Lumbar Developmental Spinal Stenosis Research Articles

Postlaminectomy lumbopelvic sagittal changes in patients with developmental lumbar spinal stenosis grouped into Roussouly lumbopelvic sagittal profiles: 2- to 10-year prospective follow-up.

Roussouly lumbopelvic sagittal profiles are associated with distinct pathologies or distinct natural histories and prognoses. The associations between developmental lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) and native lumbopelvic sagittal profiles are unknown. Moreover, the relative effects of multilevel decompression on lumbar sagittal alignment, geometrical parameters of the pelvis, and compensatory mechanisms for each of the Roussouly subtypes are unknown. This study aimed to explore the association between DLSS and native lumbar lordosis (LL) subtypes. It also attempts to understand the natural history of postlaminectomy lumbopelvic sagittal changes and compensatory mechanisms for each of the Roussouly subtypes and to define the critical lumbar segment or specific lordosis arc that is recruited after relief of the stenosis effect. A total of 418 patients with multilevel DLSS were grouped into various Roussouly subtypes, and lumbopelvic sagittal parameters were prospectively compared at follow-up intervals of preoperative to < 2 years, 2 to < 5 years, and 5 to ≥ 10 years after laminectomy. The variables analyzed included LL, upper lordosis arc from L1 to L4, lower lordosis arc from L4 to S1, and segmental lordosis from L1 to S1. Pelvic parameters included pelvic incidence, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, and pelvic incidence minus LL values. Of the 329 patients who were followed up throughout this study, 33.7% had Roussouly type 1 native lordosis, whereas the incidence rates of types 2, 3, and 4 were 33.4%, 21.9%, and 10.9%, respectively. LL was not reduced in any of the Roussouly subtypes after multilevel decompressions. Instead, LL increased by 4.5° (SD 11.9°-from 27.3° [SD 11.5°] to 31.8° [SD 9.8°]) in Roussouly type 1 and by 3.1° (SD 11.6°-from 41.3° [SD 9.5°] to 44.4° [SD = 9.7°]) in Roussouly type 2. The other Roussouly types showed no significant changes. Pelvic tilt decreased significantly-by 2.8°, whereas sacral slope increased significantly-by 2.9° in Roussouly type 1 and by 1.7° in Roussouly type 2. The critical lumbar segment that recruits LL differs between Roussouly subtypes. Increments and changes were sustained until the final follow-up. The study findings are important in predicting patient prognosis, LL evolution, and the need for prophylactic or corrective deformity surgery. Multilevel involvement in DLSS and the high prevalence of Roussouly types 1 and 2 suggest that spinal canal dimensions are closely linked to the developmental evolution of LL.

The profile of the spinal column in subjects with lumbar developmental spinal stenosis.

The aim of this study was to determine the differences in spinal imaging characteristics between subjects with or without lumbar developmental spinal stenosis (DSS) in a population-based cohort. This was a radiological analysis of 2,387 participants who underwent L1-S1 MRI. Means and ranges were calculated for age, sex, BMI, and MRI measurements. Anteroposterior (AP) vertebral canal diameters were used to differentiate those with DSS from controls. Other imaging parameters included vertebral body dimensions, spinal canal dimensions, disc degeneration scores, and facet joint orientation. Mann-Whitney U and chi-squared tests were conducted to search for measurement differences between those with DSS and controls. In order to identify possible associations between DSS and MRI parameters, those who were statistically significant in the univariate binary logistic regression were included in a multivariate stepwise logistic regression after adjusting for demographics. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported where appropriate. Axial AP vertebral canal diameter (p < 0.001), interpedicular distance (p < 0.001), AP dural sac diameter (p < 0.001), lamina angle (p < 0.001), and sagittal mid-vertebral body height (p < 0.001) were significantly different between those identified as having DSS and controls. Narrower interpedicular distance (OR 0.745 (95% CI 0.618 to 0.900); p = 0.002) and AP dural sac diameter (OR 0.506 (95% CI 0.400 to 0.641); p < 0.001) were associated with DSS. Lamina angle (OR 1.127 (95% CI 1.045 to 1.214); p = 0.002) and right facet joint angulation (OR 0.022 (95% CI 0.002 to 0.247); p = 0.002) were also associated with DSS. No association was observed between disc parameters and DSS. From this large-scale cohort, the canal size is found to be independent of body stature. Other than spinal canal dimensions, abnormal orientations of lamina angle and facet joint angulation may also be a result of developmental variations, leading to increased likelihood of DSS. Other skeletal parameters are spared. There was no relationship between DSS and soft tissue changes of the spinal column, which suggests that DSS is a unique result of bony maldevelopment. These findings require validation in other ethnicities and populations. Level of Evidence: I (diagnostic study) Cite this article: Bone Joint J2021;103-B(4):725-733.

Modified minimally invasive-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under microscopic view to achieve bilateral decompression and fusion through a single approach to treat developmental lumbar spinal stenosis

PurposeTo describe a modified minimally invasive spine (MIS) procedure to treat lumbar developmental spinal stenosis (DSS) to achieve complete decompression and fusion. The method preserves the muscles, ligaments, and most of the bony structures. DSS is not considered a good indication for MIS procedures and few reports discuss alternative treatments. Because MIS has the advantages of low blood loss, rapid recovery, and short hospital stay, it would be ideal for DSS. MethodsAfter confirming the screw positions, we placed a tube retractor in the facet joint on the decompressed side. The inferior facet joint and part of the superior joint of the lower segment were removed, the spinal canal was carefully exposed under a microscopic view, and fusion was performed through Kambin’s triangle. Next, the operation table was rotated to the contralateral side and angled to approximately 15–20 degrees. We then tilted the tube retractor in the facet joint toward the operation side by 15–20 degrees, which provided access to the contralateral canal for decompression. The ligament flavum was carefully removed and the dural sac was gently retracted to expose the lateral recess on the other side. We then examined the nerve root on the contralateral side to ensure there was no compression. ResultsEight patients with lumbar DSS were treated using this method. Patients' neurological symptoms improved greatly without complications and patients were able to walk the day after surgery. The inner plate of the contralateral lamina and muscle as well as most of the ligaments that contribute to stability were preserved. ConclusionThis modified MIS decompression procedure successfully treated DSS by providing spinal canal decompression and preserving most of the stabilizing structures.

Clinical implications of lumbar developmental spinal stenosis on back pain, radicular leg pain, and disability.

To study the associations of lumbar developmental spinal stenosis (DSS) with low back pain (LBP), radicular leg pain, and disability. This was a cross-sectional study of 2,206 subjects along with L1-S1 axial and sagittal MRI. Clinical and radiological information regarding their demographics, workload, smoking habits, anteroposterior (AP) vertebral canal diameter, spondylolisthesis, and MRI changes were evaluated. Mann-Whitney U tests and chi-squared tests were conducted to search for differences between subjects with and without DSS. Associations of LBP and radicular pain reported within one month (30 days) and one year (365 days) of the MRI, with clinical and radiological information, were also investigated by utilizing univariate and multivariate logistic regressions. Subjects with DSS had higher prevalence of radicular leg pain, more pain-related disability, and lower quality of life (all p < 0.05). Subjects with DSS had 1.5 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0 to 2.1; p = 0.027) and 1.8 (95% CI 1.3 to 2.6; p = 0.001) times higher odds of having radicular leg pain in the past month and the past year, respectively. However, DSS was not associated with LBP. Although, subjects with a spondylolisthesis had 1.7 (95% CI 1.1 to 2.5; p = 0.011) and 2.0 (95% CI 1.2 to 3.2; p = 0.008) times greater odds to experience LBP in the past month and the past year, respectively. This large-scale study identified DSS as a risk factor of acute and chronic radicular leg pain. DSS was seen in 6.9% of the study cohort and these patients had narrower spinal canals. Subjects with DSS had earlier onset of symptoms, more severe radicular leg pain, which lasted for longer and were more likely to have worse disability and poorer quality of life. In these patients there is an increased likelihood of nerve root compression due to a pre-existing narrowed canal, which is important when planning surgery as patients are likely to require multi-level decompression surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(1):131-140.

Prevalence and Definition of Multilevel Lumbar Developmental Spinal Stenosis.

Study Design:Cross-sectional study.Objectives:To define multilevel lumbar developmental spinal stenosis (DSS) using a composite score model and to determine its prevalence.Methods:This was a cohort study of 2385 openly recruited subjects with lumbosacral (L1-S1) MRIs. All subjects with previous spinal surgery or spinal deformities were excluded. The anteroposterior (AP) vertebral canal diameter was measured by two independent observers. Any associations between level-specific vertebral canal diameter and subject body habitus were analysed with non-parametric tests. Three or more stenotic levels, equivalent to a composite score of 3 or more, were considered as multilevel DSS. The median values of these subjects’ AP canal diameters were used to construct the multilevel DSS values. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was utilized to determine the ability of these cut-off values to screen for DSS by presenting their area under curve, sensitivity and specificity.Results:Subject body habitus was poorly correlated with AP vertebral canal diameter. Multilevel DSS was identified as L1<19 mm, L2<19 mm, L3<18 mm, L4<18 mm, L5<18 mm, S1<16 mm with 81%–96% sensitivity and 72%–91% specificity. The prevalence of multilevel DSS in this cohort was 7.3%.Conclusions:Utilizing a large homogeneous cohort, the prevalence of multilevel DSS is determined. Our cut-offs provide high diagnostic accuracy. Patients with multiple levels that fulfil these criteria may be at-risk of spinal canal compressions at multiple sites.Level of Evidence:III

Pedigree analysis of lumbar developmental spinal stenosis: Determination of potential inheritance patterns.

Lumbar developmental spinal stenosis (DSS) refers to multilevel pre-existing narrowed spinal canals, which predisposeto neural compromise. The objective of this study is to identify any inheritance pattern of DSS by utilizing pedigree charts. This was a case series of 13 families with a total of 80 subjects having magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) from L1 to S1. Cases (subjects with DSS) or controls (subjects without DSS) were identified by measuring their anteroposterior (AP) vertebral canal diameters. Multilevel model analyses were also performed to evaluate whether there is substantial clustering of observations within the families, and the effect of multilevel DSS. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Akaike information criteria (AIC) were compared between models. Correlations between subject demographics and AP vertebral canal diameter were statistically insignificant at all levels. Only vertebral canal cross-sectional area, and axial and sagittal vertebral canal diameter were found to be statistically different between cases and controls at all levels (all p < .05). Both males and females were affected by DSS and there was no skipping of generation, which highly suggested DSS followed an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern. After accounting for multilevel DSS, there was a drop of more than 10 in AIC and some variances were also explained within families. This is the first study that suggests multilevel lumbar DSS to have an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern. Within families with a background of DSS, subjects had a smaller canal size, contributed by shortened axial and sagittal AP vertebral canal diameter, and smaller canal cross-sectional area.

A systematic review of developmental lumbar spinal stenosis.

To systematically evaluate any consensus for the etiology, definition, presentation and outcomes of developmental lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS). A comprehensive literature search was undertaken by 2 independent reviewers with PubMed, Ovid, and Web of Science to identify all published knowledge on DLSS. Search terms included "developmental spinal stenosis" or "congenital spinal stenosis" and "lumbar". The inclusion criteria were English clinical studies with sample size larger than 8, articles examining the etiology, diagnostic criteria, surgical outcomes of DLSS, and its association with other spinal pathologies. Articles that did not specify a developmental component were excluded. The GRADE approach was used to assess their quality of evidence. The initial database review found 404 articles. Twenty articles with moderate to very low quality met the inclusion criteria for analysis. The bony canal diameter was significantly shorter in patients with DLSS than normal subjects. In addition, the risk of re-operation on adjacent levels (21.7%) was high which could be explained by multi-level stenosis. However, there was a lack of consensus on the methodology of diagnosing DLSS and on its specific surgical techniques. Multi-level stenosis and re-operation at adjacent levels are especially common with DLSS. Identification of these individuals provides better prognostication after surgery. However, current literature provides few consensus on its definition and the required surgical approach. Besides, there are limited reports of its etiology and association with other spinal pathologies. Due to these limitations, standardizing the definition of DLSS and investigating its etiology and expected clinical course are necessary.

Automatic Lumbar Spinal CT Image Segmentation With a Dual Densely Connected U-Net

The clinical treatment of degenerative and developmental lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is different. Computed tomography (CT) is helpful in distinguishing degenerative and developmental LSS due to its advantage in imaging osseous and calcified tissues. However, boundaries of the vertebral body, spinal canal and dural sac have low contrast and are hard to identify in a CT image, so the diagnosis depends heavily on the knowledge of expert surgeons and radiologists. In this paper, we develop an automatic lumbar spinal CT image segmentation method to assist LSS diagnosis. The main contributions of this paper are as follows: 1) a new lumbar spinal CT image dataset is constructed that contains 2393 axial CT images collected from 279 patients, with the ground truth of pixel-level segmentation labels; 2) a dual densely connected U-shaped neural network (DDU-Net) is used to segment the spinal canal, dural sac and vertebral body in an end-to-end manner; 3) DDU-Net is capable of segmenting tissues with large scale-variant, inconspicuous edges (e.g., spinal canal) and extremely small size (e.g., dural sac); and 4) DDU-Net is practical, requiring no image preprocessing such as contrast enhancement, registration and denoising, and the running time reaches 12 FPS. In the experiment, we achieved state-of-the-art performance on the lumbar spinal image segmentation task. We expect that the technique will increase both radiology workflow efficiency and the perceived value of radiology reports for referring clinicians and patients.

Etiology of developmental spinal stenosis: A genome-wide association study.

Our study aimed to identify possible single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) via a genome-wide association study (GWAS) approach and a candidate gene platform that were associated with lumbar developmental spinal stenosis (DSS). Southern Chinese population-based study volunteers were assessed (age range: 18-55 years). DSS was defined as the anteroposterior bony spinal canal diameter on T1-weighted axial MRI of L1 to S1. Genotyping was performed using the Illumina HumanOmniZhongHua-8 BeadChip. Using the canal diameter as the quantitative trait, genomic statistical analyses was performed. A total of 469 subjects were recruited. The mean axial AP measurements noted were: L1: 21.8 mm, L2: 21.9 mm, L3: 22.4 mm, L4: 20.2 mm, L5: 19.6 mm, and S1: 17.3 mm. Q-Q plots of genome-wide associations found significant differences in L4 and L5 measurements. More significant SNPs were found on chromosomes 8, 11, and 18. Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 on chromosome 11 was found to be an important functional gene in canal bony development via candidate gene approach. We found two clusters in the findings with one including the upper levels (L1-L4) and the other the lower levels (L5 and S1). This is the first GWAS addressing DSS. The presence of multiple SNPs suggests a multi-factorial origin of DSS. Further analyses noted region-specific genetic predisposition, delineating distinct upper to lower lumbar regions of DSS. With better understanding of the DSS phenotype and genetic markers, the at-risk population can be identified early, preventative measures can be initiated, lifestyle/activity modification can be implemented, and more novel and precision-based therapeutics can be developed. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:1262-1268, 2018.

Radiographic indices for lumbar developmental spinal stenosis

BackgroundPatients with developmental spinal stenosis (DSS) are susceptible to developing symptomatic stenosis due to pre-existing narrowed spinal canals. DSS has been previously defined by MRI via the axial anteroposterior (AP) bony spinal canal diameter. However, MRI is hardly a cost-efficient tool for screening patients. X-rays are superior due to its availability and cost, but currently, there is no definition of DSS based on plain radiographs. Thus, the aim of this study is to develop radiographic indices for diagnosing DSS.MethodsThis was a prospective cohort of 148 subjects consisting of patients undergoing surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (patient group) and asymptomatic subjects recruited openly from the general population (control group). Ethics approval was obtained from the local institutional review board. All subjects underwent MRI for diagnosing DSS and radiographs for measuring parameters used for creating the indices. All measurements were performed by two independent investigators, blinded to patient details. Intra- and interobserver reliability analyses were conducted, and only parameters with near perfect intraclass correlation underwent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to determine the cutoff values for diagnosing DSS using radiographs.ResultsImaging parameters from a total of 66 subjects from the patient group and 82 asymptomatic subjects in the control group were used for analysis. ROC analysis suggested sagittal vertebral body width to pedicle width ratio (SBW:PW) as having the strongest sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing DSS. Cutoff indices for SBW:PW were level-specific: L1 (2.0), L2 (2.0), L3 (2.2), L4 (2.2), L5 (2.5), and S1 (2.8).ConclusionsThis is the first study to define DSS on plain radiographs based on comparisons between a clinically relevant patient group and a control group. Individuals with DSS can be identified by a simple radiograph using a screening tool allowing for better cost-saving means for clinical diagnosis or research purposes.

The paradoxicalrelationship between ligamentum flavum hypertrophy and developmental lumbar spinal stenosis.

BackgroundLigamentum flavum (LF) hypertrophy is a common cause of lumbar spinal stenosis and is thought to be degeneration-driven. Developmental spinal stenosis (DSS) is characterized by pre-existing narrowed spinal canals and is likely a developmental problem that occurs in childhood. In these cases, the LF may demonstrate different characteristics as compared to degeneration-driven stenosis. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between histological changes of LF and canal size.MethodsPatients who had surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis were prospectively recruited and divided into three groups (critical DSS, relative DSS and non-DSS) based on previously defined anteroposterior bony spinal canal diameter measurements on MRI. The degree of disc degeneration and LF thickness were also measured from L1 to S1. Surgical LF specimens were retrieved for histological assessment of fibrotic grade and area of fibrosis.ResultsA total of 19 females and 15 males (110 LF specimens) with an overall mean age of 65.9 years (SD ± 9.8 years) were recruited. DSS was found to have a significant negative correlation (p < 0.001) with LF thickness, its fibrotic grade and area of fibrosis (%). Non-DSS exhibited a significant positive relationship with the degree of LF fibrosis. Disc degeneration and LF thickness had no correlation with LF histology.ConclusionsOur study is the first to definitively note that degeneration is the cause of LF fibrosis in non-DSS patients; however, in contrast, an inverse relationship exists between canal size and LF fibrosis in DSS patients, suggesting a different pathomechanism. Hence, despite a similar degree of LF thickness, DSS patients have LF with less fibrosis compared with non-DSS patients. Further investigation of the cause of LF changes in DSS is necessary to understand this relationship.

Anatomic radiological variations in developmental lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective, control-matched comparative analysis

Background contextDevelopmental lumbar spinal stenosis is a maldevelopment of the dorsal spinal elements involving short pedicles and a trefoil bony spinal canal that increases the likelihood of neural compression at an earlier age. PurposeTo identify radiographically the anatomic variations caused by the maldevelopment of the infrequently characterized dorsal spinal elements. Study designA prospective, control-matched comparative analysis. MethodsMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and anteroposterior (AP) plain radiographs of 66 patients (mean age, 40.7 years) selected and randomized prospectively and compared with images of 45, age- and gender-matched control subjects. Variables assessed included spinal canal cross-sectional area (CSA), thecal sac AP and transverse canal diameters (CSA), and interpedicular distance. All were expressed in ratios with vertebral body diameter (VBD), interlaminar angle, stenosis grade, and MRI evidence of disc degeneration. ResultsIn the stenosis cohort, global pathology and multilevel involvement with L3, L4, and L5 segments were involved more commonly and severely. Severe stenosis, at L1, L2, and S1 occurs infrequently. Multivariate analysis demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in spinal canal CSA-to-vertebral body CSA ratio, AP spinal canal diameter-to-VBD ratio on axial and sagittal magnetic resonance images, and plain radiograph interpedicular distance-to-VBD ratio at all levels. Interlaminar angle and the transverse spinal canal diameter-to-VBD ratio were reduced significantly in the stenosed cohort at all levels, except L1. No statistically significant difference regarding the incidence of disc degeneration on MRI between the two cohorts, as well as thecal sac CSA-to-spinal canal CSA ratios across all levels were observed, except for L3 and S1 (p<.05). ConclusionsThree spinal canal morphologies were identified: (1) “flattened” canal with predominantly reduced spinal canal AP diameter, (2) spinal canal with predominantly reduced interlaminar angle, and (3) global reduction of all canal parameters. Early age at presentation and subtle spondylosis, although typical, should not be considered the identifying, differentiating factors.

The Relationship Between Developmental Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and its BMD Value: Comparison by Single Energy Quantitative CT

The Relationship Between Developmental Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and its BMD Value: Comparison by Single Energy Quantitative CT

Lumbar spinal stenosis: the clinical spectrum and the results of operation.

Thirty-one patients who had been treated surgically for lumbar spinal stenosis between 1968 and 1978 at the Norfolk and Norwich Hospital have been personally reviewed. In 28 patients (90 per cent) degenerative change in the lumbar spine had been the principal aetiological factor; the other three had idiopathic developmental lumbar spinal stenosis. In 17 patients (55 per cent) the result was classified as good, although a total of 26 patients (84 per cent) were satisfied. In patients with degenerative changes, one important reason for failure was inadequate decompression; re-operation in this group seemed worthwhile. The good results of operation for lumbar spinal stenosis were characterised by rapid resolution of pain in the leg.