Major Ear Surgery Research Articles

The VITOM-3D exoscope as an alternative to the operating microscope for major ear surgery: A retrospective case-controlled study.

The VITOM-3D exoscope as an alternative to the operating microscope for major ear surgery: A retrospective case-controlled study.

A Tried and Tested Waterproof Draping Method for Major Ear Surgery.

Preparing and maintaining a clean operative field is the standard of care in all surgical fields globally. Major ear surgery has its own challenges such as the long surgical procedure time and the tricky local anatomical landscape.A waterproof method of draping for major ear surgery is described in this technical report. This method allows for the collection of irrigation fluid in a reservoir while maintaining continued isolation of the operative field during surgery.We discuss the advantages of using a 3M Steri-DrapeTM Aperture Pouch Drape to square the surgical site and create a pouch dedicated to irrigation fluid. Following that, running locking stitches are performed for further reinforcement of the adhesion to the skin, often done in longer procedures. We have identified a technique to ensure better draping. In over 150 cases draped in this method, we have not witnessed drape edge lift, water ingress, or skin avulsion/injury.

Safety of middle-ear day-surgery in children: A STROBE observational study

ObjectiveThe main objective of this pediatric study of otologic surgery was to analyze factors for success of outpatient management. The secondary objective was to study unscheduled postoperative consultations and readmissions. Materials and methodsThis retrospective observational study analyzed clinical characteristics and procedures in consecutive children undergoing major ear surgery over a 3-year period in a teaching hospital. The study followed STROBE recommendations. ResultsWe included 214 day-cases from a total population of 271 children. Median age was 109±44months (9years) [range: 8–196months (16years)]. In 57% of cases, the procedure was performed without mastoidectomy: 84 myringoplasties and 37 tympanoplasties. In 43% of cases, mastoidectomy was associated: 47 cochlear implants and 46 closed tympanoplasties for cholesteatoma. Ninety-five percent of day-surgeries were successful; in 5%, there was crossover to pediatric ENT department admission, for the following symptoms: postoperative nausea and vomiting in 3 cases, pain in 3, and late awakening in 5. Univariate analysis showed a relationship between failure and age under 36months (P=0.002). There were no readmissions. There were unscheduled consultations in 3% of cases: for minor otorrhagia in 5 cases and uncomplicated otorrhea in 2. ConclusionMajor otologic surgery in children is compatible with day-surgery. Younger patients, usually candidates for cochlear implantation, had greater risk of crossover to conventional admission. In this age group, scheduling should be earlier in the morning, with rigorous postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis.

Viability of Ambulatory Major Ear Surgery and Patient Satisfaction

Background: Ambulatory ear surgery is expanding worldwide due to improvements in surgeries, and this has had a highly positive impact on both hospital and patient satisfaction. However, ambulatory major ear surgery remains controversial in our region due to a lack of research, which motivated us to conduct this study. The purpose of the research is to assess the safety of ambulatory major ear surgery and elaborate on the patient satisfaction rate. Methods: To assess complications, the readmission rate, and patient satisfaction with ambulatory major ear surgery, a prospective study of all such surgeries on pediatric and adult patients in a 1-year period in a tertiary hospital was carried out. Results: A total of 47 patients underwent ambulatory major ear surgery, and the results indicated an 89.4% discharge rate and 10.6% readmission rate, as well as high patient satisfaction. Conclusion: Our study showed a rather low complication rate and high patient satisfaction rate with ambulatory major ear surgery. This should encourage other hospitals in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to apply ambulatory ear surgery.

Mastoid pressure dressing - Current practice amongst Canadian pediatric cochlear implant surgeons

ObjectivesMastoid pressure dressing (MPD) has routinely been used following major ear surgery, such as cochlear implant (CI) surgery, to prevent postoperative wound complications. To date, controlled studies have suggested no difference in the incidence of wound complications following MPD use. However, there is a variation in the practice of MPD usage across pediatric CI surgeons. In this study, we aimed to identify the most common type of postoperative dressing management after pediatric cochlear implantation and the factors in the decision-making process for post-surgical care amongst Canadian pediatric CI surgeons. MethodsCanadian Otolaryngologists who perform pediatric CI surgery were identified (n = 18) and contacted via email to complete a short online questionnaire regarding current post-operative head dressing practice following CI surgery. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the response data. ResultsThe participants provided an approximate number of CI's they performed in 2016. 100% of the recipients completed the survey. Approximately 376 CI's were completed in 2016 with an average of 21 CI's per surgeon. 61% of participants routinely used MPDs following surgery justified by reasons such as wound protection, institutional standard of care, and physician's original training practice. ConclusionThere is no clear consensus on the use of MPDs amongst Canadian pediatric CI surgeons. Since the current evidence in the literature suggests no difference in wound complication incidence post-surgery with MPD use, a change in postoperative dressing management to non-use in those that employ this practice may be justified. Eliminating the usage of a MPD may also have potential economic benefits. Further prospective controlled studies may be warranted.

Evolution and safety of day-case major ear surgery

AimsTo study the evolution of middle-ear surgery in 2019 in relation to the French Health Authority target of 66% day-surgery by 2020. Material and methodsA single-center retrospective observational study included all patients undergoing otologic surgery between January 2014 and December 2018 in a university hospital center. 1064 of the 1368 patients were scheduled for outpatient surgery: 309 for otosclerosis, 355 for tympanoplasty with or without ossiculoplasty, 376 for cholesteatoma and 24 for other procedures. Two groups were constituted: day-surgery and conventional, according to hospital stay. Surgery time, follow-up duration, number of crossovers to conventional admission, number of emergency postoperative consultations, number of readmissions and data from the phone-call systematically made the day after surgery were analyzed. The main objective was to evaluate the safety of outpatient surgery for major middle-ear interventions compared to a control group managed under conventional admission during the same period. Results27 patients (2.5%) required crossover, mainly due to disabling vertigo (57.7%). 53 patients (4.9%) consulted before the scheduled 8th day consultation, because of severe pain (23.5%) or dizziness (34.0%). Only 10 patients required emergency readmission. ConclusionProvided that the inclusion criteria are met, all major middle-ear surgery procedures can be performed as day-surgery under satisfactory safety conditions.

Draping Technique for Major Ear Surgery during Pandemic!!!

Draping Technique for Major Ear Surgery during Pandemic!!!

A break-even analysis of major ear surgery.

To determine variables which affect cost and profit for major ear surgery and perform a break-even analysis. Retrospective financial analysis. UK teaching hospital. Patients who underwent major ear surgery under general anaesthesia performed by the senior author in main theatre over a 2-year period between dates of 07 September 2010 and 07 September 2012. Income, cost and profit for each major ear patient spell. Variables that affect major ear surgery profitability. Seventy-six patients met inclusion criteria. Wide variation in earnings, with a median net loss of £-1345.50 was observed. Income was relatively uniform across all patient spells; however, theatre time of major ear surgery at a cost of £953.24 per hour varied between patients and was the main determinant of cost and profit for the patient spell. Bivariate linear regression of earnings on theatre time identified 94% of variation in earnings was due to variation in theatre time (r=-0.969; P<0.0001) and derived a break-even time for major ear surgery of 110.6min. Theatre time was dependent on complexity of procedure and number of OPCS4 procedures performed, with a significant increase in theatre time when three or more procedures were performed during major ear surgery (P=0.015). For major ear surgery to either break-even or return a profit, total theatre time should not exceed 110min and 36s.

Expiratory Limb Ventilation during Unique Failure of the Anesthesia Machine Breathing Circuit

Expiratory Limb Ventilation during Unique Failure of the Anesthesia Machine Breathing Circuit

Major otology day case surgery: viable, cost efficient and safe

There has been no study or institution in Ireland promoting major ear surgery performed as a day case procedure in adults. At present, there is a strong political and financial drive for increased elective day case surgery and also a public responsibility to reduce surgical waiting times. A prospective study of 43-day case otology patients who underwent major otological surgeries over an 18-month period in a tertiary referral center. We recorded morbidity, readmission rates and assessed the relationships between procedures performed and complications observed. We report a same day discharge rate of 88.4% with a next day readmission rate of 2.3%. We report no major morbidities and found no association between the otological procedure performed and complications observed. Furthermore, there was no statistical association between age and complications observed. We have reduced our waiting list from 9 months to 4 weeks over the 18-month period. Major day case otology surgery is an acceptable alternative to an inpatient procedure with favorable discharge rates in comparison to the UK results. Day surgery in this context is safe, cost efficient and expands the surgical possibilities within our department and specialty.

Preoperative planning for ear surgery using store-and-forward telemedicine

Objective To determine if store-and-forward telemedicine can be used to accurately plan ear surgery. Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting Tertiary care hospital. Subjects and Methods Charts were reviewed for elective major ear surgeries resulting from telemedicine referrals during a 13-month period. The store-and-forward telemedicine referrals (electronic consultations) included clinical history, digital images, and audiology data. Consultants reviewed each telemedicine case and documented the recommended surgery and estimated operative time. These charts were matched with patients seen in person during a standard evaluation and had identical surgeries recommended. For the telemedicine evaluation and in-person evaluation groups, the recommended surgeries were compared with actual surgeries performed and the estimated time was compared with the actual operative time. Results Forty-five ear surgeries were recommended by the telemedicine evaluation and were matched with 45 surgeries from the standard evaluation and included tympanoplasty with or without canalplasty, mastoidectomy, stapes surgery, and myringoplasty. Telemedicine and in-person evaluation accurately predicted the surgery 89 percent and 84 percent of the time, respectively. The average difference of “actual time” and “estimated time” for the actual surgical procedures performed was not statistically different between the two groups: 32 minutes for the telemedicine evaluation group and 35 minutes for the in-person evaluation group. Conclusion Store-and-forward telemedicine is as effective as in-person evaluation for planning elective major ear surgery.

Ear, Nose and Throat Day-Case Surgery at a District General Hospital

In 2000, The NHS Plan in the UK set a target of 75% for all surgical activity to be performed as day-cases. We aim to assess day-case turnover for ENT procedures and, in particular, day-case rates for adult and paediatric otological procedures together with re-admissions within 72 h as a proxy measure of safety. Retrospective collection of data (procedure and length of stay) from the computerised theatre system (Galaxy) and Patient Information Management System (PIMS) of all elective patients operated over one calendar year. The setting was a district general hospital ENT department in South East England. All ENT operations are performed with the exception of oncological head and neck procedures and complex skull-base surgery. Overall, 2538 elective operations were performed during the study period. A total of 1535 elective adult procedures were performed with 74% (1137 of 1535) performed as day-cases. Of 1003 paediatric operations, 73% (730 of 1003) were day-cases. Concerning otological procedures, 93.4% (311 of 333) of paediatric procedures were day-cases. For adults, we divided the procedures into major and minor, achieving day-case rates of 88% (93 of 101) and 91% (85 of 93), respectively. The overall day-case rate for otological procedures was 91% (528 of 580). Re-admission rates overall were 0.7% (11 of 1535) for adults and 0.9% (9 of 1003) for paediatric procedures. The most common procedure for re-admission was tonsillectomy accounting for 56% of all adult re-admissions and 78% of paediatric re-admissions. The were no deaths following day-case procedures. ENT surgery is well-suited to a day-case approach. UK Government targets are attainable when considering routine ENT surgery. Day-case rates for otology in excess of targets are possible even when considering major ear surgery.

Ear packing after ear surgery: is it really necessary?

We question the need for packing of the ear canal after ear surgery. For several years, it had not been the first author's standard practice to use post-operative ear packing. During this period, few problems or complications had been encountered. Tertiary referral, academic, paediatric hospital. A retrospective review of all children who had undergone major ear surgery in our unit over the last year was carried out. These cases represented a full range of otological procedures. Post-operative complications and infections in the first six post-operative weeks were recorded. A total of 135 ears were operated upon in 107 patients ranging in age from 11 months to 19 years (mean 9.5 years). During this time period, eight children (7.5 per cent) developed a post-operative ear infection. No cases of tympanic or meatal granulations, problems with the tympanomeatal flap, or meatal stenosis were encountered. All infections were successfully managed with topical antibiotics. We conclude that packing after ear surgery may be safely abandoned. This would not only save valuable operating time, but would also obviate the need for pack removal, always a source of discomfort and anxiety. This is especially important in children, who may subsequently require a further general anaesthesia in order to remove the pack.

Day-case major ear surgery: is it viable?

Day-case major ear surgery: is it viable?

A comparative study of patient satisfaction with day case and in-patient major ear surgery

Major ear surgery can be safely performed on a day case basis (i.e. six hour stay). This study aimed to ascertain whether patients had the same level of satisfaction and speed of recovery following major ear surgery when it was performed as a day case compared with performance as an in-patient procedure. A cross-sectional survey, by postal questionnaire, of patient satisfaction with day case and in-patient major ear surgery was carried out with 158 patients. Comparisons were made between the responses of the two groups. The response rate was 71 per cent. Patients returned to work significantly sooner following day surgery (p < 0.025) but felt their operation to be of significantly more benefit following in-patient surgery (p < 0.05). Patient satisfaction following day case major ear surgery is as good as that following in-patient surgery. This has supported the expansion of this service in our unit.

Sudden death after major head and neck surgery

This review will discuss the mortality after major ear, nose and throat surgery, particularly sudden death. It will also discuss the postoperative follow-up of patients. Sudden death is a rare event after major ear, nose and throat surgery, and occurs mainly during the first three postoperative days. In more recent studies, the mortality rate after neck dissection was below 4%, which is at a lower value than reported in previous studies. Sudden deaths have been described, however, mainly during the first three postoperative days. Alcoholism and perioperative hypotension are two predictive factors for cardiac complications. Careful follow-up of these patients during the early postoperative period should be performed to reduce the mortality by shortening the delay of care.

Day-case major ear surgery: is it viable?

At present there is a strong emphasis on carrying out more elective day-case surgery. This paper presents a series of major ear cases performed on a day-case basis. This is a retrospective review of outcome. Surgery was performed over 10 years at the Queen Elizabeth Queen Mother Hospital (part of the East Kent NHS Trust, UK). Over 10 years 253 major ear cases were performed. The unplanned admission rate for overnight stay was 2.8 per cent and the rate of short-period transfers to in-patient wards (for less than a six-hour stay) was 2 per cent. Our experience shows that major ear surgery, including mastoidectomy, is safe on a day-case basis in all age groups. With the advent of new anaesthetic agents recovery is faster, and modern anti-emetic cover for post-operative nausea and vomiting makes nearly all such major ear surgery feasible as day-case procedures.

Effect of the status after ear surgery and ear pathology on the results of infrared tympanic thermometry

Most publications that deal with infrared tympanic thermometry (ITT) have performed a comparison between the established temperature measurements and ITT. However, to date an understanding of the influence of pathological ear findings on ITT test results is incomplete. Therefore, in the present study ITT was performed in healthy adults (n =21), adult patients with monaural central perforation (n =31) or strong scar formations (n =24) of the tympanic membrane and 18 adult patients after monaural canal wall down surgery. Right and left ear and oral temperature were measured three times by one investigator in a room with a constant temperature of 20-22 degrees C. Between every measurement there was a free time interval of 2 min. In healthy adults (36.50 degrees C vs. 36.51 degrees C) patients with monaural central perforation of the tympanic membrane (36.41 degrees C vs. 36.34 degrees C) and with monaural strong scar formations in the tympanic membrane (36.39 degrees C vs. 36.45 degrees C), no significant difference between the right and left ear could be proved. In contrast to this, a significantly higher temperature in the surgically treated ear compared to the healthy side (36.97 degrees C vs. 36.31 degrees C; P <0.001) occurred in patients with a status of after monaural canal wall down surgery. In summary, it could be demonstrated that, in contrast to minor ear surgery, major ear surgery such as canal wall down has a significant influence on the results of ITT. If a patient's history gives reference to previous ear surgery, an otoscopic examination is necessary in order to exclude the presence of an after-canal-wall-down surgery status and thus to avoid false ITT test results.

Low-dose ketamine failed to spare morphine after a remifentanil-based anaesthesia for ear, nose and throat surgery

Ketamine has been claimed to prevent acute opioid tolerance and hyperalgesia following acute exposure to opioids and its use has been proposed to decrease postoperative morphine consumption. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, controlled study to evaluate the effect of intravenous (i.v.) ketamine on postoperative pain for 48 h after major ear, nose and throat (ENT) surgery. Thirty-one patients received i.v. ketamine 0.15 mg kg(-1) before induction and 2 microg kg(-1) min(-1) during anaesthesia, and 31 patients were administered placebo in a similar manner. Anaesthesia was standardized with remifentanil and propofol, but without nitrous oxide. Standardized postoperative analgesia included paracetamol, methylprednisolone and morphine administered via a patient controlled analgesia (PCA) device. Intra-operative remifentanil consumption was not different between the ketamine group (0.25 +/- 0.07 microg kg(-1) min(-1)) and the control group (0.22 +/- 0.07 microg kg(-1) min(-1)). In the postoperative period, both groups experienced an identical pain course evolution. Cumulative morphine consumption was not significantly different between groups: at 24 h it was 33.3 +/- 14.9 with ketamine and 31.9 +/- 15.3 mg in controls, at 48h it was 40.4 +/- 20.6 mg with ketamine and 42.5 +/- 25.9 mg in controls. Low-dose ketamine added to a remifentanil-based propofol anaesthesia did not reduce morphine consumption after major ENT surgery.

Major ear surgery in a paediatric day care unit.

Abstract Traditionally major ear surgery in children has been regarded as an in-patient procedure. Evidence from the USA for adults, however, concludes that it is both safe and effective to perform many major ear procedures as day cases. We have been carrying out major ear operations on children as day cases routinely for six years in a dedicated children's day unit and examined our data to find out whether it was both safe and feasible to perform major ear surgery in children on a day-case basis. As our main outcome measure we used the rate of unplanned admissions. We found that the unplanned admission rate for surgery, excluding mastoid surgery, was 6.7 per cent and that procedures such as myringoplasty, ossiculoplasty, bilateral pinnaplasty, meatoplasty and tympanotomy with excision of cholesteatoma, were eminently suitable for day surgery.