Abstract Purpose: The tear film in subjects with ocular dryness is often unstable and incapable of maintaining the protective qualities that are intrinsic to its structure and function. Until recently, lubricating eye drops have provided only transient relief from ocular dryness. The purpose of these studies is to determine if a lubricating eye drop, containing PG/PEG/HP‐Guar, will extend ocular protection. Methods: To compare the ocular residence time of lubricating eye drops, subjects with dry feeling eyes were administered a solution of Fluoroscein Isothiocyanate‐dextran mixed with a the eye drops. The residence time was measured by a scanning fluorometer. To compare TFBUT, subjects with moderately dry feeling eyes were administered a single drop of a lubricating eye drop. After instillation, TFBUT was measured at 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45, 60, and 90 minutes. Results: Tear film retention of the PG/PEG/HP‐Guar product was significantly greater than a HPMC and a CMC lubricating eye drop. The product containing PG/PEG/HP‐Guar was measured in the tear film as much as 37 minutes post instillation, while the HPMC and CMC drops were only 25 and 23 minutes, respectively. The PG/PEG/HP‐Guar tear yielded a significantly greater increase in TFBUT from baseline at 45, 60, and 90 minutes post‐installation compared to eyes dosed with a CMC/Glycerin drop. Conclusions: Based on these results, it can be postulated that the extended duration of retention observed with the PG/PEG/HP‐Guar tear allows the necessary time for restructuring of the unstable tear film into a more stable tear film. This leads to a long‐term tear film stabilization and enhancement of TFBUT and ultimately, extended ocular surface protection