Node-negative Breast Cancer Patients Research Articles

Abstract PO3-23-07: Evaluation of the role of axillary ultrasound to estimate axillary nodal burden to guide de-escalation of upfront axillary surgery in node positive early breast cancer patients

Abstract Background: Axillary surgery is now routinely de-escalated in clinically node negative breast cancer patients with limited axillary nodal burden (up to 2 involved sentinel nodes) based on the results of ACOSOG-Z0011 and AMAROS trials. However, patients with proven axillary metastasis following on ultrasound (AUS) guided core needle biopsy (CNB), undergoing primary surgery are still subjected to an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) irrespective of the magnitude of the axillary nodal burden. If we could predict axillary nodal burden with a low false negative rate (FNR) for the presence of extensive axillary nodal involvement, we can then hypothesize that axillary surgery could be safely de-escalated in this cohort of patients. We investigated whether pre-operative AUS suggesting limited axillary burden is sensitive enough to rule out gross axillary disease burden. Methods: A single institution retrospective study. We undertook an electronic chart review of all T1 to T3 patients undergoing upfront ALND with either mastectomy or breast conserving surgery between January 2019 and June 2023. Patients with palpable axillary nodes, locally advanced breast cancer or a completion ALND after positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) were excluded from the study. Clinical and pathological characteristics associated with nodal burden of disease were evaluated. Limited axillary burden was defined as < 2 involved nodes with ≥3 taken as gross nodal burden for primary analyses. Sensitivity analyses were carried out with limited axillary burden defined as < 3 involved nodes (N1) and ≥4 (N2) taken as gross nodal burden. Subgroup analyses in T1 or T2 tumors were carried out as well. The probabilities of discordant events, defined as limited burden on AUS-CNB but gross burden on final histopathology evaluation (HPE), assuming 10% FNR, were estimated using inverse cumulative binomial distribution function. Results: Data on the exact number of suspicious nodes on AUS were missing for 2 patients, therefore, the final study cohort included 39 patients. The correlation between AUS nodal burden and that on HPE was moderate (Spearman’s rho = 0.48; p = 0.0018). The sensitivity and specificity of AUS in identifying gross nodal burden were 61% and 81% respectively. Observation of 9 discordant events in 22 patients with low burden on AUS ruled out an FNR of < 10% with 99.99% certainty. The sensitivity and specificity in T1/T2 subgroup were 60% and 75% respectively. The sensitivity analyses classifying N1 as limited and N2 as gross axillary burden showed the sensitivity and specificity of 35% and 82% respectively and an FNR of < 10% was ruled out with 99.996% certainty. Conclusion: Pre-operative AUS alone lacks the sensitivity and specificity to accurately predict the true axillary nodal burden to safely guide de-escalation of axillary surgery. AUS followed by targeted axillary dissection (TAD) in conjunction with a dual technique SLNB may provide the desired sensitivity and specificity to guide de-escalation of axillary surgery. A prospective evaluation of this approach is merited. Given the limited number of patients that could be enrolled in such prospective study from individual institutions, an international collaborative effort is needed to address this important research question. Citation Format: Nidhi Garg, Mangesh Thorat, Hisham Hamed, Ashutosh Kothari. Evaluation of the role of axillary ultrasound to estimate axillary nodal burden to guide de-escalation of upfront axillary surgery in node positive early breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-23-07.

Abstract PO5-26-12: Optimizing Treatment Decisions in Microinvasive Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Evaluating the Need for Surgical Axillary Staging

Abstract Background: Surgical axillary staging is often debated in patients with microinvasive ductal carcinoma in situ (T1mi) due to the low occurrence of nodal metastasis. Axillary surgery (ASx) is associated with risks like seroma, wound complications, lymphedema, and sensory deficits. This study aims to assess the utility of surgical axillary staging in clinically node-negative (cN0) T1mi breast cancer patients and provide insights for optimizing high value surgical treatment and subsequent decision-making. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to investigate axillary status of patients with cT1mi breast cancer between 2012 and 2019. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment methods and pathologic findings were collected. Comparisons were made between those who did and did not undergo ASx, and of those who did, between patients who were pathologically node-positive (pN+) vs. node-negative (pN-). Results: Of 10,843 patients analyzed, 9,220 (85.0%) underwent ASx while 1,623 (15.0%) did not. Mean age of patients undergoing ASx and those who did not was 59.2±11.2 and 66.3±12.8 years, respectively (p< 0.001). On univariate analysis, other factors associated with undergoing ASx were having private insurance, fewer medical comorbidities, having a HER2+ or triple negative phenotype, higher grade, presence of lymphovascular invasion and undergoing mastectomy (all p< 0.05). Sentinel lymphadenectomy was performed in 83% of patients while axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was performed in 17% of patients. Final pathology demonstrated an upgrade to a true invasive cancer (T1 or greater) in 29.3% of cases. Of 9,069 patients who underwent ASx with known pathologic nodal status, 8,512 (93.9%) were pN- and 557 (6.1%) were pN+. Factors independently associated with increased odds of having positive nodes were younger age (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03, p< 0.001), Black race (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.12-2.10, p=0.007), lymphovascular invasion (OR 13.72, 95% CI 10.25-18.36, p< 0.001), and undergoing mastectomy (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.57-2.51, p< 0.001). Among the pN+ patients, only 64 (0.7%) had ≥3 total positive nodes and would require ALND. On subset analysis of the 4,190 patients undergoing mastectomy, 244 (5.8%) did not undergo ASx, while 3,946 (94.2%) did, of whom 373 (9%) were pN+. Regarding adjuvant treatments in this group, more patients who underwent ASx received chemotherapy (12% v. 8%, p< 0.001), and among those who did undergo surgery those who were pN+ were much more likely to receive chemotherapy (58% v. 12%, p< 0.001). However, similar proportions of patients who did and did not undergo ASx received adjuvant radiation (5% v. 4%, p=0.65), while, as expected, among those undergoing ASx, a higher proportion who were pN+ underwent radiation (32% v. 5%, p< 0.001). Conclusion: Surgical axillary staging for T1mi breast cancer is common, but many patients are node-negative. More patients are undergoing ALND than necessary based on pathology. Nodal status influences adjuvant therapy decisions. Identifying factors linked to upgrade and higher pN+ probabilities can enable personalized surgical treatments, reducing morbidity for most patients. Citation Format: Christian Lava, Karen Li, Lauren Berger, Daisy Spoer, Lindy Rosal, Austin Williams, Monika Masanam, Ian Greenwalt, Jennifer Son, Lucy De La Cruz. Optimizing Treatment Decisions in Microinvasive Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Evaluating the Need for Surgical Axillary Staging [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-26-12.

Abstract PO1-19-03: The T-REX trial: a randomized international non-inferiority trial on Tailored Regional EXternal beam radiotherapy in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients with 1-2 sentinel node macrometastases

Abstract Background: Modern systemic treatment has reduced the incidence of regional recurrences and improved survival in breast cancer (BC). It is thus questionable whether regional radiotherapy (RT) is still indicated in patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) macrometastases. Postoperative regional RT is associated with an increased risk of arm morbidity, pneumonitis, cardiac disease, and secondary cancer. Therefore, there is a need to individualize the indication for regional RT in relation to risk of recurrence. Trial design: In this multicenter, prospective randomized phase 3 trial, eligible patients have a clinically node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative BC with 1-2 SLN macrometastases, and have not undergone completion axillary lymph node dissection. Participants are randomly assigned to receive regional RT (standard arm) or not (intervention arm). Regional RT includes the axillary levels I-III and the supraclavicular fossa. Internal mammary nodes are targeted in selected patients. After breast-conserving surgery (BCS), RT to the remaining breast is given in both groups while after mastectomy, chest-wall RT is only given in the standard arm. In the intervention arm, chest wall RT may be indicated in selected cases with extensive multifocality, according to national guidelines. RT quality assurance is an integral part of the trial. In addition, material from the primary tumor, SLN metastases and any recurrences is subjected to gene expression analysis to identify both prognostic markers for locoregional recurrence and predictive markers for the benefit of regional RT. After confirmation of eligibility and written informed consent, patients are randomized 1:1 between the treatment arms. Allocation is stratified by trial site and breast surgery (BCS vs. mastectomy). Participation in T-REX should not affect decisions on systemic adjuvant treatment. Eligibility criteria: Trial inclusion and exclusion criteria are given in Table 1. Specific aims: The main aim of the trial is to investigate if the omission of regional RT is non-inferior to routine regional RT in clinically node-negative BC patients with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative T1-2 tumors with 1-2 SLN macrometastases not receiving axillary lymph node dissection. Secondary aims are to investigate whether refraining from regional RT reduces arm morbidity and late RT side effects, and improves short- and long-term health-related quality of life. In addition, the use of genomic classifiers for the prognostication of locoregional recurrences and the prediction of a benefit from regional RT will be investigated. Statistical methods: Primary outcome is recurrence free survival (RFS) at five years. Non-inferiority will be declared if the outcome in the intervention arm is not more than 4.5 percentage units below the standard arm, corresponding to a hazard ratio of 1.41 assuming 88% 5-year RFS with standard treatment. Secondary outcomes include locoregional recurrence, overall survival, patient-reported arm morbidity, and health-related quality of life. Accrual: The trial will include 1350 patients in Sweden, Norway and Finland from April 2023 to December 2028. First sites have been opened in April 2023. Contact information: Primary Investigator: Sara Alkner, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, sara.alkner@med.lu.se. Responsible for the biobank: Per Karlsson, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg University, per.karlsson@oncology.gu.se. Inclusion and exclusion criteria Citation Format: Sara Alkner, Jana de Boniface, Dan Lundstedt, Ingvil Mjaaland, Lisa Rydén, Johan vikström, Pär-Ola Bendahl, Erik Holmberg, Helena Sackey, Elinore Wieslander, Per Karlsson. The T-REX trial: a randomized international non-inferiority trial on Tailored Regional EXternal beam radiotherapy in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients with 1-2 sentinel node macrometastases [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-19-03.

Ensemble-based classification using microRNA expression identifies a breast cancer patient subgroup with an ultralow long-term risk of metastases.

Current clinical markers overestimate the recurrence risk in many lymph node negative (LNN) breast cancer (BC) patients such that a majority of these low-risk patients unnecessarily receive systemic treatments. We tested if differential microRNA expression in primary tumors allows reliable identification of indolent LNN BC patients to provide an improved classification tool for overtreatment reduction in this patient group. We collected freshly frozen primary tumors of 80 LNN BC patients with recurrence and 80 recurrence-free patients (mean follow-up: 20.9 years). The study comprises solely systemically untreated patients to exclude that administered treatments confound the metastasis status. Samples were pairwise matched for clinical-pathological characteristics to minimize dependence of current markers. Patients were classified into risk-subgroups according to the differential microRNA expression of their tumors via classification model building with cross-validation using seven classification methods and a voting scheme. The methodology was validated using available data of two independent cohorts (n = 123, n = 339). Of the 80 indolent patients (who would all likely receive systemic treatments today) our ultralow-risk classifier correctly identified 37 while keeping a sensitivity of 100% in the recurrence group. Multivariable logistic regression analysis confirmed independence of voting results from current clinical markers. Application of the method in two validation cohorts confirmed successful classification of ultralow-risk BC patients with significantly prolonged recurrence-free survival. Profiles of differential microRNAs expression can identify LNN BC patients who could spare systemic treatments demanded by currently applied classifications. However, further validation studies are required for clinical implementation of the applied methodology.

Carbon nanoparticles versus patent blue dye for detection of sentinel lymph node in patients with early breast cancer

Background Sentinel lymph nodes biopsy (SLNB) has replaced axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in a considerable percentage of patients with early-stage breast cancer which was a great advance in preventing many surgical complications and enhancing their health welfare. Although there are different sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) tracers with different identification rates, there is no agreement about the idealistic method. Aim The study was designed to compare carbon nanoparticles and patent blue v dye regarding SLNs detection rate, number of SLNs, time of detection, metastatic SLNs, cost, and safety in patients with early breast cancer and clinically node-negative axilla. Patients and methods A total of 40 patients with axillary lymph node-negative early-stage breast cancer patients were divided into two groups and subjected to carbon nanoparticles and patent blue V dye in group A and group B, respectively. Patients who were pregnant or lactating had node-positive axilla (N1-3) or metastatic breast cancer (M1) or had neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. Results The mean age was 48.3±9.5 and 47 ±8.9, while the mean BMI of 33.3±4.8 and 32.834±4.862, the SLN detection rates were 95% and 90% in groups A and B, respectively. A total of 128 sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were removed from patients in the two groups (65 with Carbon Nanoparticles and 63 with patent blue dye). The mean number of SLNs was 3.4±0.7 (range, 2–5) and 3.5±1.2 (range, 2–7), mean time of SLNs detection was 13.5±4.5 (range, 7–22) and 12.7± 3.6 (range, 7–18 min) between group A and B, respectively. Conclusion There is no significant difference between carbon nanoparticles and patent blue dye regarding axillary SLNs in early breast cancer regarding identification rate, number of SLNs, time of detection, metastatic SLNs, cost, and safety with slight preference to carbon nanoparticles regarding postoperative skin staining and Egyptian market availability.

Nonmetastatic Axillary Lymph Nodes Have Distinct Morphology and Immunophenotype in Obese Patients with Breast Cancer at Risk for Metastasis

Obese breast cancer patients have worse outcomes than their normal weight counterparts, with a 50% to 80% increased rate of axillary nodal metastasis. Recent studies suggest a link between increased lymph node adipose tissue and breast cancer nodal metastasis. Further investigation into potential mechanisms underlying this link may reveal potential prognostic utility of fat-enlarged lymph nodes in breast cancer patients. This study uses a deep learning model to identify morphological differences in non-metastatic axillary nodes between obese, node-positive and node-negative breast cancer patients. The model was developed using nested cross-validation on 180 cases and achieved an AUC of 0.67 in differentiating patients using hematoxylin and eosin stained whole-slide images. The top predictive patches from the slides according to the model were reviewed by a pathologist and their morphological differences were quantified. This analysis showed an increased average adipocyte size (p-value=0.004), increased white space between lymphocytes (p-value<0.0001), and increased red blood cells (p-value<0.001) in non-metastatic lymph nodes of node-positive patients. Preliminary immunohistochemistry analysis on a subset of 30 patients showed a trend of decreased CD3 expression and increased leptin expression in fat-replaced axillary lymph nodes of obese, node-positive patients. These findings suggest a novel direction to further investigate the interaction between lymph node adiposity, lymphatic dysfunction, and breast cancer nodal metastases, highlighting a possible prognostic tool for obese breast cancer patients.

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) -A, -C and VE-cadherin as potential biomarkers in early breast cancer patients

BackgroundVascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) -A and -C act as multifunctional molecules and growth factors, while VE-cadherin (cadherin 5, CDH5) is the endothelial junction protein. AimTo assess the relationship between intratumoral VEGF -A, -C and CDH5 levels and clinical outcome, in primary, early-stage, breast cancer patients. Patients and methodsThe study included 69 node-negative (N0) breast cancer patients, all of whom had not received any prior hormonal or chemotherapeutic systemic therapy that would affect the course of disease. The median follow-up period was 144 months. Intratumoral mRNA levels of VEGF -A, -C and CDH5 were determined by RT-qPCR. Prognostic performance was evaluated by Cox proportional hazards regression, Kaplan-Meier analysis, as well as by the multivariable approach based on the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logit regression. Classification of patients into the low and high subgroups was performed using the outcome-oriented cut-off point categorization approach. ResultsOf the measured mRNAs, only CDH5 mRNA (t = −2.17; p = 0.04) and VEGF-C mRNA (t = −2.41; p = 0.03) showed significant differences between values in patient subgroups with distant metastasis and those without recurrences, respectively. These t-test results were in agreement with the Cox regression by which CDH5 mRNA reached the most pronounced hazard ratio (HR=2.07; p = 0.05), followed by VEGF-C mRNA (HR=1.59; p = 0.005). HR values above 1.0 indicate that high levels of either CDH5 or VEGF-C mRNAs associated with a higher risk of poor clinical outcome. Distant recurrence incidence was 26% for the CDH5high and 3% for the CDH5low subgroup (Kaplan–Meier analysis). Distant recurrence incidence was 23% for the VEGF-Chigh and 0% for VEGF-Clow subgroup. The independent prognostic value of VEGF-C mRNA was confirmed by LASSO regression. ConclusionIntratumoral VEGF-A levels did not associate with disease outcome in primary, early-stage, breast cancer patients, whilst raised levels of either CDH5 or VEGF-C prognosticated a high risk of distant metastasis.

Partial Axillary Dissection after Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy In Clinically Node-Negative Breast Cancer Patients

Partial Axillary Dissection after Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy In Clinically Node-Negative Breast Cancer Patients

Clinicopathological Factors Associated with Oncotype DX Risk Group in Patients with ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer.

Oncotype DX (ODX), a 21-gene assay, predicts the recurrence risk in early breast cancer; however, it has high costs and long testing times. We aimed to identify clinicopathological factors that can predict the ODX risk group and serve as alternatives to the ODX test. This retrospective study included 547 estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, and lymph node-negative breast cancer patients who underwent ODX testing. Based on the recurrence scores, three ODX risk categories (low: 0-15, intermediate: 16-25, and high: 26-100) were established in patients aged ≤50 years (n = 379), whereas two ODX risk categories (low: 0-25 and high: 26-100) were established in patients aged >50 years (n = 168). Factors selected for analysis included body mass index, menopausal status, type of surgery, and pathological and immunohistochemical features. The ODX risk groups showed significant association with histologic grade (p = 0.0002), progesterone receptor expression (p < 0.0001), Ki-67 (p < 0.0001), and p53 expression (p = 0.023) in patients aged ≤50 years. In patients aged >50 years, tumor size (p = 0.022), Ki-67 (p = 0.001), and p53 expression (p = 0.001) were significantly associated with the risk group. Certain clinicopathological factors can predict the ODX risk group and enable decision-making on adjuvant chemotherapy; these factors differ according to age.

Protocol for the T-REX-trial: tailored regional external beam radiotherapy in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients with 1-2 sentinel node macrometastases – an open, multicentre, randomised non-inferiority phase 3 trial

IntroductionModern systemic treatment has reduced incidence of regional recurrences and improved survival in breast cancer (BC). It is thus questionable whether regional radiotherapy (RT) is still beneficial in patients with...

Long-term outcomes and predictors of recurrence in node-negative early stage breast cancer patients.

We evaluated the outcomes, and risk factors for recurrence in patients with early stage node-negative breast cancer in this study. Retrospective data analysis was done on patient treatment records from 1988 to 2018. The patient's demographic, clinical, pathological, and therapeutic characteristics were noted. To evaluate survival analysis and predictors of recurrence, we employed Kaplan-Meier analysis with the log-rank test. A total of 357 patients in all were enrolled in the research. At the time of diagnosis, the median age was 50 (with a range of 18-81). A total of 85.5% of patients had undergone a lumpectomy, while 14.5% had a mastectomy. 78.7% of patients had sentinel lymph node biopsy, and 21.3% had axillary lymph node dissection. In addition, the patients received adjuvant radiotherapy (88.7%), adjuvant endocrine therapy (82.1%), and adjuvant chemotherapy (48.5%). Recurrence of the tumor occurred in 31 (8.7%) patients (local recurrence 45.2% and metastatic disease 54.8%). Ten- and twenty-year recurrence-free survival rates were 92% and 77%. 19 (5.3%) patients had also developed contralateral breast cancer. Ten-year survival rates were 91.6%, and 20-year survival rates were 76.6%, respectively. Aged over 65years (p = 0.004), necrosis (p = 0.002), mitosis (p = 0.003), and nuclear pleomorphism (p = 0.049) were found as statistically significant factors for recurrence in univariate analysis. In the ROC analysis, the largest size of the tumor (over 1.45cm, p = 0.07) remained outside the statistical significance limit in terms of recurrence. Thirty-year outcomes in individuals with early stage, node-negative breast cancer were shown in this study. We found that the recurrence ratios between 10 and 20 years were more frequent than the first 10 years during the follow-up. Despite the small number of patients who experienced a recurrence, we demonstrated that, in univariate analysis, being older than 65 and having some pathological characteristics (nuclear pleomorphism, mitosis, and necrosis) were statistically significant factors for disease recurrence.

The budget impact of utilizing the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score test from a US healthcare payer perspective

Background and objectivesThe Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score test is used to estimate distant recurrence risk of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2–) early-stage breast cancer and inform decisions on the use of adjuvant chemotherapy. A model-based budget impact analysis compared the Oncotype DX test in combination with clinical–pathological risk against using clinical–pathological risk alone for HR+/HER2– node-negative (N0) and node-positive (N1; 1–3 axillary lymph nodes) early-stage breast cancer patients.Materials and methodsTest and medical costs associated with treatment of breast cancer were assessed through a US healthcare payer perspective. Distributions of patients by Recurrence Score result and distant recurrence probabilities with chemo-endocrine and endocrine therapy were derived from the TAILORx (N0) and RxPONDER (N1) trials. Changes in budget impact were evaluated over a 5-year horizon for a 1,000,000-member hypothetical health plan.ResultsWith the Oncotype DX test, there was an incremental budget impact of $261,067 (per member per month (PMPM): $0.004), in the N0 population, and $56,143 (PMPM: $0.001) in the N1 population over the 5-year period. The largest budget impact reduction in the N0 population was attributed to reduced breast cancer recurrence costs (incremental: −$633,457, PMPM: −$0.011), while chemotherapy sparing reduced costs in the N1 population (incremental: −$94,884, PMPM: −$0.002).ConclusionThe clinical benefit of using the Oncotype DX test to inform adjuvant chemotherapy decisions has been shown in multiple randomized controlled trials. This analysis demonstrated that while using the Oncotype DX test to inform adjuvant chemotherapy decisions may slightly increase US healthcare costs over an initial 5-year time horizon (driven by a cost increase in the first year with cost savings reflected in remaining 4 years), there is significant scope for cost savings when assessing beyond this period due to avoided downstream costs of distant recurrence and long-term chemotherapy adverse events. PMPM costs also remain low across all populations examined, demonstrating a close-to-neutral budget impact.

ASO Visual Abstract: Intraoperative Pathology Assessment May Lead to Overtreatment of the Axilla in Clinically Node-Negative Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Upfront Mastectomy.

ASO Visual Abstract: Intraoperative Pathology Assessment May Lead to Overtreatment of the Axilla in Clinically Node-Negative Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Upfront Mastectomy.

ASO Visual Abstract: Breast-Conserving Therapy is Associated with Improved Survival without an Increased Risk of Locoregional Recurrence Compared to Mastectomy in Both Clinically Node Positive and Node Negative Breast Cancer Patients.

ASO Visual Abstract: Breast-Conserving Therapy is Associated with Improved Survival without an Increased Risk of Locoregional Recurrence Compared to Mastectomy in Both Clinically Node Positive and Node Negative Breast Cancer Patients.

Intraoperative Pathology Assessment May Lead to Overtreatment of the Axilla in Clinically Node-Negative Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Upfront Mastectomy.

Randomized trials have established the safety of observation or axillary radiation (AxRT) as an alternative to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with limited nodal disease who undergo upfront surgery. Variability remains in axillary management strategies in cN0 patients undergoing mastectomy found to have one to two positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). We examined the impact of intraoperative pathology assessment in axillary management in a national cohort of AMAROS-eligible mastectomy patients. The National Cancer Database was used to identify AMAROS-eligible cT1-2N0 breast cancer patients undergoing upfront mastectomy and SLN biopsy (SLNB) and found to have one to two positive SLNs, from 2018 to 2019. We constructed a variable defining intraoperative pathology as 'not performed/not acted on' if ALND was either not performed or performed at a later date than SLNB, or 'performed/acted on' if SLNB and ALND were completed on the same day. Adjusted multivariable analysis examined predictors of treatment with both ALND and AxRT. Overall, 8222 patients with cT1-2N0 disease underwent upfront mastectomy and had one to two positive SLNs. Intraoperative pathology was performed/acted on in 3057 (37.2%) patients. These patients were significantly more likely to have both ALND and AxRT than those without intraoperative pathology (41.0% vs. 4.9%; p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, the strongest predictor of receiving both ALND and AxRT was use of intraoperative pathology (odds ratio 8.99, 95% confidence interval 7.70-10.5; p<0.001). We advocate that consideration should be made for omission of routine intraoperative pathology in mastectomy patients likely to be recommended postmastectomy radiation to minimize axillary overtreatment with both ALND and AxRT in appropriate patients.

Breast-Conserving Therapy is Associated with Improved Survival Without an Increased Risk of Locoregional Recurrence Compared with Mastectomy in Both Clinically Node-Positive and Node-Negative Breast Cancer Patients.

Randomized trials demonstrated equivalent survival between breast-conserving surgery combined with radiotherapy (BCT) and mastectomy alone. Contemporary retrospective studies using pathological stage have reported improved survival with BCT. However, pathological information is unknown before surgery. To mimic real-world surgical decision-making, this study assesses oncological outcomes by using clinical nodal status. Female patients aged 18-69 years who were treated with upfront BCT or mastectomy between 2006 and 2016 for T1-3N0-3 breast cancer were identified by using prospective, provincial database. The patients were divided into clinically node-positive (cN+) and node-negative (cN0) strata. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the effect of local treatment type on overall survival (OS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and locoregional recurrence (LRR). Of 13,914 patients, 8228 had BCT and 5686 had mastectomy. Mastectomy patients had higher-risk clinicopathological factors: pathologically positive axillary staging was 21% in BCT and 38% in mastectomy groups. Most patients received adjuvant systemic therapy. For cN0 patients, 7743 had BCT and 4794 had mastectomy. On multivariable analysis, BCT was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.37, p<0.001) and BCSS (HR 1.32, p<0.001), whereas LRR was not different between the groups (HR 0.84, p=0.1). For cN+ patients, 485 had BCT and 892 had mastectomy. On multivariable analysis, BCT was associated with improved OS (HR 1.46, p=0.002) and BCSS (HR 1.44, p=0.008), whereas LRR was not different between the groups (HR 0.89, p=0.7). In the era of contemporary systemic therapy, BCT was associated with better survival than mastectomy, without an increased risk of locoregional recurrence for both cN0 and cN+ presentations.

Computational pathology improves risk stratification of a multi-gene assay for early stage ER+ breast cancer

Prognostic markers currently utilized in clinical practice for estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) and lymph node-negative (LN−) invasive breast cancer (IBC) patients include the Nottingham grading system and Oncotype Dx (ODx). However, these biomarkers are not always optimal and remain subject to inter-/intra-observer variability and high cost. In this study, we evaluated the association between computationally derived image features from H&E images and disease-free survival (DFS) in ER+ and LN− IBC. H&E images from a total of n = 321 patients with ER+ and LN− IBC from three cohorts were employed for this study (Training set: D1 (n = 116), Validation sets: D2 (n = 121) and D3 (n = 84)). A total of 343 features relating to nuclear morphology, mitotic activity, and tubule formation were computationally extracted from each slide image. A Cox regression model (IbRiS) was trained to identify significant predictors of DFS and predict a high/low-risk category using D1 and was validated on independent testing sets D2 and D3 as well as within each ODx risk category. IbRiS was significantly prognostic of DFS with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.33 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.02–5.32, p = 0.045) on D2 and a HR of 2.94 (95% CI = 1.18–7.35, p = 0.0208) on D3. In addition, IbRiS yielded significant risk stratification within high ODx risk categories (D1 + D2: HR = 10.35, 95% CI = 1.20–89.18, p = 0.0106; D1: p = 0.0238; D2: p = 0.0389), potentially providing more granular risk stratification than offered by ODx alone.

Nomogram for predicting axillary upstaging in clinical node-negative breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

The prediction of axillary lymph node status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) becoming critical because of the advocation of the de-escalation of axillary management. We investigate associated factors of axillary upstaging in clinical node-negative (cN0) breast cancer patients receiving NAC to develop and validate an accurate prediction nomogram. We retrospectively analyzed 1892 breast cancer patients with stage of cT1-3N0 treated by NAC and subsequent surgery between 2010 and 2020 in twenty hospitals across China. Patients randomly divided into a training set and validation set (3:1). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed, after which a nomogram was constructed and validated. In total, pathologic node negativity (ypN0) achieved in 1406 (74.3%) patients and another 486 (25.7%) patients upstaged to pathologic node positive (ypN+). Breast pathologic complete response (bpCR) was achieved in 445 (23.5%) patients and non-bpCR in 1447 (76.5%) patients. A nomogram was established by ER, tumor histology, HER2 status, cycle of NAC treatment, and the bpCR, which were confirmed by multivariate logistic analysis as independent predictors of nodal upstaging in the training cohort (n = 1419). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the training cohort and validation cohort (n = 473) were 0.73 (95% CI 0.693-0.751) and 0.77 (95% CI 0.723-0.812) respectively. We present a nomogram with a nationwide large sample data which can effectively predict axillary upstaging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy to give better advice for individualized axillary lymph node management of breast cancer.

P012 Survival outcomes and toxicities of adjuvant docetaxel-cyclophosphamide for four cycles in node negative triple negative and HER2 positive Chinese breast cancer patients: A 10 year follow up study

P012 Survival outcomes and toxicities of adjuvant docetaxel-cyclophosphamide for four cycles in node negative triple negative and HER2 positive Chinese breast cancer patients: A 10 year follow up study

Adjuvant Docetaxel in Node-Negative Breast Cancer Patients: A Randomized Trial of AGO-Breast Study Group, German Breast Group, and EORTC-Pathobiology Group

In node-negative breast cancer (NNBC), a high risk of recurrence is determined by clinico-pathological or tumor-biological assessment. Taxanes may improve adjuvant chemotherapy. NNBC 3-Europe, the first randomized phase-3 trial in node-negative breast cancer (BC) with tumor-biological risk assessment, recruited 4146 node-negative breast cancer patients from 2002 to 2009 in 153 centers. Risk assessment was performed by clinico-pathological factors (43%) or biomarkers (uPA/PAI-1, urokinase-type plasminogen activator/its inhibitor PAI-1). High-risk patients received six courses 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m2), epirubicin (100 mg/m2), cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2) (FEC), or three courses FEC followed by three courses docetaxel 100 mg/m2 (FEC-Doc). Primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). In the intent-to-treat population, 1286 patients had received FEC-Doc, and 1255 received FEC. Median follow-up was 45 months. Tumor characteristics were equally distributed; 90.6% of tested tumors had high uPA/PAI-1-concentrations. Planned courses were given in 84.4% (FEC-Doc) and 91.5% (FEC). Five-year-DFS was 93.2% (95% C.I. 91.1-94.8) with FEC-Doc and 93.7% (91.7-95.3) with FEC. Five-year-overall survival was 97.0% (95.4-98.0) for FEC-Doc and 96.6% % (94.9-97.8) for FEC. With adequate adjuvant chemotherapy, even high-risk node-negative breast cancer patients have an excellent prognosis. Docetaxel did not further reduce the rate of early recurrences and led to significantly more treatment discontinuations.