Abstract Background Arsenic (As) exposure poses significant health risks to exposed populations, with exposure occurring predominantly via diet for the general population as recently referred by the European Food Safety Authority. This study assesses the environmental burden of disease (EBD) for three cancer types related to arsenic, across Europe. Methods A literature review was conducted to 1) identify the dose-response function (DRF) to assess the cancer risk in European populations, and 2) define EBD approaches applicable to the available data. Country-specific data (Belgium, Denmark, Portugal) for EBD calculation (exposure, socioeconomic status, health outcomes) were gathered. Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALY) estimations were performed by calculating attributable cases (AC). Results Two main references are used for DRF: the United States Food and Drug Administration DRF for assessing bladder and lung cancer risks, and the United States Environmental Protection Agency DRF for skin cancer. Preliminary results for Belgium indicate that inorganic arsenic dietary exposure ranges from 0.084 [0.080 - 0.088] to 0.102 [0.097 - 0.107] µg/kg body weight per day, varying with education level. Stratified estimates suggest that individuals with higher educational attainment (ISCED levels 5 & 6) have a marginally higher average daily intake of arsenic compared to those with lower educational attainment (ISCED levels 0, 1 & 2). DALY attributable to inorganic arsenic exposure follow the same trend as exposure levels, i.e. individuals with a higher education level bear a higher burden of disease than individuals of the low education stratum. This concerns the three studied cancers. Conclusions This study quantifies DALY related to inorganic arsenic from dietary exposure for different European countries. Our findings will contribute to better target public health policies and interventions for arsenic risk mitigation. Key messages • Exposure to inorganic arsenic is confirmed in European countries. • EBD studies guide action priorities to tackle chemical risk factors.
Read full abstract