Relief Of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Research Articles

Prostate Artery Embolization (PAE) with Small Beads for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH).

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) is the most frequent cause of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTSs) in elderly populations. Minimally invasive treatments of BPH are safe and effective and are gaining popularity among both professionals and patients. Prostate Artery Embolization (PAE) has proven to be effective in Trans-Urethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) in terms of prostate volume reduction and LUTS relief. PAE entails the selective catheterization of the prostatic artery and later embolization of distal vessels with beads of various calibers. Universal consensus regarding the ideal particle size is yet to be defined. We retrospectively evaluated 24 consecutive patients (median age: 75 years; range: 59-86 years) treated with PAE at our institution from October 2015 to November 2022. Particles of different sizes were employed; 12 patients were treated with 40-120 µm particles, 5 with 100 µm, 5 with 100-300 µm and 2 with 250 µm. Technical success, defined as selective prostate artery catheterization and controlled release of embolizing beads, was achieved in all patients. Removal vs. retention of the urinary catheter at the first post-procedural urological visit was the main clinical objective. No major peri-procedural complications were recorded, with 56% of patients successfully removing the urinary catheter.

Transperineal Laser Ablation for Benign Prostatic Enlargement: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Pilot Studies.

Transperineal laser ablation (TPLA) of the prostate is a new minimally invasive treatment option in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the efficacy and safety of TPLA in the management of BPE. The primary outcomes were the improvement in urodynamic parameters (maximum urinary flow (Qmax) and postvoiding residue (PVR)) and LUTS relief, assessed using the IPSS questionnaire. The secondary outcomes were the preservation of sexual and ejaculatory functions, assessed with the IEEF-5 and MSHQ-EjD questionnaires, respectively, and rates of postoperative complications. We reviewed the literature for prospective or retrospective studies evaluating the use of TPLA in the treatment of BPE. A comprehensive search in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed for English language articles published between January 2000 and June 2022. Pooled analysis of the included studies with available follow-up data for the outcomes of interest was additionally performed. After screening 49 records, six full-text manuscripts were identified, including two retrospective and four prospective non-comparative studies. Overall, 297 patients were included. All the studies independently reported a statistically significant improvement, from baseline, in Qmax, PVR, and IPSS score at each timepoint. Three studies additionally demonstrated that TPLA did not affect sexual function, reporting no change in the IEEF-5 score, and a statistically significant improvement in MSHQ-EjD score at each timepoint. Low rates of complications were recorded in all the included studies. Pooled analysis showed a clinically meaningful improvement in both micturition and sexual outcomes mean values at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up, compared with baseline. Transperineal laser ablation of the prostate for the treatment of BPE showed interesting results in pilot studies. However, higher level and comparative studies are needed to confirm its efficacy in relieving obstructive symptoms and preserving sexual function.

SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF SILODOSIN-DUTASTERIDE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF BENIGNPROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA

Background Information: Currently alpha1-adrenoreceptor blockers with the combination of 5- alpha reductase inhibitors are widely used as first-line therapy to improve Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). Aims And Objectives:The aim of this study was to evaluate the Efficacy of combination drug Silodosin and Dutasteride in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia patients with mild to severe symptoms. Materials And Methods:Thepresent hospital based Prospective Interventional Observational study was conducted in Department of Urology and Surgery out and inpatient Department,Lalitha Super Speciality Hospital during the time period of 1st October 2020 to 31st March 2021 and 70 cases of BPH with mild to severe symptoms and prostate volume of greater than30cc were included in the study All the patients were administered the drug which is a combination of Silodosin (8mg) and Dutasteride (0.5mg) once daily for 3 months after obtaining ethical clearance and administering informed consent .The patients condition was done followupfor the changes in Prostate Size,PVR,IPSS which were recorded and analysed using appropriate statistical tools. Results: The study showed that there was a significant decrease in prostate size when compared with before treatment i.e.11.31±5.99and a significant decrease in PostVoidResidual volume when compared with before treatment i.e 43.95±1.091.During therapy the IPSS score was improved to 9.5±1.567 which was found to be statistically significant (p<0.05).After 2 months of the treatment there was improvement in the patient condition ,as we saw the significant change in prostate size, post void residual volume and IPSS score after treatment.The patient with severe, moderateand mild benign prostate hyperplasia was improved by the treatment . Conclusion: There is statistically significant improvement in PVR ,IPSS and prostate size .Thus Silodosin 8mg and dutasteride 0.5mg can be used for effective relief of LUTS caused due to BPH in mild to severe cases.

Nowoczesna terapia skojarzona tadalafilem i tamsulozyną jako schemat leczenia u mężczyzn z objawami ze strony dolnych dróg moczowych

Based on the available scientific research, tadalafil administered daily at a dose of 5 mg is safe and effective in the treatment of men with lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile dysfunction, compared to placebo or tamsulosin alone. The combination of 5 mg tadalafil and 0.4 mg tamsulosin daily allows for a better lower urinary tract symptoms improvement compared to monotherapy drugs, even with an increased, but acceptable and tolerable side effects. When tamsulosin or tadalafil is discontinued, lower urinary tract symptoms are significantly worsened compared to baseline in patients previously treated with combination therapy. Tadalafil 5 mg should be considered as one of the primary treatment options in lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia and erectile dysfunction patients as it has an excellent tolerability, safety, and efficacy profile, both as monotherapy and in combination with 0.4 mg tamsulosin. Better effectiveness in alleviating lower urinary tract symptoms was observed with combination therapy while maintaining sexual function. Continuing to switch to monotherapy maintains lower urinary tract symptoms relief, but only tadalafil is able to maintain erectile dysfunction improvement. Our results support evidence of an increasingly tailored and modular lower urinary tract symptoms treatment.

Prostatic Artery Embolization to Achieve Freedom from Catheterization in Patients with Acute Urinary Retention Caused by Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

PurposeTo determine the ability of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) to achieve freedom from catheterization in patients with acute urinary retention (AUR) caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Materials and MethodsThis retrospective single-center study was performed between June 2014 and March 2019 in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) caused by BPH. PAE was performed in 154 eligible patients, of which 76 suffered from spontaneous AUR and had indwelling catheters placed and kept until the procedure, owing to clinical failure in the removal of the previous intermittent catheter. Each patient was followed for at least 12 months. The first trial without catheter was performed 3 days after PAE. Successful catheter removal within the first 30 days after PAE was considered a clinical success. The rate of patients free from catheterization, LUTS relief, prostate volume, and adverse events was recorded. ResultsClinical success was achieved in 70 (92.1%) patients. The rates of freedom from catheterization were 90.3% (65/72), 83.3% (60/72), and 80.6% (58/72) at 3-, 6-, and 12-months follow-up, respectively. The median elapsed time from PAE to catheter removal was 10 days. However, 18 patients needed further interventions. Symptom scores revealed a continuous improvement in urinary symptoms. The mean prostate volume showed a statistically significant decrease at 3 and 12 months compared with its baseline value. No severe adverse events occurred. ConclusionsPAE can achieve freedom from catheterization in patients with AUR caused by BPH.

Reasons to go for Rezūm steam therapy: an effective and durable outpatient minimally invasive procedure.

In this review, we will discuss the state of the literature regarding Rezūm and opportunities for its application in the treatment of BPH. A comprehensive review of original research on convective water vapor thermal therapy (Rezūm) was conducted. Articles related to transurethral resection of the prostate, holmium laser enucleation of the prostate, Aquablation, and greenlight photoselective vaporization of the prostate were reviewed for discussion. Rezūm distinguishes itself from other treatment options by its durable improvement in objective clinical outcomes such as IPSS and BPH Impact Index, while being cost-effective and versatile in its ability to treat a variety of prostate gland morphologies. This treatment option shows good lower urinary tract symptom relief, especially in small-to-moderate prostate sizes (30-80cc). The use of convective heat transfer is unique and allows for localized treatment, avoiding damage to surrounding structures, thus providing an excellent safety profile and sexual function preservation. The current evidence on Rezūm warrants its consideration as a therapeutic alternative to transurethral surgery in selected patients.

Ejaculation Sparing Bladder Neck Incision with Holmium Laser in Patients with Urinary Symptoms and Small Prostates: Short-Term Functional Results

Background: The treatment options for male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) widely range from self-monitoring to oral medications to surgical procedures. As far as concerns surgical treatment of obstructive LUTS, transurethral incision of the prostate is considered as the gold standard in patients with mild benign prostatic enlargement. Objectives: The aim of our study is to describe this novel approach to perform ejaculation sparing Holmium laser bladder neck incision (ES-HoBNI), with particular regard to its effect on ejaculation and LUTS relief. Methods: We evaluated prospective clinical data from 143 consecutive patients who underwent ES-HoBNI at our institution from January 2012 to February 2018. Procedures were performed with a continuous flow 26 Ch resectoscope and a 550 µm holmium laser end-fire fiber. The stenotic bladder neck was deeply incised at 3 and 9’o clock down to the prostatic capsule in a retrograde direction to either side in front of the veromontanum. Results: Median Qmax, postvoid residual volume, International Prostate Symptom Score, and quality of life were 9 mL/s (7.4–10.2), 130 mL (100–190), 15 (13–19), and 3 (2–4), respectively. In total, 110 (76.9) reported regular anterograde ejaculation. Median operative time was 20 min (15–26). Median catheterization time and hospital stay were 3 days (3–4) and 22 h (20–24), respectively. Moreover, we have compared the frequency of anterograde ejaculation, which slightly increases after ES-HoBNI (77 vs. 81.2%) when compared to baseline data, despite not reaching statistical significancy. Conclusions: ES-HoBNI is a safe, reproducible technique to relieve obstructive LUTS in men with small prostates while preserving ejaculation in younger and sexually active individuals.

Monopolar Transurethral Enucleation of Prostatic Adenoma: Preliminary Report

To describe preliminary results of our monopolar transurethral enucleation of prostatic adenoma (mTUEPA). A consecutive series of male patients treated with mTUEPA, a retrograde enucleation of the prostatic adenoma performed by means of a standard monopolar resectoscope, were prospectively enrolled. Symptoms, uroflowmetry parameters, and post-voiding residual were assessed at baseline and at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Prostate volume was evaluated at baseline by means of transrectal ultrasound. Antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs were stopped at least 1 week before the operation. Forty-seven patients were enrolled. Mean preoperative prostate volume was 64.9 ± 28.5 g. When assessed at baseline, the mean total International Prostatic Symptoms Score was 15.2 ± 3.9, peak flow rate (Qmax) was 8.4 ± 2.9 mL/s and the post-voiding residual was 103.2 ± 90.6 mL. Four weeks after surgery, patients reported a mean International Prostatic Symptoms Score of 5.3 ± 3. This lower urinary tract symptoms relief was further maintained at 6 and 12 months after surgery. A significant postoperative improvement in uroflowmetry parameters was described, being the 6 and 12 months mean Qmax of 23.4 ± 10.6 mL/s and 18.8 ± 9.2 mL/s, respectively (P < .001). Overall, 14 postoperative complications were reported by 13 of 47 (27.6%) patients: most of them were minor complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade I-II), whereas 1 patient reported capsule perforation during surgery, requiring interruption of the procedure and its further completion (Clavien-Dindo IIIb). mTUEPA is a safe and effective technique, merging the principles of laser enucleation and the advantages of mechanical enucleation with standard monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate equipment.

Degarelix versus Goserelin plus Bicalutamide Therapy for Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Relief, Prostate Volume Reduction and Quality of Life Improvement in Men with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and tolerability of degarelix for lower urinary tract symptom relief, prostate volume reduction and quality of life improvement in men with prostate cancer (PCa). Materials and Methods: A literature review was performed to identify all of the published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that used degarelix versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists plus antiandrogens therapy for the treatment of PCa. The search included the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. Results: Three publications involving a total of 466 patients were used in the analysis, including three RCTs that compared degarelix with goserelin plus bicalutamide therapy for PCa over 12 weeks. For the comparison of degarelix with goserelin plus bicalutamide therapy, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) reduction (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -1.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -2.97 to -0.72, p = 0.001) and IPSS ≥13 (SMD = -2.68, 95% CI = -4.57 to -0.78, p = 0.006) indicated that decreases in IPSS were greater in degarelix-treated patients than in goserelin plus bicalutamide-treated patients. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis indicates that, compared with goserelin plus bicalutamide, degarelix has significantly more pronounced effects on lower urinary tract symptoms.

Neoadjuvant Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Volume Reduction, Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Relief and Quality of Life Improvement in Men with Intermediate- to High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Randomised Non-inferiority Trial of Degarelix versus Goserelin plus Bicalutamide

AimsThe treatment of intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer with radical radiotherapy is usually in combination with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy. The aim of the present trial was to investigate whether degarelix achieves comparable efficacy with that of goserelin plus bicalutamide as neoadjuvant therapy before radiotherapy. Materials and methodsThe study was a randomised, parallel-arm, active-controlled, open-label trial in 244 men with a UICC prostate cancer TNM category T2b–T4, N0, M0, Gleason score ≥7, or prostate-specific antigen ≥10 ng/ml and a total prostate volume >30 ml, who were scheduled to undergo radical radiotherapy and in whom neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy was indicated. Eligible patients received treatment with either monthly degarelix (240/80 mg) or goserelin (3.6 mg) for 12 weeks, the latter patients also receiving bicalutamide (50 mg) for 17 days initially. The primary efficacy measure was the mean percentage reduction in total prostate volume from baseline at week 12 measured by transrectal ultrasound. The severity and relief of lower urinary tract symptoms were assessed by the International Prostate Symptom Score questionnaire. Quality of life was assessed by the eighth question of the International Prostate Symptom Score. About 50% of the patients had moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms at baseline. ResultsThe total prostate volume decreased significantly from baseline to week 12 in both treatment groups, reaching −36.0 ± 14.5% in degarelix-treated patients and −35.3 ± 16.7% in goserelin-treated patients (adjusted difference: −0.3%; 95% confidence interval: −4.74; 4.14%). At the end of the therapy, more degarelix- than goserelin-treated patients reported International Prostate Symptom Score decreases of ≥3 points (37% versus 27%, P = 0.21). In addition, in patients with a baseline International Prostate Symptom Score of ≥13, the magnitude of the decrease was larger in degarelix- (n = 53) versus goserelin-treated patients (n = 17) (6.04 versus 3.41, P = 0.06). ConclusionsThe efficacy of degarelix in terms of prostate shrinkage is non-inferior to that of goserelin plus bicalutamide. The added benefits of degarelix in terms of more pronounced lower urinary tract symptom relief in symptomatic patients could be the reflection of differences in the direct effects on extra-pituitary receptors in the lower urinary tract [Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT00833248].

The Efficacy of Degarelix on LUTS (Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms) Relief in Patients with Prostate Cancer

Hormonal therapy is one of the treatment options for prostate cancer patients. There are many hormonal treatments modality to block the testosterone effect on prostate cancer cell proliferation. Degarelix is an innovative molecule able to antagonize the GnRH receptor with comparable oncological results to GnRH agonist, but with less side effects, avoiding the flare up phase, and better efficacy in LUTS relief. These characteristics of degarelix can impact on the clinical decision making to choose a therapy instead of another.

Androgen deprivation therapy for volume reduction, lower urinary tract symptom relief and quality of life improvement in patients with prostate cancer: degarelix vs goserelin plus bicalutamide

Study Type--Therapy (RCT) Level of Evidence 1b. What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is commonly used as a primary treatment for patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who are not eligible for radical treatment options. ADT is also used in patients with PCa as neo-adjuvant hormone therapy to reduce prostate volume and down-stage the disease before radiotherapy with curative intent. The present study showed that ADT with the gonadotropin hormone-releasing hormone (GhRH) antagonist degarelix is non-inferior to combined treatment with the LHRH agonist goserelin and bicalutamide in terms of reducing prostate volume during the treatment period of 3 months. Degarelix treatment evokes, however, significantly better relief of lower urinary tract symptoms in patients having moderate and severe voiding problems. • To assess the efficacy of monthly degarelix treatment for reduction of total prostate volume (TPV), relief of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and improvement of quality of life (QoL) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) using monthly goserelin as active control. • This was a randomized, parallel-arm, active-controlled, open-label, multicentre trial on 182 patients treated with either monthly degarelix (240/80 mg) or goserelin (3.6 mg) for 12 weeks. • For flare protection, goserelin-treated patients also received daily bicalutamide (50 mg) during the initial 28 days. • Key trial variables monitored monthly were TPV (primary endpoint), serum testosterone, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and the Benign Prostate Hyperplasia Impact Index. • In all, 175 patients completed the trial (96.1%). • At week 12, changes in TPV for degarelix and goserelin were similar (-37.2% vs -39.0%) and met the predefined non-inferiority criterion. • Decreases in IPSS were greater in degarelix than in goserelin-treated patients, differences being statistically significant in patients with baseline IPSS > 13 (-6.7 ± 1.8 vs -4.0 ± 1.0; P = 0.02). • The number of patients with an IPSS change of ≥ 3 over baseline was also significantly higher in patients treated with degarelix (61.0 vs 44.3%, P = 0.02). • Both treatments were safe and well tolerated. • Medical castration reduces TPV and could also improve LUTS in patients with PCa. • While the short-term efficacy of degarelix and goserelin + bicalutamide was the same in terms of TPV reduction, degarelix showed superiority in LUTS relief in symptomatic patients, which could highlight the different actions of these drugs on extrapituitary gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptors in the bladder and/or the prostate.

Combination Therapy for the Pharmacological Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

The management of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) continues to evolve, with new techniques and forms of medical management being introduced and traditional surgical techniques being used less frequently. Medical management of BPH has evolved from nonspecific alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists to uroselective alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists and 5-alpha reductase inhibitors. Traditionally, alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists have been used for relief of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) as a result of BPH and are known for their quick onset of action. 5-alpha Reductase inhibitors have proven useful for the prevention of BPH progression as measured by prostate volume, disease progression, incidence of acute urinary retention and the need for subsequent BPH-related surgery. Recent studies have shown that the combination of an alpha-adrenoceptor antagonist and a 5-alpha reductase inhibitor has significantly better efficacy than either drug alone or placebo. Currently, alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists are used in the acute setting or for short-term relief of LUTS. The combination of an alpha-adrenoceptor antagonist and a 5-alpha reductase inhibitor is used for the longer term management of BPH symptoms and to prevent progression of BPH and perhaps avoid surgical intervention.