Maintenance Therapy In Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Research Articles

Survival outcomes of alternate dosing schedule of pemetrexed as maintenance therapy in NSCLC: Single institution experience

BackgroundMaintenance therapy with pemetrexed has shown survival benefit in patients with advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The recommended dose schedule is 500 mg/m 2 in 21-day cycles. Prolonged treatment with maintenance pemetrexed can result in cumulative toxicities. We sought to compare treatment outcomes in patients receiving an alternate maintenance schedule in realworld practice. MethodsThis single-center, retrospective study investigated patients with advanced stage (IIIB and IV) NSCLC receiving at least two doses of maintenance pemetrexed from May 1, 2011 to June 30, 2016. The objective was to compare time on treatment with maintenance pemetrexed therapy initiated at a standard schedule (q3 weeks) versus an alternate schedule (q4 weeks or longer). Also evaluated were progressionfree survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) differences between the two groups. Results129 patients were included, of whom 40 started the alternate schedule no later than cycle 3 of treatment (29 of 40 patients initiated maintenance treatment on the alternate schedule). Average time on maintenance treatment for patients appeared to be longer in the patients who received the alternate schedule regimen (195 vs 263 days, p =0.008). OS trended towards better survival among patients receiving the alternate schedule regimen (11.9 vs 18.1 months, p =0.3). Limiting the analysis to ALK wildtype, the patients showed a similar trend, with median PFS (7.6 vs 11.5 months, p =0.46) and OS (11.9 vs 17.6 months, p =0.38), still favoring the alternate schedule. ConclusionsThe alternate dosing schedule of maintenance pemetrexed (q4 weeks or longer) is feasible and not detrimental to OS. Future investigations evaluating the optimal administration schedule of maintenance pemetrexed is warranted.

Do we Need Maintenance Chemotherapy in Advanced NSCLC in the Era of Immune and Targeted Therapy?

Background: Although well established for the effective management of hematologic cancers, maintenance chemotherapy has only been recently incorportated as a treatment paradigm for advanced non–small-cell lung cancer. Maintenance chemotherapy aims to prolong a clinically favorable response state achieved after finishing induction therapy which is usually predefined in number before startng treatment. There are 2 modalities for maintenance therapy; continuation maintenance (involving a non-platinum component which was a part of the induction protocol or a targeted agent) and switch maintenance therapy (utilizing a new agent which was not a part of the induction regimen). Methods: The purpose of this article is to review the role of maintenance therapy in the treatment of advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and provide a brief overview about induction chemotherapy in NSCLC to address the basis of maintenance therapy as a treatment option. We will also compare the impact of maintenance chemotherapy with the now evolving role of immunotherapy in NSCLC. Results: There have been 4 maintenance studies to date showing prolonged PFS and OS with statistical significance. However, Three out of the four studies (ECOG4599, JMEN, and PARAMOUNT) did not report tumor molecular analysis. As regard Immunotherapy, current data is in favour of strongly an increasing role for immunotherapy in NSCLC. Conclusion: Maintenance therapy in NSCLC continues to be an important therapeutic line to improve outcome in patients with metastatic and recurrent disease.

Maintenance therapy in NSCLC

The current gold standard of care for first-line therapy in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, which is recommended for a maximum of six cycles. Since the prolongation of the first-line regimen does not translate into improved survival, and most patients experience progression within 3–4 months after first-line therapy, new treatment strategies have been explored to delay disease progression and prolong survival. Maintenance therapy has been proposed as either continuation maintenance with one part of the induction treatment or as switch maintenance with a different agent not used in first-line therapy. There is an accumulating body of evidence that both strategies administered immediately after induction therapy could improve survival in patients with good performance status. In this review, recent results of pivotal studies are summarized, since some studies have shown impressive benefits in terms of survival and their strategy should be considered as a new treatment option in selected patients.

Maintenance therapy of gefitinib for non-small-cell lung cancer after first-line chemotherapy regardless of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation: a review in Chinese patients

Purpose:Gefitinib is a well known therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this study was to review clinical reports of gefitinib as maintenance therapy after first-line chemotherapy regardless of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, and assess its efficacy and safety in Chinese patients.Materials and methods:Systematic computerized searches of the following databases were conducted from the start of each database up to July 2012; these include Medline, EMBASE, CNKI and www.clinicaltrials.gov. Terms searched include ‘non-small-cell lung cancer’, ‘NSCLC’, ‘lung cancer’, ‘lung tumor’, ‘gefitinib’, ‘Iressa’, ‘EGFR’ and ‘epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors’. A total of 22 studies were reviewed.Results:In general, the overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and one year survival (OYS) of gefitinib maintenance therapy were 30.89%, 67.5% and 50.6% respectively, in addition, the median overall survival (OS) and median progression free survival (PFS) were 13.09 and 7.88 months respectively. Moreover, ORR, DCR, median survival time (MST) and PFS of female, nonsmoking, lung adenocarcinoma (LAC) patients and patients with rash had higher performance than male, smoking, non-LAC patients and patients without rash (p < 0.05). The adverse events (AEs) were mainly skin rashes and diarrhea, most of which were grades 1 or 2 and were well tolerated.Conclusion:Gefitinib produced encouraging efficacy, safety and survival when delivered as maintenance therapy for NSCLC in Chinese patients after first-line chemotherapy regardless of EGFR mutation, especially for the patients who were female, non-smokers, LAC and with rash. Key limitations of this review include limited subgroup data, small sample sizes, and the lack of EGFR/KRAS data.

Successful Treatment of Solitary Bone Metastasis of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Bevacizumab and Hyperthermia

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents 85 % of all malignant lung cancers. In metastatic disease the principle goal of palliative therapy is to prolong survival with least toxicity and best patients' quality of life. Bevacizumab (BEV) has been approved as first line treatment in combination with platinum based chemotherapy and maintenance therapy in NSCLC. BEV can be added safely to several chemotherapeutic agents, however there is no data on coadministration with thermotherapy. Even in localized disease no robust evidence exists about the beneficial effect of loco-regional thermotherapy on overall survival, but it might be used successfully in symptom palliation. In this article a successful co-administration of BEV and hyperthermia is reported in a patient with monolocalized bone metastasis from previously operated NSCLC. This case suggests that electrohyperthermia can probably be incorporated in palliative therapy added not only to radiotherapy or chemotherapy but also to anti-angiogenic BEV treatment.

EGFR TKIs as maintenance therapy in NSCLC: Finding the old in the new INFORMation.

Data from phase III studies indicate that a consistent proportion of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with front-line chemotherapy, at the time of progression, are not able to receive additional therapies mainly because of worsening clinical conditions related to a rapid tumor growth (1,2). An important clinical end-point, particularly for patients with aggressive tumors, is to guarantee that the vast majority of patients could be treated with drugs that, in second-line setting, demonstrated to prolong survival, preserving quality of life and delaying disease-related symptoms. Beyond any semantic questions about the type of agent employed (i.e. continuation maintenance versus switch maintenance), the use of an effective drug in the absence of disease progression following platinum-based chemotherapy means maintenance therapy. During the last few years, several studies (1-4) have been conducted in metastatic NSCLC to assess the role of maintenance therapy.

The effectiveness of maintenance pharmacotherapies for non-small cell lung cancer.

Although current recommendations for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) include a maximum of six cycles of platinum-based combination therapy as a first-line approach, most patients experience progression within 3–4 months. Therefore, a new treatment strategy, maintenance therapy, has been proposed, and several large randomized prospective controlled trials have shown benefits with maintenance therapy. Maintenance therapy can be classified as either continuation maintenance, which is defined as a prolongation of a part of the first-line chemotherapy or molecularly targeted agent until progression, or switch-maintenance, which is defined as the administration of a different cytotoxic chemotherapy or molecularly targeted agent immediately after induction therapy. In this article, recent results from large randomized phase III trials regarding maintenance therapy are reviewed in order to evaluate the role of maintenance therapy in NSCLC.

Maintenance Therapy for NSCLC: Consensus and Controversy.

Nowadays, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still an incurable disease. However, recent researches on maintenance therapy have led to considerable progress. Recently, pemetrexed and erlotinib have been approved for maintenance chemotherapy by both the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency. However, there are not adequate data to support the maintenance therapy as the standard treatment for advanced NSCLC and there has been no conclusive predictor of who will get benefit from maintenance chemotherapy and what type of maintenance, continuation or switch, is preferred. This article reviews the main studies on maintenance therapy of advanced NSCLC and discusses the results available to date.

Maintenance therapy in NSCLC: why? To whom? Which agent?

Maintenance therapy is emerging as a treatment strategy in the management of advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Initial trials addressing the question of duration of combination chemotherapy failed to show any overall survival benefit for the prolonged administration over a fixed number of cycles with an increased risk for cumulative toxicity. Nowadays several agents with different ways of administration and a different pattern of toxicity have been formally investigated in the maintenance setting. Maintenance strategies include continuing with an agent already present in the induction regimen or switching to a different one. Taking into consideration that no comparative trials of maintenance with different chemotherapy drugs or targeted agents have been conducted, the choice and the duration of maintenance agents is largely empirical. Furthermore, it is still unknown and it remains an open question if this approach needs to be proposed to every patient in the case of partial/complete response or stable disease after the induction therapy. Here, we critically review available data on maintenance treatment, discussing the possibility to tailor the right treatment to the right patient, in an attempt to optimize costs and benefits of an ever-growing panel of different treatment options.

Shifting the paradigm for maintenance therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

The standard of care in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is to treat patients with a platinum doublet for 4 to 6 cycles and to offer second-line therapy upon progression. Maintenance therapy in NSCLC is defined as a therapeutic agent which is administered after first-line chemotherapy is complete, but before the disease progresses. While maintenance therapy is not yet universally accepted as a therapeutic approach, emerging data have demonstrated its potential to improve progression-free survival and overall survival in a clinically significant way. In this article a concise recent review of data related to the role of maintenance therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC is provided, complementing previous information in the field. It is recommended that NSCLC patients are offered maintenance therapy after first-line therapy is complete.

Maintenance Therapy in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer death in the industrialized world, and survival rates for advanced disease remain low with standard platinum-based chemotherapy. One treatment strategy that has been investigated extensively in NSCLC is that of "maintenance" therapy. Options for maintenance include maintaining response to initial therapy by continuing the initial combination chemotherapy regimen, continuing only single agent chemotherapy, or by introducing a new agent. Treatments that have been studied in randomized trials to date include chemotherapy, molecularly targeted agents, and immunotherapy approaches. After the development of multiple new agents that show activity in NSCLC and have a tolerable side effect profile, there has been increasing interest recently in this treatment strategy. In this study, we examine the evolution of this strategy by reviewing trials investigating the main treatment paradigms used in maintenance therapy for NSCLC.