Major Upper Abdominal Surgery Research Articles

Postoperative pulmonary complications after major abdominal surgery in elderly patients and its association with patient-controlled analgesia

ObjectivesThis study aims to identify the risk factors for postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in elderly patients undergoing major abdominal surgery and to investigate the relationship between patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and PPCs.DesignA retrospective study.MethodClinical data and demographic information of elderly patients (aged ≥ 60 years) who underwent upper abdominal surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from 2017 to 2019 were retrospectively collected. Patients with PPCs were identified using the Melbourne Group Scale Version 2 scoring system. A directed acyclic graph was used to identify the potential confounders, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify independent risk factors for PPCs. Propensity score matching was utilized to compare PPC rates between patients with and without PCA, as well as between intravenous PCA (PCIA) and epidural PCA (PCEA) groups.ResultsA total of 1,467 patients were included, with a PPC rate of 8.7%. Multivariable analysis revealed that PCA was an independent protective factor for PPCs in elderly patients undergoing major abdominal surgery (odds ratio = 0.208, 95% confidence interval = 0.121 to 0.358; P < 0.001). After matching, patients receiving PCA demonstrated a significantly lower overall incidence of PPCs (8.6% vs. 26.3%, P < 0.001), unplanned transfer to the intensive care unit (1.1% vs. 8.4%, P = 0.001), and in-hospital mortality (0.7% vs. 5.3%, P = 0.021) compared to those not receiving PCA. No significant difference in outcomes was observed between patients receiving PCIA or PCEA after matching.ConclusionPatient-controlled analgesia, whether administered intravenously or epidurally, is associated with a reduced risk of PPCs in elderly patients undergoing major upper abdominal surgery.

Comparative Outcome Following Introduction Of Chest Physiotherapy At Hospital Setting After Major Abdominal Surgery

Background: Postoperative respiratory complications are still a matter of ‘folds in forehead’ for surgeons. Though optimum pre-operative preparation and good surgical technique, we always observe that there are some sorts of post-operative chest complications after major abdominal surgery. Now-a-days, chest physiotherapy is usually advised by the surgeons in the immediate postoperative period. But still it is not in a constructive way. There is no well-documented study regarding the effectiveness of chest physiotherapy in an immediate post-operative period of major upper abdominal surgery. So, this is a time demanding study in this regard. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of chest physiotherapy during the immediate postoperative period among patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery. Methods: All patients who underwent major abdominal surgery were selected by purposive sampling. Thereafter, they were scrutinized according to eligibility criteria and 100 patients were finalized. Among them, 50 were enrolled under control group and rest 50 were enrolled under study group. This experimental study was conducted in department of Surgery, Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, from March 2017 to December 2017. Results: The mean age of the participants in control and study groups were 49.73±15.91 year and 53.77±12.21 year respectively. The female to male ratio in these groups was 1:2.13 and 1:3.17 respectively. Two groups presented similar levels of pain before and after surgery. The group receiving chest physiotherapy presented a lower pain score on the immediate postoperative day. The preoperative spirometry values (expressed as a percentage of the predicted values) were almost similar in two groups and presented average decreases of 20% in FVC, FEV, and PEF on the 14th post-operative day. It was observed that the measurements of oxygen-hemoglobin saturations were different for the control (96.7±1.6 vs 95.2±1.8; p=0.005) and study group (97.3±1.8 vs 94.6±2.5; p=0.03). Respiratory distress was not significantly higher in control group but interestingly there were statistically significant differences observed between the control and study group regarding fever, Surgical site infection (SSI) and mean hospital stay. Conclusion: Chest physiotherapy in major abdominal surgery shows an excellent outcome that accelerates the overall recovery. J Dhaka Med Coll. 2022; 31(2) : 177-181

First mobilisation after abdominal and cardiothoracic surgery: when is it actually performed? A national, multicentre, cross-sectional study

ObjectivesKnowledge of clinical practice regarding mobilisation after surgery is lacking. This study therefore aimed to reveal current mobilisation routines after abdominal and cardiothoracic surgery and to identify factors associated with...

Peak oxygen uptake in combination with ventilatory efficiency improve risk stratification in major abdominal surgery.

This pilot study aimed to evaluate if peak VO2 and ventilatory efficiency in combination would improve preoperative risk stratification beyond only relying on peak VO2 . This was a single-center retrospective cohort study including all patients who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) as part of preoperative risk evaluation before major upper abdominal surgery during years 2008-2021. The primary outcome was any major cardiopulmonary complication during hospitalization. Forty-nine patients had a preoperative CPET before decision to pursue to surgery (cancer in esophagus [n = 18], stomach [6], pancreas [16], or liver [9]). Twenty-five were selected for operation. Patients who suffered any major cardiopulmonary complication had lower ventilatory efficiency (i.e., higher VE/VCO2 slope, 37.3 vs. 29.7, p = 0.031) compared to those without complications. In patients with a low aerobic capacity (i.e., peak VO2 < 20 mL/kg/min) and a VE/VCO2 slope ≥ 39, 80% developed a major cardiopulmonary complication. In this pilot study of patients with preoperative CPET before major upper abdominal surgery, patients who experienced a major cardiopulmonary complication had significantly lower ventilatory efficiency compared to those who did not. A low aerobic capacity in combination with low ventilatory efficiency was associated with a very high risk (80%) of having a major cardiopulmonary complication.

Accuracy of the Nova StatStrip® glucometer in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: an observational study.

While the Nova StatStrip® Glucose Hospital Meter System (Nova Biomedical, Waltham, MA, USA) is approved for point-of-care testing (POCT) in critically ill patients, its use during major abdominal surgery has not been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of the Nova StatStrip glucometer in patients undergoing major hepatobiliary procedures using the Parkes error grid (ISO15197:2013) and criteria defined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) POCT12-A3 guideline. This study was a post hoc exploratory study of patients participating in a prospective randomized controlled trial on the effects of hyperinsulinemic normoglycemia (HNC) on infectious outcomes after hepatobiliary surgery. Arterial blood samples were collected before surgery and one hour, two hours, and three hours after baseline. Blood glucose levels were analyzed by the Nova StatStrip glucometer and the GEM® PremierTM 5000 blood gas analyzer. Accuracy of the StatStrip glucometer was assessed using the Parkes error grid for type 1 diabetes mellitus (when 99% of samples were within zones A and B on the Parkes error grid and clinical accuracy was acceptable) and the CLSI POCT12-A3 criteria. Blood glucose levels were analyzed in 135 patients, 70 of whom received the HNC. In the Parkes error grid plotted, all samples at all time-points were within zones A and B. The Nova StatStrip glucometer also satisfied CLSI POCT12-A3 criteria at all time-points. The Nova StatStrip glucometer was accurate in patients undergoing major upper abdominal surgery, independent of the administration of high-dose insulin therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01528189); registered 7 February 2012.

Early Postoperative Fever and Atelectasis in Patients Undergoing Upper Abdominal Surgery.

Atelectasis is a common complication after upper abdominal surgery and considered as a cause of early postoperative fever (EPF) within 48 hours after surgery. However, the pathophysiologic mechanism of how atelectasis causes fever remains unclear. Data for adult patients who underwent elective major upper abdominal surgery under general anesthesia at Seoul National University Hospital between January and December of 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was the association between fever and atelectasis within 2 days after surgery. Of 1,624 patients, 810 patients (49.9%) developed EPF. The incidence of atelectasis was similar between the fever group and the no-fever group (51.6% vs 53.9%, p = 0.348). Multivariate analysis showed no significant association between atelectasis and EPF. Culture tests (21.7% vs 8.8%, p < 0.001) and prolonged use of antibiotics (25.9% vs 13.9%, p < 0.001) were more frequent in the fever group compared to the no-fever group. However, the frequency of bacterial growth on culture tests and postoperative pulmonary complications within 7 days were similar between the two groups. EPF after major upper abdominal surgery was not associated with radiologically detected atelectasis. EPF also was not associated with the increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications, bacterial growth on culture studies, or prolonged length of hospital stay.

Effect of post-extubation high-flow nasal cannula combined with respiratory training versus conventional oxygen therapy on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients after major abdominal surgery: protocol for a single-centre randomized controlled trial

BackgroundNearly 234 million patients undergo surgery each year, and 1.3 million among them develop complications. Patients undergoing major upper abdominal surgery (operation time > 2 h) have a really high incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). The occurrence of PPCs seriously affects the outcomes of patients. High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is as effective as noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in preventing postoperative hypoxaemia and respiratory failure. Respiratory training using positive expiratory pressure (PEP) Acapella (Choice) has been shown to help patients with rapid recovery from postoperative atelectasis. However, no relevant randomized controlled studies have been conducted to clarify the effect of HFNC combined with respiratory training in the prevention of PPCs. This study aims to investigate whether the use of HFNC combined with respiratory training could reduce the incidence of PPCs within 7 days after major upper abdominal surgery compared to that with conventional oxygen therapy (COT).MethodsThis is a randomized controlled single-centre trial. A total of 328 patients who undergo major abdominal surgery will be included. Subjects who fulfil the eligible criteria will be randomly assigned into the combination treatment group (Group A) or COT group (Group B) after extubation. The interventions will begin within 30 min of extubation. Patients in Group A will receive HFNC for at least 48 h and respiratory training three times a day for at least 72 h. Patients in Group B will receive oxygen therapy through a nasal catheter or mask for at least 48 h. Our primary endpoint is the incidence of PPCs within 7 days, and the secondary outcome measures include 28-day mortality, reintubation rate, length of hospital stay, and all-cause mortality within 1 year.DiscussionThis trial would help provide evidence on the effectivity of applying HFNC combined with respiratory training for the prevention of PPCs in patients undergoing major upper abdominal surgery. The objective of this study is to determine the optimal treatment approach to improve the prognosis of patients undergoing surgery.Trial registrationChiCTR2100047146. Registered on 8 June 2021. Retrospectively registered.

Comparison of 6-min walk test distance vs. estimated maximum oxygen consumption for predicting postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery: a prospective cohort study

ObjectiveThe present study aims to evaluate the predictive ability of estimated maximum oxygen consumption (edot{V}O2max) and 6-min walk distance (6MWD) for postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in adult surgical patients undergoing major upper abdominal surgery.MethodThis study was conducted by collecting data prospectively from a single center. The two predictive variables in the study were defined as 6MWD and edot{V}O2max. Patients scheduled for elective major upper abdominal surgery from March 2019 to May 2021 were included. The 6MWD was measured for all patients before surgery. edot{V}O2max was calculated using the regression model of Burr, which uses 6MWD, age, gender, weight, and resting heart rate (HR) to predict aerobic fitness. The patients were categorized into PPC and non-PPC group. The sensitivity, specificity, and optimum cutoff values for 6MWD and edot{V}O2max were calculated to predict PPCs. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 6MWD or edot{V}O2max was constructed and compared using the Z test. The primary outcome measure was the AUC of 6MWD and edot{V}O2max in predicting PPCs. In addition, the net reclassification index (NRI) was calculated to assess ability of edot{V}O2max compared with 6MWT in predicting PPCs.ResultsA total of 308 patients were included 71/308 developed PPCs. Patients unable to complete the 6-min walk test (6MWT) due to contraindications or restrictions, or those taking beta-blockers, were excluded. The optimum cutoff point for 6MWD in predicting PPCs was 372.5 m with a sensitivity of 63.4% and specificity of 79.3%. The optimum cutoff point for edot{V}O2max was 30.8 ml/kg/min with a sensitivity of 91.6% and specificity of 79.3%. The AUC for 6MWD in predicting PPCs was 0.758 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.694–0.822), and the AUC for edot{V}O2max was 0.912 (95%CI: 0.875–0.949). A significantly increased AUC was observed in edot{V}O2max compared to 6MWD in predicting PPCs (P < 0.001, Z = 4.713). And compared with 6MWT, the NRI of edot{V}O2max was 0.272 (95%CI: 0.130, 0.406).ConclusionThe results suggested that edot{V}O2max calculated from the 6MWT is a better predictor of PPCs than 6MWD in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery and can be used as a tool to screen patients at risk of PPCs.

The Quality of Preoperative Glycemic Control Predicts Insulin Sensitivity During Major Upper Abdominal Surgery: A Case-Control Study.

To examine the association of the quality of preoperative glycemic control and insulin sensitivity during major upper abdominal surgery. In cardiac surgery, glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), an indicator of glycemic control during the preceding 3 months, correlated with intraoperative insulin sensitivity. Furthermore, insulin resistance showed a significant association with adverse clinical outcomes. This study is a post hoc exploratory analysis of a randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing elective hepatectomy and receiving the hyperinsulinemic-normoglycemic clamp (HNC) as a potential intervention to reduce surgical site infections (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01528189). Immediately before skin incision, the HNC was initiated by infusing insulin at the rate of 2 mU/kg/min. Dextrose was administered at rates titrated to maintain normoglycemia (4.0-6.0 mmol/L). The average of 3 consecutive dextrose infusion rates during steady state was used as a measure of insulin sensitivity. Primary outcome was the relationship between preoperative HbA1c and insulin sensitivity during surgery. Secondary outcomes were the associations of insulin sensitivity with the patient's body mass index (BMI) and postoperative morbidity. Thirty-four patients were studied. HbA1c (Y = -0.52X + 4.8, P < 0.001, R2 = 0.29), BMI (Y = -0.12X + 5.0, P < 0.001, R2 = 0.43) showed negative correlations with insulin sensitivity. The odds ratio of postoperative complications within 30 days of surgery for every increase in insulin sensitivity by 1 mg/kg/min was 0.22 (95% confidential interval, 0.06-0.59; P = 0.009). We demonstrate significant associations of the quality of preoperative glycemic control and body mass index with insulin sensitivity during hepatectomy. The degree of insulin resistance correlated with postoperative morbidity.

Deep vein thrombosis after open hepatectomy or other major upper abdominal surgery in Taiwan: A prospective and cross-sectional study relevant to the issue of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis

Venous thromboembolism, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is an important complication in patients who underwent open hepatic surgery as well as other major upper abdominal surgery. This study aims to investigate the occurrence of postoperative DVT without pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in such cohorts in Taiwan. This is a prospective, cross-sectional cohort study conducted from March 2010 to December 2011. Patients who underwent major upper abdominal surgery, including open hepatectomy, were enrolled. Color duplex compression ultrasonography (CUS) was used to detect DVT. Symptomatic PE was excluded if there were no suggestive respiratory symptoms or sudden death. Relevant clinicopathological and surgical information of each patient was collected and analyzed. 195 patients (118 male and 77 female) were enrolled, with a median age of 63.6 years. The majority (169/195, 88.7%) were treated for active malignancy. Totally 147 patients received open hepatectomy. Only one asymptomatic and distal postoperative DVT event was identified by CUS, which occurred on a 73-year-old female patient who received a left lateral segmental hepatectomy for removing the advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (pathologic stage, T3aN0M0). No cases of symptomatic PE or sudden death were observed. No correlation between DVT and precipitating factor was demonstrated in our cohort. Without pharmacological thromboprophylaxis, a low rate of postoperative DVT among patients undergoing open hepatectomy (0.7%, 1/147) or major upper abdominal surgery (0.5%, 1/195) in Taiwan was reported. A distinctively regional role of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for hepatic surgery was also suggested by our data.

Fibrinogen and albumin synthesis rates in major upper abdominal surgery.

Plasma fibrinogen and albumin concentrations initially decrease after abdominal surgery. On postoperative days 3–5 fibrinogen concentration returns to the preoperative level or even higher, while albumin stays low. It is not known if these altered plasma concentrations reflect changes in synthesis rate, utilization, or both. In particular a low albumin plasma concentration has often been attributed to a low synthesis rate, which is not always the case. The objective of this study was to determine fibrinogen and albumin quantitative synthesis rates in patients undergoing major upper abdominal surgery with and without intact liver size. Patients undergoing liver or pancreatic resection (n = 9+6) were studied preoperatively, on postoperative days 1 and 3–5. De novo synthesis of fibrinogen and albumin was determined; in addition, several biomarkers indicative of fibrinogen utilization were monitored. After hemihepatectomy, fibrinogen synthesis was 2-3-fold higher on postoperative day 1 than preoperatively. On postoperative days 3–5 the synthesis level was still higher than preoperatively. Following major liver resections albumin synthesis was not altered postoperatively compared to preoperative values. After pancreatic resection, on postoperative day 1 fibrinogen synthesis was 5-6-fold higher than preoperatively and albumin synthesis 1.5-fold higher. On postoperative days 3–5, synthesis levels returned to preoperative levels. Despite decreases in plasma concentrations, de novo synthesis of fibrinogen was markedly stimulated on postoperative day 1 after both hemihepatectomies and pancreatectomies, while de novo albumin synthesis remained grossly unchanged. The less pronounced changes seen following hepatectomies were possibly related to the loss of liver tissue.

Effect of Electrical Impedance Tomography-Guided Early Mobilization in Patients After Major Upper Abdominal Surgery: Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study

Background: Pulmonary complications are common in patients after upper abdominal surgery, resulting in poor clinical outcomes and increased costs of hospitalization. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Guidelines strongly recommend early mobilization post-operatively; however, the quality of the evidence is poor, and indicators for quantifying the effectiveness of early mobilization are lacking. This study will evaluate the effectiveness of early mobilization in patients undergoing an upper abdominal surgery using electrical impedance tomography (EIT). Specifically, we will use EIT to assess and compare the lung ventilation distribution among various regions of interest (ROI) before and after mobilization in this patient population. Additionally, we will assess the temporal differences in the distribution of ventilation in various ROI during mobilization in an effort to develop personalized activity programs for this patient population.Methods: In this prospective, single-center cohort study, we aim to recruit 50 patients after upper abdominal surgery between July 1, 2021 and June 30, 2022. This study will use EIT to quantify the ventilation distribution among different ROI. On post-operative day 1, the nurses will assist the patient to sit on the chair beside the bed. Patient's heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, and ROI 1-4 will be recorded before the mobilization as baseline. These data will be recorded again at 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after mobilization, and the changes in vital signs and ROI 1-4 values at each time point before and after mobilization will be compared.Ethics and Dissemination: The study protocol has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Liaocheng Cardiac Hospital (2020036). The trial is registered at chictr.org.cn with identifier ChiCTR2100042877, registered on January 31, 2021. The results of the study will be presented at relevant national and international conferences and submitted to international peer-reviewed journals. There are no plans to communicate results specifically to participants. Important protocol modifications, such as changes to eligibility criteria, outcomes, or analyses, will be communicated to all relevant parties (including investigators, Institutional Review Board, trial participants, trial registries, journals, and regulators) as needed via email or in-person communication.

Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus versus Continuous Epidural Infusion in Major Upper Abdominal Surgery: A Retrospective Comparative Study

Although recent evidence shows that the programmed intermittent epidural bolus can provide improved analgesia compared to continuous epidural infusion during labor, its usefulness in major upper abdominal surgery remains unclear. We evaluated the effect of programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion on the consumption of postoperative rescue opioids, pain intensity, and consumption of local anesthetic by retrospective analysis of data of patients who underwent major upper abdominal surgery under ultrasound-assisted thoracic epidural analgesia between July 2018 and October 2020. The primary outcome was total opioid consumption up to 72 h after surgery. The data of postoperative pain scores, epidural local anesthetic consumption, and adverse events from 193 patients were analyzed (continuous epidural infusion: n = 124, programmed intermittent epidural bolus: n = 69). There was no significant difference in the rescue opioid consumption in the 72 h postoperative period between the groups (33.3 mg [20.0–43.3] vs. 28.3 mg [18.3–43.3], p = 0.375). There were also no significant differences in the pain scores, epidural local anesthetic consumption, and incidence of adverse events. Our findings suggest that the quality of postoperative analgesia and safety following major upper abdominal surgery were comparable between the groups. However, the use of programmed intermittent epidural bolus requires further evaluation.

Use of a Laparoscopic Witzel Gastrostomy Without Gastropexy in Bariatric and General Surgery

BackgroundGastrostomy placement is the preferred means of long-term enteral feeding for patients who cannot eat by mouth. During laparoscopic gastrostomy, it is standard to perform gastropexy, apposing visceral and parietal peritoneum. In some settings, due to altered anatomy from prior surgery, direct apposition of the stomach to the abdominal wall is not possible. This study reports a series of cases where laparoscopic gastrostomy was performed via a Witzel approach without gastropexy.MethodsA retrospective chart review was performed of all patients at a tertiary academic medical center who underwent Witzel gastrostomy without gastropexy over a 3-year period. In each case, an 18-French tube was placed into the fundus of the stomach and secured with a purse-string suture. A 5-cm serosalized Witzel tunnel was created around the tube using running silk suture. No gastropexy was performed.ResultsSix patients underwent 7 Witzel gastrostomy procedures. In three cases, patients had undergone prior major upper abdominal surgery where adhesive disease prevented gastropexy. In the other four cases, the patients had undergone prior gastric bypass with antecolic antegastric position of the roux limb. No patient suffered leak of gastric contents into the peritoneum, and there were no postoperative complications or mortality related to the gastrostomy.ConclusionIn cases where enteral access is necessary, and where the stomach cannot reach the anterior abdominal wall for gastropexy due to prior surgeries, a Witzel gastrostomy without gastropexy is a safe option which resulted in no morbidity or mortality in our series.

Ketamine Versus Tramadol As an Adjunct To PCA Morphine for Postoperative Analgesia After Major Upper Abdominal Surgery: a Prospective, Comparative, Randomized Trial.

Background and aimsPatient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine is commonly used to provide analgesia following major surgery, but is not sufficient as a monotherapy strategy. This study aimed to compare the adjunctive analgesic effect of ketamine versus tramadol on postoperative analgesia provided via PCA-morphine in patients undergoing major upper abdominal surgeries.MethodsForty-two patients undergoing elective major upper abdominal surgery under general anesthesia were allocated to receive either ketamine (load dose of 0.5 mg kg−1 followed by a continuous infusion of 0.12 mg kg−1 h−1 up to 48 postoperative hours; ketamine group, n = 21) or tramadol (load dose of 1 mg kg−1 followed by a continuous infusion of 0.2 mg kg−1 h−1 up to 48 postoperative hours; tramadol group, n = 21) in addition to their standard postoperative analgesia with PCA-morphine. Postoperative data included morphine consumption, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and side effects during the first 48 postoperative hours after PCA-morphine initiation.ResultsThere were no significant differences in patient demographic and intraoperative data between the two groups. Tramadol group had significantly less total morphine consumption during the first 48 postoperative hours (28.905 [16.504] vs 54.524 [20.846] mg [p < 0.001]) and presented significantly lower VAS scores at rest and mobilization (p < 0.05) than the ketamine group. No statistical difference was recorded between the two groups (p > 0.05) regarding postoperative cough, sedation, hallucinations, pruritus, urine retention, and postoperative nausea and vomiting. However, patients in the ketamine group reported dry mouth more frequently than patients in the tramadol group (p = 0.032).ConclusionsPostoperative administration of tramadol was superior to ketamine due to significantly reduced opioid consumption and better pain scores in patients receiving PCA-morphine after major upper abdominal surgery.

Goal-directed therapy with bolus albumin 5% is not superior to bolus ringer acetate in maintaining systemic and mesenteric oxygen delivery in major upper abdominal surgery: A randomised controlled trial.

Goal-directed therapy (GDT) is increasingly used in abdominal surgery. Whether crystalloids can exert the same effect as colloid, and how this may affect perfusion, is still unclear. The effect of GDT on the systemic oxygen delivery index (sDO2I) and the mesenteric oxygen delivery index (mDO2I) can be quantified by measuring cardiac index and flow in the superior mesenteric artery, respectively. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that intra-operative GDT with bolus human albumin 5% is superior to GDT with bolus ringer acetate in maintaining sDO2I and mDO2I in elective major upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery. Randomised controlled double blinded trial. Odense University Hospital, Denmark, from May 2014 to June 2015. A total of 89 adults scheduled for elective major upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery were randomised and data from 60 were analysed. contraindications for using the LiDCOplus system, known allergy to albumin, pre-operative renal failure, pancreatic cancer and pre-operative down staging using chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy, pregnancy. Patients were randomised to intra-operative GDT with either bolus human albumin or ringer acetate 250 ml, guided by pulse pressure variation and stroke volume. Changes in sDO2I and mDO2I. Secondary outcomes were changes in other haemodynamic variables, fluid balance, blood transfusions, fluid-related complications and length of stay (LOS) in ICU and hospital. Median [IQR] sDO2I was 522 [420 to 665] ml min m in the ringer acetate group and 490 [363 to 676] ml min m in the human albumin group, P = 0.36. Median [IQR] mDO2I was 12.1 [5.8 to 28.7] ml min m in the ringer acetate group and 17.0 [7.6 to 27.5] ml min m in the human albumin group, P = 0.17. Other haemodynamic comparisons did not differ significantly. More trial fluid was administered in the ringer acetate group. We found no significant difference in transfusions, complications or LOS. Bolus human albumin 5% was not superior to bolus ringer acetate in maintaining systemic or mesenteric oxygen delivery in elective major upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery, despite the administration of larger volumes of trial fluid in the ringer acetate group. No significant difference was seen in fluid-related complications or LOS. https://eudract.ema.europa.eu/ Identifier: 2013-002217-36.

Knowledge About Postoperative Pain and Its Management in Surgical Patients.

Background: Research has shown that more than 50% of patients have insufficient postoperative pain relief despite the use of multiple pain management modalities. Insufficient pain relief leads to several pathophysiological effects. One of the barriers to optimal pain relief is patient’s lack of knowledge regarding the options available for pain management and their potential side effects. In this survey, we evaluated surgical patients’ knowledge about postoperative pain and its management in patients undergoing major upper abdominal surgeries at a tertiary care hospital.Methods and Material: This was a cross-sectional survey. A total of 155 patients (18-60 years of age) scheduled to undergo elective major upper abdominal surgery were included after ethical approval and informed consent. Preoperatively, patients were interviewed through a questionnaire regarding knowledge about postoperative pain and its management.Results: The average age of the patients was 42.97 ± 13.05 years. Excellent and good knowledge were observed in 11.61% and 21.94% patients, respectively, whereas fair and poor knowledge were seen in 42.58% and 23.87%, respectively. Inadequate knowledge was more marked regarding analgesic side effects and addiction risk. Education level, history of surgery, and adequate information provision about pain management plan by surgeons preoperatively were significantly associated with a higher level of knowledge about pain and its management (p-value 0.0005, 0.002, and 0.0005, respectively).Conclusion: A considerable proportion of patients have inadequate knowledge about their postoperative pain and its management, particularly in areas of side effects and addiction risk.

Opioid Use Disorder is Associated With Complications and Increased Length of Stay After Major Abdominal Surgery.

The objective of this study was to determine the impact of opioid use disorder (OUD) on perioperative outcomes after major upper abdominal surgeries. OUD, defined as dependence/abuse, is a national health epidemic. Its impact on outcomes after major abdominal surgery has not been well characterized. Patients who underwent elective esophagectomy, total/partial gastrectomy, major hepatectomy, and pancreatectomy were identified using the National Inpatient Sample (2003-2015). Propensity score matching by baseline characteristics was performed for patients with and without OUD. Outcomes measured were in-hospital complications, mortality, length of stay (LOS), and discharge disposition. Of 376,467 patients, 1096 (0.3%) had OUD. Patients with OUD were younger (mean 53 vs 61 years, P < 0.001) and more often male (55.1% vs 53.2%, P < 0.001), black (15.0% vs 7.6%, P < 0.001), Medicaid beneficiaries (22.0% vs 6.4%, P < 0.001), and in the lowest income quartile (32.6% vs 21.3%, P < 0.001). They also had a higher rate of alcohol (17.2% vs 2.8%, P < 0.001) and nonopioid drug (2.2% vs 0.2%, P = 0.023) dependence/abuse. After matching (N = 1077 OUD, N = 2164 no OUD), OUD was associated with a higher complication rate (52.9% vs 37.3%, P < 0.001), including increased pain [odds ratio (OR) 3.5, P < 0.001], delirium (OR 3.0, P = 0.004), and pulmonary complications (OR 2.0, P = 0.006). Additionally, OUD was associated with increased LOS (mean 12.4 vs 10.6 days, P = 0.015) and nonroutine discharge (OR 1.6, P < 0.001). In-hospital mortality did not differ (OR 2.4, P = 0.10). Patients with OUD more frequently experienced complications and increased LOS. Close postoperative monitoring may mitigate adverse outcomes.

Modified Makuuchi incision for major upper abdominal surgeries

Experience of 3 surgical centres with the use of modified Makuuchi incision, for major upper abdominal surgeries, from Mar 2014-Dec 2018, was audited. 144 patients (76 Males, 68 Females) with an average age of 48.25 years underwent surgery using modified Makuuchi incision. 'J' and 'L' incisions were used in 96 and 48 patients, respectively. Further extension of the incision was necessary in 2 patients. Adequate exposure and enhanced surgical ergonomics was observed in all cases. Surgical site infection was seen in 19 patients (13.2%). Incisional hernias was observed in 6 patients (4.2%), on an average follow up of 27.78 months. Modified Makuuchi incision proves efficacious for major upper abdominal surgeries.

Opioid Use Disorder Is Associated with Increased In-Hospital Complications and Length of Stay after Elective Major Upper Abdominal Surgeries

Opioid Use Disorder Is Associated with Increased In-Hospital Complications and Length of Stay after Elective Major Upper Abdominal Surgeries