Maintenance Treatment Of Ulcerative Colitis Research Articles

Cost Effectiveness of Subcutaneous Vedolizumab for Maintenance Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis in Canada.

Background and ObjectivesUlcerative colitis is highly prevalent in Canada and cost-effective ulcerative colitis therapies are warranted. Vedolizumab subcutaneous (SC) formulation was recently approved for ulcerative colitis maintenance therapy. We assessed vedolizumab SC cost effectiveness vs conventional and advanced therapeutics in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis from a Canadian public healthcare payer perspective.MethodsA hybrid decision tree/Markov model was developed to evaluate vedolizumab SC costs, quality-adjusted life-years, and cost effectiveness vs conventional therapy, adalimumab SC, infliximab intravenous, golimumab SC, tofacitinib, ustekinumab SC, and vedolizumab intravenous. This model predicts the number of patients achieving clinical response and remission after treatment induction, and sustained benefit during maintenance treatment. To account for statistical uncertainties, the base-case analysis was conducted in a probabilistic manner. Scenario analyses examined the impact of previous treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor agents, dose escalation, loss of efficacy, and treatment adherence.ResultsIn the base-case analysis, conventional therapy was the most cost-effective therapeutic option in the overall population. Vedolizumab SC was cost effective and dominant compared with other advanced therapies (adalimumab, golimumab, infliximab, tofacitinib 5 mg, ustekinumab, and vedolizumab intravenous). The annual vedolizumab SC cost per patient was reduced vs ustekinumab SC, tofacitinib 5 mg, vedolizumab intravenous, and golimumab SC by $47,024, $3251, $2120, and $2004 (Canadian dollars), respectively, and exceeded that of infliximab, adalimumab, and conventional therapy by $582, $3293, and $41,024, respectively. Among the treatments, vedolizumab SC generated the highest quality-adjusted life-years overall (14.21), which translated into the best incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-years gained over conventional therapy in the overall population ($109,374) and in anti-tumor necrosis factor-naïve and anti-tumor necrosis factor-experienced patients ($41,658/$114,287).ConclusionsConventional therapy offered the most cost-effective therapeutic option followed by vedolizumab SC. Based on a $50,000/quality-adjusted life-year threshold, vedolizumab was cost effective in anti-tumor necrosis factor-naïve patients but not the overall population also when compared to conventional therapy.Graphical abstract Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41669-022-00331-9.

P341 Pharmacokinetics and exposure-response analyses of upadacitinib in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis – Analyses of induction and maintenance clinical trials

Abstract Background Upadacitinib (UPA), an oral selective and reversible JAK1 inhibitor, showed favorable efficacy and safety profile in Phase, 2b and, 3 studies in subjects with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response analyses were performed to characterize the relationships between UPA plasma exposures and key efficacy and safety endpoints using data from these studies. Methods The pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy, and safety of UPA for induction and maintenance treatment in UC were evaluated in a Phase, 2b induction, two replicate Phase, 3 induction, and a Phase, 3 maintenance clinical trials. UPA PK was characterized using data from, 978 UC patients. UPA exposure-response relationships for key efficacy and safety endpoints at the end of induction and maintenance periods were characterized using data from, 1,234 and, 449 UC patients, respectively. Quartile plots and logistic regression models were used to evaluate the exposure-response relationships across UPA doses of, 7.5 mg to, 45 mg once daily (QD) for induction and, 15 mg to, 30 mg QD for maintenance. Results UPA PK in UC patients was consistent with other patient populations and between the induction and maintenance periods. The percentage of subjects achieving clinical and endoscopic efficacy endpoints at the end of the induction increased with increasing UPA average plasma concentration (Cavg), and became mostly flat at Cavg values approximately equivalent to the, 45 mg QD (Figure, 1). For maintenance treatment, there was a trend for increasing the percentage of subjects achieving clinical remission, steroid-free remission, endoscopic improvement, and histo-endoscopic mucosal improvement within the range of UPA plasma exposures evaluated. Exposures associated with UPA, 30 mg QD were estimated to provide a, 8% to, 10% increase in the percentage of subjects achieving these endpoints compared to, 15 mg QD (Figure, 2). There was no trend for exposure-response relationships within the range of evaluated UPA exposures for any of the evaluated safety endpoints (>2 g/dL decrease in hemoglobin and >2 g/dL decrease in hemoglobin and < lower limit for normal, hemoglobin <, 8 g/dL, lymphopenia ≥ Grade, 3, neutropenia ≥ Grade, 3, Herpes Zoster infection, serious infections, and pneumonia) at the end of induction or maintenance periods. Conclusion UPA plasma exposures associated with the, 45 mg QD induction dose maximized efficacy for clinical and endoscopic endpoints at Week, 8. Plasma exposures associated with UPA, 30 mg maintenance dose provide additional incremental benefit compared to, 15 mg QD. No trends were observed for increase in the evaluated safety events with increasing UPA plasma exposures at the end of induction or maintenance periods.

DOP39 Effect of baseline disease characteristics on clinical outcomes in moderate-to-severe Ulcerative Colitis treated with upadacitinib: Results from a Phase 3 trials programme

Abstract Background Upadacitinib (UPA) is an oral, once-daily (QD), selective Janus kinase inhibitor that has demonstrated efficacy in the induction and maintenance treatment of Ulcerative Colitis (UC). This analysis aimed to assess the impact of baseline UC characteristics on clinical outcomes following UPA therapy. Methods Patients (pts) with moderately to severely active UC who had failed conventional or biological treatment were enrolled in two randomised, double-blind (DB), placebo (PBO)-controlled, Phase 3, 8-week induction studies of UPA 45 mg QD vs PBO. Pts achieving a clinical response (decrease from baseline in Adapted Mayo score ≥2 points and ≥30% from baseline, plus a decrease in rectal bleeding score [RBS] ≥1 or an absolute RBS ≤1) at Week (Wk) 8 entered a 52-week, randomised, DB, PBO-controlled, Phase 3 maintenance study, and received UPA 15 mg QD, UPA 30 mg QD, or PBO. The primary efficacy endpoint was clinical remission per Adapted Mayo score at Wk 8 (induction) and at Wk 52 (maintenance). Pre-specified (PS) and post hoc (PH) analyses were conducted by baseline disease activity (full Mayo score ≤9 or >9) (PS), extent (PS), duration (<2, 2–5, >5–10, >10 years [yrs]) (PH), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) level (≤5 or >5 mg/L) (PH). Results 988 pts were included in the induction studies, and 451 in the maintenance study. The treatment difference between UPA 45 mg QD and PBO excluded zero for all subgroups at Wk 8 (Figure 1). Wk 8 remission rates were lower for full Mayo score >9 vs ≤9, and for CRP >5 vs ≤5 mg/dL, with minimal effects of disease extent or duration. Wk 52 maintenance of remission rates were greater with UPA 15 mg and 30 mg QD vs PBO (16–44% and 30–50% difference, respectively), and with UPA 30 vs UPA 15 mg QD. This incremental benefit of the 30 mg dose was greater in pts with severely (full Mayo score >9) vs moderately active disease (Figure 2); 15 mg and 30 mg demonstrated similar efficacy in pts with Mayo score <9. Statistically non-significant numerical advantages for UPA 30 mg vs UPA 15 mg maintenance were seen in all subgroups, with the exception of hs-CRP >5 mg/L. Conclusion UPA 45 mg QD is an effective induction treatment for UC, regardless of baseline disease characteristics. Both 15 and 30 mg UPA doses are effective maintenance regimens, regardless of baseline disease characteristics. However, the 30 mg dose shows a trend towards increased benefit vs 15 mg in pts with Mayo score >9 and extensive disease. This analysis suggests that while UPA 15 mg may be most appropriate for patients with UC with a low inflammatory burden (per full Mayo score and extent), the 30 mg dose may be more appropriate for those with a high one.

P573 The safety profile of upadacitinib maintenance therapy in ulcerative colitis in the Phase 3 U-ACHIEVE study is consistent with that in approved indications

Abstract Background The oral, small-molecule, selective and reversible Janus kinase inhibitor upadacitinib (UPA) is approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) and ankylosing spondylitis, and is under investigation in ulcerative colitis (UC). This assessment reviewed adverse event (AE) data for UPA maintenance therapy in UC in the context of the known long-term safety profile of UPA in its approved indications. Methods Safety data were collated from patients with UC who responded to 8 weeks’ induction treatment with UPA 45 mg once daily (QD) and were enrolled in U-ACHIEVE to receive maintenance treatment (UPA 15 mg, 30 mg QD or placebo) for ≤52 weeks. Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with an onset on or after the first dose, and ≤30 days after the last dose, of study drug. Safety data were also collected from two AD (15 and 30 mg doses), six RA (15 mg dose in all, 30 mg dose in four) and two PsA (15 and 30 mg doses) Phase 3 trials. Exposure-adjusted event rates were calculated for TEAEs and AEs of special interest (AESIs). Results Data were available for 746 patients with UC who received 8 weeks’ induction with UPA 45 mg and were randomised to maintenance treatment as follows: placebo, n=245; UPA 15 mg, n=250; UPA 30 mg, n=251. Rates of any AEs, serious AEs, severe AEs and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation were lower with both UPA doses versus placebo (Table 1). No deaths occurred. Rates of the above AE categories in patients with UC who received maintenance treatment with UPA 15 or 30 mg were within the ranges previously reported in AD, RA and PsA, apart from neutropenia (Table 1). AESI rates in UC were generally similar with UPA and placebo, except for higher rates of herpes zoster, creatine phosphokinase elevation, hepatic disorder, and venous thromboembolism (VTE), but lower rates of anaemia, with UPA (Table 2). Non-melanoma skin cancer was reported only with UPA 30 mg. One adjudicated major cardiovascular event was reported in each of the placebo and UPA 30 mg arms. VTE only occurred with UPA treatment (two events per arm). Based on the limited number of patients exposed, and apart from a higher VTE rate, AESI rates in the UC maintenance study were generally similar to those reported in patients receiving long-term treatment with UPA 15 or 30 mg QD in AD, RA or PsA. Conclusion The safety profile of UPA maintenance treatment in UC is consistent with that in its approved indications. Although VTE rates were higher in UC, background VTE risk is known to be increased in UC versus AD, RA and PsA. This review identified no new important safety risks.

Risk factors and management strategies associated with non-response to aminosalicylates as a maintenance treatment in ulcerative colitis.

Aminosalicylates (5-ASA) are used as the first-line maintenance treatment in patients with mild-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC). Early identification of patients at high risk for 5-ASA non-response and appropriate therapeutic escalation are essential to avoid disease progression. However, the absence of a standardized definition for treatment success makes this a challenging task. The focus of the current review was to describe the risk factors and management strategies associated with 5-ASA non-response. Rates of 5-ASA failure can vary from 17 % to 75 % according to different success definitions, of which clinical relapse is the most prevalent and studied condition. Younger age and endoscopic activity at diagnosis, extensive colitis, early need for corticosteroids, elevated inflammatory markers and non-adherence are consistent risk factors of 5-ASA failure. Given the effectiveness, safety profile and tolerability of this medication, therapy optimization is critical before treatment escalation. Combined use of systemic and topical therapy at an appropriate dose in a once-daily administration and control of adherence could improve success rates.

Research Progress of Traditional Chinese Medicine Maintenance Treatment for Ulcerative Colitis during Remission

Research Progress of Traditional Chinese Medicine Maintenance Treatment for Ulcerative Colitis during Remission

DOP16 An evaluation of the exposure–efficacy relationship for subcutaneous vedolizumab maintenance treatment of Crohn’s disease: Pharmacokinetic findings from VISIBLE 2

Abstract Background The exposure–efficacy relationship and immunogenicity rates of the new vedolizumab subcutaneous (SC) formulation have been established for maintenance treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC).1 Here, we report vedolizumab SC exposure–efficacy and immunogenicity in Crohn’s disease (CD). Methods VISIBLE 2 (NCT02611817; EudraCT 2015-000481-58) was a pivotal, phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab SC (108 mg every 2 weeks) as maintenance treatment in patients with moderately to severely active CD. Following intravenous (IV) vedolizumab (300 mg Week 0 and 2) induction, patients with a clinical response at Week 6 (≥70-point decrease in CD activity index [CDAI] from Week 0) were randomised to blinded maintenance treatment and included in the analyses. Vedolizumab serum concentrations were measured prior to dosing using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Immunogenicity was assessed with a drug-tolerant electrochemiluminescence assay. Predicted vedolizumab trough concentrations at Week 52 were grouped by quartiles (Q), and Week 52 efficacy outcome rates calculated for each Q. Missing efficacy outcome data were imputed as failures. Efficacy outcomes were clinical remission (CDAI ≤150) and enhanced clinical response (≥100-point decrease in CDAI from Week 0 at Week 52). Results Following vedolizumab IV induction (N = 644), patients with a clinical response were randomised and received vedolizumab SC (N = 275) or placebo (N = 134) as maintenance treatment. At Week 52, patients on vedolizumab SC maintenance had a positive exposure–efficacy relationship for clinical remission (Q1: 37.7%; Q4: 50.7%) and enhanced clinical response (Q1: 37.7%; Q4: 53.6%; Figures 1 and 2). Overall, 7/275 (2.5%) patients on vedolizumab SC (following vedolizumab IV induction) developed anti-vedolizumab antibodies (AVAs): 3/7 patients were persistently AVA positive and 4/7 had neutralising antibodies. Five of 7 AVA-positive patients on vedolizumab SC did not achieve clinical remission and enhanced clinical response at Week 52; 2 of those patients were persistently AVA-positive. Immunogenicity was not associated with injection-site reactions or hypersensitivity reactions. Conclusion These preliminary results suggest a trend for higher vedolizumab SC serum concentrations with greater efficacy in CD, but the association was less pronounced than was reported in UC. (1) The AVA rate was similar to what was observed in prior vedolizumab IV studies. (2) In this study, vedolizumab immunogenicity appeared to be associated with clinical outcome. References

Endoscopic score vs blood cell indices for determining timing of immunomodulator withdrawal in quiescent ulcerative colitis

While immunomodulators (IMs) are used as key drugs in remission maintenance treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC), there has been no evidence to date for determining monitoring methods and drug withdrawal. Therefore, we examined if a decrease in white blood cell count (WBC) and an elevation in mean cell volume (MCV) could be used as optimization indices and if mucosal healing (MH) could be a rationale for determining the time of IM withdrawal. Subjects were 89 UC patients who were using IMs and for whom clinical remission had been maintained. Those with a Rachmilewitz Clinical Activity Index score of 4 or lower and those with a Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) of 0 or 1 were defined as MH. The remission maintenance rates of the following comparative groups were examined: an IM continuation group and an IM withdrawal group; an IM continuation group with a WBC of less than 3000 or a MCV of 100 or greater and an IM continuation group with a WBC of 3000 or greater and a MCV of 99 or lower; an IM continuation group of patients for whom MH had been achieved and an IM continuation group of patients for whom MH had not been achieved; and an IM withdrawal group with a MES of 0 and an IM withdrawal group with a MES of 1. A significantly higher remission maintenance rate was observed in the IM continuation group compared to the withdrawal group (p < 0.01). No significant difference was observed between the IM continuation group with a WBC of less than 3000 or a MCV of 100 or greater and the IM continuation group with a WBC of 3000 or greater and a MCV of 99 or lower (p = 0.08). Higher remission maintenance rates were observed in the IM continuation group of patients for whom MH had been achieved compared to the IM continuation group of patients for whom MH had not been achieved (p = 0.03). No significant difference was observed between the IM withdrawal group with MES 0 and the IM withdrawal group with MES 1. (p = 0.48). This retrospective study showed that remission maintenance could be firmly obtained by continuing IM administration in case of endoscopic MH; however, MH was not an indicator of IM withdrawal.

Induction and maintenance treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: A comprehensive review

Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) are the two major types of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We conducted a comprehensive review of meta-analyses to summarize the reported effectiveness of different drugs for IBD. We performed a literature search and a total of 110 meta-analyses from 66 articles were summarized and re-analyzed (62 in UC and 48 in CD). In summary, 5-ASA was more effective than placebo in both induction and maintenance treatment of UC, but there were conflicting results on the effect of 5-ASA on the induction treatment or relapse of CD. The use of immunomodulatory agents in the induction or maintenance phase of UC and CD using immunomodulators appeared to be more effective than placebo, but the results were impacted by small number of patients, discordant results with the largest study and risk of biases. Anti-TNF-α and anti-integrin therapeutic antibodies in both, induction and maintenance, showed a better efficacy than placebo in a large proportion of patients analyzed. Other agents, such as probiotics, antibiotics, omega-3, were shown to be more effective than placebo, but the same issues arose as stated above with the use of immunomodulatory agents. In conclusion, we performed a comprehensive review of meta-analysis on comparative efficacy of pharmacotherapy used in the management of IBD. Our review will augment our understanding of the treatment of UC and CD by providing a guideline for interpreting the statistically significant findings and discusses the optimal choice for IBD treatment.

Probiotics combined with aminosalicylic acid affiliates remission of ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial.

We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of probiotic combined with aminosalicylic on induction remission maintenance treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). We conducted systematic searches in several Chinese and English databases from inception to June 2018, screening randomized controlled trials about effect of probiotics combined with aminosalicylic acid on UC. The evaluation indicator was the rate of remission. The relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. A total of 27 studies with 1942 patients were included. The results indicated that the remission rate was significantly higher in the group using probiotics combined with aminosalicylic acid than that in the group using aminosalicylic acid alone (RR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.27–1.53, P=0.000). The subgroup analysis indicated that probiotics combined with aminosalicylic acid can significantly elevate the remission rate in both mild to moderate (RR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.16–1.54, P=0.000) and active stage (RR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.27–1.64, P=0.000) UC. In different number of bacterium, drug types and treatment periods, the combination with probiotics can significantly increase the remission rate UC. The funnel plot shows slight publication bias. Probiotics in conjunction with aminosalicylic can obviously increase the clinical remission rate of activity UC than drug alone. There was no significant difference between combined with mesalazine group and salicylazosulfapyridine group.

Late breaking abstracts

Late breaking abstracts

Sustained Clinical Efficacy and Mucosal Healing of Thiopurine Maintenance Treatment in Ulcerative Colitis: A Real-Life Study.

Background and Aims Thiopurines are commonly used for treating ulcerative colitis (UC), despite the fact that controlled evidence supporting their efficacy is limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of thiopurines as maintenance therapy in a large cohort of UC patients. Methods All UC patients receiving thiopurine monotherapy at three tertiary IBD centers from 1995 to 2015 were identified. The primary endpoint was steroid-free clinical remission. Secondary endpoints were mucosal healing (MH), defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore 0, long-term safety, and predictors of sustained clinical remission. Results We identified 192 patients, contributing a total of 747 person-years of follow-up (median follow-up 36 months, range 1–210 months). Steroid dependency was the most common indication for thiopurine treatment (58%). Steroid-free remission occurred in 45.3% of patients; 36.3% stopped thiopurines because of treatment failure and 18.2% for adverse events or intolerance. The cumulative probability of maintaining steroid-free remission while on thiopurine treatment was 87%, 76%, 67.6%, and 53.4% at 12, 24, 36, and 60 months, respectively. MH occurred in 57.9% of patients after a median of 18 months (range 5–96). No independent predictors of sustained clinical remission could be identified. Conclusions Thiopurines represent an effective and safe long-term maintenance therapy for UC patients.

Long-term maintenance treatment of ulcerative colitis in eastern India: a 15-year follow-up.

Clinical data of 65 histologically documented ulcerative colitis patients from January 2001 to December 2013 were prospectively recorded till June 2017 and analysed to determine the outcome of long-term maintenance treatment. Drugs used were 5-aminosalicylates, steroids and azathioprine. Primary outcome measure was relapse. Though 73.8% patients relapsed, most occurred within the first five years with mild to moderate severity and were easily controlled with the same medicines. None had progressive disease; drug discontinuation was possible in six cases. Side effects of drugs were negligible. Rates of surgery, colon cancer, complications and disease-related death were very low. Longer disease duration, azathioprine discontinuation and 5-aminosalicylate use in dose < 2.4 g/d were positively associated with relapses. Biologics were not used in any patient. We conclude that long-term effective use of low-cost drugs in India may obviate the need for newer more expensive drugs.

Thiopurine Treatment in Ulcerative Colitis: A Critical Review of the Evidence for Current Clinical Practice.

Due to toxicity problems and controversial evidence, thiopurine use in ulcerative colitis (UC) has faced a lot of criticism. We present a critical review of the literature on efficacy of thiopurines in UC. Studies evaluating therapeutic efficacy of thiopurine remission induction and/or maintenance treatment in UC were identified using the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. Out of 5 randomized trials on thiopurine induction treatment, 3 demonstrated a significant effect of thiopurine treatment vs mesalamine or placebo in steroid-dependent UC patients: (1) lower endoscopic activity scores, (2) higher clinical remission rates, and (3) more patients who discontinued steroids. Two found no significant difference in clinical and endoscopic remission of azathioprine compared with sulfasalazine or placebo in patients with active UC. Out of 7 randomized trials on thiopurine maintenance treatment, 4 demonstrated significant higher clinical and endoscopic remission rates in thiopurine-treated patients compared with placebo or mesalamine. Three found no significant difference in clinical and endoscopic remission of thiopurine maintenance treatment compared with sulfasalazine or placebo. All studies that investigated thiopurine treatment in UC had shortcomings, such as lack of sufficient power, no use of blinding, allowed concomitant treatment with steroids, and no endoscopy to confirm active disease at study entry or to evaluate therapeutic efficacy. Hence, current clinical practice of thiopurine treatment in UC is based on minimal and controversial evidence. This underscores the need for clinical studies with sufficient power and objective end points in order to determine efficacy of thiopurines in UC.

Efficacy and safety of vedolizumab as a treatment option for moderate to severe refractory ulcerative colitis in two patients after liver transplant due to primary sclerosing cholangitis

Vedolizumab is a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody that selectively blocks the lymphocyte integrin α4β7 and prevents its interaction with endothelial adhesion molecules and subsequent transmigration to the gastrointestinal tract. The drug was approved in 2014 for the induction and maintenance treatment of ulcerative colitis and moderate to severe Crohn's disease that is refractory or intolerant to conventional treatment with corticoids and immunosuppressants and/or anti-TNFα drugs. However, inflammatory bowel disease has a variable behavior following liver transplant. One third of patients with ulcerative colitis associated with primary sclerosing cholangitis are expected to deteriorate despite receiving immunosuppression to prevent rejection. There is limited experience with anti-TNFα agents in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in the setting of liver transplantation and the studies to date involve a limited number of cases. The efficacy and safety data of vedolizumab in this situation are unreliable and very preliminary. We present two cases with the aim to present the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab after one year of treatment in two patients who underwent a transplant due to primary sclerosing cholangitis. One case had de novo post-transplant ulcerative colitis refractory to two anti-TNFα drugs (golimumab and infliximab). The other patient had a colostomy due to fulminant colitis and developed severe ulcerative proctitis refractory to infliximab after reconstruction with an ileorectal anastomosis.

Adalimumab Maintenance Treatment in Ulcerative Colitis: Outcomes by Prior Anti-TNF Use and Efficacy of Dose Escalation.

The impact of prior anti-TNF use on "real-life" outcomes of adalimumab therapy in ulcerative colitis (UC) is not well known. To compare the influence of prior anti-TNF use on the outcomes of adalimumab maintenance treatment in UC patients. We also assessed the effectiveness of adalimumab dose escalation. This retrospective multicenter cohort study included consecutive UC who advanced to an adalimumab maintenance regimen. Patients in whom adalimumab was discontinued prior to week eight of treatment were excluded. The co-primary efficacy endpoints were the cumulative probabilities of adalimumab failure-free survival and colectomy-free survival. We also assessed the need for and the effectiveness of adalimumab dose escalation. Of 184 UC on maintenance treatment with adalimumab, 116 (63%) had previous anti-TNF use. After a median follow-up of 23months (interquartile range 13-49), 112 patients (60%) maintained corticosteroid-free clinical response. Sixty-nine patients (37%) had adalimumab failure, and 22 (12%) needed colectomy. Anti-TNF-naïve patients had significantly lower adjusted rates of adalimumab failure (hazard ratio [HR] 0.65; p<0.001), adalimumab dose escalation (HR 0.35; p=0.002), and need for colectomy (HR 0.26; p<0.004). Seventy-six patients (41%) needed dose escalation after secondary loss of response, and 47% of these regained response after escalation. Short-term response after escalation was identified as a significant predictor of colectomy avoidance (HR 0.53; p=0.007). In this "real-life" cohort of UC patients on maintenance treatment with adalimumab, anti-TNF-naïve patients had significantly better long-term outcomes. Adalimumab dose escalation enabled recovery of response in nearly half of patients.

Ozanimod Induction and Maintenance Treatment for Ulcerative Colitis

BackgroundOzanimod (RPC1063) is an oral agonist of the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor subtypes 1 and 5 that induces peripheral lymphocyte sequestration, potentially decreasing the number of activated lymphocytes circulating to the gastrointestinal tract.MethodsWe conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial of ozanimod in 197 adults with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 1:1:1 ratio, to receive ozanimod at a dose of 0.5 mg or 1 mg or placebo daily for up to 32 weeks. The Mayo Clinic score was used to measure disease activity on a scale from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more severe disease; subscores range from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. The primary outcome was clinical remission (Mayo Clinic score ≤2, with no subscore >1) at 8 weeks.ResultsThe primary outcome occurred in 16% of the patients who received 1 mg of ozanimod and in 14% of those who received 0.5 mg of ozanimod, as compared with 6% of those who received placebo (P=0.048 and P=0.14, respectively, for the comparison of the two doses of ozanimod with placebo). Differences in the primary outcome between the group that received 0.5 mg of ozanimod and the placebo group were not significant; therefore, the hierarchical testing plan deemed the analyses of secondary outcomes exploratory. Clinical response (decrease in Mayo Clinic score of ≥3 points and ≥30% and decrease in rectal-bleeding subscore of ≥1 point or a subscore ≤1) at 8 weeks occurred in 57% of those receiving 1 mg of ozanimod and 54% of those receiving 0.5 mg, as compared with 37% of those receiving placebo. At week 32, the rate of clinical remission was 21% in the group that received 1 mg of ozanimod, 26% in the group that received 0.5 mg of ozanimod, and 6% in the group that received placebo; the rate of clinical response was 51%, 35%, and 20%, respectively. At week 8, absolute lymphocyte counts declined 49% from baseline in the group that received 1 mg of ozanimod and 32% from baseline in the group that received 0.5 mg. The most common adverse events overall were anemia and headache.ConclusionsIn this preliminary trial, ozanimod at a daily dose of 1 mg resulted in a slightly higher rate of clinical remission of ulcerative colitis than placebo. The trial was not large enough or of sufficiently long duration to establish clinical efficacy or assess safety. (Funded by Receptos; TOUCHSTONE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01647516.)

Dose Escalation and Healthcare Resource Use among Ulcerative Colitis Patients Treated with Adalimumab in English Hospitals: An Analysis of Real-World Data.

ObjectiveTo describe the real-world use of adalimumab for maintenance treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) and associated healthcare costs in English hospitals.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingAnalysis of NHS Hospital Episode Statistics linked with pharmacy dispensing data in English hospitals.PatientsAdult UC patients receiving ≥240mg during adalimumab treatment induction, subsequently maintained on adalimumab.OutcomesFrequency and pattern of adalimumab use and dose escalation during maintenance treatment and associated healthcare costs (prescriptions and hospital visits).Results191 UC patients completed adalimumab treatment induction. 83 (43.46%) dose escalated during maintenance treatment by ≥100% (equivalent to weekly dosing) (median time to dose escalation: 139 days). 56 patients (67.47%) subsequently de-escalated by ≥50% (median time to dose de-escalation: 21 days). Mean all-cause healthcare costs for all patients ≤12 months of index were £13,892. Dose escalators incurred greater mean healthcare costs than non-escalators ≤12 months of index (£14,596 vs. £13,351). Prescriptions accounted for 96.49% of UC-related healthcare costs (£11,090 of £11,494 in all patients).ConclusionsWithin the cohort, 43.46% of UC patients escalated their adalimumab dose by ≥100% and incurred greater costs than non-escalators. The apparent underestimation of adalimumab dose escalation in previous studies may have resulted in underestimated costs in healthcare systems.

A Rare Association: Celiac Disease and Ulcerative Colitis

We report the case of a 17 year old male patient, hospitalized for the evaluation of bleeding diarrhea with glairs. Colonoscopy and colonic biopsies allowed the diagnosis of ulcerative colitis (UC) in pancolitis. The patient put under corticosteroid and azathioprine. The evolution was marked by the disappearance of bleeding diarrhea. Faced with persistent iron deficiency anemia despite clinical remission, which worsened during the evolution and absence of geophagia or a capital deficiency, a gastroscopy was performed, the upper gastrointestinal endoscopy has not objectified visible macroscopic anomaly, however pathological study of duodenal biopsies showed partial villous atrophy with intraepithelial lymphocytoce. After the suspicion of a celiac disease, the assessment was completed by an immunological study that showed anti-gliadin antibodies and endomysial antibodies. The patient was put under gluten-free diet associated with the maintenance treatment of ulcerative colitis. On the occasion of this observation, we emphasize the rarity of this association and we the complex pathogenesis of celiac disease that could have similarities with that of ulcerative colitis.

P490. Comparative analysis of the cost of maintenance treatment of Ulcerative Colitis with different compound preparation of mesalazine

P490. Comparative analysis of the cost of maintenance treatment of Ulcerative Colitis with different compound preparation of mesalazine