Alignment Of Lumbar Spine Research Articles

Gender differences in spinal mobility during postural changes: a detailed analysis using upright CT

Lumbar spinal alignment is crucial for spine biomechanics and is linked to various spinal pathologies. However, limited research has explored gender-specific differences using CT scans. The objective was to evaluate and compare lumbar spinal alignment between standing and sitting CT in healthy individuals, focusing on gender differences. 24 young and 25 elderly males (M) and females (F) underwent standing and sitting CT scans to assess lumbar spinal alignment. Parameters measured and compared between genders included lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), lordotic angle (LA), foraminal height (FH), and bony boundary area (BBA). Females showed significantly larger changes in SS and PT when transitioning from standing to sitting (p = .044, p = .038). A notable gender difference was also observed in the L4-S LA among the elderly, with females showing a significantly larger decrease in lordotic angle compared to males (− 14.1° vs. − 9.2°, p = .039*). Females consistently exhibited larger FH and BBA values, particularly in lower lumbar segments, which was more prominent in the elderly group (M vs. F: L4/5 BBA 80.1 mm2 [46.3, 97.8] vs. 109.7 mm2 [74.4, 121.3], p = .019 in sitting). These findings underline distinct gender-related variations in lumbar alignment and flexibility, with a focus on noteworthy changes in BBA and FH in females. Gender differences in lumbar spinal alignment were evident, with females displaying greater pelvic and sacral mobility. Considering gender-specific characteristics is crucial for assessing spinal alignment and understanding spinal pathologies. These findings contribute to our understanding of lumbar spinal alignment and have implications for gender-specific spinal conditions and treatments.

A multi-dimensional assessment of internet gaming disorder in children and adolescents: A case-control study.

Internet gaming disorder (IGD) leads to social disturbances and isolation, neglect of daily responsibilities, behavioral disorders, and physical impairments. This study aimed to investigate the effect of IGD on spine biomechanics, range of motion in the neck and low back, and lung functions and respiratory muscle strength in children and adolescents. Sixty-four children and adolescents with IGD (Group I) and 41 healthy controls (Group II) were included in the study. The outcomes were assessed with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Internet Addiction Scale, active range of motion (AROM) in the neck and lumbar spine, posture and spinal alignment, lung function tests, and respiratory muscle strength. There is a significant difference in pain intensity at rest, during activity, and daily sitting time between groups (p < 0.05). Craniovertebral angle, shoulder asymmetry, thoracic kyphosis angle, cervical extension and rotation, and right lumbar rotation significantly decreased in Group I than in Group II (p < 0.05). Besides, the PEF, FEF 25-75%, and respiratory muscle strength were lower in Group I than in Group II (p < 0.05). With a multiple linear regression model, MEP, FEV1, and weekly time spent playing online games were significant predictors of internet addiction intensity (R2 = 0.28; p = 0.02, p = 0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively). Postural misalignment and increased sedentary time cause physical health deterioration and negatively affect lung functions in children and adolescents with IGD. Consequently, considering both psychological and physical health is necessary to assess the problematic nature of internet gaming. A comprehensive assessment and multidisciplinary team approach is essential to managing the IGD.

Correlation Between Direction of Prolapsed Intervertebral Disc (PIVD) And Lumbar Vertebral Alignment

Abstract Purpose: The purpose of this research was to establish a link between direction of a prolapsed intervertebral disc (PIVD) and lumbar vertebral alignment. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 102 participants with prolapsed intervertebral discs in the lumbar segment and lumbar vertebral mal-alignment of both sexes between the ages of 30 and 50 who had undergone MRI and X-ray for the lumbo-sacral spine. The Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) was used to assess outcome, MRI scans were used to determine the direction and amount of PIVD, and lumbar spinal alignment was assessed using X-rays in the AP and lateral views. SPSS version 26.0 was used for statistical analysis. Findings: Among the 102 participants, The study found that only 2.94% of 102 participants had Prolapsed Intracranial Disc Disease (PID) at the L1-2 level, with many on multiple levels. Prolapsed intervertebral discs were prevalent in 46.07% of individuals, with scoliosis in 33.33%, exaggerated lumbar lordosis in 4 subjects, and anterolisthesis in 20.59%. The study found a significant correlation between posterocentral and anterolisthesis, biforaminal and flatback, right paracentral and left paracentral prolapse and scoliosis (p&amp;lt;0.0001), with biforaminal direction being particularly significant for anterolisthesis and retrolisthesis (p=0.0050, 0.0014). The lumbosacral angle had a mean value of 31.79, and the mean of pain on rest was 1.99±1.38 and during activity was 5.51±1.66. Conclusion: It concluded that there was a significant relationship between the direction of prolapsed intervertebral disc (PIVD) and lumbar vertebral alignment.

Lumbar offset distance: A simplified metric for evaluation of the lumbar spine alignment.

A healthy lower back is essential for optimal spinal function and overall wellness. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become the gold standard in assessing lumbar spine disease. This article aims to evaluate the precision and efficacy of the lumbar offset distance (LOD) as a novel MRI parameter designed to determine the lumbar spine alignment. normally measured as we compared it to a new parameter based on length. Supine sagittal magnetic resonance images of 101 patients who underwent lumbar spine MRI scans were analyzed. We focused on L1-L5 lumbar lordosis angle (LLA) and LOD to assess lumbar spine alignment. Diagnostic cutoff values for LOD measurements were determined, and their diagnostic accuracies were evaluated. The normal LLA in our dataset was 23°-45°, and the normal LOD was 5-15 mm. Using linear regression, the range of 6-14 mm correlates to the LLA range of 20°-45°, which would define the standard lumbar offset as normal between 6 and 14 mm. Hence, lumbar hypolordosis was defined as <6 mm, and lumbar hyperlordosis was defined as more than 14 mm. Our study showed a good correlation between the LOD and LLA and is particularly useful in identifying cases of normal lumbar lordosis, hypolordosis, and hyperlordosis. Linear measurements show good diagnostic accuracy of LOD in evaluating lumbar spinal alignment, including normal alignment, hypolordosis, and hyperlordosis.

Effect of a mattress on lumbar spine alignment in supine position in healthy subjects: an MRI study

BackgroundHumans should sleep for about a third of their lifetime and the choice of the mattress is very important from a quality-of-life perspective. Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to assess the changes of lumbar angles, evaluated in a supine position using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), on a mattress versus a rigid surface.MethodsTwenty healthy subjects (10 females, 10 males), aged 32.3 ± 6.5 (mean ± standard deviation), with body mass index 22.4 ± 2.9, completed three evaluations: (i) spine MRI in supine position on a mattress (MAT); (ii) spine MRI in supine position on rigid surface (CON); and (iii) biplanar radiographic imaging in standing position. The following indexes were calculated for both MAT and CON: lumbar lordosis angles L1–L5, L1–S1, L5–S1, and the sacral slope (SS). Further, pelvic incidence (PI) was calculated from the biplanar radiographic images.ResultsMain findings were (i) L1–L5 and SS were greater in MAT than CON (L1:L5: +2.9°; SS: +2.0°); (ii) L5–S1 was lower in MAT than CON (−1.6°); (iii) L1–S1 was greater in MAT than CON only for male subjects (+2.0°); (iv) significant and positive correlations between PI and L1–L5, L1–S1 and SS were observed in both CON and MAT.ConclusionsThe use of a mattress determined small but statistically significant changes in lumbar angles.Relevance statementThe use of a mattress determines small but statistically significant changes in radiological angles describing the sagittal alignment of the lumbar spine when lying in the supine position.Key points• Lordosis angle L1–L5 was greater in MAT than in CON condition (+2.9°).• Sacral slope was greater in MAT than in CON condition (+2.0°).• Lordosis angle L5–S1 was lower in MAT than in CON condition (−1.6°).Graphical

Thoracolumbar and Lumbopelvic Spinal Alignment During the Barbell Back Squat: A Comparison Between Men and Women.

Maintaining neutral spinal alignment is considered important when performing the barbell back squat exercise. Since male and female lifters may differ in injury location it is important to examine whether they differ in spinal alignment during the back squat. The study aimed to quantify the spinal alignment in the upper and lower lumbar spine during the barbell back squat exercise in male and female lifters. Secondary aims were to compare alignment during the back squat to standing habitual lumbar spine alignment and determine whether male and female lifters differ in these aspects. Observational, Cross-sectional. Competitive power- and weightlifters were recruited and performed three repetitions of the barbell back squat exercise using a load equivalent to 70% of their one-repetition maximum. Spinal alignment and range of motion were measured using inertial measurement units placed on the thoracic, lumbar and sacral spine. Data was presented descriptively and comparisons between men and women as well as spinal alignment in four different positions were done with a factorial repeated measures analysis of variance. Twenty-three (14 males, 9 females) were included. During execution of the squat, spinal alignment adjustments in the lumbar spine were made in all three planes of movement, compared to the start position, in both male and female lifters. Compared to their standing habitual posture, all lifters adjusted their upper lumbar spine to a less lordotic position when in the start position of the back squat (standing upright with the barbell on their back). Only male lifters assumed a less lordotic alignment in their lower lumbar spine in the start position compared their habitual posture. Adjustments of spinal alignment, predominantly in the sagittal plane, are made during execution of the back squat in both male and female lifters. Further, lifters adopt a less lordotic alignment with a heavy barbell on their upper back, more so in male than female lifters. In conclusion, it seems that spinal alignment changes noticeably during the barbell back squat. 3©The Author(s).

Morphological description of sagittal lumbar spinal alignment using curve magnitude, span, and apex—the multiethnic alignment normative study (MEANS)

Current definition of lumbar lordosis uses the L1-S1 angle. Prevailing classification of sagittal spinal morphology, derived from a young adult population, classifies the spine into four subtypes defined by their sacral slope (SS) and curve morphology. To describe physiological sagittal alignment of the lumbar spine across age groups using three main parameters that dictate the lumbar curve: angular magnitude, span, and apex. A large, multicenter, cross-sectional radiographic comparison study. Four hundred sixty-eight healthy, asymptomatic subjects aged 18 to 80 years from five countries (184 males, 284 females; 98 France, 119 Japan, 79 Singapore, 80 Tunisia, 92 USA, mean age 40.61±14.99 years). Sagittal lumbar profile subtypes clustered based on lumbar curve angular magnitude (ie, Cobb angle of the lumbar lordosis), span, and apex, and described by sagittal radiographic parameters. Subjects underwent whole-body low-dose EOS stereoradiographs. Comparisons between conventional L1-S1 lumbar lordosis (cLL) and true lumbar lordosis (tLL, defined by the inflection-S1 angle) were conducted. Using the K-means clustering algorithm, lumbar curve angular magnitude, span and apex were used to classify sagittal spinal morphology into subtypes, stratified across age groups. Further univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to compare radiographic parameters across subtypes, and identify predictors for the lumbar curve's angular magnitude, span and apex. Mean cLL was -57.27±11.37°, and tLL was -62.62±10.76°. Using tLL, instead of cLL, to describe sagittal spinal morphology, we found significant differences in terms of angular magnitude of the lumbar curve, the median thoracolumbar inflection vertebral level and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch Multivariate analysis found a larger SS, more positive T9 tilt, and more kyphotic T4-T12 predictive for a more lordotic tLL, while a larger overhang distance predicted for a less lordotic tLL (p-values<.001). In addition, a larger T9 tilt, less lordotic L1-L5 and smaller PT were predictors of a more caudal thoracolumbar inflection and lumbar apical vertebral levels (p-values<.001). Sagittal lumbar profiles of subjects age<30 years, 30≤age<60 years and age≥60 years, could be classified into 4, 6, and 3 subtypes, respectively. Sagittal lumbar profile subtypes vary across age groups, with more homogenous morphologies at the extremes of ages. Improved understanding of the morphological evolution of sagittal spinal profiles with age in asymptomatic individuals will help guide future individualized surgical treatment.

Preoperative Association Between Quantitative Lumbar Muscle Parameters and Spinal Sagittal Alignment in Lumbar Fusion Patients.

A retrospective cross-sectional study. To assess the association between spinal muscle morphology and spinopelvic parameters in lumbar fusion patients, with a special emphasis on lumbar lordosis (LL). Maintenance of sagittal alignment relies on muscle forces, but the basic association between spinal muscles and spinopelvic parameters is poorly understood. Patients operated between 2014 and 2017 who had both lumbar magnetic resonance imaging scan and standing whole-spine radiographs within six months before surgery were included. Muscle measurements were conducted on axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance images at the superior endplate L3-L5 for the psoas and L3-S1 for combined multifidus and erector spinae (paraspinal) muscles. A pixel intensity threshold method was used to calculate the total cross-sectional area (TCSA) and the functional cross-sectional area (FCSA). Spinopelvic parameters were measured on lateral standing whole-spine radiographs and included LL, pelvic incidence (PI), PI-LL mismatch, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, thoracic kyphosis, and sagittal vertical axis. Analyses were stratified by biological sex. Multivariable linear regression analyses with adjustments for age and body mass index (BMI) were performed. A total of 104 patients (62.5% female) were included in the analysis. The patient population was 90.4% White with a median age at surgery of 69 years and a median BMI of 27.8kg/m 2 . All muscle measurements were significantly smaller in women. PI, pelvic tilt, and thoracic kyphosis were significantly greater in women. PI-LL mismatch was 6.1° (10.6°) in men and 10.2° (13.5°) in women ( P =0.106), and sagittal vertical axis was 45.3 (40.8)mm in men and 35.7 (40.8)mm in women ( P =0.251). After adjusting for age and BMI, paraspinal TCSA at L3-L5, and paraspinal FCSA at L4 showed significant positive associations with LL in women. In men, psoas TCSA at L5 and psoas FCSA at L5 showed significant negative associations with LL, but none of the paraspinal muscle measurements. Our findings indicate that psoas and lumbar spine extensor muscles interact differently on LL among men and women, creating a unique mechanical environment. Level 4.

Thoracolumbar And Lumbopelvic Spinal Alignment During The Deadlift Exercise: A Comparison Between Men And Women.

BackgroundA neutral spinal alignment is considered important during the execution of the deadlift exercise to decrease the risk of injury. Since male and female powerlifters experience pain in different parts of their backs, it is important to examine whether men and women differ in spinal alignment during the deadlift.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to quantify the spinal alignment in the upper (thoracolumbar, T11-L2) and lower (lumbopelvic, L2-S2) lumbar spine during the deadlift exercise in male and female lifters. Secondary aims were to compare lumbar spine alignment during the deadlift to standing habitual posture, and determine whether male and female lifters differ in these aspects.Study DesignObservational, Cross-sectional.MethodsTwenty-four (14 men, 10 women) lifters performed three repetitions of the deadlift exercise using 70% of their respective one-repetition maximum. Spinal alignment and spinal range of motion were measured using three inertial measurement units placed on the thoracic, lumbar and sacral spine. Data from three different positions were analyzed; habitual posture in standing, and start and stop positions of the deadlift, i.e. bottom and finish position respectively.ResultsDuring the deadlift, spinal adjustments were evident in all three planes of movement. From standing habitual posture to the start position the lumbar lordosis decreased 13° in the upper and 20° in the lower lumbar spine. From start position to stop position the total range of motion in the sagittal plane was 11° in the upper and 22° in the lower lumbar spine. The decreased lumbar lordosis from standing habitual posture to the start position was significantly greater among men.ConclusionsMen and women adjust their spinal alignment in all three planes of movement when performing a deadlift and men seem to make greater adjustments from their standing habitual posture to start position in the sagittal plane.Level of Evidence3

Age and Gender Based Spinopelvic and Regional Spinal Alignment in Asymptomatic Adult Volunteers: Results of the Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS).

Spinal alignment can have a significant impact on a patient's overall quality of life. Predicting the ideal sagittal spinal alignment of a specific individual is still a difficult task. The Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS) investigated skeletal alignment, including the spine and lower extremities, of the largest multi-ethnic cohort of asymptomatic adult volunteers. In this analysis, the authors aim to assess normative values of spinopelvic parameters and the regional cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spinal alignment in asymptomatic volunteers stratified by age and sex. Asymptomatic volunteers between ages 18 and 80 years were enrolled prospectively from centers in France, Japan, Singapore, Tunisia, and the United States. Volunteers included reported no significant neck or back pain (Visual Analog Scale ≤2), nor any known spinal disorder(s). All volunteers underwent a standing full-body or full-spine low-dose stereoradiograph. MEANS consisted of 468 volunteers with a mean age of 40.4±14.8 years. Mean cervical lordosis from C2 to C7 was -0.4±12.7°. The T1-slope averaged 23.0±7.9° and showed strong correlation ( r =0.87) with the C7-slope mean of 19.8±8.6°. Thoracic kyphosis (TK) from T4 to T12 showed a mean of 37.4±10.9°. Average L1-S1 lumbar lordosis (LL) was -57.4±11.3°. The mean pelvic incidence (PI) measured 52.0±10.7° and pelvic tilt was 12.5±7.3°. Sacral slope averaged 39.5±8.2°. The average PI-LL was -5.4±10.7°. Approximately 60% of volunteers met the PI-LL criteria within ±10°, 8.3% were ≥10°, while 32.1% were ≤-10°. LL showed moderate correlation with PI ( r =0.53) and TK ( r =0.50), while there was no correlation between TK and PI. Multiple linear regression including PI, TK, and age resulted in the following equation LL=14.6+0.57 (PI)+0.57 (TK)-0.2 (age) ( r =0.75). LL did not change with increasing age in asymptomatic volunteers. However, TK did increase with age leading to an increase in T1-slope and a compensatory increase in cervical lordosis. TK did not correlate with PI and was an independent variable in the prediction of LL. Level II-prospective cohort study.

Comparison of Spinal Alignment between XLIF, TLIF, PLIF, and PLF in the Treatment of Single Level Spondylolisthesis: A Retrospective Study

Background: Most lumbar spinal fusion procedures are performed to increase fusion potential, correct a deformity, and decompress spinal nerve roots. Nowadays, there are several spinal fusion techniques such as extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion (XLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), and posterolateral fusion (PLF). However, there are no studies directly comparing their capacity to alter lumbar lordosis, segmental lordosis, intervertebral disc height, foraminal height, and the grade of slip for treating single level spondylolisthesis in Thailand. Objective: To compare which lumbar interbody technique amongst XLIF, TLIF, PLIF, and PLF, is the most effective in restoring spinal alignment in cases such as lumbar lordosis, increased segmental lordosis, increased intervertebral disc height, increased foraminal height, and a reduced slip grade in spondylolisthesis patients. Materials and Methods: The medical records and radiographs of single level spondylolisthesis patients treated in Siriraj hospital between 2002 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical data and radiographic parameters such as lumbar lordosis, segmental lordosis, intervertebral disc height, foraminal height, and grade of slip, including preoperative and postoperative data were collected and analyzed. An inter-observer/ intra-observer reliability test for all parameters was also performed. Results: Two hundred forty patients including 192 females and 48 males with a mean age of 60.1 years were included in the present study. There was no statistically significant difference in demographic data except in younger patients in the PLF group and those with shorter length of stays in the XLIF group. The present study results indicated that there was a statistically significant increase in lumbar lordosis, increased foraminal height, and decreased slip grade in the XLIF group when compared to other three groups as TLIF, PLIF, and PLF. Conclusion: All spinal fusion techniques could improve lumbar spinal alignment, however, XLIF is superior to other procedures, especially in lumbar lordosis, foraminal height restoration, and slip grade. Keywords: Lumbar spondylolisthesis; Extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; Posterior lumbar interbody fusion; Posterolateral fusion; Lumbar lordosis

Opportunistic use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to evaluate lumbar scoliosis.

Osteoporosis and scoliosis are interrelated disease processes. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), used to assess bone density, can also be used to evaluate spinal deformity since it captures a posteroanterior (PA) image of the lumbar spine. We assessed the use of DXA to evaluate lumbar spine alignment. A lumbar spine DXA phantom was used to assess the effects of axial and sagittal plane rotation on lumbar bone mineral content (BMC), density (BMD), and L1-L4 Cobb angle measurements. Using two subject cohorts, intra- and inter-observer reliability and validity of using DXA for L1-L4 Cobb angle measurements in the coronal and sagittal planes were assessed. Axial and sagittal plane rotation greater than 15° and 10°, respectively, significantly reduced measured BMD and BMC; there was minimal effect on Cobb angle measurement reliability. In human subjects, excellent intra- and inter-observer reliability was observed using lumbar PA DXA images for Cobb angle measurements. Agreement between Cobb angles derived from lumbar PA DXA images and AP lumbar radiographs ranged from good to excellent. The mean difference in Cobb angles between supine lumbar PA DXA images and upright AP lumbar radiographs was 2.8° in all subjects and 5.8° in those with scoliosis. Lumbar spine rotation does not significantly affect BMD and BMC within 15° and 10° of axial and sagittal plane rotation, respectively, and minimally affects Cobb angle measurement. Spine alignment in the coronal plane can be reliably assessed using lumbar PA DXA images.

Consistent differences in lumbar spine alignment between low back pain subgroups and genders during clinical and functional activity sitting tests

BackgroundSubgroups of people with low back pain display differences in their lumbar alignment during tests from a clinical examination. However, it is unknown if subgroups display the same patterns during a functional activity test and if gender influences subgroup-related differences. ObjectivesTest if differences in lumbar alignment between two LBP subgroups are 1) present during a functional activity test of preferred sitting and 2) independent of gender. DesignCross-sectional. Method154 participants with chronic low back pain were classified based on the Movement System Impairment Classification System by a physical therapist. Participants performed a functional activity test of preferred sitting and clinical tests of maximum flexed and extended sitting. 3D marker co-ordinate data were collected. Sagittal plane lumbar alignment, indexed by lumbar curvature angle, was calculated. A three-way mixed effect analysis of variance was used to examine effects of test, subgroup, gender, subgroup × test, gender × test and subgroup × gender. Results/findingsThe lumbar rotation with extension subgroup [LCA = −8.0° (−9.5,-6.5)] displayed a more extended lumbar alignment than lumbar rotation [LCA = −5.9° (−7.4,-4.4)]. Women [LCA = −10.7° (−12.3,-9.2)] displayed a more extended lumbar alignment than men [LCA = −3.2° (−4.7,-1.7)]. There was a significant gender × test interaction (p = 0.01). The subgroup × test (p = 0.99) and subgroup × gender (p = 0.76) interactions were not significant. ConclusionsLBP subgroup differences in lumbar alignment are present during preferred sitting. Gender-related differences in lumbar alignment are not driving subgroup differences. These findings highlight the need to use patient-specific clinical characteristics to guide treatment of a functional activity of preferred sitting limited due to low back pain.

4188 Consistent Differences in Lumbar Spine Alignment Between Low Back Pain Subgroups and Sexes during Clinical and Functional Sitting Tests

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Test the validity of a system for subgrouping people with CLBP by comparing lumbar spine alignment in two CLBP subgroups and sexes during clinical tests of maximum flexed and extended sitting and a functional test of preferred sitting. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Using the Movement System Impairment classification system, 154 participants with CLBP were subgrouped based on the predominant direction of altered movement and alignment patterns and symptoms during a standardized examination. Participants performed a functional test of preferred sitting followed by clinical tests of maximum flexed and extended sitting in random order. Reflective markers were place superficial to T12, L3 and S1 spinous processes. 3D marker co-ordinate data were collected using an 8 camera motion capture system. Sagittal plane lumbar curvature angle (LCA), defined as the angular distance between T12, L3, and S1 landmarks was calculated for each test. A three-way mixed effect ANOVA model was used to examine the following effects: test, subgroup, sex, test*subgroup, test*sex, subgroup*sex. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Test: Lumbar alignment patterns were different for flexed [LCA = 7.4° (6.1, 8.7)], extended [LCA = −22.6° (−23.9,−21.3)], and preferred [LCA = −3.8° (−5.2,−2.5)] sitting tests. LBP subgroup: Rotation-extension [LCA = −7.5° (−8.7,−6.3)] had more extended lumbar alignment than rotation [LCA = −5.2° (−6.2,−4.2)]. Sex: Women had more extended lumbar alignment [LCA = −10.3° (−11.2,−9.3)] than men [LCA = −2.5° (−3.7,−1.2)]. Test*sex: The difference in lumbar alignment between women and men was smaller during the flexed sitting test [women = 4.2° (2.5, 5.9), men = 9.9° (7.8, 12.1)], compared to extended [women = −27.5° (−29.2, −25.8), men = −17.0° (−9.2, −14.8)] and preferred [women = −7.4° (−9.1, −5.8), men = −0.3° (−2.5, 1.8)]. The test*subgroup (p = 0.84) and subgroup*sex (p = 0.87) interactions were not significant.

In vivo hip and lumbar spine implant loads during activities in forward bent postures

Long-term measurements on the lumbar spinal alignment during daily life revealed that humans spent 90% of the day in a forward bent posture. Compared to standing, this posture leads to a substantial increase in spinal loading. The lumbar spine and pelvis, however, contribute differently to the total amount of flexion, which could possibly indicate a different timing of maximum loads in both structures during flexion. This study aimed to evaluate the in vivo implant forces in the hip and lumbar spine during activities in forward bent postures.This work utilized data collected in earlier in vivo measurements on patients either with telemeterized hip endoprostheses (HE) or vertebral body replacements (VBR). The following activities were investigated: standing, upper body flexion with and without weights in the hands using different lifting techniques (straight and bent knees).The maximum resultant forces in VBR were considerably lower than in HE. Increases in flexion inclinations caused direct increases of the resultant forces within VBR, followed by a plateau or even a decrease of the force until maximum inclination. The resultant force in HE displayed an almost continuous increase until the maximum inclination. This general curve behavior resulted in different HE-VBR load ratios, which were affected by lifting additional weights or different lifting techniques.The results emphasize that maximum loads in the spine, in contrast to the hip, do not necessarily occur at maximum upper body flexion as normally expected, rather already at intermediate flexion angles in VBR patients. The results form the basis for more detailed insilico analyzes.

Variability of lumbar spinal alignment among power- and weightlifters during the deadlift and barbell back squat

ABSTRACT The aims of the study were to evaluate the relative and absolute variability of upper (T11-L2) and lower (L2-S2) lumbar spinal alignment in power- and weightlifters during the deadlift and back squat exercises, and to compare this alignment between the two lifting groups. Twenty-four competitive powerlifters (n = 14) and weightlifters (n = 10) performed three repetitions of the deadlift and the back squat exercises using a load equivalent to 70% of their respective one-repetition maximum. The main outcome measures were the three-dimensional lumbar spinal alignment for start position, minimum and maximum angle of their spinal alignment, and range of motion measured using inertial measurement units. Relative intra-trial reliability was calculated using the two-way random model intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and absolute reliability with minimal detectable change (MDC). The ICC ranged between 0.69 and 0.99 and the MDC between 1°-8° for the deadlift. Corresponding figures for the squat were 0.78–0.99 and 1°-6°. In all participants during both exercises, spinal adjustments were made in both thoracolumbar and lumbopelvic areas in all three dimensions. In conclusion, when performing three repetitions of the deadlift and the squat, lumbar spinal alignment of the lifters did not change much between repetitions and did not differ significantly between power- and weightlifters.

Correlation of Body Mass Index with Pelvis and Lumbar Spine Alignment in Sagittal Plane in Hemophilia Patients

Introduction: Concern about weight gain among people has been high due to negative health consequences in addition to the increasing prevalence of the problem. Overweight and obesity also occur in patients with hemophilia. Analysis of literature shows that increased body weight might have a biomechanical effect on the spatial orientation of the pelvis and the lumbar spine. The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between body mass index (BMI) and the parameters characterizing the alignment of the sacrum (SS, sacral slope), the pelvis (PT, pelvic tilt; PI, pelvic incidence) and the angle value of lumbar lordosis (LL, lumbar lordosis) assessed in the sagittal plane among patients with hemophilia. Materials and methods: A total of 49 patients were subjected to the study, 23 of whom met the inclusion criteria. Body weight and height were measured. Measurement of the angle values of indicators characterizing the position of the lumbar–pelvic complex was established based on X-ray imaging analysis. Results: Analysis of the correlation between the BMI and sacral, pelvic, and lumbar indicators evaluated in the sagittal plane in the study group of patients with hemophilia showed a correlation between BMI and SS (r = 0.48). SS values were significantly and positively related to PI (r = 0.6; p = 0.002) and LL (r = 0.46; p = 0.02). The results obtained indicate the BMI relationship with the setting of the sacrum in the sagittal plane (SS). After adjusting for the knee flexion contracture, the correlation on the border of significance (b = 0.73, p = 0.07) between the body mass index and the spatial orientation of the pelvis and the spine was revealed. Conclusion: We hypothesize that increased body weight among people with hemophilia might have an effect on the positioning of the lumbosacral region. Therefore, it is believed that preventing obesity among people with hemophilia can contribute to a smaller number of intra-articular hemorrhages and better orthopedic condition of the limb joints, and thus could avoid changes in the lumbosacral region as well as their consequences.

Effect of thoracic and pelvic anteroposterior diameters on spinal sagittal alignment.

This study aimed to analyze the effect of the thoracic anteroposterior diameter (TAPD) and pelvic anteroposterior diameter (PAPD) on global sagittal alignment in asymptomatic patients with normal sagittal alignment. The study investigated 2042 adult patients who initially presented at our hospital with a hip and knee problem without history of symptoms related to the entire spine. Only 57 patients with normal global sagittal alignment (C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and C7-S1 SVA of <10 mm) were considered. The whole-spine standing lateral radiographs were obtained to analyze the following parameters: pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic inlet angle (TIA), T1 slope, cervical spinal parameters (angle of C0-2, C2-7, and C0-7), TAPD, and PAPD. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson correlation coefficients and multiple regression analyses. All the parameters showed a normal distribution. TAPD had a significant relationship with thoracic kyphosis (TK; r = 0.458), TIA (r = 0.677), and C0-2 angle (r = 0.294) but no significant relationship with T1 slope and other cervical parameters. PAPD had a significant relationship with PI (r = 0.309) and PT (r = 0.463) but no significant relationship with LL, SS, and TK. The multiple regression analysis showed that TIA = 21.974 + 0.405 (TK) + 0.188 (TAPD) (p < 0.0001). TAPD and PAPD are associated with TIA, TK, C0-2 angle, PI, and PT, all of which act as key factors in spinal sagittal alignment. Although they did not directly correlate with other cervical parameters, T1 slope, and LL, TAPD and PAPD might have indirect effects on cervical and lumbar spinal sagittal alignment through their relationships with TIA, TK, and PI.

Effects of standing on lumbar spine alignment and intervertebral disc geometry in young, healthy individuals determined by positional magnetic resonance imaging

BackgroundMost diagnostic imaging of the spine is performed in supine, a relatively unloaded position. Although the spine is subjected to functional loading that changes the spinal alignment and intervertebral disc geometry, little data exists on how healthy spines adapt to standing. This study seeks to quantify the changes of the lumbar spine from supine to standing in young, back-healthy individuals using a positional magnetic resonance imaging system. MethodsThis is an observational study that examined the changes in the lumbar spine alignment and intervertebral disc geometry between supine and standing of forty participants (19 males/21 females) without a history of low back pain. The regional lumbar spinal alignment was measured by the sagittal Cobb angle. Segmental intervertebral disc measurements included the segmental Cobb angle, anterior-to-posterior height ratio, and intervertebral disc width measured at L1/L2 - L5/S1 levels. Intra-class correlation was performed for intra- and inter-observer measurements. FindingsThe intra-observer intra-class correlation consistency model ranged from 0.76 to 0.98 with the inter-observer correlation ranging from 0.68 to 0.99. The Cobb angle decreased in standing. The L5/S1 segmental Cobb angle decreased in standing. The L2/L3 and L3/L4 anterior-to-posterior height ratios increased and the L5/S1 anterior-to-posterior height ratio decreased in standing. No difference in intervertebral disc widths was observed from supine to standing. InterpretationsWe established normative data for a back-healthy population, using a positional magnetic resonance imaging system, that could inform future investigations that examine the standing-induced adaptations of the lumbar spine in individuals with spinal or intervertebral disc pathologies.

Immediate Effects of The Deep Trunk Muscle Training on Lumbar Spine Alignment During Swimming

Immediate Effects of The Deep Trunk Muscle Training on Lumbar Spine Alignment During Swimming