Magnetic Resonance Arthrogram Research Articles

Magnetic Resonance Arthrogram Outperforms Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2 Weeks After First Shoulder Dislocation for Labral Tear Diagnosis

PurposeThe aim of this study was to determine the comparative accuracy and precision of routine Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) versus MR arthrogram in measuring labral tear size as a function of time from a shoulder dislocation. MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients who underwent primary arthroscopic stabilization between 2012 and 2021 in a single academic center. All patients completed a pre-operative MRI or MR arthrogram of the shoulder within 60 days of injury, and subsequently underwent arthroscopic repair within 6 months of imaging. Intraoperative labral tear size and location was used as standard for comparison. Three musculoskeletal radiologists independently interpreted tear extent using a clock-face convention. Accuracy and precision of MR labral tear measurements were defined based on location and size of the tear, respectively. Accuracy and precision were compared between MRI and MR arthrogram, as a function of time from dislocation. Results32 MRIs and 65 MR arthrograms (total n=97) were assessed. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that intraoperative tear size, early imaging, and arthrogram status were associated with increased MR accuracy and precision (p<0.05). Ordering surgeons preferred arthrogram for delayed imaging (p=0.018). For routine MRI, error in accuracy increased by 3.4° per day and error in precision increased by 2.3° per day (p<0.001) from time of injury. MR arthrogram, however, was not temporally influenced. Significant loss of accuracy and precision of MRI compared to MR arthrogram occurred at 2 weeks after an acute shoulder dislocation. ConclusionCompared to MR Arthrogram, conventional MRI demonstrates time-dependent loss of accuracy and precision in determining shoulder labral tear extent following dislocation, with statistical divergence occurring at 2 weeks.

Risk Factors for Glenoid Bone Loss in the Setting of Posterior Glenohumeral Instability.

Posterior instability has been reported to account for up to 24% of cases of shoulder instability in certain active populations. However, there is a paucity of data available regarding the risk factors associated with posterior glenoid bone loss. To characterize the epidemiology of, and risk factors associated with, glenoid bone loss within a cohort of patients who underwent primary arthroscopic shoulder stabilization for isolated posterior-type glenohumeral instability. Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. This was a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent primary arthroscopic shoulder stabilization for posterior-type instability between January 2011 and December 2019. Preoperative magnetic resonance arthrograms were used to calculate posterior glenoid bone loss using a perfect circle technique. Patient characteristics and revision rates were obtained. Bone loss (both in millimeters and as a percentage) was compared between patients based on sex, age, arm dominance, sports participation, time to surgery, glenoid version, history of trauma, and number of anchors used for labral repair. Included were 112 patients with a mean age of 28.66 ± 10.07 years; 91 patients (81.25%) were found to have measurable bone loss. The mean bone loss was 2.46 ± 1.68 mm (8.98% ± 6.12%). Significantly greater bone loss was found in athletes versus nonathletes (10.09% ± 6.86 vs 7.44% ± 4.56; P = .0232), female versus male patients (11.17% ± 6.53 vs 8.17% ± 5.80; P = .0212), and patients dominant arm involvement versus nondominant arm involvement (10.26% ± 5.63 vs 7.07% ± 6.38; P = .0064). Multivariate regression analysis identified dominant arm involvement as an independent risk factor for bone loss (P = .0033), and dominant arm involvement (P = .0024) and athlete status (P = .0133) as risk factors for bone loss >13.5%. At the conclusion of the study period, 7 patients had experienced recurrent instability (6.25%). The findings of this study are in alignment with existing data suggesting that posterior glenoid bone loss is highly prevalent in patients undergoing primary arthroscopic stabilization for posterior-type shoulder instability. Our results suggest that patients with dominant arm involvement are at risk for greater posterior glenoid bone loss. Athlete status and dominant arm involvement were identified as independent risk factors for bone loss >13.5%.

The 2D and 3D MR arthrographic description of aponeurotic expansion of supraspinatus tendon and biceps tendon anomaly in a large patient cohort.

To describe the aponeurotic expansion of supraspinatus tendon (AEST) and biceps tendon abnormalities with magnetic resonance (MR) arthrographic examinations and determine their prevalence in patients, we performed a high-resolution 3D direct MR arthrography. This was a retrospective study of 700 shoulder MR arthrograms performed between May 2010 and January 2022. Extension in the coronal plane of an AEST on 3D fat-suppressed T1-weighted volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) MR arthrography was identified. Based on its morphology, the AEST on MR arthrography was divided into four subtypes: absence of tendinous thickness in the bicipital synovial surface or intra-synovial tendon-like structure in the bicipital groove, thin and flat tendinous thickness ≥1 mm of bicipital synovium, oval tendinous structure less than half the size of the adjacent biceps tendon, oval tendinous structure more than half the size of the adjacent biceps tendon, and oval tendinous structure larger than the adjacent biceps tendon. Based on its origin and termination, aponeurotic expansions can be divided into three subtypes: proximal pulley zone, middle humeral neck zone, and distal myotendinous junction zone. Association with the biceps synovium of the AEST was categorized into three types: intra-synovial, extra-synovial, and trans-synovial. An AEST in the anterior shoulder joint in 3D VIBE MR arthrography images was identified in 63 (9%) of 700 arthrograms. The most common arthrographic type of AEST was type 1-this was detected in 39 of 63 patients. The most common course type of the AEST was anteriorly midline. The most common distal insertion type was at the tenosynovial sheath of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) in the middle humeral neck zone-this was detected in 31 of 63 patients. There were only 10 MR arthrograms biceps tendon abnormality, including 4 biceps agenesis and 6 split ruptures. A 2D and high-resolution 3D MR arthrography can demonstrate the anatomical detail around the bicipital groove and facilitate the differentiation between a biceps tendon anomaly and an AEST. On high-resolution 3D MR arthrographic images, the AEST tends to be in the anterior midline and anteromedial portions of the biceps synovium with intra-synovial, extra-synovial, and trans-synovial courses and its three different insertion types.

Comparative evaluation of magnetic resonance arthrogram with arthroscopy in knee pathologies

Background: Magnetic resonance arthrogram (MRA) has emerged as a supplement to non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), especially in the identification of meniscal and chondral pathologies. It has increased the diagnostic efficacy of MRI in the evaluation of knee pathologies. Aims and Objectives: The present study was carried out to evaluate the role of MRA in the diagnosis of various knee pathologies and to correlate its findings with arthroscopy. Materials and Methods: A total of 56 patients with knee pain scheduled to undergo arthroscopic evaluation were enrolled in the study and were assessed using MRA before arthroscopy. MRA findings were correlated with arthroscopic findings. The level of agreement was measured using kappa statistics. Diagnostic efficacy was assessed in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Results: Cartilage involvement (48.2%), anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear and medial meniscus tear (37.5% each), bony injury (n=12; 21.4%), chondral defect (n=11; 19.6%), posterior cruciate ligament tear (n=10; 17.9%), and lateral meniscus tear (n=8; 14.3%) were the knee pathologies confirmed by arthroscopy. MRA had a sensitivity and specificity of 100% for pathologies such as ACL tear, lateral meniscus tear, medial meniscus tear, and bony injury. It was 100% specific for all the pathologies with no false positive detection. There was a strong to perfect agreement between MRA and arthroscopic findings for different knee pathologies. Conclusion: The present study found MRA to be a highly specific diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of different knee pathologies and it is useful in reducing the burden of undesired invasive arthroscopies.

Diagnosis of Posterior and Combined-Type Shoulder Instability: A 10-Year Cross-sectional Study From a Single Military Base

Background: Large variations exist in the reported frequency and etiology of posterior and combined shoulder instability in the active-duty military population. Purpose: To compare imaging and clinical examination findings as well as reoperation rates between active-duty military patients who underwent surgery for anterior, posterior, and combined-type shoulder instability. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on patients treated surgically for shoulder instability from a single military base from January 2010 to December 2019. Each case was characterized as isolated anterior, isolated posterior, or combined, according to arthroscopic findings. Information was collected on patient characteristics, history of trauma, time to surgery, associated pathological findings, and survivorship at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Results: Overall, 416 patients (n = 394 men; n = 22 women), with a mean age of 29.1 years, underwent primary shoulder stabilization surgery during the study period. There were 158 patients (38%) with isolated anterior instability, 139 (33%) with isolated posterior instability, and 119 (29%) with combined instability. A history of trauma was more prevalent with isolated anterior instability (129 [81.7%]) than with either isolated posterior (95 [68.4%]) or combined instability (73 [61.3%]) ( P = .047 and P = .001, respectively). Patients with anterior instability were significantly more likely to be diagnosed on the preoperative physical examination when compared with patients with posterior instability (93% vs 79.1%; P &lt; .001) or combined instability (93% vs 75.6%; P &lt; .001) and were also more likely to have a discrete labral tear detected on a preoperative magnetic resonance arthrogram than patients with posterior instability (82.9% vs 63.3%; P &lt; .001). There was no significant difference in the rate of medical discharge or recurrent instability requiring reoperation between groups. Conclusion: The study findings indicated that young, active-duty military patients are at increased risk for isolated posterior and combined-type shoulder instability, with posterior and combined instability collectively accounting for over 60% of instability cases in this cohort. Orthopaedic surgeons should be aware of instability when evaluating and treating young, active-duty military patients with shoulder pain, even in the absence of diagnostic physical examinations or imaging findings.

Does needle penetration of the shoulder joint prior to arthroscopy increase infection risk? The effect of preoperative magnetic resonance arthrogram or corticosteroid injection.

Prior literature has associated preoperative corticosteroid shoulder injection (CSI) with infection following shoulder surgery. A recent study found an equally elevated risk of total knee arthroplasty infection with preoperative injection of either CSI or hyaluronic acid. The implication is that violation of a joint prior to surgery, even in the absence of corticosteroid, may pose an elevated risk of infection following orthopedic surgery. The aim of the present study was to determine whether violation of the shoulder joint for magnetic resonance arthrogram (MRA) poses an elevated risk of infection following shoulder arthroscopy, and to compare this risk to that introduced by preoperative CSI. A national, all-payer database was queried to identify patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy between January 2015 and October 2020. Patients were stratified into the following groups: (1) no CSI or MRA within 6months of surgery (n=5000), (2) CSI within 2weeks of surgery (n=1055), (3) CSI between 2 and 4weeks prior to surgery (n=2575), (4) MRA within 2weeks of surgery (n=414), and (5) MRA between 2 and 4weeks prior to surgery (n=1138). Postoperative infection (septic shoulder or surgical site infection) was analyzed at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years, postoperatively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis controlled for differences among groups. MRA within 2weeks prior to shoulder surgery was associated with an increased risk of infection at 1year (odds ratio [OR], 2.17; P=.007), while MRA 2-4weeks preceding surgery was not associated with an increased risk of postoperative infection at any time point. By comparison, CSI within 2weeks prior to surgery was associated with an increased risk of postoperative infection at 90 days (OR, 1.72; P=.022), 1 year (OR, 1.65; P=.005), and 2 years (OR, 1.63; P=.002) following surgery. Similarly, CSI 2-4weeks prior to surgery was associated with an increased risk of postoperative infection at 90 days (OR, 1.83; P<.001), 1 year (OR, 1.62; P<.001), and 2 years (OR, 1.79; P<.001). Preoperative CSI within 4weeks of shoulder arthroscopy elevates the risk of postoperative infection. Needle arthrotomy for shoulder MRA elevates the risk of infection in a more limited fashion. Avoidance of MRA within 2weeks of shoulder arthroscopy may mitigate postoperative infection risk. Additionally, the association between preoperative CSI and postoperative infection may be more attributed to medication profile than to needle arthrotomy.

Does Needle Penetration of the Shoulder Joint Prior to Arthroscopy Increase Infection Risk? The Effect of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Arthrogram or Corticosteroid Injection

Does Needle Penetration of the Shoulder Joint Prior to Arthroscopy Increase Infection Risk? The Effect of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Arthrogram or Corticosteroid Injection

MRI findings of traumatic and degenerative rotator cuff tears and introduction of the “cobra sign”

A rotator cuff tear (RCT) is a common shoulder diagnosis and its etiology may be acute, traumatic, or chronic degenerative. Differentiation between the 2 etiologies may be important for multiple reasons, but remains difficult based on imaging. Further knowledge about radiographic and magnetic resonance findings to distinguish traumatic from degenerative RCT is needed. We analyzed magnetic resonance arthrograms (MRAs) of 96 patients with traumatic or degenerative superior RCT, which were matched according their age and the affected rotator cuff muscle into the 2 groups. Patients older than 66 years of age were excluded from the study to avoid including cases with pre-existing degeneration. In the case of traumatic RCT, the time between the trauma and MRA had to be less than 3 months. Various parameters of the supraspinatus (SSP) muscle-tendon unit were assessed (tendon thickness, presence of a remaining tendon stump at the greater tubercle, magnitude of retraction, layer appearance). The retraction of the 2 SSP layers were individually measured to determine the difference of retraction. Additionally, edema of the tendon and muscle, the tangent- and kinking-sign as well as the newly introduced Cobra-sign (bulging of the distal part of the ruptured tendon with slim configuration of the medial part of the tendon) were analyzed. Edema within the SSP muscle (sensitivity 13%, specificity 100%, P=.011) or the tendon (sensitivity 86%, specificity 36%, P=.014) are more frequent in traumatic RCT. The same association was found for the kinking-sign (sensitivity 53%, specificity 71%, P=.018) and the Cobra sign (sensitivity 47%, specificity 84%, P=.001). Even though not statistically significant, tendencies were observed toward thicker tendon stumps in traumatic RCT, and greater difference in retraction between the 2 SSP layers in the degenerative group. The cohorts had no difference in the presence of a tendon stump at the greater tuberosity. Muscle and tendon edema, as well as tendon kinking appearance and the newly introduced cobra-sign are suitable MRA parameters to distinguish between traumatic and degenerative etiology of a superior RTC.

Shoulder instability in military personnel: diagnosis and outcomes of arthroscopic stabilisation

IntroductionShoulder instability is a common problem for military personnel due to the highly physical demands of work and training. This study assessed the pattern of glenoid labrum tears suffered by...

Posterior Humeral Avulsion of the Glenohumeral Ligament: A Critical Analysis Review.

Posterior humeral avulsions of the inferior glenohumeral ligament represent an increasingly recognized but likely underdiagnosed source of posterior shoulder instability and pain. Injuries are commonly reported in athletic individuals who have sustained injury by either traumatic or atraumatic mechanisms; the ligament is most susceptible to injury with the shoulder in flexion, adduction, and internal rotation. Posterior humeral avulsions of the glenohumeral ligament often occur in the setting of concurrent injuries to the posterior or inferior labrum. Diagnosis is often challenging due to nonspecific symptoms and physical examination findings; a magnetic resonance arthrogram generally is utilized to identify avulsion from the humeral attachment; however, a definitive diagnosis is often made at the time of arthroscopic evaluation. In patients with persistent discomfort and limitations following nonoperative management, operative fixation, primarily utilizing arthroscopic techniques, can be performed to restore motion and glenohumeral stability.

Sensitivity and Specificity Predictive Value of The Hip Internal Rotation with Distraction (THIRD) Test for Hip Labral Tears

This study evaluated the diagnostic test characteristics of Myrick The Hip Internal Rotation with Distraction (THIRD) vs magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or magnetic resonance arthrogram (MRA) for diagnosing hip labral pathology. A 7-year retrospective medical record review was performed. All medical records that had the chief complaint of hip pain with documentation of THIRD, MRI or MRA, and arthroscopic findings (ie, gold standard) were pulled, and data were extracted for findings of each of the tests. There were 81 records. Compared with MRI/MRA, THIRD had significantly better sensitivity (91% vs 65%, <i>P</i> <.001) and accuracy (89% vs 64%, <i>P</i> < .001). THIRD outperformed MRI/MRA and is a noninvasive, low-cost procedure to diagnosis hip labral pathology.

Radial Sided Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears: A Comprehensive Review.

When evaluating the available literature on the diagnosis and management of triangular fibrocartilage complex tears (TFCC), ulnar tears comprise the major focus of TFCC literature. Radial-sided (Class 1D) tears are seldom researched or discussed. The purpose of this study was to review the methods for identifying and treating radial-sided TFCC lesions, by examining the anatomy of the TFCC, the pathology of its radial portion, diagnostic techniques, and both surgical and nonoperative treatments. The avascular nature of the radial TFCC may influence its healing potential. Magnetic resonance arthrogram is the gold standard for non-invasively diagnosing a radial-sided tear. Non-operative management should be exhausted prior to surgical intervention, which commonly involves an inside-out repair involving radial trans-osseous sutures. Still, the literature is limited by patient sample size and therefore requires a greater population of class 1-D tears to confirm optimal diagnostic and treatment methods.

The relationship of glenoid version and severity of glenoid bone loss in anterior shoulder instability patients: A retrospective cohort study

Background/objectiveThe effect of glenoid version on the severity of glenoid bone loss is not completely understood, although the variation of glenoid version angles is considered to reflect the degree of glenoid bone loss in anterior shoulder instability cases. The objective of this retrospective case-control study is to determine the relationship of the glenoid version and the severity of glenoid bone loss in a group of previously documented recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation patients. MethodsWe retrospectively collected magnetic resonance arthrogram (MRA) data from 72 patients with unidirectional recurrent anterior shoulder instability. The best-fit circle method was used to identify the percentage of glenoid bone loss. Measurements of glenoid labral, chondral, and bony versions were performed using the Friedman method. ResultsUsing univariate regression analysis, it was found that a retroversion angle of more than 4 degrees was associated with an increased risk ratio for the occurrence of a critical glenoid defect by approximately 5 times. Conclusions24 Univariate logistic regression analysis, used to determine the presence of a critical glenoid bone defect, showed that both the bony version angle and the number of previous dislocations were significantly associated with the extent of glenoid bone loss. A retroversion angle of more than 4 degrees was associated with an approximately five-fold increase in the odds ratio for the presence of a critical glenoid defect. Surgeons may use the value of the measured glenoid version in prediction the required version of the reconstructive treatment.

Acetabular labral tear is associated with high pelvic incidence with or without femoroacetabular impingement morphology

PurposeThe aim of this study was to investigate the association between pelvic sagittal parameters and acetabular labral tears.MethodsThree-hundred and sixty-five patients (449 hips) who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or magnetic resonance arthrogram (MRA) for hip pain were enrolled in this study. Pelvic sagittal parameters, including the pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, and sacral slope, were measured with a standing lumbosacral lateral radiograph. All subjects were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of radiologic acetabular labral tears and compared. Furthermore, the two groups were divided into subgroups according to whether femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) morphology was present or not and compared.ResultsPelvic incidence was greater in the labral tear group than in the non-labral tear group (52.3° ± 8.2° versus 47.1° ± 6.8°, p < 0.001). After accounting for potentially confounding variables, we found that higher age (odds ratio 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02 to 1.06, p = 0.001), FAI (odds ratio 15.11, 95% CI 7.43 to 30.75, p < 0.001), and high pelvic incidence (odds ratio 1.13, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.17, p < 0.001) were independently associated with acetabular labral tear. When only the patients without FAI (308 hips) were divided into groups with and without acetabular labral tear, we found that higher age (odds ratio 1.03, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.06, p = 0.008) and high pelvic incidence (odds ratio 1.15, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.19, p < 0.001) were independently associated with acetabular labral tear.ConclusionAcetabular labral tear is associated with high pelvic incidence with or without FAI morphology.Level of evidenceIII.

The Cartilage Wear Index: a new evaluation method to improve patient selection in surgical treatment of recurrent posterior glenohumeral instability.

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to validate glenoid cartilage lesions as a negative prognostic factor and to define a new image-based preoperative evaluation method to identify surgical candidates for arthroscopic labral refixation with suture anchors in posterior shoulder instability.MethodsTwenty-six patients who underwent arthroscopic posterior labral repair for shoulder instability were evaluated. Only patients with structural dynamic posterior instability were included. We evaluated on preoperative magnetic resonance arthrogram: glenoid version, humeral head subluxation, type of capsular insertion, and the cartilage lesions using the new Cartilage Wear Index (CWI). Two subgroups were analyzed with regard to the preoperative CWI and shoulder outcome scores: Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI).ResultsThe median age at operation was 28 (interquartile range = 21-33) years. Median overall postoperative outcome assessment demonstrated a SANE of 90 and a WOSI of 385. The median CWI was 1.02. Subgroup analysis revealed worse median WOSI and SANE scores in patients with a CWI >1.02 and a strong correlation between a high preoperative CWI and a higher postoperative WOSI score (R = 0.58; P = .038).ConclusionThe CWI can be useful to identify patients who might obtain better outcomes when treated with arthroscopic labral repair in posterior shoulder instability.

Magnetic Resonance Arthrogram Improves Visualization of Hip Capsular Defects in Patients Undergoing Previous Hip Arthroscopy

PurposeTo compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with magnetic resonance arthrogram (MRA) in the identification of hip capsular defects in patients who previously underwent hip arthroscopy.MethodsPatients who underwent revision hip arthroscopy for capsular insufficiency by a single surgeon between March 2014 and December 2019 were identified by Current Procedural Terminology code. Patients with arthroscopically confirmed capsular defects treated surgically who underwent both MRI and MRA between their primary and revision surgeries were identified. Imaging studies were blinded, randomized, and distributed to two fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists. Radiologists evaluated 14 components of different anatomic structures, including the presence of capsular defect and defect grading, over 2 months, with a 2-week washout period between 4 sets of reads to obtain 2 complete reads from each radiologist. Data were analyzed in R version 4.0.2.ResultsTwo hundred thirty patients underwent revision hip arthroscopy between March 2014 and December 2019. Twelve patients had both an MRI and an MRA of the operated hip performed between their primary and revision surgeries. Time between primary and revision hip arthroscopy was 2.0 ± 1.5 years (R: .3-6.3). Time between MRI and MRA was .6 ± .6 years (R: .0-1.6). Sensitivity for detecting hip capsular defects was significantly higher for MRA than for MRI (87.5%, 95% CI: [68,96] vs 50%, 95% CI: [31,69], respectively; P = .008).ConclusionsThis retrospective review demonstrates that MRA has higher sensitivity than MRI in detecting surgically confirmed capsular defects. MRA may be more helpful in identifying capsular defects in patients presenting with hip instability symptoms who have had a previous hip arthroscopy.Level of EvidenceLevel IV, diagnostic case series.

The Value Added of Advanced Imaging in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Pathology

Pathology of the triangular fibrocartilage complex is a prevalent cause of ulnar-sided wrist pain that presents a diagnostic challenge. We hypothesized that a history and physical examination (H&P) would be more cost-effective alone or with diagnostic injection than with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or magnetic resonance arthrogram (MRA) in the diagnosis and treatment of a symptomatic triangular fibrocartilage complex abnormality. A simple-chain decision analysis model was constructed to assess simulated subjects with ulnar-sided wrist pain and normal radiographs using several diagnostic algorithms: H&P alone, H&P+ injection, H&P with delayed advanced imaging (MRI or MRA), and H&P+ injection with delayed advanced imaging (MRI or MRA). Three years after diagnosis, effectiveness was calculated in Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand-adjusted life years. Costs were extracted from a commercial insurance database using US dollars. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis with 10,000 second-order trials with sampling of parameter distributions was performed. One-way and 2-way sensitivity analyses were performed. All strategies had similar mean effectiveness between 2.228 and 2.232 Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand-adjusted life years, with mean costs ranging from $5,584 (H&P alone) to $5,980 (H&P, injection, and MRA). History and physical examination alone or with injection were the most cost-effective strategies. History and physical examination alone was the most preferred diagnostic strategy, though H&P+ injection and H&P with delayed MRA were preferred with adjustments in willingness-to-pay and parameter inputs. As willingness-to-pay increased considerably (>$65,000 per Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand-adjusted life year), inclusion of MRA became the most favorable strategy. Advanced imaging adds costs and provides minimal increases in effectiveness in the diagnosis and treatment of a symptomatic triangular fibrocartilage complex abnormality. The most cost-effective strategy is H&P, with or without diagnostic injection. Magnetic resonance arthrogram may be favored in situations with a high willingness-to-pay or poor examination characteristics. Economic/Decision Analysis IV.

High Incidence of Anterior Shoulder Pain in Young Athletes Undergoing Arthroscopic Posterior Labral Repair for Posterior Shoulder Instability

PurposeThe purposes of this study were to determine the incidence of anterior shoulder pain in young athletes undergoing arthroscopic posterior labral repair for symptomatic unidirectional posterior shoulder instability and in patients with preoperative anterior shoulder pain treated without biceps tenodesis at the time of arthroscopic posterior labral repair who underwent a revision biceps tenodesis procedure at short-term follow up.MethodsA retrospective review was performed at a single institution over a 24-month period. The study included young patients who underwent an arthroscopic posterior labral repair for symptomatic unidirectional posterior shoulder instability. The electronic medical record, magnetic resonance arthrograms, and arthroscopic images were reviewed to exclude patients with posterior labral tears with anterior labral tear or SLAP (superior labrum anterior-to-posterior) tear extension on advanced imaging and arthroscopic examination. Data collected included the presence of preoperative tenderness to palpation of the biceps tendon in the groove, the results of a preoperative Speed test, postoperative Subjective Shoulder Value, the presence of postoperative anterior shoulder pain, and the need for a secondary biceps tenodesis.ResultsWe identified 65 patients who underwent arthroscopic labral repair for posterior shoulder instability. From this cohort, 26 patients with symptomatic unidirectional posterior shoulder instability underwent an arthroscopic posterior labral repair. The incidence of preoperative anterior shoulder pain with Zone 2 biceps groove tenderness and a positive Speed test was identified in 20 of 26 patients (76.9%). Of 26 patients, 5 (19%) had concomitant biceps tenodesis. The median postoperative Subjective Shoulder Value was 80 (interquartile range, 60-90) at median follow-up of 2.1 years. Of the 20 patients with preoperative anterior shoulder pain, 8 of 20 (40%) reported persistent anterior pain. One patient (4.7%) underwent a secondary biceps tenodesis.ConclusionsThere is a high incidence of anterior shoulder pain and Zone 2 biceps groove tenderness in patients undergoing isolated arthroscopic posterior labral repair for unidirectional posterior shoulder instability. At short-term follow-up, few patients required a secondary biceps tenodesis procedure; however, 30% of patients had persistent anterior shoulder pain.Level of EvidenceLevel IV, retrospective diagnostic case series.

The Everted Acetabular Labrum: Patho-anatomy, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Arthroscopic Findings of a Native Variant

The purpose of this study was to introduce a native labral variant, the everted acetabular labrum, and to describe the patho-anatomy, magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance arthrogram (MRI/MRA) characteristics and the arthroscopic findings in this condition. All primary hip arthroscopy procedures performed by the senior author between June 2013 and January 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. An everted acetabular labrum was identified as a segment of labrum that lacked apposition to the femoral head with the hip off traction. All everted labra were treated with labral advancement and repair with or without augmentation or reconstruction. The labrum-to-femoral head distance was measured in 3T MRI/MRA at the 1-2 o'clock position. A random selection of 38 hips without an everted labrum served as controls to compare radiographic parameters. A total of 68 hips were identified as having an everted labrum during the study period (mean age, 29.1 years), and 55 hips had advanced imaging available for review. MRI/MRA scans revealed the everted labrum to have a triangular shape in 17 hips (31%) and a blunted/round shape in 38 hips (69%), which differed significantly from controls (triangular 25/38 [66%], blunted 13/38 [34%], P < 0.001). The average labrum-to-femoral head distance was 1.4 mm for everted labra versus 0.0 mm for controls (P < 0.0001) and the mean labral lengths and widths were significantly shorter than those of controls (both P < 0.01). Of the hips, 8 underwent labral reconstruction or augmentation, and 61 underwent labral advancement/repair. The everted acetabular labrum is a native variant that is identifiable during hip arthroscopy by assessing the labral seal off traction. Preoperative MRI/MRA findings can be highly predictive of an everted labrum. Surgical treatment includes labral advancement and repair or reconstruction to restore contact between the labrum and the femoral head. III, retrospective comparative study.

Influence of the glenoid track and glenoid bone loss on the apprehension test for shoulder instability.

BackgroundThe investigation of Hill-Sachs and bony Bankart lesions continues to evolve. Patients with large bone lesions can present with a positive apprehension test even at ranges below 45° of abduction and external rotation of the shoulder. Modern concepts, such as glenoid track and quantification of glenoid bone loss, have been increasingly applied to shoulder instability. The objective of this study was to assess the correlation of the glenoid track and glenoid bone loss on the apprehension test conducted at 0°, 45°, and 90° of shoulder abduction.MethodsNinety-four shoulders of 90 patients with anterior glenohumeral instability were retrospectively assessed. The apprehension test was performed at 0°, 45°, and 90° of shoulder abduction. Computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or magnetic resonance arthrogram scans were performed to calculate the glenoid track and glenoid bone loss. A descriptive analysis, an association analysis, and a logistic regression analysis were used in this study. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the influence of glenoid track and glenoid bone loss when the apprehension test was positive in lower degrees of abduction.ResultsA positive apprehension test at 0°, 45°, and 90° of abduction revealed significant association with off-track lesions, glenoid bone losses greater than 13.5%, and bipolar bone lesions. Shoulders classified as off-track were 36.4 times more likely to test positive at 0°, 45°, and 90° than on-track shoulders. The logistic regression analysis revealed that the positive apprehension test at 0°, 45°, and 90° of abduction seems to be more influenced by off-track lesions than by glenoid bone loss greater than the 13.5% threshold.ConclusionShoulders with a positive apprehension test at 0°, 45°, and 90° are significantly associated with off-track lesions, bipolar bone lesions, and glenoid bone losses greater than 13.5%.