Development Of Lymphedema Research Articles

Effect of scapular and shoulder strengthening exercises on prevention of upper limb lymphedema – a pilot study

Background. The most frequent type of cancer among women is breast cancer. According to the report published by Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR, 2019), there are 1.5 lakh new instances of breast cancer nationwide and around 70,000 people in India die from breast cancer each year. Secondary lymphedema (SL) following breast cancer surgery can occur due to the removal of lymph nodes during breast cancer surgery. Objective. This pilot study was done with the objectives to improve the strength of scapular and shoulder muscles, increase the shoulder range of motion, prevent the development of upper limb lymphedema, to reduce shoulder pain and disability and to improve the quality of life among women who underwent breast cancer surgery. Methodology. Ten patients with a mean age of 49.9 ± 8.6 and mean Body mass index (BMI) of 28.4 ± 3.9 were included according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. They were randomized into interventional group (Group A n = 5) and conventional group (Group B n = 5). The interventional group performed the routine exercises prescribed along with the scapular and shoulder muscle strengthening exercises, while the conventional group performed only the routine exercises for 12 weeks. Result. The mean change score values of the outcome variables of both the groups were analyzed using Independent ‘t’ test. Discussion. Arm circumference measurement, shoulder pain, disability and quality of life measures showed significant difference between groups at p < 0.05. Shoulder range of motion, muscle strength and arm volumetry did not show much difference between groups indicating the need for long term continuation of the exercises to produce improvement in those parameters. Conclusion. Long term effect of strengthening exercises will have an effect on improvement of shoulder range of motion, arm volume and muscle strength among the women following breast cancer surgery. Strengthening exercises should be recommended as a part of breast cancer rehabilitation protocol to prevent secondary lymphedema and other postsurgical complications.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy compared with lymphadenectomy in intermediate- and high-risk endometrial carcinoma

BackgroundSentinel lymph node biopsy (SLN) is increasingly used for surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma.ObjectiveTo estimate the effect and cost-effectiveness of the implementation of an SLN algorithm for surgical staging in...

The influence of non-cancer-related risk factors on the development of cancer-related lymphedema: a rapid review.

Extensive research supports an evidence-base for cancer treatment-related risk factors, including extent of lymph node dissection and use of radiotherapy, as contributing to secondary lymphedema. Additionally, comorbidities, such as higher body mass index, and vascular-related conditions are identified to further augment risk. While social determinants of health (SDOH) and socioeconomic factors are widely regarded as influencing an individual's healthcare outcomes, including cancer risk and survival, these factors have not been explored as risk factors for developing secondary lymphedema. A rapid literature review explored the current evidence for SDOH as risk factors for lymphedema. Studies that were published over the last 10years and that specifically analyzed social factors as variables associated with lymphedema were included. Studies that only characterized the social determinants of the study population were not included. Forty-nine studies were identified through a rapid literature review, and 13 studies that expressly analyzed social determinants as risk factors for secondary lymphedema were reviewed and extracted. All studies were conducted in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema. Social risk factors included race, educational level, insurance type, and income level. These are consistent with the socioeconomic inequalities related to cancer survival. SDOH may influence the risk of developing cancer treatment-related health conditions like secondary lymphedema. Research trials studying cancer treatment-related conditions should collect consistent and robust data across social, behavioral, environmental, and economic domains and should analyze these variables to understand their contribution to study endpoints. Risk prediction modeling could be a future pathway to better incorporate social determinants, along with medical and co-morbidity data, to holistically understand lymphedema risk.

Consensus statement on non-cancer-related risk factors for development of secondary lymphedema.

Non-cancer-related risk factors for secondary lymphedema were defined across four categories: co-morbidity, social determinants of health, behavioral factors, and environmental effectors. Based on rapid reviews of the literature and presentations at the ACS/LANA Lymphedema Summit, this working group categorized these risk factors according to the strength of evidence. Consensus agreement on level of evidence was achieved through one face-to-face working session and three follow-up virtual meetings. Findings elucidate strong evidence for co-morbidities, such as cardio/metabolic and vascular factors contributing to the risk for lymphedema. Evidence is low-to-moderate for social and behavioral factors and is lacking for environmental factors. Panel recommendations suggest a tailored approach to prospective surveillance when monitoring for secondary lymphedema that includes social determinants of health considering the growing awareness and evidence of these factors' influence on cancer and cancer-related morbidity.

Advances in Microsurgical Treatment Options to Optimize Autologous Free Flap Breast Reconstruction

Introduction: Reconstructive plastic surgeons have made great strides in the field of breast reconstruction to achieve the best results for patients undergoing treatment for breast cancer. As microsurgical techniques have evolved, these patients can benefit from additional treatment modalities to optimize the results of the reconstruction. Free tissue transfer from alternative donor sites for breast reconstruction is routinely performed, which was not possible in the past. Neurotization is now possible to address the numbness and lack of sensation to the reconstructed breast. For those patients who develop lymphedema of the upper extremity as a result of their breast cancer care, supermicrosurgical options are now available to treat and even to prevent the development of lymphedema. This study presents a narrative review regarding the latest microsurgical advancements in autologous free flap breast reconstruction. Methods: A literature review was performed on PubMed with the key words “autologous free flap breast reconstruction”, “deep inferior epigastric perforator flap”, “transverse upper gracilis flap”, “profunda artery perforator flap”, “superior gluteal artery perforator flap”, “inferior gluteal artery perforator flap”, “lumbar artery perforator flap”, “breast neurotization”, “lymphovenous bypass and anastomosis”, and “vascularized lymph node transfer”. Articles that specifically focused on free flap breast reconstruction, breast neurotization, and lymphedema surgery in the setting of breast cancer were evaluated and included in this literature review. Results: The literature search yielded a total of 4948 articles which were screened. After the initial screening, 413 articles were reviewed to assess the relevance and applicability to the current study. Conclusions: Breast reconstruction has evolved tremendously in recent years to provide the most natural and cosmetically pleasing results for those patients undergoing treatment for breast cancer. As technology and surgical techniques have progressed, breast cancer patients now have many more options, particularly if they are interested in autologous reconstruction. These advancements also provide the possibility of restoring sensibility to the reconstructed breast as well as treating the sequela of lymphedema due to their cancer treatment.

Relation Between Characteristics of Indocyanine Green Lymphography and Development of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.

Background: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a disabling and frequently occurring condition after treatment for breast cancer. Studying lymph anatomy by means of indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography is a promising tool to help better understand BCRL. The aim of this study is to investigate the relation between ICG lymphography characteristics and the risk of developing BCRL. Methods and Results: Patients scheduled for breast surgery with either unilateral axillary lymph node dissection or sentinel lymph node biopsy between November 2017 and May 2019 were included. Patients were assessed at baseline and up to 36 months postsurgery. BCRL was defined as an increase of ≥5% relative arm volume difference compared with the presurgical difference. In total, 128 patients were included. During 36 months of follow-up, 45 patients (35.2%) developed BCRL. The number of lymph vessels before surgery was not a statistically significant risk factor for developing BCRL (p = 0.8485). However, an increase in the number of lymph vessels compared with baseline was a significant protective factor for developing BCRL (odds ratio = 0.8). An increase of one lymph vessel corresponds to a 19% relative risk reduction of developing BCRL. The presence of lymph nodes at baseline and the change in the presence of lymph nodes compared with baseline were no predictors for the development of BCRL (p = 0.0986 and p = 0.8910, respectively). Conclusions: An increase in the number of lymph vessels visualized by ICG lymphography compared with baseline is a protective factor for developing BCRL. Therapies with the ability to increase the number of lymph vessels can thus possibly decrease the risk of developing BCRL.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) may reduce the risk of developing cancer-related lymphedema following axillary lymph node dissection (ALND).

Patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for breast cancer face a high risk of lymphedema, further increased by high body mass index (BMI) and insulin resistance. GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have the potential to reduce these risk factors, but their role in lymphedema has never been investigated. The purpose of this study was to determine if GLP-RAs can reduce the risk of lymphedema in patients undergoing ALND. All patients who underwent ALND at a tertiary cancer center between 2010 and 2023 were reviewed. Patients with less than 2years of follow-up from the time of ALND were excluded. Race, BMI, radiation, chemotherapy history, pre-existing diagnosis of diabetes, lymphedema development after ALND, and the use of GLP-1RAs were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess if there was a significant reduction in the risk of developing lymphedema after ALND. A sub-group analysis of non-diabetic patients was also performed. 3,830 patients who underwent ALND were included, 76 of which were treated with. GLP-1 RAs. The incidence of lymphedema in the GLP-1 RA cohort was 6.6% (5 patients). Compared to 28.5% (1,071 patients) in the non-GLP-1 RA cohort. On multivariate regression analysis, patients who were treated with GLP-1 RA were 86% less likely to develop lymphedema compared to the non-GLP-1 RA cohort (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04-0.32, p < 0.0001). A BMI of 25kg/m 2 or greater was a statistically significant risk factor for developing lymphedema with an odds ratio of 1.34 (95% CI 1.16-1.56, p < 0.0001). Diabetes was associated with lymphedema development that closely approached statistical significance (OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.97-1.78, p = 0.06). A subgroup analysis solely on non-diabetic patients showed similar results. The odds of developing lymphedema were 84% lower for patients without diabetes treated with GLP1-RAs compared to those who did not receive GLP-1 RAs (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.05-0.40, p < 0.0001). GLP1-RAs appear to significantly reduce the risk of lymphedema in patientsundergoing ALND. The mechanism of action may be multifactorial and not limited to weight reduction and insulin resistance. Future prospective analysis is warranted to clarify the role of GLP-1RAs in reducing lymphedema risk.

Development and Validation of Upper Limb Lymphedema in Patients After Breast Cancer Surgery Using a Practicable Machine Learning Model: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Upper limb lymphedema is one of the most common adverse events related to surgery owing to the large gap between guideline implementation and the intended clinical outcomes. However, the monitoring of limb lymphedema remains challenging because of vague clinical presentations. This study aimed to develop and validate practical predictive models for upper limb lymphedema through machine learning. We retrospectively collected clinical data to develop models for early risk prediction of upper limb lymphedema based on a single-center electronic health record data from patients who underwent breast cancer surgery from June 2021 through June 2023. For prediction model building, 70% and 30% of the data were randomly split into training and testing sets, respectively. We then developed an upper limb lymphedema prediction model using machine learning algorithms, which included random forest model (RFM), generalized logistic regression model (GLRM), and artificial neural network model (ANNM). For evaluating the model's performance, we used the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), calibration curve to compare different models. The potential clinical usefulness of the best model at the best threshold was assessed through a net benefit approach using a decision curve analysis (DCA). Of the 3201 patients screened for eligibility, 3160 participants were recruited for the prediction model. Among these, Body Mass Index (BMI), hypertension, TNM, lesion site, level of lymph node dissection(LNMD), treatment, and nurse were independent risk factors for upper limb lymphedema and were listed as candidate variables of ML-based prediction models. The RFM algorithm, in combination with seven candidate variables, demonstrated the highest prediction efficiency in both the training and internal verification sets, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.894 and 0.889 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.839-0.949 and 0.834-0.944, respectively. The other two types of prediction models had prediction efficiencies between AUCs of 0.731 and 0.819 and 95% CIs of 0.674-0.789 and 0.762-0.876, respectively. The interpretable predictive model helps physicians more accurately predict the upper limb lymphedema risk in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. Especially for the RFM, this newly established machine learning-based model has shown good predictive ability for distinguishing high risk of upper limb lymphedema, which could facilitate future clinical decisions, hospital management, and improve outcomes.

Breast cancer-related lymphedema: A comprehensive analysis of risk factors.

Breast cancer-related lymphedema is a devastating condition that negatively affects the quality of life of breast cancer survivors. We sought to identify risk factors that predicted the timing and development of lymphedema. Women with breast cancer that underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) at our institution between 2007 and 2022 were identified and sociodemographic and clinical information was extracted. We used logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors for lymphedema and performed cox-regression analysis to predict the timing of lymphedema presentation after surgery. We identified 1,223 patients, of which 161 (13.2%) developed lymphedema within 1.8 (mean, SD = 2.5) years postoperatively. Patients with SLNB had significantly lower odds for lymphedema development (vs. ALND, OR = 0.29 [0.14-0.57]). Patients between 40 and 49 years of age, and 50-59 (vs. <40 years, OR = 2.14 [1.00-4.60]; OR = 2.42, [1.13-5.16] respectively), African American patients (vs. Caucasian, OR = 1.86 [1.12-3.09]), patients with stage II, III, and IV disease (vs. stage 0, OR = 3.75 [1.36-10.33]; OR = 6.62 [2.14-20.51]; OR = 9.36 [2.94-29.81]), and patients with Medicaid (vs. private insurance, OR = 3.56 [1.73-7.28]) had higher rates of lymphedema. Cox-regression analysis showed that African American (HR = 1.71 [1.08-2.70]), higher BMI (HR = 1.03 [1.00-1.06]), higher stage (stage II, HR = 2.22 [1.05-7.09]; stage III, HR = 5.26 [1.86-14.88]; stage IV, HR = 6.13 [2.12-17.75]), and Medicaid patients (HR = 2.15 [1.12-3.80]) had higher hazards for lymphedema. Patients with SLNB had lower hazards for lymphedema (HR = 0.43 [0.87-2.11]). Lymphedema has identifiable risk factors that can reliably be used to predict the chances of lymphedema development and enable clinicians to educate patients better and formulate treatment plans accordingly. III (Retrospective study).

Donor-site safety in microvascular lymph node transfer for breast cancer-related lymphedema using reverse lymphatic mapping—A prospective study

BackgroundVascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) is one option among other surgical treatments in the management of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). The cause of concern regarding VLNT harvested from the groin has been the potential development of secondary lower-extremity lymphedema. This study explored the risk of donor-site morbidity following groin VLNT, with or without concomitant breast reconstruction. MethodThe cohort comprised data from the Lymfactin® Phase I and II trials during 2016–2019, using perioperative reverse lymphatic mapping. The volume of the lower extremities was measured preoperative and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperative, and adverse events were documented during study visits. ResultsAltogether, 51 women with a mean age of 55.5 years were recruited. The mean duration of BCRL was 31.8 months. Of these, 25 (49%) underwent VLNT (VLNT-group) and 26 (51%) underwent VLNT in combination with breast reconstruction (VLNT-BR group). The groups were similar in terms of age (p=0.766), BMI (p=0.316), and duration of BCRL (p=0.994). Across one year, the volume difference between the lower extremities changed by 22.6ml (ranging from -813 to 860.2ml) (p=0.067). None of the patients had a lower-extremity volume difference exceeding 10% at the 12-month follow-up visit. The most frequent adverse events were postoperative pain (17.7%), wound healing issues (11.8%), and seroma formation (11.8%). Most adverse events (64.6%) were classified as minor. ConclusionsThis prospective study demonstrated that groin VLNT with reverse lymphatic mapping appears safe and does not increase the risk of secondary donor-site lymphedema within one year postoperatively.

The effect of exercise and educational programs for breast cancer patients on the development of breast cancer-related lymphoedema: secondary endpoint from a randomized controlled trial in the Setouchi Breast Project-10.

Although the association between higher physical activity and preventive effect on breast-cancer-related lymphoedema (BCRL) has been reported, it is unclear what intervention is optimal. We aimed to investigate the effect of exercise and educational programs on BCRL development. This study was a secondary endpoint analysis from a prospective randomized controlled trial. We enrolled patients with stage 0-III breast cancer from March 2016 to March 2020 and randomly assigned them to the control (n = 111), education (n = 115), or exercise (n = 104) group. As secondary endpoint, we assessed the incidence of and preventive effect on BCRL at 12months post-intervention. There were no significant differences in the incidence of BCRL at 12months post-intervention between the exercise and control groups (9.8% and 10.8%, P = 0.83) and the education and control groups (11.6% and 10.8%, P = 1.00). There were no significant differences in time to BCRL onset from the day of surgery between the exercise and control groups (event rate at 12months: 20.7% and 17.2%, log-rank, P = 0.54) and the education and control groups (18.8% and 17.2%, log-rank, P = 0.57). The multivariable analyses indicated that axillary dissection and obesity significantly increased the risk of BCRL [hazard ratio (HR): 2.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52-3.67 and HR: 1.68, 95% CI 1.07-2.63, respectively]. The intervention did not decrease the risk of BCRL, and axillary dissection and obesity were the risk factors of BCRL. UMIN000020595 at UMIN Clinical Trial Registry.

Increased Microvascular Filtration and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-D associated with Changed Lymphatic Vessel Morphology in Breast Cancer Treated Patients.

Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) and inflammatory cytokines are indicated to be implicated in lymphedema development. We aimed to describe changes in microvascular filtration and VEGFs in a patient cohort vulnerable to breast cancer-related lymphedema development correlated with data on lymphatic morphology and function. Consecutive node-positive breast cancer patients operated in the axilla and evaluated approximately 12 months after adjuvant locoregional radiotherapy were studied. Capillary filtration rate (CFR) and isovolumetric pressure of the arms were measured by strain gauge plethysmography, and 13 blood proteins were quantified by Luminex and Elisa technology in 28 patients and 18 healthy controls. The CFR was reduced in both arms from baseline to 1-year follow-up (ipsilateral: P = 0.016 and contralateral: P = 0.001). When stratifying lymphatic complications (morphologic abnormalities and/or breast cancer-related lymphedema), CFR reached a lower steady-state in the arms with normal morphology (I:P = 0.013 and C:P = 0.013) whereas the ipsilateral arm with lymphatic complications remained unchanged (P = 0.457). In patients with lymphatic abnormal vessels, the levels of VEGF-D were 86% higher than in patients with normal lymphatic vessels (P = 0.042), whereas levels of VEGFR-3 were 64% higher (P = 0.016). Through one year of follow-up, CFR did not decrease in the lymphatic complicated treated arms as observed in noncomplicated treated arms. The patients had increased levels of VEGF-D and VEGFR-3. This correlation suggests that VEGF plays a role in the appearance of subcutaneous abnormal lymphatic vessels in the treated arms, which also maintain a fluid filtration/drainage mismatch up to one year after breast cancer treatment.

Impact of sentinel node use in lymphedema formation among gynecologic cancer patients.

The most common surgical procedure associated with lymphedema formation is the regional lymphadenectomy. One of the advantages of sentinel node biopsy is the reduction of the risk of lymphedema formation. The purpose of this review is to collect and analyze the most relevant and recent evidence of the use of sentinel node biopsy and its implication on the development of postoperative lymphedema in gynecological cancer. The current evidence of the use of sentinel node biopsy in cervical cancer to reduce lymphedema is heterogeneous and more data is needed to establish its role.Sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial cancer is a staging procedure with lower surgical complications, as well as lymphedema formation; while the results of prospective trials evaluating its impact on quality of life are still lacking.Sentinel lymph node biopsy in vulvar cancer minimizes the need for extensive dissection and reduces the incidence of complications associated with overharvesting of lymph nodes such as lymphedema without compromising oncological outcomes. The prevalence of lymphedema in gynecological cancer varies based on the surgical treatment or additional therapies applied. Over the past years, one of the most important surgical modifications to decrease lymphedema formation has been implementation of sentinel lymph node technique mainly in vulvar cancer patients.

Combination of Supramicrosurgical Lymphatico-Venular Anastomosis (sLVA) and Lymph-Sparing Liposuction in Treating Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Rationale for a Regional One-Stage Approach.

Objective: Cancer-related lymphedema represents a potential complication of cancer treatment. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the combination of lymphatico-venular anastomosis and liposuction in the treatment of secondary lymphedema. Methods: We present a retrospective analysis of patients affected by cancer-related unilateral limb lymphedema. Inclusion criteria included previous neoplastic pathology with the consequent development of unilateral limb lymphedema, while the exclusion criteria included the presence of comorbidities and the persistence of cancer, as well as previous lymphatic surgery. The outcomes to be included were a reduction in the limb volume and lymphangitis rate, and an improvement in the quality of life. Patients' data were assessed before surgery and 1 year after surgery. Perioperative management included clinical and ultrasonographical evaluations. Under local anesthesia, lymphatico-venular anastomosis with the supramicrosurgical technique and the liposuction of the affected limb was performed in the same surgical session. Results: A total of 24 patients were enrolled in the study. One year after the surgery, an average volume reduction of 37.9% was registered (p = 0.0000000596). The lymphangitis rate decreased after surgery from 4.67 to 0.95 per year (p = 0.000007899). The quality-of-life score improved from 68.7 to 16 according to the LLIS scale. Conclusions: The combination of LVA and liposuction represents a valid strategy for treating cancer-related lymphedema, ensuring stable results over time. In addition, it can be performed under local anesthesia, resulting in being minimally invasive and well-tolerated by patients. This paper reports on the short-term efficacy of this combined technique.

Acute response to resistance exercise and later development of arm lymphedema in breast cancer survivors: An exploratory follow-up of a randomized cross-over trial

BackgroundIn breast cancer survivors at risk for lymphedema, variation in lymphatic function and arm volume has been observed related to a bout of exercise, with potential for prediction of breast cancer-related arm lymphedema (BCRaL). This novel, exploratory study examined the acute lymphatic response to resistance exercise and later development of BCRaL in women at high risk for BCRaL. MethodsOne year after participation in a cross-over trial evaluating the acute lymphatic response to upper-extremity resistance exercise (low-and heavy-load), participants were assessed for BCRaL (n ​= ​16). The response to exercise was assessed before and after (post, 24- and 72-hrs) each exercise bout as extracellular fluid (L-Dex; bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS)), interarm volume % difference (IVD; Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)) and symptoms (Numeric rating scale, 0–10 (NRS)). BCRaL at follow-up was defined as presence of one objective indicator (L-Dex >10, change ≥+6.5, IVD >5%) plus one objective or subjective indicator (interarm symptom ≥1 or visual inspection). Descriptive statistics were used to compare the acute response between participants with and without BCRaL at follow-up. ResultsNo trends indicating a similar acute response to exercise was observed in participants who later developed BCRaL (n ​= ​5). There were no observable differences in acute lymphatic response between participants that developed BCRaL and those who did not, both at an individual and group level. ConclusionsFindings from this exploratory study showed no evidence to suggest that the acute response to resistance exercise can predict BCRaL development.

Abstract PS01-01: Feasibility and oncological safety of targeted axillary dissection or sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with clinically node-positive disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the prospective MF-1803 NEOSENTITURK-study

Abstract PS01-01: Feasibility and oncological safety of targeted axillary dissection or sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with clinically node-positive disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the prospective MF-1803 NEOSENTITURK-study

Lymphovenous Bypass for Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Axillary Lymph Node Dissection: Minimizing the Risk of Upper Extremity Lymphedema.

Studies have shown a significant reduction in breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) rates in patients undergoing complete axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) combined with immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) using lymphovenous bypass (LVB).The purpose of this study was to determine if ILR with LVB at the time of cALND results in a decreased incidence of BCRL and its impact on patient quality of life (QOL). In this prospective cohort study, patients ≥ 18 years requiring cALND underwent ILR from 2019 to 2021. The primary outcome was bilateral upper limb volumes measured by Brørson's truncated cone formula and the Pero-System (3D Körper Scanner). The secondary outcome was QOL measured by the Lymphedema Quality of Life (LYMQOL) arm patient-reported outcome measurement. Forty-two patients consented to ILR using LVB. ILR was completed in 41 patients with a mean of 1.9 ± 0.9 lymphovenous anastomosis performed. Mean age of patients was 52.4 ± 10.5 years with a mean body mass index of 27.5 ± 4.9 kg/m2. All patients (n = 39, 100%) received adjuvant therapy after ILR. Mean follow-up was 15.2 ± 5.1 months. Five patients met criteria for lymphedema throughout the duration of the study (12.8%), with two patients having resolution, with an overall incidence of 7.7% by the end of the study period. Patients with lymphedema were found to have statistically significant lower total LYMQOL values at 18 months (8.44 ± 1.17 vs. 3.23 ± 0.56, p < 0.001). A mean increase of 0.73 ± 3.5 points was observed for overall QOL average for upper limb function at 18 months compared with 3 months (t = 0.823, p = 0.425). This study showed an incidence of 7.7% lymphedema development throughout the duration of study. We also showed that ILR has the potential to reduce the significant long-term adverse outcomes of lymphedema and improve QOL for patients undergoing cALND.

Time trend of breast cancer-related lymphedema according to body mass index

PurposeTo clarify how body mass index (BMI) affects the development and temporal trend of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). MethodsThis is a prospective study in which patients with operable breast cancer were registered in a single institute between November 2009 and July 2010. The incidence of lymphedema at 1, 3, and 5 years after surgery was assessed according to BMI, and the trend of newly developed BCRL was examined. Obesity was defined as BMI ≥25 in accordance with the Japan Society for the Study of Obesity. ResultsA total of 368 patients were included in this study. The multivariate analysis of the whole population showed that high BMI, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy remained as risk factors for BCRL. Patients with high BMI showed a significantly higher incidence of new lymphedema than those with low BMI at 1 year (p < 00.001) regardless of axillary procedures (39.1 % vs 16.3 % for axillary dissection; 15.6 % vs 1.5 % for sentinel lymph node biopsy) but not at 3 and 5 years. Once BCRL developed, patients with high BMI showed slow recovery and 50.0 % of the patients retained edema at 5 years while patients with low BMI showed rapid recovery and 26.7 % retained after 3 years (p = 0.04). ConclusionThe preoperative BMI affected the incidence and temporal trend of BCRL regardless of axillary procedures or radiotherapy. Patients with high BMI should be given appropriate information about BCRL before surgery with careful follow-up for BCRL after treatment.

Alternative Lymphatic Drainage Pathways in the Trunk Following Oncologic Therapy.

Anatomic and functional descriptions of trunk and breast lymphedema following breast cancer treatment are emerging as indicators of lymphatic dysfunction. Indocyanine green-lymphangiography has been instrumental in characterizing this dysfunction in the extremity and can be applied to other regions. Previous work has established a validated Pittsburgh Trunk Lymphedema Staging System to characterize such affected areas. This study aims to identify risk and protective factors for the development of truncal and upper extremity lymphedema using alternative lymphatic drainage, providing implications for medical and surgical treatment. Patients undergoing revisional breast surgery with suspicion of upper extremity lymphedema between 12/2014 and 3/2020 were offered lymphangiography. The breast and lateral/anterior trunks were visualized and blindly evaluated for axillary and inguinal lymphatic flow. A linear-weighted Cohen's kappa statistic was calculated comparing alternative drainage evaluation. Binomial regression was used to compute relative risks (RRs). Significance was assessed at alpha = 0.05. Eighty-six sides (46 patients) were included. Twelve sides underwent no treatment and were considered controls. Eighty-eight percent of the noncontrols had alternative lymphatic flow to the ipsilateral axillae (64%), ipsilateral groins (57%), contralateral axillae (20.3%), and contralateral groins (9.3%). Cohen's kappa for alternative drainage was 0.631 ± 0.043. Ipsilateral axillary and contralateral inguinal drainage were associated with reduced risk of developing truncal lymphedema [RR 0.78, confidence interval (CI) 0.63-0.97, P = 0.04; RR 0.32, CI 0.13-0.79, P = 0.01, respectively]. Radiation therapy increased risk of truncal and upper extremity lymphedema (RR 3.69, CI 0.96-14.15, P = 0.02; RR 1.92, CI 1.09-3.39, P = 0.03, respectively). Contralateral axillary drainage and axillary lymph node dissection were associated with increased risk of upper extremity lymphedema (RR 4.25, CI 1.09-16.61, P = 0.01; RR 2.83, CI 1.23-6.52, P = 0.01, respectively). Building upon previous work, this study shows risk and protective factors for the development of truncal and upper extremity lymphedema. Most prevalent alternative channels drain to the ipsilateral axilla and groin. Ipsilateral axillary and contralateral inguinal drainage were associated with reduced risk of truncal lymphedema. Patients with radiation, axillary dissection, and contralateral axillary drainage were associated with increased risk of upper extremity lymphedema. These findings have important clinical implications for postoperative manual lymphatic drainage and for determining eligibility for lymphovenous bypass surgery.

The Role of Inflammation in Lymphedema: A Narrative Review of Pathogenesis and Opportunities for Therapeutic Intervention.

Lymphedema is a chronic and progressive disease of the lymphatic system characterized by inflammation, increased adipose deposition, and tissue fibrosis. Despite early hypotheses identifying lymphedema as a disease of mechanical lymphatic disruption alone, the progressive inflammatory nature underlying this condition is now well-established. In this review, we provide an overview of the various inflammatory mechanisms that characterize lymphedema development and progression. These mechanisms contribute to the acute and chronic phases of lymphedema, which manifest clinically as inflammation, fibrosis, and adiposity. Furthermore, we highlight the interplay between current therapeutic modalities and the underlying inflammatory microenvironment, as well as opportunities for future therapeutic development.