Introduction: Well-being is directly related to health, people with a balanced smile, between health and beauty, tend to smile more and this generates a condition of wellbeing. A small gingival plastic can modify the smile as a whole, also changing the other variables. In gingival correction, process-specific techniques are used for each case, thus individualizing the patient and the proposed treatment. Objective: It was to present a concise systematic review of the main approaches and clinical outcomes of gingival correction procedures to achieve the best aesthetic smile. Methods: The PRISMA Platform systematic review rules were followed. The search was carried out from August to September 2024 in the Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar databases. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the Cochrane instrument. Results and Conclusion: 68 articles were found and 20 articles were evaluated in full and 08 were included and developed in the present systematic review study. Considering the Cochrane tool for risk of bias, the overall assessment resulted in 15 studies with a high risk of bias and 21 studies that did not meet GRADE and AMSTAR-2. Most studies did not show homogeneity in their results, with X2=89.6%>50%. It was concluded that a gummy smile consists of the visualization of more than 3 mm of gum above the maxillary incisors. For the success of an aesthetic correction, one must be aware of the causes of the change in normality, added to the patient's reasons. The ideal planning is when post-surgical effects directly influence cause removal and patient satisfaction, which is in line with our research results. Digitally assisted esthetic crown lengthening helps to shorten the operation time and reduces the possibility of human errors during measurements. This will be useful to help professionals achieve better results.
Read full abstract