Lumbar Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Research Articles

Importance of the lumbar paraspinal muscles on the maintenance of global sagittal alignment after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy.

There are limited data about the influence of the lumbar paraspinal muscles on the maintenance of sagittal alignment after pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) and the risk factors for sagittal realignment failure. The authors aimed to investigate the influence of preoperative lumbar paraspinal muscle quality on the postoperative maintenance of sagittal alignment after lumbar PSO. Patients who underwent lumbar PSO with preoperative lumbar MRI and pre- and postoperative whole-spine radiography in the standing position were included. Spinopelvic measurements included pelvic incidence, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, L1-S1 lordosis, T4-12 thoracic kyphosis, spinosacral angle, C7-S1 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 pelvic angle, and mismatch between pelvic incidence and L1-S1 lordosis. Validated custom software was used to calculate the percent fat infiltration (FI) of the psoas major, as well as the erector spinae and multifidus (MF). A multivariable linear mixed model was applied to further examine the association between MF FI and the postoperative progression of SVA over time, accounting for repeated measures over time that were adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and length of follow-up. Seventy-seven patients were recruited. The authors' results demonstrated significant correlations between MF FI and the maintenance of corrected sagittal alignment after PSO. After adjustment for the aforementioned parameters, the model showed that the MF FI was significantly associated with the postoperative progression of positive SVA over time. A 1% increase from the preoperatively assessed total MF FI was correlated with an increase of 0.92 mm in SVA postoperatively (95% CI 0.42-1.41, p < 0.0001). This study included a large patient cohort with midterm follow-up after PSO and emphasized the importance of the lumbar paraspinal muscles in the maintenance of sagittal alignment correction. Surgeons should assess the quality of the MF preoperatively in patients undergoing PSO to identify patients with severe FI, as they may be at higher risk for sagittal decompensation.

Predicting Complications in 153 Lumbar Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomies by a Single Surgeon Over a 6-Year Period.

Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is a complex surgical procedure that provides correction of moderate sagittal imbalance. Surgical complications have adverse effects on patient outcomes and healthcare costs, making it imperative for clinical researchers to focus on minimizing complications. However, when it comes to risk modeling of PSO surgery, there is currently no consensus on which patient characteristics or measures should be used. This study aimed to describe complications and compare the performance of various sociodemographic characteristics, surgical variables, and established risk indices in predicting postoperative complications, infections, and readmissions after lumbar PSO surgeries. A review was conducted on 191 patients who underwent PSO surgery at a single institution by a single fellowship-trained orthopaedic spine surgeon between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative data within 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years of the index procedure were evaluated. Descriptive statistics, t -test, chi-squared analysis, and logistic regression models were used. Intraoperative complications were significantly associated with coronary artery disease (odds ratios [OR] 3.95, P = 0.03) and operating room time (OR 1.01, P = 0.006). 30-day complications were significantly cardiovascular disease (OR 2.68, P = 0.04) and levels fused (OR 1.10, P = 0.04). 2-year complications were significantly associated with cardiovascular disease (OR 2.85, P = 0.02). 30-day readmissions were significantly associated with sex (4.47, 0.04) and length of hospital stay (χ 2 = 0.07, P = 0.04). 2-year readmissions were significantly associated with age (χ 2 = 0.50, P = 0.03), hypertension (χ 2 = 4.64, P = 0.03), revision surgeries (χ 2 = 5.46, P = 0.02), and length of hospital stay (χ 2 = 0.07, P = 0.03). This study found that patients with coronary vascular disease and longer fusions were at higher risk of postoperative complications and patients with notable intraoperative blood loss were at higher risk of postoperative infections. In addition, physicians should closely follow patients with extended postoperative hospital stays, with advanced age, and undergoing revision surgery because these patients were more likely to be readmitted to the hospital.

The Advantages of 4-rod Construct over the 2-rod Techniques in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients who Underwent Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy: A Multicenter Retrospective Comparative Study

Study DesignRetrospective study ObjectiveTo compare clinicoradiological outcomes and complication profiles of the traditional two-rod construct versus the four-rod construct in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) who underwent pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO). MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of 208 ASD patients who underwent lumbar PSO and long fusion from thoracic to the pelvis at two centers. Two different techniques including the four-rod construct and the traditional two-rod technique were used at the PSO level. Clinicoradiological outcomes and complication profiles of the patients were documented and compared statistically between the groups. ResultsThe four-rod construct was associated with statistically lower rates of rod fracture (44.8% vs 26.4%, p<0.01), pedicular screw loosening at the PSO level (25.3% vs 14.0%, p=0.04) and reoperation (49.4% vs 33.9%, p=0.02). Radiologically, the four-rod technique was associated with higher degree of lumbar lordosis (LL) (-37.4°vs -26.8°; p<0.01) and improved pelvic tilt (PT) (-17.2° vs -9.9°; p<0.01) and sacral vertical axis (SVA) corrections (-211.5° vs -192.2°; p=0.04). Overall, the four-rod construct was associated with improved quality of life (p=0.04) and statistically lower oswestry disability index at 12 months postoperatively (p<0.01). ConclusionsOur results showed that the four-rod construct was associated with statistically lower rates of rod fracture and pedicular screw loosening at the osteotomy level, higher degree of LL correction and improved PT and SVA than the two-rod technique. The four-rod technique was also associated with improved quality of life and disability index and lower complication profiles.

The "Sandwich" Extended Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy for the Treatment of Fixed Sagittal Malalignment: Technical Description, Case Series, and Early Results With 2-Year Outcomes.

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) with fixed sagittal malalignment (FSM) may require a pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) for greater focal lordosis and restoration of global alignment. Despite growing trends in minimizing PSOs given their associated high risks, a considerable portion of patients with ASD still require a lumbar PSO most commonly because of iatrogenic flat back deformity. The purpose of this article is to describe a modified extended PSO technique with additional anterior column support coined the "sandwich" extended PSO (SE-PSO) to promote arthrodesis and report the outcomes in a consecutive case series. Patients with ASD treated with a lumbar SE-PSO at a single institution from 2015 to 2020 were analyzed. Complications, radiographic data, and patient-reported outcomes were compared preoperatively, at immediate postoperative follow-up, and at a 2-year postoperative follow-up (FU). Fourteen patients who underwent revision operations for FSM were included. Improvements in segmental lordosis across the PSO site (14.8 ± 6.8 vs 39.9 ± 7.1, P < .0001), overall lumbar lordosis (14.6 ± 15.4 vs 44.6 ± 12.1, P < .0001), sacral slope (21.0 ± 10.5 31.1 ± 10.7, P = .0150), C7 sagittal vertical axis (140.1 ± 59.0 mm vs 35.9 ± 28.5, P < .0001), and spinopelvic mismatch (52.5 ± 21.3 vs 18.6 ± 14.1, P = .0001) were obtained in all patients. Eight patients experienced perioperative complications, with intraoperative durotomy being the most common (n = 7). Eight patients had a 2-year FU and demonstrated improvements in their segmental lordosis across the PSO site (14.3 ± 7.0 vs 41.3 ± 7.3, P = .0003), overall lumbar lordosis (8.7 ± 17.8 vs 46.1 ± 14.2, P = .0014), sacral slope (19.1 ± 12.8 vs 32.3 ± 12.5, P = .0479), C7 sagittal vertical axis (173.6 ± 54.4 mm vs 35.8 ± 30.0, P < .0001), and spinopelvic mismatch (63.0 ± 19.7 vs 21.1 ± 18.3, P < .0001), all of which were maintained at final FU (P > .05). At 2 years, a significant increase in Scoliosis Research Society-22r total score (2.5 ± 0.8 vs 3.6 ± 0.7, P = .0023 was reported. There were no reports of symptomatic pseudarthrosis or mechanical complications. SE-PSO is an effective technique to correct FSM and is associated with low complications, improved patient-reported outcomes, and spinopelvic parameters that are maintained at 2 years.

Is the pelvic incidence a determinant factor for kyphosis curve patterns of ankylosing spondylitis patients?

To investigate the influence of pelvic incidence (PI) on the kyphosis curve patterns and clinical outcomes in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis and to construct a classification of AS according to the PI value for surgical decision-making. 107 AS patients underwent single-level lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) and finished a minimal of 2-year follow-up. All patients were divided into three groups: low PI (PI ≤ 40°), moderate PI (40° < PI ≤ 60°), and high PI (PI > 60°). Standing lateral radiographs were taken to evaluate the location of kyphotic apex, thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), spino-sacral angle (SSA), global kyphosis (GK), PI, sacral slope (SS), and pelvic tilt (PT). Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) were used to evaluate quality of life. Before surgery, a significant difference was shown in the average LL and the mean GK in high PI group was the largest among the three groups. Correction of SVA, GK and LL in high PI group was the smallest among the three group. No significant difference in clinical outcomes was found among the three groups before surgery and at the final follow-up. Regarding the preoperative sagittal profile, the kyphosis curve pattern of moderate PI group is similar to that of low PI group. For AS patients in these two groups, harmonious sagittal alignment can be restored by a single-level PSO. However, the sagittal imbalance is insufficiently realigned by a single-level PSO in a patient with high PI.

Biomechanical comparison of multi-rod constructs by satellite rod configurations (in-line vs. lateral) and screw types (monoaxial vs. polyaxial) spanning a lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO): is there an optimal configuration?

PurposeMulti-rod constructs are used commonly to stabilize pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSO). This study aimed to evaluate biomechanical properties of different satellite rod configurations and effects of screw-type spanning a PSO.MethodsA validated 3D spinopelvic finite element model with a L3 PSO (30°) was used to evaluate 5 models: (1) Control (T10–pelvis + 2 rods); (2) lateral satellite rods connected via offsets to monoaxial screws (LatSat-Mono) or (3) polyaxial screws (LatSat-Poly); (4) in-line satellite rods connected to monoaxial screws (InSat-Mono) or (4) polyaxial screws (InSat-Poly). Global and PSO range of motions (ROM) were recorded. Rods’ von Mises stresses and PSO forces were recorded and the percent differences from Control were calculated.ResultsAll satellite rods (save InSat-Mono) increased PSO ROM and decreased primary rods’ von Mises stresses at the PSO. Lateral rods increased PSO forces (LatSat-Mono:347.1 N; LatSat-Poly:348.6 N; Control:336 N) and had relatively lower stresses, while in-line rods decreased PSO forces (InSat-Mono:280.1 N; InSat-Poly:330.7 N) and had relatively higher stresses. Relative to polyaxial screws, monoaxial screws further decreased PSO ROM, increased satellite rods’ stresses, and decreased PSO forces for in-line rods, but did not change PSO forces for lateral rods.ConclusionMulti-rod constructs using in-line and lateral satellite rods across a PSO reduced primary rods' stresses. Subtle differences in biomechanics suggest lateral satellite rods, irrespective of screw type, increase PSO forces and lower rod stresses compared to in-line satellite rods, which had a high degree of posterior instrumentation stress shielding and lower PSO forces. Clinical studies are warranted to determine if these findings influence clinical outcomes.

Rod Fracture After Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Using a Side-Tightening Pedicle Screw System in Consecutive Case Series

The objective of this study was to investigate the incidence and risk factors of rod fractures (RFs) after a single-level lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) using a side-tightening (ST) pedicle screw system. Fifty-seven consecutive patients who underwent a single-level lumbar PSO for the degenerative sagittal imbalance at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon using an ST pedicle screw system. Demographic, surgical, and radiographic data were analyzed to investigate the incidence and risk factors for RF. Seven (12.3%) patients showed RF after PSO. Four patients had bilateral RFs, and 3 patients had unilateral RFs. The location of the RF was at the PSO level in 6 of 7 patients. The ratio of adjacent interbody fusion was significantly different between the group with RF and the group without RF (16.7% vs. 74.0%, P= 0.004). The preoperative segmental angle at the PSO vertebra (-6.1°±5.5° vs.-1.7°±4.6°, P= 0.049) and postsurgical change in lumbar lordosis (48.4°±8.8° vs. 37.8°±11.9°, P= 0.033) were significantly different between the 2 groups. Risk factor analysis using stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that the absence of an adjacent interbody cage (odds ratio=0.011, 95% confidence interval=0.000-0.390, P=0.013) was a significant risk factor. The incidence of RF after a single-level lumbar PSO using the ST pedicle screw system was 12.3% in our cohort. The absence of an adjacent interbody cage was a significant risk factor for RF.

When can we expect global sagittal alignment to reach a stable value following cervical deformity surgery?

Cervical deformity (CD) is a complex condition with a clear impact on patient quality of life, which can be improved with surgical treatment. Previous study following thoracolumbar surgery demonstrated a spontaneous and maintained improvement in cervical alignment following lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO). In this study the authors aimed to investigate the complementary questions of whether cervical alignment induces a change in global alignment and whether this change stabilizes over time. To analyze spontaneous changes, this study included only patients with at least 5 levels remaining unfused following surgery. After data were obtained for the entire cohort, repeated-measures analyses were conducted between preoperative baseline and 3-month and 1-year follow-ups with a post hoc analysis and Bonferroni correction. A subanalysis of patients with 2-year follow-up was performed. One-year follow-up data were available for 121 of 168 patients (72%), and 89 patients had at least 5 levels remaining unfused following surgery. Preoperatively there was a moderate anterior cervical alignment (C2-7, -7.7° [kyphosis]; T1 slope minus cervical lordosis, 37.1°; cervical sagittal vertebral axis [cSVA], 37 mm) combined with a posterior global alignment (SVA, -8 mm) with lumbar hyperextension (pelvic incidence [PI] minus lumbar lordosis [LL] mismatch [PI-LL], -0.6°). Patients underwent a significant correction of the cervical alignment (median ΔC2-7, 13.6°). Simultaneously, PI-LL, T1 pelvic angle (TPA), and SVA increased significantly (all p < 0.05) between baseline and 3-month and 1-year follow-ups. Post hoc analysis demonstrated that all of the changes occurred between baseline and 3 months. Subanalysis of patients with complete 2-year follow-up demonstrated similar results, with stable postoperative thoracolumbar alignment achieved at 3 months. Correction of cervical malalignment can have a significant impact on thoracolumbar regional and global alignment. Peak relaxation of compensatory mechanisms is achieved by the 3-month follow-up and tends to remain stable. Subanalysis with 2-year data further supports this finding. These findings can help to identify when the results of cervical surgery on global alignment can be best evaluated.

Multiple-rod constructs and use of bone morphogenetic protein-2 in relation to lower rod fracture rates in 141 patients with adult spinal deformity who underwent lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy.

The purpose of this study was to compare rod fracture (RF) rates among three types of rod constructs (RCs) following lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) for adult spinal deformity (ASD). A retrospective review of consecutive patients with adult spinal deformity who were treated with lumbar PSO between 2007 and 2017 was performed. The minimum follow-up was 2 years. Three RCs were compared: standard (2 main rods), satellite (2 main rods with satellite rod), and nested (2 main rods and 2 short rods spanning osteotomy). Outcomes examined included RF rate, time to RF, pseudarthrosis, and reoperation. Multivariate analysis was used. A total of 141 patients were included 55 with standard, 23 with satellite, and 63 with nested RCs. The mean age was 65.2 years and 34.8% of patients were male. Radiographic preoperative and postoperative results were as follows: sagittal vertical axis (11.0 vs 3.9 cm), lumbar lordosis (28.5° vs 57.1°), pelvic tilt (30.6° vs 21.0°), pelvic incidence (61.5° vs 60.0°), distance between central sacral vertical line and C7 plumb line (2.2 vs 1.5 cm), and scoliosis (18.9° vs 11.3°). The average time to RF was 12.4 months. Overall RF, bilateral RF, pseudarthrosis, and reoperation rates were 22.7%, 5.0%, 20.6%, and 17.7%, respectively. Standard RCs had a significantly higher RF (36.4% vs 13.0% vs 14.3%, p = 0.008), bilateral RF (35.0% vs 0.0% vs 0.0%, p = 0.021), pseudarthrosis (34.5% vs 8.7% vs 12.7%, p = 0.004), and reoperation (30.9% vs 4.3% vs 11.1%, p = 0.004) rates. Satellite RCs (OR 0.21, p = 0.015), nested RCs (OR 0.24, p = 0.003), and bone morphogenetic protein-2 (OR 0.28, p = 0.005) were independently associated with lower odds of RF. Use of multiple rods in the satellite RC and nested RC groups was associated with lower rates of RF, pseudarthrosis, and reoperations following lumbar PSO. Bone morphogenetic protein-2 was associated with a reduction in RF rate as well.

Modified Ondra's Formula to Predict Post-Op SVA after Lumbar PSO: A Preliminary Report Verified by Simulated Post-op Images Via Surgimap Software.

This study aimed to introduce a new mathematical formula to predict sagittal vertical axis (SVA) changes after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO). This cross-sectional study included 43 patients. Lateral full spinal radiographs were exported from Picture Archiving and Communicating Systemand imported to Surgimap (NemarisInc,New York, NY, version 2.3.1.1) software for PSO simulation. Regression analysis was done on the first 16 cases to find a constant variable (K) in the proposed formula. PSOs of 15°, 20°,25°, 30°, and 35°were simulated at L3,L4, and L5 for each patient, and the simulated postoperative SVAs were compared to predict postoperative SVA. Paired T-Test, Spearman test, and analysis of variance were applied to analyze the results. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software (Version 24.0) was used for the statistical analysis. Postoperative SVA was different in terms of PSO level and degree, with a mean of 74.87±37.88, 66.12±38.33, and 56.95±38.53 at 15°; 61.76±36.68, 50.13±37.32, and 43.03±36.67 at 20°; 48.61±35.60, 39.13±35.35, and 43.18±31.56 at 25°; and 37.73±33.78, 42.38±28.76, and 44.81±16.85 at 30° for L3, L4, and L5, respectively (P 0.05). The mean difference between the predicted SVA using the formula and the SVA simulated using Surgimap software was 2.37, 2.09, and 0.47 mm atL3, L4, andL5 levels, respectively. The mathematical formula was highly predictive for postoperative simulated SVA values in all three vertebral levels (L3-L5) (P 0.05). Additionally, a strong relationship was found between the vertebral level and the amount of SVA correction (Spearman correlation: 0.7-0.9). The mathematical formula is an accurate predictor of postoperative SVA and is helpful in PSO surgical planning. However, future studies are recommended to verify its accuracy in a clinical setting.

Failure patterns and related risk factors of sagittal reconstruction following pedicle subtraction osteotomy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis and thoracolumbar kyphosis

The aim of this study was to analyze the specific patterns and risk factors of sagittal reconstruction failure in ankylosing spondylitis (AS)-related thoracolumbar kyphosis after pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO). A retrospective study was performed in patients with AS and thoracolumbar kyphosis after lumbar PSO with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Patients were classified as having successful realignment (group A), inadequate correction immediately postoperatively (group B), and sagittal decompensation during follow-up (group C) according to the immediately postoperative and latest follow-up sagittal vertical axis (SVA). Radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes were collected. Pelvic tilt (PT) was used to assess the magnitude of pelvic backward rotation. Hip structural damage and ossification of the anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL) at the proximal junction, PSO level, and distal junction were also evaluated on radiographs. Overall, 109 patients with a mean age of 35.3 years were included. Patients in both group B (n = 16) and group C (n = 13) were older than those in group A (n = 80) (mean ages 43.6 vs 32.9 years, p < 0.011; and 39.2 vs 32.9 years, p = 0.018; respectively). Age (OR 1.102, p = 0.011), and preoperative PT (OR 1.171, p = 0.041) and SVA (OR 1.041, p = 0.016) were identified as independent risk factors of inadequate correction. Additionally, a higher distribution of patients with adequate ALL ossification at the PSO level was found in group B than in group A (37.5% vs 22.5%, p = 0.003). Age (OR 1.101, p = 0.011) and preoperative SVA (OR 1.013, p = 0.020) were identified as independent risk factors of sagittal decompensation. Furthermore, compared with group A, group C showed a higher distribution of patients with severe hip structural damage (15.4% vs 0, p = 0.018) and higher incidences of rod fracture (RF) (38.5% vs 8.8%, p = 0.011) and pseudarthrosis (15.4% vs 0, p = 0.018). Additionally, the incidence of RF (19.6% vs 6.9%, p = 0.045) and changes in the proximal junctional angle (0.5° vs 2.2°, p = 0.027) and the distal junctional angle (0.3° vs 2.2°, p = 0.019) were lower during follow-up in patients with adequate ALL ossification than in those without adequate ossification. Sagittal reconstruction failure in patients with AS could be attributed to inadequate correction immediately after surgery (14.7%) and sagittal decompensation during follow-up (11.9%). Adequate ALL ossification was a risk factor of inadequate correction. However, adequate ALL ossification could decrease the development of RF and relieve the junctional kyphotic change during follow-up. Older age and greater baseline SVA were independent risk factors for both inadequate correction and sagittal decompensation.

Radiographic outcomes and complications after L4 or L5 pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal malalignment in 102 adult spinal deformity patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up.

The objective of this retrospective study was to provide the radiographic outcomes and complications for pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) performed at the low lumbar spine, i.e., L4 or L5 for ASD patients with fixed sagittal malalignment. ASD patients who underwent L4 or L5 PSO with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs, and complications were collected. Radiographic analysis included lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), thoracic kyphosis (TK), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), spinal lordosis (SL) ratio and global tilt (GT) on standing long-cassette radiographs. A total of 102 patients from 2 spinal centers were analyzed. 66 patients underwent PSO at L4 and 36 patients at L5. From preoperatively to the final follow-up, significant improvements occurred in LL (from -31° to -52°), SVA (from 13 to 5cm), and GT (from 44° to 27°) (all, p < 0.05). 12 patients had transient neurological deficits, and 8 patients had persistent neurological deficit. 23 patients underwent revision for PJK (2), pseudarthrosis (10), neurological deficit (2), epidural hematoma (1), or deep surgical site infection (8). No PJK was observed in any of the patients with L5 PSO. PSO at the level of L4 or L5 remains a challenging technique but with an acceptable rate of complications and revisions. It enables correction of fixed sagittal malalignment in ASD patients with a globally satisfactory outcome. In comparison with L4 PSO, L5 PSO patients did not show PJK as a mechanical complication. Distal lumbar PSO at the level of L5 may represent one of the factors that may help preventing the proximal junctional kyphosis complication.

Lumbar Level Significantly Influences Postoperative Global Sagittal Balance Following Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy.

Retrospective cohort study. The current evidence regarding how level of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) influences correction of sagittal alignment is limited. This study sought to investigate the relationship of lumbar level and segmental angular change (SAC) of PSO with the magnitude of global sagittal alignment correction. This study retrospectively evaluated 53 consecutive patients with adult spinal deformity who underwent lumbar PSO at a single institution. Radiographs were evaluated to quantify the effect of PSO on lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), T1-spinopelvic inclination (T1SPI), T1-pelvic alignment (TPA), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA). Significant correlations were found between PSO SAC and the postoperative increase in LL (r = 0.316, P = .021) and PT (r = 0.352, P = .010), and a decrease in TPA (r = -0.324, P = .018). PSO level significantly correlated with change in T1SPI (r = -0.305, P = .026) and SVA (r = -0.406, P = .002), with more caudal PSO corresponding to a greater correction in sagittal balance. On multivariate analysis, more caudal PSO level independently predicted a greater reduction in T1SPI (β = -3.138, P = .009) and SVA (β = -29.030, P = .001), while larger PSO SAC (β = -0.375, P = .045) and a greater number of fusion levels (β = -1.427, P = .036) predicted a greater reduction in TPA. This study identified a gain of approximately 3 degrees and 3 cm of correction for each level of PSO more caudal to L1. Additionally, a larger PSO SAC predicted greater improvement in TPA. While further investigation of these relationships is warranted, these findings may help guide preoperative PSO level selection.

Does the Change of Acetabular Anteversion Result From Lumbar Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy in Ankylosing Spondylitis-Related Kyphosis After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Retrospective study. To analyze the change in acetabular anteversion (AA) after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis who have already undergone total hip arthroplasty (THA). AS patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis following lumbar PSO from January 2005 to January 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Only the patients performed with THA prior to the PSO were included. AA was measured on the full-length standing posterior-anterior radiographs using the ellipse method. Twenty patients (34 hips) with a mean age of 36.8 years (range, 22 to 63 years) were included. After lumbar PSO, AA was reduced from 18.59° to 5.85° (P < 0.001). Postoperative change in AA was correlated with the spinal deformity correction. Additionally, the change in AA postoperatively was correlated with pelvic incidence (PI) (R = 0.346, P = 0.045). Although the postoperative change in sagittal vertical axis (SVA) was larger in the patients after L2 or L3 PSO (153.97 mm vs 70.03 mm, P = 0.006), no difference was found in the postoperative change in AA (12.83° vs 10.96°, P = 0.540) compared with the patients following L1 PSO. AA was significantly decreased following lumbar PSO and the postoperative change in AA was correlated with the magnitude of spinal deformity correction. Notably, the effect of osteotomy level on the postoperative change in AA was limited in the AS patients underwent 1-level PSO.

Does the Level of Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Affect the Surgical Outcomes in Ankylosing Spondylitis-Related Thoracolumbar Kyphosis With the Same Curve Pattern?

Study Design:A retrospective study.Objective:To investigate the effect of pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) level on the surgical outcomes in ankylosing spondylitis-related thoracolumbar kyphosis with the same curve pattern.Methods:ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis, who underwent 1-level lumbar PSO between March 2006 and June 2017, were retrospectively reviewed. Criteria for curve-matched thoracolumbar kyphosis were: (1) have same level of preoperative apex (pre-apex); (2) have similar global kyphosis (GK, the angle between the superior/inferior endplate of the maximally tilted upper and lower end vertebra) (the difference of GK less than 15˚). The radiographic parameters measured were sagittal vertical axis (SVA, the horizontal distance between the C7 plumb line and the posterosuperior corner of the S1), GK, thoracic kyphosis (TK, the angle between the T5 superior endplate and the T12 inferior endplate), lumbar lordosis (LL, the angle between the L1 and S1 superior endplate), sacral slope (SS, the angle between the sacral endplate and the horizontal line), pelvic tilt (PT, the angle between the vertical and the line joining the midpoint of the sacral plate and hip axis), and pelvic incidence (PI, the angle between the line vertical to the superior margin of S1 and the line connecting the sacral plate midpoint with the hip joint axis). All of these parameters and health-related quality of life (HRQoL, evaluated by preoperative and the last follow-up questionnaires including ODI and VAS) scores were collected before surgery and at the last follow-up. According to their osteotomy level, patients were devided into 2 sub-groups (L1 group and L2 group), and differences of these mentioned parameters between 2 groups were compared.Results:26 curve-matched patients were recruited with a mean follow-up of 37.2 months. All patients improved significantly after surgery in HRQoL scores (VAS 1.6 vs 5.4, P < 0.001; ODI 11.9 vs 26.4, P < 0.001). Except for TK and PI, those radiographic parameters were also observed to be significantly changed after surgery. Compared to L2 group, PSO at L1 may have larger correction of TK (ΔTK -6.8 vs -0.3°, P = 0.164), PI (ΔPI -7.4 vs -0.7°, P = 0.364) and smaller correction of SVA (ΔSVA -105.3 vs -128.5 mm, P = 0.096), LL (ΔLL -31.1 vs -43.0°, P = 0.307) and SS (ΔSS 6.9 vs 12.2°, P = 0.279) but had no statistical significance.Conclusion:The results of this investigation showed that in AS-related thoracolumbar kyphosis patients with the same curve pattern, the different levels of osteotomy had little effect on the improvement of surgical outcomes. However, osteotomy at L2 is more likely to obtain a larger correction of SVA compared to osteotomy at L1.

Comprehensive Evaluation of Accessory Rod Position, Rod Material and Diameter, Use of Cross-connectors, and Anterior Column Support in a Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Model: Part I: Effects on Apical Rod Strain: An In Vitro and In Silico Biomechanical Study.

In silico finite element study. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of six construct factors on apical rod strain in an in silico pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) model: traditional inline and alternative Ames-Deviren-Gupta (ADG) multi-rod techniques, number of accessory rods (three- vs. four-rod), rod material (cobalt-chrome [CoCr] or stainless steel [SS] vs. titanium [Ti]), rod diameter (5.5 vs. 6.35 mm), and use of cross-connectors (CC), or anterior column support (ACS). Rod fracture following lumbar PSO is frequently reported. Clinicians may modulate reconstructs with multiple rods, rod position, rod material and diameter, and with CC or ACS to reduce mechanical demand or rod contouring. A comprehensive evaluation of these features on rod strain is lacking. A finite element model (T12-S1) with intervertebral discs and ligaments was created and validated with cadaveric motion data. Apical rod strain of primary and accessory rods was collected for 96 constructs across all six construct factors, and normalized to the Ti two-rod control. Regardless of construct features, CoCr and SS material reduced strain across all rods by 49.1% and 38.1%, respectively; increasing rod diameter from 5.5 mm to 6.35 mm rods reduced strain by 32.0%. Use of CC or lumbosacral ACS minimally affected apical rod strain (<2% difference from constructs without CC or ACS). Compared to the ADG technique, traditional inline reconstruction reduced primary rod strain by 32.2%; however, ADG primary rod required 14.2° less rod contouring. The inline technique produced asymmetrical loading between left and right rods, only when three rods were used. The number of rods and position of accessory rods affected strain distribution on posterior fixation. Increasing rod diameter and using CoCr rods was most effective in reducing rod strain. Neither CC nor lumbosacral ACS affected apical rod strain. N/A.

Surgical strategy for revisional lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy to correct fixed sagittal imbalance: The effect of the osteotomy level and iliac screw fixation

BackgroundMore caudal osteotomy is believed to lead to greater sagittal correction; however, the osteotomy level and whether or not to use iliac screw fixation (ISF) are topics of on-going debate. The aim of this study was to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes after revisional lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) for fixed sagittal imbalance (FSI) according to the osteotomy level and ISF. MethodsAll consecutive patients who underwent revisional PSO (at L3 or L4) for FSI in a single institute from July 2006 to January 2014 were investigated retrospectively. Thirty-eight patients with at least 2-year follow-up were finally included. Clinical outcomes including the visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were investigated. Radiographic spinopelvic parameters were analyzed according to the level of PSO, the degree of correction, and the use of ISF. ResultsThe mean number of fused segments after PSO was 6.6 ± 1.8. Sagittal vertical axis (SVA) was restored after the surgery (12, 2.5, and 5.2 cm at preoperative, postoperative, and the last follow-up, respectively). PSO was performed at L3 in 16 patients and at L4 in 22 patients. The osteotomy level was not associated with any changes of spinopelvic parameters (pelvic tilt [PT] or lumbar lordosis) or sagittal alignment (T1-pelvic angle [TPA] or SVA). However, better TPA restoration was achieved with more osteotomy resection angle (P = 0.031). ISF group showed significant improvement in postoperative pelvic orientation (PT and ratio of PT to pelvic incidence) which was maintained until the last follow-up. ConclusionsAlthough postoperative sagittal alignment was different in FSI patients according to the osteotomy level, pelvic orientation improved in ISF group. Also, the degree of correction showed significant associations with sagittal alignment. When performing revisional PSO for FSI, spine surgeon should carefully consider how to correct rather than where to do the osteotomy, and the role of ISF.

Effect of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy level on lordosis distribution and shape.

Little is known about the qualitative results (postoperative upper/lower lumbar arches distribution and lumbar apex or inflection point positioning) of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomies (L-PSO) depending on the level of L-PSO. We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of adult deformity patients undergoing single-level L-PSO. We analyzed several variables in preoperative and postoperative sagittal radiographs: L-PSO level, Roussouly classification (R-type), inflection point (InfP), lumbar apex (LApex), spinopelvic parameters, lordosis distribution index (LDI = L4-S1/L1-S1), and number of levels in the lordosis (NVL). Comparisons between PSO levels were performed to determine lordosis distribution and sagittal shape using ANOVA test and Chi-squared statistics. A total of 126 patients were included in this study. L5-PSO mainly increased the lower lumbar arch, thereby increasing LDI. L4 increased upper/lower arches similarly. PSOs at and above L3 increased the upper lumbar arch, thereby decreasing LDI (P < 0.001). L4-PSO added 1 vertebra into the lordosis (NVL = + 1.2 ± 2.2). PSOs above L3 added 2 vertebrae into the lordosis (NVL = + 2.3 ± 1.4). Overall P = 0.007. PSOs above L4 shifted the LApex cranially in 70% of the cases (mean 1.12 levels) and the InfP in 85% of the cases (mean 2.4 levels). L5-PSO shifted the LApex caudally in 70% of the cases (mean - 1.1 levels) and the InfP in 50% of the cases (mean - 1.6 levels). Overall P < 0.006. The L-PSO level was not associated with a specific Roussouly-type P > 0.05. The level of L-PSO influenced upper/lower lumbar arches distribution, and lumbar apex and inflection point positioning. The correct level should be chosen based on the individual assessment of each patient.

Ideal sagittal profile restoration and ideal lumbar apex positioning play an important role in postoperative mechanical complications after a lumbar PSO.

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. To determine the influence of postoperative ideal lordosis distribution and ideal sagittal harmony on mechanical complications in patients undergoing one-level lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (L-PSO). Many variables have been associated with mechanical complications after L-PSO. However, the impact of restoring the ideal inflexion point, lumbar apex, and sagittal shape is still underexplored. Analyzed risk factors were: age and patient-related variables, PSO level, interbody cages, rod material/diameter, number of rods, upper instrumented vertebra, lower instrumented vertebra, PI-LL mismatch, global tilt (GT), postoperative level of lumbar apex (LApex), postoperative level of inflexion point (InfxP), and postoperative type of Roussouly sagittal profile (R-type). These last variables were compared to ideal (based on pelvic incidence). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risks for mechanical complications with a minimum 2-year follow-up. A total of 87 patients were included. Mean follow-up was 4.5 ± 1.7years. 40.2% of the patients suffered postoperative mechanical complications (7 PJK, 4 PJF, 18 pseudoarthrosis/rod breakage, 6 screw pullout). Mean time for complications was 584 ± 416days from surgery. Univariate analysis showed that age (63 vs 57years; P = 0.04), BMI (28.1 vs 25.9; P = 0.024), preoperative-GT (50.7° vs 38.7°; P < 0.001), postoperative-GT (28.9° vs 23.4°; P = 0.018), postoperative LApex location mismatched from ideal (77.8% vs 22.2%; P = 0.036), and postoperative R-type mismatched from ideal (67.6% vs 22.6%; P < 0.001) were significantly related to mechanical complications. The independent factorsselected bymultivariate analysis were: postoperative R-type mismatched from ideal OR 11.3 (95% CI 3.9-32.6; P < 0.001), age OR 1.05 (95% CI 1-1.1; P = 0.03), and LApex matching OR 0.5 (95% CI 0.27-0.97; P = 0.04). The further the LApex was from its ideal position, the higher the risk of mechanical complications (P = 0.036). Over other multiple suspected risk factors, proper lumbar apex position and ideal sagittal shape restoration played an important role in postoperative mechanical complications after L-PSO. III.

Hip involvement negatively impact the postoperative radiographic outcomes after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis-a retrospective study

Background: Lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) can significantly correct thoracic kyphosis and relieve the compensatory pelvic backward tilt. However, hip involvement occurred in some advanced AS patients could restrict the rotation of the pelvis around the femoral heads, which may affect the postoperative radiographic outcomes after lumbar PSO. The aim of the study is to identify whether hip involvement will negatively impact the postoperative radiographic outcomes after lumbar PSO in AS patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis. Method s: From March 2009 to June 2013, a total of 44 consecutive AS patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis undergoing one-level lumbar PSO were retrospectively reviewed. All the patients had more than 2-year follow-up. Hip involvement was evaluated based on the Bath ankylosing spondylitis radiology index-hip (BASRI-hip) and defined by a score of at least 2. All patients were divided into group A (patients without hip involvement) and group B (patients with hip involvement). Radiographical measurements included sagittal vertical axis (SVA), global kyphosis (GK), thoracic kyphosis (TK), local kyphosis (LK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS). Results : The preoperative SVA and PT was not significantly different between group A and group B (SVA: 14.0 ± 6.3cm vs. 14.7 ± 6.0cm, P &gt; 0.05; PT: 36.8° ± 7.1° vs. 37.3° ± 7.7°, P &gt; 0.05), and both groups had similar magnitudes of kyphosis corrections (LK correction: 44.9° ± 4.9° vs. 44.2° ± 8.3°, P &gt; 0.05). However, group B had significantly larger SVA and PT than group A (SVA: 7.6 ± 4.5cm vs 3.5 ± 3.4cm, P &lt; 0.05; PT: 28.1° ± 8.6° vs. 19.0° ± 8.0°, P &lt; 0.05) at the last follow-up. Conclusion: In AS patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis, hip involvement lead to insufficient correction of SVA and PT after lumbar PSO, which negatively impact postoperative radiographic outcomes. For these patients, additional osteotomies may be recommended for satisfactory correction outcomes. Key words: ankylosing spondylitis, thoracolumbar kyphosis, pedicle subtraction osteotomy, hip involvement