Lung Adenocarcinoma In Never-smokers Research Articles

Proteogenomic Characterization Reveals Estrogen Signaling as a Target for Never-Smoker Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients without EGFR or ALK Alterations.

The proteogenomic landscape in never-smoker lung cancer without known driver mutations reveals prognostic proteins and enhanced estrogen signaling that can be targeted as a potential therapeutic strategy to improve patient outcomes.

Distinct immune microenvironment of lung adenocarcinoma in never-smokers from smokers

Lung cancer in never-smokers (LCINS) presents clinicopathological and molecular features distinct from that in smokers. Tumor microenvironment (TME) plays important roles in cancer progression and therapeutic response. To decipher the difference in TME between never-smoker and smoker lung cancers, we conduct single-cell RNA sequencing on 165,753 cells from 22 treatment-naive lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients. We find that the dysfunction of alveolar cells induced by cigarette smoking contributes more to the aggressiveness of smoker LUADs, while the immunosuppressive microenvironment exerts more effects on never-smoker LUADs' aggressiveness. Moreover, the SPP1hi pro macrophage is identified to be another independent source of monocyte-derived macrophage. Importantly, higher expression of immune checkpoint CD47 and lower expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-I in cancer cells of never-smoker LUADs imply that CD47 may be a better immunotherapy target for LCINS. Therefore, this study reveals the difference of tumorigenesis between never-smoker and smoker LUADs and provides a potential immunotherapy strategy for LCINS.

Miliary Never-Smoking Lung Adenocarcinoma With Large Pleural Effusion Mimicking Tuberculosis

Miliary Never-Smoking Lung Adenocarcinoma With Large Pleural Effusion Mimicking Tuberculosis

287 Genomic and Immunologic Characterization of Lung Adenocarcinoma in Never Smokers vs. Smokers

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Smoking is a well-established risk factor for lung cancer, but never smokers account for up to 25% of lung cancer cases. There is mounting evidence that lung cancer in never smokers is biologically distinct. We aim to characterize the genomic and immunologic features of lung adenocarcinoma in never smokers versus smokers. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We examined clinical, genomic, and bulk-RNA sequencing data from 499 patients in the TCGA lung adenocarcinoma cohort. Tumor mutation burden was analyzed using maftools (R package). Tumor immune characterization was completed using CIBERSORTx, a digital cytometry tool that uses single cell reference profiles to determine immune cell type frequencies from bulk-RNA sequencing data. Single cell reference profiles for 19 different immune cell types were constructed from sequencing of freshly resected lung tumor tissue from UCSF patients. Partitioning Around Medoids (PAM; R package) was used to identify distinct immune phenotypes based on immune cell composition. Fisher’s exact test was used to evaluate for associations between immune phenotypes and smoking status. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Of the 499 TCGA lung adenocarcinoma patients, 75 were never smokers, 269 were female, and 246 were over the age of 65. Never smokers had lower tumor mutation burden and lower predicted neoantigen burden compared to smokers (p < 0.001). There was no difference in total tumor immune cell infiltration between never smokers and smokers. PAM yielded 2 distinct clusters/immune phenotypes. The first was enriched in M1 Macrophages, cytotoxic T Cells, helper T Cells, regulatory T Cells, and Plasma Cells. The second was enriched in plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells, M2 Macrophages, and exhausted cytotoxic T Cells. Never smoking status was associated with an increased odds of having the first immune phenotype (OR 1.95, 95% CI: 1.15 - 3.35) and this association was statistically significant (p = 0.0086). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings suggest that never smokers have an immune phenotype that is distinct from that observed in smokers. The distinct immune characteristics we observed could explain clinical trial data suggesting immune checkpoint inhibitors are less effective in never smokers and hold implications for tailoring therapy.

Characteristics and immune checkpoint inhibitor effects on non-smoking non-small cell lung cancer with KRAS mutation: A single center cohort (STROBE-compliant).

Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) mutation (KRASm) is associated with poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We have aimed to survey NSCLC patients harboring KRASm in Taiwan, where never-smoking lung adenocarcinoma predominates, and analyze the immune checkpoint inhibitor effect on NSCLC harboring KRASm.NSCLC patients with KRASm were enrolled and tested on programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression using available tissue. We analyzed their clinical features, PD-L1 status, responses to ICIs, and overall survival (OS).We studied 93 patients with a median age 66.0 years, 23.7% of whom were women, and 22.6% were never-smokers. The results showed that G12C (36.6%) was the most common KRASm. In 47 patients with available tissue for PD-L1 testing, PD-L1 expression was positive in 66.0% of patients, while PD-L1 ≥50% was higher in ever-smokers (P = .038). Among 23 patients receiving ICI treatment, those with PD-L1 ≥50% experience a 45.5% response rate to ICI. There were benefits from ICI treatment on OS compared with no ICI treatment (median OS 35.6 vs 9.8 months, P = .002) for all of our patients, and for patients with PD-L1 ≥50% (median OS not-reached vs 8.4 months, P = .008). There were no differences in survival across different KRAS subtypes (P = .666).Never-smokers composed more than one-fifth of KRASm in NSCLC in Taiwan. A high PD-L1 expression was related to smoking history and responded well to ICI. ICI treatment improved the OS in NSCLC patients with KRASm, particularly those with PD-L1 ≥50%.

Chinese never smokers with adenocarcinoma of the lung are younger and have fewer lymph node metastases than smokers

BackgroundLung cancers arising in never smokers have been suggested to be substantially different from lung cancers in smokers at an epidemiological, genetic and molecular level. Focusing on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we characterized lung cancer patients in China looking for demographic and clinical differences between the smoking and never-smoking subgroups.MethodsIn total, 891 patients with NSCLC, including 841 with adenocarcinoma and 50 with squamous cell carcinoma, were recruited in this study. Association of smoking status with demographic and clinical features of NSCLC was determined, and risk factors for lymph node metastasis and TNM stage were evaluated using Multivariate logistic regression analysis.ResultsIn patients with adenocarcinoma, never smokers showed a younger age at diagnosis (54.2 ± 12.7vs. 59.3 ± 9.4, padjusted<0.001), a lower risk for lymph node metastasis than smokers (7,6% vs. 19.5%, padjusted<0.001) and less severe disease as indicated by lower percentages of patients with TNM stage of III or IV (5.5% vs. 14.7%, padjusted<0.001 ). By contrast, these associations were not observed in 50 patients with squamous cell carcinoma. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that smoking status was a risk factor for lymph node metastasis (OR = 2.70, 95% CI: 1.39–5.31, p = 0.004) but not for TNM stage (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.09–14.43, p = 0.896) in adenocarcinoma.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that lung adenocarcinoma in never smokers significantly differ from those in smokers regarding both age at diagnosis and risk of lymph node metastasis, supporting the notion that they are distinct entries with different etiology and pathogenesis.

Genomic Profiling of Lung Adenocarcinoma in Never-Smokers.

Approximately 10%-40% of patients with lung cancer report no history of tobacco smoking (never-smokers). We analyzed whole-exome and RNA-sequencing data of 160 tumor and normal lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) samples from never-smokers to identify clinically actionable alterations and gain insight into the environmental and hereditary risk factors for LUAD among never-smokers. We performed whole-exome and RNA-sequencing of 88 and 69 never-smoker LUADs. We analyzed these data in conjunction with data from 76 never-smoker and 299 smoker LUAD samples sequenced by The Cancer Genome Atlas and Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium. We observed a high prevalence of clinically actionable driver alterations in never-smoker LUADs compared with smoker LUADs (78%-92% v 49.5%; P < .0001). Although a subset of never-smoker samples demonstrated germline alterations in DNA repair genes, the frequency of samples showing germline variants in cancer predisposing genes was comparable between smokers and never-smokers (6.4% v 6.9%; P = .82). A subset of never-smoker samples (5.9%) showed mutation signatures that were suggestive of passive exposure to cigarette smoke. Finally, analysis of RNA-sequencing data showed distinct immune transcriptional subtypes of never-smoker LUADs that varied in their expression of clinically relevant immune checkpoint molecules and immune cell composition. In this comprehensive genomic and transcriptome analysis of never-smoker LUADs, we observed a potential role for germline variants in DNA repair genes and passive exposure to cigarette smoke in the pathogenesis of a subset of never-smoker LUADs. Our findings also show that clinically actionable driver alterations are highly prevalent in never-smoker LUADs, highlighting the need for obtaining biopsies with adequate cellularity for clinical genomic testing in these patients.

Earlier-Phased Cancer Immunity Cycle Strongly Influences Cancer Immunity in Operable Never-Smoker Lung Adenocarcinoma

SummaryExome and transcriptome analyses of clinically homogeneous early-stage never-smoker female patients with lung adenocarcinoma were performed to understand tumor-T cell interactions and immune escape points. Using our novel gene panels of eight functional categories in the cancer-immunity cycle, three distinct subgroups were identified in this immune checkpoint blockade-refractory cohort by defective gene expression in two major domains, i.e., type I interferon production/signaling pathway and antigen-presenting machinery. Our approach could play a critical role in understanding immune evasion mechanisms, developing a method for effective selection of rare immune checkpoint blockade responders, and finding new treatment strategies.

Proteogenomics of Non-smoking Lung Cancer in East Asia Delineates Molecular Signatures of Pathogenesis and Progression

Lung cancer in East Asia is characterized by a high percentage of never-smokers, early onset and predominant EGFR mutations. To illuminate the molecular phenotype of this demographically distinct disease, we performed a deep comprehensive proteogenomic study on a prospectively collected cohort in Taiwan, representing early stage, predominantly female, non-smoking lung adenocarcinoma. Integrated genomic, proteomic, and phosphoproteomic analysis delineated the demographically distinct molecular attributes and hallmarks of tumor progression. Mutational signature analysis revealed age- and gender-related mutagenesis mechanisms, characterized by high prevalence of APOBEC mutational signature in younger females and over-representation of environmental carcinogen-like mutational signatures in older females. A proteomics-informed classification distinguished the clinical characteristics of early stage patients with EGFR mutations. Furthermore, integrated protein network analysis revealed the cellular remodeling underpinning clinical trajectories and nominated candidate biomarkers for patient stratification and therapeutic intervention. This multi-omic molecular architecture may help develop strategies for management of early stage never-smoker lung adenocarcinoma.

Genomic analysis of driver-negative lung adenocarcinoma (LA) in lifetime never smokers.

3571 Background: Genomic events giving rise to driver negative LA in never smokers remain elusive. Here we report results of whole exome sequencing (WES) and targeted RNA sequencing in NS who had no mutation drivers found on routine clinical testing by targeted next generation sequencing (NGS). Methods: The cohort of never smokers with EGFR/ALK negative LA by clinical biomarker testing at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, were first subjected to various clinical NGS profiling platforms (table). Where tissue was available, those negative for potential drivers in the clinical NGS then underwent WES (mean coverage &gt; 200x) and Oncomine comprehensive v.3 RNA sequencing. We analyzed mutational signatures (MS) of the driver negative cohort based on the COSMIC catalog and assessed the median tumor mutation burden (mTMB mut/Mb -Megabase) in cases without a smoking MS, to avoid confounders. Results: Of 159 never smokers profiled with clinical NGS, potential drivers were found in 86 (54%): 75 (87%) with mutations in known LA driver genes and 11 (13%) with fusions. Among the remaining never smokers that tested negative by clinical NGS, 35 (48%) had available tissue for further testing. The Oncomine panel identified 9 cases (25%) with fusions or MET exon14 mutation (n = 7). Within the driver negative group, 24 (92%) underwent WES. Three tumors had WES base substitution patterns that were consistent with a smoking-related MS (MS4). Twenty-one patients exhibited signatures found common across all cancer types (MS 5), associated with DNA mismatch repair (MS 6, MS 20) or APOBEC over-activation (MS 2, MS13). In the driver-negative group, we identified 7 pts with somatic mutations in the KMT2 family (4 KMT2C, 4 KMT2A, 1 KMT2D), known for putative tumor suppressors and histone methyltransferases. mTMB on the driver negative group was 1.92, while one outlier with APOBEC MS and KMT2C/A mutations had a TMB of 16.8. Conclusions: Never smokers with driver negative LA are a heterogeneous group, with different MS and a wide TMB range. Mutations on KMT2 family are frequently found in driver negative LA in never smokers and warrant further investigations. [Table: see text]

First-iGAP: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study of First-line Intercalated Gefitinib and Pemetrexed-Cisplatin Chemotherapy for Never-Smoker Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients

BackgroundWe aimed to evaluate whether intercalated combination of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib and chemotherapy improves survival outcomes in never-smokers with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Patients and MethodsNever-smokers with chemo-naive stage IIIB/IV lung adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to receive either gefitinib or placebo on days 5 to 18 of a 3-weekly cycle of pemetrexed and cisplatin. Chemotherapy was given up to 9 cycles, after which gefitinib or placebo was given daily. Patients in the placebo arm who had progression were crossed over to receive gefitinib. ResultsBetween June 2012 and December 2014, 76 patients with median age of 58.0 years were randomized, 39 on gefitinib and 37 on the placebo arm. EGFR mutation was positive in 34 (44.7%) patients. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the 2 arms. The gefitinib arm had a better response rate (79.5% vs. 51.4%, P = .010) and median progression-free survival (PFS) (12.4 vs. 6.7 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.49, P = .005) than the placebo arm; however, there was no statistically significant difference in median overall survival between the 2 arms (31.8 vs. 22.9 months, HR 0.78, P = .412). The PFS benefit of intercalated use of gefitinib over placebo was more apparent for patients with EGFR-mutant tumors (13.3 vs. 7.8 months, P = .025) than those with EGFR–wild-type tumors (8.2 vs. 6.6 months, P = .063). Overall, there was no difference in the frequency of severe adverse effect between the 2 arms. ConclusionsIntercalated combination of gefitinib with pemetrexed and cisplatin was well tolerated and improved PFS in never-smoker patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

The clinical impact of family history of cancer in female never-smoker lung adenocarcinoma

ObjectivesAccumulating evidence reveals the association between the risk of never-smoker lung cancer and family history of cancer. However, the clinicogenomic effect of family history of cancer in never-smoker lung cancer remains unknown. Material and methodsWe screened 3,241 lung cancer patients who (a) underwent curative resection at National Cancer Center (Goyang, Korea) between 2001–2014, and (b) completed a pre-designed interview about family/smoking history at the time of diagnosis and identified 604 female never smoker lung adenocarcinoma. A positive family history of cancer [categorized as pulmonary cancer (FH-PC) or non-pulmonary cancer (FH-NPC)] was defined as a self-reported history of cancer in first-degree relatives. Survival data were followed up until January 2017. Multiplexed targeted next-generation sequencing was performed for genetic profiling. ResultsOf 604 patients, 29.1% (n = 176) had a FH, including 132 (21.9%) with FH-NPC and 44 (7.3%) with FH-PC. Patients with the FH-NPC had a higher proportion of young patients (≤45 years) than those without the FH-NPC (FH-NPC, FH-PC, and no FH; 13.6%, 2.3%, and 8.2%, respectively; P = 0.032). Patients with the FH-NPC had an increased risk of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.90; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.40–2.56; P<0.001) and death (HR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.18–2.37; P=0.004). In contrast, the FH-PC had no prognostic effect on recurrence (HR: 1.23; 95% CI: 0.71–2.15; P = 0.456) and death (HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.45–1.91; P=0.838). Among three driver oncogene alterations, EGFR mutation was significantly associated with the FH-PC (53.8%, 84.1%, and 65.8%, respectively; P = 0.016), ALK/ROS1/RET fusions was significantly associated with the FH-NPC (13.7%, 0.0%, and 5.0%, respectively; P = 0.004), but KRAS mutation was not associated with any type of the FH (13.8% vs. 6.0% vs. 7.8%, respectively; P = 0.288). ConclusionThe type of family history of cancer was associated with distinct clinocogenomic subtypes and prognosis of never-smoker lung adenocarcinoma.

Indoor radon exposure increases tumor mutation burden in never-smoker patients with lung adenocarcinoma

ObjectivesRadon, a natural radiation, is the leading environmental cause of lung cancer in never-smokers. However, the radon exposure impact on the mutational landscape and tumor mutation burden (TMB) of lung cancer in never-smokers has not been explored. The aim of this study was to investigate the mutational landscape of lung adenocarcinoma in never-smokers who were exposed to various degrees of residential radon. Materials and methodsTo investigate the effect of indoor radon exposure, we estimated the cumulative exposure to indoor radon in each house of patients with lung cancer with a never-smoking history. Patients with at least 2 year-duration of residence before the diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma were included. Patients were subgrouped based on the median radon exposure level (48 Bq/m3): radon-high vs. radon-low and targeted sequencing of tumor and matched blood were performed in all patients. ResultsAmong 41 patients with lung adenocarcinoma, the TMB was significantly higher in the radon-high group than it was in the radon-low group (mean 4.94 vs. 2.6 mutations/Mb, P = 0.01). The recurrence rates between radon-high and radon-low group did not differ significantly. Mutational signatures of radon-high tumors showed features associated with inactivity of the base excision repair and DNA replication machineries. The analysis of tumor evolutionary trajectories also suggested a series of mutagenesis induced by radon exposure. In addition, radon-high tumors revealed a significant protein-protein interaction of genes involved in DNA damage and repair (P < 0.001). ConclusionsIndoor radon exposure increased the TMB in never-smoker patients with lung adenocarcinoma and their mutational signature was associated with defective DNA mismatch repair.

The genomic imprint of cancer therapies helps timing the formation of metastases.

A retrospective determination of the time of metastasis formation is essential for a better understanding of the evolution of oligometastatic cancer. This study was based on the hypothesis that genomic alterations induced by cancer therapies could be used to determine the temporal order of the treatment and the formation of metastases. We analysed the whole genome sequence of a primary tumour sample and three metastatic sites derived from autopsy samples from a young never-smoker lung adenocarcinoma patient with an activating EGFR mutation. Mutation detection methods were refined to accurately detect and distinguish clonal and subclonal mutations. In comparison to a panel of samples from untreated smoker or never-smoker patients, we showed that the mutagenic effect of cisplatin treatment could be specifically detected from the base substitution mutations. Metastases that arose before or after chemotherapeutic treatment could be distinguished based on the allele frequency of cisplatin-induced dinucleotide mutations. In addition, genomic rearrangements and late amplification of the EGFR gene likely induced by afatinib treatment following the acquisition of a T790M gefitinib resistance mutation provided further evidence to tie the time of metastasis formation to treatment history. The established analysis pipeline for the detection of treatment-derived mutations allows the drawing of tumour evolutionary paths based on genomic data, showing that metastases may be seeded well before they become detectable by clinical imaging.

Common cancer-driver mutations and their association with abnormally methylated genes in lung adenocarcinoma from never-smokers

ObjectivesLung adenocarcinoma in never-smokers accounts for 15–20% of all lung cancer. Although targetable mutations are more prevalent in these tumors, the biological and clinical importance of coexisting and/or mutually exclusive abnormalities is just emerging. This study evaluates the relationships between common genetic and epigenetic aberrations in these tumors. Materials and methodsNext-generation sequencing was employed to screen 20 commonly mutated cancer-driver genes in 112 lung adenocarcinomas from never-smokers. The relationship of these mutations with cancer-related methylation of 59 genes, and geographical/ethnic differences in the prevalence for mutations compared to multiple East Asian never-smoker lung adenocarcinoma cohorts was studied. ResultsThe most common driver mutation detected in 40% (45/112) of the tumors was EGFR, followed by TP53 (18%), SETD2 (11%), and SMARCA4 (11%). Over 72% (81/112) of the cases have mutation of at least one driver gene. While 30% (34/112) of the tumors have co-mutations of two or more genes, 42% (47/112) have only one driver gene mutation. Differences in the prevalence for some of these mutations were seen between adenocarcinomas in East Asian versus US (mainly Caucasian) never-smokers including a significantly lower rate of EGFR mutation among the US patients. Interestingly, aberrant methylation of multiple cancer-related genes was significantly associated with EGFR wildtype tumors. Among 15 differentially methylated genes by EGFR mutation, 14 were more commonly methylated in EGFR wildtype compared to mutant tumors. These findings were independently validated using publicly available data. ConclusionMost lung adenocarcinomas from never-smokers harbor targetable mutation/co-mutations. In the absence of EGFR mutation that drives 40% of these tumors, EGFR wildtype tumors appear to develop by acquiring aberrant promoter methylation that silences tumor-suppressor genes.

PO-153 Investigating tobacco smoking differential effects on lung and bladder cancer

IntroductionCancer initiation and progression mechanisms contingent upon tobacco use are not yet comprehensively understood. In lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) increased overall mutation rate was attributed to smoking, whereas in bladder cancer (BLCA) reduced suppression of oncogenes in smokers, might have been a distinguishing factor between cancers caused in smokers and never smokers (NS).It is well established that cigarette smoking is a risk factor for BLCA. However it is also found that the risk of BLCA as well as LUAD, might be higher in women than in men when both subjects have smoked comparable amounts of cigarettes, whilst confirmed that smoking cessation reduces the risk of BLCA.Smoking is usually associated with lung cancer however, almost 25% of all lung cancer cases worldwide have been found in NS. Environmental tobacco is a relatively weak carcinogen thus it is a controversial thought to assume that LUAD in NS is due to passive exposure.Material and methodsIn our analyses we used mRNASeq expression and clinical data downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), and to perform differential gene expression analysis we used Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). We focused on signalling pathways to investigate the molecular biology of the association of TGF-β, Wnt and Notch to explain their contribution to the inter-individual variations associated with smoking status. We will investigate how these three pathways crosstalk and respond to signals from the microenvironment to regulate the expression and function of epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) inducing transcription factors in the development and physiology of both cancers.Results and discussionsOf interest our analysis in nonsmokers have showed JAG1 to be underexpressed in LUAD and overexpressed in BLCA contrary to the expression of NOTCH2. Whereas in current smokers ADAM17 as well as PSEN2 have showed underexpression in LUAD but overexpression in BLCA with NOTCH1 presenting a reverse effect.ConclusionOur approach to a pathway specific gene association analysis will help detect the accumulative effect of group of functionally related genes aiding in revealing the transcriptional program accounting for the variability in the phenotype, since cancers arise from the aberrations in multiple genes, several of which have moderate or even less than moderate effects, making them difficult to detect by individual gene analysis.This work was supported by the Medical University of Lodz grant number 503/0-078-02/503-01-004. Authors declare.

Genetic Modifiers of Progression-Free Survival in Never-Smoking Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients Treated with First-Line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with mutated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are relatively sensitive to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment and have longer progression-free survival (PFS) when treated with EGFR-TKI compared with platinum-based chemotherapy. However, many patients with advanced NSCLC who have mutated EGFR do not respond to first-line EGFR-TKI treatment and still have shorter PFS. The aim of this study was to identify genetic variants associated with PFS among patients with lung adenocarcinoma who were treated with first-line EGFR-TKIs. A genome-wide association study on PFS was performed in never-smoking women diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma and who were treated with first-line EGFR-TKIs (n = 128). Significant single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected for follow-up association analysis (n = 198) and for replication assay in another independent cohort (n = 153). We identified SNPs at 4q12 associated with PFS at genome-wide significance (P < 10-8) and with an estimated hazard ratio of more than 4. This association was also replicated in a larger but similar cohort and in an independent NSCLC cohort. Follow-up functional analyses showed that these SNPs were associated with the expression of EGFR, which encodes the TKI target, and with a nearby gene neuromedin-U, which encodes a G protein-coupled receptor ligand known to be involved in the progression of NSCLC. Considering these as possible prognostic biomarkers for the treatment of patients with late-stage lung cancer, we found that these SNPs were not associated with EGFR mutation status or with polymorphism of the Bcl2-interacting mediator of cell death gene. Genetic variants in 4q12 merit further investigation to assess their potential as pharmacogenomic predictors for and to understand the biology underlying its influence on PFS in patients treated with TKI therapy.

Lung Adenocarcinoma in Never Smokers: Problems of Primary Prevention from Aspects of Susceptible Genes and Carcinogens.

Global statistics estimate that approximately 25% of patients with lung cancer are never smokers. We suggest that genes related to susceptibility to metabolic syndrome were present among those related to susceptibility to lung adenocarcinoma (AC) in never smokers. There are many questions concerning lung AC in never smokers, which is increasing in incidence, with female predominance, good prognosis, unique genes related to susceptibility and good response to treatment with specific agents. The purpose of this review was to investigate the carcinogenesis of lung AC in never smokers focusing on genes related to susceptibility to lung AC and carcinogens, including environmental factors. In order to clarify the carcinogenesis of lung AC in never smokers, the definition of never smokers, survey of environmental tobacco smoke, the presence of the physical characteristics of metabolic syndrome, and other carcinogens should be investigated for primary prevention of lung AC.

ALK+ lung adenocarcinoma in never smokers and long-term ex-smokers: prevalence and detection by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

ALK gene rearrangements are identified in 2-5% of all non-small cell lung cancer and are more common in lifetime non-smokers with adenocarcinoma, but the prevalence of ALK rearrangements is not as well characterized in long-term ex-smokers (quit >10years prior to diagnosis). Accurate and timely diagnosis of ALK-rearranged tumors is of clinical importance given the remarkable response to targeted inhibitors. ALK gene rearrangement may be detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and abnormal expression of ALK protein may be detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC), the latter of which is faster and less expensive. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of ALK rearrangement in non-smokers and long-term ex-smokers with lung adenocarcinoma and to assess the performance of IHC for the detection of ALK+ tumors when compared to FISH. Two hundred fifty-one cases of resected lung adenocarcinoma were retrospectively reviewed, including non-smokers (n=79) or long-term ex-smokers (n=172). ALK IHC and ALK FISH were performed on each case. Four cases demonstrated ALK rearrangement by FISH (4/251; 1.6%). All cases were non-smokers (4/79; 5.1%), and all were positive for ALK by IHC. No additional cases were considered positive by IHC, and only 26 (10.4%) cases were considered equivocal using a conservative approach to interpretation, resulting in a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 89.5%. ALK rearrangement was not observed in lung adenocarcinoma arising in long-term ex-smokers, whereas it is seen in up to 5.1% of lifetime non-smokers. ALK IHC using the 5A4 antibody demonstrates high sensitivity, supporting its use as a screening test.

Molecular profile of lung adenocarcinoma in Brazilian never-smokers.

e20611Background: Lung adenocarcinoma in never-smokers (LANS) is a disease largely defined by targetable oncogenic mutations. High frequency of actionable genomic alterations has been reported in c...