Lung Cancer In Spain Research Articles

1577P Indoor radon in patients with lung cancer in Spain: Preliminary data from the MIRROR study

1577P Indoor radon in patients with lung cancer in Spain: Preliminary data from the MIRROR study

Trends in lung cancer incidence in Spain (1990-2019): insights from Global Burden of Diseases data.

This study examines lung cancer incidence in Spain (1990-2019) through age-period-cohort (A-P-C) analysis and Global Burden of Diseases (GBD) data, unravelling the complex interplay of age, period, and birth cohort in shaping these trends. Utilizing GBD and Spanish population data, the study calculates age-standardized incidence rates (ASIRs) and employs Joinpoint analysis to identify significant trends. A-P-C analysis dissects the individual effects of age, calendar period, and birth cohort on incidence patterns. Between 1990 and 2019, almost 738,000 cases of lung cancer were diagnosed in Spain, with an average annual increase of 1.7%. The ASIR of lung cancer in Spain from 1990 to 2019 showed a sustained upward trend in women (Average Annual Per cent Change: 2.5%, P < 0.05), reaching 23.3 cases per 100,000 in 2019, whilst men experienced a significant decrease in incidence rates (AAPC: -0.6%, P < 0.05), falling to 108.9 in 2019. The male-to-female incidence ratio decreased from 12.2 in 1992 to 4.9 in 2019. Joinpoint analysis identified distinct periods for both sexes, with men showing stability, decline and then a significant decrease, whereas women showed an initial increase followed by a decrease. The longitudinal age curves showed a consistently higher incidence risk in men, peaking in the 80-84 age group. Male cohorts since the 1920s showed a decreasing relative risk, whereas women showed fluctuations in risk over time. Lung cancer rates are falling in Spain, especially amongst men, due to lower smoking rates. The gender gap is closing, but prevention targeted at women is needed. Tighter tobacco control and research into other risk factors are essential. Understanding the long-term effects of smoking and early exposure is key to better prevention and treatment in Spain.

Cost-effectiveness of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin as first line treatment for patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer in Spain

IntroductionLung cancer is the third most frequent neoplastic tumour in Spain, with around 27 000 new cases diagnosed per year; 80-95% of these are non-small-cell cancer (NSCLC), and the majority of cases are diagnosed in advanced stages of the disease, and for this reason it is one of the oncologic conditions with higher mortality rates (21.4% mean survival at 5 years).The main treatment regimens used for first-line treatment of NSCLC are: cisplatin/pemetrexed (cis/pem), cisplatin/gemcita- bine/bevacizumab (cis/gem/bev), and carboplatin/paclitaxel/ bevacizumab (carb/pac/bev). The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness ratio of antineoplastic 1st line NSCLC treatment regimens, from the point of view of hospital management. MethodologyA cost-efficacy mathematical model was prepared, based on a decision tree. The efficacy variable was Progression Free Survival, obtained from the PARAMOUNT, AVAIL and SAIL Phase III clinical trials. The study was conducted from the perspective of the hospital management, considering only the direct costs of drug acquisition. A deterministic sensitivity analysis was conducted to confirm the robustness of outcomes. ResultsThe PFS obtained in clinical trials with cls/pem, cis/ gem/bev and carb/pac/bev was: 6.9, 6.7 and 6.2 months, respectively. Based on our model, the mean cost of treatment per patient for these regimens was: 19942€, 15594 € and 36095€, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per month of additional PFS between cls/pem and cls/gem/bev was 19303€. Estimating a 30% reduction in acquisition costs for pemetrexed (Alimta®Eli Lilly Nederland B.V.), due to the forthcoming launch of generic medications, the cis/pem treatment would become the predominant alternative for 1st line treatment of NSCLC patients, by offering the best health results at a lower cost.

Addressing lung cancer screening eligibility in Spain using 2013 and 2021 US Preventive Service Task Force criteria: cross-sectional study

ObjectivesThe aim of the study was to ascertain the percentage of Spanish lung cancer cases that would fulfil the lung cancer screening inclusion criteria recommended by the United States Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF) in 2013 and 2021.MethodsA cross-sectional study was carried out. All lung cancer cases registered in the Thoracic Tumor Registry with data on date of birth, date of diagnosis, smoking habit, number of pack-years and time elapsed since smoking cessation were included.ResultsThe study included 15 006 patients diagnosed with lung cancer in Spain between 2016 and 2022. Eligibility to participate in screening increased from 53.7% to 63.5% (an increase of 9.8%) according to the 2013 and 2021 recommendations, respectively. The percentage of eligible men rose by 9.2 percentage points with the 2021versus2013 recommendations, whereas this rise was 11.5 percentage points in women. Under the 2021 recommendations, 36.6% of women and 5.3% of men would not have fulfilled the screening inclusion criteria due to being never-smokers; 14.9% of women and 11.0% of men would not have fulfilled the age criterion; and 27.0% of ex-smokers among women compared to 35.6% among men would not have been eligible due to &gt;15 years having elapsed since smoking cessation.ConclusionsIn Spain, over one-third of lung cancer cases could not be detected through screening, by virtue of not meeting the most recent inclusion criteria stated by the USPSTF. The degree of fulfilment in a potential nationwide screening programme should be analysed, with the aim of establishing inclusion criteria in line with each country's context.

1278P ORIGEN: Multicenter study on the prevalence of EGFR gene mutations in patients with early-stage resectable non-small cell lung cancer in Spain

1278P ORIGEN: Multicenter study on the prevalence of EGFR gene mutations in patients with early-stage resectable non-small cell lung cancer in Spain

Real-world treatment patterns and survival outcomes for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer in Spain: a nationwide cohort study.

The burden of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains high in Spain, with lung cancer accounting for 20% of cancer-related deaths annually. Programs such as the Spanish Thoracic Tumour Registry (TTR) and the global I-O Optimise initiative have been developed to observe patients in clinical practice with the aim of improving outcomes. This analysis examined treatment patterns and survival in patients with stage III NSCLC from the TTR. These patients represent a heterogenous group with complex treatment pathways. The TTR is an ongoing, observational, prospective, and retrospective cohort multicentre study (NCT02941458) that follows patients with thoracic cancer in Spain. Adults aged ≥18 years with stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC enrolled in the TTR between 01 Jan 2010 and 31 Oct 2019 were included in this analysis. Initial treatment received was described by cancer stage and histology (squamous and non-squamous NSCLC). Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated over a 5-year period. A total of 1,838 patients were included in the cohort, including 1,082 with stage IIIA (58.9%) and 756 with stage IIIB (41.1%). Median follow-up was 18.3 months. The median age of patients was 66 years, and most had non-squamous NSCLC (54.0%), were male (81.2%), and were active or former smokers (93.4%). Overall, 26.3% of patients received surgical resection (37.0% for stage IIIA and 11.1% for stage IIIB). The most frequent initial treatment received was concurrent chemoradiotherapy for stage IIIA (30.2%) and stage IIIB (37.0%) patients. Median OS was lower in patients with stage IIIB than stage IIIA (28 vs. 37 months) disease and was lower for patients with squamous than non-squamous histology (19 vs. 26 months). Median PFS and OS varied when patients were stratified by initial treatment. This TTR analysis describes the clinical reality surrounding the initial management and survival outcomes for stage III NSCLC in Spain and presents survival outcomes comparable with other real-world evidence. It provides insights into the diverse approaches used before the availability of immunotherapies and targeted treatments in the non-metastatic NSCLC setting.

Cost-Effectiveness of Lorlatinib for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Spain.

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficiency of lorlatinib compared to alectinib and brigatinib for the treatment of adult patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously not treated, in Spain. A partitioned survival model comprised progression free, non-intracranial progression, intracranial progression, and death health states was constructed to estimate the total costs, life-years gained (LYG) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) accumulated in a lifetime horizon. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for lorlatinib were obtained from the CROWN study. For alectinib and brigatinib, a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted to estimate OS and PFS hazard ratios versus crizotinib. Utilities were estimated based on EQ-5D-5L data derived from the CROWN (lorlatinib), ALEX (alectinib) and ALTA-1L (brigatinib) studies. According to the Spanish National Health Service perspective the total costs (expressed in euros using a 2021 cost year) included drug acquisition and the administration's subsequent treatment, ALK+ advanced NSCLC management and adverse-event management, and palliative care. Unitary costs were obtained from local cost databases and literature. Costs, LYGs and QALYs were discounted at 3% annually. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to test the model's robustness. Lorlatinib provided higher health outcomes (+0.70 LYG/patient, +1.42 QALYs/patient) and lower costs (-€9239/patient) than alectinib. Lorlatinib yielded higher LYG (+1.74) and QALYs (+2.30) versus brigatinib but higher costs/patient (+€36,627), resulting in an incremental-cost-effectiveness-ratio of €15,912/QALY gained. The results of this study suggest that lorlatinib may be a dominant treatment option versus alectinib. Considering a willingness-to-pay threshold of €25,000/QALY, lorlatinib may be an efficient option compared to brigatinib.

35P Drug treatment management of advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer in Spain: A real-world cross-sectional analysis

35P Drug treatment management of advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer in Spain: A real-world cross-sectional analysis

Economic burden of locoregional and metastatic relapses in resectable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer in Spain

BackgroundThere are scarce data of the costs of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) recurrence in Spain. The objective of this study is to assess the economic burden of disease recurrence, for both locoregional and/or metastatic relapses, after appropriate early-stage NSCLC treatment in Spain.Materials and methodsA two-round consensus panel of Spanish oncologists and hospital pharmacists was conducted to collect information on patient’s flow, treatments, use of healthcare resources and sick leaves in patients with relapsed NSCLC. A decision-tree model was developed to calculate the economic burden of disease recurrence after appropriate early-stage NSCLC. Both direct and indirect costs were considered. Direct costs included drug acquisition and healthcare resources costs. Indirect costs were estimated using the human-capital approach. Unit costs were obtained from national databases (euros of 2022). A multi-way sensitivity analysis was performed to provide a range to the mean values.ResultsAmong a cohort of 100 patients with relapsed NSCLC, 45 patients would have locoregional relapse (36.3 would eventually progress to metastasis and 8.7 would be considered in remission) and 55 patients would have metastatic relapse. Over time, 91.3 patients would experience a metastatic relapse (55 as first relapse and 36.6 after previous locoregional relapse). The overall cost incurred by the 100-patients cohort is €10,095,846 (€9,336,782 direct costs, €795,064 indirect costs). The average cost of a locoregional relapse is €25,194 (€19,658 direct costs, €5536 indirect costs), while the average cost a patient with metastasis who receives up to 4 lines of treatment is €127,167 (€117,328 direct, €9839 indirect).ConclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first study that specifically quantifies the cost of relapse in NSCLC in Spain. Our findings shown that the overall cost of a relapse after appropriate treatment of early-stage NSCLC patients is substantial, and it increases considerably in the metastatic relapse setting, mainly due to the high cost and long duration of first-line treatments.

Cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab versus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in PD-L1-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Spain

BackgroundAtezolizumab has recently been approved for first-line treatment of high PD-L1 expression metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients with no EGFR or ALK mutations, on the basis of the IMpower110 trial. This study aims to estimate the cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab compared with pembrolizumab among these patients in Spanish settings, based on the results of the two cut-offs of the IMpower110 study.MethodsA three-state partitioned-survival model was adapted to Spanish settings to calculate health outcomes and costs over a lifetime horizon. Clinical data for atezolizumab were collected from the interim and the exploratory results (data cut-off: Sept’18 and Feb’20, respectively) of the IMpower110 trial while a network meta-analysis was used to model pembrolizumab treatment. Utility data were collected from the trial. Direct medical costs were considered based on resources identified by experts. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3% per year. Health outcomes were expressed as cost per Life Year (LY) and cost per Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY). Both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of results.ResultsOver a lifetime horizon, the incremental results showed that atezolizumab generated similar health outcomes (LYs and QALYs) to pembrolizumab, with minimal differences depending on the cut-off used (+ 0.70 and + 0.42 LYs and QALYs with Sept’18 cut-off and − 0.80 and − 0.72 LYs and QALYs with Feb’20 cut-off). However, for both cut-offs, atezolizumab produced meaningfully less costs than pembrolizumab (€ − 54,261 with Sept’18 cut-off and € − 81,907 with Feb’20 cut-off). The sensitivity analyses carried out confirmed the robustness of the base-case results.ConclusionsThe cost-effectiveness analysis, comparing the two cut-off of IMpower110, shows that atezolizumab provides similar health gains to pembrolizumab but at a lower cost for the first-line treatment of metastasic NSCLC patients in Spain.

Trends in hospitalization and in-hospital mortality rates among patients with lung cancer in Spain between 2010 and 2020

BackgroundLung cancer is the third most frequent tumor and the main cause of death by tumor in Spain. Although the incidence and mortality are still significantly higher in men than in women, the disparity between the sexes is decreasing. The objective of this study was to analyze the evolution of lung cancer hospitalization and in-hospital mortality rates in Spain from 2010 to 2020.MethodsThe reports of the Minimum Basic Data Set (MBDS) at hospital discharge were used to retrospectively analyze the data of all patients with a primary diagnosis of lung cancer, according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM).ResultsBetween 2010 and 2020, there were 315,263 hospitalizations and 70,490 deaths from lung cancer in Spain, the majority (~ 80%) in men. Overall, the rates of hospitalization and in-hospital mortality from lung cancer showed a downward trend throughout the period, although the number of new diagnoses and the absolute number of deaths in women increased. Due to the aging of the population, the degree of comorbidity in patients with lung cancer, although it remains relatively low, is also on the rise.ConclusionLung cancer represents a substantial clinical and economic burden for patients and for the National Health System, so it is necessary to promote primary prevention campaigns, as well as to develop more effective population screening measures to detect cancers early and increase the patient survival.

Cost-benefit analysis of ALK diagnosis vs. non-diagnosis in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in Spain.

In recent years, target therapies to specific molecular alterations in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been identified and have shown superior efficacy compared to non-targeted treatments. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) is one of the therapeutic targets; nevertheless, ALK diagnosis is not performed in all NSCLC patients in Spain. The objective of this study is to estimate in monetary terms the benefit for the Spanish society of ALK diagnosis in advanced NSCLC patients. A cost-benefit analysis of ALK diagnosis vs. non-diagnosis in advanced NSCLC patients was carried out from the Spanish social perspective, with a time horizon of 5 years. Costs, benefits and the cost-benefit ratio were measured. The analysis has considered the overall survival in advanced NSCLC patients treated with the ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) alectinib. The natural history of NSCLC was simulated using a Markov model. A 3% discount rate was applied to both costs and benefits. The result was tested using a deterministic sensitivity analysis. The cost of ALK diagnosis vs. non-diagnosis in the base case would be €10.19 million, generating benefits of €11.71 million. The cost-benefit ratio would be €1.15. In the sensitivity analysis, the cost-benefit ratio could range from €0.89 to €2.10. The results justify the universal application of ALK diagnosis in advanced NSCLC, which generates a benefit for Spanish society that outweighs its costs and allows optimal treatment with targeted therapies for these patients.

58P A predictive model of the diagnostic value of next generation sequencing based genomics testing in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in Spain

ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group recommends use of next generation sequencing (NGS) for the detection of actionable genomic biomarkers in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC). This modeling study was designed to assess the potential improvement of biomarker detection in Spanish patients with mNSCLC when using NGS versus combinations of single gene tests (SGTs).

PD-L1 testing and clinical management of newly diagnosed metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in Spain: MOREL study.

Aim:To describe the clinical management and PD-L1 testing of patients with newly diagnosed stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without driver mutations in Spain.Methods:Multicenter, retrospective study.Results:Among 297 evaluated patients, 89.2% received systemic treatment for stage IV disease, of whom 53.6% received platinum doublet therapy, 26.8% immunotherapy as monotherapy and 14.7% immunotherapy + chemotherapy, with 9.4% receiving treatment as part of a clinical trial. Treatment was initiated 1 month after histological diagnosis, with PD-L1 test results available in most cases (92.6%). PD-L1 testing was performed in 287 patients, 95.1% by in-house tests, mostly with the 22C3 pharmDx assay. The factor most strongly associated with treatment selection was, as expected, the expression of PD-L1.Conclusion:PD-L1 testing is implemented in clinical practice and seems to guide treatment decisions in patients with NSCLC in Spain.

1204P Cost-benefit analysis of ALK diagnosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer in Spain

In recent years, target therapies to specific molecular alterations present in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients have been discovered and have shown superior efficacy compared to non-targeted treatments. Among the molecular alterations identified in NSCLC, the anaplastic lymphoma tyrosine kinase (ALK) receptor, present in 3.4% of patients, is one of the therapeutic targets. The aim of this study was to estimate in monetary terms the value of the benefit of ALK diagnosis in NSCLC in Spain.

6-Year Risk of Developing Lung Cancer in Spain: Analysis by Autonomous Communities

IntroductionLung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has been proposed as a strategy to reduce lung cancer mortality. Since LDCT has side effects there is a need to carefully select the target population for screening programmes. Because in Spain health competences are transferred to the seventeen Autonomous Communities (ACs), the present paper aims to identify individuals at high risk of developing lung cancer in the different ACs. MethodsWe used the 2011–2012 data of the Spanish National Interview Health Survey (n=21,006) to estimate the proportion of individuals at high risk of developing lung cancer using a 6-year prediction model (PLCOm2012). This proportion was then extrapolated into absolute figures for the Spanish population, using the population census data of 2018 from the National Institute of Statistics. ResultsThe proportion of individuals aged 50–74 with a risk of lung cancer ≥2% was 9.5% (15.9% in men, 3.5% in women). This proportion ranged from 6.6% in Región de Murcia to 12.7% in Andalucía and 13.0% in Extremadura. When extrapolated to the Spanish population, it was estimated that a total of 1,341,483 individuals may have a 6-year risk of lung cancer ≥2%. ConclusionsThe present study is the first one that evaluated the number of individuals at high risk of developing lung cancer in the different Spanish ACs using a prediction model and selecting people with a 6-year risk ≥2%. Further studies should assess the cost and effectiveness associated to the implementation of a lung cancer screening programme to such population.

Epidemiology, treatment, and survival in small cell lung cancer in Spain: Data from the Thoracic Tumor Registry.

BackgroundSmall-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive disease with high metastatic potential and poor prognosis. Due to its low prevalence, epidemiological and clinical information of SCLC patients retrieved from lung cancer registries is scarce.Patients and methodsThis was an observational multicenter study that enrolled patients with lung cancer and thoracic tumors, recruited from August 2016 to January 2020 at 50 Spanish hospitals. Demographic and clinical data, treatment patterns and survival of SCLC patients included in the Thoracic Tumor Registry (TTR) were analyzed.ResultsWith a total of 956 cases, the age of 64.7 ± 9.1 years, 78.6% were men, 60.6% smokers, and ECOG PS 0, 1 or ≥ 2 in 23.1%, 53.0% and 23.8% of cases, respectively. Twenty percent of patients had brain metastases at the diagnosis. First-line chemotherapy (CT), mainly carboplatin or cisplatin plus etoposide was administered to >90% of patients. In total, 36.0% and 13.8% of patients received a second and third line of CT, respectively. Median overall survival was 9.5 months (95% CI 8.8–10.2 months), with an estimated rate of 70.3% (95% CI 67.2–73.4%), 38.9% (95% CI 35.4–42.4%), and 14.8% (95% CI 11.8–17.8%) at 6, 12 and 24 months respectively. Median progression-free survival was 6.3 months. Higher mortality and progression rates were significantly associated with male sex, older age, smoking habit, and ECOG PS 1–2. Long-term survival (> 2 years) was confirmed in 6.6% of patients, showing a positive correlation with better ECOG PS, poor smoking and absence of certain metastases at diagnosis.ConclusionThis study provides an updated overview of the clinical situation and treatment landscape of ES-SCLC in Spain. Our results might assist oncologists to improve current clinical practice towards a better prognosis for these patients.

Abstract S12-04: COVID-19 disease in patients with lung cancer in Spain: GRAVID Lung Cancer Patients Disease (GRAVID study)

Abstract Background: Previous reports indicate that lung cancer patients are at an increased risk of severe COVID-19 disease and higher mortality rate compared to general population. However, prognostic factors are not yet clearly identified. The LunG canceR pAtients coVid19 Disease (GRAVID) study aimed to describe clinical characteristics, outcomes and predictors of poor prognosis in patients with lung cancer and COVID-19. Methods: In this large nationwide prospective study, medical records of lung cancer patients with COVID-19 diagnosis from 65 spanish hospitals were included. Clinical features, treatments and disease outcomes were collected. The primary endpoint was to determine any-cause mortality; secondary endpoints were hospitalization and admission at intensive care units (ICU). Risk factors of poor prognosis were identified by univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. Results: Overal, 447 patients were analysed. Mean age was 67.1 ± 9·8 years, and the majority were men (332, 74·3%) and current/former smokers (383 (85.7%). NSCLC was the most frequent cancer type (377, 84.5%), being adenocarcinoma (228, 51·0%) the predominant histology. 354 patients (79.2%) had unresectable stage III or metastatic disease, and 266 (59.5%) where receiving anticancer treatment, mostly first-line chemotherapy. 350 (78.3%) patients were hospitalized for a mean of 13·4 ± 11·4 days, 9 (2.0%) patients were admitted to ICU, and 146 (32.7%) patients died. Advanced disease and corticosteroid treatment at hospitalization were predictors of mortality. Non-terminal stage hospitalized patients with lymphocytopenia and high LDH showed an increased risk of death. Severity of COVID-19 correlated to mortality, admission at ICU and mechanical ventilation. Conclusion: With underlying comorbidities and immunocompromised status, patients with lung cancer and COVID-19 present high hospitalization and mortality rates. These outcomes, alongside the identification of prognostic factors, may inform physicians on risks and benefits for this population to provide individualized oncological care. Citation Format: Jose Maria Mazarico Gallego, Antonio Calles, Monica Antoñanzas, Cristina Pangua, Xabier Mielgo Rubio, Ernest Nadal, Rafael Lopez Castro, Ana Lopez-Martin, Edel del Barco, Manuel Domine, Virginia Calvo, Pilar Diz, Carmen Sandoval, Elia Sais Girona, Ivana Gabriela Sullivan, M. Angeles Sala, Gema Garcia Ledo, Jose Ramon Jarabo, Rosa Alvarez Alvarez, Javier Baena, Maria Gonzalez-Cao, Mariano Provencio. COVID-19 disease in patients with lung cancer in Spain: GRAVID Lung Cancer Patients Disease (GRAVID study) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Meeting: COVID-19 and Cancer; 2021 Feb 3-5. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2021;27(6_Suppl):Abstract nr S12-04.

Overall survival for early and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer from one institution: 2000-2017.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in Spain. The objective of our study was to evaluate the characteristics of patients diagnosed with stages I-III non-small-cell lung cancer, as well as the impact that epidemiological changes, diagnostic improvements and surgical therapeutic innovations have had on survival in the past 20years. Retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with early and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer between years 2000 and 2017 in our institution. A total of 859 patients were included. An increase in the percentage of women diagnosed over time was observed. Statistically significant differences were observed in the mean age at diagnosis, with a progressive increase in the different periods. The percentage of current or former smokers was similar in all periods. Adenocarcinoma was the most frequent histologic type with a progressive increase in its frequency. The percentage of patients diagnosed in early stages has been increasing over the years. In stages I-II, there was a significant increase in the median survival (29.7months: 2000-2004, 68.73months: 2010-2014) that could be seen in stage III as well (14.7months: 2000-2004, 30.63months: 2015-2017). A variation of clinical characteristics of lung cancer in Spain has been observed in recent years, as well as an improvement in survival in early and locally advanced stages, due not only to the treatments, but also to a more accurate detection of these tumors. Little progress has been made in tobacco habit with high stable percentages over the years.

Current status of lung cancer in Spain: a retrospective analysis of patient characteristics, use of healthcare resources and in-hospital mortality

Objective: This study aimed to describe the current status of lung cancer in Spain, including patient characteristics and in-hospital mortality, and to revise disease management and the direct medical costs of secondary care.Methods: A retrospective observational study was set to analyse anonymized primary and secondary care records of patients admitted with lung cancer in Spain between 2011 and 2016. Data were obtained from the Primary Care Dataset and the Centralised Hospital Discharge Database.Results: Admissions files from 12,119 primary care and 113,574 secondary care patients were analyzed. Only 21% of all patients were females, yet the number of female patients presented an increasing trend over the study period. Non-small-cell lung carcinoma represented 85.29% of all lung malignant neoplasms; metastatic or secondary malignant neoplasms were diagnosed in 76.66% of admissions. Other relevant comorbid conditions registered at the hospital level were hypertension, disorders of lipoid metabolism, diabetes mellitus and a history of tobacco use. In-hospital mortality was 22% over the study period and was associated with respiratory failure. Mean hospitalization time was 9.57 days and most admissions were due to emergencies. The mean cost of secondary care per patient was €8475, increasing significantly over the study period. Cost per patient was higher in those diagnosed with a squamous cell carcinoma.Conclusions: Preventive and early detection measures are recommended, continuing to focus on females. In parallel, a multidisciplinary approach could optimize patient journey considering the presence of disease comorbidities, although its role in lung cancer mortality should be further explored.