Maintenance Treatment Regimens Research Articles

Predictors of renal relapse in Koreans with lupus nephritis after achieving complete response: a 35-years of experience at a single center.

Renal relapse has known to be a poor prognostic factor in patients with lupus nephritis (LN), but there were few studies that identified the risk factors of renal relapse in real world. We conducted this study based on 35-years of experience at a single center to find out predictors of renal relapse in Korean patients with LN after achieving complete response (CR). We retrospectively analyzed the clinical, laboratory, pathologic and therapeutic parameters in 296 patients of LN who reached CR. The cumulative risk and the independent risk factors for renal relapse were examined by Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses, respectively. The median follow-up period from CR was 123 months. Renal relapse had occurred in 157 patients. Renal relapse occurred in 38.2%, 57.6% and 67.9% of patients within 5-, 10-, and 20-year, respectively. The age at diagnosis of SLE and LN were significantly younger, and the proportions of severe proteinuria and serum hypoalbuminemia were higher in patients with renal relapse. Interestingly, the proportion of receiving cytotoxic maintenance treatment was higher in patients with renal relapse. In Cox proportional hazards regression analyses, only young-age onset of LN (by 10 years, HR = 0.779, p = 0.007) was identified to independent predictor of renal relapse. Young-age onset of LN was only independent predictor and the patients with severe proteinuria and serum hypoalbuminemia also tended to relapse more, despite of sufficient maintenance treatment. Studies on more effective maintenance treatment regimens and duration are needed to reduce renal relapse.

Expert opinions and clinical experiences with chlormethine gel as maintenance treatment for patients with mycosis fungoides.

Maintenance treatment can be recommended for patients with mycosis fungoides (MF) whose disease responds to primary treatment. While positive outcomes have been observed in small studies with maintenance therapy, there is a lack of practical guidelines and agreement on when and how maintenance therapy for MF should be approached. In this article, we discuss expert opinions and clinical experiences on the topic of maintenance therapy for patients with MF, with a focus on chlormethine gel. Ideally, patients should have a durable response before initiating maintenance therapy. The definition of and required duration of durable response are topics that are open to debate and currently have no consensus. Chlormethine gel has several attributes that make it suitable for maintenance therapy; it can be easily applied at home, can be combined with other treatment options for maintenance, and has a manageable safety profile. Chlormethine gel as maintenance therapy can be applied at decreasing frequencies after active treatment with chlormethine gel or other therapies until the minimally effective dose is reached. Patients generally tend to adhere well to chlormethine gel maintenance regimens and may remain on treatment for several years. The experiences described here may be useful for clinicians when deciding on maintenance treatment regimens for their patients. Development of guidelines based on clinical trial outcomes will be important to ensure the most effective maintenance treatment strategies are used for patients with MF.

Clinical and epidemiological correlates of treatment change in patients with NMOSD: insights from the CIRCLES cohort

ObjectiveNeuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) represent rare autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system largely targeting optic nerve(s) and spinal cord. The present analysis used real-world data to identify clinical and epidemiological correlates of treatment change in patients with NMOSD.MethodsCIRCLES is a longitudinal, observational study of NMOSD conducted at 15 centers across North America. Patients with ≥ 60 days of follow-up and receiving on-study maintenance treatment were evaluated. The mean annual relapse rate (ARR) was estimated using negative binomial models; the likelihood of treatment change was estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. Relapses were included as time-varying covariates to estimate the relationship to treatment change.ResultsOf 542 patients included, 171 (31.5%) experienced ≥ 1 relapse on the study and 133 patients (24.5%) had ≥ 1 change in the treatment regimen. Two categories of variables significantly correlated with the likelihood of treatment change: (1) relapse: any on-study relapse (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.91; p < 0.001), relapse phenotypes (HR range = 2.15–5.49; p < 0.001), and pre-study ARR > 0.75 (HR 2.28; p < 0.001); 2) disease phenotype: brain syndrome only vs transverse myelitis involvement at onset (HR 2.44; p = 0.008), disease duration < 1 vs > 5 years (HR 1.66; p = 0.028), or autoimmune comorbidity (HR 1.55; p = 0.015). A subset of these factors significantly correlated with shorter time to first rituximab discontinuation.ConclusionsIn CIRCLES, relapse patterns and disease phenotype significantly correlated with changes in the maintenance treatment regimen. Such findings may facilitate the identification of patients with NMOSD who are likely to benefit from treatment change to reduce relapse risk or disease burden and enhance the quality of life.

33870 Mechlorethamine gel as a maintenance treatment regimen in patients with mycosis fungoides

Background: Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs) are malignant proliferations in the skin that can invade blood, lymph nodes, or viscera. Mycosis fungoides (MF), the most common CTCL, is treated with topical agents, such as mechlorethamine gel 0.016%, in skin-limited stages. Currently, no data exist on maintenance therapy for patients in remission. Thomas Jefferson University has developed a unique protocol to use mechlorethamine as a maintenance regimen after total skin electron beam therapy. Purpose: To determine progression-free survival and efficacy of mechlorethamine as maintenance and active treatment regimens for MF. Methods: A retrospective review of MF patients seen at Thomas Jefferson University from 2012 to 2020 was conducted. Patients of all stages treated with mechlorethamine as maintenance or active treatment with 2 consecutive mSWATs (modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool) documented were included. Treatment outcomes were assessed by change in mSWAT and progression-free survival. Dermatology Life Quality Index surveys before and after treatment were analyzed. Results: Of 186 MF patients, 44 met inclusion criteria. Patients on maintenance therapy had a 65.22% progression-free survival rate with median time to progression of 29.45 months. By-time analysis for responders on active and maintenance treatment showed an increased response over time. Peak responses were seen at last mSWAT recorded. Both cohorts experienced improved quality-of-life scores from initiation to discontinuation of mechlorethamine. Conclusions: Patients on maintenance and active mechlorethamine treatment regimens demonstrated improvement in mSWAT and quality-of-life. Mechlorethamine treatment showed progression-free survival for a median of 29.45 months, indicating this therapy may be an effective maintenance regimen.

Safety and effectiveness of a novel nonpneumatic active compression device for treating breast cancer-related lymphedema: A multicenter randomized, crossover trial (NILE)

ObjectiveAdvanced pneumatic compression devices (APCDs) have been shown to be an effective intervention for lymphedema when used as part of a self-care maintenance treatment regimen. However, adherence to self-care has been poor, and APCDs require patients to be immobile during treatment. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of a novel nonpneumatic compression device (NPCD) for treating lymphedema vs an APCD. MethodsA randomized, crossover head-to-head investigation was performed at five U.S. sites in 2021. The patients had been randomized to either the NPCD or a commercially available APCD. The patients used the randomly assigned initial device for 28 days with a 4-week washout period before a comparable 28-day use of the second device. ResultsData from 50 adult women with unilateral breast cancer-related lymphedema were analyzed. Compared with the APCD, the NPCD was associated with a greater mean reduction in the limb edema volume (64.6% vs 27.7%; P < .001), significantly greater mean improvements in quality of life scores, greater adherence (95.6% vs 49.8%; P < .001), and greater satisfaction with the device (90% vs 14%; P < .001). The patients indicated that use of the NPCD facilitated exercise and was convenient for travel. No adverse events were reported. ConclusionsThe results have shown that the novel NPCD is an effective maintenance treatment for reducing the limb volume in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema. The NPCD device was more effective than an APCD and resulted in greater adherence to self-care interventions and greater patient satisfaction.

Molecular profiling of non-small-cell lung cancer patients with or without brain metastases included in the randomized SAFIR02-LUNG trial and association with intracranial outcome

IntroductionLung cancer remains the most frequent cause of brain metastases (BMs) and is responsible for high morbidity and mortality. Intracranial response to systemic treatments is inconsistent due to several mechanisms: genomic heterogeneity, blood–tumor barrier, and the brain-specific microenvironment. We conducted a study using data from the SAFIR02-LUNG trial. The primary objective was to compare the molecular profiles of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with or without BMs. The secondary objective was to explore central nervous system (CNS) outcomes with various maintenance treatment regimens. MethodsIn total, 365 patients harboring interpretable molecular data were included in this analysis. Clinical and biological data were collected. Genomic analyses were based on array-comparative genomic hybridization and next-generation sequencing (NGS) following the trial recommendations. ResultsBaseline genomic analyses of copy number variations identified a 24-gene signature specific to lung cancer BM occurrence, all previously known to take part in oncogenesis. NGS analysis identified a higher proportion of KRAS mutations in the BM-positive group (44.3% versus 32.3%), especially G12C mutations (63% versus 47%). Protein interaction analyses highlighted several functional interactions centered on EGFR. Furthermore, the risk of CNS progression was decreased with standard pemetrexed maintenance therapy. The highest rate of CNS progression was observed with durvalumab, probably because of the specific intracranial immune microenvironment. ConclusionThis work identified a 24-gene signature specific to lung cancer with BM. Further studies are needed to precisely determine the functional implications of these genes to identify new therapeutic targets for the treatment of lung cancer with BM.

Response to Chlormethine/Mechlorethamine gel Maintenance Treatment Regimen in Patients With Mycosis Fungoides: A Single-center Retrospective Study

BackgroundMycosis fungoides (MF), the most common subtype of Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas, is caused by malignant T-cell proliferations in the skin that can invade blood, lymph nodes, or viscera. Currently, data on efficacy of maintenance therapies in MF are lacking. We developed a unique protocol to use chlormethine/mechlorethamine 0.016% gel formulation as maintenance regimen for MF patients in remission. PurposeTo determine progression-free survival and efficacy of chlormethine/mechlorethamine as maintenance and active treatment regimens for MF. Materials and MethodsA retrospective review of MF patients seen at Thomas Jefferson University from 2012 to 2020 was conducted. Patients of all stages treated with chlormethine/mechlorethamine as maintenance or active treatment with 2 consecutive mSWATs (modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool) documented were included. Treatment outcomes were assessed by change in mSWAT and progression-free survival. Dermatology Life Quality Index surveys before and after treatment were analyzed. ResultsOf 186 MF patients, 44 met inclusion criteria. Patients on maintenance therapy had a 65.22% progression-free survival rate with median time to progression of 29.45 months. By-time analysis for responders on active and maintenance treatment showed an increased response over time. Peak responses were seen at last mSWAT recorded. Both cohorts experienced improved quality-of-life scores from initiation to discontinuation of chlormethine/mechlorethamine. ConclusionPatients on maintenance and active chlormethine/mechlorethamine treatment regimens demonstrated improvement in mSWAT and quality-of-life. Chlormethine/mechlorethamine treatment showed progression-free survival for a median of 29.45 months, indicating this therapy may be an effective maintenance regimen.

Treat to target versus standard of care for patients with Crohn's disease treated with ustekinumab (STARDUST): an open-label, multicentre, randomised phase 3b trial

A treat-to-target strategy, in which strictly defined treatment targets facilitate decision making in clinical practice, is advocated as an optimised management approach for some chronic disorders. The aim of the STARDUST trial was to assess whether a treat-to-target strategy with early endoscopy, regular biomarker and clinical symptom monitoring, and dose intensification for persistent inflammatory activity, was more successful in achieving endoscopic improvement at week 48 than a clinically driven maintenance strategy in patients with moderate-to-severe active Crohn's disease receiving ustekinumab. This open-label, multicentre, randomised phase 3b trial included adults with active, moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI] 220-450 and Simple Endoscopic Score in Crohn's Disease [SES-CD] ≥3) for whom conventional therapy or one biologic therapy, or both, had failed. Patients received intravenous ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg at baseline and subcutaneous ustekinumab 90 mg at week 8. At week 16, patients with a CDAI improvement of 70 or more points from baseline were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive standard-of-care or treat-to-target maintenance treatment through week 48. Randomisation was balanced by using randomly permuted blocks and was stratified by biologic history status and baseline SES-CD score. All patients who signed informed consent, who were not screening failures, and who received at least one dose of study treatment were included in week 16 analyses. All patients included in week 16 analyses and randomly assigned to one of the maintenance treatment regimens were included in the week 48 efficacy and safety analyses (ie, on an intention-to-treat basis). Patients assigned to the treat-to-target arm received ustekinumab every 12 weeks or every 8 weeks based on SES-CD improvement from baseline and could escalate to every 4 weeks through week 48 if prespecified targets were missed. Patients assigned to the standard-of-care arm received ustekinumab every 12 weeks or every 8 weeks; those receiving treatment every 12 weeks could escalate per European labelling. The primary efficacy endpoint was endoscopic response at week 48 (SES-CD score ≥50% decrease from baseline), analysed by non-responder imputation. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03107793, and is active but not recruiting. 498 patients received standard induction treatment, of whom 440 were randomly assigned to the treat-to-target group (n=219) or the standard-of-care group (n=221). At week 48, there was no significant difference in endoscopic response (83 [38%] of 219 patients vs 66 [30%] of 221 patients; p=0·087), endoscopic remission (25 [11%] vs 32 [15%]; p=0·334), mucosal healing (31 [14%] vs 37 [17%]; p=0·449), and clinical remission (135 [62%] vs 154 [70%]; p=0·072) between the two groups; clinical response was significantly lower in the treat-to-target group than in the standard-of-care group (149 [68%] vs 172 [78%]; p=0·020). Other endoscopic, clinical, and biomarker outcomes were generally not significantly different between groups. The most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events were nasopharyngitis (29 [13%] of 219 patients in the treat-to-target group vs 29 [13%] of 221 patients in the standard-of-care group), abdominal pain (23 [11%] vs 19 [9%]), arthralgia (24 [11%] vs 19 [9%]), and headache (24 [11%] vs 21 [10%]). Timely escalation of ustekinumab therapy for patients with Crohn's disease, based on early endoscopic response, clinical symptoms, and biomarkers, did not result in significantly better endoscopic outcomes at week 48 than symptom-driven decisions alone. Future studies need to confirm if some subgroups of patient might benefit from a treat-to-target strategy with ustekinumab. Janssen-Cilag.

INSPECT: A Retrospective Study to Evaluate Long-term Effectiveness and Safety of Darvadstrocel in Patients With Perianal Fistulizing Crohn's Disease Treated in the ADMIRE-CD Trial.

The efficacy of a single administration of darvadstrocel (expanded allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells) for treating complex perianal fistulas in patients with Crohn's disease was demonstrated in a randomized, double-blind trial (ADMIRE-CD [Adipose Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Induction of Remission in Perianal Fistulizing Crohn\'s Disease] trial). The current chart review study (INSPECT [A retrospectIve chart review study evaluatINg the longer-term effectiveneSs of darvadstrocel in PatiEnts who CompleTed ADMIRE-CD]) evaluated the longer-term effectiveness and safety of darvadstrocel. Eligible patients had completed at least 52 weeks in the ADMIRE-CD trial. Data on clinical remission and fistula relapse outcomes were collected retrospectively at 104 and 156 weeks after treatment. Adverse events of special interest (tumorigenicity and ectopic tissue formation) were collected up to 208 weeks after treatment. Eighty-nine patients were included (43 darvadstrocel patients, 46 control subjects). At 52, 104, and 156 weeks posttreatment, clinical remission was observed in 29 (67.4%) of 43, 23 (53.5%) of 43, and 23 (53.5%) of 43 darvadstrocel-treated patients, compared with 24 (52.2%) of 46, 20 (43.5%) of 46, and 21 (45.7%) of 46 control subjects, respectively. In patients with clinical remission at week 52, this remission was sustained at 104 and 156 weeks after treatment in 19 (65.5%) of 29 and 16 (55.2%) of 29 darvadstrocel-treated patients and in 17 (70.8%) of 24 and 13 (54.2%) of 24 control subjects, respectively. Time to fistula relapse and incidence of fistula relapse or new fistula occurrence were not significantly different between groups. Tumorigenicity was reported for 1 (2.2%) patient in the control group (malignant epidermoid carcinoma). No ectopic tissue formation was reported. Real-world follow-up of patients from the ADMIRE-CD trial indicates that clinical remission of complex perianal fistulas can be sustained in the long term irrespective of whether it is achieved through darvadstrocel administration or maintenance treatment regimens and confirms a favorable long-term safety profile of darvadstrocel.

Perspectives of mild asthma patients on maintenance versus as-needed preventer treatment regimens: a qualitative study

ObjectivesAs-needed low-dose combination budesonide-formoterol is recommended by asthma guidelines in many countries as an alternative to maintenance inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for treatment of mild asthma, but there are few data...

MO573CNI AND MTORI-BASED REGIMENS ON FIVE-YEAR COURSE OF BONE MINERAL DENSITY SCORES AFTER RENAL TRANSPLANTATION

Abstract Background and Aims Since glucocorticoids are used in low maintenance doses today, the relationship between calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) and osteoporosis after solid organ transplantation has gained clinical significance. In contrast, (mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors) mTORi agents are shown to have an antiresorptive effect on bone by reducing osteoclastic activity in vitro and in vivo. We investigated the bone mineral density (BMD) changes on an extremely selective group of incident renal transplant recipients under CNI or mTORi-based maintenance treatment regimens during the first five-year posttransplant course. Method This study consists of renal allograft recipients with a dialysis history of less than one year. Patients older than 50 years old, using CNI - mTORi combinations, patients with a history of a prior renal transplant, acute rejection, CNI – mTORi switch after posttransplantation first three months, bisphosphonate treatment, parathyroidectomy, diuretic use, and malignancy excluded to eliminate all confounding factors for bone mineral loss. First and fifth-year BMD scores and simultaneous laboratory parameters were evaluated. Results CNI (n=21) and mTORi (n=17) groups had similar demographics, dialysis vintages, cumulative steroid doses, first and fifth-year parathormone, calcium, phosphate, magnesium, alkaline phosphatase, and 25-OH-vitamin D levels. The femur neck scores of the CNI group decreased from -0.82(±0.96) to -1.52(±0.92) (p=0.020). We observed a significant decrease in the CNI group compared to the mTORi group [-0.70(±0.68) and 0.30(±0.36), respectively; p&amp;lt;0.01] when BMD score changes evaluated among years. The mean femur neck score of the mTORi group insignificantly increased from -1.13(±0.65) to -0.82(±0.56) at the fifth-year DXA scan (p=0.230). Although statistically insignificant, similar trends were also observed in L1-4 scores. Conclusion Our study suggests that CNI-based treatment is associated with decreased femur neck and L1-4 BMD scores, and mTORi-based treatment tends to be beneficial presumably due to their antiresorptive effects in the posttransplant five-year follow-up. Our findings may shed light on long-term maintenance therapy management in renal transplant patients with bone disease if supported by future studies.

Clinical option of pemetrexed-based versus paclitaxel-based first-line chemotherapeutic regimens in combination with bevacizumab for advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer and optimal maintenance therapy: evidence from a meta-analysis of randomized control trials

BackgroundIn the era of immunotherapy, it is still unclear which is the best first-line therapy for patients with oncogenic driver negative advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC) who cannot tolerate immunotherapy, or subsequent therapy for patients with oncogenic driver positive NS-NSCLC whose disease progressed on prior targeted therapy. To assess the optimal choice of first-line and maintenance treatment regimens, we performed a meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of patients with NS-NSCLC on bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy.MethodsAll eligible RCTs comparing pemetrexed-platinum with or without bevacizumab (PP ± B) and paclitaxel-carboplatin with bevacizumab (PC + B) as a first-line therapy, or comparing bevacizumab plus pemetrexed (Pem + B) and bevacizumab alone (B) as a maintenance treatment for advanced NS-NSCLC, were included after systematically searching web databases and meeting abstracts. The main research endpoints were comparisons of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The other endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), 1-year PFS rate (PFSR1y) and major grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events.ResultsData of 3139 patients from six RCTs were incorporated into analyses. Three RCTs were included in an analysis that compared PP ± B and PC + B as a first-line therapy for advanced NS-NSCLC. Patients treated with first-line PP ± B showed similar OS and ORR, but significantly improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88) and PFSR1y (risk ratio [RR], 0.83), as compared to patients treated with PC + B (all P < 0.05). PP ± B resulted in higher rates of grade 3/4 anemia and thrombocytopenia, but lower rates of neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and sensory neuropathy than PC + B (all P < 0.001). The other three RCTs were included in an analysis that compared Pem + B and B as a maintenance treatment. Compared with B, Pem + B maintenance treatment resulted in significant improvements in OS (HR, 0.88), PFS (HR, 0.64), and PFSR1y (RR, 0.70), but higher rates of anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia (all P < 0.001).ConclusionAlthough the first-line PP + B regimen had longer PFS and PFSR1y than the PC + B regimen, no OS difference was observed. Addition of pemetrexed to bevacizumab as maintenance therapy significantly improved OS compared with bevacizumab maintenance alone, but led to more toxicity.

E.U. paediatric MOG consortium consensus: Part 5 - Treatment of paediatric myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disorders.

In recent years, the understanding about the different clinical phenotypes, diagnostic and prognostic factors of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-antibody-associated disorders (MOGAD) has significantly increased. However, there is still lack of evidence-based treatment protocols for acute attacks and children with a relapsing course of the disease. Currently used acute and maintenance treatment regimens are derived from other demyelinating central nervous system diseases and are mostly centre-specific. Therefore, this part of the Paediatric European Collaborative Consensus attempts to provide recommendations for acute and maintenance therapy based on clinical experience and evidence available from mainly retrospective studies. In the acute attack, intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) leads to a favourable outcome in the majority of patients and can be followed by tapering of oral steroids up to a maximum of three months to maintain the benefit of acute treatment by suppressing disease activity. Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) and plasmapheresis constitute second-line therapies in case of insufficient response to IVMP. After a first relapse, maintenance treatment should be started in order to prevent further relapses and the possibility of permanent sequelae. Four first-line therapies consisting of rituximab (RTX), azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil or monthly IVIG have been identified by the consensus group. In case of further relapses despite maintenance treatment, the consensus group recommends treatment escalation with RTX or IVIG, followed by combining those two, and ultimately adding maintenance oral steroids. Many open questions remain which need to be addressed in further international prospective evaluation of MOGAD treatment. This international collaboration is essential to expand the state of current knowledge.

Multidirectional pattern of hair growth with carflizomib use for multiple myeloma

Extensive use of novel therapies for multiple myeloma has been accompanied by intriguing toxic side effects affecting various organs and organ systems. Although skin effects with some of these medications have been well-documented, hair changes are fairly rare. We report herein a unique case of a patient with myeloma who developed multidirectional pattern of scalp hair growth starting at 14 months into treatment with cafilzomib. This pattern of hair growth had not previously been described in the literature.Management and outcome: The patient had a near-complete response to caflizomib, and continues on this maintenance treatment regimen to the present day. There has not been any change in the unusual hair appearance and texture. A score of 5 on the Naranjo nomogram makes the causality relationship between carfilzomib use and the multidirectional hair growth probable. The mechanism by which carfilzomib causes this hair change remains to be elucidated.

Randomized trial of intravenous immunoglobulin maintenance treatment regimens in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

High peak serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels may not be needed for maintenance intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) treatment in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and such high levels may cause side effects. More frequent lower dosing may lead to more stable IgG levels and higher trough levels, which might improve efficacy. The aim of this trial is to investigate whether high frequent low dosage IVIg treatment is more effective than low frequent high dosage IVIg treatment. In this randomized placebo-controlled crossover trial, we included patients with CIDP proven to be IVIg-dependent and receiving an individually established stable dose and interval of IVIg maintenance treatment. In the control arm, patients received their individual IVIg dose and interval followed by a placebo infusion at half the interval. In the intervention arm, patients received half their individual dose at half the interval. After a wash-out phase patients crossed over. The primary outcome measure was handgrip strength (assessed using a Martin Vigorimeter). Secondary outcome indicators were health-related quality of life (36-item Short-Form Health Survey), disability (Inflammatory Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale), fatigue (Rasch-built Fatigue Severity Scale) and side effects. Twenty-five patients were included and were treated at baseline with individually adjusted dosages of IVIg ranging from 20 to 80g and intervals ranging from 14 to 35days. Three participants did not complete the trial; the main analysis was therefore based on the 22 patients completing both treatment periods. There was no significant difference in handgrip strength change from baseline between the two treatment regimens (coefficient -2.71, 95% CI -5.4, 0.01). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in any of the secondary outcomes or side effects. More frequent lower dosing does not further improve the efficacy of IVIg in stable IVIg-dependent CIDP and does not result in fewer side effects.

DOP56 Ustekinumab maintained clinically meaningful improvement in health-related quality of life in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis: Results from the UNIFI long-term extension

Abstract Background The UNIFI maintenance study evaluated the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous (SC) ustekinumab (UST) in patients with moderately–severely active UC who had responded to IV UST induction. Previously, we reported that health-related quality of life (HRQoL) improvements achieved after UST induction were maintained through Week 44 with UST maintenance. Here, we evaluated HRQoL through Week 92 in patients who continued UST maintenance in the long-term extension (LTE). Methods Patients who completed the maintenance study were eligible to continue their maintenance treatment regimen (placebo [PBO], UST90mg q12w, or UST90mg q8w) in the LTE if the investigator thought they could benefit from continued treatment. PBO patients discontinued from the LTE after the maintenance study was unblinded. Per investigator discretion, patients could receive a single dose adjustment (UST q12w to q8w or UST q8w to q8w [sham dose adjustment]) starting at Week 56. The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) is a 32-item questionnaire with a total score ranging from 32 to 224. Higher scores indicate better HRQoL, a score ≥170 indicates remission, and a change ≥16 was defined as clinically meaningful. General health was assessed using SF-36. A change ≥5 points in physical and mental component scores was defined as clinically meaningful. In this analysis, patients who dose adjusted were considered treatment failures. Results Most patients who received UST in the LTE maintained the improvements in IBDQ and SF-36 that were achieved after induction (Tables 1 and 2) through Week 92. Overall, 158 of 284 patients (55.6%) who received UST were in IBDQ remission at Week 92, and 114 of 169 patients (67.5%) who were in IBDQ remission at maintenance baseline were in IBDQ remission at Week 92. Of the 284 patients, 179 (63.0%) achieved a ≥16-point improvement in IBDQ score from induction baseline to Week 92. Of 250 patients who achieved a ≥16-point improvement from induction baseline to maintenance baseline, 154(61.6%) maintained a ≥16-point improvement at both Weeks 44 and 92. For SF-36, 142 of 284 patients (50.0%) had a ≥5-point improvement from induction baseline to Week 92 in the physical component score, while 128 of 284 (45.1%) had a ≥5-point improvement in the mental component score. Conclusion The majority of patients who were treated with UST in the LTE generally maintained improvements in IBDQ and SF-36 scores that were achieved after IV induction.

Clinical analysis of chimeric antigen receptor T cells immunotherapy in treatment of one patient with relapsed/refractory primary central nervous system lymphoma

Objective To investigate the indications, complications and prognosis of chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) in the treatment of relapsed/refractory primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). Methods On May 21, 2015, one patient with relapsed/refractory PNCSL admitted to the Department of Hematology, Xuzhou Medical University Affiliated Hospital was selected as the study object. The peripheral blood lymphocytes of the patient were collected by blood cell apheresis, and humanized CD19 and CD20 CAR-T were prepared. CAR is stably expressed in CD3+ T cells via lentiviral vector. On July 27, 2017, the patient received FC regimen of conditioning regimen by fludarabine 30 mg/(m2·d), d-5 to -3, and cyclophosphamide 750 mg/(m2·d), d-5. Humanized CD19 and CD20 CAR-T were transfused with dose of 1×106/kg each, on the first day after conditioning regimen. The clinical features and diagnosis of the patient were summarized by retrospective analysis. This study was in line with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki revised in 2013 and informed contents of clinical research and CAR-T immunotherapy were obtained from the subject. Results ① The patient was male and 45 years old. In February 2015, the patient appeared headache, dizziness, and blindness in the right eye without obvious incentives. In March 2015, the patient was diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma based on his pathology and immunohistochemistry results. In January 2016, the patient achieved unconfirmed complete remission (CRu) after surgical removal of the corpus callosum, radiotherapy, and high-dose radiation therapy. In March 2017, the patient′s primary disease recurred, but the condition was relieved after receiving temozolomide+ high-dose methotrexate(HD-MTX) chemotherapy. ②After 10 d of CAR-T infusion, the patient′s headache symptoms were significantly reduced and the orientation was recovery. Grade 1 cytokine release syndrome(CRS) occurred during treatment. Patient′s symptoms improved after he received symptomatic supportive treatment. After 29, 69 and 116 d of CAR-T transfusion, the results of patient′s head-enhanced MRI showed that the primary lesion continued to shrink. And the patient reached partial remission (PR). After 69 and 116 d of CAR-T transfusion, CAR-T were detected in cerebrospinal fluid flow cytometry of patient. After 154 d of CAR-T transfusion, the patient returned to hospital for treatment, due to left limb weakness . Re-examination of head-enhanced MRI showed recurrence of primary disease. Then the patient received salvage treatment of high-dose chemotherapy. As of July 2019, the patient was still receiving temozolomide + HD-MTX chemotherapy for maintenance treatment. Conclusions As a new treatment regimen, CAR-T immunotherapy could be used as a salvage bridging treatment in the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory PCNSL. And it is still necessary to maintain and consolidate the treatment. However, the above conclusions are based on one case study, and the maintenance treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory PCNSL after CAR-T immunotherapy, such as the time of maintenance treatment beginning , as well as the maintenance treatment regimen, still need to be further explored. Key words: Lymphoma, non-Hodgkin; Lymphoma, large B-cell, diffuse; Receptors, chimeric antigen; Primary central nervous system lymphoma; Recurrence; Refractory; Chimeric antigen receptor T cells; Immunotherapy

Hydroxychloroquine Improves the Disease Activity and Allows the Reduction of the Corticosteroid Dose Regardless of Background Treatment in Japanese Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Objective Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was not approved in Japan until 2015, and its therapeutic potential has not been explored in depth. We evaluated the additional therapeutic effect of HCQ in Japanese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) on maintenance therapy. Methods Patients with SLE who visited our hospital from 2015 to 2016 and were taking prednisolone (PSL) at <20 mg/day were retrospectively evaluated. All patients were divided into three groups according to their maintenance treatment regimen: PSL + immunosuppressant, PSL alone, and no treatment. We compared the changes in the SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI), PSL dose, and cumulative flare rate between patients who were and were not treated with HCQ. Results Among the 165 patients evaluated, 35 (21.2%) were treated with HCQ. The mean period of observation did not differ markedly between patients who did and did not receive HCQ (p=0.3). The SLEDAI and PSL dose were significantly reduced in patients who received HCQ, regardless of their background treatment regimen. The cumulative flare rate was lower in patients who received HCQ than in those who did not in the PSL + immunosuppressant and no maintenance treatment groups (p=0.03 and 0.05, respectively). Conclusion The addition of HCQ reduced the disease activity and allowed PSL dose reduction, regardless of background treatment, in Japanese patients with SLE.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Ropeginterferon Alfa-2b in Patients with Polycythemia Vera — Final Phase I/II Peginvera Study Results

Background: Ropeginterferon alfa-2b (Ropeg) is a novel long-acting monopegylated IFN-alpha-2b. Due to reduced dosing frequencies, better tolerability and improved compliance, Ropeg may be a favorable treatment option for long-term therapy in patients with polycythemia vera (PV).Study design: PEGINVERA phase I/II (NCT: 2010-018768-18), a prospective, open-label, multicenter study, investigated the efficacy and safety of Ropeg for long-term treatment in 51 patients aged ≥18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of PV, regardless of prior cytoreductive therapy. Following ≥1 year of 2-weekly treatment, patients who responded well to Ropeg were permitted to switch to a 4-weekly dosing regimen.Results: Baseline characteristics of the study cohort and interim safety and efficacy data were presented previously (Gisslinger et al., Blood, 2015). Fifty-one patients were treated: Median exposure to Ropeg was approximately 5.1 years (61 months; range: 0 to 87 months). Patients were treated for a median of approximately 2 years (98.9 weeks; (Q1-Q3: 69.0 - 117.4 weeks) on the 2-weekly regimen and 4 years (207.1 weeks; Q1-Q3: 158.6 - 242.0 weeks) on the 4-weekly regimen.The best observed individual hematological response for patients in the efficacy analysis set (FAS) was a complete hematological response for 27/42 (64.3%) and a partial response for 14/42 (33.3%) patients. Patients required a median of 34 weeks (Q1-Q3: 10-96 weeks) treatment to achieve a complete hematological response, and 10 weeks (Q1-Q3: 10-20 weeks) to achieve any hematological response. Switch from 2 to 4-week dosing regimen had no apparent effect on maintenance of response.With respect to JAK-2 allele burden, the best observed individual molecular response was a complete response for 12/42 (28.6%) patients and a partial response for 19/42 (45.2%) patients. Lowest JAK-2 values relative to baseline are presented by patient in Figure 1. Patients required a median of 82 weeks (Q1-Q3: 44-115 weeks) treatment to achieve a complete molecular response and 34 weeks (Q1-Q3: 18-55 weeks) treatment to achieve any molecular response. Irrespective of dosing regimen, molecular responses tended to increase over time.Most patients reported at least one adverse reaction (AR) to treatment (409 ARs in 48/51 [94.1%]); however, the majority (296 in 44 [86.3%] patients) were mild; 102 (in 34 [66.7%] patients) were moderate and 11 (in 10 [19.6%] patients) were severe. The most frequently reported ARs (frequency >20%) were arthralgia, influenza-like illness and fatigue. Twelve serious treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE) reported by 8/51 patients (15.7%) were considered to be treatment related: 2 events of depression, 2 of positive anti-thyroid antibodies, and one each of acute stress disorder, increased antinuclear antibodies, arthralgia, atrial fibrillation, fatigue, influenza-like illness, pyrexia, and increased transaminases.25 patients completed the trial. The majority of discontinuation due to TEAE (13/21 patients) occurred in the first year, when the recommended slow up-titration of Ropeg could not be applied because of the maximum-tolerated-dose design. After the first year, only 8 additional patients discontinued because of TEAE.Conclusions:The final results of this phase I/II study of Ropeg in patients with PV support the findings of the pivotal phase III clinical trial (Gisslinger et al., Blood 2015) with respect to safety and efficacy as determined by hematological, clinical and molecular parameters. In addition, these data provide evidence that treatment with Ropeginterferon alfa-2b for up to 7 years is efficacious, well-tolerated and disease-modifying at both the 2 week and 4 week maintenance treatment regimens. [Display omitted] DisclosuresGisslinger:AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Shire: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kralovics:MyeloPro Diagnostics and Research GmbH: Equity Ownership. Krauth:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Greil:MSD: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sandoz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zoerer:AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Empson:AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Grohmann-Izay:AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG: Employment. Klade:AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG: Employment.

An Update on Therapies for Proliferative Lupus Nephritis: How Certain Can We Be About the Evidence?

An Update on Therapies for Proliferative Lupus Nephritis: How Certain Can We Be About the Evidence?