Maintenance Therapy For Lupus Nephritis Research Articles

Long-Term Safety and Effectiveness of Tacrolimus in Patients With Lupus Nephritis in Japan: 10-Year Analysis of the Real-World TRUST Study.

To assess the long-term safety and effectiveness of tacrolimus as maintenance therapy in patients with lupus nephritis (LN) receiving treatment in real-world clinical settings in Japan. An open-label, noncomparative, observational, prospective postmarketing surveillance study was conducted in 1395 patients with LN receiving maintenance treatment with tacrolimus at 278 medical institutions across Japan over a period of 10 years. Tacrolimus continuation rate and cumulative incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), relapse, progression to renal failure, and progression to dialysis were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Safety data were available for 1355 patients, almost half (49.3%) of whom remained on tacrolimus for the full 10 years of follow-up. A significant reduction in mean (SD) daily oral corticosteroid dose was observed from 16.0 (9.7) mg/day at 4 weeks after initiation of tacrolimus treatment to 7.2 (4.4) mg/day at year 10 (P < 0.001). The most frequently reported serious ADRs were infections (reported for 131 [9.7%] patients). Except for infections, no marked increase in the incidence of any other ADRs was seen over time, including renal impairment, malignant tumors, and cardiac dysfunction. Renal function was generally well maintained over the 10 years of follow-up. At year 10, cumulative rates of relapse, renal failure, and dialysis were 44.5%, 12.2%, and 4.5%, respectively. Tacrolimus was effective and generally well tolerated as maintenance therapy for LN in a large cohort of patients in Japan followed for 10 years, almost half of whom remained on therapy for the entire duration of follow-up. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01410747).

Comparison of efficacy of continuous mycophenolate mofetil with sequential cyclophosphamide and tacrolimus as maintenance therapy for lupus nephritis.

To evaluate the renal response to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as maintenance therapy for lupus nephritis (LN) in Japanese patients, we compared the efficacy of MMF and the sequential use of monthly intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCY) followed by tacrolimus (TAC). We examined 14 patients with LN who were treated with continuous MMF as induction and maintenance therapies (MMF group) and 10 patients with LN who received monthly IVCY as induction therapy followed by maintenance therapy with TAC (IVCY-TAC group). We assessed the therapeutic effects of each treatment regimen on renal manifestations and serological findings over a 36-month period after treatment initiation. Mean urine protein-to-creatinine ratios in the MMF and IVCY-TAC groups significantly decreased from 2.75 to 0.11g/gCr and from 3.26 to 0.22g/gCr, respectively. Significant improvements in serum immunological variables (serum complement C3 or C4 levels and the anti-double-stranded DNA antibody titer) and reductions in the SLE disease activity index and daily prednisolone dosages were observed in both groups during induction therapy and were maintained during maintenance therapy. Efficacy was similar between the MMF and IVCY-TAC groups. MMF has potential as an effective treatment for renal manifestations in Japanese patients throughout induction and maintenance therapies for LN, as an alternative to conventional IVCY-TAC therapy, and as a glucocorticoid-sparing agent.

Leflunomide versus azathioprine for maintenance therapy of lupus nephritis: a prospective, multicentre, randomised trial and long-term follow-up

ObjectivesPrevious studies have compared mycophenolate mofetil and azathioprine as maintenance therapy for lupus nephritis (LN). Leflunomide is an immunosuppressant widely used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. The aim of...

Rituximab as Maintenance Therapy in Lupus Nephritis

Rituximab as Maintenance Therapy in Lupus Nephritis

Multicentric study comparing cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil and azathioprine in the maintenance therapy of lupus nephritis: 8years follow up.

The ideal long-term maintenance therapy of Lupus Nephritis (LN) is still a matter of debate. The present study was aimed at comparing the efficacy/safety profile of cyclosporine (CsA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) in long-term maintenance therapy of LN. We performed a retrospective study of patients with biopsy-proven active LN. After induction therapy, all patients received maintenance therapy with CsA, MMF or AZA based on medical decision. Primary endpoint was complete renal remission (CRR) after 8years (defined as proteinuria < 0.5g/24h, eGFR > 60ml/min/1.73mq); secondary endpoints were: CRR after 1year, renal and extrarenal flares, progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD stage 3 or above) and side-effects. Out of 106 patients, 34 received CsA, 36 MMF and 36 AZA. Clinical and histological characteristics at start of induction therapy were comparable among groups. At start of maintenance therapy, CsA patients had significantly higher proteinuria (P = 0.004) or nephrotic syndrome (P = 0.024) and significantly lower CRR (23.5% vs 55.5% on MMF and 41.7% on AZA, P = 0.024). At one year, CRR was similar in the three groups (79.4% on CsA, 63.8% on MMF, 58.3% on AZA, P = 0.2). At 8years, the primary endpoint was achieved by 79.4% of CsA vs 83.3% of MMF and 77.8% of AZA patients (P = 0.83); 24h proteinuria, serum creatinine, eGFR were similar. CKD stage 3 or above developed in 8.8% of CsA, in 8.3% of MMF and in 8.3% of AZA patients (P = 0.92). Flares-free survival curves and incidence of side-effects were not different. This is the first study comparing CsA, MMF and AZA on long-term LN maintenance therapy. All treatments had similar efficacy in achieving and maintaining CRR, despite more severe baseline clinical features in patients treated with CsA.

Maintenance therapy for lupus nephritis with mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine. A meta-analysis .

Maintenance therapy for lupus nephritis (LN) remains controversial. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) describes the comparative benefits and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) versus azathioprine (AZA) as maintenance therapy in patients with LN. RCTs that compared the maintenance regimens of MMF and AZA in the treatment of LN were included. Outcomes were mortality, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), renal relapse, doubling of serum creatinine, and adverse effects. We performed the meta-analysis using Review Manager software (version 5.3). Seven RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences between the MMF and AZA groups in regards to mortality, relapse, ESRD, doubling of serum creatinine, infection, or gastrointestinal upset. However, the MMF group incurred lower risks of leukopenia (RR = 0.16, 95% CI = 0.06 - 0.40; p = 0.0001) and amenorrhea (RR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.09 - 0.59, p = 0.002) compared with the AZA group. MMF seems more effective than AZA as maintenance therapy for LN although the differences did not reach statistical significance. Furthermore, the MMF group incurred lower risk of leukopenia than AZA. However, more RCTs are needed to confirm the conclusion.

Long-term effects of tacrolimus for maintenance therapy of lupus nephritis: a 5-year retrospective study at a single center.

Previously, we reported the short-term effects of tacrolimus in treating lupus nephritis (LN); however, long-term data are lacking. We conducted a retrospective study of 26 adult patients with LN. Tacrolimus was initiated at a dose of 3mg/day after induction therapy. We retrospectively collected data on renal response; modified lupus nephritis disease activity index (m-LNDAI), including hematuria, proteinuria, complement 3, anti-double-stranded DNA antibody, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR); and prednisolone (PSL) dose. Three patients discontinued tacrolimus treatment because of related complications, including acute myeloblastic leukemia, tremor, or a general personal choice or a desire to become pregnant. We analyzed data from 23 patients who were treated with tacrolimus over a 5-year period. The mean urinary protein/creatinine ratio decreased from a baseline of 0.24 (min 0.00-max 4.20) to 0.00 (0.00-7.05) at 5years (p = 0.0134), while eGFR levels remained unchanged throughout the 5years. The mean m-LNDAI decreased from a baseline of 3.00 (0.00-12.0) to 2.00 (0.00-4.00) at 5years (p = 0.0074). The mean PSL dose decreased from a baseline of 0.33 (0.00-0.75)mg/kg/day to 0.15 (0.15-0.33) at 5years (p = 0.001). Our results suggest that tacrolimus is potentially effective for treating LN and that the current dosage was generally well tolerated for long-term maintenance treatment in our patients with LN.

Cytokine targets in lupus nephritis: Current and future prospects

Despite advancements in the care of lupus nephritis, a considerable proportion of patients may respond poorly or flare while on conventional immunosuppressive agents. Studies in murine and human lupus have illustrated a pathogenic role for several cytokines by enhancing T- and B-cell activation, autoantibodies production and affecting the function of kidney resident cells, therefore supporting their potential therapeutic targeting. To this end, there is limited post-hoc randomized evidence to suggest beneficial effect of belimumab, administered on top of standard-of-care, during maintenance therapy in lupus nephritis. Type I interferon receptor blockade has yielded promising results in preliminary SLE trials yet data on renal activity are unavailable. Conversely, targeting interleukin-6 and interferon-γ both failed to demonstrate a significant renal effect. For several other targets, preclinical data are encouraging but will require confirmation. We envision that high-throughput technologies will enable accurate patient stratification, thus offering the opportunity for personalized implementation of cytokine-targeting therapies.

Mycophenolate Mofetil versus Cyclophosphamide for Induction Treatment of Lupus Nephritis

Recent studies have suggested that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) may offer advantages over intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVC) for the treatment of lupus nephritis, but these therapies have not been compared in an international randomized, controlled trial. Here, the comparison of MMF and IVC as induction treatment for active lupus nephritis in a multinational, two-phase (induction and maintenance) study was shown in the different study. Lupus nephritis (LN) occurs in up to 60% of adults with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and predicts poor survival. The prevalence of SLE and LN and treatment response vary by age, gender, location, and race/ethnicity; LN is especially common in black and Hispanic patients in the United States. MMF was at least as effective as IVC in induction treatment in previous trials in Hong Kong, Malaysia, China, and the United States. Meta-analyses of these and smaller trials suggested that MMF may offer advantages over IVC, but they have not yet been compared in an international randomized, controlled trial. Many comparative studies were undertaken in patients with LN, a two-part trial to assess the efficacy and safety of MMF as induction therapy and subsequently as maintenance therapy for LN. This article will describe the comparison of MMF with IVC, both with corticosteroids.Anwer Khan Modern Medical College Journal Vol. 9, No. 1: Jan 2018, P 63-67

Pro: The use of calcineurin inhibitors in the treatment of lupus nephritis.

Renal disease in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) carries significant morbidity and mortality. Cyclophosphamide (CYC)- and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)-based induction regimens are not ideal in terms of efficacy and toxicity. The adverse effects of CYC, such as infection risk, infertility, urotoxicity and oncogenicity, limit its use in lupus nephritis. Although MMF is non-inferior to CYC as induction therapy and has reduced gonadal toxicity and oncogenic potential, meta-analyses of clinical trials do not show a lower rate of infective and gastrointestinal complications. Tacrolimus (TAC) has recently been shown to have equal efficacy to either MMF or CYC for inducing remission of lupus nephritis. A low-dose combination of MMF and TAC appears to be more effective than intravenous CYC pulses in Chinese patients, and has potential to replace the more toxic CYC regimens in high-risk subgroups. TAC may be considered as another non-CYC alternative for induction therapy of lupus nephritis and in those with refractory disease or intolerance to CYC or MMF. TAC has no negative effect on fertility in younger women, and unlike MMF and CYC, it is safe in pregnancy. However, TAC has a narrow therapeutic window and drug level monitoring is required to ensure drug exposure and minimize acute toxicities. Current evidence for the efficacy of TAC in lupus nephritis is limited to 6 months and the incidence of renal flare after discontinuation of therapy or switching to azathioprine appears to be higher than other induction agents. Long-term data and the incidence of chronic nephrotoxicity of TAC as maintenance therapy in lupus nephritis are currently lacking and further prospective trials are needed to address these issues.

Con: Cyclophosphamide for the treatment of lupus nephritis.

Kidney involvement is a major determinant for morbidity and mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. The treatment target of lupus renal disease is to induce and maintain remission and to minimize disease or treatment-related comorbidities. Cyclophosphamide (CYC), in conjunction with glucocorticoids, has conventionally been used for the initial treatment of lupus nephritis. However, the major concerns of CYC are its toxicities, such as infertility, urotoxicity and oncogenicity, which are particularly relevant in women of childbearing age. As a result, maintenance therapy of lupus nephritis with an extended course of CYC pulses has largely been replaced by other immunosuppressive agents such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine. Recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated non-inferiority of MMF to pulse CYC as induction therapy of lupus nephritis. Although MMF as induction-maintenance therapy has been increasingly used in lupus nephritis, its efficacy in the long-term preservation of renal function remains to be elucidated. MMF is not necessarily less toxic than CYC. Meta-analyses of clinical trials show similar incidence of infective complications and gastrointestinal adverse events in both MMF- and CYC-based regimens. However, considering the reduction in gonadal toxicity and the risk of oncogenicity, MMF may be used as first-line therapy of lupus nephritis. Tacrolimus (TAC) has recently been shown to be equivalent to either MMF or CYC for inducing remission of lupus nephritis and may be considered as another non-CYC alternative. Combined low-dose MMF and TAC appears to be more effective than CYC pulses in Chinese patients with lupus nephritis and has the potential to replace the more toxic CYC regimens in high-risk patients. Currently, CYC still plays an important role in the management of lupus nephritis patients with impaired or rapidly deteriorating renal function, crescentic glomerulonephritis or as salvage therapy for recalcitrant disease.

The effect of calcineurin inhibitors in the induction and maintenance treatment of lupus nephritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) cyclosporine (CyA) and tacrolimus (TAC) in the induction and maintenance treatment of lupus nephritis (LN). The Cochrane library, PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched and reviewed up to February 2015. Randomized controlled trials were analyzed using RevMan 5.2 software. Ten randomized controlled trials were selected and included in this study according to our inclusion and exclusion criteria, and six were included in the meta-analysis. The analysis results indicated that, in induction treatment, no statistically significant difference was observed in the rates of complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), or response between the CNIs and intravenous cyclophosphamide (ivCYC). However, the rates of adverse events such as infection (RR 0.65, P = 0.04), leukocytopenia (RR 0.32, P = 0.04), and menstruation disorder (RR 0.37, P = 0.01) following the use of the CNIs were remarkably lower than those after ivCYC. No differences in the CR, PR, infection, or leukocytopenia rates were observed between the CNIs and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). In the maintenance treatment period, the relapse rate between the CNIs and azathioprine (AZA) was similar (RR 0.44, P = 0.27), while the leukocytopenia rate was lower with the CNIs (RR 0.26, P = 0.0005). The efficacy of the CNIs CyA and TAC in induction therapy for lupus nephritis is comparable to ivCYC and MMF, and they are much safer than ivCYC. CNI treatment during the maintenance period was also as effective as AZA treatment, with a much lower risk of adverse effects. The CNIs CyA and TAC should be recommended for both induction and maintenance therapy of LN.

Towards new avenues in the management of lupus glomerulonephritis.

Renal involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) carries substantial morbidity and mortality. Conventional immunosuppressive agents (cyclophosphamide and azathioprine) have suboptimal efficacy and substantial toxicity. Mycophenolate mofetil has emerged as an alternative agent for both induction and maintenance therapy in lupus nephritis because of its reduced gonadal toxicity, despite its failure to demonstrate superiority over cyclophosphamide in pivotal studies. The calcineurin inhibitor tacrolimus has equivalent efficacy to cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil for inducing remission of lupus nephritis. Although rituximab has shown promise in refractory lupus nephritis, combining rituximab with mycophenolate mofetil as initial therapy offers no additional benefit. Considerable interethnic variation is evident in the efficacy and tolerability of the various immunosuppressive regimens, which necessitates individualized treatment and comparison of the efficacy of new regimens across different ethnic groups. For example, low-dose combinations of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil seem to be more effective than pulse cyclophosphamide as induction therapy in Chinese patients. The same regimen has also been used successfully to treat refractory proliferative and membranous lupus nephritis in patients of various ethnic groups. Finally, novel serum and urinary biomarkers are being validated for diagnosis, prognostic stratification and early recognition of flares in lupus nephritis.

Mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine for maintenance treatment of lupus nephritis.

To compare the efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with that of azathioprine (AZA) drugs in the maintenance therapy of lupus nephritis (LN) patients, we studied 81 Sudanese patients with LN (32 in Class III, 34 in Class IV, and 15 in combined Class V + IV of the ISN/RPS 2003 Classification). All patients received induction therapy consisting of monthly intravenous pulse doses of cyclophosphamide (CYC) (500 mg/m 2 of body-surface area) for six months, plus three consecutive pulses of intravenous methylprednisolone 15 mg/kg/day of body weight (maximum 500 mg). Subsequently, 41 (50.6%) patients were randomized into a group that received oral MMF (22 mg/kg/day), and 40 (49.4%) patients randomized to a group that received oral AZA (2 mg/kg/day). All patients initially received oral prednisone (1 mg/kg of body weight daily) for four weeks. The baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar. Total remission rate was 75.3% (80.5% in MMF and 70% in AZA), complete remission rate of 54.3% (56.1% with MMF and 52.5% with AZA), and a partial remission rate of 21% (24.4% with MMF and 17.5% with AZA) over 29 months. During maintenance therapy, six patients died (four in the AZA group and two in the MMF group), and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) developed in five patients (three in the AZA group and two in the MMF group). During the 36-months of the study, both groups had comparable event-free survival rate for the composite end point of death or ESRD and rate of relapse-free survival. Furthermore, both groups had no significant differences in terms of frequency of hospitalization, amenorrhea, infection, nausea, and vomiting. We conclude that our study showed that short-term therapy with intravenous CYC followed by maintenance therapy with oral MMF or AZA had similar efficacy and safety for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe LN.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Mycophenolic Acid in Lupus Nephritis: A Review of Current Literature.

In recent years, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)-based immunosuppressive regimen was recommended in induction and in maintenance therapy in lupus nephritis (LN), one of the most severe and common manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus. However, no recommendations were made so far regarding monitoring of mycophenolic acid (MPA) plasma concentrations. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) constitutes a practical tool to ensure optimal posology. In renal transplantation, it was proved that acute allograft rejection incidences decreased when the recommended MPA target exposure has been maintained (30-60 mg·h·L). The results obtained in the field of transplant medicine indicate the potential benefit of carrying out TDM in LN. To date, the correlation of MPA exposure and clinical outcomes in the population of LN patients was the objective of just a few studies. The aim of this review was therefore to present TDM studies in LN patients on MMF therapy and to compare their results. Based on the conclusions drawn from TDM studies in LN, it can be suggested that the area under the concentration-time curve threshold values of 30-45 mg·h·L can potentially be associated with favorable treatment outcome. Moreover, the majority of the analyzed studies indicate relatively good correlation between trough concentration and the area under the concentration-time curve in patients treated with MMF that constitutes an important implication for TDM approach in routine setting. The threshold of 3 mg/L can potentially be recommended as a target trough value.

Long-term follow-up of the MAINTAIN Nephritis Trial, comparing azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil as maintenance therapy of lupus nephritis

ObjectiveTo report the 10-year follow-up of the MAINTAIN Nephritis Trial comparing azathioprine (AZA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as maintenance therapy of proliferative lupus nephritis, and to test different definitions of...

Optimizing the dose of mycophenolate mofetil for the maintenance treatment of lupus nephritis by therapeutic drug monitoring.

To evaluate the usefulness of monitoring the pharmacokinetic of mycophenolic acid (MPA) in lupus nephritis (LN), in order to optimize the mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) dose in the single patient. Five consecutive patients with active LN were studied. After standard induction therapy with MMF, MMF was titrated to achieve a stable target of MPA-AUC0-12h of 45-60mg.h/l during the maintenance treatment. For MPA assays, blood samples were collected at 0, ½, 1 ¼, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12h after the morning dose. Plasma MPA concentration was measured using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography. Treatment response was evaluated at baseline, i.e. at the end of the induction therapy and during maintenance therapy with MMF. The average whole follow-up was 21.4months. At the last visit, a complete renal response was registered in all the five patients. No renal flares were observed. Glucocorticoids were suspended in all. The mean MPA-AUC0-12h of MMF at the last visit [56.74 (±2.9) mg.h/l] was significantly lower than MPA-AUC0-12h at baseline [98.7 (±24.6) mg.h/l] (p = 0.009), since the dose of MMF was significantly reduced in all the patients [from 2.8g/day (±0.4) to 1.9g/day (±0.4) (p = 0.018)] based on the target MPA-AUC. No severe adverse events were observed. Assessment of MPA pharmacokinetics may be useful to optimize the maintenance therapy of lupus nephritis with MMF, possibly improving the efficacy and minimizing the side effects.

AB0486 The Complete Response in Patients with Lupus Nephritis Treated with Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) as Their First Line Therapy

BackgroundThe optimal therapeutic approach for lupus nephritis (LN) involves an induction phase to achieve remission followed by maintenance therapy to prevent relapses. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has become the primary induction...

Short-interval lower-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide as induction and maintenance therapy for lupus nephritis: a prospective observational study.

Cyclophosphamide (CYC) has long been considered a gold standard in inducing renal remission and preventing renal flares for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, the rational use of CYC has not reached a consensus, such as the timing and length of treatment, the route of administration, and the ideal dosage. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of short-interval lower-dose (SILD) intravenous (IV) CYC in the treatment of SLE. A total of 225 patients with lupus nephritis were randomly assigned to a 1-year trial, either the SILD group (12 fortnightly pulses at a fixed dose of 400 mg followed by 6 monthly pulses) or high-dose (HD) group (6 monthly pulses followed by two quarterly pulses at a dose of 0.5~1.0 g/m(2)). At 6 months of treatment, 28 % (30/107) of patients in the SILD group reached a complete remission (CR), and 51.4 % (55/107) were in partial remission (PR), as compared with 32.7 % (35/107) and 45.8 % (49/107) in the HD group, respectively. Serum albumin, 24-h urinary protein, and the scores of disease activity were significantly improved in both groups at 6 months and maintained at the end of clinical trial. However, the SILD group showed much less menstrual disturbances (11.5 %), gastrointestinal adverse effects (5.3 %), and leukopenia (9.7 %) than the HD group (28.6, 26.8, and 19.8 %, respectively) at the end of clinical trial. The efficacy of the short-interval lower-dose (SILD) IV CYC regimen in the treatment of lupus nephritis is equivalent to that of the high-dose (HD) regimen, whereas the incidence of adverse events is much lower in the SILD group.

Maintenance therapy of lupus nephritis with mycophenolate or azathioprine: systematic review and meta-analysis

The objective of this study was to summarize the comparative efficacy and safety of MMF and AZA as maintenance therapy for LN. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of MMF and AZA as maintenance therapy for LN were performed based on a sensitive search. Meta-regression was used to explore causes of heterogeneity. Safety was explored using crude and combined incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of the more frequent adverse events (AEs). The search produced 7341 hits. Four randomized clinical trials and one long-term study were selected for detailed analysis. No significant differences between MMF and AZA were found in sustained remission, relapse, renal failure, creatinine increase or death. However, there was high heterogeneity in the design of studies, drug doses and treatment in the previous induction phase. Significant lower rates of discontinuation due to AEs occurred in the MMF group, with a relative risk (RR) of 0.60 (95% CI 0.41, 0.88) but significant risk of publication bias (Egger test, P = 0.012). Gastrointestinal manifestations were more common [combined IRR 1.68 (95% CI 1.06, 2.68)] and leucopoenia less frequent in the MMF group [combined IRR 0.14 (95% CI 0.05, 0.42)]. The available data does not support the superiority of MMF or AZA as maintenance therapy for LN. Nevertheless, the high heterogeneity of studies included in the analysis makes this contention questionable.