripping rate and pod set were as high as managed ones. In fact, wild bees were more effective in promoting flower tripping than one of the managed bees (A. mellifera). This approach allowed us to assess which effectiveness components and subcomponents make pollinator species more or less effective, thus providing valuable information to identify key species to be enhanced to help in closing yield gaps. We suggest that the application of the effectiveness landscape framework would be useful to develop strategies to improve crop pollination service in pollinator-dependent crop systems.

Sunflower pollen reduces a gut pathogen in the model bee species, Bombus impatiens, but has weaker effects in three wild congeners.

Commercial bumblebees have become popular models to understand stressors and solutions for pollinator health, but few studies test whether results translate to other pollinators. Consuming sunflower pollen dramatically reduces infection by the gut parasite Crithidia bombi in commercially reared Bombus impatiens. We assessed the effect of sunflower pollen on infection in wild B. impatiens, Bombus griseocollis, Bombus bimaculatus and Bombus vagans. We also asked how pollen diet (50% sunflower pollen versus wildflower pollen) and infection (yes/no) affected performance in wild B. impatiens microcolonies. Compared to controls, sunflower pollen dramatically reduced Crithidia infection in commercial and wild B. impatiens, had similar but less dramatic effects in B. bimaculatus and B. vagans, and no effect in B. griseocollis. Bombus impatiens, B. bimaculatus and B. vagans are in the same subgenus, suggesting that responses to sunflower pollen may be phylogenetically conserved. In microcolonies, 50% sunflower pollen reduced infection compared to wildflower pollen, but also reduced reproduction. Sunflower pollen could control Crithidia infections in B. impatiens and potentially close relatives, but may hinder reproduction if other resources are scarce. We caution that research using managed bee species, such as B. impatiens, be interpreted carefully as findings may not relate to all bee species.

Managed and wild bees contribute to alfalfa (Medicago sativa) pollination

Biotic pollination is an essential ecosystem service for agricultural production and is reflected in the high number of crops that depend on insect pollination in order to produce profitable yields. Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) is a crop whose flowers need to be visited by a bee to be pollinated for seed production, making it highly pollinator-dependent. Two managed bee species are currently used to pollinate this crop: the alfalfa leafcutting bee (ALCB), one of the most efficient alfalfa pollinators, and the honey bee (HB), whose efficiencies could be highly variable among production sites. Besides, there are many other wild bee species (WBs) that are effective pollinators of alfalfa, but little attention has been placed on them, especially in Argentina, where alfalfa seed production is deficient. Here, we evaluate the contribution of both managed species and WBs on alfalfa pollination services in one of the most important alfalfa seed productive regions of Argentina. During the span of two years, we calculated pollen limitation in different pollinator managed scenarios: with and without ALCBs (ALCB+ and ALCB−, respectively), and we also evaluated the relationship between pollen limitation and all bee species visitation rates. Our results show that the ALCB is a very effective pollinator of alfalfa, since ALCB+ lots have less pollen limitation (32%) compared to ALCB− lots. In contrast, HBs seem to have a detrimental effect in pollination service in ALCB+ lots and a positive effect in ALCB− lots. This differential effect could be due to differences in foraging behavior caused by competition between HBs and ALCBs. Finally, in spite of their low abundances, we found that an increase in WB visitation rates substantially reduces pollen limitation. In spite of ALCBs being a good alfalfa pollinators, the difficulty and cost of managing them hinder its widespread use. The use of WBs seems to be a good alternative, and practices that improve their abundance and diversity should be implemented to improve alfalfa pollination service.

Local ecological knowledge of beekeeping with stingless bees (Apidae: Meliponini) in Central Veracruz, Mexico

Beekeeping with stingless bees (Apidae: Meliponini), an ancient activity in Mesoamerica, is still practiced and considered culturally important in many areas. It is part of a rich legacy of biocultural diversity, as it represents cultural expressions that have developed over time as a result of the interaction with the natural world. In this study we present the local ecological knowledge (LEK) associated with traditional stingless beekeeping in Atzalan, Veracruz, Mexico. We identified the diversity of managed bee species, LEK in terms of food resources for bees, types of bee management practices, as well as how this knowledge is transmitted and transformed. We also analyzed the terminology locally used for the practice, its uses, as well as perceptions of how beekeeping is changing in light of land use change. We found that in Atzalan, stingless beekeeping is common among its inhabitants, and it is associated with a strong LEK over its ecology, practice, and associated uses of bee products. Unlike other regions in Mexico where stingless beekeeping is diminishing, in Atzalan it is flourishing, driven by a market demand. However, land use changes and agricultural intensification in the area may threaten its long-term viability. We consider that this practice should be accompanied by integrated landscape planning for sustainable landscapes, where enrichment planting and maintenance of agroforestry systems can enhance resources for bee production. In these terms, conservation of the biocultural diversity associated with stingless bee management can be key to bee diversity and its associated flora, while considering livelihood strategies.

Possible Spillover of Pathogens between Bee Communities Foraging on the Same Floral Resource.

Simple SummaryFloral resource availability is one of the keys to preserving the health of bee communities. However, flowers also present a risk of pathogen transmission, as infected pollinators could deposit pathogens while foraging, exposing other pollinators to infection via the consumption of contaminated nectar or pollen. Here, we studied, over time, the prevalence of seven viruses in bee communities that share the same small surface of floral resource in order to assess the risk of virus spillover. In total, 2057 bee specimens from 30 species were caught, identified and checked for the presence of viruses. Specimens from the Halictidae family were the dominant wild bees. The prevalence of viruses was quite high: at least one virus was detected in 78% of the samples, and co-infections were frequent. The genetic diversity of the viruses was also investigated to look for the possible association of geographic origin or host with shared ancestry.Viruses are known to contribute to bee population decline. Possible spillover is suspected from the co-occurrence of viruses in wild bees and honey bees. In order to study the risk of virus transmission between wild and managed bee species sharing the same floral resource, we tried to maximize the possible cross-infections using Phacelia tanacetifolia, which is highly attractive to honey bees and a broad range of wild bee species. Virus prevalence was compared over two years in Southern France. A total of 1137 wild bees from 29 wild bee species (based on COI barcoding) and 920 honey bees (Apis mellifera) were checked for the seven most common honey bee RNA viruses. Halictid bees were the most abundant. Co-infections were frequent, and Sacbrood virus (SBV), Black queen cell virus (BQCV), Acute bee paralysis virus (ABPV) and Israeli acute paralysis virus (IAPV) were widespread in the hymenopteran pollinator community. Conversely, Deformed wing virus (DWV) was detected at low levels in wild bees, whereas it was highly prevalent in honey bees (78.3% of the samples). Both wild bee and honey bee virus isolates were sequenced to look for possible host-specificity or geographical structuring. ABPV phylogeny suggested a specific cluster for Eucera bees, while isolates of DWV from bumble bees (Bombus spp.) clustered together with honey bee isolates, suggesting a possible spillover.

Diverse Diets with Consistent Core Microbiome in Wild Bee Pollen Provisions

Bees collect pollen from flowers for their offspring, and by doing so contribute critical pollination services for our crops and ecosystems. Unlike many managed bee species, wild bees are thought to obtain much of their microbiome from the environment. However, we know surprisingly little about what plant species bees visit and the microbes associated with the collected pollen. Here, we addressed the hypothesis that the pollen and microbial components of bee diets would change across the range of the bee, by amplicon sequencing pollen provisions of a widespread small carpenter bee, Ceratina calcarata, across three populations. Ceratina calcarata was found to use a diversity of floral resources across its range, but the bacterial genera associated with pollen provisions were very consistent. Acinetobacter, Erwinia, Lactobacillus, Sodalis, Sphingomonas and Wolbachia were among the top ten bacterial genera across all sites. Ceratina calcarata uses both raspberry (Rubus) and sumac (Rhus) stems as nesting substrates, however nests within these plants showed no preference for host plant pollen. Significant correlations in plant and bacterial co-occurrence differed between sites, indicating that many of the most common bacterial genera have either regional or transitory floral associations. This range-wide study suggests microbes present in brood provisions are conserved within a bee species, rather than mediated by climate or pollen composition. Moving forward, this has important implications for how these core bacteria affect larval health and whether these functions vary across space and diet. These data increase our understanding of how pollinators interact with and adjust to their changing environment.

The leafcutter bee, Megachile rotundata, is more sensitive to N-cyanoamidine neonicotinoid and butenolide insecticides than other managed bees.

Recent research has shown that several managed bee species have specific P450 enzymes that are preadapted to confer intrinsic tolerance to some insecticides including certain neonicotinoids. However, the universality of this finding across managed bee pollinators is unclear. Here we show that the alfalfa leafcutter bee, Megachile rotundata, lacks such P450 enzymes and is >2,500-fold more sensitive to the neonicotinoid thiacloprid and 170-fold more sensitive to the butenolide insecticide flupyradifurone than other managed bee pollinators. These findings have important implications for the safe use of insecticides in crops where M. rotundata is used for pollination, and ensuring that regulatory pesticide risk assessment frameworks are protective of this species.

Variation in pollinator potential to carry a blueberry fungal pathogen and assessment of transfer efficiency in two managed bee species

Plant diseases are ubiquitous in agricultural systems and are major sources of economic loss. Vaccinium corymbosum, or highbush blueberry, is an economically important crop affected by an insect-vectored, fungal pathogen, Monilinia vaccinii-corymbosi, or mummy berry disease. Highbush blueberry yield is maximized through outcrossed pollination; however, the pathogen is vectored by pollinators. We used field collections and molecular techniques to identify floral visitors to highbush blueberry and quantify levels of pathogen spores carried by each visiting species. We also conducted a cage trial using single flower visits to determine differences in vectoring efficiency between two managed pollinators, Apis mellifera and Bombus impatiens. We found that bees, flies, and wasps were all common visitors, and that all bee species and several fly and wasp species carried the pathogen. Of the bee species, A. mellifera most often tested positive for the pathogen, while Dolichovespula maculata (Bald-faced Hornet) tested positive most among wasps and Mallota posticata among flies. Considering only individuals that tested positive, mummyberry levels per individual were highest in D. maculata and Andrena bees, and relatively low in flies. In cage trials, we found no differences between A. mellifera and B. impatiens in pathogen load or transfer efficiency, suggesting that these managed species are equally capable of vectoring mummyberry during a single visit to a blighted stem and then a flower. This research demonstrates the variety of floral visitors that carry mummyberry and that two common commercial pollinator species have similar potential to vector mummyberry to blueberry flowers during a single visit.

Double-stranded RNA reduces growth rates of the gut parasite Crithidia mellificae.

Parasites of managed bees can disrupt the colony success of the host, but also influence local bee-parasite dynamics, which is regarded as a threat for wild bees. Therapeutic measures have been suggested to improve the health of managed bees, for instance, exploiting the bees' RNA interference (RNAi) pathway to treat against viral pathogens. Gut trypanosomes are an important group of bee parasites in at least two common managed bee species, i.e., managed Apis mellifera and reared Bombus terrestris. In several trypanosomes, RNAi activity is present, while in other associated genes of RNAi, such as Dicer-like (DCL) and Argonaute (AGO), it is lost. Up to date, the ability to exploit the RNAi of gut trypanosomes of bees has remained unexplored. Here, we screened parasite genomes of two honey bee protozoa (Crithidia mellificae and Lotmaria passim) and two bumble bee protozoa (Crithidia bombi and Crithidia expoeki) for the presence of DCL and AGO proteins. For C. mellificae, we constructed a double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) targeting kinetoplastid membrane protein-11 (KMP-11) to test the RNAi potential to kill this parasite. Transfection with KMP-11 dsRNA, but also adding it to the growth medium resulted in small growth reduction of the trypanosome C. mellificae, thereby showing the limited potential to apply dsRNA therapeutics to control trypanosome infection in managed honey bee species. Within bumble bees, there seems to be no application potentials against C. bombi, as we could only retrieve non-functional DCL- and AGO-related genes within the genome of this bumble bee parasite.

A Review of Native Wild Bee Nutritional Health

Declines in wild and managed bee species richness and abundances have been observed throughout Europe and North America in recent decades. These declines have led to questions regarding pollination of wild and cultivated plants. In response to these concerns, efforts towards the conservation of pollinators have been initiated. Part of this conservation effort should be to provide the basic nutritional needs for bees. Nutrition plays one of the most important roles in bee growth, development, and reproduction. There is a large body of information regarding honey bee nutrition, whereas we lack nutritional information on native wild bees. Our knowledge of bumble bee nutritional needs has increased since the introduction of commercial rearing and sale of certain bumble bee species; however, there is still a lack of basic nutritional guidelines such as minimum dietary needs of proteins, amino acids, lipids, and sterols. The large difference in physiology and life history between honey bees and North American wild bees suggests that their nutritional requirements could be quite different.

Simulation models to predict pollination success in apple orchards: a useful tool to test management practices

The cultivated area of pollinator-dependent crops is increasing globally, and thus many natural habitats are being replaced by cropland. This change in land use is one of the main causes of biodiversity losses, of which include wild pollinators. As a consequence, many bee species are increasingly being reared and sold specifically for crop pollination services. However, the spatial arrangement of colonies of managed bee species in crops, as well as the spatial design of plants within plantations to maximize pollen flows is not standardized and growers are still experimenting. Here, we propose a spatially explicit simulation model to test which spatial arrangement of hives and plants maximizes pollination services. We used apple orchards pollinated by honey bees as a case study. We found that the spatial arrangement of plants within plantations affects both the mean level and homogeneity of the pollination in apple orchards. Bees’ hive locations, on the other hand, only affected the mean levels of pollination. Our results showed that simulation models are powerful tools to provide management recommendations to farmers.

Bacterial pathogens of bees.

Pollination is an indispensable ecosystem service provided by many insects, especially by wild and managed bee species. Hence, reports on large scale honey bee colony losses and on population declines of many wild bees were alarming and resulted in increased awareness of the importance of bee health and increased interest in bee pathogens. To serve this interest, this review will give a comprehensive overview on bacterial bee pathogens by covering not only the famous pathogens (Paenibacillus larvae, Melissococcus plutonius), but also the orphan pathogens which have largely been neglected by the scientific community so far (spiroplasmas) and the pathogens which were only recently discovered as being pathogenic to bees (Serratia marcescens, Lysinibacillus sphaericus).

Pollen Foraging Differences Among Three Managed Pollinators in the Highbush Blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum) Agroecosystem.

Highbush blueberry, Vaccinium corymbosum (Gray), production in British Columbia is dependent upon insect pollination for fruit yield with particular cultivars demonstrating low yields due to poor pollination. New managed species of pollinators are being developed to provide farmers with managed pollinator options beyond Apis mellifera (Linnaeus). Pollinators in highbush blueberry agricultural systems encounter a variety of nontarget floral resources that may affect the pollination received by the crop. Our study analyzed the differences in pollen foraging of honey bees and two species of managed bumblebees across nine farm sites. Corbicular pollen loads from pollen foraging workers were removed and identified to the lowest taxonomic level possible. Of the three managed pollinators, the corbicular pollen loads of Bombus huntii (Greene) contained the most blueberry pollen (52.1%), three times as much as the two other managed bee species. Fifteen morphotypes of pollen were identified from all foraging workers with Rosaceae being the most frequently gathered overall pollen type (n = 74). The noncrop pollen identified in our samples derived from plant species not common as weedy species in the agroecosystem suggesting that floral resource diversity outside of the farm boundaries is important to pollinators. The three managed species in our blueberry fields utilized floral resources differentially underscoring the importance of pollinator species' characteristics and large-scale floral resource landscape in developing new managed pollinators and pollination strategies.

Pollen preferences among the bee species visiting apple (Malus pumila) in New York

Maintaining a diverse and abundant wild bee community is essential for sustainable agricultural pollination, especially in crops in which wild bees are effective pollinators. Many land managers have an economic interest in encouraging healthy wild bee populations, but it is not always clear how to accomplish this. In apple orchards, wild bees play a critical role as pollinators, but are active before most forbs begin to flower. To investigate which flowering plant species might serve as alternative pollen hosts for the most abundant wild bee species collected in eastern apple orchards, we analyzed the pollen carried by 15 wild bee species and 1 managed bee species (Apis mellifera) collected during apple bloom. We identified the pollen grains carried by these bees and found that the majority of alternative pollen hosts for apple visitors are early blooming tree species, including six other tree genera. This may partly explain why the presence of forest fragments is an important predictor of bee abundance and species richness in New York apple orchards.