Maintenance Therapy In Patients Research Articles

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib as maintenance therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer achieving SD post first-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy.

Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a significant clinical challenge, particularly in patients who exhibit stable disease (SD) following first-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Anlotinib, a novel multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, as maintenance therapy in this patient cohort. This retrospective, single-center study enrolled patients with advanced NSCLC who showed SD after receiving a combination of first-line chemo-immunotherapy for 4 cycles, then add anlotinib to subsequent standard maintenance therapy, continuing treatment until disease progression or the occurrence of intolerable toxic side effects. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (P FS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety profile. A total of 52 patients were enrolled, the median P FS and OS was 5.0m and 10.0m, respectively. The ORR and DCR was 28.85% and 67.31%. subgroup analysis indicated that its efficacy correlate with certain Adverse Effects (AEs, such as hypertension, proteinuria, and hand-foot syndrome). Further mechanistic analysis suggests that this regimen may likely reduce immune suppression by depleting Tregs, thereby further activating the immune system to exert synergistic anti-tumor effects. Besides promising efficacy, the toxicity can be tolerated. Anlotinib demonstrates promising efficacy as a maintenance therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC who have achieved SD following first-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy. The manageable safety profile and the observed extension in P FS and OS suggest that Anlotinib could be a valuable therapeutic option for this challenging patient population. Further large-scale randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these findings and to optimize patient selection and management strategies.

Maintenance with mirvetuximab soravtansine plus bevacizumab vs bevacizumab in FRα-high platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.

At first recurrence, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (PSOC) is frequently treated with platinum-based chemotherapy doublets plus bevacizumab, then single-agent bevacizumab. Most patients' disease progresses within a year after chemotherapy, emphasizing the need for novel strategies. Mirvetuximab soravtansine-gynx (MIRV), an antibody-drug conjugate, comprises a folate receptor alpha (FRα)-binding antibody and tubulin-targeting payload (maytansinoid DM4). In FRα-high PSOC, MIRV plusbevacizumab previously showed promising efficacy (objective response rate, 69% [95% CI: 41-89]; median progression-free survival, 13.3months [95% CI: 8.3-18.3]; median duration of response, 12.9months [95% CI: 6.5-15.7]) and safety. The Phase III randomized GLORIOSA trial will evaluate MIRV plusbevacizumab vs. bevacizumab alone as maintenance therapy in patients with FRα-high PSOC who did not have disease progression following second-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy plus bevacizumab.Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05445778; GOG.org ID: GOG-3078; ENGOT.ESGO.org ID: ENGOT-ov76.

Efficacy and safety of maintenance therapy with anlotinib for advanced cholangiocarcinoma after first-line chemotherapy and the variations in efficacy based on different neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)

ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of anlotinib as maintenance therapy in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma following first-line chemotherapy.MethodsThis retrospective study enrolled 154 patients with advanced biliary tract cancer admitted to the hospital between January 2020 and December 2022. All patients received first-line intravenous chemotherapy with gemcitabine combined with cisplatin, oxaliplatin, or tegafur. Among the 106 patients who achieved disease control, 47 received oral anlotinib hydrochloride (12 mg daily, 2 weeks on/1 week off) as maintenance therapy. Clinical efficacy, including ORR, DCR, DOR, PFS, and OS, was compared between the anlotinib maintenance and non-maintenance groups. Subgroup analysis based on NLR levels was also performed.ResultsAmong the 47 anlotinib maintenance patients, the ORR was 21.28% and the DCR was 51.06%. The median DOR was 36 weeks, and the median PFS was 43 weeks in the anlotinib group, versus 28 weeks and 38 weeks in the non-maintenance group, respectively. The median OS was not reached in the anlotinib group but was 48 weeks in the non-maintenance group. Patients receiving anlotinib maintenance had significantly longer DOR, PFS, and OS (all p < 0.05). Patients with low NLR levels had better survival benefits from anlotinib.ConclusionMaintenance therapy with anlotinib demonstrates potential efficacy and a reliable safety profile in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma following first-line treatment. The efficacy of anlotinib therapy appears to be influenced by NLR levels. Further validation with larger sample sizes is warranted to strengthen the robustness and reliability of the results.

Risankizumab for Ulcerative Colitis

The clinical effects of risankizumab (a monoclonal antibody that selectively targets the p19 subunit of IL-23) for the treatment of ulcerative colitis are unknown. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of risankizumab when administered as an induction and a maintenance therapy for patients with ulcerative colitis. Two phase 3 randomized clinical trials were conducted. The induction trial was conducted at 261 clinical centers (in 41 countries) and enrolled 977 patients from November 5, 2020, to August 4, 2022 (final follow-up on May 16, 2023). The maintenance trial was conducted at 238 clinical centers (in 37 countries) and enrolled 754 patients from August 28, 2018, to March 30, 2022 (final follow-up on April 11, 2023). Eligible patients had moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis; a history of intolerance or inadequate response to 1 or more conventional therapies, advanced therapies, or both types of therapies; and no prior exposure to risankizumab. For the induction trial, patients were randomized 2:1 to receive 1200 mg of risankizumab or placebo administered intravenously at weeks 0, 4, and 8. For the maintenance trial, patients with a clinical response (determined using the adapted Mayo score) after intravenous treatment with risankizumab were randomized 1:1:1 to receive subcutaneous treatment with 180 mg or 360 mg of risankizumab or placebo (no longer receiving risankizumab) every 8 weeks for 52 weeks. The primary outcome was clinical remission (stool frequency score ≤1 and not greater than baseline, rectal bleeding score of 0, and endoscopic subscore ≤1 without friability) at week 12 for the induction trial and at week 52 for the maintenance trial. Among the 975 patients analyzed in the induction trial (aged 42.1 [SD, 13.8] years; 586/973 [60.1%] were male; and 677 [69.6%] were White), the clinical remission rates at week 12 were 132/650 (20.3%) for 1200 mg of risankizumab and 20/325 (6.2%) for placebo (adjusted between-group difference, 14.0% [95% CI, 10.0%-18.0%], P < .001). Among the 548 patients analyzed in the maintenance trial (aged 40.9 [SD, 14.0] years; 313 [57.1%] were male; and 407 [74.3%] were White), the clinical remission rates at week 52 were 72/179 (40.2%) for 180 mg of risankizumab, 70/186 (37.6%) for 360 mg of risankizumab, and 46/183 (25.1%) for placebo (adjusted between-group difference for 180 mg of risankizumab vs placebo, 16.3% [97.5% CI, 6.1%-26.6%], P < .001; adjusted between-group difference for 360 mg of risankizumab vs placebo, 14.2% [97.5% CI, 4.0%-24.5%], P = .002). No adverse event signals were detected in the treatment groups. Compared with placebo, risankizumab improved clinical remission rates in an induction trial and in a maintenance trial for patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. Further study is needed to identify benefits beyond the 52-week follow-up. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT03398148 and NCT03398135.

Real-life experiences of switching from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab maintenance therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

A few prospective cohort studies support the safety of switching from intravenous to subcutaneous administration of vedolizumab during maintenance therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Real-life data on switching after intravenous induction therapy are lacking. The aim was to obtain real-world data on subcutaneous vedolizumab treatment in patients with inflammatory bowel disease after switching from intravenous vedolizumab induction or maintenance therapy, and to evaluate treatment persistence, safety, and changes in disease activity and serum vedolizumab concentrations. We performed a retrospective registry-based study of inflammatory bowel disease patients who received subcutaneous vedolizumab therapy in two tertiary centres. Altogether, 103 patients (26 Crohn's disease and 77 ulcerative colitis) switching from intravenous maintenance therapy (group 1) and 44 patients (14 and 30, respectively) switching from intravenous induction therapy (group 2) were included. At 6 months from baseline, 90.3% of the patients in group 1 and 90.9% of the patients in group 2 continued on subcutaneous vedolizumab. After the switch in group 1, disease activity remained stable. In group 2, clinical disease activity decreased significantly in ulcerative colitis patients (P = 0.002). The median serum vedolizumab concentration was 34.00 µg/ml during subcutaneous maintenance therapy in group 1, which was significantly higher than the median concentration during intravenous therapy (17.00 µg/ml, P < 0.001), but remained unchanged in group 2 after the switch (31.50 µg/ml). Based on these data, subcutaneous vedolizumab treatment is well-tolerated and the treatment persistence remains high after switching from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab therapy.

Osimertinib efficacious as maintenance therapy in patients with stage III NSCLC.

Osimertinib efficacious as maintenance therapy in patients with stage III NSCLC.

Dendritic cells loaded with allogeneic tumour cell lysate plus best supportive care versus best supportive care alone in patients with pleural mesothelioma as maintenance therapy after chemotherapy (DENIM): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2/3 study

Dendritic cell immunotherapy has proven to be safe and induces an immune response in humans. We aimed to establish the efficacy of dendritic cells loaded with allogeneic tumour cell lysate (MesoPher, Amphera BV, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands) as maintenance therapy in patients with pleural mesothelioma. In this open-label, randomised, phase 2/3 study, patients with histologically confirmed unresectable pleural mesothelioma, aged 18 years or older, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-1, and non-progressing disease after four to six cycles of standard chemotherapy (with pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 plus platinum [cisplatin 75 mg/m2 or carboplatin area under the curve of 5]) were recruited from four centres in Belgium, France, and The Netherlands. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1), using block randomisation (block size of 4), stratified by centre and histology (epithelioid vs other), to MesoPher treatment plus best supportive care or best supportive care alone. Patients received up to a maximum of five MesoPher infusions, with treatment administered on days 1, 15, and 29, and weeks 18 and 30. At each timepoint, participants received an injection of 25 × 106 dendritic cells (two-thirds of the dendritic cells were administered intravenously and a third were injected intradermally). Best supportive care was per local institutional standards. The primary endpoint was overall survival, assessed in all participants randomly assigned to treatment (full analysis set) and safety assessed in all randomly assigned participants, and who underwent leukapheresis if they were in the MesoPher group. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03610360, and is closed for accrual. Between June 21, 2018, and June 10, 2021, 176 patients were screened and randomly assigned to the MesoPher group (n=88) or best supportive care alone group (n=88). One participant in the MesoPher group did not undergo leukapheresis. Mean age was 68 years (SD 8), 149 (85%) of 176 were male, 27 (15%) were female, 173 (98%) were White, two were Asian (1%), and one (1%) was other race. As of data cutoff (June 24, 2023), after a median follow up of 15·1 months (IQR 9·5-22·4), median overall survival was 16·8 months (95% CI 12·4-20·3; 61 [69%] of 88 died) in the MesoPher group and 18·3 months (14·3-21·9; 59 [67%] of 88 died) in the best supportive care group (hazard ratio 1·10 [95% CI 0·77-1·57]; log-rank p=0·62). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events were chest pain (three [3%] of 87 in the MesoPher group vs two [2%] of 88 in the best supportive care group), dyspnoea (none vs two [2%]), anaemia (two [2%] vs none), nausea (none vs two [2%]), and pneumonia (none vs two [2%]). No deaths due to treatment-emergent adverse events were recorded. Treatment-related adverse events consisted of infusion-related reactions (fever, chills, and fatigue), which occurred in 64 (74%) of 87 patients in the MesoPher group, and injection-site reactions (itch, erythema, and induration), which occurred in 73 (84%) patients, and all were grade 1-2 in severity. No deaths were determined to be treatment related. MesoPher did not show improvement in overall survival in patients with pleural mesothelioma. Immune checkpoint therapy is now standard of care in pleural mesothelioma. Further randomised studies are needed of combinations of MesoPher and immune checkpoint therapy, which might increase efficacy without adding major toxicities. Amphera BV and EU HORIZON.

Study on the efficacy and toxicity of pamiparib combined with tamoxifen in the treatment of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer with biochemical recurrence during first-line PARPi maintenance therapy.

TPS5621 Background: A high proportion of ovarian cancer patients tend to have elevated CA-125 1-6 months before imaging recurrence. The time between biochemical recurrence (i.e., only elevated CA-125 without imaging finding or clinical symptoms) to imaging recurrence can be considered a "window period", and if the “window period” can be extended, it may convert platinum-resistant relapsed patients to platinum-sensitive patients, and ultimately improving patient outcomes. The timing of treatment for the biochemical recurrent patients has been controversial. Tamoxifen, an anti-estrogenic drug, is considered an effective option for these patients. Pamiparib (BGB-290) is an investigational small molecule inhibitor of PARP1 and PARP2. According to OReO study(NCT03106987), the "PARPi after PARPi" strategy is effective in recurrent ovarian cancer patients previously treated with a PARP inhibitor. Therefore, we aim to further explore the use of PARP inhibitors in maintenance therapy for patients with ovarian cancer. Methods: This study (NCT05669768) will evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of pamiparib and tamoxifen in ovarian cancer patients with biochemical recurrence during first-line PARPi maintenance therapy. The included ovarian cancer patients are required to achieve No Evidence of Disease (NED) or demonstrated a response following platinum-based chemotherapy, with normalized CA-125 levels. First-line maintenance treatment with a PARP inhibitor is mandatory, with a minimum interval of ≥6 months to biochemical recurrence. The trial design is interventional, employing a Simon two-stage design to estimate sample size. The primary outcome of the study is the CA-125 response rate, which was assessed according to the GCIG criteria.1 The secondary outcome was Time to First Subsequent Therapy (TFST). Patients undergo regular assessments for tumor markers and imaging throughout treatment. If persistent elevation of tumor markers or the detection of recurrent lesions or distant metastases is observed, the patient is promptly removed from the study group. Standardized antitumor therapy is then initiated based on the patient's condition. The total planned enrollment is 46 participants, utilizing a single-group assignment and an open-label design. 1 of planned 12 patients for the first stage of accrual have been enrolled. Reference: 1. Rustin GJ, Vergote I, Eisenhauer E, et al. Definitions for response and progression in ovarian cancer clinical trials incorporating RECIST 1.1 and CA 125 agreed by the Gynecological Cancer Intergroup (GCIG). Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011;21(2):419-423. Clinical trial information: NCT05669768 .

SOGUG-AVELUMAB_RWD: Comprehensive analysis of real-word data to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of avelumab maintenance therapy in patients with stage IV urothelial carcinoma conducted in Spain.

SOGUG-AVELUMAB_RWD: Comprehensive analysis of real-word data to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of avelumab maintenance therapy in patients with stage IV urothelial carcinoma conducted in Spain.

A post-hoc analysis of outcomes of patients with acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) who received oral azacitidine (Oral-AZA) maintenance therapy in the QUAZAR AML-001 study.

6522 Background: AML-MRC represents 25%–34% of all AML cases, and patients with this AML subtype generally have poor outcomes. In this subanalysis of the QUAZAR AML-001study, we report outcomes of patients with AML-MRC who received Oral-AZA vs placebo (PBO). Methods: QUAZAR AML-001 was a phase 3 study of Oral-AZA maintenance therapy in patients with AML in first remission after intensive chemotherapy who were not eligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Patients ≥ 55 years of age with AML and intermediate- or poor-risk cytogenetics received Oral-AZA 300 mg or PBO QD for 14 d per 28-d cycles. In this analysis, WHO 2008 criteria were used to identify patients with secondary AML and/or patients with AML-MRC (both groups are referred to as AML-MRC in this analysis). Data on mutational profiles at diagnosis were not available. Overall survival (OS) from time of randomization to time of death from any cause after censoring for HSCT, and relapse-free survival (RFS) from time of randomization, were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Duration of measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity achieved on treatment was calculated from the first MRD-negative assessment. Results: Overall, 101/472 patients had AML-MRC; 56/238 (23.5%) patients in the Oral-AZA arm and 45/234 (19.2%) patients in the PBO arm. Karyotype/cytogenetics data at diagnosis were available for 87/101 (86.1%) patients with AML-MRC and 331/371 (89.2%) patients with non-AML-MRC. A greater proportion of AML-MRC than non-AML-MRC patients had poor-risk cytogenetics (20/101 [19.8%] vs 46/371 [12.4%]), del(5q) (10/87 [11.5%] vs 9/331 [2.7%]), and monosomy 7/del(7q) (9/87 [10.3%] vs 14/331 [4.2%]). Median OS did not significantly differ in patients with AML-MRC vs non-AML-MRC in either treatment arm (Oral-AZA: 19.9 mo vs 25.1 mo, P = 0.2694; PBO: 14.8 mo vs 14.9 mo, P = 0.2099). In both treatment arms, the median RFS was inferior for patients with AML-MRC vs non-AML-MRC (Oral-AZA 7.5 mo vs 10.5 mo, P = 0.0430; PBO: 3.7 mo vs 4.9 mo, P = 0.0109). Oral-AZA significantly prolonged median OS and RFS, and the duration of MRD negativity for patients with AML-MRC compared with PBO (Table). Conclusions: Oral-AZA significantly improved OS and RFS compared with PBO for patients with AML-MRC indicating that Oral-AZA maintenance is an effective treatment option for these patients with particularly poor prognosis. Clinical trial information: NCT01757535 . [Table: see text]

Exploratory biomarker analysis in the phase III L-MOCA study of olaparib maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer.

The prospective phase III multi-centre L-MOCA trial (NCT03534453) has demonstrated the encouraging efficacy and manageable safety profile of olaparib maintenance therapy in the Asian (mainly Chinese) patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer (PSROC). In this study, we report the preplanned exploratory biomarker analysis of the L-MOCA trial, which investigated the effects of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on olaparib efficacy. HRD status was determined using the ACTHRD assay, an enrichment-based targeted next-generation sequencing assay. PD-L1 expression was assessed by SP263 immunohistochemistry assay. PD-L1 expression positivity was defined by the PD-L1 expression on ≥ 1% of immune cells. Kaplan-Meier method was utilised to analyse progression-free survival (PFS). This exploratory biomarker analysis included 225 patients and tested HRD status [N = 190; positive, N = 125 (65.8%)], PD-L1 expression [N = 196; positive, N = 56 (28.6%)], and BRCA1/2 mutation status (N = 219). The HRD-positive patients displayed greater median PFS than the HRD-negative patients [17.9 months (95% CI: 14.5-22.1) versus 9.2 months (95% CI: 7.5-13.8)]. PD-L1 was predominantly expressed on immune cells. Positive PD-L1 expression on immune cells was associated with shortened median PFS in the patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations [14.5 months (95% CI: 7.4-18.2) versus 22.2 months (95% CI: 18.3-NA)]. Conversely, positive PD-L1 expression on immune cells wasassociated with prolonged median PFS in the patients with wild-type BRCA1/2 [20.9 months (95% CI: 13.9-NA) versus 8.3 months (95% CI: 6.7-13.8)]. HRD remained an effective biomarker for enhanced olaparib efficacy in the Asian patients with PSROC. Positive PD-L1 expression was associated with decreased olaparib efficacy in the patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations but associated with improved olaparib efficacy in the patients with wild-type BRCA1/2. NCT03534453. Registered at May 23, 2018.

International Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Durvalumab in Stage III Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Standard of care for unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) involves definitive chemoradiotherapy followed by maintenance therapy with durvalumab. However, the cost of durvalumab has been cited as a barrier to its use in various health systems. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of durvalumab vs placebo as maintenance therapy in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC from 4 international payer perspectives (US, Brazil, Singapore, and Spain). In this economic evaluation, a Markov model was designed to compare the lifetime cost-effectiveness of maintenance durvalumab for unresectable stage III NSCLC with that of placebo, using 5-year outcomes data from the PACIFIC randomized placebo-controlled trial. Individual patient data were extracted from the PACIFIC, KEYNOTE-189, ADAURA, ALEX, and REVEL randomized clinical trials to develop a decision-analytic model to determine the cost-effectiveness of durvalumab compared with placebo maintenance therapy over a 10-year time horizon. Direct costs, adverse events, and patient characteristics were based on country-specific payer perspectives and demographic characteristics. The study was conducted from June 1, 2022, through December 27, 2023. Life-years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), lifetime costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated at country-specific willingness-to-pay thresholds ([data reported in US$] US: $150 000 per QALY; Brazil: $22 251 per QALY; Singapore: $55 288 per QALY, and Spain: $107 069 per QALY). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to account for parameters of uncertainty. A cost-threshold analysis was also performed. The US base-case model found that treatment with durvalumab was associated with an increased cost of $114 394 and improved effectiveness of 0.50 QALYs compared with placebo, leading to an ICER of $228 788 per QALY. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, according to base-case models, were $141 146 for Brazil, $153 461 for Singapore, and $125 193 for Spain. Durvalumab price adjustments to the PACIFIC data improved cost-effectiveness in Singapore, with an ICER of $45 164. The model was most sensitive to the utility of durvalumab. In this cost-effectiveness analysis of durvalumab as maintenance therapy for unresectable stage III NSCLC, the therapy was found to be cost-prohibitive from the perspective of various international payers according to country-specific willingness-to-pay thresholds per QALY. The findings of the study suggest that discounted durvalumab acquisition costs, as possible in Singapore, might improve cost-effectiveness globally.

Subcutaneous Infliximab (CT-P13 SC) as Maintenance Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Two Randomized Phase 3 Trials (LIBERTY)

Background and AimsCT-P13 subcutaneous (SC), an SC formulation of the intravenous (IV) infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 IV, creates a unique exposure profile. We aimed to demonstrate superiority of CT-P13 SC versus placebo as maintenance therapy in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). MethodsTwo randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies were conducted in patients with moderately-to-severely active CD or UC and inadequate response/intolerance to corticosteroids and immunomodulators. All patients received open-label CT-P13 IV 5 mg/kg at weeks (W) 0, 2, and 6. At W10, clinical responders were randomized (2:1) to CT-P13 SC 120 mg or placebo every 2 weeks until W54 (maintenance phase) using pre-filled syringes. (Co-)primary endpoints were clinical remission and endoscopic response (CD) and clinical remission (UC) at W54 (all-randomized population). ResultsOverall, 396 patients with CD and 548 patients with UC received induction treatment. At W54 in the CD study, statistically significant higher proportions of CT-P13 SC- versus placebo-treated patients achieved clinical remission (62.3% versus 32.1%; P < 0.0001) and endoscopic response (51.1% versus 17.9%; P < 0.0001). In the UC study, clinical remission rates at W54 were statistically significantly higher with CT-P13 SC versus placebo (43.2% versus 20.8%; P < 0.0001). Achievement of key secondary endpoints was significantly higher with CT-P13 SC versus placebo across both studies. CT-P13 SC was well tolerated, with no new safety signals identified. ConclusionCT-P13 SC was more effective than placebo as maintenance therapy and well tolerated in patients with moderately-to-severely active CD or UC who responded to CT-P13 IV induction. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03945019 (CD) and NCT04205643 (UC).

Risankizumab Concentration but not IL-22 Levels are Associated With Clinical and Biochemical Remission in Patients With Crohn’s Disease

Risankizumab (RZB) is a monoclonal antibody that targets the p19 subunit of interleukin (IL)-23.1 The ADVANCE and MOTIVATE randomized controlled trials (RCTs)2 demonstrated that intravenous (IV) RZB compared with placebo led to higher rates of clinical remission and endoscopic response at week 12 in patients with active Crohn's disease (CD).2 The phase III FORTIFY RCT showed that subcutaneous (SC) RZB was significantly more effective than placebo for achieving clinical remission and endoscopic response as maintenance therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe active CD.3.

Targeted and immunotherapy for the management of advanced urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. The activity of targeted and immunotherapy for the management of advanced bladder cancer is reviewed. Platinum-based chemotherapy is standard first-line treatment for advanced bladder cancer. Pembrolizumab is approved alone as first-line therapy for patients who are ineligible for any platinum-based chemotherapy and with enfortumab for patients ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Avelumab is approved for maintenance therapy in patients who have not progressed with first-line platinum-containing therapy. Pembrolizumab, avelumab, and nivolumab are approved second-line therapy in patients who experience progression during or after platinum-containing chemotherapy. Erdafitinib is indicated for advanced disease that has susceptible FGFR2 or FGFR3 genetic alterations and has progressed during or after treatment with at least one line of platinum-containing chemotherapy. Enfortumab vedotin and sacituzumab govitecan are antibody-drug conjugates. They are both approved for patients who have received anti-PD-L1 or anti-PD-1 therapy and treatment with platinum-containing chemotherapy. Enfortumab is also indicated for patients who are ineligible to receive cisplatin-based therapy and have received one or more prior lines of therapy. Six targeted and immunotherapeutic agents have been approved for patients with advanced urothelial bladder cancer. They all have demonstrated activity in patients for whom disease has progressed during or after platinum-based therapy. Pembrolizumab, with and without enfortumab, has demonstrated first-line activity, and avelumab is a key maintenance therapy after first-line treatment. The results of additional clinical trials should provide evidence to establish the exact role in therapy of each agent in patients with advanced disease.

Olaparib and niraparib as maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed and platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: A single-center study in China.

Poly adenosine-diphosphate-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) have been approved to act as first-line maintenance (FL-M) therapy and as platinum-sensitive recurrent maintenance (PSR-M) therapy for ovarian cancer in China for >5 years. Herein, we have analyzed the clinical-application characteristics of olaparib and niraparib in ovarian cancer-maintenance therapy in a real-world setting to strengthen our understanding and promote their rational usage. A retrospective chart review identified patients with newly diagnosed or platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer, who received olaparib or niraparib as maintenance therapy at Sichuan Cancer Hospital between August 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021. Patient medical records were reviewed. We grouped and analyzed patients based on the type of PARPi they used (the olaparib group and the niraparib group) and the line of PARPi maintenance therapy (the FL-M setting and the PSR-M setting). The primary endpoint was the 24-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate. In total, 131 patients (olaparib: n=67, 51.1%; niraparib: n=64, 48.9%) were enrolled. Breast cancer susceptibility genes (BRCA) mutations (BRCAm) were significantly less common in the niraparib group than in the olaparib group [9.4% (6/64) vs. 62.7% (42/67), P<0.001], especially in the FL-M setting [10.4% (5/48) vs. 91.4% (32/35), P<0.001]. The 24-month PFS rates in the FL-M and PSR-M settings were 60.4% and 45.7%, respectively. In patients with BRCAm, the 24-month PFS rates in the FL-M and PSR-M settings were 62.2% and 72.7%, respectively. Olaparib and niraparib were effective in patients with ovarian cancer without any new safety signals except for skin pigmentation. In patients with BRCAm, the 24-month PFS of the PARPi used in the PSR-M setting was even higher than that used in the FL-M setting.

Clinical Outcomes and Treatment Patterns in Adults With FLT3-ITDmut+ Acute Myeloid Leukemia Undergoing Allogeneic Hemopoietic Cell Transplantation in the United States and Canada

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) is used to treat patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with internal tandem duplication of the FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 gene (FLT3-ITDmut+). However, the effect of different characteristics on outcomes after transplant is not fully understood. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of patient, disease, and transplant characteristics on clinical outcomes and trends in maintenance therapy for patients with FLT3-ITDmut+ AML who underwent their first alloHCT. This was an observational cohort study of adults ≥18 years who were recipients of human leukocyte antigen identical sibling, haploidentical, 8/8 or 7/8 unrelated, or cord blood donor alloHCT in the United States and Canada between 2014 and 2019. Patient, disease, and transplant characteristics were collected from Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research between 2014 and 2022. Patients enrolled in the MORPHO clinical trial (NCT02997202) were excluded. Clinical outcomes were measured from the time of alloHCT by disease status: first complete remission (CR1), second or greater complete remission (≥CR2), or relapsed/refractory (R/R). The primary endpoints of this study were overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS). Key secondary endpoints included relapse after alloHCT, nonrelapse mortality (NRM), time from diagnosis to complete remission, time from complete remission to alloHCT, and maintenance therapy before and after alloHCT. Univariate analyses were conducted with Gray's test and log-rank test, while multivariable analyses were conducted using Cox proportional hazards models. A total of 3147 eligible patients (CR1, n = 2389; ≥CR2, n = 340; R/R, n = 418) were included. Most patient, disease, and transplant characteristics were similar between different disease statuses. In univariate analyses, disease status of CR1 compared with ≥CR2 or R/R was significantly (P < .001) associated with improved OS and LFS, and decreased probability of relapse; NRM likely differed across cohorts after alloHCT (P = .003). In multivariable analyses, patients with a disease status of ≥CR2 and R/R compared with CR1 had significantly shorter OS (hazard ratio [HR] 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.43 [1.19 to 1.72], P = .0001, and 2.14 [1.88 to 2.44], P < .0001, respectively). Patients with a disease status of CR1 at ≤2.6 months had better LFS compared with ≥CR2 and R/R (HR [95% CI], 2.03 [1.56 to 2.63], P < .0001 and 3.98 [3.07 to 5.17], P < .0001, respectively). Patients with a ≥CR2 or R/R disease status at ≤2.6 months had an increased likelihood of relapse compared with CR1 (HR [95% CI], 2.46 [1.82 to 3.33], P < .0001 and 4.68 [3.46 to 6.34], P < .0001, respectively). Disease status was not significantly associated with NRM. We also identified several additional patient, disease, and transplant characteristics that may have been associated with inferior OS and/or LFS and greater relapse and/or NRM. Maintenance therapy usage after alloHCT increased from 2014 to 2019 primarily due to increased FLT3 inhibitor use. In this largest study to date of patients from the United States and Canada with FLT3-ITDmut+ AML, disease status of CR1 at the time of alloHCT was associated with better clinical outcomes. Additional factors were identified that may also impact clinical outcomes, and in total, have the potential to inform clinical decision-making.

Comparing R-Bendamustine vs. R-CHOP Plus Maintenance Therapy as First-Line Systemic Treatment in Follicular Lymphoma: A Multicenter Retrospective GELTAMO Study.

Rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) and R-bendamustine (R-B) are the most common frontline treatment strategies for advanced-stage follicular lymphoma (FL). After R-CHOP induction therapy, using rituximab for maintenance therapy notably improves outcomes; however, whether this can be achieved by using the same approach after R-B therapy is still being determined. This retrospective analysis compared 476 FL patients from 17 GELTAMO centers who received R-based regimens followed by rituximab maintenance therapy for untreated advanced-stage FL. The complete response rate at the end of induction was higher with R-B and relapses were more frequent with R-CHOP. During induction, cytopenias were significantly more frequent with R-CHOP and so was the use of colony-stimulating factors. During maintenance therapy, R-B showed more neutropenia and infectious toxicity. After a median follow-up of 81 months (95% CI: 77-86), the 6-year rates of progression-free survival (PFS) were 79% (95% CI: 72-86) for R-bendamustine vs. 67% (95% CI: 61-73) for R-CHOP (p = 0.046), and 6-year overall survival (OS) values were 91% (95% CI: 86-96) for R-B vs. 91% (95% CI: 87-94) for R-CHOP (p = 0.49). In conclusion, R-B followed by rituximab maintenance therapy in patients with previously untreated FL resulted in significantly longer PFS than R-CHOP, with older patients also benefiting from this treatment without further toxicity. Adverse events during maintenance were more frequent with R-B without impacting mortality.

Abstract 5261: Immunologic signatures of peripheral blood cells in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer under lenvatinib-pembrolizumab maintenance therapy

Abstract Background: The treatment of pancreatic cancer is limited by chemotherapy toxicities which impacts quality of life. This is a phase 2 clinical trial of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab as maintenance therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. We observed preclinical activity of this combination in pancreatic mouse models. We hypothesize that this combination may address unmet needs to minimize toxicities associated with standard treatments, stimulate anti-tumor T cell immunity, and improve the progression free and overall survival. Exploratory studies aim to characterize immune-related systemic changes in peripheral blood over the course of therapy and to identify global changes in expression of tumor-related genes in needle biopsy samples of liver metastatic lesions. Methods: Multiplex gene expression analysis of unsorted peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) was performed using PanCancer Immune Profiling Panel on NanoString nCounter platform. PBMC samples from pre- through week 32 of treatment were assessed for differential expression of 730 immune profiling genes defining T cell functions and associated immune categories. Results: PBMC immune profiling from 4/5 patients show a distinctive pattern of increased activation of T cells during the first 9 weeks of treatment followed by a sharp inhibition starting at weeks 9-12 after 3-4 cycles of treatment (CD3E, CD247, LCK, TBX1, TCF7, STAT4, IL2RG). Subsequent upregulation of macrophage-derived scavenger, inflammatory, and immunosuppressive gene expression patterns continued for the remainder of treatment (CD14, MSR1, MARCO, CD68, TGFB1, IL10RA). The median PFS of first 10 patients was 21.5 (9-32) weeks. Conclusions: Immunotherapy resistance may be related to rapidly developing terminal differentiation and unresponsiveness of T cells in parallel with upregulation of macrophage-derived inflammatory and immunosuppressive processes. Studies are on-going to prevent inhibition of the T-cells. Citation Format: Vincent Chung, Ferdynand Kos, Edwin Manual, Shannon Dempsey, Don J. Diamond. Immunologic signatures of peripheral blood cells in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer under lenvatinib-pembrolizumab maintenance therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 5261.

Long-Term Safety and Effectiveness of Tacrolimus in Patients With Lupus Nephritis in Japan: 10-Year Analysis of the Real-World TRUST Study.

To assess the long-term safety and effectiveness of tacrolimus as maintenance therapy in patients with lupus nephritis (LN) receiving treatment in real-world clinical settings in Japan. An open-label, noncomparative, observational, prospective postmarketing surveillance study was conducted in 1395 patients with LN receiving maintenance treatment with tacrolimus at 278 medical institutions across Japan over a period of 10 years. Tacrolimus continuation rate and cumulative incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), relapse, progression to renal failure, and progression to dialysis were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Safety data were available for 1355 patients, almost half (49.3%) of whom remained on tacrolimus for the full 10 years of follow-up. A significant reduction in mean (SD) daily oral corticosteroid dose was observed from 16.0 (9.7) mg/day at 4 weeks after initiation of tacrolimus treatment to 7.2 (4.4) mg/day at year 10 (P < 0.001). The most frequently reported serious ADRs were infections (reported for 131 [9.7%] patients). Except for infections, no marked increase in the incidence of any other ADRs was seen over time, including renal impairment, malignant tumors, and cardiac dysfunction. Renal function was generally well maintained over the 10 years of follow-up. At year 10, cumulative rates of relapse, renal failure, and dialysis were 44.5%, 12.2%, and 4.5%, respectively. Tacrolimus was effective and generally well tolerated as maintenance therapy for LN in a large cohort of patients in Japan followed for 10 years, almost half of whom remained on therapy for the entire duration of follow-up. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01410747).