Main Emergency Department Research Articles

Patient Malnutrition Risk or Number of Initial Nutrition Intervention Categories Can Be Used to Develop Registered Dietitian Nutritionist Staffing Models in the Inpatient Adult and Pediatric Hospital Setting: A Cohort Study

BackgroundMore data are needed to guide evidence-based, inpatient registered dietitian nutritionist (RDN) staffing models. ObjectiveIdentify relationships between: 1) patient malnutrition risk or intervention categories and estimated total RDN care time (“care time”); and 2) care time and emergency department (ED) visits. DesignThis study was a prospective cohort study with data collection via RDN surveys, patient interviews, and medical record review. Participants/settingAdult (n = 550) and pediatric (n = 345) patients enrolled at 32 adult and 27 pediatric US hospitals from August 2019 to January 2023. Main outcome measuresCare time and ED visits within 90 days of hospital discharge were measured. Statistical analysisMultilevel, generalized linear, and negative binomial regression models were used to evaluate relationships between patient characteristics and Box-Cox–transformed care time and the relationship between Box-Cox–transformed care time and total ED visits. ResultsAfter adjusting for patient characteristics, adult patients classified as at malnutrition risk vs not at risk required a mean of 8% (95% CI 5% to 11%) more care time. Pediatric patients at medium or high compared with low malnutrition risk needed a mean of 21% (95% CI 4% to 40%) and 31% (95% CI 12% to 54%) more care time, respectively. Number of initial RDN interventions categories per patient (0 to 1 vs 2 to 3 or 4+) was associated with a mean of 10% (95% CI 7% to 14%) or 8% (95% CI 2% to 15%) more care time for adults and 17% (95% CI 5% to 32%) and 39% (95% CI 21% to 61%) more care time for children, respectively. More estimated total RDN care time was associated with significantly higher incidence rate ratios of ED visits (adults: incidence rate ratio 2.8; 95% CI 1.1 to 7.2; children: incidence rate ratio 1.7; 95% CI 1.02 to 2.8). ConclusionsPatient malnutrition risk or breadth of nutrition interventions required can inform nutrition department staffing. Intervention studies may better define relationships between care time and medical outcomes.

Influence of time-to-diagnosis on time-to-percutaneous coronary intervention for emergency department ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients: Time-to-electrocardiogram matters.

Earlier electrocardiogram (ECG) acquisition for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is associated with earlier percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and better patient outcomes. However, the exact relationship between timely ECG and timely PCI is unclear. We quantified the influence of door-to-ECG (D2E) time on ECG-to-PCI balloon (E2B) intervention in this three-year retrospective cohort study, including patients from 10 geographically diverse emergency departments (EDs) co-located with a PCI center. The study included 576 STEMI patients excluding those with a screening ECG before ED arrival or non-diagnostic initial ED ECG. We used a linear mixed-effects model to evaluate D2E's influence on E2B with piecewise linear terms for D2E times associated with time intervals designated as ED intake (0-10 min), triage (11-30min), and main ED (>30min). We adjusted for demographic and visit characteristics, past medical history, and included ED location as a random effect. The median E2B interval was longer (76vs 68 min, p<0.001) in patients with D2E>10 min than in those with timely D2E. The proportion of patients identified at the intake, triage, and main ED intervals was 65.8%, 24.9%, and 9.7%, respectively. The D2E and E2B association was statistically significant in the triage phase, where a 1-minute change in D2E was associated with a 1.24-minute change in E2B (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-2.05, p=0.003). Reducing D2E is associated with a shorter E2B. Targeting D2E reduction in patients currently diagnosed during triage (11-30 min) may be the greatest opportunity to improve D2B and could enable 24.9% more ED STEMI patients to achieve timely D2E.

The use of a psychiatric overflow unit in a large urban community hospital to improve process outcomes

BackgroundThe United States is experiencing a mental health (MH) crisis with limited resources to meet demands. We established a 5-bed psychiatric overflow unit (POU) within the emergency department (ED) as a care alternative. ObjectiveDetermine the clinical utility and safety of a POU in care delivery to patients in a MH crisis compared to the main ED (controls). MethodsRetrospective study using data from electronic health record/chart review [October 1, 2021–May 31, 2022 (POU established January 2022)] for all ED patients ≥12 years admitted with MH crisis. Per triage nurse, patients for potential hospital admission were POU admitted when medically cleared. Clinical utility definition: ED length of stay (LOS); patient safety definition: return to ED within 72 ​h for same complaint. ResultsPatients (n ​= ​919; POU ​= ​302, main ED ​= ​617) were 61.4% male, mean age 39.7 ​± ​15.6 years, 84.2% ESI 2, 61.7% admitted/transferred, average ED LOS was 932.3 ​± ​804.7 ​min and no returns within 72 ​h. POU had longer ED LOS (1058.7 ​± ​736.5 vs 884.6 ​± ​824.6, P ​< ​0.0001) but no differences among admitted/transferred patients comparing POU vs controls (P ​> ​0.05); Among discharged patients POU compared to main ED had a longer mean ED LOS (819.9 ​± ​779.8 vs 486.4 ​± ​577.3, P ​< ​0.0001); Removal of police escort patients did not change POU ED LOS (P ​< ​0.05). ConclusionsAn ED POU, staffed with behavioral health nurses, had equivocal safety and clinical utility as the main ED potentially providing an alternative care-delivery option when ED space and MH resources are limited.

Emergency Department Length of Stay: A Community Hospital Initiative.

This quality improvement initiative was conducted to determine if a provider in triage and split flow model could decrease the length of stay (LOS) of discharged patients seen in a community hospital emergency department (ED). Extended LOSs within the ED lead to delays in the care of patients, increase the number of patients who leave without being seen by a provider, decrease patient satisfaction, and cause a loss of revenue for health care organizations. Using a provider in triage and a split flow model, where patients can be seen and dispositioned without delays, can improve ED throughput and decrease the overall LOS. Through a structured, interdisciplinary approach using the Plan-Do-Study-Act Shewhart Cycle of Process Improvement, a provider was placed in triage, and an interior waiting room was used to evaluate emergency severity index level 3 and 4 patients to expedite diagnostic testing and perform procedures. This model allowed lower acuity patients to be cared for separately from higher acuity patients, who were being treated in the main ED. In addition, the median arrival to provider, arrival to bed, and LOS from arrival to departure of discharged patients were compared to the current departmental processes. There was a significant improvement in the LOS of discharged patients and the time of arrival to triage, arrival to bed, and arrival to provider using a provider in triage and a split flow model compared to the current intake. Implementation of a provider in triage and a split flow model can demonstrate a decrease in the LOS of discharged patients along with other ED metrics and improve efficiencies in patient care within a community hospital.

Differences in Telemedicine, Emergency Department, and Hospital Utilization Among Nonelderly Adults with Limited English Proficiency Post-COVID-19 Pandemic: a Cross-Sectional Analysis

BackgroundThe unprecedented use of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic provided an opportunity to examine its uptake among individuals with limited English proficiency (LEP).ObjectiveTo assess telemedicine use among nonelderly adults with LEP and the association between use of telehealth and emergency department (ED) and hospital visits.DesignCross-sectional study using the National Health Interview Survey (July 2020–December 2021)ParticipantsAdults (18–64 years), with LEP (N=1488) or English proficiency (EP) (N=25,873)Main MeasuresTelemedicine, ED visits, and hospital visits in the past 12 months. We used multivariate logistic regression to assess (1) the association of English proficiency on having telemedicine visits; and (2) the association of English proficiency and telemedicine visits on having ED and hospital visits.Key ResultsBetween July 2020 and December 2021, 22% of adults with LEP had a telemedicine visit compared to 35% of adults with EP. After controlling for predisposing, enabling, and need factors, adults with LEP had 20% lower odds of having a telemedicine visit than adults with EP (p=0.02). While English proficiency was not associated with ED or hospital visits during this time, adults with telemedicine visits had significantly greater odds of having any ED (aOR: 1.80, p<0.001) and hospital visits (aOR: 2.03, p<0.001) in the past 12 months.ConclusionsWhile telemedicine use increased overall during the COVID-19 pandemic, its use remained much less likely among adults with LEP. Interventions targeting structural barriers are needed to address disparities in access to telemedicine. More research is needed to understand the relationship between English proficiency, telemedicine visits, and downstream ED and hospital visits.

Alternative care sites and resident exposure in pediatric emergency medicine: Who, what, and where.

Emergency medicine (EM) physicians and pediatricians who provide acute pediatric care depend on clinical exposure during residency to learn pediatric EM. Increasing volumes of pediatric patients, especially with behavioral health complaints, have stressed pediatric emergency departments (ED) and prompted clinical operations innovations including alternative care sites outside the main ED. We investigated the impact of these recent trends and resulting alternative care sites on the exposure of residents to core pediatric conditions. This retrospective study reviewed patient encounters between July 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022, at a pediatric ED that hosts one pediatric and three EM residencies. During the study, the hospital employed alternative care sites in response to increased and shifting patient populations. Median patients per resident per academic year were compared before and after the opening of alternative care sites, overall and stratified by patient factors (age, sex, Emergency Severity Index [ESI], and diagnostic category). The study also compared the percentage of residents who saw no patients with a given diagnosis between the two periods. Of 231,101 patient encounters, 199,947 were seen in the main ED and 31,154 in alternative care sites. The median number of patients seen by a single resident in a single academic year ranged from 82 to 136 for pediatric residents and from 128 to 183 for EM residents. The median number of patients per resident per year did not decrease for any age group, sex, ESI level, or diagnosis across the two periods. Residents saw a median of 19 more patients with psychiatric diagnoses (95% CI 15.4-22.7) in the more recent period. Seven diagnoses were not seen by at least 20% of residents during both periods. Current pediatric ED capacity challenges can be addressed with alternative care sites without decreasing volume or variety of patients seen by residents.

Impact of Care Initiation Model on Emergency Department Orders and Operational Metrics: Cohort Study.

Emergency departments (ED) employ many strategies to address crowding and prolonged wait times. They include front-end Care Initiation and clinician-in-triage models that start the diagnostic and therapeutic process while the patient waits for a care space in the ED. The objective of this study was to quantify the impact of a Care Initiation model on resource utilization and operational metrics in the ED. We performed a retrospective analysis of ED visits at our institution during October 2021. Baseline characteristics were compared with Chi-square and quantile regression. We used t-tests to calculate unadjusted difference in outcome measures, including number of laboratory tests ordered and average time patients spent in the waiting room and the ED treatment room, and the time from arrival until ED disposition. We performed propensity score analysis using matching and inverse probability weighting to quantify the direct impact of Care Initiation on outcome measures. There were 2,407 ED patient encounters, 1,191 (49%) of whom arrived during the hours when Care Initiation was active. A total of 811 (68%) of these patients underwent Care Initiation, while the remainder proceeded directly to the main treatment area. Patients were more likely to undergo Care Initiation if they had lower acuity and lower risk of admission, and if the ED was busier as measured by the number of recent arrivals and percentage of occupied ED beds. After adjusting for patient-specific and department-level covariates, Care Initiation did not increase the number of diagnostic laboratory tests ordered. Care Initiation was associated with increased waiting room time by 1.8 hours and longer time from arrival until disposition by 1.3 hours, but with decreased time in the main treatment area by 0.6 hours, which represents a 15% reduction. Care Initiation was associated with a 15% reduction in time spent in the main ED treatment area but longer waiting room time and longer time until ED disposition without significantly increasing the number of laboratory studies ordered. While previous studies produced similar results with Care Initiation models accessing all diagnostic modalities including imaging, our study demonstrates that a more limited Care Initiation model can still result in operational benefits for EDs.

Changes in low-acuity patient volume in an emergency department after launching a walk-in clinic.

Unscheduled low-acuity care options are on the rise and are often expected to reduce emergency department (ED) visits. We opened an ED-staffed walk-in clinic (WIC) as an alternative care location for low-acuity patients at a time when ED visits exceeded facility capacity and the impending flu season was anticipated to increase visits further, and we assessed whether low-acuity ED patient visits decreased after opening the WIC. In this retrospective cohort study, we compared patient and clinical visit characteristics of the ED and WIC patients and conducted interrupted time-series analyses to quantify the impact of the WIC on low-acuity ED patient visit volume and the trend. There were 27,211 low-acuity ED visits (22.7% of total ED visits), and 7,058 patients seen in the WIC from February 26, 2018, to November 17, 2019. Low-acuity patient visits in the ED reduced significantly immediately after the WIC opened (P=0.01). In the subsequent months, however, patient volume trended back to pre-WIC volumes such that there was no significant impact at 6, 9, or 12 months (P=0.07). Had WIC patients been seen in the main ED, low-acuity volume would have been 27% of the total volume rather than the 22.7% that was observed. The WIC did not result in a sustained reduction in low-acuity patients in the main ED. However, it enabled emergency staff to see low-acuity patients in a lower resource setting during times when ED capacity was limited.

Screening problematic use of substances among young subjects attending an emergency department, and subsequent treatment seeking

IntroductionYoung individuals constitute a key population for the screening of problematic use of substances (PUS), but they are not likely to seek support and are hard to reach. Targeted screening programs should thus be developed in the places of care they may attend for other reasons, including emergency departments (EDs). We aimed to explore the factors associated with PUS in young people attending an ED; we measured the subsequent access to addiction care after ED screening. MethodsThis was a prospective interventional single-arm study which included any individual aged between 16 and 25 years who attended the main ED of Lyon, France. Baseline data were sociodemographic characteristics, PUS status using self-report questionnaires and biological measures, level of psychological health, and history of physical/sexual abuse. Quick medical feedback was provided to the individuals presenting a PUS; they were advised to consult an addiction unit, and contacted by phone at three months to ask whether they had sought treatment. Baseline data were used to compare PUS and non-PUS groups using multivariable logistic regressions, to provide adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), with age, sex, employment status, and family environment as the adjustment variables. The characteristics of PUS subjects who subsequently sought treatment were also assessed using bivariable analyses. ResultsIn total, 460 participants were included; 320 of whom (69.6%) were presenting current substance use, and 221 (48.0%) with PUS. Compared to non-PUS individuals, PUS ones were more likely to be males (aOR=2.06; 95% CI [1.39–3.07], P<0.001), to be older (per one-year increase: aOR=1.09; 95% CI [1.01–1.17], P<0.05), to have an impaired mental health status (aOR=0.87; 95% CI [0.81–0.94], P<0.001), and to have a history of sexual abuse (aOR=3.33; 95% CI [2.03–5.47], P<0.0001). Only 132 (59.7%) subjects with PUS could be reached by phone at 3 months, among whom only 15 (11.4%) reported having sought treatment. Factors associated with treatment seeking were social isolation (46.7% vs. 19.7%; P=0.019), previous consultation for psychological disorders (93.3% vs. 68.4%; P=0.044), lower mental health score (2.8±1.6 vs. 5.1±2.6; P<0.001), and post-ED hospitalization in a psychiatric unit (73.3% vs. 19.7%; P<0.0001). Discussion/ConclusionEDs are relevant places to screen PUS in youth, but the level of seeking further treatment needs to be substantially improved. Offering systematic screening during an emergency room visit could allow for more appropriate identification and management of youth with PUS.

EVALUATION OF THE FIRST OLDER PEOPLE'S EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT IN ENGLAND – A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

BackgroundThe complexity of older patients along with trends in poorer outcomes in the emergency department (ED) has prompted research into how EDs can adapt to meet the needs of an aging population. A separate Older People's Emergency Department (OPED) has been proposed to improve care at the front door. ObjectiveCompare patient flow in a dedicated OPED at a University Hospital in Norfolk, United Kingdom, against that of the main ED. MethodsWe carried out a retrospective cohort study to compare older patients attending the ED in 2019 against those attending the newly formed OPED service in 2020. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to estimate adjusted odds ratios (emergency admissions, meeting England's 4-h national target, re-admissions, all-cause 30-day mortality, clinical frailty screening, and discharge to original place of residence). ResultsClinical assessment in the OPED did not significantly lower the proportion of patients admitted to the hospital (adjusted odds ratio 0.84; 95% confidence interval 0.61–1.16). There were significant reductions in overall time spent in the department, time to initial clinician review, and time to frailty screening. Patients seen in the OPED were more likely to meet the national 4-h target and more likely to be discharged to their original place of residence. ConclusionsAssessment in the OPED was not associated with a significantly reduced likelihood of hospitalization. However, patients had a shorter wait for clinical assessment, with concomitant reduction in department length of stay.

Effectiveness, safety, and efficiency of a drive-through care model as a response to the COVID-19 testing demand in the United States.

Here we report the clinical performance of COVID-19 curbside screening with triage to a drive-through care pathway versus main emergency department (ED) care for ambulatory COVID-19 testing during a pandemic. Patients were evaluated from cars to prevent the demand for testing from spreading COVID-19 within the hospital. We examined the effectiveness of curbside screening to identify patients who would be tested during evaluation, patient flow from screening to care team evaluation and testing, and safety of drive-through care as 7-day ED revisits and 14-day hospital admissions. We also compared main ED efficiency versus drive-through care using ED length of stay (EDLOS). Standardized mean differences (SMD)>0.20 identify statistical significance. Of 5931 ED patients seen, 2788 (47.0%) were walk-in patients. Of these patients, 1111 (39.8%) screened positive for potential COVID symptoms, of whom 708 (63.7%) were triaged to drive-through care (with 96.3% tested), and 403 (36.3%) triaged to the main ED (with 90.5% tested). The 1677 (60.2%) patients who screened negative were seen in the main ED, with 440 (26.2%) tested. Curbside screening sensitivity and specificity for predicting who ultimately received testing were 70.3% and 94.5%. Compared to the main ED, drive-through patients had fewer 7-day ED revisits (3.8%vs 12.5%, SMD=0.321), fewer 14-day hospital readmissions (4.5%vs 15.6%, SMD=0.37), and shorter EDLOS (0.56vs 5.12hours, SMD=1.48). Curbside screening had high sensitivity, permitting early respiratory isolation precautions for most patients tested. Low ED revisit, hospital readmissions, and EDLOS suggest drive-through care, with appropriate screening, is safe and efficient for future respiratory illness pandemics.

Emergency Department Embedded Palliative Care Service Creates Value for Health Systems.

Background: Emergency department (ED)-initiated palliative care consultation facilitates goal-concordant care while stewarding resource utilization. Delivery models are being piloted without clear operational and financial sustainability. Objective: To demonstrate that embedding a palliative care consultation service in the ED is clinically meaningful, operationally viable, and yields significant return on investment (ROI). Methods: Quasi-experimental study from August 17, 2020 to August 17, 2021. We established an ED-embedded palliative care consultation service at a 350-bed urban community hospital with 45,000 annual ED visits. A singe palliative care provider stationed in the main ED workstation area from 11 am to 7 pm daily. Matched analysis compared ED-embedded consultations against Floor and intensive care unit (ICU) consultations originating from usual practice. Results: ED consultations increased 10x, without cannibalization, to become the hospital's primary source of palliative care consultations. Clinical outcomes were meaningful, with 49% changing code status, 11% admitting to lower level of care, 11% avoiding hospitalization, 17% newly referred to hospice, and 21% newly referred to palliative care clinic. ED length of stay (LOS) did not lengthen, and ED staff strongly agreed that the service was valuable and unobtrusive. Compared with Floor, ED consultations had 8.1 days shorter hospital LOS (3.0 vs. 11.1 days, p < 0.01) with $5,974 lower median direct costs for index hospitalization ($6,211 vs. $12,005, p < 0.01). Compared with ICU, ED consultations had 4.2 days shorter hospital LOS (3.0 vs. 7.2 days, p < 0.01) with $9,332 lower median direct costs for index hospitalization ($14,093 vs. $23,425, p < 0.01). ROI was 6.7x net of foregone revenue and labor expenses. Conclusions and Relevance: This ED-embedded palliative care consultation service was clinically meaningful, operationally viable, and delivered a 6.7x ROI. ED-palliative partnerships present a quadruple aim opportunity to improve care for seriously ill patients.

Drive-Through Medicine: A Novel Health Care Delivery Mechanism for the COVID-19 Pandemic

BackgroundCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) placed additional strain on an already struggling health care system. In response, novel solutions such as telehealth have been explored, however, there is significant room for innovation in health care delivery. ObjectivesThe aim of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a drive-through medical treatment system for evaluating patients with COVID-like symptoms. MethodsWe designed a prototype drive-through medical treatment facility (DMF) to triage large volumes of patients quickly and efficiently, while fully evaluating, treating, and discharging low-risk patients. A retrospective chart review was performed to extract clinical and logistical metrics. ResultsA total of 2164 patients were evaluated between May 1 and July 1, 2020. Overall accuracy for patient classification was 92.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 91.2–93.5%). Screening criteria resulted in a return with need for workup or admission rate of 0.25%, yielding a sensitivity of 83.3% (95% CI 65.3–94.4%). Of those presenting to the DMF, 179 patients (8.3%) were diverted to the main emergency department (ED) for further evaluation, of which 14% received diagnostic workups and 5% subsequent admission to an inpatient service, yielding a specificity of 92.8% (95% CI 91.7– 93.9%). Length of stays for those seen in the DMF vs. the main ED (M = 38 min vs 149 min) yielded a mean difference of 111 min per encounter and a total time savings of 3762 h. ConclusionDrive-through medical systems can accurately triage patients presenting with potential COVID-19 and effectively treat lower-risk patients, thereby reducing ED utilization.

Analysis of self-initiated visits for cervical trauma at urgent care centers and subsequent emergency department referral

BackgroundFollowing trauma involving the cervical spine (c-spine), patients often seek care at urgent care centers (UCCs) or emergency departments (EDs). PurposeThe purpose was to assess whether UCCs could effectively image acute self-selected c-spine trauma without referral to the ED as well as to estimate costs differences between UCC and ED imaging assessment. Materials and methodsThis retrospective study identified patients receiving c-spine imaging at UCCs affiliated with a large academic hospital system from 5/1/-8/31/2021. Patients receiving c-spine X-rays with an indication of trauma following low acuity injury, at UCCs were compared to patients receiving any c-spine imaging in the main campus ED. Medical record numbers were cross-referenced to identify patients receiving imaging at both a UCC and ED within 24 h and within 7 days. Work relative value units (wRVUs) for each UCC and ED imaging type were calculated. For the hypothetical scenario of patients presenting to the ED in the absence of UCC, patients were assumed to receive c-spine computed tomography (CT) without contrast per “usually appropriate” designation by the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria®. ResultsAmong 143 self-selected, low acuity, patients who received c-spine X-rays at UCCs with an indication of trauma, one required referral to the ED within 24 h and two required referrals to the ED within 7 days. During the 4-month study period, 105.94 wRVUs ($3696.25) were saved by performing a c-spine X-ray in an UCC instead of a CT in the ED, extrapolated to 317.82 wRVUs ($11,088.74) per year. Using the average total costs of an UCC visit versus an ED visit, a total $145,976 was estimated to be saved during the study period or $437,928 per year. ConclusionOffering access for patient-initiated visits at UCCs for low-acuity c-spine trauma may help reduce the need for an ED visit, reducing imaging and healthcare visit costs. Summary statementUrgent Care Centers (UCCs) reduced the need for an Emergency Department (ED) referral visit in nearly 100% of self-selected, low acuity, patients with cervical trauma. Key results•Only 1.4% of patients required referral to an ED after a UCC visit for acute cervical trauma in this specific population.•In our system, UCCs are estimated to result in a savings of $437,928 over the course of a year in reduced ED visit costs, and $11,088.74 in wRVUs for this specific population.

Investigating racial disparities within an emergency department rapid-triage system

ObjectivesRacial disparities in emergency medical care are abundant, and processes aimed to increase throughput, such as a rapid triage fast-track (FT) systems, may exacerbate these inequities. A FT strategy may be more susceptible to implicit bias as subjective information is obtained quickly. We aim to determine whether a FT model was associated with greater disparities between Black and White emergency department (ED) patients. MethodsTriage-related outcomes were compared across race using a cohort selected from encounters in an ED that uses a FT model. White and Black patient encounters were exact-matched on potential confounders including sex; presence of abnormal vital signs; ED arrival time; insurance type; age category; and chief complaint. The primary triage-related outcome was use of the FT area (versus the main ED), and the secondary outcomes were wait time and assigned encounter acuity. ResultsEncounters for 5151 Black patients were exact-matched with 7179 encounters for White patients. Weights were applied to address differential numbers of encounters from each group. Within this matched cohort, Black patients were more likely to be triaged to FT than White patients (odds ratio = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.12; 1.46) and less likely to be given a high acuity score (odds ratio = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.66, 0.81). Among the high-acuity patients, Black patients were 40% more likely to be triaged to the FT area. ConclusionsThese results suggest that, after controlling for potential confounders, racial disparities may have been exacerbated in a FT ED triage process. In a FT model utilizing physicians and midlevel providers, this may create tiered levels of care between Black and White patients – an unacceptable side-effect of an effort to increase ED throughput.

1061 AN EMERGENCY FRAILTY UNIT AS AN INTERVENTION TO PREVENT INPATIENT FALLS IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT

Abstract Introduction There is evidence that dedicated units that provide comprehensive geriatric assessment can reduce inpatient falls and other iatrogenic harm1. The Emergency Department (ED) in Morriston Hospital has 90,000 attendances a year. 4,000 patients &amp;gt;65 years presented with falls. Between January 2018–November 2021, ED reported 207 incidents of falls via the Health Board Datix System. Intervention Phase 1 In April 2018, the Older Person’s Assessment Service (OPAS) (Geriatrician led Multidisciplinary team) began a liaison service to ED, taking referrals from the medical and ED teams for patients presented with frailty syndromes. Phase 2 In June 2020, OPAS was allocated a dedicated Emergency Frailty Unit within the Emergency Department footprint, allowing patients to be assessed rapidly by a specialist team and nursed in a specialist environment. Results Between June 2020–November 2021, the service saw 1,317 new patients. The average age of an OPAS patient was 83 years and had a Rockwood Clinical Frailty Scale Score of &amp;gt;5. 73% of patients presented with falls as a primary presenting complaint. Between June 2020–November 2021, there was one reported fall within the unit. The mean incident reported of inpatient falls in ED in phase 2 (M = 5.50, SD = 2.66) is statistically significantly higher than phase 1 (M = 3.96, SD = 1.87), t(42) = −2.26, p = 0.03. The service did not show any impact on the incidence of inpatient falls in ED. Conclusion The unit was an effective intervention to prevent falls for the patients it assessed within the unit but had no impact on inpatient falls within the main ED. The impact of this service is difficult to determine given the low reported falls in ED. 1. Fox MT, Persaud M, Maimets I et al. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2012, 60:2237–2,245.

The Relationship of Secondary and Chronic Health Conditions With Emergency Department Visits and Related Hospitalizations Among People With Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

ObjectiveIdentify the relationship of health conditions with self-reported emergency department (ED) visits and ED-related hospitalizations among people with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI), while controlling for demographic, injury, and socioeconomic factors. DesignCross-sectional. SettingA regional SCI model system in the Southeastern United States. ParticipantsParticipants (N=648) were adults with chronic traumatic SCI at least 1 year postinjury who were identified through their Form II annual follow-up within the SCI Model Systems. InterventionsN/A. Main Outcome MeasuresSelf-reported ED visits and ED-related hospitalizations within the 12 months prior to the study. ResultsSeveral types of factors were significantly related to ED visits, with fewer related to ED hospitalizations. Men (odds ratio [OR]=1.58); those divorced, widowed, or separated (OR=1.57); and those with more severe SCI (C1-C4, or American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale A/B) had greater odds of having at least 1 ED visit; education and employment factors were not significant. Of health conditions, acute secondary health conditions including falls (OR=1.45), urinary tract infections (UTIs; OR=2.40), and pressure injuries (OR=1.58) were all associated with a greater odds of ED visits, whereas chronic health conditions were not. Being unemployed was associated with greater odds of an ED hospitalization (OR=1.79), as was having at least 1 UTI (OR=2.24) and at least 1 pressure injury (OR=2.37). ConclusionsThe current findings suggest acute secondary health conditions, particularly UTIs and pressure injuries, were much more highly related to ED visits and related hospitalizations compared to chronic health conditions (eg, diabetes, hypertension). Greater attention needs to be paid to fall, UTI, and pressure injury prevention to reduce the ED burden related to SCI.

Fallacy of Median Door-to-ECG Time: Hidden Opportunities for STEMI Screening Improvement.

BackgroundST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) guidelines recommend screening arriving emergency department (ED) patients for an early ECG in those with symptoms concerning for myocardial ischemia. Process measures target median door‐to‐ECG (D2E) time of 10 minutes.Methods and ResultsThis 3‐year descriptive retrospective cohort study, including 676 ED‐diagnosed patients with STEMI from 10 geographically diverse facilities across the United States, examines an alternative approach to quantifying performance: proportion of patients meeting the goal of D2E≤10 minutes. We also identified characteristics associated with D2E>10 minutes and estimated the proportion of patients with screening ECG occurring during intake, triage, and main ED care periods. We found overall median D2E was 7 minutes (IQR:4–16; range: 0–1407 minutes; range of ED medians: 5–11 minutes). Proportion of patients with D2E>10 minutes was 37.9% (ED range: 21.5%–57.1%). Patients with D2E>10 minutes, compared to those with D2E≤10 minutes, were more likely female (32.8% versus 22.6%, P=0.005), Black (23.4% versus 12.4%, P=0.005), non‐English speaking (24.6% versus 19.5%, P=0.032), diabetic (40.2% versus 30.2%, P=0.010), and less frequently reported chest pain (63.3% versus 87.4%, P<0.001). ECGs were performed during ED intake in 62.1% of visits, ED triage in 25.3%, and main ED care in 12.6%.ConclusionsExamining D2E>10 minutes can identify opportunities to improve care for more ED patients with STEMI. Our findings suggest sex, race, language, and diabetes are associated with STEMI diagnostic delays. Moving the acquisition of ECGs completed during triage to intake could achieve the D2E≤10 minutes goal for 87.4% of ED patients with STEMI. Sophisticated screening, accounting for differential risk and diversity in STEMI presentations, may further improve timely detection.

Advanced practice providers in academic emergency medicine: A national survey of chairs and program directors.

The Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Board of Directors convened a task force to elucidate the current state of workforce, operational, and educational issues being faced by academic medical centers related to advanced practice providers (APPs). The task force surveyed academic emergency department (ED) chairs and residency program directors (PDs). The survey was distributed to the Association of Academic Chairs of Emergency Medicine (AACEM)-member chairs and their respective residency PDs in 2021. We surveyed 125 chairs with their self-identified PDs. The survey sampled hiring, state-independent practice laws, scope of practice, teaching and supervision, training opportunities, delegation of procedures between physician learners and APPs, and perceptions of the impact on resident and medical student education. Of the AACEM-member chairs identified, 73% responded and 47% of PDs responded. Most (98%) employ either physician assistants or nurse practitioners. Among responding departments, 86% report APPs working in fast-track settings, 80% work in the main ED, and 54% work in the waiting room. In 44% of departments, APPs and residents evaluate patients concurrently, and 2% of respondents reported that APPs manage high-acuity patients without attending involvement. Two-thirds of chairs believe that APPs contribute positively to the quality of patient care, while 44% believe that APPs contribute to the academic environment. One-third of PDs believe that the presence of APPs interferes with resident education. Although 75% of PDs believe that residents require training to work effectively with APPs in the ED, almost half (49%) report zero hours of training around APP supervision or collaborative skills. APPs are ubiquitous across academic EDs. Future research is required for academic ED leaders to balance physician and APP deployment across the academic ED within the context of patient care, resident education, institutional resources, professional development opportunities for APP staff, and standardization of APP EM training.

Pediatric emergency department visits during the COVID-19 pandemic: a large retrospective population-based study

BackgroundCOVID-19 pandemic has stretched healthcare system capacities worldwide and deterred people from seeking medical support at Emergency Departments (ED). Nevertheless, population-based studies examining the consequences on children are lacking.MethodsAll ED visits from 2019 to 2020 in Veneto, Italy (4.9 million residents) were collected. Anonymized records of pediatric (≤14 years) ED visits included patient characteristics, arrival mode, triage code, clinical presentation, and discharge mode. Year-on-year variation of the main ED visit characteristics, and descriptive trends throughout the study period have been examined.ResultsOverall, 425,875 ED presentations were collected, 279,481 in 2019, and 146,394 in 2020 (− 48%), with a peak (− 79%) in March–April (first pandemic wave), and a second peak (below − 60%) in November–December (second pandemic wave). Burn or trauma, and fever were the two most common clinical presentations. Visits for nonurgent conditions underwent the strongest reduction during both pandemic waves, while urgent conditions reduced less sharply. ED arrival by ambulance was more common in 2020 (4.5%) than 2019 (3.5%), with a higher proportion of red triage codes (0.5%, and 0.4% respectively), and hospitalizations following ED discharge (9.1%, and 5.9% respectively).ConclusionSince the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, pediatric ED presentations underwent a steeper reduction than that observed for adults. Lockdown and fear of contagion in hospital-based services likely deterred parents from seeking medical support for their children. Given COVID-19 could become endemic, it is imperative that public health experts guarantee unhindered access to medical support for urgent, and less urgent health conditions, while minimizing infectious disease risks, to prevent children from suffering direct and indirect consequences of the pandemic.