Lordosis Research Articles

Effectiveness of robot-assisted minimally invasive and open freehand transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in treatment of single-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and the influence on adjacent segment degeneration

To compare the effectiveness of robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) and open freehand TLIF for the treatment of single-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DSL) and analyse the influence on postoperative adjacent segmental degeneration (ASD). The clinical data of 116 patients with L 4、5 DLS who were admitted between November 2019 and October 2021 and met the selection criteria were retrospectively analyzed. According to the surgical methods, they were divided into the robotic group (45 cases, who underwent robot-assisted MIS-TLIF) and the open group (71 cases, who underwent open freehand TLIF). There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, body mass index, DLS Meyerding grading, and preoperative Pfirrmann grading, Weishaupt grading, L 3, 4 intervertebral disc height (DH), L 3, 4 intervertebral mobility, sagittal parameters [including pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT)], and Cage height ( P>0.05). The grade of facet joint violation (FJV) by pedicle screws on the superior articular process was assessed postoperatively. Sagittal parameters, L 3, 4 DH, L 3, 4 DH loss, and L 3, 4 intervertebral mobility were measured preoperatively and at last follow-up in order to determine whether ASD occurred. Based on the occurrence of postoperative ASD, logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors for ASD after TLIF. Patients in both groups were followed up 21-47 months, with a mean of 36.1 months; there was no significant difference in the follow-up time between the two groups ( P>0.05). The occurrence of postoperative FJV was significantly better in the robotic group than in the open group ( P<0.05). At last follow-up, the difference in the change values of sagittal parameters PI, PT, SS, and LL was not significant when comparing the two groups of patients ( P>0.05); the change values of L 3, 4 DH and L 3, 4 DH loss in the robotic group were smaller than those in the open group, and the change value of L 3, 4 intervertebral mobility was larger than that in the open group, and the differences were significant ( P<0.05). At last follow-up, ASD occurred in 8 patients (17.8%) in the robotic group and 35 patients (49.3%) in the open group, and the difference in ASD incidence between the two groups was significant ( P<0.05). logistic regression analysis showed that open surgery, preoperative Pfirrmann grading Ⅳ-Ⅴ, preoperative Weishaupt grading ≥2, and postoperative FJV grading ≥1 were risk factors for the development of ASD after TLIF ( P<0.05). Compared with traditional open surgery, orthopedic robot-assisted MIS-TLIF in the treatment of single-level DLS can more accurately insert pedicle screws, reduce the loss of DH and the occurrence of FJV, and effectively reduce the incidence of mid-postoperative ASD. Preoperative disc and synovial joint degeneration in adjacent segments, nonrobotic-assisted minimally invasive therapy, and FJV are risk factors for ASD after TLIF.

Comparing outcomes for single-segment vertebral column decancellation performed at different vertebras in ankylosing spondylitis-an observational study.

The surgical procedure of vertebral column decancellation (VCD) has been increasingly performed in orthopaedic surgery for those with spinal deformity. To investigate the results of single-segment VCD performed at different vertebra for correcting thoracolumbar kyphosis in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and to guide the osteotomy strategy. Eighty-six AS patients (77 males, 9 females) having thoracolumbar kyphosis underwent single-segment VCD (ranging from T12 to L3) between January 2016 and September 2019 were enrolled and divided into four groups according to the osteotomy vertebra: T12 in 9 cases (Group A), L1 in 15 cases (Group B), L2 in 47 cases (Group C), and L3 in 15 cases (Group D). Demographics, operational data, radiological and clinical data were compared among the four groups. All patients had significant improvements in spinopelvic alignments and health-related quality of life after correction surgeries. Having the similar demographics, patients in the group C obtained the maximum local kyphosis and global kyphosis correction of 45.05° ± 9.07° (P < 0.001) and 43.42° ± 11.24° (P < 0.001) respectively. However, those in the group A had the largest correction in thoracic kyphosis (41.88° ± 9.57°) and chin-brow vertical angle (24.74° ± 6.38°) respectively (P < 0.001). Moreover, the VCD of L2 or L3 would result in much larger correction in lumbar lordosis and sagittal vertical axis than those in the group A and B respectively (P < 0.001), patients in the group A and B suffered from much higher incidence of complications perioperatively although (P = 0.043). Single-segment VCD performed among thoracolumbar segments can effectively restore spinopelvic alignments and improve the health related quality of life for AS patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis deformity. Moreover, L2 may be the optimal osteotomy vertebra for those patients. Clinical trial number: not applicable. III, therapeutic study.

Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols on Outcomes Up to Two Years After Adult Structural Spine Disorder Surgery

Study Design. Retrospective cohort study of prospectively enrolled database Objective. We analyze the recovery pattern of Adult Structural Spine Disorder (ASD) patients who underwent corrective surgery with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol (ERAS+), including physical and psychological prehabilitation components, compared to non-ERAS protocol (ERAS-) up to 2-years after surgery. Summary of Background Data. Spine surgery for ASD is often highly invasive, which can contribute to prolonged recovery. The trajectory of recovery may be accelerated by the application of enhanced recovery principles. Methods. Inclusion criteria were operative patients with ASD&gt;18yrs with complete baseline, 90 days perioperative, and 2-year postoperative data. We assessed differences in baseline demographics, surgical details, baseline Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL), and surgical outcomes between ERAS+ and ERAS- patients. Outcomes included adverse events, reoperations, and radiographic parameters such as sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), lumbar lordosis (LL), T2–T12 kyphosis, and maximum Cobb angle. Additionally, HRQL measures included the PCS, ODI, NDI, EQ-5D, SRS-22r total and domain scores, NRS-Back, and NRS-Leg. We used multivariable logistic regression and ANCOVA to adjust for confounding. Results. 471 patients with ASD met inclusion criteria, with 59 designated ERAS+. Those individuals ERAS+ were older (64.1±13.0 vs. 58.0±16.0;P=0.005), had a higher CCI, (2.4±1.8 vs. 1.4±1.6;P&lt;0.001), and exhibited a higher modified ASD frailty index (8.2±5.4 vs. 6.3±4.9;P=0.019). Adjusted analysis demonstrated the ERAS+ cohort demonstrated lower likelihood of overall reoperations (OR:0.3; 95%CI:0.13-0.89), and a lower likelihood of overall adverse events (OR:0.4;CI95%:0.19-0.93). ERAS+ was more likely to achieve the MCID in the SRS-22r Total scores at 6 months(OR:3.1;CI95%:1.2-8.4), self-image domain at 6 months (OR:9.0;CI95%:1.6-50.0), in the pain domain at 6 months (OR:3.5;CI95%:1.01-11.9) and 1 year postoperatively (OR:2.6;CI95%:1.03-6.7), and in the SF-36’s physical component summary scores (PCS) at 1 year (OR:2.1;CI95%:1.05-4.2). No other statistically significant differences in HRQL were observed at the remaining time points (P&gt;0.05). Conclusion. Our work is the first to evaluate HRQL metrics and complication over two-years following ASD correction with ERAS. Despite presenting with more severe baseline frailty and higher comorbidity profiles, patients with ASD who underwent corrective surgery with an ERAS protocol experienced fewer short-term adverse events, and improved HRQL. We believe ERAS following ASD surgery leads to faster functional recovery, reduced postoperative deconditioning, and improved quality of life.

Effect of different corrective force directions applied by spinal orthoses on the patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Spinal orthoses are commonly prescribed for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), yet their three-dimensional correction was not fully understood. The amount of deformity control largely depends on the corrective forces applied, which remain empirically based due to a lack of consensus on optimal force application. This study investigated the effects of different corrective force directions exerted by spinal orthoses on patients with AIS. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 78 subjects. The trunk was segmented into four quadrants using coronal and sagittal planes from a top-down perspective. Each left or right posterolateral quadrant (with 90°) was further subdivided into zones 1-4, from the sagittal to coronal planes. Based on the zone where the resultant corrective force direction fell, the subjects were categorized into Group 1 (zone 1), Group 2 (zone 2), Group 3 (zone 3), or Group 4 (zone 4). The direction of the corrective force was estimated using modified models of the subjects' bodies, designed through a computer-aided design and manufacturing system integral to the orthosis fabrication process. The effects of corrective forces in different zones on scoliotic spine were assessed. Among the subjects, 3 were in Group 1, 17 in Group 2, 52 in Group 3, and 6 in Group 4. Due to the limited number of subjects, data from Groups 1 and 4 were not analysed. Groups 2 and 3 showed significant reductions in Cobb angle in the coronal plane and plane of maximum curvature (PMC) following orthosis fitting (p < 0.05). Group 2 displayed a significant decrease > 5º in thoracic kyphosis (p < 0.05). Both Groups 2 and 3 exhibited significant reductions in lumbar lordosis. PMC orientation remained unchanged over time (p > 0.05) but was notably higher in Group 2 after orthosis fitting (p < 0.05). Corrective forces applied by spinal orthoses in zones 2 and 3 effectively controlled lateral curve progression. Notably, only forces in zone 3 neither significantly reduced thoracic kyphosis nor exacerbated the deviation of scoliotic spine from the sagittal plane. Further research is needed to validate and expand upon these results.

Efficacy of intervertebral release combined with asymmetric osteotomy in rigid degenerative scoliosis.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of treating patients with rigid degenerative scoliosis by restoring intervertebral balance through a combination of interbody release and asymmetric grade 1 and 2 osteotomy. The medical collected clinical and radiographic data of patients with rigid degenerative scoliosis from our department between 2015 and 2022. A total of 60 patients were included in the study, comprising 20 males and 40 females, with an average follow-up period of 30.7 months. Data recorded included surgery duration, blood loss, number of fixed segments, hospital stay, complications, clinical scores, and radiographic parameters. The sagittal vertical axis improved from 4.28 ± 1.48cm preoperatively to 2.90 ± 1.18cm postoperatively, while the coronal vertical axis improved from 3.29 ± 1.72cm preoperatively to 1.12 ± 0.62cm postoperatively. The preoperative coronal Cobb angle was 30.85 ± 7.33°, which improved to 4.14 ± 3.06°postoperatively. Additionally, lumbar lordosis increased from 24.50 ± 17.24°preoperatively to 30.35 ± 6.11°postoperatively. VAS scores for back pain and leg pain, ODI scores, and JOA scores showed varying degrees of improvement. Interbody release combined with asymmetric Grade 1 and 2 osteotomy to restore intervertebral balance significantly improves spinal deformity and postoperative functional scores in patients with rigid degenerative scoliosis.

A correlation study of weak core muscles with hamstring muscles flexibility in young adults

Abstract Background Hamstring, being a two-joint muscle, tends to shorten over time, resulting in tightness, affecting performance in daily activities and is also capable of generating exaggerated posterior pelvic tilt, leading to decreased lumbar lordosis. Weak core muscles have been associated with hamstring tightness, and strengthening the core has been attempted in an effort to relax the hamstring tightness. It is believed that the hamstrings overact and over a period of time tightens, when the core is weak, to compensate for postural stability. Method Thirty-three subjects, both male and females with and without hamstring tightness, were assessed for their core endurance through McGill’s core endurance test battery. It was followed by active knee extension test to determine degree of hamstring tightness on both sides. Correlation between the two variables was statistically analyzed. Results Pearson’s correlation was used to analyze the collected data. A moderate positive but significant correlation (p = 0.02) was found between flexor endurance test and active knee extension (both sides). A weak positive but significant correlation (p = 0.05) was found between extensor endurance test and active knee extension (both sides). Correlation between the right and left lateral bridge with their respective side hamstring flexibility was negative and not significant (p = 0.916 (right lateral torso endurance); p = 0.339 (left lateral torso endurance)). Conclusion Since there is a moderate positive but significant correlation between the flexion torso endurance test and both side hamstring flexibility and a weak positive but significant correlation between extension torso endurance test and both side hamstring flexibility, the core (flexor, extensor, and lateral) should be thought of as a whole unit when strengthening in order to maintain and improve hamstring flexibility.

Shape of the Sagittal Curvatures of the Spine in Young Female Volleyball Players

Background: The issue of the relation betweeen training loads on the shape of the spine of young players is of significant importance, as with the advancement of training seniority, unfavorable changes may be perpetuated resulting in possible consequences in the next stages of ontogenesis. The aim of this study was to assess the formation of the sagittal curvatures of the spine in girls practicing volleyball versus their nonpractising peers. Methods: We examined 60 girls aged 10–13 years, including 30 volleyball players and 30 untrained peers. The Baseline Bubble inclinometer was applied as a research. The data were analyzed based on Mann–Whitney U test and Pearson Chi-square test. Results. There were statistically significant intergroup differences in lumbar lordosis curvature values (Z = −2.67; p = 0.007). The prevalence of correctness values of the thoracic kyphosis curvature, was group-dependent (χ2(1) = 4.34; p = 0.037). Group also determined the prevalence of lumbar lordosis normalities (χ2(1) = 5.41; p = 0.020). Conclusions. Volleyball has a beneficial effect on the formation of the thoracic kyphosis, while the lumbar lordosis is shallowed under the influence of training. This indicates the need for a holistic approach to player training and the need to supplement the technique and tactics training with exercises to strengthen the muscles that stabilize the lumbar spine, improve spinal mobility, learn how to control the anterior tilt of the pelvis and train the fascia.

Efficacy comparison of the S8 navigation-assisted correction versus manual correction in adolescent congenital scoliosis

Objective: Comparison of the efficacy of S8 navigation system-assisted correction versus manual correction in the treatment of adolescent congenital scoliosis (ACS). Methods: A cohort study. A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical and imaging data of 48 patients with congenital scoliosis who were treated at the Honghui Hospital Affiliated with Xi'an Jiaotong University between May 2021 and January 2023. Based on the auxiliary systems, the patients were divided into two groups: the S8 navigation system-assisted correction group (navigation group, n=20) and the C-arm-assisted manual correction group (manual group, n=28). The primary outcome measures were coronal balance (CB), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL), and the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire. The secondary outcome measures included surgery-related conditions and postoperative complications. Results: Of the 48 patients, there were 21 males and 27 females, with a mean age of (13.3±3.0) years. There was no statistically significant differences in preoperative distance of C7 plumb line to center sacral vertical line (C7PL-CSVL), SVA, LL, PI, PT, PI-LL mismatch, or SRS-22 scores between the two groups (all P>0.05). Postoperatively, the C7PL-CSVL and SVA in the navigation group were both better than in the manual group [(12.51±11.86) mm vs (19.64±1.33) mm, (15.72±3.64) mm vs (25.42±2.53) mm, both P<0.05]. There was no statistically significant differences in postoperative LL, PI, PT, PI-LL mismatch, or SRS-22 scores between the two groups (all P>0.05). The accuracy rates for Grade 0 and Grade 0+1 screw placements were 91.17% (93/102) and 95.09% (97/102) in the navigation group, respectively, which were higher than those in the manual group [84.45% (125/148) and 91.89% (136/148), respectively] (both P<0.05). The rates of adjacent facet joint violation in Grades A, B, and C were 88.23% (90/102), 11.76% (12/102), and 0 (0/102) in the navigation group, respectively, which were all better than those in the manual group [83.44% (121/145), 8.96% (13/145), and 7.58% (11/145)] (P=0.015). The navigation group had shorter operative time, single screw placement time, and total screw placement time, and the distance between the screws and the cortex was closer compared to the manual group (all P<0.05). Intraoperative blood loss in the manual group was higher than that in the navigation group (P<0.05). The average curve correction rate in the navigation group (74.68%±10.70%) was better than that in the manual group (59.60%±6.90%) (P<0.001). The intraoperative fluoroscopy dose in the navigation group was higher than that in the manual group [(416±70) mGy vs (360±81) mGy, P=0.015]. The incision length in the navigation group was longer than that in the manual group (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in preoperative VAS pain score between the two groups (P>0.05). The postoperative visual analogue scale scores of pain on day 3 was better in the navigation group [(2.60±0.22) vs (3.10±0.32), P<0.001], while there was no statistically significant differences at other time points between the two groups (all P>0.05). No complications occurred in either group. Conclusion: The S8 navigation system demonstrates good corrective outcomes, high screw placement accuracy, low facet joint violation, and favorable clinical results in the treatment of adolescent congenital scoliosis, making it an ideal auxiliary tool.

Radiological Spinopelvic Parameters Can Be Risk Factors for Early Total Hip Replacement After Spine Fusion.

Interest in the correlation between the spinopelvic complex and its radiographic parameters in early total hip arthroplasty has been increasing. This study investigated whether radiological spinopelvic parameters are risk factors for early total hip replacement (THR) within 1 year of spinal fusion surgery. The primary research question focused on identifying specific spinopelvic changes that may lead to early THR. We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusion between 2016 and 2021. The patients were divided into 2 groups: patients who underwent early THR (n = 35) and patients who did not (n = 213). Spinopelvic parameters, including pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt, lumbar lordosis, thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), sagittal vertical axis, and thoracic kyphosis (TK), were measured before and after surgery. The statistical analyses included inverse probability of treatment weighting, independent t tests, χ 2 tests, and logistic regression analyses. A total of 248 patients were included in the study. The pre- and postoperative TLK and TK angles were significantly smaller in the early THR group than in the late THR group. Increases in the PI and SS after surgery were significant risk factors. The use of interbody fusion techniques was associated with a higher rate of early THR. The difference in the PI minus lumbar lordosis before and after surgery was also significantly correlated with early THR. Abnormal spinopelvic parameters, especially reduced TLK and TK angles and increased PI and SS, are risk factors for early THR. Changes in spinopelvic parameters can lead to rapid hip joint destruction, which highlights the need for careful preoperative evaluation and postoperative monitoring of patients to prevent early THR.

Biportal Endoscopic TLIF With an Expandable Cage: Technical Note and Preliminary Results in Terms of Segmental Lordosis Achievement and Disc Height Elevation.

Biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (BE-TLIF) is a minimally invasive TLIF (MIS-TLIF) technique, commonly performed with various cage types. Expandable cages are particularly effective in achieving segmental lordosis (SL) and disc height (DH) elevation in minimally invasive TLIF. However, the published literature lacks details regarding how these outcomes can be accomplished using BE-TLIF with an expandable cage. Nine cases (10 levels) of BE-TLIF with an expandable cage were reviewed. Procedures including unilateral laminotomy and bilateral decompression, cage expansion trials, and bilateral facetectomies were carried out under biportal endoscopy to achieve SL and DH elevation. Postoperative standing x-ray images at 3 months and reconstructed computed tomography images were analyzed. The sublaminar decompression angle-measured as the angle between the spinous process and the sublaminar decompression line on axial computed tomography-was used to evaluate contralateral sublaminar decompression. All procedures were completed without changes to the surgical methods. Eight patients underwent single-level fusion, with 4 of them receiving additional decompression at adjacent levels. One patient underwent a 2-level fusion. Four cases utilized 12° lordotic cages, while the rest employed 20° hyperlordotic cages. The total time for each fusion was 152.5 ± 38.5 minutes. Segmental lordosis increased by 5.1°, with anterior and posterior DH elevations of 4.8 ± 1.7 mm and 3.1 ± 1.8 mm, respectively. No endplate injuries or early cage subsidence occurred. The mean sublaminar decompression angle was 31.8° ± 7.0°. BE-TLIF with an expandable cage may offer benefits in SL correction and DH elevation. These advantages are attributed to the use of more lordotic expandable cages, combined with contralateral facetectomies and careful endplate preparation-key features of the BE-TLIF technique. SL correction and DH elevation can be achieved through BE-TLIF, which helps to reduce the recurrence of symptoms and improves the lumbar lordotic curve.

Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy versus Coblation Nucleoplasty Combined with Collagenase Chemonucleolysis for Lumbar Disc Herniation with Grade I Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.

To investigate the short-term clinical effect of transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) versus coblation nucleoplasty (CN) combined with collagenase chemonucleolysis (CCNL) in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) with grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis. From January 2019 to December 2020, 60 patients who had LDH with grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis were divided into two groups. Group A adopted TELD while Group B adopted CN combined with CCNL. The surgical efficacy was evaluated according to the visual analogue scale (VAS), oswestry disability index (ODI), quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15), and modified MacNab criteria. Imaging findings including lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lordosis angle (SL), slip percentage (SP), and disc height (DH) were compared between the two groups pre-operation and at the last follow-up. VAS (back and leg), ODI, and QoR-15 were significantly decreased at each time point after operation in all groups. There were significant differences in VAS (back and leg), ODI, and QoR-15 between the two groups at 3days post-operation (P<0.05), VAS (leg), ODI, and QoR-15 at 3months post-operative (P<0.05), and QoR-15 at 6months post-operative (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in LL, SL, SP, and DH between the two groups at the last follow-up (P>0.05). Both the two operations can relieve the symptoms of lower back and leg pain in patients, and neither of the two operations caused further progress of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Compared with CN combined with CCNL, TELD had more significant improvement in early lower back and leg pain and shorter post-operative duration of hospitalization. The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (ChiCTR2300076809).

Effect of Shoulder Flexion Range of Motion and Trunk Muscle Activity on Lumbar Lordosis in the Streamlined Posture in Healthy Young Men

Effect of Shoulder Flexion Range of Motion and Trunk Muscle Activity on Lumbar Lordosis in the Streamlined Posture in Healthy Young Men

Which components of the global alignment proportionality score have the greatest impact on outcomes in adult spinal deformity corrective surgery?

To investigate the impact of the Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score components on patient outcomes in Adult Spine Deformity (ASD) surgery. Patients included underwent assessment via the GAP score and its individual components: pelvic version (GAP PV), lumbar lordosis (GAP LL), lumbar distribution index (GAP LDI) and spinopelvic component (GAP SP). Multivariable analyses assessed the association between alignment in these components and clinical outcomes in ASD patients. 762 ASD patients met inclusion criteria. Alignment in GAP SP independently predicted meeting MCID for SR-22S and ODI and was associated with a lower likelihood of developing mechanical complications. Patients aligned in GAP SP were less likely to develop proximal junctional kyphosis (OR 0.42, 0.26-0.73, p = 0.01) and PJF (OR 0.3, 0.13-0.74, p = 0.01). Proportioned alignment in GAP SP with disproportioned alignment in GAP LDI contributed to an increased risk of PJK and PJF (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.95-6.82, p = 0.045). There was no significant association of GAP SP proportionality and GAP RPV (OR 1.1, 0.86-2.15, p = 0.253) or GAP LL (OR 1.34, 0.78-4.23, p = 0.673) disproportionality with outcomes. Disproportioned alignment in GAP SP but proportioned alignment in both GAP LL and GAP LDI was associated with decreased likelihood of PJK (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.39-0.94, p = 0.02) and PJF (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.19-0.67, p = 0.001). The spinopelvic component of the GAP score is the most significant independent predictor of clinical outcomes. Its interaction with the other components of the GAP score also aids assessment of the risk for mechanical complications.

Anterior column realignment better restores sagittal alignment but carries higher risk of mechanical failures than lateral lumbar interbody fusion in patients with degenerative sagittal imbalance

Background of contextAnterior column realignment (ACR), a modified lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), is an emerging, less invasive technique that allows greater lordosis correction by releasing anterior longitudinal ligament. However, long-term results have been poorly documented with regard to mechanical failure, such as proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and rod fracture (RF), and clinical outcomes. PurposeTo compare the outcomes, primarily mechanical failure, in patients with degenerative sagittal imbalance (DSI) treated with ACR versus LLIF alone. Study design/settingRetrospective study Patient samplePatients ≥ 60 years of age; severe DSI defined by pelvic incidence (PI) - lumbar lordosis (LL) ≥ 20°; performance of ≥ 2-level LLIF; and ≥ 5 total fused levels including the sacrum. Outcome measuresMechanical failure such as PJK and RF; radiographic results; clinical outcomes MethodsEnrolled patients were divided into two groups, based on whether their anterior reconstruction was accomplished with ACR or LLIF alone: ACR and LLIF groups. Mechanical failures were compared between the two groups as a composite outcome including PJK and /or RF. PJK was defined as proximal junctional angle (PJA) >28° and Δ PJA >22°. Only RFs developing at the level with corresponding procedures (ACR or LLIF) were included in the analysis. Logistic regression was performed to compare the relative risk of mechanical failure between the ACR and LLIF groups. The radiographic and clinical outcomes were also compared between the groups. ResultsThe final study cohort consisted of 210 patients. The mean age was 69.6 years, and there were 190 females (90.5%). There were 124 patients in the ACR group and 86 patients in the LLIF group. Perioperative changes for all sagittal parameters were significantly greater in the ACR group than in the LLIF group. Overall mechanical failure rates were significantly higher in the ACR group than in the LLIF group (32.3% vs. 14.0%, P = 0.003). Multivariate regression analysis with adjusting potential confounders revealed that ACR carried a significantly higher risk of mechanical failure than LLIF (Odds ratio = 5.6, 95% confidence interval = 2.0 – 15.6, P < 0.001). The final clinical outcomes were worse in the ACR group than in the LLIF group. ConclusionACR restored the sagittal malalignment more powerfully than did LLIF. However, compared to the LLIF, ACR was associated with a greater risk of mechanical failures and revision surgery. The final clinical outcomes in the ACR group were inferior to those in the LLIF group. Therefore, ACR should be left as a last resort for the cases where it is expected that an adequate correction cannot be achieved using LLIF alone. If ACR has to be performed, it is necessary to establish feasible surgical strategies to avoid mechanical failures.

Improved clinical and radiographic outcomes with expandable cages in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a propensity-matched cohort analysis.

The restoration of sufficient overall lumbar lordosis (LL) and segmental LL (SL) is associated with achieving optimal sagittal balance, decreasing back pain, and enhancing functional outcomes for patients. Expandable cages were developed in hopes of improving radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes, although current clinical evidence is inconclusive. Here, the authors aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients undergoing one- or two-level open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with expandable versus static cage placement, using propensity-matched cohorts. An institutional retrospective cohort of patients who underwent one- or two-level open TLIF with either expandable cage or static cage placement was identified. Using relevant preoperative covariates, including age, primary versus revision operation, number of cages implanted, and surgical level implanted, the authors built propensity-matched cohorts. They identified clinical outcomes in both cohorts, including operative characteristics and complication rates, along with pain, weakness, and sensory deficits over follow-up. Furthermore, they extracted and examined preoperative, postoperative, and last follow-up radiographic parameters. A total of 148 patients were included, and they were followed for a mean of 1.7 years (range 0.5-4.3 years). Propensity matching was used to create cohorts of patients who were similar with respect to age, surgical indication, revision status, number of cages implanted, surgical level implanted, and length of follow-up. Patients in both groups had similar preoperative radiographic parameters. Patients with expandable cages saw larger increases in SL, both postoperatively (5.3° ± 7.5° vs 1.6° ± 5.6°, p = 0.006) and at last follow-up (5.7° ± 7.4° vs 1.0° ± 6.1°, p = 0.003). They also saw significant improvements in pelvic incidence minus LL mismatch at last follow-up (-4.4° ± 13.2° vs 5.8° ± 13.8°, p = 0.009). No differences in intraoperative or perioperative complications were found, but patients with expandable cages were less likely to require readmission, develop adjacent-segment disease, or require revision surgery. They were also more likely to be symptom free at 1 month after surgery and at last follow-up. Expandable cages lead to better restoration of radiographic features, including SL and improvements in clinical outcomes, compared with static cages in propensity-matched cohorts in patients undergoing one- or two-level open TLIFs.

Lower urinary tract symptoms in children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: An evaluation in terms of functional level, posture, and muscle strength.

To examine factors associated with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) in children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). This cross-sectional study included 45 individuals diagnosed with DMD between the ages of 5 and 18 years. LUTS were evaluated with the Dysfunctional Voiding and Incontinence Scoring System, functional levels with the Brooke Upper Extremity Functional Classification and the Vignos Scale, lumbar lordosis angle with a bubble inclinometer, pelvic inclination angles with a digital inclinometer, and muscle strength with a hand-held dynamometer. The mean age of the children was calculated as 9.00 ± 3.32 years, body weight as 31.10 ± 12.59 kg, and height as 125.87 ± 18.46 cm. LUTD was detected in 20 children (44.44%). There was an association between high LUTD severity and low strength of the following muscles: bilateral hip flexor (Dominant: r = -0.338, p = 0.023; nondominant: r = -0.411, p = 0.005), quadriceps femoris (Dominant: r = -0.445, p = 0.002; nondominant: r = -0.504, p < 0.001), elbow flexor (Dominant: r = -0.461, p = 0.001; nondominant: r = -0.455, p = 0.002), and elbow extensor (Dominant: r = -0.442, p = 0.002; nondominant: r = -0.450, p = 0.002). Upper extremity functionality level was significantly higher in the LUTD-negative group (p = 0.004). There was no relationship between lumbar lordosis and pelvic inclination angles and LUTS symptoms (p > 0.05). To provide the adequate care for bladder health in children with DMD, it is essential to focus on parameters that will increase functionality and independence in this population.

Safe, simple, and valid position for obtaining flexion-extension radiographs to assess instability in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis: one specific instruction can make a difference.

In lumbar spondylolisthesis, conventional standing flexion-extension radiography can yield varying results depending on the patient's effort and cooperation. Previous research suggested that assisted flexion radiography provides larger flexion with a significantly greater change in lumbar lordosis (ΔLL) and increased sagittal translation (ST), posterior opening (PO), segmental angulation (SA), and instability detection rates. In this study, the authors aimed to identify a safe, simple, and valid position for obtaining functional radiographs to evaluate abnormal instability in lumbar spondylolisthesis. Consecutive patients diagnosed with L4-5 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis were included. The patients underwent upright and extension radiography and three different flexion radiography positions: conventional flexion (CF), hand-knee (HK), and hand-ankle (HA). Measurements included ΔLL, ST, PO, and SA, with instability rates compared between the three flexion techniques. This study included 117 patients (81 women, mean age of the study sample 76.8 years). The median ΔLL values were 10.8° (interquartile range [IQR] 5.2°-18.2°) in the CF position, 30.0° (IQR 21.0°-41.1°) in the HK position, and 32.1° (IQR 23.0°-42.4°) in the HA position, with significant differences noted (p < 0.05). For PO and SA, significant differences were observed between the techniques (p < 0.05). ST medians were CF 5.5% (IQR 3.6%-8.1%), HK 9.5% (IQR 7.7%-11.1%), and HA 9.7% (IQR 7.4%-11.4%), with HK and HA positions differing significantly from the CF position (p < 0.001), but not the HK from the HA position (p = 0.15). Instability detection rates were 29.1% in the CF position, 76.1% in the HK position, and 76.9% in the HA position, with significant differences between the HK, HA, and CF positions (p < 0.001), but not between the HK and HA positions (p > 0.99). The study showed that HK and HA flexion radiographs provided greater ΔLL, ST, PO, SA, and better instability detection than the CF position. Given its safety and simplicity, the HK position is suitable for detecting abnormal lumbar mobility in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Short-Segment Fusion vs. Isolated Decompression in Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis Patients with Cobb Angles Over 20 Degrees

Background ContextLumbar decompression and short-segment lumbar fusion are standard procedures for short-segment lumbar canal stenosis, even in patients with moderate Cobb angles. Adult degenerative scoliosis is diagnosed at a threshold of 10 degrees, and patients with coronal Cobb angles over 30 degrees are recommended for long fusion due to global spinal deformity. However, there is a lack of research on clinical outcomes in patients with moderate coronal deformity, such as Cobb angles between 20 and 30 degrees. PurposeThis study aims to investigate the radiographic and clinical outcome differences between isolated decompression and short-segment interbody fusion for lumbar spinal canal stenosis in patients with moderate coronal deformity. Study DesignA retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected registry Patient SamplePatients with Cobb angle exceeding 20 degrees who underwent 1- or 2- levels of lumbar surgery for lumbar canal stenosis. Patients diagnosed as spinal deformity were excluded. Outcome MeasuresPatient-reported outcomes included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), VAS back, VAS leg, Short Form 12 Physical Component Score (SF-12 PCS) and Mental Component Score (SF-12 MCS), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) at preoperative, 12-week postoperative, and 1-year postoperative timepoints. Preoperative and postoperative spinopelvic alignment was assessed using Cobb angle, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis and PI minus LL. MethodsA propensity score-matched analysis with the overlap weighting was utilized to investigate patient-reported outcomes at 12-week and 1-year postoperatively between the surgery groups. Spinopelvic alignments were compared between preoperative and 1-year postoperative timepoint using a linear mixed-effect model. ResultsBefore overlap weighting, the two surgery groups showed significant differences in age and diagnosis. No obvious sagittal malalignment was observed (decompression, 7.4° vs. fusion, 11.5°). After propensity score weighting, the fusion groups exhibited significantly better ODI and VAS back at the 1-year timepoint (ODI: fusion, 16.6 vs. decompression, 28.1, P=0.013; VAS back: fusion, 1.5 ± 2.1 vs. decompression, 3.7 ± 1.9, P<0.001). Radiographic assessment showed that the fusion group achieved better PI minus LL compared to decompression group (15° vs. 10°, P=0.008) ConclusionIn patients with degenerative scoliosis and a Cobb angle greater than 20 degrees, short-segment lumbar fusion surgery may result in enhanced improvement for short-segment lumbar pathology compared to isolated decompression.

Proximal lumbar anterior column realignment for iatrogenic sagittal plane adult spinal deformity correction: a retrospective case series

Anterior column realignment (ACR) is a powerful minimally invasive surgery (MIS) technique to restore sagittal alignment in adult spinal deformity (ASD). This can accomplish similar segmental lordosis restoration as 3-column osteotomy with less blood loss and comparable complication rates. ACR can be performed at adjacent disease segments in the proximal lumbar spine in revision cases. However, two-thirds of physiologic lordosis occurs between L4-S1, and concerns remain about altered lumbar morphology. We evaluated patients who underwent proximal lumbar ACR for iatrogenic flatback deformity. A total of 19 consecutive patients who underwent L1-2 or L2-3 ACR were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were treated with lateral MIS interbody technique, followed by posterior reconstruction with Smith-Peterson osteotomy (SPO). Pre- and post-operative radiographic and clinical outcomes were obtained. Mean follow-up was 19-months. All but one patient had a history of prior lumbar or lumbo-sacral fusion. SVA and PI-LL decreased from 11.9 cm to 6.1 cm (p<0.0001) and 34.2° to 12.8° (p<0.0001). Segmental lordosis increased from -2.7° to 21.9° (p<0.0001). Proximal lumbar lordosis (PLL) increased from -0.4° to 22.6° (p<0.0001), and lordosis distribution index (LDI) decreased from 79.5% to 48.9% (p<0.0001). Mean ODI and NPRS back pain decreased from 58.0 to 36.2 (p=0.0041) and 7.9 to 3.4 (p<0.0001). PROMIS-10 Physical and Mental Health T-scores increased from 34.1 to 43.3 (p=0.0049) and 40.4 to 45.0 (p=0.0993). Major complication rate was 15.8%. One patient required revision for mechanical failure. There were no permanent neurological or vascular injuries. Proximal lumbar ACR plus SPO can achieve sagittal correction with low major complication rates in patients with ASD and prior distal fusion. Differentially increasing PLL and lowering LDI did not have deleterious effects on radiographic or clinical outcomes. Further work is needed to understand the effect of proximal ACR in the surgical management of ASD.

Changes in spinal curve during dentistry studies measured with a Spinal Mouse device: A five-year prospective study.

Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) often arise and develop during dentistry studies. The most affected regions are related to the spine. Possible associations between spinal curve parameters and MSDs have not yet been investigated amongst dentistry students. This longitudinal observational study aimed to determine whether spinal curve changes during dentistry studies, analyse the relationship between objective findings and subjectively declared MSDs and compare spinal curve parameters with those published in the literature. Seventy-three dentistry students answered a questionnaire on MSDs, and were examined using the Spinal Mouse® device at the beginning, in the middle, and at the end of their 5-year study. The spinal curve exhibited a gender diversity in the lumbar lordosis angle, sacrum inclination, and thoracolumbar ratio. From the first to fifth study year, we observed an increase in the range of motions in the sagittal and frontal planes, an increase in the maximal extent of right lateral inclination, and a decrease in maximal left lateral inclination. Whole-spine backward inclination increased only in women, and forward sacral inclination decreased. No statistically significant relationships were found between the objective findings and subjectively declared MSDs. The spinal curve shape differed between men and women and changed during dentistry studies. No objective markers or predictors of MSDs were found amongst the dentistry students. These findings can serve as a benchmark for further studies on the association between MSDs and objective findings.