Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope Research Articles

Comparison of the HugeMed video laryngoscope with the Macintosh direct laryngoscope for nasotracheal tracheal intubation in children undergoing dental treatment: a randomized controlled clinical study

ABSTRACT Objectives The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the HugeMed® videolaryngoscope with a direct Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation. Methods Eighty-eight children aged 4–10 years were randomly assigned to either the HugeMed® videolaryngoscope (HVL) or the Macintosh direct laryngoscope (MDL) group. Intubation difficulty, glottic view grade, time-to-intubation, number of tracheal intubation attempts, use of external laryngeal manipulation and Magill forceps, recovery time, pediatric-anesthesia-delirium-scale (PAEDS) scores, pain due to tracheal intubation, and laryngeal bleeding were evaluated. Results Easy tracheal intubation incidence was higher in the HVL group than that in the MDL group (p = 0.001). Glottic view was better in the HVL group as compared to the MDL group (p = 0.027). There was no difference between the groups in terms of time-to-tracheal intubation, number of tracheal intubation attempts, Magill forceps usage, pain, and bleeding due to tracheal intubation. The need for external laryngeal manipulation (p = 0.004) and PAEDS scores (p = 0.006) were higher in the MDL group than those in the HVL group. Conclusion HugeMed® videolaryngoscope may provide easier tracheal intubation, create a better glottic view, and significantly reduce the need for additional manipulation compared to the Macintosh direct laryngoscope, for nasotracheal intubation. Clinical trial registration www.clinicaltrial.gov identifier is NCT05121597

Macintosh-style videolaryngoscope use for tracheal intubation in elective surgical patients revisited: a sub-analysis of the 2022 Cochrane review data

The Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis published in 2022 that compared videolaryngoscopy (VL) with direct laryngoscopy (DL) for facilitating tracheal intubation in adults found that all three types of VL device (Macintosh-style, hyper-angulated and channeled) reduced the risk of failed intubation and increased the likelihood of first-pass success. We report the findings of a subgroup re-analysis of the 2022 Cochrane meta-analysis data focusing on the Macintosh-style VL group. This was undertaken to establish whether sufficient evidence exists to guide airway managers in making purchasing decisions for their local institutions based upon individual device-specific performance. This re-analysis confirmed the superiority of Macintosh-style VL over Macintosh DL in elective surgical patients, with similar efficacy demonstrated between the Macintosh-style VL devices examined. Thus, when selecting which VL device(s) to purchase for their hospital, airway managers decisions are likely to remain focused upon issues such as financial costs, portability, cleaning schedules and previous device experience.

Comparing Alba 3D printed video laryngoscope vs. video laryngoscope C-MAC® vs. direct macintosh laryngoscope operated by medical students: A randomized, crossover, manikin study

Endotracheal intubation is the gold standard for airway management. Direct laryngoscopy is a difficult procedure with a high failure rate. A 3D printed video laryngoscope can be used as a more affordable replacement for a laryngoscope. The aim of this study was to evaluate the success rate and time of endotracheal intubation in manikins using the Alba 3D printed video laryngoscope, the C-MAC video laryngoscope and the Macintosh operated by medical students. This study was conducted using a cross sectional randomised study method involving 36 medical students. This study found that the mean endotracheal intubation time using Alba 3D Print was significantly shorter than using Macintosh, but not better than C-MAC (VL3D-25 vs LDM-50.5 vs VLC-21.5 s) with a p-value of <0.001. The success rate of endotracheal intubation using Alba 3D moulds was significantly better than using Macintosh, but not statistically significant when compared to C-MAC (VL3D-91.7% vs LDM-97.2% vs VLC-75%) with p-value <0.05). This study concluded that the use of Alba 3D prints has a better success rate and time compared to Macinctosh and can be an affordable alternative to commercial video laryngoscopes such as C-MAC for educational purposes.

Impact of Universal Use of the McGrath Videolaryngoscope as a Device for All Intubations in the Cardiac Operating Room. A Prospective Before-After VIDEOLAR-CAR Study

Tracheal intubation in cardiac surgery patients has a higher incidence of difficult laryngoscopic views compared with patients undergoing other types of surgery. The authors hypothesized that using the McGrath Mac videolaryngoscope as the first intubation option for cardiac surgery patients improves the percentage of patients with "easy intubation" compared with using a direct Macintosh laryngoscope. A prospective, observational, before-after study. At a tertiary-care hospital. One thousand one hundred nine patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery were intubated using, as the first option, a Macintosh laryngoscope (preinterventional phase) or a McGrath Mac videolaryngoscope (interventional phase). The main objective was to assess whether the use of the McGrath videolaryngoscope, as the first intubation option, improves the percentage of patients with "easy intubation," defined as successful intubation on the first attempt, modified Cormack-Lehane grades of I or IIa, and the absence of the need for adjuvant airway devices. A total of 1,109 patients were included, 801 in the noninterventional phase and 308 in the interventional phase. The incidence of "easy intubation" was 93% in the interventional phase versus 78% in the noninterventional phase (p < 0.001). First-success-rate intubation was higher in the interventional phase (304/308; 98.7%) compared with the noninterventional phase (754/801, 94.1%; p = 0.005). Intubation in the interventional phase showed decreases in the incidence of difficult laryngoscopy (12/308 [3.9%] v 157/801 [19.6%]; p < 0.001), as well as moderate or difficult intubation (5/308 [1.6%] v 57/801 [7.1%]; p < 0.001). The use of the McGrath videolaryngoscope as the first intubation option for tracheal intubation in cardiac surgery improves the percentage of patients with "easy" intubation," increasing glottic view and first-success-rate intubation and decreasing the incidence of moderate or difficult intubation.

A prospective randomised study to compare the efficacy of Medicam pediatric video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope as an intubating device in pediatric patients: Videolaryngoscopy in pediatric airway

Introduction: Airway management in paediatric patients is always a challenging task due to limited functional reserve. Recently, many airway devices have been utilized with varied success rates. The Medicam Paediatric Video Laryngoscope (MPVL) is a recent addition that may significantly impact paediatric airway outcomes. Hence, the present study was designed to assess the efficacy of MPVL and the Macintosh direct laryngoscope in terms of intubation characteristics. Methods: Following ethical approval and informed consent, this prospective, randomized study included sixty ASA I and II patients of either sex aged between 2 and 10 years of age. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: Medicam Paediatric Video Laryngocope and Direct Laringocopy (n = 30 each), to be intubated with the Medicam Paediatric video laryngoscope and Macintosh direct laryngoscope, respectively. The primary outcome was intubation time, while the secondary outcome was first attempt success rate, Cormack Lehane grade, and ease of intubation. Results: The mean time to intubation in group MPVL was 16.0 ± 2.88 seconds, and in group DL was 12.33 ± 2.72 seconds (p-value &lt; 0.05). Cormack-Lehane grade 1 was significantly higher in Group MPVL than Group DL (p = 0.04). The two devices were comparable in terms of first-attempt success rate and ease of intubation. No complications were observed except in one patient in the DL group. Conclusion: MPVL provides better glottis visualization and a trend towards a higher first attempt success rate at the expense of prolonged intubation time. However, the time difference regarding intubation was not clinically significant.

Comparative Evaluation of Direct Laryngoscopy Versus GlideScope for the Purpose of Laryngoscopy Management and Intubation in Candidates of Cesarean Delivery with General Anesthesia.

The present study aimed at comparing the hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and initiation of intubation with either direct or video-assisted laryngoscopy. This double-blind clinical trial was performed on 90 pregnant women candidates for cesarean section under general anesthesia. The participants were divided into two groups. In the first group, intubation was performed using direct Macintosh laryngoscope (MCL group). The second group underwent intubation using the GlideScope video laryngoscope (GSL group). Then, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), the percentage of the saturation of peripheral oxygen (SpO2), the time-to-intubation (TTI), and the number of intubation attempts were recorded. SBP, DBP, and MAP in the MCL group were significantly higher than GSL group 1, 3, and 5 min after laryngoscopy (P < 0.05). HR in the MCL group with the mean of 118.44 ± 15.53 bpm was significantly higher than that the GSL group with the mean of 110.11 ± 16.68 bpm only 3 min after laryngoscopy (P = 0.016). The TTI in the MCL group was significantly longer than that of the GSL group (12.80 ± 1.86 vs. 10.15 ± 2.61; P = 0.001). The frequency of the first intubation attempt in the GSL group with 91.1% was significantly higher than that the MCL group with 84.4% (P = 0.003). It seems that the GSL technique is a better choice to conduct laryngoscopy with more success in intubation and a higher stability of the patients' hemodynamic status.

Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh Laryngoscope in Tracheal Intubation: An Updated Systematic Review.

(1) Background: In the last few years, many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared direct Macintosh laryngoscopy with McGrath videolaryngoscopy in order to assess the potential benefits of the latter; the results were sometimes controversial. (2) Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search to identify our articles according to inclusion and exclusion criteria: to be included, each study had to be a prospective randomized trial or comparison between the McGrath videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope in an adult population. We did not include manikin trials or studies involving double-lumen tubes. (3) Results: 10 studies met the inclusion criteria necessary. In total, 655 patients were intubated with the McGrath and 629 with the Macintosh. In total, 1268 of 1284 patients were successfully intubated, showing equivalent results for the two devices: 648 of 655 patients with the McGrath videolaryngoscope and 620 of 629 patients with the Macintosh laryngoscope. No differences were noted in terms of hemodynamic changes or the incidence of adverse events. (4) Conclusions: We can assert that the McGrath videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope, even if with equivalent tracheal intubation results, supplement each other.

Sanyar Video Laryngoscope Improved Time and First Pass Success of Tracheal Intubation in Intensive Care Unit in Compared to Direct Laryngoscopy

Background: Airway management and tracheal intubation in the ICU is a difficult procedure that may be concomitant with major complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of the SANYAR ® video laryngoscope(S-VL) on laryngeal view and first Pass Success of tracheal Intubation compared with direct laryngoscopy.&#x0D; Methods: This comparative, prospective clinical study was conducted on 120 adult patients in a single-center, in a surgical ICU under the supervision of an anesthesiologist in a university hospital. Difficult airway predictors, glottic view, first Pass Success of tracheal Intubation and time of intubation were evaluated with Macintosh laryngoscopy (ML) or the SANYAR® Video Laryngoscope(S-VL).&#x0D; Results: Tracheal intubation was performed in 58 critically ill patients using ML and 62 patients using S-VL. According to Cormack and Lehane (C&amp;L) grading glottic visualization was more difficult using ML (41%, C&amp;L grade 3 and 4) compared with S-VL (13%, C&amp;L grade 3 and 4) p&lt;0.001. Intubation of trachea was more successful in the first attempt, in patients with at least one difficult airway predictor with a S-VL compared to ML (87% vs. 38%; P = 0.001), time of intubation was also shorter by using S-VL.&#x0D; Conclusion: Among critically ill patients in the intensive care unit, who require intubation, the SANYAR video laryngoscopy improved glottis view compared to the Macintosh direct laryngoscopy and first-pass orotracheal intubation rate especially in patients with potentially difficult airways.

A pilot, prospective trial of IntuBrite® versus Macintosh direct laryngoscopy for paramedic endotracheal intubation in out of hospital cardiac arrest

BackgroundIntubation in the case of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is one of the most difficult procedures for Emergency Medical Services (EMS). The use of a laryngoscope with a dual light source is an interesting alternative to classic laryngoscopes. However, there are as yet no prospective data concerning the use of double light direct laryngoscopy (DL) by paramedics in traditional ground ambulance agencies in OHCA.MethodsWe performed a non-blinded trial in a single EMS in Poland within ambulances crews, comparing time and first pass success (FPS) for endotracheal intubation (ETI) in DL using the IntuBrite® (INT) and Macintosh laryngoscope (MCL) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). We collected both patient and provider demographic information along with intubation details. The time and success rates were compared using an intention-to-treat analysis.ResultsOver a period of 40 months, a total of 86 intubations were performed using 42 INT and 44 MCL based on an intention-to-treat analysis. The FPS time of the ETI attempt (13.49 vs. 15.55 s) using an INT which was shorter than MCL was used (p < 0.05). First attempt success (34/42, 80.9% vs. 29/44, 64.4%) was comparable for INT and MCL with no statistical significance.ConclusionsWe found a statistically significant difference in intubation attempt time when the INT laryngoscope was used. Intubation first attempt success rates with INT and MCL were comparable with no statistical significance during CPR performed by paramedics.Trial RegistrationTrial was registered in Clinical Trials: NCT05607836 (10/28/2022)

Comparing the learning curve of laryngoscopy using macintosh laryngoscope with or without video assistance for tracheal intubation by novices after manikin training

ObjectiveNo studies in the literature have compared video-assisted MacIntosh laryngoscope with conventional MacIntosh laryngoscope in teaching tracheal intubation to novices. Hence, we conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare the learning curve of direct MacIntosh laryngoscope with and without video assistance for tracheal intubation by novices after manikin training. MethodsTwelve novices were included in the study. Out of 12, six novices were taught tracheal intubation on manikin using a MacIntosh laryngoscope, and the other six using a video-assisted MacIntosh laryngoscope. In Group ML(n = 30), novices trained with MacIntosh laryngoscope performed tracheal intubation in 5 patients, each using the same device. In Group VML(n = 30), novices who were acquainted with video-assisted MacIntosh laryngoscope performed tracheal intubation in 5 patients, each using the same device. ResultsThe percentage of 0, ≤5, and >5 Intubation difficulty scale (IDS) were 0.00%, 43.33%, and 56.67% in Group ML and 0.00%, 80.0%, and 20.00% in Group VML, respectively. The success rate of performing tracheal intubation in Group ML was 40.00%(12/30), and the success rate of Group VML was 70.00%(21/30). The difference in the IDS score and success rate of intubation were found to be statistically significant. The mean intubation time was 93.77 ± 15.80 s in Group ML and 92.33 ± 19.06 s in Group VML. The visualization of the glottis by Cormack Lehane grading (CLG) in Group ML(n = 30) was grade I in 14(46.67%) patients and grade II in 16(53.33%) patients. In Group VML (n = 30), CLG grade I accounted for 18(60.00%) patients, grade II in 12(40%) patients. The intubation time and CLG were statistically insignificant between the two groups. ConclusionNovices trained and performed tracheal intubation with video-assisted MacIntosh laryngoscope had a greater success rate on the first attempt and lower IDS score than those trained with MacIntosh laryngoscope.

Comparison of Three Video Laryngoscopes and Direct Laryngoscopy for Emergency Endotracheal Intubation While Wearing PPE-AGP: A Randomized, Crossover, Simulation Trial

The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated changes in the safety protocols of endotracheal intubation at every level of care. This study aimed to compare the first-pass success rates (FPS) and intubation times (IT) of three video laryngoscopes (VL) and direct laryngoscopy (DL) for simulated COVID-19 patient emergency intubation (EI). The study was a prospective, randomized, crossover trial. Fifty-three active paramedics performed endotracheal intubation with the I-viewTM VL, UESCOPE® VL, ProVu® VL and Macintosh direct laryngoscope (MAC) wearing personal protective equipment for aerosol-generating procedures (PPE-AGP) on a manikin with normal airway conditions. The longest IT was noted when the UESCOPE® (29.4 s) and ProVu® (27.7 s) VL were used. The median IT for I-view was 17.4 s and for MAC DL 17.9 s. The FPS rates were 88.6%, 81.1%, 83.0% and 84.9%, respectively, for I-view, ProVu®, UESCOPE® and MAC DL. The difficulty of EI attempts showed a statistically significant difference between UESCOPE® and ProVu®. The intubation times performed by paramedics in PPE-AGP using UESCOPE® and ProVu® were significantly longer than those with the I-view and Macintosh laryngoscopes. The use of VL by prehospital providers in PPE did not result in more effective EI than the use of a Macintosh laryngoscope.

Endotracheal Intubation with King Vision Video Laryngoscope vs Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope in ICU: A Comparative Evaluation of Performance and Outcomes.

Endotracheal intubation to protect airway patency in critically ill patients with the use of videolaryngoscopes has been emerging and their expertise to handle is crucial. Our study focuses on the performance and outcomes of King Vision video laryngoscope (KVVL) in intensive care unit (ICU) compared to Macintosh direct laryngoscope (DL). This comparative study was conducted by randomizing 143 critically ill patients in ICU into two groups: KVVL and Macintosh DL (n = 73; n = 70). The intubation difficulty was assessed by Mallampati score III or IV, apnea syndrome (obstructive), cervical spine limitation, opening mouth <3 cm, coma, hypoxia, anesthesiologist nontrained (MACOCHA) score. The primary endpoint was the glottic view measured by Cormack-Lehane (CL) grading. The secondary endpoints were a first-pass success, the time required for intubation, airway morbidities, and manipulations required. The KVVL group showed the primary endpoint of significantly improved glottic visualization measured in terms of CL grading compared with the Macintosh DL group (p < 0.001). In the KVVL group, the first pass success rate was higher (95.7%) compared to the Macintosh DL group (81.4%) (p < 0.05). The time required for intubation in the KVVL group (28.77 ± 2.63 seconds) was significantly less compared with Macintosh DL (38.84 ± 2.72 seconds) group (p < 0.001). The airway morbidities observed were similar in both groups (p = 0.5) and the manipulation required for endotracheal intubation was significantly less (p < 0.05) in our KVVL group (16 cases; 23%) compared to the Macintosh DL group (8 cases; 10%). We found that the performance and outcomes of KVVL in intubating critically ill ICU patients were promising when handled by experienced operators who are experts in anesthesiology and airway management. Dharanindra M, Jedge PP, Patil VC, Kulkarni SS, Shah J, Iyer S, et al. Endotracheal Intubation with King Vision Video Laryngoscope vs Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope in ICU: A Comparative Evaluation of Performance and Outcomes. Indian J Crit Care Med 2023;27(2):101-106.

Comparative evaluation of C-MAC and McGrath MAC videolaryngoscopes with Macintosh direct laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation in adult patients undergoing elective surgeries.

Videolaryngoscopes have an undisputed role in difficult airway management, but their role in routine intubation scenarios remains underappreciated. McGrath MAC is a lightweight laryngoscope with a disposable blade. It remains to be proven if it performs as efficiently as the reusable videolaryngoscopes like C-MAC and whether it has an advantage over standard Macintosh laryngoscope in predicted normal airways. We recruited 180 adult patients and randomly divided them into three groups for intubation with either Macintosh laryngoscope (Group-A), C-MAC (Group-B), and McGrath (Group-C). The primary objective was to compare the first attempt success rate. Secondary objectives included Cormack-Lehane (CL) grades, laryngoscopy time, intubation time, ease of intubation, need for optimization manoeuver, and the number of passes to place the endotracheal tube. The two videolaryngoscopes provided a superior first attempt success rate as compared to Macintosh laryngoscope (P = 0.027). The CL grade-I was 100% in group B, 41.7% in group-A and 90% in group-C (B vs C; P = 0.037). Laryngoscopy time was 9.9 ± 2.5 s, 12.6 ± 0.8 s, and 13.1 ± 0.8 s for groups A, B, and C, respectively (B vs C; P = 0.001). Intubation time was 24.4 ± 12 s, 28.3 ± 1.9 s, and 37.3 ± 5.8 s for groups A, B, and C, respectively (P < 0.0001). The number of tube passes was highest in group C. Videolaryngoscopes provided a superior glottic view and resulted in a superior first attempt success rate as compared to Macintosh laryngoscope. When comparing the two videolaryngoscopes, C-MAC resulted in better intubation characteristics (shorter intubation time, better glottic views, and higher first-attempt success rates) and should be preferred over McGrath for intubation in adult patients with normal airways.

First Attempt Intubation Success Rate with Video Laryngoscope after Failed Direct Laryngoscopy

Objectives: Several unsuccessful intubation attempts prompted the authors of this study to investigate the efficacy of the C-MAC video laryngoscope. Methods: After first attempts with a Macintosh direct laryngoscope were unsuccessful, patients were ultimately able to be intubated with the help of C-MAC laryngoscopes. It was determined whether or not there was a correlation between the positive outcome of C-MAC catheterization and the laryngeal photographs that were produced by the device. Study design: Descriptive Cross sectional Study Settings:Department of Anesthesia, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre Karachi Study duration:January 2021 to January 2022 Results: Cormack and Lehane gave the Macintosh laryngoscope ratings of III and IV, however CMAC gave scores of I to 13 patients, II to 7 patients, and III to one patient. Tracheal intubation with CMAC was successful in 16 patients (76.2% percent) on the first try, and in 5 patients on the second attempt (23.8% percent). Only a trace of blood was discovered on the blades of three patients (14 percent). Conclusion: During routine anaesthetic treatment, a C-MAC video laryngoscope can successfully overcome unsuccessful intubations. The C-MAC video laryngoscope is a key recovery instrument that is both efficient and safe in the case of an intubation failure.

Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation.

Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation.

Video-assisted versus macintosh direct laryngoscopy for intubation of obese patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the usefulness of video-assisted (VL) approaches with the Macintosh direct laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation of obese patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Studies were obtained via a systematic search of SCOPUS, Medline, Web of Science, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central databases. The polled relative risks (RRs) odds ratios (ODs) or standard mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with a random–effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate the influence of VL types on the association. RESULTS: First intubation attempt success rate in VL and DL group varied and amounted to 94.7% vs 89.5% respectively (OR = 2.04; 95% CI: 1.21–3.42; p = 0.007) and overall intubation success rate was 99.0% vs 97.5% respectively (OR = 2.20; 95% CI: 0.45–10.67; p = 0.33). Intubation time which was 48.0 ± 37.7 for VL and 48.4 ± 37.5 seconds for DL (SMD = 0.14; 95% CI: –0.33–0.61; p = 0.56). Cormack-Lehane 1 or 2 grade during intubation using VL was observed in 95.9% of cases and was statistically significantly higher than in the case of direct laryngoscopy (79.6%; OR = 6.68; 95% CI: 3.32–13.42; p &lt; 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggests that video-assisted intubation may be superior to conventional intubation in an obese patient population due to a higher first–attempt success rate, better glottis visibility, and a lower rate of intubation-related injuries.

Comparative Evaluation of C-MAC Videolaryngoscope with Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope in Patients with Normal Airway Predictors.

Video laryngoscopes (VL) assist in securing the airway faster and more accurately in difficult airways. However, data regarding its usefulness in patients with normal airways are sparse. We designed this study to compare the ease and success of endotracheal intubation between C-MAC and Macintosh direct laryngoscope (DL) in adult patients with no anticipated airway difficulty. The design involves prospective randomized case - control study. One hundred and twenty adult patients with predicted normal airway were randomized into two groups and were intubated using VL (C-MAC VL) and DL (Macintosh DL), respectively. The Cormack-Lehane (CL) grade, time taken for intubation, attempts taken (number), and need for laryngeal maneuvers or stylets were recorded and analyzed for statistical significance. Thirty-eight patients in the DL group and 48 patients in the VL group had CL I view, 20 patients in the DL group and 16 patients in the VL group had CL II, and two patients in the DL group had CL III view. None of the patients in Group VL had CL III view. In seven out of 60 cases in the DL group, difficulty was experienced during insertion of the laryngoscope blade as compared to two cases out of 60 in the VL group. The mean time taken for intubation was lesser in Group DL (28.48 s) as compared to 39.3 s in Group VL. Nine patients in Group DL and 16 patients in Group VL required external laryngeal manipulation. Stylets were used, in seven patients in group DL and in 11 patients in group VL. In patients with a predicted normal airway, C-MAC provides a better glottic view compared to Macintosh DL. Time taken for intubation using the C-MAC video laryngoscope was more. However, success rates on the first attempt at endotracheal intubation and the number of intubation attempts with either laryngoscope were similar.

Diabetes Mellitus Olan Hastalarda C-MAC Video Laringoskop ve Macintosh Laringoskopun Elektif Trakeal Entübasyon İçin Karşılaştırılması: Randomize Kontrollü Çalışma

Objective: C-MAC video laryngoscope and Macintosh direct laryngoscope were compared in terms of intubation conditions, during elective tracheal intubation in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) who have a high risk for difficult airway. Material and Methods: One hundred and ten American Society of Anesthesiologist physical class II-III patients with DM undergoing elective surgery were randomized to be intubated using C-MAC video laryngoscope or Macintosh laryngoscope. Glottic view Cormack Lehane (CL) score, intubation time, intubation difficulty scale (IDS) score, and first attempt intubation success were compared. Results: Similar intubation times were detected [Macintosh laryngoscope: 39.6±30.1 seconds; C-MAC: 46.7±35.4 seconds (p=0.098). C-MAC provided significantly better CL scores]. Grade 1 CL laryngeal view was observed in 37 (68%) C-MAC vs. 26 (47.3%) Macintosh laryngoscope intubations (p=0.04). An IDS score of >5 was determined in 11 (20.4%) patients with C-MAC and in 10 (18.2%) with Macintosh laryngoscope (p=0.04), indicating an overall 20.1% moderate-to-severe intubation difficulty (p=0.536). The mean IDS score was 3.2±2.9 and 2.4±3.3 with C-MAC and Macintosh laryngoscopes, (p=0.04). First-attempt intubation success was 83.3% vs. 87.0% with C-MAC vs. Macintosh laryngoscope (p=0.786). Conclusion: In patients with DM, CMAC provided improved glottis visualization, similar intubation time and first-attempt intubation success as a first-attempt intubation device compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope. However IDS scores were higher with the C-MAC. The incidence of actual intubation difficulty was found 20.1% in this diabetic study population.

Nasotracheal intubation performance with the mcgrath videolaryngoscope versus macintosh laryngoscope in oral and maxillofacial surgery- An observational study.

Nasotracheal intubation is the main route to secure the airway in oral and maxillofacial surgery patients. This study was aimed to compare the intubation times and glottis visualization of McGrath video laryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope for routine nasotracheal intubation. Records of seventy-one ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) I-II patients were evaluated and allocated into two groups (McGrath video laryngoscope (VL) and Macintosh groups). Intubation times, modified intubation difficulty scale (MIDS) scores, and hemodynamic parameters (heart rate and mean arterial pressure) were compared after the anesthesia induction and the intubation. Mean intubation time in the McGrath group (24.9 ± 5.9 seconds) was significantly lower than that of the Macintosh group (28 ± 6.2 seconds; P = 0.037). Magill forceps were needed less in the McGrath group compared to the Macintosh group (13.89% vs. 42.86%; P = 0.009). Total MIDS scores were similar (P = 0.778). There was no significant difference in the hemodynamic parameters between the groups. The McGrath VL significantly reduced the intubation time and the use of Magill forceps compared with Macintosh direct laryngoscope and can be utilised effectively for routine nasotracheal intubation.

Direct vs. Video-Laryngoscopy for Intubation by Paramedics of Simulated COVID-19 Patients under Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Randomized Crossover Trial.

A safe way of securing the airway with an endotracheal tube is one of the priorities of an advanced cardiovascular life support algorithm for suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patients. The aim of this study was to compare intubation success rates (ISR) and intubation time (IT) of different laryngoscopes for simulated COVID-19 patients under cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The study was designed as a prospective, randomized, crossover trial. Fifty four active paramedics performed endotracheal intubation with a Macintosh direct laryngoscope (MAC) and McGrath videolaryngoscope (McGrath) with and without personal protective equipment (PPE). Without PPE, ISRs were 87% and 98% for MAC and McGrath, respectively (p = 0.32). ITs were 22.5 s (IQR: 19–26) and 19.5 s (IQR: 17–21) for MAC and McGrath, respectively (p = 0.005). With PPE, first-pass ISR were 30% and 89% with MAC and McGrath, respectively (p < 0.001). The overall success rates were 83% vs. 100% (p = 0.002). Median ITs were 34.0 s (IQR: 29.5–38.5) and 24.8 s (IQR: 21–29) for MAC and McGrath, respectively (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the McGrath videolaryngoscope appears to possess significant advantages over the Macintosh direct laryngoscope when used by paramedics in suspected or confirmed COVID-19 intubation scenarios.