Lumen-apposing Metal Stent Research Articles

HPB SO49 - EUS guided biliary drainage prior to pancreaticoduodenectomy - The Leeds experience

Abstract Background Biliary obstruction is a common manifestation of biliary tract cancer. Decompression is indicated if patients develop systemic illness due to the obstruction or to facilitate chemotherapy. Stent insertion via ERCP is the current first line decompressive technique, although in certain situations such as duodenal/ampullary obstruction, is not always feasible. When ERCP has failed, our centre has implemented using lumen apposing metallic stents (LAMS) delivered by the HOT AXIOS™ system to create a draining choledochoduodenostomy. Our aim is to report on our experience of carrying out pancreaticoduodenectomy after biliary drainage has been achieved with this technique. Method All patients who underwent biliary drainage with a LAMS and then surgical resection of a biliary tract cancer were identified from a prospective database. Both procedures were carried out at St James’s Hospital, Leeds, between June 2018 and May 2024 by expert gastroenterology and pancreatic surgical consultants. Procedural and inpatient notes were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcomes were the assessment of technical feasibility of pancreaticoduodenectomy and of perioperative complications, classified by the Clavien-Dindo (CD) system. Secondary outcomes were the safe and clinically effective (defined as >50% reduction of serum bilirubin within 7 days) application of LAMS. Results Thirteen patients were identified with a median age of 69 (51-81), twelve requiring drainage due to jaundice and one due to cholangitis. Duration to resection was median 68 days (12-377). Surgical resection was successful in all thirteen patients, in seven cases the surgeons commented on fibrosis due to the stent, with one qualifying that this was no more than a conventional biliary stent. Postoperatively five patients had no complications, one CD grade 1, five CD grade 2 and one CD grade 5. There were no significant post endoscopic complications and 10 patients demonstrated clinical effectiveness of the LAMS. Conclusion ERCP is the current first line method of drainage in malignant biliary obstruction. Technical success is reliant on unimpeded access to the bile duct. The HOT AXIOSÔ system circumvents this reliance by delivering a LAMS in a single stage forming a draining choledochoduodenostomy. Our centre’s experience suggests that it is a safe and effective method of biliary drainage which does not impede surgical resection. Additionally, it is not associated with the risk of post procedural pancreatitis. Our experience justifies further large-scale studies into this technique with consideration for its use not only when ERCP is not possible.

BS SO17 - Large Bowel Occlusion as a Manifestation of Gastric Adenocarcinoma in a Patient with Previous Gastric Bypass

Abstract Background Gastric bypass surgery has become one of the hallmarks of the treatment of obesity and metabolic syndrome. Over the last decade, an increasing number of gastric cancer cases have been reported following gastric bypass, particularly in the excluded stomach. The anatomical changes and the difficult access to the excluded stomach via endoscopy hinder the diagnosis and treatment of this cancer. Method Literature review and clinical case analysis through clinical records and exam results. Results A 59-year-old male with a history of gastric bypass 15 years prior was admitted to the emergency department with bowel occlusion. A CT scan revealed colonic obstruction due to invasion by a neoplastic/inflammatory process. Consequently, a right hemicolectomy was performed. Histopathological analysis revealed infiltration of the colonic wall by poorly cohesive gastric carcinoma cells. A follow-up CT scan confirmed a lesion in the excluded stomach. A LAMS (lumen-apposing metal stent) was placed to repermeabilize the excluded stomach, and biopsies confirmed gastric mixed adenocarcinoma. A gastroduodenal stent was placed for antropyloric stenosis. A multidisciplinary team opted for palliative chemotherapy. Conclusion The association between bariatric surgery and gastric cancer remains controversial. As described in previous studies, this clinical case demonstrates that gastric adenocarcinoma in patients who underwent gastric bypass often presents as an aggressive and advanced-stage disease. Given the mortality associated with gastric cancer and the increasing number of bariatric surgeries, this case report highlights the important need to develop patient selection protocols for gastric bypass and respective appropriate follow-up.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy for the treatment of gastric outlet obstruction secondary to acute pancreatitis.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is a minimally invasive technique for treating gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of EUS-GE in managing benign GOO caused by duodenal stenosis in patients with acute pancreatitis. This international retrospective study analyzed patients treated with EUS-GE for GOO caused by acute pancreatitis until December 2023, evaluating technical and clinical success, adverse events, and reintervention. 39 patients (median age 55 years, 15 women) were included. There was a 92.3% technical success rate, with only three patients unable to undergo EUS-GE owing to a long distance between the stomach and small bowel or an inadequate window for puncture. Clinical success was observed in 34 patients (87.2%). The median Gastric Outlet Obstruction Scoring System (GOOSS) improved from 0 before EUS-GE to 2 afterward (P <0.001). Follow-up (≥3 months) was available in 25 patients. During a median follow-up of 23 months, four patients required reintervention. It was possible to remove the lumen-apposing metal stent in 18 patients. The only adverse event was a gastrocolic fistula detected incidentally after 3 months. EUS-GE is an effective and safe method for managing benign GOO in the setting of acute pancreatitis.

Safety and Efficacy of Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents for Management of Late Refractory Gastro-jejunal Structures in Patients with Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (with Video).

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) related late gastro-jejunal (GJ) strictures are often resistant to endoscopic balloon dilations. Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) have been used to treat benign strictures with favorable results. However, the data remains limited to justify LAMS use for management of post-RYGB late GJ strictures. We aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of LAMS placement for the management of late GJ strictures that are refractory to balloon dilations in post-RYGB patients. This was a single center retrospective study that included all post-RYGB patients who underwent LAMS placement for management of late GJ strictures that had previously failed balloon dilations. Primary outcomes were technical and clinical success, and secondary outcomes were LAMS-related adverse events. A total of 28 patients underwent LAMS placement for management of GJ strictures. Median age was 60.5 (IQR 50.5, 67.0) years and majority were females (27, 96.4%). Median interval between surgery and first diagnosis of GJ stricture was 13 years (IQR 7, 17.5). 20 × 10 mm LAMS was the most used stent (n = 24, 85.7%). The median procedure time was 23.5 (IQR 14.5, 32.0) minutes. Technical and short-term clinical success of LAMS placement was 100% (95% CI 87.9-100.0). Long-term success was achieved in 19 out of 25 patients (76.0%, 95% CI 56.6-88.5) that had over 3 months follow-up after LAMS removal. Stent migration was noted in 2 (7.1%) patients, and 1 (3.6%) patient each experienced pain and minor bleeding without the need for additional interventions. No patient in our cohort required surgical revision of GJ anastomosis. Placement of LAMS is safe, technically feasible, and associated with a high clinical success rate in patients with late GJ strictures after RYGB who have failed prior balloon dilations. Placement of LAMS can be considered early in patients requiring multiple balloon dilations.

A novel puzzle ring replacement technique of a lumen-apposing metal stent with a double-pigtail plastic stent to prevent walled-off necrosis recurrence (with video).

Replacing a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) with a double-pigtail plastic stent (DPS) after treatment for walled-off necrosis contributes to the prevention of recurrence. However, the success rate is not very high. To overcome this issue, we devised a novel stent-replacement technique. In the final treatment procedure, a 7-F DPS was placed in the lumen of the LAMS. Subsequently, the walled-off necrosisshrank, and granulation formed over the pigtail portion, which fixed the DPS. The LAMS alone was removed with grasping forceps, leaving the DPS in the lumen of the LAMS (i.e., a puzzle-ring technique; direct or rotary removal technique). Between August 2021 and August 2023, 18 patients were evaluated for recurrence prevention using this novel technique (median duration of LAMS placement, 37 days). In 17 patients (94.4%), the LAMS was successfully replaced with a 7-F DPS (direct technique 14, rotary technique 3; median removal procedure time, 3 min). No recurrence was observed during the median observation period of 385 days. Before using this technique (April 2012 to August 2022), the technical success rate of replacement of LAMS with 7-F DPS was significantly lower (61.8% [42/68, p = 0.02]). Recurrence of pancreatic fluid collection occurred in 15.3% (4/26) of the patients who could not undergo replacement with a 7-F DPS. The novel puzzle ring technique, which improves the success rate of LAMS for DPS replacement, may be useful in reducing recurrence after walled-off necrosistreatment.

Lumen-apposing metal stents for anastomosis creation throughout the gastrointestinal tract: A large single-center experience.

The introduction of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) has revolutionized the field of therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LAMS in creating an endoscopic ultrasound-guided anastomosis between two segments of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Data from all consecutive LAMS procedures for anastomosis creation between two segments of the GI, conducted between October 2019 and February 2024, were retrospectively analyzed for technical success (defined as correct deployment of the LAMS in the target), clinical success (defined as achievement of the intended clinical goal), and adverse events. A total of 145 LAMS procedures were performed in 136 patients. Indications for LAMS procedures included the need for endoscopic access to or reversal of surgically excluded segments of the GI tract (n = 73, 50.3%), and the alleviation of any GI outflow obstruction (n = 72, 49.7%). The overall technical and clinical success rates were very high (97.2% and 95.2%, respectively). Adverse events were observed in 20/145 (13.8%) cases, including 11 (7.6%) minor events (AGREE <3) and nine (6.2%) major events (AGREE ≥3). Major events included stent migration (n = 1), persisting fistula (n = 3), and bleeding (n = 4). All adverse events were successfully managed, and there were no procedure-related deaths. Loss of LAMS patency occurred in 4/145 (2.8%) cases and could be endoscopically managed in all cases. The creation of anastomoses with LAMS between two segments of the GI tract appears to be effective and safe, with a low reintervention rate due to loss of LAMS patency.

EUS-guided Drainage of Pancreatic Fluid Collections Using Lumen Apposing Metal Stents With or Without Coaxial Plastic Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Co-axial plastic double pigtail stents (DPSs) are commonly placed through lumen apposing metal stents (LAMS) in patients with pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) to decrease the risk of adverse events. In this meta-analysis, we have compared the outcomes of LAMS plus co-axial DPS versus LAMS alone in patients with PFCs. We reviewed several databases to identify the studies that compared outcomes of LAMS with DPS to LAMS without DPS in the treatment of PFCs. Our outcomes of interest were overall adverse events, clinical success and individual adverse events such as stent (LAMS) migration, stent occlusion, bleeding, and infection. We calculated pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the analysis of outcomes. We used a random effects model to analyze the data. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. We included 10 studies with 685 patients. Rate of overall adverse events was significantly lower in the LAMS+DPS group compared with LAMS alone, RR (95% CI) 0.58 (0.40, 0.87). There was no significant difference in the rate of clinical success between groups, RR (95% CI) 1.03 (0.94, 1.13). We found no significant difference in rate of stent occlusion between groups. Rate of infection was significantly lower in LAMS+DPS group, RR (95% CI) 0.46 (0.24, 0.85). There was no significant difference in rate of bleeding and stent (LAMS) migration between groups. Addition of co-axial DPS to LAMS decreases the risk of adverse events in patients with PFCs and should be considered in all patients with PFCs.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage of Pelvic Fluid Collections with Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents

Introduction: A pelvic abscess is a potential life-threatening condition that should be managed conservatively whenever possible. Currently, computed tomography or ultrasound-guided percutaneous drainage is still the gold standard approach for pelvic fluid collections (PFCs) requiring intervention. More recently, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) drainage using lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) has been used off-label in PFCs with similar efficacy, a favorable safety profile, better quality of life, and generally a shorter duration of treatment when compared to the gold standard treatment. Methods: An observational retrospective analysis of 6 patients who underwent EUS-guided PFC drainage with LAMS at our institution was conducted. Records were reviewed to identify etiology, size of the collection, number of endoscopic procedures required until complete resolution, stent indwelling time, concomitant surgical or percutaneous associated procedures, successful removal and resolution. Results: The 6 patients included had an average age of 69 years old and 5 (83.3%) were male. The average size of the PFCs was 72.5 mm. All patients (100%) had successful drainage following LAMS placement, though 1 patient had an early recurrence. The mean stent indwelling time in our study was 6.7 days. An additional percutaneous or surgical drainage intervention was not required in any of the participants. Also, no adverse events related to the procedure were reported during the follow-up period. Conclusion: EUS-guided drainage of PFCs with LAMS is a safe and minimally invasive technique, which allows rapid PFC resolution, with no need for percutaneous or surgical drainage interventions.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy versus duodenal stenting for gastric outlet obstruction: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.

Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) refers to mechanical obstruction at the level of the gastric outlet and is associated with significantly impacted quality of life and mortality. Duodenal stenting (DS) offers a minimally invasive approach to managing GOO but is associated with a high risk of stent obstruction. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is a novel intervention that uses lumen-apposing metal stents to open the restricted lumen. The current evidence comparing EUS-GE to DS is limited and inconsistent. We conducted a systematic literature search on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov to retrieve studies comparing EUS-GE to DS for GOO. Odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using the DerSimonian-Laird inverse variance random-effects model. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. Ten studies with a total of 1275 GOO patients (585: EUS-GE and 690: DS) were included. EUS-GE was associated with statistically significant higher clinical success [OR: 2.52; 95% CI: 1.64, 3.86; P < .001], lower re-intervention rate [OR: 0.12; 95% CI: 0.06, 0.22; P < .00001], longer procedural time [MD: 20.91; 95% CI: 15.48, 26.35; P < .00001], and lower risk of adverse events [OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.82; P = .007] than DS. Technical success [OR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.31, 1.25] and the length of hospital stay [MD: -2.12; 95% CI: -5.23, 0.98] were comparable between the 2 groups. EUS-GE is associated with higher clinical success, longer total procedural time, lower re-intervention rate, and lower risk of adverse events than DS. Technical success and the length of hospital stay were comparable between the 2 groups. EUS-GE appears to be a safe and effective procedure for managing GOO. Further large, multicentric randomized controlled trials are warranted to investigate the safety and outcomes of EUS-GE in patients with malignant GOO.

Optimizing EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy with lumen-apposing metal stents for primary drainage of malignant distal biliary obstruction (SCORPION-IIp): a prospective pilot study

Background and AimsBiliary drainage by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP) in patients with malignant distal bile duct obstruction (MBO) is frequently associated with complications, such as pancreatitis, hampering patient outcome. EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) with a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) is a promising alternative in patients with MBO but is associated with a worrisome risk of stent dysfunction. Placement of a fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) through the LAMS, thereby changing the axis of biliary drainage towards the descending duodenum, may decrease the risk of stent dysfunction while maintaining high technical success and low adverse event rates. MethodsProspective single center pilot study in patients with a pathology confirmed MBO without gastric-outlet obstruction. Primary outcome was stent dysfunction, defined as recurrent jaundice after initial clinical success, ongoing jaundice in combination with persistent bile duct dilatation, or cholangitis. The study was registered in clinicaltrials.gov (registry number NCT05595122). ResultsOverall, 27 consecutive patients eligible for EUS-CDS were enrolled. The placement of a LAMS was successful in 24/27 patients (89%), and placement of FCSEMS through the LAMS was successful in 20/24 (83%), in the remaining 4 patients a coaxial double-pigtail plastic stent was placed. In 2 of these 20 patients there was persistent jaundice requiring stent revision (10%), leading to a clinical success rate of 90%. No patients developed stent dysfunction after initial clinical success. ConclusionsThis study showed a stent dysfunction rate of 10% following technically successful EUS-CDS with placement of a FCSEMS through the LAMS. Improving the design of LAMS may further reduce the rate of stent dysfunction.

Outcomes of lumen apposing metal stent placement in patients with surgically altered anatomy: Multicenter international experience.

Background and study aims Although outcomes of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) placement in native anatomy have been reported, data on LAMS placement in surgically altered anatomy (SAA) are sparse. We aimed to assess outcomes of LAMS placement in patients with SAA for different indications. Patients and methods This was an international, multicenter, retrospective, observational study at 25 tertiary care centers through November 2023. Consecutive patients with SAA who underwent LAMS placement were included. The primary outcome was technical success defined as correct placement of LAMS. Secondary outcomes were clinical success and safety. Results Two hundred and seventy patients (125 males; average age 61 ± 15 years) underwent LAMS placement with SAA. Procedures included EUS-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE) and EUS-directed transenteric ERCP (EDEE) (n = 82), EUS-guided entero-enterostomy (n = 81), EUS-guided biliary drainage (n = 57), EUS-guided drainage of peri-pancreatic fluid collections (n = 48), and EUS-guided pancreaticogastrostomy (n = 2). Most cases utilized AXIOS stents (n = 255) compared with SPAXUS stents (n = 15). Overall, technical success was 98%, clinical success was 97%, and the adverse event (AE) rate was 12%. Using AGREE classification, five events were rated as Grade II, 21 events as Grade IIIa, and six events as IIIb. No difference in AEs were noted among stent types ( P = 0.52). Conclusions This study shows that placement of LAMS is associated with high technical and clinical success rates in patients with SAA. However, the rate of AEs is noteworthy, and thus, these procedures should be performed by expert endoscopists at tertiary centers.

Lumen-apposing metal stents and their emerging role in therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound

The field of therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has expanded significantly in the past 2 decades, thanks in part to the invention and wide use of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS). LAMS are used as alternatives to surgical or interventional radiological procedures, and yield excellent outcomes. Initially, their use was limited to management of various types of pancreatic fluid collections, including walled-off necrosis or pseudocysts. In recent years, the indications have expanded to biliary drainage, particularly in cases of malignant bile duct obstruction. LAMS are also used in gastric outlet obstruction and to access bile duct in patients with surgically altered anatomy. This clinical review aims to briefly expand on these indications and discuss the supporting literature for use of LAMS.

S1577 Are Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents Beneficial for Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Gallbladder Drainage with Lumen Apposing Metal Stents?

S1577 Are Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents Beneficial for Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Gallbladder Drainage with Lumen Apposing Metal Stents?

S148 The Utility of Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents Combined With Coaxial Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Transluminal Drainage of Pancreatic Fluid Collections

S148 The Utility of Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents Combined With Coaxial Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Transluminal Drainage of Pancreatic Fluid Collections

Timing of lumen-apposing metal stents removal in pancreatic fluid collections: Could we go beyond?

Background and aimsLumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) are the mainstay treatment for pancreatic fluid collections (PFC). A 4-weeks interval for LAMS removal has been suggested to avoid adverse events (AEs). Primary aim is to evaluate the AEs rate in patients with LAMS removal <4 and >4 weeks from placement and possible associated factors. MethodsRetrospective study on patients underwent EUS-guided drainage of PFC with LAMS at two Italian centers between January 2017 and November 2023. PFC and LAMS features were collected. AEs were defined as bleeding, obstruction and buried LAMS. Results108 patients were enrolled (62.9 % males; mean age 61 ± 14 years old). In 38 % PFC was in pancreatic head.In 64.8 % of patients LAMS ≥15 mm was used. Mean time of LAMS indwelling was 71 ± 87 days and in 73.1 % of patients the LAMS was removed after 4 weeks. AE occurred in 8.3 % of patients and the most common (77.8 %) was bleeding.There was no association between LAMS indwelling >4 weeks (8/9 vs 65/93 p = 0.44) and the rate of AE. A comparable mean time of LAMS persistence (108 ± 96 vs 67 ± 86 p = 0.18) between patients with and without AE was observed. PFC in the head (7/9 vs 33/93 p = 0.02) and LAMS ≥15 mm (9/9 vs 58/93 p = 0.03) were associated with a higher rate of AE. ConclusionWhen needed, LAMS removal >4 weeks appears to be as safe as LAMS removal within 4 weeks. LAMS ≥15 mm and Head location were associated with higher rate of AE and thus should arouse more caution.

Biliary drainage in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction: results of an Italian consensus conference

BackgroundMalignant Distal Biliary Obstruction (MBDO) is a common event occurring along the natural history of both pancreatic cancer and cholangiocarcinoma. Epidemiological and biological features make MBDO one of the key elements of the clinical management of patients suffering for of pancreatic cancer or cholangiocarcinoma. The development of dedicated biliary lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) is changing the clinical work up of patients with MBDO. i-EUS is an Italian network of clinicians and scientists with a special interest in biliopancreatic endoscopy, EUS in particular.MethodsThe scientific methodology was chosen in line with international guidance and in a fashion similar to those applied by broader scientific associations. PICO questions were elaborated and subsequently voted by a broad panel of experts within a simplified Delphi process.Results and conclusionsThe manuscripts describes the results of a consensus conference organized by i-EUS with the aim of providing an evidence based-guidance for the appropriate use of the techniques in patients with MBDO.

Percutaneous Endoscopic Colostomy to Relieve Malignant Bowel Obstruction.

Malignant bowel obstruction due to peritoneal carcinomatosis is a common problem. When surgery is not feasible in the context of a high intraperitoneal tumour burden, other techniques are required. We report the case of a 67-year-old female with malignant obstruction of the ascending colon. Following an unsuccessful surgical attempt, decompression was successfully achieved via percutaneous endoscopic colostomy using a lumen-apposing metal stent. The patient was able to resume a full oral diet within 2 days. However, local inflammatory complications arose due to faecal contamination of the sutures. Once the sutures were removed, no further interventions were required. Percutaneous endoscopic colostomy is a safe and viable alternative for decompression in malignant bowel obstruction when surgery is not feasible. However, limitations include the risk of local infection due to sutures and its applicability only in cases with distal stenosis. Malignant bowel obstruction is a frequent challenge in palliative care.Percutaneous colostomy with a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) is a safe and effective option to relieve bowel obstruction.Percutaneous colostomy with a LAMS remains patent in the long term.

Unblocking a terminolateral anastomosis on an interposed coloplasty for caustic esophagitis: placement of a lumen-apposing metal stent to straighten the lumen

Unblocking a terminolateral anastomosis on an interposed coloplasty for caustic esophagitis: placement of a lumen-apposing metal stent to straighten the lumen

A stent of strength: use of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) for biliary pathologies and other novel applications.

A stent of strength: use of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) for biliary pathologies and other novel applications.

Lumen-apposing metal stents provide early and late clinical benefits for the management of benign gastrointestinal strictures: Is there a role for definitive therapy?

This study aimed to characterize the clinical outcomes, safety, and efficacy of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) in treating benign gastrointestinal strictures. A single-center retrospective review of all patients who underwent LAMS placement for benign strictures from June 2017 to July 2023. Primary outcomes were technical success, early clinical success, late clinical success (LCS), and sustained post-LAMS clinical success (SPLCS). Secondary outcomes included stent dwell time, stenosis changes, adverse events, reintervention rates, and symptomatology evaluation. Thirty-five patients underwent placement of 42 LAMS (74% female, mean age: 54.2 ± 11.7 years). Anastomotic strictures accounted for 64% of cases (N=27, 45% at the gastrojejunal anastomosis). The median STD was 91.0 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 55.0-132.0). Technical success was obtained in all cases. Early clinical successand LCS were achieved in 80% of cases overall. SPLCS was achieved in 45% (n=15) of cases. The overall reintervention rate was 63%, with a median time to reintervention being 50.5 days (IQR: 24-105). adverse eventsoccurred in 28% (n=12) overall, with a 24% migration rate (n=10). Follow-up was completed in 83% of cases with a median duration of 629 days (range: 192.0-1297.0). Overall symptom improvement occurred in 79% (n=27) during indwelling LAMS versus 58% and 56% at 30- and 60-days post-removal, respectively. LAMS for benign gastrointestinal strictures are associated with high technical and early clinical success/LCS rates, positive quality-of-life metrics, and a tolerable adverse event rate. Overall, recurrence of symptoms and high reintervention rates post-LAMS removal reinforce the difficulty in managing benign gastrointestinal strictures but also argue for LAMS as a definitive therapy in select cases.