Lupus Low Disease Activity State Research Articles

Molecular basis for the disease-modifying effects of belimumab in systemic lupus erythematosus and molecular predictors of early response: blood transcriptome analysis implicates the innate immunity and DNA damage response pathways

ObjectivesBelimumab is a putative disease-modifying agent in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), yet the molecular underpinnings of its effects and the ability to predict early clinical response remain unexplored. To address...

Implementation of the Lupus Low Disease Activity State in Pediatric Rheumatology Care: The Role of the Visual Analog Scale.

We compared the measurement properties of a traditional physician global assessment of disease activity (PhGA) 10-cm visual analog scale (PhGA0-10) with that of the three-point numeric scale (PhGA0-3) in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) as part of the childhood Lupus Low Disease Activity State (cLLDAS). We used a secondary data analysis from a convenience sample of 100 patients with cSLE followed every three months for up to seven visits. Ratings of PhGA0-10, PhGA0-3, parent assessment of patient well-being (ParGA) (range: 0= very poorly, 10 = very well), disease activity as measured by the SLE disease activity index 2000 (SLEDAI-2k), Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment (SELENA) SLEDAI, and the British Isles International Lupus Activity Group index (BILAG; A = 9, B = 3, C = 1, D/E = 0) were compared. After linear transformation of PhGA0-10 to a 0 to 3 range (tPhGA0-10), the frequency of PhGA0-3 ≤1 was assessed to estimate the impact of scale type on the scoring of the cLLDAS. In 600 visits, the median (range) scores of PhGA0-10, PhGA0-3, SLEDAI-2k, SELENA-SLEDAI, and BILAG were 2 (0-10), 1(0-3), 4 (0-28), 4 (0-32), and 2 (0-28), respectively. PhGA0-10 and PhGA0-3 ratings were strong to moderately correlated with (r = 0.73; P < 0.0001) and with more variability for PhGA0-3 ≥2. SELENA-SLEDAI and SLEDAI-2k scores were moderately correlated with PhGA0-10 (r = 0.56/0.54; P < 0.0001). ParGA values were weakly correlated with all other measures considered (all r = -0.19 to -0.34). There were 490 of 600 visits with PhGA0-3 ≤1 and 497 of 600 visits with tPhGA0-10 ≤1 (κ (SE) =0.59 (0.04), McNemar P = 0.4). PhGA0-3 and PhGA0-10 have comparable measurement properties and yield almost identical cLLDAS rates when used in cSLE.

Infection-Associated Flares in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is characterised by generalised immune dysfunction, including infection susceptibility. Infection-associated flares (IAFs) are common and might rapidly self-resolve, paralleling infection resolution, but their specific clinical phenotype is poorly understood. Therefore, we screened 2039 consecutive visits and identified 134 flares, defined as a loss of the lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS), from 1089 visits at risk spanning over multiple follow-up years, yielding an average yearly LLDAS deterioration rate of 17%. Thirty-eight IAFs were isolated from the total flares and were mostly related to bacterial and herpesvirus infections. When compared to other flares (OFs; n = 98), IAFs showed no milder patterns of organ involvement and similar rates of long-term damage accrual, as estimated by conventional clinimetrics. Arthritis in IAFs was more severe than that in OFs [median (interquartile range) DAS-28 2.6 (2.3–4.1) vs. 2.0 (1.6–2.7); p = 0.02]. Viral IAFs were characterised by atypically lower levels of anti-DNA antibodies (p &lt; 0.001) and possibly abnormally high complement levels when compared to flares of different origin. These data suggest that IAFs are of comparable or even higher severity than OFs and may subtend distinct pathophysiological mechanisms that are poorly tackled by current treatments. Further research is needed to confirm these data.

Predictive biomarkers for low-dose IL-2 therapy efficacy in systemic lupus erythematosus: a clinical analysis

BackgroundLow-dose IL-2 (Ld-IL2) has shown favorable therapeutic effects in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) therapy. However, previous clinical trials reported an SLE Responder Index-4 (SRI-4) response rate of 65.52%-68%, with approximately half failing to achieve the primary endpoint by week 24. Our study aims to determine the real-world use of Ld-IL2 and to identify determinants of its effectiveness in SLE.MethodsWe pooled data from 342 SLE patients undergoing sequential Ld-IL2 treatment, with 314 persisting for over 3 months were included in effectiveness and prediction analyses. All patients were categorized into responder (n = 136) and non-responder group (n = 178) according to SRI-4. Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) was also analyzed to validate our results.ResultsRash, lower complement 3 (C3), and renal involvement including urine protein, urine occult blood and urine casts emerged as prominent predictors of achieving SRI-4. Adjusting for baseline values using the ratio of change to baseline revealed significant differences in CD4 + T cell immune profiles between responders and non-responders. ROC analysis confirmed a satisfactory performance of rash, renal involvement, percentage change of CD4 + T cells, and C3 in predicting SRI-4, yielding an AUC of 0.933. LLDAS analysis showed that hematological involvements and lower CLA + Treg were potent predictive markers in LLDAS attainment. Conversely, renal involvement failed to have significant association in achieving LLDAS. The analysis of background therapy in SLE patients showed that MMF was more likely to reach the SRI-4 response with the combination of Ld-IL2.ConclusionsThese findings uncovered the predictors of Ld-IL2 treatment efficacy in SLE patients and provided guidance to physicians for rational utilization.

Racial Disparities and Achievement of the Low Lupus Disease Activity State (LLDAS): A CARRA Registry Study.

Differential disease control may contribute to racial disparities in outcomes of childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE). We evaluated associations of race and individual- or neighborhood-level social determinants of health (SDoH) with achievement of low lupus disease activity state (LLDAS), a clinically relevant treatment target. In this cSLE cohort study using the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) Registry, the primary exposure was self-reported race and/or ethnicity and collected SDoH included insurance status and area deprivation index (ADI). Outcomes included LLDAS, disease activity, and time-averaged prednisone exposure. Associations between race and/or ethnicity, SDoH, and disease activity were estimated with multivariable regression models, adjusting for disease-related and demographic factors. Among 540 children with cSLE, 27% identified as Black, 25% White, 23% Latino/a, 11% Asian, 9% more than one race, and 5% Other. More Black children (41%) lived in neighborhoods of highest ADI compared to White children (16%). Black race was associated with lower LLDAS achievement (adjusted OR 0.56, 95% CI: 0.38-0.82) and higher disease activity (adjusted β: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.11, 1.78). Highest ADI was not associated with lower LLDAS achievement upon adjustment for renal disease and insurance. However, renal disease was found to be a significant mediator (p=0.04) of the association between ADI and prednisone exposure. Children with cSLE identifying as Black are less likely to achieve LLDAS and have higher disease activity. Living in areas of higher ADI may relate to renal disease and subsequent prednisone exposure. Strategies to address root causes will be important to design interventions mitigating cSLE racial disparities.

Clinical outcomes in lupus nephritis patients treated with belimumab in real-life setting: a retrospective comparative study in China.

The use of belimumab in treating lupus nephritis (LN) patients in China is still in its early stages. This retrospective comparative study aims to delineate the disease activity, associated therapies, clinical outcomes, and adverse events among LN patients treated with belimumab, reflecting real-world experience in southeastern China. From May 2020 to December 2023, 54 LN patients treated with belimumab and 42 LN patients treated with conventional therapy were enrolled. All patients had a follow-up period of more than 3 months. The general information, presenting clinical and laboratory data, and outcomes were collected and compared. At 3 months of belimumab treatment, compared to baseline, there was a decrease in proteinuria from 74.1% to 64.8% (p<0.001), a reduction in hematuria from 59.3% to 37.0% (p=0.008), and an increase in partial or complete renal response from 53.7% to 75.9% (p<0.001). The median SLEDAI score decreased from 10 to 5 (p<0.001), and the proportion of patients achieving low lupus disease activity state (LLDAS) increased from 11.11% to 16.67% (p<0.001) by the 3-month evaluation. Notably, there were significant reductions in oral corticosteroid dosages, with a median decrease from 30 to 17.5 mg/day (p<0.001) by 3 months, and the proportion of patients requiring >5 mg/day of steroids decreased from 88.89% at baseline to 79.07% at six months (p<0.001). Compared to the conventional therapy group, the belimumab group experienced a significant reduction in median steroid dosage and increased the proportion of patients achieving remission or LLDAS. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was significantly lower in the belimumab group (29.6% vs 52.4%, p=0.024). These findings support the potential of belimumab to improve renal and serological parameters, reduce disease activity, lessen corticosteroid dependence, and decrease the risk of TEAEs, demonstrating its safety and efficacy as an adjunct therapy in LN management.

Use of belimumab in treating patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a single-center, real-world retrospective study

ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and safety of belimumab in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in a real-world setting and provide a valuable reference for clinical treatment.MethodsIn this retrospective study, 101 patients with SLE who came to our hospital from March 2020 to September 2022, 56 of whom with lupus nephritis (LN), were selected. All patients received belimumab in combination with standard of care(SoC)therapy regimen for more than 52 weeks and their clinical/laboratory data, assessment of disease activity, glucocorticoids dosage and occurrence of adverse events were recorded. Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) and DORIS remission as a primary goal in the treatment of SLE. The groups were classified according to the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2 K): SLEDAI-2 K < 6 was categorized as the mild group (mild activity) and SLEDAI-2 K ≥ 6 was categorized as the active group (moderate-severe activity). The disease of the two groups mentioned above were assessed using the SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index (SFI) and the SLE Responder Index-4 (SRI-4), respectively. Furthermore, we used complete remission (CR) and partial remission (PR) in the kidney as the standard for efficacy evaluation for LN patients.ResultsAfter 52 weeks of treatment with belimumab, patients’ complement levels increased significantly (p < 0.05); Other indicators such as 24-hour urine protein quantification and daily glucocorticoids dose decreased compared to pretreatment (p < 0.05). At 52 weeks, (i) after evaluation, the whole group of patients showed significant improvement in their condition; (ii) 55.4% of patients achieved LLDAS and 23.8% achieved DORIS remission; (iii) 73.2% of patients with LN achieved CR, 16.1% achieved PR. Adverse reactions were observed in 15 patients (14.9%), all of which normalized after symptomatic treatment.ConclusionsIn general, during treatment with belimumab, immunological and biochemical indices improved in SLE patients, urinary protein levels were reduced in LN patients, and the rate of renal function remission was effectively increased; At the same time, the use of belimumab is associated with a low frequency of side effects, good overall tolerability and a favorable safety profile.

Mycophenolate Mofetil and New-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Anti-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibody has been reported to have a close relationship with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) flares and participates in the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis (LN) as well as causing damage to other organs. However, whether early use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) could prevent SLE flares is not clear. To assess the efficacy and safety of MMF plus prednisone and hydroxychloroquine sulfate compared with prednisone and hydroxychloroquine sulfate alone in patients with SLE. This investigator-initiated, multicenter, observer-blinded randomized clinical trial enrolled 130 participants aged 18 to 65 years and was conducted in 3 hospitals across China. Treatment-naive patients with newly diagnosed SLE, a high titer of anti-dsDNA antibody, and no major organ involvement were included. The study was started September 1, 2018, and the follow-up was completed September 30, 2021. Data were analyzed from December 1, 2021, to March 31, 2022. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive oral prednisone (0.5 mg/kg/d) and hydroxychloroquine sulfate (5 mg/kg/d) (control group) or prednisone (0.5 mg/kg/d) and hydroxychloroquine sulfate (5 mg/kg/d) plus MMF (500 mg twice daily) (MMF group) for 96 weeks. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients presenting with flares according to the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) Flare Index. The secondary outcomes included the proportion with lupus low disease activity state at week 96, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey scores before and after treatment, proportion of adverse events (AEs), and changes in SLEDAI-2000 scores and prednisone doses. Among 130 randomized patients (mean [SD] age, 34.5 [12.5] years; 112 [86.2%] women), 119 (91.5%) completed the follow-up. The risk of severe flare was significantly lower in the MMF group (7 of 65 [10.8%]) vs the control group (18 of 65 [27.7%]) (relative risk [RR], 0.39 [95% CI, 0.17-0.87]; P = .01). Additionally, 1 of 65 patients in the MMF group (1.5%) and 9 of 65 in the control group (13.8%) manifested LN (RR, 0.11 [95% CI, 0.01-0.85]; P = .008). Most common serious study drug-related AEs were infections (20 of 65 [30.8%] in the control group and 22 of 65 [33.8%] in the MMF group). The findings of this randomized clinical trial suggest that MMF may reduce the rate of severe flare and lower the incidence of LN in patients with new-onset SLE and a high titer of anti-dsDNA antibody without major organ involvement. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR1800017540.

Characterisation and outcomes of different subsets of low disease activity states in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

ObjectivesThe lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) allows for certain clinical and/or serological activity of SLE, provided overall disease activity does not exceed predefined cut-offs. This study aimed to evaluate...

Longitudinal analysis at pre- and post-flare of T peripheral helper and T follicular helper subsets in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

ObjectiveWe focused to analyze the time-course changes at pre- and post-flare of T peripheral helper (Tph) cells and circulating T follicular helper (Tfh) cells in the blood of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) before flare. MethodsThis study included inactive (n = 29) and active (n = 55) patients with SLE. Tph subsets, Tfh subsets, CD11chi B cells, and plasma cells in the blood were determined by flow cytometry. The blood levels of cytokines including interferons (IFNs) were measured by electrochemiluminescence assay or cytokine beads array. ResultsActive SLE patients exhibited the increased frequency of Tph1, Tph2, Tfh1, and Tfh2 subsets when compared to inactive patients, but no clear changes in the other subsets. During the treatment with medications, Tph1, Tph2, and Tfh2 subsets were significantly reduced along with disease activity and Tph1 and Tph2 subsets were positively correlated with SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI). The time course analysis of patients at pre- and post-flare revealed that in the patients at LLDAS before flare, Tph subsets and Tfh subsets were relatively low levels. At the flare, Tph cells, particularly Tph1 and Tph2 subsets, were increased and correlated with SLEDAI. Furthermore, the blood levels of IFN-α2a, IFN-γ, and IFN-λ1 were low in the patients with LLDAS before flare but these IFNs, particularly IFN-λ1, were increased along with flare. ConclusionIncreased frequency of Tph1 and Tph2 subsets and elevated levels of serum IFN-λ1 are presumably critical for triggering of flare in SLE.

Treatment selection in the clinical practice of systemic lupus erythematosus: results from the Kyushu Collagen Disease Network for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (KCDN-SLE) registry.

This study aimed to describe the treatment selection for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) using data from the Kyushu Collagen Disease Network for SLE (KCDN-SLE) registry, a multicenter prospective registry in Japan. This study used data from patients registered between August 2022 and November 2023. Clinical characteristics, purpose of agent initiation, other candidate agents, and short-term efficacy and safety were evaluated. We analyzed 69 previously treated patients with SLE (mean age 43.7 years; 62 females, 7 males). Hydroxychloroquine, biological agents, and immunosuppressive agents were initiated during the maintenance phase in 12, 41, and 16 patients, respectively. In patients with active organ involvement, hydroxychloroquine and biological agents were widely used for initiation. In those who already achieved treatment goals, biological agents alone were predominantly selected. The SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 score and prednisolone dose declined significantly over a 6-month follow-up period. Among 48 patients with active disease, 22 achieved a lupus low disease activity state, but this had no evident association with the initiation of a biological agent. In total, 14 adverse events, predominantly infections, were observed. Biological agents were used preferentially, and the therapeutic agents were appropriately effective and mostly achieved the purpose of agent initiation.

Attainment of remission and low disease activity after treatment with belimumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a post-hoc analysis of pooled data from five randomised clinical trials

Disease remission or low disease activity are key treatment targets for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Pivotal trials of belimumab were conducted before the introduction of these targets. In this study, we aimed to pool data across trials to assess attainment of remission and low disease activity in a large, racially and culturally diverse patient population with SLE. In this integrated post-hoc analysis, we pooled data from five phase 3 trials of belimumab (BLISS-76 [NCT00410384], BLISS-52 [NCT00424476], BLISS-NEA [NCT01345253], BLISS-SC [NCT01484496], and EMBRACE [NCT01632241]), in patients with active, autoantibody-positive SLE. Patients were randomly assigned to receive belimumab (10 mg/kg per month intravenously or 200 mg per week subcutaneously) or placebo, plus standard therapy. The proportion of patients with Definitions of Remission in SLE (DORIS) remission and lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) were analysed every 4 weeks from week 4 to week 52 for belimumab versus placebo, using modified Poisson regression adjusted for trial variance, in all patients and in subgroups per baseline SLE Disease Activity Index-2000 score (<10 or ≥10); anti-double stranded DNA positivity (yes or no); low complement 3 (C3) or C4 levels (yes or no); anti-dsDNA positivity or low C3 or C4 levels (yes and no); prednisone-equivalent dose (≤7·5 mg per day or >7·5 mg per day); antimalarial use (yes or no); and by race (Black African ancestry or African American, Asian, Indigenous American, or White). Data for 3086 patients (1869 in the belimumab group and 1217 in the placebo group) were analysed. 2913 (94%) of 3086 patients were women and 173 (6%) were men, and the median age was 36 years (IQR 28-45). The proportion of patients with DORIS remission was significantly higher in the belimumab group than the placebo group at weeks 28, 48, and 52 (week 52: 148 [8%] of 1869 participants vs 68 [6%] of 1217 participants; risk ratio 1·51 [95% CI 1·15-1·99]; p=0·0055). The proportion of patients who attained LLDAS was higher in the belimumab group than the placebo group at weeks 8, 24, 32-52 (week 52: 322 [17%] of 1869 participants vs 125 [10%] of 1217 participants; 1·74 [1·44-2·12]; p<0·0001). A higher proportion of patients had DORIS remission at week 52 in the belimumab group than the placebo group among all baseline subgroups denoting high disease activity, with the exception of those on a prednisone-equivalent dose higher than 7·5 mg per day in whom there was no difference for DORIS remission with belimumab versus placebo. The proportion of patients with LLDAS was significantly higher among patients in the belimuab group than those who received placebo from week 44 in all baseline subgroups denoting high disease activity or earlier in some subgroups, and the differences were maintained at week 52. In adults with active SLE, belimumab plus standard therapy yielded greater benefit than placebo plus standard therapy in attaining DORIS remission (for which low rates were attained in both groups) and LLDAS, with differences observed as early as week 28 for DORIS remission and week 8 for LLDAS. Swedish Rheumatism Association, King Gustaf V's 80-year Foundation, Swedish Society of Medicine, Nyckelfonden, Professor Nanna Svartz Foundation, Ulla and Roland Gustafsson Foundation, Region Stockholm, and the Karolinska Institutet.

When is the right time to change therapy? An observational study of the time to response to immunosuppressive drugs in systemic lupus erythematosus

ObjectivesTo analyse the response to immunosuppressants (IS) in extrarenal flares of SLE to determine the most appropriate timing during follow-up for a change in therapeutic strategy.MethodsObservational cohort study including a...

Real-world effectiveness of belimumab in patients with lupus in China: RELIABLE observational cohort study protocol

IntroductionThe efficacy of belimumab in SLE has been demonstrated in randomised clinical trials, and its real-world effectiveness has been shown in studies in several countries. While belimumab was approved for...

Anifrolumab in Refractory Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Real-World, Multicenter Study.

To report real-world experience on the use of anifrolumab (ANI) in refractory systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The present study is a multicenter, retrospective study involving 9 Italian SLE referral centers participating in a compassionate use program for the use of ANI in adult patients with active SLE in whom all the available treatment choices failed, were not tolerated, or were contraindicated. At baseline and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of treatment, overall and organ-specific disease activity, flares, daily glucocorticoid (GC) dose, and adverse events were recorded. A total of 26 patients were enrolled. At 4 weeks after starting ANI, a significant decrease in the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (P = 0.01), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus-Disease Activity Score (P = 0.01), and physician global assessment (P = 0.001) was recorded, and the same trend was maintained over time. A significant reduction in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index-activity (P < 0.001) and in tender (P = 0.03) and swollen (P = 0.02) joint counts was also recorded. At 3 months of follow-up, 33% of patients already achieved a remission state, whereas 46% were in Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS); at 6 months, 50% were in remission and 80% were in LLDAS. A significant reduction in the mean GC daily dose was observed, starting from week 4 (P = 0.04). A total of 4 disease flares according to the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index were recorded (3 mild-moderate and 1 severe). Overall, 4/20 patients with at least 24 weeks of follow-up (20%) were considered nonresponders. This study provides real-world experience on the use of ANI in patients with refractory SLE, confirming its rapid effectiveness and an overall acceptable safety profile.

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Anifrolumab in Moderate-to-Severe Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease, which poses significant challenges due to its chronic nature and complex clinical manifestations.For patients with moderate-to-severe SLE, anifrolumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets the type 1 interferon receptor (IFNAR), has emerged as a cutting-edge treatment option that can reduce disease activity, prevent organ damage from the illness or side effects resulting from medications, and enhance the quality of life for those living with SLE. Consequently, this drug has received approval from major regulatory agencies. Anifrolumab's safety, effectiveness, and long-term results are assessed in this systematic review using information from clinical trials, real-world research, and retrospective analysis. In particular, clinical investigations, such as the MUSE Phase II and TULIP Phase III trials, showed that anifrolumab significantly improved important outcomescompared to placebo, including the SLE Responder Index, major clinical response, and disease activity ratings. During extended use, anifrolumab demonstrated significant sustained efficacy and a tolerable safety profile, with controllable side events mostly associated with viral infections. Moreover, subgroup analyses, demonstrating that Asian patients and individuals with a strong interferon gene profile are particularly responsive to anifrolumab, underscore the importance of customized treatment methods. Anifrolumab's safety and effectiveness were further validated by real-world data, particularly in patients who reached the Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS), where the drug decreased glucocorticoid consumption and disease activity. Overall, anifrolumab shows great promise as a treatment for moderate-to-severe SLE, providing significant efficacy together with a manageable safety profile. To fully explore its therapeutic potential and optimize therapy approaches for the management of SLE, further research is necessary, especially in lupus nephritis and other disease subsets.

Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib or Elsubrutinib Alone or in Combination for Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial.

The 48-week, phase 2 SLEek study (NCT03978520) evaluated the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib (JAK inhibitor) and elsubrutinib (BTK inhibitor) alone or in combination (ABBV-599) in adults with moderately to severely active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Patients were randomized 1:1:1:1:1 to elsubrutinib 60 mg and upadacitinib 30 mg once daily (ABBV-599 high dose), elsubrutinib 60 mg and upadacitinib 15 mg once daily (ABBV-599 low dose), elsubrutinib 60 mg once daily (QD), upadacitinib 30 mg QD, or placebo QD. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving both Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) and glucocorticoid dose ≤10 mg QD at week 24. Additional assessments through week 48 included British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) and Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) responses, number of flares, time to first flare, and adverse events. The study enrolled 341 patients. The ABBV-599 low dose and elsubrutinib arms were discontinued after a planned interim analysis showed lack of efficacy (no safety concerns). More patients achieved the primary endpoint with upadacitinib (54.8%; P = 0.028) and ABBV-599 high dose (48.5%; P = 0.081) versus placebo (37.3%). SRI-4, BICLA, and LLDAS response rates were higher for both upadacitinib and ABBV-599 high dose versus placebo at weeks 24 and 48. Flares were reduced, and time to first flare through week 48 was substantially delayed with both upadacitinib and ABBV-599 high dose versus placebo. No new safety signals were observed beyond those previously reported for upadacitinib or elsubrutinib. Upadacitinib 30 mg alone or in combination with elsubrutinib (ABBV-599 high dose) demonstrated significant improvements in SLE disease activity and reduced flares and were well tolerated through 48 weeks.

Position on the use of anifrolumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus with insufficient efficacy of standard therapy in real-life clinical practice. Comments from Russian experts

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease characterized by unpredictable exacerbations and outcome. Many SLE patients receiving standard therapy (ST) do not achieve the recommended treatment goal of remission or Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS). Currently, there is still great dissatisfaction with ST in SLE, especially with long-term treatment with glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants. The recently approved type I interferon receptor antagonist anifrolumab (AFM) may be promising in SLE patients who do not respond adequately to ST. Phase III efficacy studies of AFM have demonstrated higher remission rate and lower LLDAS activity in patients treated with AFM compared to placebo. This publication contains comments from Russian experts on the article by Y. Tanaka “Viewpoint on anifrolumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and a high unmet need in clinical practice”.

Molecular characterisation of lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) and DORIS remission by whole-blood transcriptome-based pathways in a pan-European systemic lupus erythematosus cohort

ObjectivesTo unveil biological milieus underlying low disease activity (LDA) and remission versus active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).MethodsWe determined differentially expressed pathways (DEPs) in SLE patients from the PRECISESADS project (NTC02890121)...

Association of sustained lupus low disease activity state with improved outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus: a multinational prospective cohort study

Validation of protective associations of the lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) against flare, irreversible damage, health-related quality of life, and mortality has enabled the adoption of treat-to-target strategies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Previous validation studies were of short duration, limiting the ability to detect longer term signals in flare rate and irreversible damage. In addition, previous studies have focused on percent time at target, rather than actual periods of time that are more useful in clinical practice and trials. We assessed long-term protective associations of LLDAS and remission, and specifically examined protective thresholds of sustained LLDAS and remission. Patients aged 18 years or older with SLE were followed up from May 1, 2013, to Dec 31, 2020 in a prospective, multinational, longitudinal cohort study. Patients were recruited from 25 centres in 12 countries. Multi-failure time-to-event analyses were used to assess the effect of sustained LLDAS on irreversible damage accrual (primary outcome; measured with the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index) and flare (key secondary outcome; measured with the SELENA Flare Index), with dose exposure and threshold effects studied. Sustained LLDAS or remission were defined as two or more consecutive visits over at least 3 months in the respective state. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03138941. 3449 patients were followed up for a median of 2·8 years (IQR 1·1-5·6), totalling 37 662 visits. 3180 (92·2%) patients were women, and 3031 (87·9%) were of Asian ethnicity. 2506 (72·7%) patients had sustained LLDAS at least once. Any duration of sustained LLDAS or remission longer than 3 months was associated with reduced damage accrual (LLDAS: hazard ratio 0·60 [95% CI 0·51-0·71], p<0·0001; remission: 0·66 [0·57-0·76], p<0·0001) and flare (LLDAS: 0·56 [0·51-0·63], p<0·0001; remission: 0·66 [0·60-0·73], p<0·0001), and increasing durations of sustained LLDAS corresponded to increased protective associations. Sustained DORIS remission or steroid-free remission were less attainable than LLDAS. We observed significant protective associations of LLDAS and remission against damage accrual and flare, establish a threshold of 3 months sustained LLDAS or remission as protective, and demonstrate deepening protection with longer durations of sustained LLDAS or remission. The Asia Pacific Lupus Collaboration receives project support grants from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, EMD Sereno, GSK, Janssen, Eli Lilly, and UCB.