Objective: to analyze intervention with pre-conditioning blood flow restriction, conditioning and bodybuilding inining the muscle strength of muscle groups during the interruption of training. Materials and Methods: 15 volunteers (men and women), with an average age of 25,0 ± 5,75 years, body weight 68,36 ± 10,6 kg and height 163,63 ± 8,8 cm, participated in the study. They were randomized and randomized into three groups: G1) was submitted to BFR has proved to be a more effective method, both pre-conditioning and conditioning, inining FM for longer, with intervals in training, in muscle groups, deltoid and quadriceps. Although, bodybuilding is also an option for this maintenance, but at lower levels than BFR, under two conditions that involve more actions and muscle groups when they are at stronger intensities. Various methods can increase and/or maintain muscle strength, including periods of exercise., with strength training, for eight weeks, on alternating days, and three weekly sessions; G2) to traditional strength training (muscle building), with periods and sessions equal to G1; and G3) to preconditioning ischemic training, with times and sessions equivalent to the previous groups. A database was created in Microsoft Excel to verify the Delta variation. Analysis was carried out in the Jeffrey’s Amazing Statistics Program (JASP), version 0.16.3 0 for Windows, which is used to measure the average, standard deviation, minimum and maximum; verify the normality of data by the Shapiro-Wilk test; and the Variance Analysis. (Anova one way). The adopted significance level was p≤0,05. Results: indicate that the muscle strength for the BFR group in the development exercise (p=0.001) and the size of the effect (η2=0.11) in the extender chair (p =0.044) and, effectively (η2.=0.61). Conclusion: BFR proved to be a more effective method, both pre-conditioning and conditioning, inining FM for longer, with intervals between training in the muscle, deltoid and quadriceps groups.