Node Recurrence-free Survival Research Articles

Nomogram to Predict Nodal Recurrence-Free Survival in Early Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

This study aimed to develop and internally validate a prognostic nomogram for predicting nodal recurrence-free survival (NRFS) in patients with early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) with clinically negative neck lymph nodes. The management of early-stage oral cancer patients with clinically negative neck lymph nodes (cN0) remains controversial, especially concerning the need for elective neck dissection. Data from a single institution spanning 2010 to 2020 were utilized to develop and evaluate the nomogram. The nomogram was constructed using multivariable Cox regression and LASSO regression analyses to identify independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis. Internal validation was performed using bootstrap resampling to assess the nomogram's predictive accuracy. A total of 930 cN0 patients with T1 and T2 stage OSCC were randomly divided into training and validation cohorts (8:2 ratio). Independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis included tumor pathological grade (well: reference, moderate/poor: OR 1.69), cT (cT1: reference, cT2: OR 2.01), history of drinking (never: reference, current/former: OR 1.72), and depth of invasion (0 mm < DOI ≤ 5 mm: reference, 5 mm < DOI ≤ 10 mm: OR 1.31). The nomogram, incorporating these variables, demonstrated good predictive accuracy with a C-index of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.58-0.76) in the validation set. In both training and validation groups, the nomogram effectively stratified patients into low-risk and high-risk groups for occult cervical nodal metastases (p < 0.05). The nomogram enables risk stratification and improved identification of occult cervical nodal metastases in clinically node-negative OSCC patients by incorporating tumor-specific and patient-specific risk factors.

Whole pelvis vs. hemi pelvis elective nodal radiotherapy in patients with PSMA-positive nodal recurrence after radical prostatectomy - a retrospective multi-institutional propensity score analysis

PurposeDespite growing evidence for bilateral pelvic radiotherapy (whole pelvis RT, WPRT) there is almost no data on unilateral RT (hemi pelvis RT, HPRT) in patients with nodal recurrent prostate cancer after prostatectomy. Nevertheless, in clinical practice HPRT is sometimes used with the intention to reduce side effects compared to WPRT. Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography / computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT) is currently the best imaging modality in this clinical situation. This analysis compares PSMA-PET/CT based WPRT and HPRT.MethodsA propensity score matching was performed in a multi-institutional retrospective dataset of 273 patients treated with pelvic RT due to nodal recurrence (214 WPRT, 59 HPRT). In total, 102 patients (51 in each group) were included in the final analysis. Biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) defined as prostate specific antigen (PSA) < post-RT nadir + 0.2ng/ml, metastasis-free survival (MFS) and nodal recurrence-free survival (NRFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log rank test.ResultsMedian follow-up was 29 months. After propensity matching, both groups were mostly well balanced. However, in the WPRT group there were still significantly more patients with additional local recurrences and biochemical persistence after prostatectomy. There were no significant differences between both groups in BRFS (p = .97), MFS (p = .43) and NRFS (p = .43). After two years, BRFS, MFS and NRFS were 61%, 86% and 88% in the WPRT group and 57%, 90% and 82% in the HPRT group, respectively. Application of a boost to lymph node metastases, a higher RT dose to the lymphatic pathways (> 50 Gy EQD2α/β=1.5 Gy) and concomitant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) were significantly associated with longer BRFS in uni- and multivariate analysis.ConclusionsOverall, this analysis presents the outcome of HPRT in nodal recurrent prostate cancer patients and shows that it can result in a similar oncologic outcome compared to WPRT. Nevertheless, patients in the WPRT may have been at a higher risk for progression due to some persistent imbalances between the groups. Therefore, further research should prospectively evaluate which subgroups of patients are suitable for HPRT and if HPRT leads to a clinically significant reduction in toxicity.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy versus observation in high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in immunosuppressed and immunocompetent patients: An inverse probability of treatment weighting study.

The survival benefit of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in immunocompetent and immunosuppressed patients with high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) has not been established. To determine whether SLNB improves disease-specific survival (DSS) in high-risk cSCC. Secondary objectives were to analyse disease-free survival, nodal recurrence-free survival and overall survival (OS). Multicentre, retrospective, observational cohort study comparing survival outcomes in immunosuppressed and immunocompetent patients treated with SLNB or watchful waiting. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for possible confounding effects. We studied 638 tumours in immunocompetent patients (SLNB n = 42, observation n = 596) and 173 tumours in immunosuppressed patients (SLNB n = 28, observation n = 145). Overall, SLNB was positive in 15.7% of tumours. SLNB was associated with a reduced risk of nodal recurrence (NR)(hazard ratio [HR], 0.05 [95% CI, 0.01-0.43]; p = 0.006), disease specific mortality (HR, 0.17 [95% CI, 0.04-0.72]; p = 0.016) and all-cause mortality (HR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.15-0.71]; p = 0.004) only in immunocompetent patients. SLNB was associated with improvements in NR, DSS and OS in immunocompetent but not in immunosuppressed patients with high-risk cSCC.

Primary tumor site for localized Merkel cell carcinoma drives different management strategies without impacting oncologic outcomes

Background and purposeClinically localized Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) has been associated with high rates of disease relapse. This study examines how primary tumor anatomic site drives patterns of care and outcomes in a large cohort treated in the contemporary era. Materials and methodsPatterns of care and associated outcomes were evaluated for clinically Stage I-II MCC patients treated at our institution with adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) to the primary site and/or regional nodal basin as a component of their curative intent therapy between 2014–2021. ResultsOf 80 patients who met inclusion criteria, the primary tumor anatomic site was head and neck (HN) for 42 (53%) and non-head and neck (NHN) for 38 (47%). Primary tumor risk factors were similar between cohorts. Fewer patients with HN tumors had wide local excision (WLE; HN-81% vs. NHN-100% p < 0.01). Of those undergoing WLE, patients with HN tumors received higher dose adjuvant RT (>50 Gy: HN-70% vs. NHN-8%; p < 0.01). Patients with HN tumors were less likely to undergo sentinel lymph node biopsy (HN-62%vs. NHN-100%; p < 0.01) and more likely to have elective nodal RT (HN-48% vs. NHN-0%). Despite varying management strategies, there was no significant difference in local recurrence-free survival (3-yr LRFS HN-94% vs. NHN-94%; p = 0.97), nodal recurrence-free survival (3-yr NRFS HN-89% vs. NHN-85%; p = 0.71) or overall recurrence-free survival (3-yr RFS 73% HN vs. 80% NHN; p = 0.44). ConclusionsAmong patients with primary MCC who had RT as a component of their initial treatment strategy, anatomically-driven heterogeneous treatment approaches were associated with equally excellent locoregional disease control.

Adjuvant Therapy for Elderly Breast Cancer Patients after Breast-Conserving Surgery: Outcomes in Real World Practice.

We aimed to evaluate the standard of care of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in elderly female patients (≥65 years) treated outside of clinical trials and to identify potential factors related to the omission of RT and the interaction with endocrine therapy (ET). All women treated with BCS at two major breast centers between 1998 and 2014 were evaluated. Data were provided by the Tumor Registry Munich. Survival analyses were conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were identified using multivariate Cox regression analysis. The median follow-up was 88.4 months. Adjuvant RT was performed in 82% (2599/3171) of patients. Irradiated patients were younger (70.9 vs. 76.5 years, p < 0.001) and were more likely to receive additional chemotherapy (p < 0.001) and ET (p = 0.014). Non-irradiated patients more often had non-invasive DCIS tumors (pTis: 20.3% vs. 6.8%, p < 0.001) and did not undergo axillary surgery (no axillary surgery: 50.5% vs. 9.5%, p < 0.001). Adjuvant RT was associated with improved locoregional tumor control after BCS in invasive tumors (10-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS): 94.0% vs. 75.1%, p < 0.001, 10-year lymph node recurrence-free survival (LNRFS): 98.1% vs. 93.1%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed significant benefits for local control with postoperative RT. Furthermore, RT led to increased locoregional control even in patients who received ET (10-year LRFS 94.8% with ET + RT vs. 78.1% with ET alone, p < 0.001 and 10-year LNRFS: 98.2% vs. 95.0%, p = 0.003). Similarly, RT alone had significantly better locoregional control rates compared to ET alone (10-year LRFS 92.6% with RT alone vs. 78.1% with ET alone, p < 0.001 and 10-year LNRFS: 98.0% vs. 95.0%, p = 0.014). The present work confirms the efficacy of postoperative RT for breast carcinoma in elderly patients (≥65 years) treated in a modern clinical setting outside of clinical trials, even in patients who receive ET.

Efficacy and safety of a treatment in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANC) involving carotid artery invasion.

Locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANC) often invades the parapharyngeal space and internal carotid artery. Are patients with LANC invading carotid artery are at risk of massive neck hemorrhage after radiotherapy? This retrospective study included 130 LANC patients with carotid artery invasion admitted to our hospital between January 2012 and September 2019. All patients were treated with induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) ± epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor. Univariate and multivariate analysis of risk factors were conducted for the prognosis and the occurrence of massive neck hemorrhage of LANC patients with carotid artery invasion. The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), local nodal recurrence-free survival (LNRFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), nodal recurrence-free survival (NRFS) and overall survival (OS) of the 130 patients were 75.2%, 76.8%, 90.0%, 93.9%, 95.8% and 87.2%, respectively. The incidence of fatal bleeding after radiotherapy was 2.3% (3/130). The primary site of the three cases were all the pharyngeal recess, with more than 270° carotid artery invasion, suffering nasopharyngeal necrosis after radiotherapy (2 of which were diabetics and 1 received re-radiation after recurrence). Univariate analysis showed that clinical stage was negatively correlated with DMFS and PFS (P < 0.05). The induction chemotherapy TP regimen, platinum-based concurrent chemotherapy and EGFR inhibitors (Nituzumab/Cetuximab) significantly improved PFS and DMFS (P < 0.05). Patients with hemoglobin levels > 110g/L had significantly inferior PFS, DMFS and OS than those with hemoglobin levels ≤ 110g/L (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that the EGFR inhibitor was an independent risk factor for PFS and DMFS, while the lowest hemoglobin level was an independent risk factor for OS. In LANC patients whose carotid artery invasion was < 270°, induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by helical tomotherapy (HT) and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) inhibitor had mild and tolerable side effects, better PFS and DMFS, with no massive hemorrhage. In patients whose primary tumor was pharyngeal recess with carotid artery invasion ≥ 270°, poorly controlled diabetes or re-radiotherapy led to a higher risk of massive hemorrhage after radiotherapy.

Is prophylactic neck irradiation indicated for patients with cN0 adenoid cystic carcinoma of the paranasal sinuses?

PurposeTo study the prevalence of nodal metastases in sinonasal adenoid cystic carcinoma (SNACC) and to evaluate whether prophylactic neck irradiation (PNI) should be performed in patients with clinical N0 (cN0) disease. Patients and methodsBetween April 1992 and November 2020, 166 patients with SNACC who had undergone radiotherapy at our department were retrospectively analyzed. The median follow-up time was 71.3 months. ResultsAmong 166 cases of SNACC, a total of 13 (7.8%) had retropharyngeal or cervical nodal metastasis and 93% (12/13) cases occurred in patients with advanced T stage (T3-T4). Levels VIIa, Ib, and IIa were the most common sites of initial nodal involvement. Only 1.2% (2/166) of patients presented late neck recurrence.Lymph node metastasis independently predicted a poor progression-free survival (PFS) (P = 0.017) but had no impact on overall survival (OS) (P = 0.38).PNI was performed on 36% (55/153) of cN0 patients. The OS (P = 0.42), PFS (P = 0.59), nodal recurrence-free survival (NRFS) (P = 0.46) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (P = 0.63) rates showed no significant difference between cases with and without PNI. Furthermore, cN0 patients with T4b (P = 0.53; P = 0.61), tumor origin from maxillary sinus (P = 0.55; P = 0.53) or nasopharynx involvement (P = 0.56; P = 0.60) showed no extended OS or PFS associated with PNI. ConclusionsRegardless of the T stage or the site of origin, prophylactic neck irradiation (PNI) for cN0 patients did not provide any benefit on OS and PFS, suggesting that its application on such patients is not warranted unless there is clinical suspicion.

Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer in overweight patients.

Gastrectomy for gastric cancer in overweight patients is associated with a high incidence of postoperative complications and difficulties in achieving adequate lymph node dissection. We conducted this study to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic and open distal gastrectomy (ODG) for gastric cancer in overweight Japanese patients. This retrospective study analyzed data from 180 patients with a body mass index ≥ 25 who underwent distal gastrectomy for pStage I-III gastric cancer. Postoperative complications, the number of harvested lymph nodes, and long-term survival were compared between ODG and laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG). Postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade ≥ 2 and ≥ 3 were significantly higher after ODG than after LDG (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004). Multivariate analysis identified age and ODG as factors related to complications of CD ≥ 2 (p = 0.014 and 0.002). The number of harvested lymph nodes at region 4sb was significantly higher in LDG for patients with pStage III disease. The 5-year lymph node recurrence-free survival tended to be better in LDG; however, no difference was found between ODG and LDG at any pathological stage. There were no significant differences in the 5-year overall and recurrence-free survival rates after ODG vs. LDG. LDG for gastric cancer appears to be associated with a lower incidence of postoperative complications than ODG, without compromising long-term survival, even for overweight patients.

Integrating the 31-gene expression profile and clinicopathologic data to determine the risk of sentinel lymph node positivity and recurrence-free survival in cutaneous melanoma

N/A

Does the pattern of lymphatic drainage influence the risk of nodal recurrence in trunk melanoma patients with negative sentinel lymph node biopsy?

BackgroundThere are conflicting data regarding the prognostic value of the lymphatic basin drainage pattern in melanoma patients and the evidence is scant in the setting of negative sentinel lymph node biopsy. ObjectiveTo investigate whether the pattern of lymphatic basin drainage influences the risk of nodal disease in patients with melanoma of the trunk and negative sentinel lymph node biopsy. MethodsA case series of patients with trunk melanoma and negative sentinel lymph node biopsy was retrospectively evaluated. Clinicopathological features, the pattern of lymphatic drainage and nodal, metastatic, and overall recurrence-free survival were reviewed. ResultsOf the 135 patients included, multiple lymphatic basin drainage was identified in 61 (45.2%). Ten of the 74 (13.5%) patients with single drainage developed nodal recurrence, compared with 2 of the 61 (3.6%) patients with multiple drainages (p = 0.04). Nodal recurrence-free survival was significantly longer in the group with multiple drainages than in the group with single drainage (175.6 vs. 138.7 months; p = 0.04). In multivariate analysis, single drainage was associated with a higher risk of nodal recurrence (HR = 4.54; p = 0.05). No significant differences in metastatic and overall recurrence-free survival were found between groups. Study limitationsRetrospective analysis, single-center study, small sample, detailed histopathologic information not always present. ConclusionsIn patients with trunk melanoma and negative sentinel lymph node biopsy, multiple lymphatic basin drainage may be an independent risk factor for nodal disease recurrence. This factor may help to identify patients with negative sentinel lymph node biopsy with a higher risk of nodal recurrence.

The Role of Regional Disease and Patterns of Treatment Failure in Primary Sinonasal Malignancies.

BackgroundThe question how to treat the clinically negative neck in sinonasal malignancies is controversial.ObjectivesTo investigate patterns of treatment failure and to assess outcome measures in patients with primary sinonasal malignancies.MethodsRetrospective cohort study of patients treated for primary malignant sinonasal malignancies.ResultsLymph node (LN) metastases at initial presentation were present in 8 of 152 patients (5.3%). Ipsi- and contralateral LN levels 1 and 2 were identified as nodal basins at risk. We found a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 75.2% and disease free survival of 61.1%. Among patients with cN0 neck, nodal recurrence free survival was not different between patients with and without elective neck treatment (P = .23). On logistic regression analysis, we found initial T classification as an independent factor for achievement of complete remission (CR) and OS.ConclusionsLN metastases at initial presentation are rare and initial T classification was identified as the most important prognostic factor for OS and CR, emphasizing the need for a thorough initial staging of the primary tumor.

Predictors of False Negative Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Clinically Localized Merkel Cell Carcinoma.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is routinely recommended for clinically localized Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC); however, predictors of false negative (FN) SLNB are undefined. Patients from six centers undergoing wide excision and SLNB for stage I/II MCC (2005-2020) were identified and were classified as having either a true positive (TP), true negative (TN) or FN SLNB. Predictors of FN SLNB were identified and survival outcomes were estimated. Of 525 patients, 28 (5.4%), 329 (62.7%), and 168 (32%) were classified as FN, TN, and TP, respectively, giving an FN rate of 14.3% and negative predictive value of 92.2% for SLNB. Median follow-up for SLNB-negative patients was 27 months, and median time to nodal recurrence for FN patients was 7 months. Male sex (hazard ratio [HR] 3.15, p=0.034) and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (HR 2.22, p=0.048) significantly correlated with FN, and increasing age trended toward significance (HR 1.04, p=0.067). The 3-year regional nodal recurrence-free survival for males >75 years with LVI was 78.5% versus 97.4% for females ≤75 years without LVI (p=0.009). Five-year disease-specific survival (90.9% TN vs. 51.3% FN, p<0.001) and overall survival (69.9% TN vs. 48.1% FN, p=0.035) were significantly worse for FN patients. Failure to detect regional nodal microscopic disease by SLNB is associated with worse survival in clinically localized MCC. Males, patients >75 years, and those with LVI may be at increased risk for FN SLNB. Consideration of increased nodal surveillance following negative SLNB in these high-risk patients may aid in early identification of regional nodal recurrences.

Postoperative Radiotherapy Omitting Level Ⅳ for Locally Advanced Supraglottic and Glottic Laryngeal Carcinoma.

Background:Cervical lymph nodes metastases are one of the most significant prognostic factors in patients with laryngeal carcinoma, whether treatment by surgery or by radiotherapy. The current study retrospected the postoperative radiotherapy of locally advanced supraglottic and glottic laryngeal carcinoma (at a greater risk of lymph node metastasis) to determine the effect of radiotherapy excluding cervical level Ⅳ lymph nodes.Methods:Patients of supraglottic type and glottic type were irradiated with level Ⅳ from January 2012 to June 2013, without level Ⅳ from July 2013 to December 2014, according to physicians’ decision. Ninety-three patients were selective neck irradiation (SNI) of levels Ⅱ-Ⅳ (Group A) and 87 patients were SNI of levels Ⅱ and Ⅲ (Group B). The comparison between Group A and Group B was made with observation of clinical risk of recurrence and radiation complications, as well as overall survival (OS), progress-free survival (PFS) and regional nodal recurrence-free survival.Results:No remarkable difference was observed in the distribution of recurrence, levels of relapse, OS, PFS and regional nodal recurrence-free survival between the 2 groups (p > 0.05). Mean radiation dose at level Ⅳ, thyroid and cervical esophagus showed significant difference between the 2 therapeutic groups (p < 0.01). As regard radiation complications, no significant difference was found in radiation dermatitis of any grade between the 2 groups (p > 0.05). However, there was remarkable difference in clinical hypothyroidism and radiation esophagitis between Group A and Group B (p < 0.05).Conclusions:Radiotherapy after surgery omitting level Ⅳ may improve the quality of life in patients with locally advanced supraglottic and glottic laryngeal carcinoma, won’t worsen the prognosis as well.

Failure patterns and prognostic factors for cervical node-negative nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era.

To evaluate the failure patterns and prognostic factors in patients with cervical node-negative nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) era. Patients with cervical node-negative NPC treated with IMRT at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between February 2001 and December 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. The failure patterns, prognostic factors, and efficacy of additional chemotherapy were assessed. The median follow-up time was 78 months for 298 patients. The 5-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), nodal recurrence-free survival (NRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), failure-free survival (FFS), and overall survival (OS) were 95.2%, 99.3%, 94.8%, 89.8%, and 92.9%, respectively. The rate of treatment failure remained high in patients with T4 disease (35.4%, 17/48), including eight of local recurrence, two of nodal recurrence, and seven of distant metastasis. Multivariate analyses showed that the primary gross tumor volume (GTVp) was significantly associated with LRFS, DMFS, FFS, and OS. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with GTVp ≤ 42.5 cc had better 5-year LRFS (98.7%vs 81.4%, P<.001), 5-year DMFS (97.8%vs 82.5%, P<.001), 5-year FFS (96.1%vs 65.4%, P<.001), and 5-year OS (96.6%vs 78.2%, P<.001) than patients with GTVp>42.5 cc. However, additional chemotherapy showed no significant survival benefit in stratification analysis. Cervical node-negative NPC has a good prognosis in the IMRT era, and the primary tumor volume is the most important prognostic factor. Further exploration is needed to determine the optimal treatment strategy for patients with a high tumor burden.

Association of Genetic Variants in ANGPT/TEK and VEGF/VEGFR with Progression and Survival in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Radiotherapy or Radiochemotherapy.

Angiogenesis is essential for growth, progression, and metastasis of solid tumors. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/VEGF receptor (VEGFR) and angiopoietin (ANGPT)/ tyrosine kinase endothelial (TEK) signaling plays an important role in regulating angiogenesis. Very little is known about the effects of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in angiogenesis-related genes on treatment outcome in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Therefore, we evaluated the association between SNPs in ANGPT1, ANGPT2, TEK, VEGF, VEGFR1, and VEGFR2 genes and five clinical endpoints in 422 HNSCC patients receiving radiotherapy alone or combined with chemotherapy. Multivariate analysis showed an association of ANGPT2 rs3739391, rs3020221 and TEK rs639225 with overall survival, and VEGF rs2010963 with overall and metastasis-free survival. VEGFR2 rs1870377 and VEGF rs699947 affected local recurrence-free survival in all patients. In the combination treatment subgroup, rs699947 predicted local, nodal, and loco-regional recurrence-free survival, whereas VEGFR2 rs2071559 showed an association with nodal recurrence-free survival. However, these associations were not statistically significant after multiple testing correction. Moreover, a strong cumulative effect of SNPs was observed that survived this adjustment. These SNPs and their combinations were independent risk factors for specific endpoints. Our data suggest that certain germline variants in ANGPT2/TEK and VEGF/VEGFR2 axes may have predictive and prognostic potential in HNSCC treated with radiation or chemoradiation.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for T1b Melanoma: Balancing Prognostic Value and Cost.

The purpose of this study is to report the additional prognostic information and cost associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for patients with T1b melanoma. An institutional database was queried for patients with T1b melanoma (0.8-1.0mm or < 0.8mm with ulceration) with at least 5years of follow-up. Results of SLNB, completion lymphadenectomy (CLND), recurrence, and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) were assessed. Institutional costs of melanoma care were converted to Medicare proportional dollars. A Markov model was created to estimate long-term costs. Among the total 392 patients, 238 underwent SLNB. Median follow-up was 10.5years. SLNB was positive in 19 patients (8.0%). Patients who underwent SLNB had higher 10-year nodal recurrence-free survival (98.6% vs. 91.2%, p < 0.001) but not MSS (94.4% vs. 93.2%, p = 0.55). Ulceration (HR 4.7, p = 0.022) and positive sentinel node (HR 11.5, p < 0.001) were associated with worse MSS. Estimates for 5-year costs reflect a fourfold increase in total costs of care associated with SLNB. However, a treatment plan that forgoes adjuvant therapy for resected stage IIIA melanoma but offers systemic therapy for a node-basin recurrence would nullify the additional cost of SLNB. SLNB is prognostic for T1b melanoma. Its impact on the overall cost of melanoma care is intimately tied to systemic therapy in the adjuvant and recurrent settings.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with weekly docetaxel versus cisplatin in the treatment of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis

BackgroundPromising efficacy and manageable toxicity of docetaxel-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) were reported in head and neck cancer. In addition, the effect of CCRT in combination with cisplatin and/or 5-fluorouracil on both locoregionally advanced and metastatic/recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) was verified. However, CCRT with docetaxel for locoregionally advanced NPC are not well studied. This study aimed to compare effectiveness and toxicities of CCRT with weekly docetaxel versus tri-weekly cisplatin for locoregionally advanced NPC.MethodsClinical data of patients with locoregionally advanced NPC newly diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2014 receiving CCRT with either weekly docetaxel (15 mg/m2) or tri-weekly cisplatin (80–100 mg/m2) were reviewed. Propensity score matching at a 1:1 ratio was performed to balance baseline characteristics. Adverse events and survival were compared between the two groups.ResultsA total of 962 patients were included as the whole cohort, and 448 patients were matched and were regarded as the matched cohort. The median follow-up duration was 48 months for the whole cohort. The 3-year nodal recurrence-free survival rate was significantly increased for patients treated with docetaxel in both the whole (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19–0.72, P = 0.030) and matched cohorts (HR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.14–0.79, P = 0.023). However, no significant differences were observed in overall survival, local recurrence-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival between the two groups in both cohorts. Significantly higher rates of grade 3 radiodermatitis (6.7% vs. 1.8%, P = 0.001), mucositis (74.5% vs. 37.9%, P < 0.001), and leucopenia (2.2% vs. 11.6%, P < 0.001) were observed in the docetaxel group, but any grade of renal injury (1.8% vs. 15.1%, P < 0.001), vomiting (18.8% vs. 88.3%, P < 0.001), and ALT elevation (19.2% vs. 31.3%, P = 0.027) were more common in the cisplatin group.ConclusionsCCRT with weekly low-dose docetaxel is an effective and tolerable therapeutic regimen for locally advanced NPC. It provides a survival benefit mainly by improving the control of regional lymph node metastases, especially for patients with low pretreatment EBV DNA levels.

Determine the Optimal Extent of Thyroidectomy and Lymphadenectomy for Patients With Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma.

Background: The optimal extent of surgery, including lymph node dissection, remains controversial in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC). Determining risk factors of central lymph node metastasis (CLNM) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) may help surgeons determine individualized surgery.Methods: A total of 353 patients with PTMC were retrospectively analyzed, including 263 with overt PTMC and 90 with incidental PTMC. The recurrence rates between different extents of thyroidectomy were compared. The relationship between CLNM and clinicopathologic factors was analyzed. The Cox regression model was used to determine the risk factors for RFS.Results: Lobectomy/total thyroidectomy (TT) with central neck dissection (CND) was performed in 263 overt PTMC patients, and lobectomy/partial thyroidectomy was performed in 90 incidental PTMC patients. In 263 overt PTMC patients, 93 (26.3%) had CLNM only and 13 (3.7%) had both CLNM and lateral lymph node metastases (LLNM). Multifocal PTMC patients who underwent lobectomy had a higher rate of thyroid bed and lymph node recurrence than patients who underwent TT (P < 0.05). Independent predictors for CLNM were age <45 years, tumor size >5 mm and presence of extrathyroidal extension (ETE). Tumor size >5 mm, multifocality, presence of ETE, presence of CLNM, and presence of LLNM were the significant factors related to the RFS.Conclusion: Fine-needle aspiration biopsy is advised to distinguish incidental PTMC from the benign nodules. For multifocal PTMC patients, TT should be performed to reduce recurrence. Routine prophylactic CND can be recommended in PTMC patients with independent risk factors of CLNM. Aggressive surgery and close follow-up are essential for patients with risk factors of RFS.

Completion Lymph Node Dissection or Radiation Therapy for Sentinel Node Metastasis in Merkel Cell Carcinoma.

For sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis from Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), the benefit of completion lymph node dissection (CLND) versus radiation therapy (RT) is unclear. This study compares outcomes for patients with SLN metastasis undergoing CLND or RT. We also evaluated positive non-SLNs as a prognostic factor. Using a prospective database, we identified MCC patients with SLN metastasis who underwent CLND or RT. At our institution, CLND was recommended for patients with acceptable perioperative risk, while therapeutic RT was offered to those with high perioperative risk. Primary outcomes were MCC-specific survival (MCCSS), disease-free survival (DFS), nodal recurrence-free survival (NRFS), and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS). From 2006 to 2017, 163 patients underwent CLND (n = 137) or RT (n = 26). Median follow-up was 1.9years. CLND had no significant differences for MCCSS (5-year survival 71% vs. 64%, p = 1.0), DFS (52% vs. 61%, p = 0.8), NRFS (76% vs. 91%, p = 0.3), or DRFS (65% vs. 75%, p = 0.3) compared with RT. Patients with positive non-SLNs (n = 44) had significantly worse MCCSS (5-year survival 39% vs. 87%, p < 0.001), DFS (35% vs. 60%, p = 0.005), and DRFS (54% vs. 71%, p = 0.03) compared with negative non-SLNs (n = 93). Multivariate analysis showed positive non-SLNs were independently associated with MCCSS, DFS, and DRFS. CLND and RT may have similar outcomes for MCC patients with SLN metastasis when treatment aligns with our institutional practices. For patients undergoing CLND, positive non-SLNs is an important prognostic factor associated with poor survival and distant recurrence. This high-risk group should be considered for adjuvant systemic therapy trials.

The Role of the Neo-Bioscore Staging System in Guiding the Optimal Strategies for Regional Nodal Irradiation Following Neoadjuvant Treatment in Breast Cancer Patients with cN1 and ypN0-1.

The role of regional nodal irradiation (RNI) in patients with cN1 breast cancer following neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) is still controversial. The Neo-Bioscore staging system has shown promising prospect in assessing individual prognosis after NAT, and we sought to evaluate the role of Neo-Bioscore in guiding RNI following NAT. Medical records of 163 women with cN1 and ypN0-1 disease treated with NAT between 2009 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed and a Neo-Bioscore was assigned to each patient. Survivals were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was used to identify independent predictors by using Cox proportional hazards models. The median follow-up after surgery was 59.4months. Of all 163 patients, 119 received RNI. At surgery, 36 patients (22.1%) had pathological complete response (pCR), while 89 patients (54.6%) achieved ypN0. In the whole cohort, RNI significantly improved distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) on multivariable analysis. In the subgroup of patients with a Neo-Bioscore of 1-3, RNI significantly improved the 5-year DMFS rate of 97.0% versus 76.9% (p = 0.002), 5-year regional node recurrence-free survival rate of 95.5% versus 76.9% (p = 0.007), and 5-year overall survival rate of 100% versus 89.2% (p = 0.005). No significant difference in outcomes was found between the RNI and non-RNI groups in patients with a score of 4-6. In patients with cN1 and ypN0-1, RNI was found to significantly improve DMFS following NAT. Patients with a Neo-Bioscore of 1-3 are more likely to benefit from RNI, however a large prospective study is needed to confirm this finding.