Background Male urinary tract infections (mUTIs) are rare in primary care. The definition of mUTIs varies across countries. The therapeutic management of mUTIs in France is based on a 14-day course of fluoroquinolones despite a high risk of antimicrobial resistance. Objectives The objective of this qualitative study was to explore general practitioners’ (GPs) experiences and behaviours regarding the diagnostic and therapeutic management of mUTIs. Methods GPs were recruited by convenience sampling in Haute Normandie (France) and interviewed individually with semi-structured guides. GPs’ experiences and behaviours were recorded and analysed using an interpretive phenomenological approach. Results From March 2021 to May 2022, 20 GPs were included in the study. Defining a mUTI was perceived as a diagnostic challenge. A diagnosis based on clinical evidence alone was insufficient and complementary tests were required. For GPs: ‘male cystitis does not exist’. A mUTI was considered an unusual disease that could reveal an underlying condition. GPs considered fluoroquinolones to be ‘potent’ antibiotics and treated all patients with the same 14-day course. GPs implemented improvement strategies for antibiotic stewardship and followed the guidelines using a computerised decision support system. Conclusions GPs’ experiences of mUTIs are limited due to low exposure and variable clinical presentations in primary care, representing a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. In order to modify GPs’ antibiotic prescribing behaviours, a paradigm shift in the guidelines will need to be proposed. KEY MESSAGES Defining a male urinary tract infection represents a diagnostic challenge for GPs. A diagnosis based on clinical evidence alone is insufficient and complementary tests are required. A male urinary tract infection is an unusual disease in primary care and suggests a more serious underlying condition.
Read full abstract