mAb In Patients Research Articles

Ibrutinib followed by ofatumumab consolidation in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL): GELLC-7 trial from the Spanish group of CLL (GELLC)

BTK inhibitors have been concurrently administered with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, the optimal regimen for combining these two drugs remains pending. This multi-center phase 2 study aimed to analyze whether consolidation with ofatumumab improved the response in patients with CLL receiving front-line treatment with ibrutinib. Patients received 12 cycles of ibrutinib monotherapy. Those who achieved CR after this induction were maintained on ibrutinib. Conversely, those who did not attain CR continued with ibrutinib in addition to a consolidation, which involved 7 doses of ofatumumab. The primary objective was the complete response (CR) rate at cycle 20. This study is registered within the EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT 2016-004937-26). Between September 8, 2017, and May 21, 2018, 84 patients (median age, 69 years) were included. After completion of 12 cycles of ibrutinib (n=80), 4 patients (5%) were in CR, 67 (84%) in partial response (PR), and 6 patients (7%) had a PR with lymphocytosis (PRL). After consolidation with ofatumumab, 20 patients improved the response from PR to CR and 6 patients with PRL obtained a PR. Seventy-one patients (85%) completed 20 cycles of treatment, with a CR rate of 24/71 (34%). According to the intention-to-treat analysis at cycle 20, the ORR was 69/84 (82.2%), with a CRR of 24/84 (28.6%). Progression-free survival and overall survival at 48-months were 89.9% (CI: 82.4-95.5) and 92.2% (CI: 85.3-97.1), respectively. These findings underscore the potential for a consolidation strategy in CLL, wherein the addition of a mAb in patients with low tumor burden might enhance the quality of the response. The study was funded by Janssen that also supplied ibrutinib, whereas ofatumumab was supplied by Novartis.

Simultaneous quantification of co-administered trastuzumab and pertuzumab in serum based on nano-surface and molecular-orientation limited (nSMOL) proteolysis.

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are pivotal therapeutic agents for various diseases, and effective treatment hinges on attaining a specific threshold concentration of mAbs in patients. With the rising adoption of combination therapy involving multiple mAbs, there arises a clinical demand for multiplexing assays capable of measuring the concentrations of these mAbs. However, minimizing the complexity of serum samples while achieving rapid and accurate quantification is difficult. In this work, we introduced a novel method termed nano-surface and molecular orientation limited (nSMOL) proteolysis for the fragment of antigen binding (Fab) region-selective proteolysis of co-administered trastuzumab and pertuzumab based on the pore size difference between the protease nanoparticles (∼200 nm) and the resin-captured antibody (∼100 nm). The hydrolyzed peptide fragments were then quantified using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). In this process, the digestion time is shortened, and the produced digestive peptides are greatly reduced, thereby minimizing sample complexity and increasing detection accuracy. Assay linearity was confirmed within the ranges of 0.200-200 μg mL-1 for trastuzumab and 0.300-200 μg mL-1 for pertuzumab. The intra- and inter-day precision was within 9.52% and 8.32%, except for 12.5% and 10.8% for the lower limit of quantitation, and the accuracy (bias%) was within 6.3%. Additionally, other validation parameters were evaluated, and all the results met the acceptance criteria of the guiding principles. Our method demonstrated accuracy and selectivity for the simultaneous determination of trastuzumab and pertuzumab in clinical samples, addressing the limitation of ligand binding assays incapable of simultaneously quantifying mAbs targeting the same receptor. This proposed assay provides a promising technical approach for realizing clinical individualized precise treatment, especially for co-administered mAbs.

Joint Exposure‐Response Analysis of PET Amyloid Plaque Data from the BACE1 Inhibitor Verubecestat and Amyloid mAbs Trials in Prodromal to Moderate Alzheimer’s Disease

AbstractBackgroundPositron‐emission tomography (PET) with amyloid radiotracers allows the quantification of pathological amyloid deposition in brain tissues. An exposure‐response (E‐R) analysis of individual study data of the β‐secretase‐1 inhibitor verubecestat and summary level data of four amyloid mAbs in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) was conducted, to quantify the drug effects and plaque turnover rates and facilitate prediction of unstudied regimens.MethodIndividual (n = 188) verubecestat amyloid‐PET plaque data and exposures from APECS [Egan et.al, 2019] were pooled with summary. amyloid‐PET data and serum exposures from literature for aducanumab [Sevigny J, et al. 2016], donanemab [Lowe SL, et al. 2021, Lily ADPD, 2021], gantenerumab [Klein G, et al. 2019, Portron A, et al. 2020] and lecanemab [Swanson CJ, et al. 2021]. Amyloid plaque levels in SUVR units were converted to Centiloid [Klunk WE, et al. 2015]. All data were fit simultaneously in a joint model by nonlinear mixed‐effects modelingResultAn indirect response (turnover) model with verubecestat inhibiting plaque formation, and amyloid mAbs stimulating plaque removal well represented the available data (Figure 1). All plaque time course data from natural progression (control arms), β‐secretase‐1 inhibition and amyloid mAb treatment arms were well described by a joint model. The plaque turnover was estimated to be 0.00028 per day, corresponding to a half‐life of plaque of ∼ 6.8 years. Verubecestat AUC50 was estimated as 0.313 uM*h, commensurate to a 93.5% reduction in plaque formation at the typical 40 mg exposure and consistent with the >60% reductions in CSF Aβ40 and 42 observed in APECS. Aducanumab 10 mpk Q4W, donanemab 1400 mg Q4W, lencanemab 10 mpk Q2W, and gantenerumab 1200 mg SC Q4W were estimated to results in 13.5‐, 16.4‐, 16.6‐, and 12.6‐fold increases in plaque removal rate, respectively.ConclusionThe joint turnover model, linking drug exposure with amyloid plaque load, was adequate to describe natural progression and treatment response, and allows for estimation of the underlying turnover rate. This approach improves cross‐study comparisons and prediction of alternative regimens and therapeutic approaches by accounting for differences in baseline plaque load, dosing and titration regimens, and mechanism of action.

Incidence and symptomatology of ARIA

AbstractBackgroundTo summarize available evidence on ARIAs from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) testing anti–β‐amyloid mAbs in patients with AD and to provide a comprehensive update about risk factors, clinical correlates, and implications for withholding and reinitiating treatment.MethodA literature search of MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library and a search of ClinicalTrials.gov were conducted through September 15, 2021. Publications describing RCTs, secondary analyses of RCT data, and case reports of ARIAs were included. Strengths of clinical data were graded according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence‐Based Medicine.ResultTwenty‐two RCTs, 11 secondary analyses of RCTs, and 1 case report, including in total 15 508 adult patients (8483 women [54.7%]; mean [SD] age, 69.6 [8.3] years) were selected for inclusion. Signal alterations that included parenchymal edema and sulcal effusion leading to transient hyperintensities on fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery and T2‐weighted sequences were termed ARIA‐E, whereas those consisting of hemosiderin deposits, including parenchymal microhemorrhages and leptomeningeal superficial siderosis, were termed ARIA‐H. Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) ε4 genotype was the main risk factor for both ARIA types; ARIA‐E incidence was further associated with treatment dose, affecting the 55%of ApoE ε4 carriers in the high‐dose aducanumab treatment group. Both ARIA types manifested early during study course, and symptomatic cases accounted for the 6.1% to 39.3%of ARIA‐E cases at higher treatment doses across RCTs, whereas ARIA‐H cases were generally asymptomatic. Most ARIA‐E cases resolved with treatment withholding, although corticosteroid administration was required anecdotally. ARIA‐E recurrence after dose reinitiation or adjustment varied from 13.8% to 25.6%across RCTs.ConclusionEvidence suggests that ARIAs are frequent, mostly asymptomatic collateral events of amyloid‐modifying therapies, highlighting the need for standardized clinical and neuroradiological management protocols in real‐world clinical settings.

Cell-based passive immunization for protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection

BackgroundImmunologically impaired individuals respond poorly to vaccines, highlighting the need for additional strategies to protect these vulnerable populations from COVID-19. While monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have emerged as promising tools to manage infectious diseases, the transient lifespan of neutralizing mAbs in patients limits their ability to confer lasting, passive prophylaxis from SARS-CoV-2. Here, we attempted to solve this problem by combining cell and mAb engineering in a way that provides durable immune protection against viral infection using safe and universal cell therapy.MethodsMouse embryonic stem cells equipped with our FailSafe™ and induced allogeneic cell tolerance technologies were engineered to express factors that potently neutralize SARS-CoV-2, which we call ‘neutralizing biologics’ (nBios). We subcutaneously transplanted the transgenic cells into mice and longitudinally assessed the ability of the cells to deliver nBios into circulation. To do so, we quantified plasma nBio concentrations and SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing activity over time in transplant recipients. Finally, using similar cell engineering strategies, we genetically modified FailSafe™ human-induced pluripotent stem cells to express SARS-CoV-2 nBios.ResultsTransgenic mouse embryonic stem cells engineered for safety and allogeneic-acceptance can secrete functional and potent SARS-CoV-2 nBios. As a dormant, subcutaneous tissue, the transgenic cells and their differentiated derivatives long-term deliver a supply of protective nBio titers in vivo. Moving toward clinical relevance, we also show that human-induced pluripotent stem cells, similarly engineered for safety, can secrete highly potent nBios.ConclusionsTogether, these findings show the promise and potential of using ‘off-the-shelf’ cell products that secrete neutralizing antibodies for sustained protective immunity against current and future viral pathogens of public health significance.

Response to Biologic Drugs in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Antidrug Antibodies

There are conflicting data on the association of antidrug antibodies with response to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To analyze the association of antidrug antibodies with response to treatment for RA. This cohort study analyzed data from the ABI-RA (Anti-Biopharmaceutical Immunization: Prediction and Analysis of Clinical Relevance to Minimize the Risk of Immunization in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients) multicentric, open, prospective study of patients with RA from 27 recruiting centers in 4 European countries (France, Italy, the Netherlands, and the UK). Eligible patients were 18 years or older, had RA diagnosis, and were initiating a new bDMARD. Recruitment spanned from March 3, 2014, to June 21, 2016. The study was completed in June 2018, and data were analyzed in June 2022. Patients were treated with a new bDMARD: adalimumab, infliximab (grouped as anti-tumor necrosis factor [TNF] monoclonal antibodies [mAbs]), etanercept, tocilizumab, and rituximab according to the choice of the treating physician. The primary outcome was the association of antidrug antibody positivity with EULAR (European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology; formerly, European League Against Rheumatism) response to treatment at month 12 assessed through univariate logistic regression. The secondary end points were the EULAR response at month 6 and at visits from month 6 to months 15 to 18 using generalized estimating equation models. Detection of antidrug antibody serum levels was performed at months 1, 3, 6, 12, and 15 to 18 using electrochemiluminescence (Meso Scale Discovery) and drug concentration for anti-TNF mAbs, and etanercept in the serum was measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Of the 254 patients recruited, 230 (mean [SD] age, 54.3 [13.7] years; 177 females [77.0%]) were analyzed. At month 12, antidrug antibody positivity was 38.2% in patients who were treated with anti-TNF mAbs, 6.1% with etanercept, 50.0% with rituximab, and 20.0% with tocilizumab. There was an inverse association between antidrug antibody positivity (odds ratio [OR], 0.19; 95% CI, 0.09-0.38; P < .001) directed against all biologic drugs and EULAR response at month 12. Analyzing all the visits starting at month 6 using generalized estimating equation models confirmed the inverse association between antidrug antibody positivity and EULAR response (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.18-0.65; P < .001). A similar association was found for tocilizumab alone (OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04-0.83; P = .03). In the multivariable analysis, antidrug antibodies, body mass index, and rheumatoid factor were independently inversely associated with response to treatment. There was a significantly higher drug concentration of anti-TNF mAbs in patients with antidrug antibody-negative vs antidrug antibody-positive status (mean difference, -9.6 [95% CI, -12.4 to -6.9] mg/L; P < 001). Drug concentrations of etanercept (mean difference, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.2-1.2] mg/L; P = .005) and adalimumab (mean difference, 1.8 [95% CI, 0.4-3.2] mg/L; P = .01) were lower in nonresponders vs responders. Methotrexate comedication at baseline was inversely associated with antidrug antibodies (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.25-1.00; P = .05). Results of this prospective cohort study suggest an association between antidrug antibodies and nonresponse to bDMARDs in patients with RA. Monitoring antidrug antibodies could be considered in the treatment of these patients, particularly nonresponders to biologic RA drugs.

Treatment of hemiplegic migraine with anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies: A case series in a tertiary-care headache center.

Hemiplegic migraine (HM) is a subtype of migraine with aura that includes motor weakness; such headaches can be excruciating. The presence of not only headache but also aura symptoms of HM increase the burden on patients, and the treatment of HM is sometimes challenging. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway are novel migraine preventive treatments that have shown promising efficacy in patients with migraine; however, there have been no reports regarding their efficacy in HM to date. Six patients with HM were treated with galcanezumab in a tertiary-care headache center. After 3 months of treatment, the number of monthly days with headache of at least moderate severity was reduced in three patients. The number of days each month with weakness was also reduced in four patients. Furthermore, the Patient's Global Impression of Change and change in Migraine Disability Assessment total score, were improved in five of the six patients after the treatment; however, the change from baseline in days with bothersome symptoms did not show any specific trends in our patients. Notably, no adverse events were reported during the treatments. The mechanism underlying the improvement in aura symptoms in our patients is not clear; however, we speculate that a small amount of CGRP mAbs have a direct mode of action in the central nervous system; alternatively, blocking the CGRP pathway in the periphery may secondarily inhibit cortical spreading depression. While prudence must be practiced, galcanezumab was still generally effective in HM and well tolerated. Further prospective clinical studies will more clearly elucidate the effects of CGRP mAbs in patients with HM.

Tumor lysis syndrome associated with monoclonal antibodies in patients with multiple myeloma: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FAERS database.

Although some tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) cases have been reported with multiple myeloma patients taking monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), the association between TLS and mAbs remains mostly unknown. We aim to investigate the association between TLS and mAbs and describe clinical features. We conducted a disproportionality analysis to investigate the link between mAbs and TLS by excluding known confounders and compared with other anticancer drugs. The association between mAbs and TLS was evaluated using information component (IC). Drug-drug interaction signals were calculated based on the Ω shrinkage measure. Parametric distribution with goodness-of-fit test was used for the reported time-to-onset analysis. From 2016 Q1, to 2022 Q4, a total of 274 TLS with mAbs were reported in the FAERS database. 27.0% of TLS cases with mAbs died and 20.1% occurred life-threatening situation. Daratumumab, elotuzumab, and belantamab mafodotin presented a robust disproportionate signal of TLS after excluding known confounders (IC025 >0). Daratumumab had the highest disproportionate signal of TLS among all anti-cancer drugs for multiple myeloma. Reported time-to-onset analysis showed the median days for TLS with daratumumab, isatuximab, elotuzumab and belantamab mafodotin were 1.5, 14.5, 5.5, 5.5 days, respectively. . The drug-drug interaction analysis showed the co-administration of drugs known to increase urate, induce hyperkalemia or hypocalcemia elevated the reporting frequency for TLS with mAbs (Ω025 >0). Our post-marketing pharmacovigilance analysis detected the reporting association of TLS and mAbs in patients with multiple myeloma. Additional studies with robust epidemiological study designs that can validate these findings are warranted.

SOX plus bevacizumab versus SOX plus cetuximab as initial treatment of recurrent advanced colorectal cancer with wild-type KRAS (MCSGO-1107 study): A phase II randomized study.

136 Background: Although clinical outcomes of chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) have improved over the last decade, the standard-of-care chemotherapy regimens for patients with unresectable RAS wild-type CRC remain to be discussed. The aim of this study was to compare S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) + bevacizumab (B-mab) with SOX + cetuximab (C-mab) in patients with previously untreated, unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic CRC with wild-type KRAS. Methods: This phase II, randomized, open-label, multicenter study compared the efficacy and safety of SOX+B-mab with SOX+C-mab in patients with previously untreated, unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic CRC with wild-type KRAS. Forty-five patients were enrolled in this study between February 2012 and October 2016. Results: The overall response rate (ORR) for the SOX+B-mab group was 59.1%, whereas that for the SOX+C-mab group was 43.5% (p = 0.29). The disease control rate (DCR) for the SOX+B-mab group was 90.9%, whereas that of the SOX+C-mab group was 91.3% (p = 0.96). For all patients, median OS were 25.3 months (95% CI: 16.5–39.4 months) in the SOX+B-mab group and 15.5 months (95% CI: 7.30–30.4 months, p = 0.167) in the SOX+C-mab group. Median PFS were 11.7 months (95% CI: 7.37–18.2 months) in the SOX+B-mab group and 5.5 months (95% CI: 3.36–10.1 months, p = 0.077) in the SOX+C-mab group. In the SOX+B-mab group, OS and PFS were not significantly different with and without early tumor shrinkage (ETS). However, in the SOX+C-mab group, patients with ETS had significantly better OS (30.4 months [95% CI: 8.0–44.3 months, p = 0.032]) and PFS (12.0 months [95% CI: 5.1–19.7 months, p = 0.003]) than those without ETS. Conclusions: The safety and efficacy of SOX+B-mab and SOX+C-mab as initial treatment for unresectable CRC with wild-type KRAS were almost the same. ETS was more correlated with PFS in the SOX+C-mab group than in the SOX+B-mab group, suggesting consideration of treatment strategy based on ETS may improve patient prognosis, especially in patients receiving the SOX+C-mab regimen. Clinical trial information: UMIN000006706 .

Switching OnabotulinumtoxinA to Monoclonal Anti-CGRP Antibodies in Drug-Resistant Chronic Migraine.

OnabotulinumtoxinA (BTX-A) and anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP mAbs) are approved drugs for chronic migraine (CM), a difficult-to-treat condition. Optimization of CM patient management by choosing the best options and determining appropriate time for switching or adding concomitant treatments are highly needed. Evaluate clinical response to anti-CGRP mAbs in patients who switched from BTX-A due to ineffectiveness defined by different cut-offs and assess the retention rate, effectiveness, and safety of both drugs within the first 9 months of treatment. A monocentric, cohort study, enrolling patients withCM, resistant to several preventive treatments, first treated with BTX-A and then with anti-CGRP mAbs with two observational phases of 9 months preceded by respective baseline. First, the retention rate and effectiveness of both treatments were measured in all patients. A second analysis assessed effectiveness in patients stratified according to <50 or <30% response rate to BTX-A. The absolute change from baseline in monthly headache days (MHDs), response rate, analgesic use, and persistence in medication overuse (MO) at 3, 6, and 9 months of treatment were recorded. Last observation carried forward (LOCF)analyses, including all patients and assuming no further changes after discontinuation, were performed for all outcomes. Of the 78 enrolled patients (80.8% female, and 89.7% with MO at baseline), 32 (41.0%) received erenumab, 32 (41.0%) galcanezumab, and 14 (18.0%) fremanezumab. Retention rate was 62.2 and 91.0% for BTX-A and 76.9 and 96.2%, for anti-CGRP mAbs at 3 and 9 months of treatment, respectively. At 9 months of treatment, 22.4% of BTX-A patients and 65.0% of anti-CGRP mAbs patients achieved a ≥50% response rate. Anti-CGRP mAbs reduced MHDs, AMN, and AMDs, and decreased the number of MO patients at 9 months. In patients stratified according to <50 or <30% response rate to BTX-A, response rate (≥50% response at 9 months) to anti-CGRP was 62.9 and 57.9%, respectively. LOCF analyses confirmed these findings. No serious adverse events (AEs) were recorded and only two patients discontinued treatment due to AEs. Difficult-to-treat CM patients who discontinued BTX-A and received anti-CGRP mAbs showed a substantial clinical improvement in migraine-related outcomes. Switching to an anti-CGRP mAb appears to be a viable option in patients with insufficient response after the first 2 cycles with BTX-A. The appropriate variables, cut-offs, and timing to define ineffectiveness and the best time to switch or combine therapies for difficult-to-treat CM need to be investigated further.

Estimation of cystatin C and inflammation marker levels in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with microalbuminuria

Serum cystatin C (CstC) is a type of protein produced by cells at the normal level; when the kidney is in normal condition or function, it inhibits the interstitial cysteine protease. The objective of the current study is to evaluate the levels of CstC and inflammation markers in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with early diagnosed microalbuminuria (MBA) and find if there is a relationship between CstC and different parameters. Fifty T2DM patients with a mean age of 44.41 ± 6.51 years in the Al-Yarmouk Teaching Hospital were recruited according to the presence of MBA, and they were compared with 40 nondiabetic individuals with a mean age of 42.22 ± 5.33 years as control. Serum CstC, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) were estimated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The mean values of serum CstC, IL-6, and TNF-α in the diabetic patients with MBA were all significantly increased compared to those of the nondiabetic individuals (P &lt; 0.001). In T2DM patients with MBA, there were positive correlations between serum CstC levels and serum creatinine, creatinine urea, and cystatin-c/creatinine ratio. Similarly, there was a strong positive correlation between serum CstC and serum of the inflammatory markers IL-6 and TNF-α. However, there was a negative association between CstC and the estimated glomerular filtration rate-Larson equation. The results of the current study suggest that serum CstC, IL-6, and TNF-α may potentially serve as biomarkers for the early detection of MAB in patients with T2DM.

Scientific journey to the first FDA-approved drug for eosinophilic esophagitis

When eosinophilia was first associated with esophagitis, it was thought to reflect gastroesophageal reflux disease, especially given the efficacy of reflux medications to abate esophageal eosinophilia in many individuals. Subsequent studies demonstrated disease remittance with amino acid-based formulas and conversely induction of esophageal eosinophilia in mice following allergen challenge. These results, along with the finding that proton pump inhibitors alleviated esophageal eosinophilia by an anti-inflammatory mechanism, turned attention away from an acid-induced pathogenesis and established eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) as a separate disease entity driven by allergic inflammation. The disease underpinnings were elucidated by analysis of esophageal transcriptomic profiling, revealing gene signatures orchestrated by type 2 cytokine signaling, mainly IL-13. Preclinical studies showed that IL-13 overproduction was sufficient to induce EoE-like changes in mice and human exvivo systems and conversely that inhibiting IL-13 signaling attenuated these processes. An early proof-of-principle study with a humanized anti-IL-13 mAb in patients with EoE revealed correction of the EoE transcriptome and attenuation of esophageal eosinophilia, providing a rationale for advancing anti-type 2 cytokine therapy for EoE. Dupilumab, a precision therapeutic mAb that blocks the shared IL-13 and IL-4 receptor, is the first drug to advance through clinical trials and receive US Food and Drug Administration approval for EoE. The ability of dupilumab to improve clinical, histologic, endoscopic, and molecular features of EoE and garner US Food and Drug Administration approval is a victory for science, rare diseases, patients, and advocacy and provides a framework for developing additional EoE treatments and approved treatments for eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease beyond the esophagus.

33781 Sustained and durable response up to 24 weeks after last dose observed in a phase 2a study (NCT03754309) of amlitelimab (KY1005, SAR445229) a novel nondepleting anti-OX40Ligand (OX40L) mAb in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD)

Introduction: Amlitelimab (KY1005) is novel human nondepleting IgG4 monoclonal antibody blocking OX40Ligand which is found on antigen presenting cells (APCs) including dendritic cells. By targeting APCs it was hypothesised amlitelimab could potentially have long and durable anti-inflammatory effect in AD. Materials and methods: Kymab, a Sanofi Company, funded a Ph2a RCT (NCT03754309) in 89 moderate-to-severe AD patients (EASI>16, vIGA-AD>2 at baseline (BL)) with an inadequate response or intolerance of topical treatments. 1:1:1 randomization to intravenous amlitelimab low dose (LD, 200 mg loading/100 mg maintenance every 4 weeks), high dose (HD, 500 mg/250 mg Q4W) or placebo (PBO). Last dose was at Week 12. To assess long-term durability of response in patients achieving vIGA-AD0/1 at Week 16 efficacy assessments were collected to Week 36. Co-primary endpoints were % change in EASI from baseline and incidence of TEAEs at Week 16. Results: 88 patients received study medication. 59 evaluable patients competed Week 16. Both co-primary endpoints were met. 24 patients (12 LD (44%), 10 HD (37%) and 2 PBO (8%)) achieved a vIGA-AD 0/1 at Week 16. At Week 24, 83% (n = 10) LD, 90% (n = 9) HD, and 50% (n = 1) PBO maintained vIGA-AD0/1. 3 patients withdrew by Week 36 (2 LD, 1 HD). 21 patients remained with 67% (n = 8) LD, 70% (n = 7) HD, and 50% (n = 1) PBO maintaining a vIGA-AD0/1. Conclusions: This Ph2a study has demonstrated that Amlitelimab monotherapy targeting APCs is not only associated with a marked clinical improvement at Week16 but in patients achieving ‘clear’ or ‘almost clear’ skin (vIGA0/1) a sustained response up to 24 weeks after the last dose was maintained. A Phase 2b study is planned.

Impact of Anti-amyloid-β Monoclonal Antibodies on the Pathology and Clinical Profile of Alzheimer's Disease: A Focus on Aducanumab and Lecanemab.

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most prevalent form of age-related dementia in the world, and its main pathological features consist of amyloid-β (Aβ) plaque deposits and neurofibrillary tangles formed by hyperphosphorylated tau protein. So far, only a few AD treatments approved have been applied in the clinic, but the effects of these drugs are limited only for partial symptomatic relief to patients with AD and are unable to alter AD progression. Later, all efforts for AD treatments with targeting the pathogenic factors were unsuccessful over the past decades, which suggested that the pathogenesis of AD is complex. Recently, disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) that can change the underlying pathophysiology of AD, with anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies (mabs) (e.g., aducanumab, bapineuzumab, gantenerumab, solanezumab, and lecanemab) have been developed successively and conducted in clinical trials based on the theory that a systemic failure of cell-mediated Aβ clearance contributes to AD occurrence and progression. In the review, we summarized recent studies on the therapeutic effects and clinical trial results of these mabs in patients with AD. Specifically, we focused on the discussion of the impact of aducanumab and lecanemab on AD pathology and clinical profiles. The review provides a possible evidence for applying immunotherapy with anti-Aβ mabs in AD and analyzes lessons learned from these clinical trials in order to further study the therapeutic and adverse effects of these anti-Aβ mabs on AD.

Comprehensive Treatment of Hematological Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection Including Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Monoclonal Antibodies: A Single-Center Experience Case Series.

Simple SummarySARS-CoV-2 causes coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and poses a global health burden. Treatment strategies remain limited and mainly consist of dexamethasone; antiviral agents, such as remdesivir and molnupiravir; and SARS-CoV-2-specific monoclonal antibodies (mABs), including bamlanivimab, casirivimab/imdevimab combination, and, most recently, sotrovimab. SARS-CoV-2 mABs target specific proteins on the viral surface. Patients with hematologic malignancies represent an especially vulnerable cohort. Evidence for the use of SARS-CoV-2 mABs in these patients is scarce, creating an imbalance between urgently needed therapeutic strategies and a lack of randomized controlled trials. In this study, we summarize the characteristics of tolerability and clinical benefits of SARS-CoV-2 mAB application in patients with COVID-19 and hematologic malignancies admitted to our university hospital in Germany. We hope to provide some evidence that may contribute to the management of patients with hematologic malignancies in a world where COVID-19 remains a risk.Patients with hematologic malignancies are at high risk of exacerbated condition and higher mortality from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Bamlanivimab, casirivimab/imdevimab combination, and sotrovimab are monoclonal antibodies (mABs) that can reduce the risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization. Clinical effectiveness of bamlanivimab and casirivimab/imdevimab combination has been shown for the Delta variant (B.1.617.2), but the effectiveness of the latter treatment against the Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) has been suggested to be reduced. However, the tolerability and clinical usage of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-specific mABs in patients with hematologic malignancies are less specified. We present a retrospective case series analysis of all SARS-CoV-2-infected patients with hematologic malignancies who received SARS-CoV-2-specific mABs at our facility between February and mid-December 2021. A total of 13 COVID-19 patients (pts) with at least one malignant hematologic diagnosis received SARS-CoV-2-specific mABs at our facility, with 3 pts receiving bamlanivimab and 10 pts receiving casirivimab/imdevimab combination. We observed SARS-CoV-2 clearance in five cases. Furthermore, we observed a reduction in the necessity for oxygen supplementation in five cases where the application was administered off-label. To the best of our knowledge, we present the largest collection of anecdotal cases of SARS-CoV-2-specific monoclonal antibody use in patients with hematological malignancies. Potential benefit of mABs may be reduced duration and/or clearance of persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Latest clinical evidence about the effect of PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia: an updated meta-analysis.

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is the most common autosomal genetic disease of cholesterol metabolism disorder. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) monoclonal antibody (mAb) is a new target lipid-regulating drug related to cholesterol metabolism that has been developed in recent years. The reported rate of reduction varies widely, and comprehensive assessments of efficacy and safety are lacking. Therefore, we conducted this study to investigate the clinical effect of PCSK9 mAbs in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia to provide a theoretical reference for clinical practice. We analysed the clinical data of patients, including the percentage change in LDL-C and the incidence rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs), from selected articles. Weighted mean differences (WMDs), risk ratios (RRs), and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated to compare the endpoints. The results showed that, compared with placebo, the PCSK9 mAb reduced the percentage change in LDL-C in FH patients (WMD = -45.52, 95% CI: -49.70 to -41.34, I2 = 99.6%). In addition, there was no significant difference between the experimental and placebo groups in the incidence of TEAEs (RR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.97 to 1.10, I2 = 19.1%) and SAEs (RR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.72 to 1.44, I2 = 0.0%). Overall, PSCK9 mAbs are an effective and safe method of LDL-C reduction in patients with FH.

Microalbuminuria on admission for acute exacerbation of COPD as a predictor of all-cause mortality and future exacerbations

ObjectivesMicroalbuminuria (MAB) is a sensitive biomarker of cardiovascular risk that is directly associated with cardiovascular events and mortality. Recent studies have evaluated the presence of MAB in patients with stable...

Recent advancements in clearance monitoring of monoclonal antibodies in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases

ABSTRACT Introduction Less than 50% of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) receiving monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy achieve endoscopic remission. Poor outcomes may indicate a need for dose optimization. During therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), drug concentrations are measured, and when found too low, dosage regimen escalations are performed. To date, benefits of TDM of mAbs in patients with IBD are uncertain. Areas covered This review presents an overview of what clearance monitoring is, how it can be performed, and why and when it may be valuable in treating patients with IBD. Virtual patients were used for illustration. A literature search was performed to summarize current evidence for clearance monitoring in IBD and other disease settings. Expert opinion During clearance monitoring, mAb clearance is calculated and monitored over time. Higher mAb clearance in patients with IBD has been associated with higher target load (target-mediated drug disposition), protein-losing enteropathy (fecal drug loss), and immunogenicity. Although not prospectively confirmed, clearance monitoring might facilitate identification of (yet) asymptomatic disease flares or presence of (yet) undetectable anti-drug antibodies. Furthermore, clearance monitoring may be used to predict treatment outcomes. Whether dosage regimen adjustments can modify the clearance time course and the treatment outcome is to be determined.

Uptake of KRAS Testing and Anti-EGFR Antibody Use for Colorectal Cancer in the VA.

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with stage IV CRC diagnosed in the VA 2006-2015. We gathered clinical, demographic, molecular, and treatment data from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse and 29 commercial laboratories. We performed multivariable analyses of associations between patient characteristics, KRAS testing, and EGFR mAb treatment. Among 5,943 patients diagnosed with stage IV CRC, only 1,053 (17.7%) had KRAS testing. Testing rates increased from 2.3% in 2006 to 28.4% in 2013. In multivariable regression, older patients (odds ratio, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.32 for ≥ age 85 v < 45 years) and those treated in the Northeast and South regions were less likely, and those treated at high-volume CRC centers were more likely to have KRAS testing (odds ratio, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.48 to 3.63). Rates of potentially guideline discordant care were high: 64.3% (321/499) of KRAS wild-type (WT) went untreated with EGFR mAb and 8.8% (401/4,570) with no KRAS testing received EGFR mAb. Among KRAS-WT patients, survival was better for patients who received EGFR mAb treatment (29.6 v 18.8 months; P < .001). We found underuse of KRAS testing in advanced CRC, especially among older patients and those treated at lower-volume CRC centers. We found high rates of potentially guideline discordant underuse of EGFR mAb in patients with KRAS-WT tumors. Efforts to understand barriers to precision oncology are needed to maximize patient benefit.

Randomized phase II study of SOX+B-mab versus SOX+C-mab in patients with previously untreated recurrent advanced colorectal cancer with wild-type KRAS (MCSGO-1107 study)

BackgroundAlthough chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has improved, the standard chemotherapy regimens for patients with RAS wild-type mCRC remain debated. This study aimed to compare S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) + bevacizumab (B-mab) with SOX + cetuximab (C-mab) in patients with previously untreated recurrent advanced CRC with wild-type KRAS.MethodsThis randomized phase II, open-label, multicenter study compared the efficacy and safety of SOX+B-mab with SOX+C-mab in patients with previously untreated advanced CRC with wild-type KRAS. Between February 2012 and October 2016, 45 patients were enrolled.ResultsOverall response rates were 59.1 and 43.5% (p = 0.29) and disease control rates were 90.9 and 91.3% (p = 0.96) in the SOX+B-mab and SOX+C-mab groups, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was 25.3 and 15.5 months (HR = 0.607, p = 0.167) and median progression-free survival (PFS) were 11.7 and 5.5 months (HR = 0.558, p = 0.077) in the SOX+B-mab and SOX+C-mab groups, respectively. The OS and PFS of patients with early tumor shrinkage (ETS) were not significantly different in the SOX+B-mab group. However, they were significantly better when ETS was ≥20 in the SOX+C-mab group (p = 0.032 and p = 0.003, respectively).ConclusionsThe efficacy and safety of SOX+B-mab and SOX+C-mab for wild-type KRAS recurrent advanced CRC as first-line chemotherapy were almost the same. Consideration of the treatment strategy based on ETS may improve patient prognosis, especially in patients receiving the SOX+C-mab regimen.Trial registrationUMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000006706).Date of registration: NOV/11/2011.URL of trial registry record:https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000007920