Magnetic Resonance Flow Quantification Research Articles

In-vivo validation of interpolation-based phase offset correction in cardiovascular magnetic resonance flow quantification: a multi-vendor, multi-center study

BackgroundA velocity offset error in phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is a known problem in clinical assessment of flow volumes in vessels around the heart. Earlier studies have shown that this offset error is clinically relevant over different systems, and cannot be removed by protocol optimization. Correction methods using phantom measurements are time consuming, and assume reproducibility of the offsets which is not the case for all systems. An alternative previously published solution is to correct the in-vivo data in post-processing, interpolating the velocity offset from stationary tissue within the field-of-view. This study aims to validate this interpolation-based offset correction in-vivo in a multi-vendor, multi-center setup.MethodsData from six 1.5 T CMR systems were evaluated, with two systems from each of the three main vendors. At each system aortic and main pulmonary artery 2D flow studies were acquired during routine clinical or research examinations, with an additional phantom measurement using identical acquisition parameters. To verify the phantom acquisition, a region-of-interest (ROI) at stationary tissue in the thorax wall was placed and compared between in-vivo and phantom measurements. Interpolation-based offset correction was performed on the in-vivo data, after manually excluding regions of spatial wraparound. Correction performance of different spatial orders of interpolation planes was evaluated.ResultsA total of 126 flow measurements in 82 subjects were included. At the thorax wall the agreement between in-vivo and phantom was − 0.2 ± 0.6 cm/s. Twenty-eight studies were excluded because of a difference at the thorax wall exceeding 0.6 cm/s from the phantom scan, leaving 98. Before correction, the offset at the vessel as assessed in the phantom was − 0.4 ± 1.5 cm/s, which resulted in a − 5 ± 16% error in cardiac output. The optimal order of the interpolation correction plane was 1st order, except for one system at which a 2nd order plane was required. Application of the interpolation-based correction revealed a remaining offset velocity of 0.1 ± 0.5 cm/s and 0 ± 5% error in cardiac output.ConclusionsThis study shows that interpolation-based offset correction reduces the offset with comparable efficacy as phantom measurement phase offset correction, without the time penalty imposed by phantom scans.Trial registrationThe study was registered in The Netherlands National Trial Register (NTR) under TC 4865. Registered 19 September 2014. Retrospectively registered.

Influence of slice thickness on MR flow quantification in turbulent jets

Magnetic Resonance (MR) based flow quantification is of high interest in several cardiac diseases, e.g. valvular stenosis. However, accurate results remain challenging in several conditions. Recently, some contributors could be defined including echo time [1] (TE) and background phase errors [2]. We investigated the influence of slice thickness on flow quantification in turbulent flow.

Measurement of total pulmonary arterial compliance using invasive pressure monitoring and MR flow quantification during MR-guided cardiac catheterization

Pulmonary hypertensive disease is assessed by quantification of pulmonary vascular resistance. Pulmonary total arterial compliance is also an indicator of pulmonary hypertensive disease. However, because of difficulties in measuring compliance, it is rarely used. We describe a method of measuring pulmonary arterial compliance utilizing magnetic resonance (MR) flow data and invasive pressure measurements. Seventeen patients with suspected pulmonary hypertension or congenital heart disease requiring preoperative assessment underwent MR-guided cardiac catheterization. Invasive manometry was used to measure pulmonary arterial pressure, and phase-contrast MR was used to measure flow at baseline and at 20 ppm nitric oxide (NO). Total arterial compliance was calculated using the pulse pressure method (parameter optimization of the 2-element windkessel model) and the ratio of stroke volume to pulse pressure. There was good agreement between the two estimates of compliance (r = 0.98, P < 0.001). However, there was a systematic bias between the ratio of stroke volume to pulse pressure and the pulse pressure method (bias = 61%, upper level of agreement = 84%, lower level of agreement = 38%). In response to 20 ppm NO, there was a statistically significant fall in resistance, systolic pressure, and pulse pressure. In seven patients, total arterial compliance increased >10% in response to 20 ppm NO. As a population, the increase did not reach statistical significance. There was an inverse relation between compliance and resistance (r = 0.89, P < 0.001) and between compliance and mean pulmonary arterial pressure (r = 0.72, P < 0.001). We have demonstrated the feasibility of quantifying total arterial compliance using an MR method.

Impact of head movements on morphology and flow in the internal carotid artery after carotid angioplasty and stenting versus endarterectomy

Because stents can cause vessel angulation during movement, we hypothesized that internal carotid artery (ICA) stents might lead to alterations of cerebropetal blood flow. This study assessed three-dimensional anatomy and volumetric flow rate (VFR) in the ICA in various head positions by comparing patients treated with carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) with patients treated with carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and magnetic resonance flow quantification were performed on six subjects after CAS (median age, 70 years) and on six subjects after CEA (median age, 67 years). All investigations were performed in five head positions: neutral, bent forward, bent backward, and turned to the treated, ipsilateral side and to the contralateral side. Maximum-intensity projection reconstructions were obtained to measure maximal angulation of the ICA in the forward, backward, ipsilateral, and contralateral positions compared with neutral. Subsequently, the plane perpendicular to the ICA, 1 cm distal to the stent or 4 cm distal to the carotid bifurcation (CEA patients), was established. The VFR through this plane was measured for each position, and the forward, backward, ipsilateral, and contralateral positions were compared with neutral. In CAS patients, there was a median change in ICA angulation of +10.2 degrees (interquartile range, +7.3 degrees to +17.9 degrees ) in the forward position, compared with +0.2 degrees (-1.0 degrees to +2.4 degrees ) in CEA patients ( P = .016). In all other head positions, there was no statistically significant difference in angulation change. There was no statistically significant difference in VFR change between groups in any of the head positions tested. There was a significant increase in ICA angulation in CAS patients if the head was bent forward; this was not observed in CEA patients. This angulation change did not lead to significant acute changes in cerebropetal blood flow, but it might have chronic effects not yet tested.

Carotid artery stenosis: clinical efficacy of MR phase-contrast flow quantification as an adjunct to MR angiography.

To assess the utility of magnetic resonance (MR) flow quantification in the evaluation of suspected carotid artery stenosis. Fifty-five patients referred for angiography and 10 healthy volunteers underwent Doppler ultrasound, three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography, and MR phase-contrast flow quantification to measure peak systolic velocity (PSV) and volumetric flow rate (VFR) in the common and internal carotid arteries distal to the stenosis. PSV and VFR were significantly lower in the severely (> or = 70%) stenosed internal carotid arteries (P < .05). The VFR ratio (internal carotid artery-common carotid artery) achieved 91% overall accuracy for detection of severe stenosis. Combination of flow data with results of MR angiography yielded sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval, 78%-100%) with a modest loss in specificity. Doppler and MR measurements of PSV in the common carotid artery showed significant correlation: volunteers, r = .73; patients, r = .64. MR flow quantification provides information about the hemodynamic significance of carotid stenosis. As an adjunct to MR angiography, it may be useful in enabling differentiation of occlusions from critical stenoses.

Flow quantification in the superior sagittal sinus using magnetic resonance

To date, the intracerebral veins and venous sinuses have not been amenable to noninvasive study. We describe a magnetic resonance (MR) technique using "bolus tracking" for rapid imaging and measurement of cerebral venous flow. We specifically applied the technique to the superior sagittal sinus, but it can be used for evaluation of other cerebral venous structures. In 10 healthy subjects and 21 patients referred for MR brain studies, mean flow was 420 ml/min. There was a significant inverse correlation between blood flow and age. There were dynamic changes in cerebral blood flow (CBF) during hyperventilation and hypercapnia. Since the cerebral cortex drains almost exclusively to the superior sagittal sinus, these flow measurements represent an index of global CBF. MR flow quantification provides a new means for assessing dynamic changes in CBF, and may prove useful for monitoring the effects of various disease processes and pharmaceutical agents on CBF.