mITT Analysis Research Articles

Morbidity and quality of life of totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: a multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial (CKLASS01).

There is a paucity of confirmatory randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effectiveness of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for early gastric cancer (EGC). A phase III, prospective, multi-center RCT was conducted, wherein patients (n = 442) with clinical stage I gastric cancer eligible for laparoscopic distal gastrectomy were randomized 1:1 to the TLDG or the LADG group. Postoperative morbidity and quality of life (QoL) were compared. In total, 422 patients were assessed (TLDG, 216; LADG, 206) in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis. The morbidity rate did not differ significantly between the two groups (TLDG, 6.0%; LADG, 5.8%; P = 0.93). The 90-day mortality rate was comparable between the groups (TLDG, 0.5%; LADG, 0.0%; P > 0.99). TLDG was significantly associated with a lower pain score compared with LADG in patients with a BMI of ≥ 25 kg/m2 (P = 0.002) at 24 h postoperatively. Moreover, TLDG significantly improved QoL in terms of C30 social functioning at 3 and 6 months (P = 0.03 and P = 0.04), C30 global health status at 3 months (P = 0.02), and STO22 body image at 3 months (P = 0.01), with differences dissipating at 12 months. TLDG is not superior to LADG in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality, but it provides better C30 social functioning at 3 and 6 months, C30 global health status and STO22 body image at 3 months, and reduces early postoperative pain for patients with a BMI of ≥ 25 kg/m2. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03393182.

Cyclosporin A as an Add-On Therapy to a Corticosteroid-Based Background Treatment in Patients with COVID-19: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background: In susceptible hosts, SARS-CoV2-induced hyperinflammation accounts for an increased mortality. The search of adjuvant immunomodulatory therapies has been ongoing ever since the pandemic outbreak. Aim: Our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy of cyclosporin A (CsA) as an add-on therapy to the standard of care (SoC) in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods: We conducted a randomized clinical trial in patients admitted to eight Spanish tertiary hospitals. Patients were stratified into two severity categories and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a corticosteroid-based standard therapy with or without CsA. The primary endpoint was FiO2 recovery by Day 12 without relapses. Results: 109 patients were included and randomized, and 98 of them considered for the mITT population (51 assigned to the CsA + SoC group and 47 to the SoC group). A total of 35 (68.6%) patients from the CsA + SoC group and 32 (71.1%) patients from the SoC group reached the primary endpoint in the mITT analysis. No differences were found after stratification into age groups, in the severity level at admission, or in a combination of both. Overall, the time to FiO2 normalization was 7.4 days vs. 7.9 days in the experimental and control groups, respectively. Global mortality was 8.2%. Severe adverse events were uncommon and equally distributed between arms. Conclusion: The addition of CsA did not show differences over a corticosteroid-based treatment in the clinical course of the included patients. A better identification of candidates who will benefit from receiving immunomodulatory drugs is necessary in future studies.

First-line Helicobacter pylori empirical treatment in the Czech Republic (2019–2024) – initial insights from the European registry on H. pylori management (Hp-EuReg)

Summary: Background and Aim: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection remains a significant public health concern worldwide, including in the Czech Republic. The study aims to provide an overview of the current first-line treatment approaches for H. pylori infection in the Czech Republic based on data from the European Registry on H. pylori Management (Hp-EuReg), and to evaluate the most effective treatment regimens. Methods: Hp--EuReg is an international multicentric registry on the management of H. pylori, from which we extracted data from the Czech Republic from 2019 to January 2024. This registry collects demographic information, diagnostic procedures, treatment prescriptions, and outcomes for H. pylori infection management by gastroenterologists. A modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatments. Results: A total of 546 patients from 14 centres in the Czech Republic who receive first-line treatment were analysed. Low-dose (i.e.; 20 mg omeprazole equivalent twice daily) proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) were administered in 89% of patients, and the most common length of treatments was 14 days (40%). The overall mITT effectiveness of first-line treatment was 85%, obtaining 86% when prescriptions were combined either with low-dose (20 mg omeprazole equivalent twice daily), and high dose (80 mg omeprazole equivalent twice daily) PPIs, and 82.5% with standard-dose (40 mg omeprazole equivalent twice daily) PPIs. The effectiveness of 7-day prescriptions was reported to be 83%, lower than that of 10- and 14-day, both of which achieved effectiveness of 86%. The most frequently used treatment scheme was triple therapy with PPI, amoxicillin and clarithromycin, which was used in 67% of patients, reaching 87% effectiveness both with 7- and 14-day prescriptions. Optimal (>90% mITT) effectiveness was obtained with both 10-day, sequential therapy and with 14-day non-bismuth quadruple concomitant therapy including both PPI, amoxicillin, clarithromycin and metronidazole, providing 96% (48/50 patients) and 97% (34/35 patients) cure rates, respectively. The remaining therapies provided all an effectiveness lower than 90%, the lowest one obtained with PPI, clarithromycin and metronidazole (66%; 35/53 patients). Conclusions: In the Czech Republic, the first-line empirical treatment overall effectiveness was suboptimal (<90%); however, 10-day non-bismuth quadruple sequential and 14-day concomitant therapies, both composed of PPI, amoxicillin, clarithromycin and metronidazole, achieved over 90% cure rates. Key-words: Helicobacter pylori – first-line treatment – proton pump inhibitors – Czech Republic

Changing diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes (CDC4G) in Sweden: A stepped wedge cluster randomised trial.

The World Health Organisation (WHO) 2013 diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) has been criticised due to the limited evidence of benefits on pregnancy outcomes in different populations when switching from previously higher glycemic thresholds to the lower WHO-2013 diagnostic criteria. The aim of this study was to determine whether the switch from previous Swedish (SWE-GDM) to the WHO-2013 GDM criteria in Sweden following risk factor-based screening improves pregnancy outcomes. A stepped wedge cluster randomised trial was performed between January 1 and December 31, 2018 in 11 clusters (17 delivery units) across Sweden, including all pregnancies under care and excluding preexisting diabetes, gastric bypass surgery, or multifetal pregnancies from the analysis. After implementation of uniform clinical and laboratory guidelines, a number of clusters were randomised to intervention (switch to WHO-2013 GDM criteria) each month from February to November 2018. The primary outcome was large for gestational age (LGA, defined as birth weight >90th percentile). Other secondary and prespecified outcomes included maternal and neonatal birth complications. Primary analysis was by modified intention to treat (mITT), excluding 3 clusters that were randomised before study start but were unable to implement the intervention. Prespecified subgroup analysis was undertaken among those discordant for the definition of GDM. Multilevel mixed regression models were used to compare outcome LGA between WHO-2013 and SWE-GDM groups adjusted for clusters, time periods, and potential confounders. Multiple imputation was used for missing potential confounding variables. In the mITT analysis, 47 080 pregnancies were included with 6 882 (14.6%) oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) performed. The GDM prevalence increased from 595/22 797 (2.6%) to 1 591/24 283 (6.6%) after the intervention. In the mITT population, the switch was associated with no change in primary outcome LGA (2 790/24 209 (11.5%) versus 2 584/22 707 (11.4%)) producing an adjusted risk ratio (aRR) of 0.97 (95% confidence interval 0.91 to 1.02, p = 0.26). In the subgroup, the prevalence of LGA was 273/956 (28.8%) before and 278/1 239 (22.5%) after the switch, aRR 0.87 (95% CI 0.75 to 1.01, p = 0.076). No serious events were reported. Potential limitations of this trial are mainly due to the trial design, including failure to adhere to guidelines within and between the clusters and influences of unidentified temporal variations. In this study, implementing the WHO-2013 criteria in Sweden with risk factor-based screening did not significantly reduce LGA prevalence defined as birth weight >90th percentile, in the total population, or in the subgroup discordant for the definition of GDM. Future studies are needed to evaluate the effects of treating different glucose thresholds during pregnancy in different populations, with different screening strategies and clinical management guidelines, to optimise women's and children's health in the short and long term. The trial is registered with ISRCTN (41918550).

Efficacy and Safety of Lerodalcibep in Patients With or at High Risk of Cardiovascular Disease

Recent changes in national and international lipid guidelines for reducing cardiovascular events recommend additional drugs, greater reductions, and lower targets for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) if not attained with statins. The achievement of these targets with proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors has not yet been evaluated in a randomized clinical trial. To evaluate the 52-week safety and efficacy of lerodalcibep, a small anti-PCSK9-binding protein, in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) or who are at very high or high risk of CVD and requiring addition LDL-C-lowering treatment. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. The trial was conducted at 66 clinics in 11 countries between April 23, 2021, and November 15, 2023. Individuals 18 years and older taking maximally tolerated statin therapy with LDL-C of 70 mg/dL or greater with CVD or 100 mg/dL or greater if at high risk of CVD were included. Patients were randomized 2:1 to monthly 1.2-mL subcutaneous lerodalcibep, 300 mg, or placebo for 52 weeks. The safety analysis included all randomized patients. The co-primary efficacy end points were percent change from baseline in LDL-C at week 52 and the mean of weeks 50 and 52. Secondary efficacy outcomes included additional lipid apolipoprotein measures and achievement of guideline-recommended LDL-C targets. Of 922 randomized participants (mean [range] age, 64.5 [27-87] years; 414 [44.9%] female; mean [SD] baseline LDL-C, 116.2 [43.5] mg/dL), 811 (88%) completed the trial. The mean (SE) placebo-adjusted reduction in LDL-C with lerodalcibep by modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis was 56.2% (2.2%) at week 52 and 62.7% (1.9%) for the mean of weeks 50 and 52; 49.7% (2.4%) and 55.3% (2.2%) by ITT with imputation using a washout model, and 60.3% (2.3%) and 65.9% (1.9%) by per-protocol analysis at week 52 and the mean of weeks 50 and 52, respectively (P < .001 for all). With lerodalcibep, 555 of 615 participants (90%) achieved both a reduction in LDL-C of 50% or greater and recommended LDL-C targets during the study. Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between lerodalcibep and placebo, except for injection site reactions. These occurred in 42 of 613 participants receiving lerodalcibep (6.9%) compared to 1 of 307 receiving placebo (0.3%), were graded mild or moderate, and did not result in higher discontinuation of treatment, at 26 of 613 (4.2%) and 14 of 307 (4.6%), respectively. Sporadic in vitro antidrug antibodies were detected, which had no impact on free PCSK9 or LDL-C-lowering efficacy. In this trial, lerodalcibep, a novel anti-PCSK9 small binding protein, dosed monthly and stable at ambient temperatures significantly reduced LDL-C in patients with CVD or at high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with a safety profile similar to placebo. These results support long-term use of lerodalcibep in patients with CVD or at high risk of CVD who are unable to achieve adequate LDL-C reduction while receiving maximal tolerated statins alone. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04806893.

Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): Primary outcome of a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

3617 Background: Robotic surgery for rectal cancer is gaining popularity, but persuasive evidence on long-term oncological outcomes is lacking. This multicenter randomized controlled trial compared robotic and conventional laparoscopic surgery regarding surgical quality and long-term oncological outcomes among patients with middle and low rectal cancer. Previously the short-term outcomes of this trial had been reported that robotic surgery had significantly lower circumferential resection margin positivity rate, lower postoperative complication rate, and better postoperative recovery. Now the long-term oncological outcomes were reported. Methods: This superiority trial was undertaken at 11 hospitals in 8 Chinese provinces. Patients with middle (&gt; 5–10 cm from anal verge) or low (0–5 cm from anal verge) rectal adenocarcinoma, cT1–T3 N0–1 or ycT1–T3 Nx after preoperative radio-/chemoradiotherapy, and no evidence of distant metastasis were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive robotic or conventional laparoscopic surgery. The 3-year locoregional recurrence rate was the primary outcome and was compared using modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis. Secondary outcomes included disease-free survival and overall survival. All time-to-event outcomes were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02817126). Results: Between July 2016 and December 2020, 1240 patients were enrolled, and 1171 were included in the mITT analysis (586 in robotic and 585 in laparoscopic group). The pathological TNM stage of the mITT population was 73 (6.2%) patients with complete response, 346 (29.5%) with stage I, 368 (31.4%) with stage II, 384 (32.8%) with stage III. And the median follow-up time was 43.0 months (interquartile range = 36.7 to 60.0), with 34 (2.9%) patients lost to follow-up. The 3-year locoregional recurrence rate in robotic group (1.5%) was significantly lower than in laparoscopic group (4.0%, log-rank p=0.025, hazard ratio = 0.451, 95% confidence interval = 0.221 to 0.921). Robotic group also had significantly higher 3-year disease-free survival rate (87.3% vs. 83.6%, log-rank p=0.035). No significant difference was observed in 3-year overall survival rate (94.8% vs. 93.1%, log-rank p=0.155). Conclusions: Robotic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer significantly reduced locoregional recurrence and improved disease-free survival, compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery. Clinical trial information: NCT02817126 .

Bedaquiline-pretomanid-moxifloxacin-pyrazinamide for drug-sensitive and drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis treatment: a phase 2c, open-label, multicentre, partially randomised controlled trial

The current tuberculosis (TB) drug development pipeline is being re-populated with candidates, including nitroimidazoles such as pretomanid, that exhibit a potential to shorten TB therapy by exerting a bactericidal effect on non-replicating bacilli. Based on results from preclinical and early clinical studies, a four-drug combination of bedaquiline, pretomanid, moxifloxacin, and pyrazinamide (BPaMZ) regimen was identified with treatment-shortening potential for both drug-susceptible (DS) and drug-resistant (DR) TB. This trial aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of BPaMZ. We compared 4 months of BPaMZ to the standard 6 months of isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol (HRZE) in DS-TB. 6 months of BPaMZ was assessed in DR-TB. SimpliciTB was a partially randomised, phase 2c, open-label, clinical trial, recruiting participants at 26 sites in eight countries. Participants aged 18 years or older with pulmonary TB who were sputum smear positive for acid-fast bacilli were eligible for enrolment. Participants with DS-TB had Mycobacterium tuberculosis with sensitivity to rifampicin and isoniazid. Participants with DR-TB had M tuberculosis with resistance to rifampicin, isoniazid, or both. Participants with DS-TB were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by HIV status and cavitation on chest radiograph, using balanced block randomisation with a fixed block size of four. The primary efficacy endpoint was time to sputum culture-negative status by 8 weeks; the key secondary endpoint was unfavourable outcome at week 52. A non-inferiority margin of 12% was chosen for the key secondary outcome. Safety and tolerability outcomes are presented as descriptive analyses. The efficacy analysis population contained patients who received at least one dose of medication and who had efficacy data available and had no major protocol violations. The safety population contained patients who received at least one dose of medication. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03338621) and is completed. Between July 30, 2018, and March 2, 2020, 455 participants were enrolled and received at least one dose of study treatment. 324 (71%) participants were male and 131 (29%) participants were female. 303 participants with DS-TB were randomly assigned to 4 months of BPaMZ (n=150) or HRZE (n=153). In a modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis, by week 8, 122 (84%) of 145 and 70 (47%) of 148 participants were culture-negative on 4 months of BPaMZ and HRZE, respectively, with a hazard ratio for earlier negative status of 2·93 (95% CI 2·17-3·96; p<0·0001). Median time to negative culture (TTN) was 6 weeks (IQR 4-8) on 4 months of BPaMZ and 11 weeks (6-12) on HRZE. 86% of participants with DR-TB receiving 6 months of BPaMZ (n=152) reached culture-negative status by week 8, with a median TTN of 5 weeks (IQR 3-7). At week 52, 120 (83%) of 144, 134 (93%) of 144, and 111 (83%) of 133 on 4 months of BPaMZ, HRZE, and 6 months of BPaMZ had favourable outcomes, respectively. Despite bacteriological efficacy, 4 months of BPaMZ did not meet the non-inferiority margin for the key secondary endpoint in the pre-defined mITT population due to higher withdrawal rates for adverse hepatic events. Non-inferiority was demonstrated in the per-protocol population confirming the effect of withdrawals with 4 months of BPaMZ. At least one liver-related treatment-emergent adverse effect (TEAE) occurred among 45 (30%) participants on 4 months of BPaMZ, 38 (25%) on HRZE, and 33 (22%) on 6 months of BPaMZ. Serious liver-related TEAEs were reported by 20 participants overall; 11 (7%) among those on 4 months of BPaMZ, one (1%) on HRZE, and eight (5%) on 6 months of BPaMZ. The most common reasons for discontinuation of trial treatment were hepatotoxicity (ten participants [2%]), increased hepatic enzymes (nine participants [2%]), QTcF prolongation (three participants [1%]), and hypersensitivity (two participants [<1%]). For DS-TB, BPaMZ successfully met the primary efficacy endpoint of sputum culture conversion. The regimen did not meet the key secondary efficacy endpoint due to adverse events resulting in treatment withdrawal. Our study demonstrated the potential for treatment-shortening efficacy of the BPaMZ regimen for DS-TB and DR-TB, providing clinical validation of a murine model widely used to identify such regimens. It also highlights that novel, treatment-shortening TB treatment regimens require an acceptable toxicity and tolerability profile with minimal monitoring in low-resource and high-burden settings. The increased risk of unpredictable severe hepatic adverse events with 4 months of BPaMZ would be a considerable obstacle to implementation of this regimen in settings with high burdens of TB with limited infrastructure for close surveillance of liver biochemistry. Future research should focus on improving the preclinical and early clinical detection and mitigation of safety issues together and further efforts to optimise shorter treatments. TB Alliance.

Intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring provides no benefit over structured self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes not on prandial insulin, in the context of diabetes self-management education: GLucose monitoring programme SingaporE (GLiMPSE)

ObjectiveWe evaluated the impact of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring(is-CGM)over self-monitoring of blood glucose(SMBG) in the context of diabetes self-management education (DSME) in sub-optimally controlled type 2 diabetes(T2D) in a multi-ethnicsetting. Research Design and MethodRandomized-controlled, open-label trial (NCT04564911), of T2D with HbA1c ≥ 7.5-≤10 %, on oral agents with/without basal insulin was carried out. Intervention arm received 6 weeks(w) continuous is-CGM, followed by one is-CGM/month till 24w. Control arm was advised to perform 4 SMBG/day. Educationwas delivered at weeks 0, 2, 8, 16. Primary outcome: Change in HbA1c from baseline at 24w. Modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis with linear mixed-effect model for repeated measurementswas performed. Results176 subjects, age 55 ± 10.7 years(y), DM duration 11 ± 7.3y, BMI 27.8 ± 5.9 kg/m2, 58 % Male, 29.5 % basal insulin users were analysed. Within each arm,from baseline to 24w, mean HbA1c decreasedby −0.6 % (−6.6.mmol/mol, p-value < 0.01)and weight decreased(isCGM: −1.44 kg; SMBG: −1.25 kg, both p < 0.01). These changes were sustained to one year. However, there wasno significant difference in these parameters between arms (p-value > 0.05). ConclusionIn the context of DSME, use of either SMBG or is-CGM led to improved glycaemia and reduced weight over a period of 24 weeks, sustained to one year.

Effect of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy on postoperative length of hospital stay and complications for pancreatic head or periampullary tumours: a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial

The flexibility of the robotic system in resection and reconstruction provides potential benefits in pancreaticoduodenectomy. Increasingly, robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) has been reported with favourable outcomes, but high-level evidence is still scarce. We aimed to compare the short-term postoperative outcomes of RPD with those of open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD), and hypothesised that postoperative length of hospital stay would be shorter after RPD than after OPD. This multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial was conducted at three high-volume hospitals in China. Patients were considered for participation in this trial if they were aged 18-75 years, had a resectable benign, premalignant, or malignant tumour in the pancreatic head or periampullary region; and were suitable for both RPD and OPD. Patients with distant metastases were excluded. Block randomisation was done with random block sizes of four, stratified by centre. Allocation was concealed via individual, sequentially numbered, opaque sealed envelopes. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to the RPD group or the OPD group in a 1:1 ratio by a masked research assistant. Surgeons and patients were not masked to trial group, but data collectors, postoperative outcome assessors, and data analysts were. All patients underwent RPD or OPD according to previously reported techniques. Participating surgeons had surpassed the learning curves of at least 40 RPD and 60 OPD procedures. The primary outcome was postoperative length of hospital stay, which was analysed in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population. This trial is registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200056809) and is complete. Between March 5 and Dec 20, 2022, 292 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 164 were enrolled and randomly assigned to the RPD group (n=82) or the OPD group (n=82). 161 patients who underwent surgical resection were included in the mITT analysis (81 in the RPD group and 80 in the OPD group). 94 (58%) participants were male and 67 (42%) were female. Postoperative length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the RPD group than in the OPD group (median 11·0 days [IQR 9·0 to 19·5] vs 13·5 days [11·5 to 18·0]; median difference -2·0 [95% CI -4·0 to 0·0]; p=0·029). During a follow-up period of 90 days, six (7%) of 81 patients in the RPD group and five (6%) of 80 patients in the OPD group required readmission. Reasons for readmission were intra-abdominal haemorrhage (one in each group), vomiting (two in the RPD group and one in the OPD group), electrolyte disturbance (one in each group), and fever (two in each group). There were two (1%) in-hospital deaths within 90 days of surgery, one in each group. The postoperative 90-day mortality rate (difference -0·02% [-5·6 to 5·5]; p=1·00) and the incidence of severe complications (ie, Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3; difference -1·5% [-14·5 to 11·4]; p=0·82) were similar between the two groups. For surgeons who had passed the learning curve, RPD was safe and feasible with the advantage of shorter postoperative length of hospital stay than OPD. Future research should focus on the medium-term and long-term outcomes between RPD and OPD. None.

Phase IV study on the use of benzydamine mouthwash in radiation-induced oral mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer.

Oral mucositis (OM) is a main side effect of treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC) and causes severe pain, reduces quality of life, and may interrupt HNC treatment. This study assessed the activity and feasibility of benzydamine mouthwash in the prevention and treatment of radiation-induced OM in patients with HNC during radiation therapy (RT). This phase IV, international, open-label, single-group study conducted from December 2021 to September 2022. In total, 89 patients were enrolled across seven centers in Hungary and Poland. Patients used benzydamine mouthwash at home two to three times daily. Data were collected during clinical visits at baseline (V0, start of RT) and then weekly for seven visits (V1-V7). The safety population and the modified intention-to-treat (m-ITT) analysis sets contained 89 patients; the per protocol (PP) analysis set contained 67 patients. The m-ITT set was 80.9% male; mean age was 61.4 years. At baseline, 73.0% of patients had stage T3-T4, 23.6% had stage T1-T2, 61.8% had stage N2-N3, and 34.9% had stage N0-N1. Within the m-ITT population, 33.7% (n=30) responded to treatment (NRS < 5) during the study. The PP set responded similarly (29.9%). Most patients were treatment compliant (n=77; 86.5%). OM severity was assessed using the WHO OM grading scale. No patients had severe mucositis at baseline or V1. At V7, 34.1% had mild mucositis, 45.1% had moderate mucositis, 15.9% had severe mucositis, and 1.2% had life-threatening mucositis. In total, 26 patients (29.2%) developed severe mucositis during the study period (V2-V7). From V1 to V4, one patient reported hospitalization due to mucositis or associated complications, two patients at V5, three patients at V6, and four patients at 7. This was the first study to assess feasibility of a treatment for radiation-induced OM with benzydamine mouthwash in patients with HNC. Treatment compliance suggested that benzydamine was well tolerated in patients with moderate to severe mucositis. Benzydamine's anesthetic and anti-inflammatory properties might have reduced pain, which potentially influenced patients' compliance with RT. Few patients in the study required hospitalization for OM or an associated complication, suggesting that benzydamine might improve healthcare resource utilization.

P792 Real-world evidence comparison of the effectiveness of ustekinumab with anti-TNF or vedolizumab in ulcerative colitis: 1-year maintenance therapy results from the prospective, observational RUN-UC study

Abstract Background Observational real-world evidence (RWE) studies on the effectiveness of ustekinumab (UST) in ulcerative colitis (UC) are needed in addition to RCTs, which may not represent everyday clinical practice. For this reason, the prospective, controlled, propensity score (PS)-adjusted RUN-UC study was conducted on UC patients starting a new biologic therapy with a follow-up period of up to 3 years. The aim of the present analysis was to evaluate the 1-year maintenance therapy effectiveness of UST vs. anti-TNF or vedolizumab (VDZ). Methods Between 2020-2022, 507 UC patients starting a new therapy with UST or other biologics were enrolled in 34 IBD-experienced centres in Germany. After the exclusion of patients with a stoma, small molecules and missing outcomes, the final sample consisted of 476 patients. Response modified (reduction in partial Mayo score (pMayo) by ≥3 points from baseline to month 12 and a reduction of at least 30% or achievement of remission at month 12), clinical remission (CR) (pMayo ≤ 1 plus a bleeding subscore=0) and steroid-free remission (pMayo ≤ 1, bleeding subscore=0 and no systemic use of steroids or oral budesonide use in the previous 8 weeks) were considered as outcomes. To reduce the effect of confounders, PS adjustment with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was implemented. Health-related QoL was assessed by using the visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) of the EQ-5D. Results A total of 476 UC-patients [147 UST (bio-naïve: 12), 168 anti-TNF (ADA: 32.7%, IFX: 59.5%, GOL: 7.7%) (bio-naïve: 114) and 161 VDZ (bio-naïve: 105)] were included in the analysis. The PS-adjustment eliminated systemic differences in the baseline parameters (UST/anti-TNF/VEDO: 42.2/47.0/50.3% males, 25.2/25.0/19.9% EIMs), in particular, the "bio-experienced" characteristic was also equalised, between the groups. Treatment persistence over 12 months was different between UST (93.9%), VDZ (87.0%) and anti-TNF (75.0%) (Fig. 1). The PS-weighted effectiveness of UST (mITT analysis) in terms of response, clinical and steroid-free remission at month 12 (Tab. 1) was comparable to that of anti-TNF and VDZ, as was also the case without PS-weighting (CR: UST 33.1%, anti-TNF 38.5%, VDZ 38.1%). Patients of all treatment groups showed significant improvements in QoL measured as the EQ-VAS after 12 months of treatment. Conclusion In this prospective RUN-UC study with PS-weighted groups, UST showed similar maintenance effectiveness compared to established biologics in UC (anti-TNF and VDZ) with a relatively higher treatment persistence of UST, probably serving as a proxy for effectiveness, suggesting that additional criteria, such as safety and patients´ profile, may play an important role in the selection of biologics.

Safety and efficacy of nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS) in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma.

348 Background: Nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS) was developed to overcome toxicity issues associated with conventional docetaxel. Docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; DCF) or modified DCF (mDCF) is one of the recommended first-line regimens for patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC). However, majority of the patients experienced grade 3/4 toxicities with DCF regimen using conventional docetaxel. The present study evaluated the safety and efficacy of NDLS-based mDCF/DCF regimens in patients with metastatic GAC. Methods: In this multicentric, open-label, clinical trial, patients with previously untreated metastatic GAC were enrolled. Patients received either mDCF [NDLS 40 mg/m2 on day 1 (D1), C 40 mg/m2 on D2 or D3, 5-FU 400 mg/m2 bolus on D1, leucovorin 400 mg/m2 on D1, 5-FU 1000 mg/m2/day continuous infusion D1 &amp; 2; q2w] for 9 cycles, or DCF [NDLS 75 mg/m2 on D1, C 75 mg/m2 on D1, 5-FU 750 mg/m2/day for 5 days given as continuous infusion; q3w] for 6 cycles. Prophylactic GCSF (Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor)/Peg-GCSF support was allowed in all patients. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) at week 18. Secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety outcomes. Patients were followed up to 1 year. Results: Fifty-two patients were enrolled, with mean (±SD) age of 52 (±9.6) years &amp; male:female ratio of 32:20. Thirty-eight patients qualified for modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis for efficacy evaluation (mDCF: 33; DCF:5). At week 18, ORR was 57.9% &amp; DCR was 81.6% in mITT population. In the per-protocol population (n=26), ORR was 61.5% at 18 weeks (mDCF:63.6%; DCF:50%). Safety set included all 52 patients. Any grade adverse events (AEs) were reported in 90.4% (n=47) of the patients; with 40.4% experiencing grade 3/4 AEs. All-grade AEs reported in ≥10% of the patients included anemia, neutropenia, abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, mucositis, decreased appetite, peripheral neuropathy; with majority of AEs being grade 1/2. Most common grade 3/4 AE was neutropenia; observed in 17.3% (n=9) patients (mDCF: 14%; DCF: 33.3%). Conclusions: NDLS-based regimens demonstrated efficacy &amp; improved safety profile in the treatment of metastatic GAC. Clinical trial information: CTRI/2018/01/011450 . [Table: see text]

Use of a Novel Artificial Intelligence System Leads to the Detection of Significantly Higher Number of Adenomas During Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopy: Results From a Large, Prospective, US Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Adenoma per colonoscopy (APC) has recently been proposed as a quality measure for colonoscopy. We evaluated the impact of a novel artificial intelligence (AI) system, compared with standard high-definition colonoscopy, for APC measurement. This was a US-based, multicenter, prospective randomized trial examining a novel AI detection system (EW10-EC02) that enables a real-time colorectal polyp detection enabled with the colonoscope (CAD-EYE). Eligible average-risk subjects (45 years or older) undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy were randomized to undergo either CAD-EYE-assisted colonoscopy (CAC) or conventional colonoscopy (CC). Modified intention-to-treat analysis was performed for all patients who completed colonoscopy with the primary outcome of APC. Secondary outcomes included positive predictive value (total number of adenomas divided by total polyps removed) and adenoma detection rate. In modified intention-to-treat analysis, of 1,031 subjects (age: 59.1 ± 9.8 years; 49.9% male), 510 underwent CAC vs 523 underwent CC with no significant differences in age, gender, ethnicity, or colonoscopy indication between the 2 groups. CAC led to a significantly higher APC compared with CC: 0.99 ± 1.6 vs 0.85 ± 1.5, P = 0.02, incidence rate ratio 1.17 (1.03-1.33, P = 0.02) with no significant difference in the withdrawal time: 11.28 ± 4.59 minutes vs 10.8 ± 4.81 minutes; P = 0.11 between the 2 groups. Difference in positive predictive value of a polyp being an adenoma among CAC and CC was less than 10% threshold established: 48.6% vs 54%, 95% CI -9.56% to -1.48%. There were no significant differences in adenoma detection rate (46.9% vs 42.8%), advanced adenoma (6.5% vs 6.3%), sessile serrated lesion detection rate (12.9% vs 10.1%), and polyp detection rate (63.9% vs 59.3%) between the 2 groups. There was a higher polyp per colonoscopy with CAC compared with CC: 1.68 ± 2.1 vs 1.33 ± 1.8 (incidence rate ratio 1.27; 1.15-1.4; P < 0.01). Use of a novel AI detection system showed to a significantly higher number of adenomas per colonoscopy compared with conventional high-definition colonoscopy without any increase in colonoscopy withdrawal time, thus supporting the use of AI-assisted colonoscopy to improve colonoscopy quality ( ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04979962).

Real-World Safety and Effectiveness of an 8-Week Regimen of Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir in Patients with HepatitisC and Cirrhosis.

In 2019, an 8-week regimen of glecaprevir/ pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) was FDA-approved for treatment of chronic hepatitisC (HCV) in patients with cirrhosis. We used data from the Chronic HepatitisCohort Study (CHeCS) to evaluate treatment response and adverse events among patients with HCV and cirrhosis under routine clinical care. Using an intention-to-treat (ITT)/modified ITT (mITT) approach, endpoints were (1) sustained virological response (SVR) at 12weeks (SVR12) post-treatment; and (2) adverse events (AEs)/serious AEs during treatment. Patients with cirrhosis from two CHeCS sites were included if they were prescribed GLE/PIB from August 2017 to June 2020. Detailed treatment and clinical data were collected. Patient baseline characteristics were described with mean/standard deviation (std) for continuous variables, and proportions for categorical variables. Analyses were propensity score adjusted. The final model retained variables that were significant with pvalue < 0.05. The ITT sample included 166 patients, with 43, 116, and 7 patients in the 8-week, 12-week, and > 12-week planned treatment groups. Among them, 159had confirmed SVR (95.8%, LCL 93.2%). The mITT analysis included 160 patients after excluding 6 with unknown HCV RNA results; 159 achieved SVR (99.4%, LCL 98.3%). There were no significant differences in rates of SVR between the 8-weekand 12-week regimens in either analysis, nor any association with patient characteristics. SAEs were experienced by 1 patient (2%) in the 8-week group, 7 (5%) in the 12-week group (including one death), and 2 (29%) in the > 12-week group; 4 patients (from the 12-week group) experienced serious AEs or hepatic events that were "likely attributable" to GLE/PIB treatment. An 8-week regimen of GLE/PIB is well tolerated and highly effective among US patients with HCV and cirrhosis receiving routine clinical care.

Initial clinical evidence on biperiden as antiepileptogenic after traumatic brain injury-a randomized clinical trial.

There is currently no efficacious intervention for preventing post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE). Preclinical studies support the potential use of anticholinergics for this condition. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of biperiden as an intervention for preventing PTE. A randomized, double-blinded clinical trial was conducted at HC/FMUSP between 2018-2022. Adults with acute traumatic brain injury (TBI) were randomly assigned to receive biperiden or placebo, for 10 days. The primary outcome was the incidence of PTE while the secondary outcomes included the frequency of seizures, the frequency of any adverse events and mortality after 24 months. The study was powered at a planned enrolment of 132 patients. The trial began in January 2018 and was halted by researchers on March 2020 (and terminated in December 2022) in the face of the global COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, 123 participants were randomized and 112 contributed with data for modified mITT analysis, being that 61 (49.5%) participants completed the 24-month follow-up consult. Data analysis indicated lack of evidence of biperiden for either, the incidence of post-traumatic epilepsy (2.6, 95%CI, 0.65-10.57; p = 0.170) or the mortality rate (1.57, 95%CI, 0.73-3.38; p = 0.248). The frequency of late post-traumatic seizures was higher for biperiden group (2.03, 95%CI = 0.912-3.1597; p <0.001). The present study suggests that there was insufficient evidence regarding the effect of biperiden in preventing PTE after TBI, which underpins the need for larger studies. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT01048138.

Intrarectal injections of botulinum toxin versus placebo for the treatment of urge faecal incontinence in adults (FI-Toxin): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised, controlled phase 3 study

Non-randomised studies assessing intrarectal botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) injections for faecal incontinence are promising. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of BoNTA for the treatment of faecal incontinence in a randomised study. In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we included adult patients who had at least one urgency or faecal incontinence episode per week for at least 3 months and who had experienced a failure of conservative or surgical treatment from eight French specialist hospital units with the skills to manage patients with faecal incontinence. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by a central web form to receive intrarectal submucosal injections of either 200 units of BoNTA (Botox; Allergan, Irvine, CA, USA; BoNTA group) or an equivalent volume of saline (placebo group), stratified by Cleveland Clinic Severity scores (CCS score; ≥12 or <12). Patients, investigators, study site staff, and sponsor personnel were masked to treatment allocation up to the 6-month visit. The primary endpoint was the number of episodes of faecal incontinence and urgency per day assessed using 21-day patient bowel diaries 3 months after the treatment. The primary analysis was performed using a modified intention-to-treat (mITT) approach (ie, in all the randomised patients who had received a treatment) with adjustment for baseline faecal incontinence and urgency episodes. After the final data collection at 6 months after injections, patients were unmasked and offered the BoNTA treatment if they were in the placebo group (rescue therapy) without masking, with an additional 6 months of safety follow-up. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02414425. Between Nov 25, 2015, and Nov 25, 2020, we randomly assigned 200 patients to receive either BoNTA (n=100) or placebo (n=100) injections. Due to withdrawals before the injections, 96 patients were included in the BoNTA group and 95 patients were included in the placebo group (mITT analysis). The mean number of faecal incontinence and urgency episodes per day in the BoNTA group decreased from 1·9 (SD 2·2) at baseline to 0·8 (1·8) at 3 months after the injections, and from 1·4 (1·1) to 1·0 (1·0) in the placebo group, with a baseline-adjusted mean group difference at 3 months estimated at -0·51 (95% CI -0·80 to -0·21, p=0·0008). No serious treatment-related adverse events were reported in the trial. The most frequently reported non-serious adverse event (treatment related or not) following the BoNTA or placebo injections was constipation (reported in 68 [40%] of 169 patients who received the BoNTA injections and 38 [40%] of 95 patients who received placebo injections). BoNTA injections are an efficacious treatment for urge faecal incontinence. Further research will define the optimum selection criteria, dose, site of injection, re-injection frequency, and long-term results. General Direction of Healthcare (French Ministry of Health).

Success of Helicobacter pylori Guideline-based Treatment of Newly Diagnosed and Previously Treated Patients During 2007-2021 in Edmonton, Alberta.

Updated 2016 Helicobacter pylori consensus guidelines recommend treatment for 14 days with concomitant therapy (proton-pump inhibitor (PPI)-amoxicillin-metronidazole-clarithromycin (PAMC) or bismuth-based quadruple therapy (PPI-bismuth-metronidazole-tetracycline, PBMT)) as first line, PBMT or PPI-amoxicillin-levofloxacin (PAL) as second or third line, and PPI-amoxicillin-rifabutin (PAR) as fourth line for 10 days. This was a retrospective cohort study to describe and compare the efficacy of anti-Helicobacter treatment regimens over the periods 2007-2015 and 2016-2021 as well as antibiotic resistance. A modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis was used to analyze the success rate of therapies. mITT includes all patients who were prescribed H. pylori treatment and had at least one follow-up test-of-cure. This included patients who could not complete treatment or were non-adherent with treatment. Risk factors for treatment failures were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Resistance testing was done in a small subset of patients. H. pylori-positive patients who received treatment in Edmonton, Alberta were included in a mITT analysis: 334/387(86%) from 2007 to 2015 and 193/199 (97%) from 2016 to 2021. During 2016-2021, 78% (150/193) of patients underwent cumulative guideline-based treatment with a successful cure in 80% (120/150) of patients. In those who were newly diagnosed, the cure rate was 88% (52/59) versus those with previous treatment failure 75% (68/91) (P < 0.05, risk difference [RD] 14%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-26.3%). The most effective first-line regimens were PAMC for 14 days (87% [45/52]) in 2016-2021 and sequential therapy in 2007-2015 (83% [66/80]) (P = 0.535, RD 4%, 95% CI -8.5-16.5%). When other treatments failed, success with PAR was 50% (2/4) from 2007 to 2015 and 57% (21/37) from 2016 to 2021. Recent (2016-2021) resistance rates to clarithromycin and metronidazole are high at 78% (50/64) and 56% (29/52), respectively. From 2007 to 2015, clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance rates were 80% (36/45) and 83% (38/46), respectively. Levofloxacin resistance increased significantly from 2007-2015 to 2016-2021 (28% [13/46] to 61% [35/57], P < 0.05, RD 33%, 95% CI 11.6-54.4%). Algorithmic treatment with PAMC first line followed by PBMT, PAL, and PAR cures H. pylori in 88% of newly diagnosed patients. PAR therapy shows suboptimal cure rates (50-57% success) but can be considered as third instead of fourth line given increasing levofloxacin resistance rates. Antibiotic resistance in H. pylori is common to clarithromycin, metronidazole, and levofloxacin and frequently accounts for treatment failures.

PROCESS Trial: Effect of Duloxetine Premedication for Postherpetic Neuralgia Within 72 Hours of Herpes Zoster Reactivation-A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is the most common chronic complication of herpes zoster (HZ) and results in severe refractory neuropathic pain. This study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of premedication with duloxetine in the prevention of PHN. The PROCESS trial is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial used a 1:1 duloxetine:control ratio. Adults 50 years or older with HZ who presented with vesicles within 72 hours were recruited. The primary outcome was the incidence of PHN at 12 weeks. PHN was defined as any pain intensity score other than 0 mm on the visual analog scale (VAS) at week 12 after the onset of the rash. The secondary outcomes were the number of participants with VAS >0 and VAS ≥3. The modified intention-to-treat (mITT) principle and per-protocol (PP) principle were used for the primary outcome analysis. A total of 375 participants were randomly assigned to the duloxetine group and 375 were assigned to the control group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of PHN in the duloxetine group compared with the control group in the mITT analysis (86 [22.9%] of 375 vs 108 [28.8%] of 375; P = .067). PP analysis produced similar results. However, there were significant differences between the 2 groups in the number of participants with VAS >0 and VAS ≥3 (P < .05 for all comparisons). Although absolute prevention of PHN does not occur, this trial found that premedication with duloxetine can reduce pain associated with HZ, and therefore can have clinically relevant benefits. Clinical Trials Registration. Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04313335. Registered on 18 March 2020.

Tranexamic Acid to Prevent Bleeding in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies and Severe Thrombocytopenia (TREATT trial). a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial

Conclusions LJE &amp; ZM and EMW &amp; SJS contributed equally Patients undergoing treatment for hematologic malignancies continue to have a high burden of clinically significant bleeding (WHO grade 2 or above) despite receiving prophylactic platelet transfusions (43% in TOPPS trial, NEJM 2013). One potential approach to reduce the burden of bleeding is antifibrinolytic therapy, which has been shown to reduce bleeding and transfusion needs in patients undergoing surgery. The Trial to EvaluAte Tranexamic acid therapy in Thrombocytopenia (TREATT) is a double-blind randomized controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of tranexamic acid (TXA) in patients with hematologic malignancies with severe thrombocytopenia (EudraCT number 2014-001513-35). We enrolled adults with hematologic malignancies having intensive chemotherapy or a hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) who were expected to have severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count ≤10x10 9/L for ≥5 days) at 16 UK and 11 Australian sites. We stratified randomization by site. We randomized participants to receive TXA (1g iv or 1.5g orally) or placebo (saline or capsule/tablet) 8-hourly from when platelet count ≤30x10 9/L or as soon as possible if the platelet count was already ≤ 30x10 9/L (no later than 72 hours after start of chemotherapy or HSCT). We stopped treatment if the unsupported platelet count reached ≥ 30x10 9/L, thrombosis occurred, or patient had received 30 days treatment. Patients received red cell and platelet transfusions according to national transfusion guidelines. Bleeding assessments were performed by trained research staff (inpatients) or via a patient diary, with significant bleeding reported to clinicians (outpatients), using validated tools. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who died or had bleeding of WHO Grade 2 or above from study day 1 ([D1], first day of treatment) to D30. We used marginal Cox proportional hazards regression modelling (adjusted for site to account for clustering) to compare the two arms. Secondary outcomes included: safety outcomes (thrombotic events to D120) and use of blood components. Recruitment was affected by the COVID pandemic. We randomized 616 participants between June 2015 and February 2022 and included 597 in the modified intention to treat (mITT) analysis (platelet count ≤ 30x10 9/L for ≥ 1 day and no exclusion criteria). 16 participants were lost to follow-up prior to D120 (8 each arm); we included them in analyses if possible. Participant mean age was 55.6 years (SD12.2), 38.2% (236/616) were women, 42.9% (264/616) had AML, 35.1% (216/626) autograft and 25.4% (156/626) allograft. There was no evidence of a difference in the risk of death or ≥ Grade 2 bleeding between the TXA and placebo arms (HR 0.92; 95% CI: 0.67, 1.27; p-value 0.62). 29.0% (87/300) of participants in the TXA arm and 32.7% (97/297) in the placebo arm experienced ≥ Grade 2 bleeding, 66.0% (198/300) of participants in the TXA arm and 73.4% (218/297) in the placebo arm experienced ≥ Grade 1 bleeding. There was no evidence of a difference in the risk of death to D30 (HR 2.72; 95% CI 0.29, 25.36; p-value 0.38), however there were only 11 deaths overall. No patient died from bleeding (to D30) or thrombosis (to D120). The proportion of participants surviving to D30 without a platelet transfusion was 8.3% in TXA arm (95% CI: 5.4, 11.9), 6.4% placebo arm (95% CI 3.9, 9.7) (HR 0.92; 95% CI: 0.84, 1.02; p-value 0.10). The proportion of participants surviving to D30 without a red cell transfusion was 29.4% in TXA arm (95% CI: 24.1, 34.8), 20.5% placebo arm (95% CI 16.0, 25.4) (HR 0.82; 95% CI: 0.72, 0.93; p-value 0.003). 13 participants developed thrombosis to D120: 2 arterial events (1 each arm), and 11 venous (7 TXA arm, 4 placebo). 5 participants developed veno-occlusive disease (VOD) to D60 (3 TXA arm, 2 placebo). Additional secondary outcomes (Table 1). Prophylactic TXA had no effect on the incidence of WHO Grade ≥2 bleeding or death when given in addition to prophylactic platelet transfusions to severely thrombocytopenic patients undergoing therapy for hematologic malignancies. The results are consistent with those of a similar trial (A-TREAT, Blood 2022). These results indicate no role for TXA to prevent WHO ≥ Grade 2 bleeding in this patient population. There was no evidence that TXA increases the risk of venous or arterial thrombosis, or VOD, despite use for up to 30 days.

Repetitive LevosimenDan infusions fOR patients with advanced chronic heart failure in the vulnerable post-discharge period: the multinational randomized LeoDOR trial

Abstract Background Studies of the repetitive use of intravenous levosimendan suggested a beneficial effect in patients with advanced heart failure (HF). It was the aim of the LeoDOR trial to test the efficacy and safety of intermittent levosimendan therapy in the vulnerable phase following a hospitalization for acute HF. Methods In this multicenter, double-blind, three-armed trial with an enrolment period from 3-2018 to 6-2021, patients with advanced HF were randomized 2:1 at the end of an index hospitalization for acute HF to intermittent levosimendan therapy or placebo for a period of 12 weeks. Levosimendan was administered according to center preference either as 6-hour infusion at a rate of 0.2 mcg/kg/min every 2 weeks, or as 24-hour infusion at a rate of 0.1 mcg/kg/min every 3 weeks. The primary efficacy assessment after 14 weeks was based on a global rank endpoint consisting of three hierarchical groups: Tier 1 = time to death or urgent heart transplantation or implantation of a ventricular assist device; Tier 2 = time to non-fatal HF requiring i.v. vasoactive therapy; Tier 3 = time-averaged proportional change in NTproBNP from baseline to week 14. Results Due to a forced interim interruption of the study as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the planned number of patients could not be recruited. The final modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis included 145 patients (93 in the combined levosimendan arm, 52 in the placebo arm). Patient characteristics were well balanced between treatment and placebo arms (mean age 69.3±9.7 vs 67.9±10.1, proportion of women 22.6% vs 21.2%, HF-hospitalizations in previous 12 months 1.9±1.4 vs. 1.7±1.1, NTproBNP at baseline 4740 ng/L (IQR 2235 – 9016) vs 5380 ng/L (IQR 2287 – 8204). There were no marked differences regarding HF medication and implanted devices. Compared with placebo, intermittent levosimendan had no significant effect on the primary endpoint (mean rank score 71.8 for the levosimendan group vs 75.1 for the placebo group; p = 0.65). However, there was a strong signal towards a higher incidence of the individual clinical components of the primary endpoint (tier 1 plus tier 2) in the levosimendan group vs the placebo group both after 14 weeks (HR 2.94, 95%CI 1.13–7.70; p = 0.028) and 26 weeks (HR 1.65 95%CI 0.87 – 3.12; p = 0.123). The number of investigator-reported adverse events during and immediately after drug application was 12.4% in the levosimendan group vs 11.8% in the placebo group (p = 0.905). Conclusion Our findings do not support the use of intermittent levosimendan to improve post-hospitalization clinical stability in patients who were recently hospitalized with HF and reduced LVEF. Further studies are warranted to find the correct use of levosimendan in advanced heart failure patients.