Malignant Hilar Biliary Strictures Research Articles

Endoscopic Transpapillary Stenting for Malignant Hilar Biliary Stricture: Side-by-Side Placement versus Partial Stent-in-Stent Placement.

Endoscopic uncovered metal stent (UMS) placement has been widely performed for unresectable hilar malignant biliary stricture (UHMBS). Two stenting methods are used for the two bile duct branches: side-by-side placement (SBS) and partial stent-in-stent placement (PSIS). However, it remains controversial whether SBS or PSIS is superior. This study aimed to compare SBS and PSIS in UHMBS cases with UMS placement in two branches of the IHD. This retrospective study included 89 cases of UHMBS treated with UMS placement through the SBS or PSIS technique using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography at our institution. Patients were divided into two groups, SBS (n = 64) and PSIS (n = 25), and compared. Clinical success was achieved in 79.7% and 80.0% in the SBS and PSIS groups, respectively (p = 0.97). The adverse event rate was 20.3% and 12.0% in the SBS and PSIS groups, respectively (p = 0.36). The recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) rate was 32.8% and 28.0% in the SBS and PSIS groups, respectively (p = 0.66). The median cumulative time to RBO was 224 and 178 days in the SBS and PSIS groups, respectively (p = 0.52). The median procedure time was 43 and 62 min in the SBS and PSIS groups, respectively, which was significantly longer in the PSIS group (p = 0.014). No significant differences were noted in the clinical success rate, adverse event rate, time to RBO, or overall survival between the SBS and PSIS groups, other than the significantly longer procedure time in the PSIS group.

Results of endoscopic biliary drainage in patients with malignant hilar stricture

In Malignant Hilar Biliary Stricture (MHBS) palliative biliary drainage is a frequent strategy, improving the quality of life, reducing pruritus, loss of appetite and relieving cholangitis. The endoscopic approach is an effective, although challenging procedure. This study aimed to evaluate technical and clinical success rates of biliary drainage by ERCP. This is a retrospective study including all patients with MHBS referred to Instituto do Cancer do Hospital de São Paulo (ICESP) submitted to biliary drainage by ERCP, between January 2010 and December 2017. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate predictors of clinical failure, as total bilirubin levels, Bismuth classification, number of hepatic sectors drained and presence of cholangitis. In total, 82 patients presenting unresectable MHBS were included in this study. 58.5% female and 41.5% male, with a mean age of 60±13 years. Bismuth classification grades II, IIIA, IIIB and IV were noted in 23.2%, 15.9%, 14.6% and 46.3%, respectively. Technical and clinical success was achieved in 92.7% and 53.7% respectively. At multivariable logistic-regression analyses, Bismuth IV strictures were related to higher clinical failure rates when compared to other strictures levels, with an Odds Ratio of 5.8 (95% CI 1.28‒20.88). In conclusion, endoscopic biliary drainage for malignant hilar biliary stricture had a high technical success but suboptimal clinical success rate. Proximal strictures (Bismuth IV) were associated with poor drainage outcomes.

A novel controllable catheter with a short flexible tip for guidewire insertion in severe malignant hilar biliary stricture.

A novel controllable catheter with a short flexible tip for guidewire insertion in severe malignant hilar biliary stricture.

Outcome of primary ERCP versus primary PTC for biliary drainage in malignant hilar biliary strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Patients with malignant hilar biliary strictures can suffer from obstructive jaundice. Controversy remains on the optimal approach to obtain preoperative or palliative biliary drainage in these patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to compare the two modalities most commonly used in this scenario: endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC). MEDLINE via PubMed was searched for relevant articles published from 2005 to April 2019. Following outcome measures were used to compare ERCP and PTC: therapeutic success rate, cholangitis, pancreatitis, bleeding,tube dislocation, reintervention rate, mortality such as 30d mortality and in-hospital death, median survival time, drainage patency, duration until decompression and hospital stay. Risk of bias assessment for the retrospective studies was conducted by NOS. RoB 2 was used for RCT. A meta-analysis was performed by using Review Manager 5.3. The certainty of evidence was appraised using GRADE. Eleven articles of which one RCT and ten retrospective cohort studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria for data-analysis (1417 patients; 784 ERCP, 633 PTC). The combined odds ratio (OR) for therapeutic succes was 3.5 times higher in the PTC group (95% CI 2.05-5.97; high certainty). In terms of cholangitis, ERCP carried a 1.7-fold risk as compared to PTC (95% CI 0.92-3.08; moderate certainty). Patients who underwent ERCP were 11.50 times more likely to undergo a reintervention (95% CI 3.51-37.70; moderate certainty). ERCP was comparable to PTC in terms of pancreatitis (low certainty), bleeding (high certainty) and tube dislocation rate (moderate certainty). Mortality tended to be numerically higher in the PTC group but low patient numbers, selection bias and study heterogeneity did not allow uniform comparative analysis. In patients with malignant hilar biliary strictures, PTC is associated with a better therapeutic success rate, less cholangitis and lower reintervention rate as compared to ERCP.

Successful endoscopic three-branch self-expandable metallic stent placement using a novel device delivery system for malignant hilar biliary stricture.

Successful endoscopic three-branch self-expandable metallic stent placement using a novel device delivery system for malignant hilar biliary stricture.

Unilateral versus bilateral Y-type stent-in-stent metal stent insertions in inoperable malignant hilar biliary strictures: A multicenter retrospective study

BackgroundTo date, there is controversy regarding unilateral versus bilateral stent placement in patients with malignant hilar biliary strictures (MHBSs). The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and complications of unilateral and bilateral (stent-in-stent method) stent placements for these patients. MethodsWe conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with inoperable MHBS who underwent endoscopic self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement from January 2009 to December 2019. Two groups classified according to the stent procedure method were compared for demographic, procedural, and postprocedure factors. Survival analysis for patency loss and overall survival was also conducted. ResultsA total of 236 subjects were included. A superior technical success rate was found in the unilateral stent group (98.8% vs. 82.5%, P < 0.001), whereas the clinical success rate was higher in the bilateral group (85.7% vs. 70.5%, P = 0.028). There was no significant difference with respect to complications or patency loss, and the bilateral group had better overall survival (P < 0.01). In the Cox proportional hazard model, MHBSs from lymph node compression were associated with a higher risk of death (HR = 9.803, P = 0.003). In contrast, bilateral SEMS insertion showed reduced postprocedural mortality (HR = 0.316, P = 0.001). ConclusionsY-type stent-in-stent bilateral SEMSs are technically difficult but demonstrated more favorable overall survival for palliative bile drainage of inoperable MHBS patients compared to unilateral insertions.

A Retrospective Study of Biliary Drainage Strategies for Patients with Malignant Hilar Biliary Strictures.

PurposeThe main aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of different biliary drainage strategies, including percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) versus endoscopic biliary stenting (EBS) and unilateral versus bilateral stenting, in patients with unresectable malignant hilar biliary strictures (MHBSs).Patients and MethodsThis was a retrospective review of patients with inoperable MHBSs who underwent biliary drainage by either EBS or PTBD. Efficacy and safety were compared between the two pathways and between unilateral and bilateral stenting in the EBS group. The survival duration was analyzed with K-M curves and Log rank tests.ResultsFrom January 2015 to December 2019, a total of 206 (126: EBS and 80: PTBD) patients with MHBSs were enrolled in our study and underwent 270 procedures (173: EBS and 97: PTBD). Bilateral stenting was superior to unilateral stenting in terms of clinical success (69.6% vs 50.6%, p=0.039), especially for patients with Bismuth type IV (70.0% vs 30.3%, p=0.002). A higher decrease in bilirubin was seen with PTBD in patients with Bismuth types III–IV (66.9 vs 36.7, p=0.006). A survival advantage was seen in successful drainage (227 days vs 82 days, p<0.001), lower tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) scores (I–II) (195 days vs 139 days, p=0.012), and cholangiocarcinoma (184 days vs 84 days, p=0.001).ConclusionFor patients with advanced MHBSs, bilateral stenting may achieve a better drainage effect than unilateral stenting, and PTBD may have a better performance in relieving cholestasis than EBS. Successful drainage and cholangiocarcinoma may provide greater long-term survival benefits.

ID: 3523485 ENDOSCOPIC PALLIATION OF MALIGNANT HILAR BILIARY STRICTURES: A SINGLE CENTRE EXPERIENCE AND USEFULNESS OF GLASGOW PROGNOSTIC SCORE

The optimum approach to palliation of malignant hilar biliary strictures (MHBS) is unclear. National UK Hospital Episode Statistics data demonstrates 30-day mortality of > 20% following endoscopic and percutaneous stenting.1,2 We aimed to describe outcomes and predictive factors in patients undergoing ERCP and stenting for MHBS in a single tertiary hepatopancreatobiliary centre.

Long Slimmer Metal Stent Is Feasible and Effective for Endoscopic Dual Stent-by-Stent Placement in Malignant Hilar Biliary Stricture.

Bilateral endoscopic biliary stenting remains technically challenging, which limits its wider clinical application. We have developed a novel long (10-12cm) and slimmer (6mm) self-expanded metal stent. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of the new metal stent for palliative treatment of malignant hilar biliary strictures (MHBS). This retrospective study of prospectively collected data included 45 patients with unresectable malignant hilar biliary strictures of Bismuth type II or higher. A pair of long slimmer metal stents were sequentially placed into the intrahepatic duct using the stent-by-stent mode. The success rate and short- and long-term clinical outcomes were observed. The technical success rate was 100%, with a mean procedure time of 43.7 ± 11.5min. The clinical success was achieved in 44 patients (97.8%). Early adverse events included mild acute pancreatitis (n = 2) and cholangitis (n = 3). Later cholangitis occurred in 14 of the 45 patients due to stent occlusions. The median stent patency was 260days (95% CI 228.3-291.7). Stent malfunctions occurred in 23 of the 45 patients, and 15 of them received bilateral endoscopic plastic stents placements. The technical success for the re-intervention was 100% with the mean procedure time of 24.3 ± 4.5min. The median overall survival of the whole group was 229days (95% CI 171.2-286.8). The long slimmer metal stent for bilateral endoscopic stent-by-stent placement proved to be safe, feasible, and effective for MHBS and facilitates endoscopic re-intervention as well.

Personalized Endoscopy in Complex Malignant Hilar Biliary Strictures.

Malignant hilar biliary obstruction (HBO) represents a complex clinical condition in terms of diagnosis, surgical and medical treatment, endoscopic approach, and palliation. The main etiology of malignant HBO is hilar cholangiocarcinoma that is considered an aggressive biliary tract’s cancer and has still today a poor prognosis. Endoscopy plays a crucial role in malignant HBO from the diagnosis to the palliation. This technique allows the collection of cytological or histological samples, direct visualization of the suspect malignant tissue, and an echoendoscopic evaluation of the primary tumor and its locoregional staging. Because obstructive jaundice is the most common clinical presentation of malignant HBO, endoscopic biliary drainage, when indicated, is the preferred treatment over the percutaneous approach. Several endoscopic techniques are today available for both the diagnosis and the treatment of biliary obstruction. The choice among them can differ for each clinical scenario. In fact, a personalized endoscopic approach is mandatory in order to perform the proper procedure in the singular patient.

The risk of acute cholangitis after endoscopic stenting for malignant hilar strictures: A large comprehensive study.

Endoscopic stenting for unresectable malignant hilar biliary strictures (MHBS) remains challenging. Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography cholangitis (PEC) can be the most common and fatal adverse event. In the present study, we aimed to systematically evaluate the incidence, severity, risk factors, and consequences of PEC after endoscopic procedures for advanced MHBS. Of 924 patients, we identified 502 patients with MHBS (Bismuth types II to IV) who underwent endoscopic stenting as the primary therapy at two centers over 16years. PEC and its severity were verified according to the current Tokyo guidelines. A total of 108 patients (21.5%) experienced acute PEC. Mild, moderate, and severe cholangitis were encountered in 51 (10.1%), 42 (8.4%), and 15 (3.0%) patients, respectively. Multivariate analyses showed that metal stenting (verse plastic stenting) (OR 0.328, 95% CI 0.200-0.535, P<0.001) and Bismuth classification (IV vs III/II) (OR 2.499, 95% CI 1.150-5.430) were independent predictors for PEC and the moderate/severe type. Patients with PEC had significantly lower clinical success rates (86.3% vs 41.7%, P<0.001), a higher rate of early death (6.5% vs 0.5%, P<0.001), a shorter median stent patency (4.9 vs 6.4months, P<0.001), and shorter overall survival (2.6 vs 5.2months, P<0.001) compared with the noncholangitis group. After endoscopic stenting for advanced MHBS, cholangitis may occur in as many as 21.5% of patients, which may be associated with a poor prognosis. The risk is high in patients with Bismuth type IV and may be reduced by using metal stents.

A 17 years retrospective study on multiple metal stents for complex malignant hilar biliary strictures: Survival, stents patency and outcomes of re-interventions for occluded metal stents

BackgroundEndoscopic placement of SEMSs for malignant hilar biliary strictures (MHBS) is well-established palliative treatment for inoperable patients. Objectives of this study were evaluation of survival and stents patency after placement of multiple SEMS for palliation of complex MHBS. MethodsRetrospective review of patients with MHBS that underwent ERCP with insertion of multiple SEMSs for palliation. Survival-associated factors and stents patency were analyzed by Cox multivariate analysis. ResultsBetween January 1998 and January 2015, 740 patients with nonoperable MHBS that underwent ERCP were identified and only 18.2% of these received multiple SEMSs. Complications were observed in 7.5% of the patients with no procedure-related mortality. Palliative therapies (chemotherapy, external beam radiotherapy and high dose rate brachytherapy) were done in some patients, and outcomes were evaluated. Overall mean survival of the 134 patients was 323 days. Of these, 59% did not had stents malfunction while 41% patients had episodes of SEMSs malfunction and mean survival after re-interventions was 502.9 days. Survival was not influenced by type of tumor, sex or age. ConclusionsEndoscopic multiple SEMSs placement is safe and effective in patients with complex MHBS. Survival is independent from the type and complexity of MHBS while is prolonged in patients undergoing HDR brachytherapy. Prompt recognition of SEMSs malfunction is fundamental for survival.

Safety, efficacy, and removability of a fully covered multi-hole metal stent in a swine model of hilar biliary stricture: a feasibility study.

Background and study aims Use of fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMS) for biliary drainage of malignant hilar biliary strictures is limited because of risk of cholangitis due to side branch obstruction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of unilateral placement of a multi-hole FCSEMS (FCSEMS-MH), which had a 2.5-mm hole in the center of the membrane on each cavity, in a swine model of hilar biliary stricture. Materials and methods Six female mini pigs were included in this prospective study. The hilar biliary stricture model was prepared using an endobiliary radiofrequency ablation. FCSEMS-MHs were endoscopically inserted into the peri-hilar bile duct of all the animals. Outcomes were assessed in terms of adverse events (AEs) including cholangitis, stent patency, stent migration, and endoscopic stent removability for 1 month after stenting. Results In terms of hilar biliary stricture types, two animals were of Bismuth type I and four were of type II. Technical success rate for endoscopic metal stenting was 100 % (6/6), and the functional success rate, which was evaluated 7 days after stent insertion, was also 100 % (5/5). The immediate overall AE rate was 0 %. There was no procedure-related mortality and stent migration did not occur in any animal during the 4-week stent indwelling period. Stents were removed from all six animals at 4 weeks post-stenting. Conclusion Unilateral placement of FCSEMS-MH might be safe and effect for swine hilar biliary stricture models. However, long-term follow-up and comparative studies are needed to verify the usefulness of this stent.

Prospective comparison of endoscopic bilateral stent-in-stent versus stent-by-stent deployment for inoperable advanced malignant hilar biliary stricture

Although the efficacy of palliative bilateral biliary drainage using self-expandable metal stents has been demonstrated, it is unclear which bilateral method is optimal for advanced malignant hilar biliary strictures (MHSs). This pilot study compared bilateral stent-in-stent (SIS) with stent-by-stent (SBS) deployment for advanced MHSs. Patients with inoperable high-grade MHSs were enrolled in this prospective randomized multicenter study. The primary outcome was the rate of adverse events, whereas secondary outcomes were technical and clinical success, reintervention, therapeutic outcomes, stent patency, and survival duration. This study randomized 69 of 74 pathologically diagnosed patients to the SIS (n= 34) or SBS (n= 35) groups. The total adverse event rate after stent deployment did not differ between the 2 groups (23.5% in the SIS group vs 28.6% in the SBS group, P= .633). The primary technical success rate was 100% (34/34) and 91.4% (32/35) in the SIS and SBS groups, respectively (P= .081). The clinical success rate was 94.1% (32/34) and 90.6% (29/32), respectively (P= .668). The stent patency rate at 3 months was 85.3% in the SIS groupand 65.7% in the SBS group (P= .059). At 6 months, the stent patency rate was 47.1% and 31.4%, respectively (P= .184). The median cumulative stent patency and survival probability did not differ between the 2 groups. Efficacy of bilateral SIS and SBS deployment may be similar in terms of total adverse events, technical and clinical success, stent patency, and survival. The stent patency rates at 3 and 6 months was higher in the SIS group without statistical difference. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01141088.).

Risk factors of ineffective drainage in uncovered self-expandable metal stenting for unresectable malignant hilar biliary strictures

AimIn this study, we assessed the factors contributing to ineffective drainage in the initial transpapillary uncovered self-expandable metal stent (USEMS) placements in patients with unresectable malignant hilar biliary strictures (UMHBSs) (Bismuth type II or higher).MethodsThis was a retrospective, single-center study. A total of 97 patients with UMHBSs who underwent technically successful initial USEMS placements using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) were classified into the effective drainage group (n = 73) or the ineffective drainage group (n = 24). We then compared group characteristics, clinical outcomes, and drained liver volumes. Drained liver volume was measured by using computed tomography volumetry. The definition of effective biliary drainage was a 50% decrease in the serum total bilirubin level or normalization of the level within 14 days of stent placement.ResultsUnivariate analysis showed that ineffective drainage was associated with the pre-ERCP serum total bilirubin level (P = 0.0075), pre-ERCP serum albumin level (P = 0.042), comorbid liver cirrhosis (P = 0.010), drained liver volume (P = 0.0010), and single stenting (P = 0.022). Multivariate analysis identified comorbid liver cirrhosis (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 5.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30–25.85; P = 0.022) and drained liver volume < 50% (adjusted OR, 5.50; 95% CI, 1.50–20.25; P = 0.010) as independent risk factors of ineffective drainage.ConclusionComorbid liver cirrhosis and a drained liver volume < 50% contributed significantly to ineffective drainage in the initial transpapillary USEMS placements for UMHBSs.

Sa1312 ENDOSCOPIC MANAGEMENT OF UNRESECTABLE MALIGNANT HILAR STRICTURES USING THREADED INSIDE STENTS VERSUS METALLIC STENTS

Although endoscopic biliary stenting is one of the most important palliative treatments for patients with malignant biliary strictures, the optimal endoscopic management of malignant hilar strictures remains controversial. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of placing threaded inside plastic stents (threaded PS) above the sphincter of Oddi and compared the results with those obtained from using metallic stents (MS). Patients with unresectable malignant hilar biliary strictures were retrospectively recruited to evaluate the placement of either threaded PS or MS. The duration of stent patency and overall survival duration were compared between these 2 groups of patients. Twenty-seven patients underwent endoscopic placement of indwelling stents (threaded PS = 19, MS = 8). The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant difference in the median duration of stent patency between the threaded PS and MS groups (80 days [range, 20–522] and 149 days [range, 3–531], respectively, P = 0.09, log-rank test) or in the median duration of overall survival (threaded PS: 104 days [range, 20–816] vs MS: 357 days [range, 27–981], P = 0.17, log-rank test). Stent migration did not occur in either group. The proportion of participants requiring re-intervention was similar between the 2 groups (threaded PS: 53.8%, MS: 42.9%, P = 0.56, Fisher’s exact test). The efficacy of threaded PS in the treatment of unresectable malignant hilar strictures is equal to that of MS.

Endoscopic Drainage of >50% of Liver in Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction Using Metallic or Fenestrated Plastic Stents.

Objectives:Endoscopic drainage of complex hilar tumors has generally resulted in poor outcomes. Drainage of >50% of liver volume has been proposed as optimal, but not evaluated using long multifenestrated plastic stents (MFPS) or self-expanding metal stents (SEMS). We evaluated outcomes of endoscopic drainage of malignant hilar strictures using optimal strategy and stents, and determined factors associated with stent patency, survival, and complications.Methods:Cross-sectional study was conducted at an academic center over 5 years. MFPS (10 French or 8.5 French) or open-cell SEMS were used for palliation of unresectable malignant hilar strictures, with imaging-targeted drainage of as many sectors as needed to drain >50% of viable liver volume. Risk factors were evaluated using regression analysis. The cumulative risk was assessed using Kaplan–Meier analysis.Results:77 patients with malignant hilar biliary strictures (median Bismuth IV) underwent targeted stenting (41 MFPS and 36 SEMS). Comparing MFPS vs. SEMS, technical success (95.1 vs. 97.2%, P=0.64), clinical success (75.6 vs. 83.3%, P=0.40), frequency of multiple stents (23/41 vs. 25/36, P=0.19), survival and adverse events were similar, but stent patency was significantly shorter (P<0.0001). Factors associated with survival were Karnofsky score and serum bilirubin level at presentation. Outcomes were independent of Bismuth class with acceptable results in Bismuth III and IV.Conclusions:Endoscopic biliary drainage with MFPS or open-cell SEMS targeting >50% of viable liver resulted in effective palliation in patients with complex malignant hilar biliary strictures. Patency was shorter in the MFPS group, but similar survival and complications were found when comparing MFPS and SEMS group.

Bilateral versus unilateral placement of metal stents for inoperable high-grade malignant hilar biliary strictures: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study (with video)

The efficacy of palliative biliary drainage by using bilateral or unilateral self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) for a malignant hilar biliary stricture (MHS) remains controversial. This prospective, randomized, multicenter study investigated whether bilateral drainage by using SEMSs is superior to unilateral drainage in patients with inoperable MHSs. Patients with inoperable high-grade MHSs who underwent palliative endoscopic insertion of bilateral or unilateral SEMSs were enrolled. The main outcome measurements were the rate of primary reintervention for malfunction after successful placement of SEMSs, stent patency, technical and clinical success rates, adverse events, and survival duration. A total of 133 pathology-diagnosed patients were randomized to the bilateral group (n= 67) or the unilateral group (n= 66). The primary technical success rates were 95.5% (64/67) and 100% (66/66) in the bilateral and unilateral groups, respectively (P= .244). The clinical success rates were 95.3% (61/64) and 84.9% (56/66), respectively (P= .047). The primary reintervention rates based on the per-protocol analysis were 42.6% (26/61) in the bilateral group and 60.3% (38/63) in the unilateral group (P= .049). The median cumulative stent patency duration was 252 days in the bilateral group and 139 days in the unilateral group. The risk of stent patency failure was significantly higher in the unilateral group (log-rank test; P< .01). In a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model to assess stent patency, bilateral SEMS placement was a favorable factor (adjusted hazard ratio 0.30, 95% confidence interval, 0.172-0.521; P< .001). Survival probability and late adverse events were not different between the 2 groups. Unilateral and bilateral drainage strategies by using SEMSs had similar technical success rates, but bilateral drainage resulted in fewer reinterventions and more durable stent patency in patients with inoperable high-grade MHSs. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02166970.).

678 Bilateral Versus Unilateral Deployment of a Metal Stent for a Non-Resectable Malignant High-Grade Hilar Biliary Stricture: A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Study

678 Bilateral Versus Unilateral Deployment of a Metal Stent for a Non-Resectable Malignant High-Grade Hilar Biliary Stricture: A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Study

Rescue EUS-guided intrahepatic biliary drainage for malignant hilar biliary stricture after failed transpapillary re-intervention

Treatment of unresectable malignant hilar biliary stricture (UMHBS) is challenging, especially after failure of repeated transpapillary endoscopic stenting. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided intrahepatic biliary drainage (EUS-IBD) is a recent technique for intrahepatic biliary decompression, but indications for its use for complex hilar strictures have not been well studied. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of EUS-IBD for UMHBS after failed transpapillary re-intervention. Retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients with UMHBS of Bismuth II grade or higher who, between December 2008 and May 2016, underwent EUS-IBD after failed repeated transpapillary interventions. The technical success, clinical success, and complication rates were evaluated. Factors associated with clinical ineffectiveness of EUS-IBD were explored. A total of 30 patients (19 women, median age 66years [range 52-87]) underwent EUS-IBD for UMHBS during the study period. Hilar biliary stricture morphology was classified as Bismuth II, III, or IV in 5, 13, and 12 patients, respectively. The median number of preceding endoscopic interventions was 4 (range 2-14). EUS-IBD was required because the following procedures failed: duodenal scope insertion (n=4), accessing the papilla after duodenal stent insertion (n=5), or achieving desired intrahepatic biliary drainage (n=21). Technical success with EUS-IBD was achieved in 29 of 30 patients (96.7%) and clinical success was attained in 22 of these 29 (75.9%). Mild peritonitis occurred in three of 30 (10%) and was managed conservatively. Stent dysfunction occurred in 23.3% (7/30). There was no procedure-related mortality. On multivariable analysis, Bismuth IV stricture predicted clinical ineffectiveness (odds ratio=12.7, 95% CI 1.18-135.4, P=0.035). EUS-IBD may be a feasible and effective rescue alternative with few major complications after failed transpapillary endoscopic re-intervention in patients with UMHBS, particularly for Bismuth II or III strictures.