Lower Risk Of Intracranial Hemorrhage Research Articles

Incidence of intracranial bleeding in mild traumatic brain injury patients taking oral anticoagulants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the leading causes of disability and death worldwide. Most TBI cases occur in older people, because they are at a higher risk of accidental falling. As the population ages, the use of anticoagulants is increasing. Some serious complications of TBI, such as intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), may occur even in mild cases. According to the current guidelines regarding managing mild TBI patients, a CT head scan is recommended for all patients receiving anticoagulation. We aim to assess the incidence of ICH in patients with mild TBI taking oral anticoagulants. Our systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) checklist. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024503086). Twenty-eight studies evaluating patients with a mild TBI from ten countries with a total sample size of 11,172, 5671 on DOACs, and 5501 on VKAs were included in our meta-analysis. The random-effects overall incidence of ICH among oral anticoagulated patients with mild TBI was calculated to be 9.4% [95% CI 7.2-12.1%, I2 = 89%]. The rates of immediate ICH for patients taking DOACs and VKAs were 6.4% and 10.5%, respectively. The overall rate of immediate ICH in anticoagulated mild TBI patients was 8.5% [95% CI 6.6-10.9%], with a high heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 88%). Furthermore, the rates of delayed ICH in patients with mild TBI taking DOACs and VKAs were 1.6% and 1.9%, respectively. The overall incidence of delayed ICH among oral anticoagulated mild TBI patients was 1.7% [95% CI 1-2.8%, I2 = 79%]. The overall rate of ICH among mild TBI patients taking DOAC was calculated to be 7.3% [95% CI 5.2-10.3%], with significant heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 79%). However, the overall ICH rate is higher in patients who take only VKAs 11.3% [95% CI 8.6-14.7%, I2 = 83%]. Patients on DOACs were at lower risk of ICH after mild TBI compared to patients on VKAs (OR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.48-0.86, p < 0.01, I2 = 28%). Our meta-analysis confirms the need for performing brain CT scan in patients with mild TBI patients who receive oral anticoagulants before injury. Due to limited data, further multi-center, prospective studies are warranted to confirm the true incidence of traumatic ICH in patients on anticoagulants.

Safety of DOACs in patients with Child-Pugh Class C cirrhosis and trial fibrillation.

Anticoagulation (AC) is used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) are safe in patients with AF without cirrhosis, they are hardly studied in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Our study evaluates the safety and outcomes of DOACs in patients with Child-Pugh class C cirrhosis (CPC). We queried TriNetX Database. Patients with CPC and AF were divided into three cohorts: patients on DOACs, no AC, and warfarin. Three study arms were created using a 1:1 propensity score matching system (PSM). Totally 16 029 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of those, 20.2% (n = 3235) were on DOACs, 47.1% (n = 7552) were not on AC, and 32.7% (n = 5242) were on warfarin. First arm comparing AC versus no AC, a statistically significant benefit was identified in 3-year mortality risk (47% vs 71%, P < 0.0001) and transplant status (17% vs 5%, p < 0.0001) with AC. However, no significant difference was identified regarding intracranial hemorrhage and GI bleeding risk. Second arm comparing patients on DOACs versus no AC, we identified mortality benefit (40% vs 72%, P < 0.0001) and a higher transplant rate (9% vs 3.2%, P < 0.0001) with DOACs. Intracranial hemorrhage rates (6% vs 4%, P = 0.03) were higher in patients on DOACs. Third arm comparing patients on DOACs versus Warfarin, a statistically significant lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage (6.6% vs 8.7%, P = 0.004) and GI bleed (2% vs 2.4%, P < 0.0001) were identified in patients on DOACs. Anticoagulation is safe in patients with CPC with AF and may provide a mortality benefit. DOACs are a safer alternative to warfarin.

Use of Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Significant Tricuspid Regurgitation.

There are limited data on the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation with significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR), which can lead to hepatic dysfunction and intestinal malabsorption. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of DOACs and warfarin for patients with atrial fibrillation with significant (moderate to severe) TR. A total of 1215 patients with significant TR and atrial fibrillation who were treated with warfarin (N=491) or DOACs (N=724) were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcomes were ischemic stroke, systemic embolic events, and hospitalization for major bleeding. The secondary outcomes were intracranial hemorrhage, hospitalization for gastrointestinal bleeding, all-cause mortality, and a composite outcome. The median follow-up duration was 2.4 years. In the inverse probability treatment weighting-adjusted cohort, DOACs and warfarin had a similar risk for ischemic stroke and systemic embolic events (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.67-1.36]; P=0.79) and major bleeding (aHR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.57-1.06]; P=0.11). For the secondary outcomes, relative to warfarin, DOACs had a lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage and the composite outcome, and a comparable risk for gastrointestinal bleeding and all-cause mortality. In the subgroup analysis, the effects of DOACs on ischemic stroke and systemic embolic events were comparable to the effects ofwarfarin, even in patients with inferior vena cava plethora (increased right atrial pressure) or severe TR. In this study, relative to warfarin, DOACs demonstrated comparable efficacy for ischemic stroke and systemic embolic events and major bleeding, with a lower intracranial hemorrhage risk in patients with significant TR and atrial fibrillation, indicating their effectiveness and safety.

Abstract 12514: Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Warfarin for Preventing Thromboembolic Events in Valvular Heart Diseases Associated Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and valvular heart disease (VHD) are common comorbidities, increasing the risk of thromboembolic events. While warfarin has been the standard for preventing stroke in AF patients, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as an effective substitute. However, their safety and efficacy in VHD patients have yet to be established. Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety of different DOAC agents versus warfarin in patients with AF and VHD in a network meta-analysis (NMA). Methods: We conducted an online search of databases for eligible studies from inception to April 2023. For dichotomous variables, we calculated the effect size using the risk ratio (RR) and its confidence interval (CI). We conducted frequentist and pairwise meta-analyses using the random-effects model in R-studio software. Results: Seven randomized controlled trials with 17533 patients were included in the review. Analysis of 6 studies showed that dabigatran 150 mg (RR 0.59, 95% CI [0.36, 0.98]) was associated with a lower risk of stroke compared to warfarin. Edoxaban 30 mg was associated with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding (RR 0.43, 95 CI [0.23, 0.81]). Compared to warfarin, dabigatran 110 mg (RR 0.29, 95% CI [0.13, 0.68]), edoxaban 30 mg (RR 0.30, 95% CI [0.11, 0.80]), dabigatran 150 mg (RR 0.36, 95% CI [0.17, 0.77]), edoxaban 60 mg (RR 0.37, 95% CI [0.15, 0.93]), and apixaban (RR 0.40, 95% CI [0.27, 0.61]), were associated with a significantly lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). All DOACs did not show any difference in terms of all-cause or cardiovascular mortality, except for rivaroxaban Conclusion: In patients with AF and VHD, Edoxaban 30 mg is the safest DOAC agent associated with a reduced risk of major bleeding, ICH, and GI trouble. Dabigatran 150 mg is associated with a reduced risk of stroke and ICH but with a higher risk of GI trouble. However, Rivaroxaban is associated with an increased risk of systemic embolism.

Management of Patients Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Clinical Practice and Challenging Scenarios.

It is well established that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are the cornerstone of anticoagulant strategy in atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) and should be preferred over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) since they are superior or non-inferior to VKAs in reducing thromboembolic risk and are associated with a lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage (IH). In addition, many factors, such as fewer pharmacokinetic interactions and less need for monitoring, contribute to the favor of this therapeutic strategy. Although DOACs represent a more suitable option, several issues should be considered in clinical practice, including drug-drug interactions (DDIs), switching to other antithrombotic therapies, preprocedural and postprocedural periods, and the use in patients with chronic renal and liver failure and in those with cancer. Furthermore, adherence to DOACs appears to remain suboptimal. This narrative review aims to provide a practical guide for DOAC prescription and address challenging scenarios.

Risk of intracranial hemorrhage with direct oral anticoagulation versus low molecular weight heparin in the treatment of brain tumor-associated venous thromboembolism: A meta-analysis

ObjectivesDirect oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are effective in treating cancer-related thrombosis and are superior to low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in terms of efficacy. The effects of DOACs or LMWH on intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) remain uncertain in individuals with brain tumors. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the frequency of ICH in individuals with brain tumors treated with DOACs or LMWH. MethodsTwo independent investigators reviewed all studies that compared the frequency of ICH in patients with brain tumors who received DOACs or LMWH. The primary outcome was the incidence of ICH. We used the Mantel-Haenszel method to estimate the combined effect and calculated 95% confidence intervals (CI). ResultsThis study encompassed six articles. The results indicated that cohorts treated with DOAC experienced much fewer instances of ICH compared to the LMWH cohorts (relative risk [RR] 0.39; 95% CI 0.23-0.65; P = 0.0003; I2 = 0%). The same effect was observed for the prevalence of major ICH (RR 0.34; 95% CI 0.12-0.97; P = 0.04; I2 = 0%), but there was no difference for fatal ICH. Subgroup analysis indicated that DOACs had a substantially reduced incidence of ICH in primary brain tumors (RR 0.18; 95% CI 0.06-0.50; P = 0.001; I2 = 0%), but had no impact on ICH with secondary brain tumors. ConclusionsThis meta-analysis showed that DOACs are associated with a lower risk of ICH than LMWH therapy in treating venous thromboembolism associated with brain tumors, especially in patients with primary brain tumors.

In Silico Study of Different Thrombolytic Agents for Fibrinolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Alteplase is the only FDA-approved drug for thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Meanwhile, several thrombolytic drugs are deemed to be promising candidates to substitute alteplase. This paper evaluates the efficacy and safety of urokinase, ateplase, tenecteplase, and reteplase for intravenous AIS therapy by computational simulations of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics combined with a local fibrinolysis model. The performances of the drugs are evaluated by comparing clot lysis time, plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI) inhibition resistance, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) risk, and activation time from drug administration to clot lysis. Our results reveal that urokinase has the quickest lysis completion but the highest ICH risk due to excess fibrinogen depletion in systemic plasma. While tenecteplase and alteplase have very similar thrombolysis efficacy, tenecteplase has a lower risk of ICH and better resistance to PAI-1. Among the four simulated drugs, reteplase has the slowest fibrinolysis rate, but fibrinogen concentration in systemic plasma is unaffected during thrombolysis.

Abstract 53: Long-term Treatment Risk Of Hemorrhage In Unruptured Brain Arteriovenous Malformation Patients

Introduction: The long-term effects of interventional treatment (with surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, or endovascular embolization) for unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (uBAVM) are uncertain. We address this in a large multi-center international cohort study comparing risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in the treated and untreated course of uBAVM patients. Methods: We pooled individual patient data (n=3,291) from 10 cohorts and imputed missing data. Survival analysis was performed from time of uBAVM diagnosis to intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) using Cox models, stratified by cohort, censoring at death or last follow-up, and including BAVM interventional treatment as a time-varying covariate. We tested for an interaction of treatment with follow-up time, then estimated the association of interventional treatment with ICH, adjusting for propensity quintile. Individual treatment propensity scores were calculated using logistic regression with Spetzler-Martin grade, sex, diagnosis age and year, cohort, and presence of presenting symptoms (seizures, headaches, and/or deficits). Results: Median cohort age was 36 years, 48% were female, and 77% received ≥1 treatment modality for uBAVM during follow-up. 373 ICH occurred during 32,054 person-years of follow-up (median=6.6y), for an ICH rate of 1.16 per 100 P-Y. Overall, treatment was not associated with risk of ICH (HR=1.12, 95% CI=0.89-1.51, p=0.33). However, we observed a strong interaction between treatment and follow-up time (p&lt;0.001): between 0-1 year, treatment was associated with higher risk of ICH (HR=3.48, 95% CI: 2.26-5.37, p&lt;0.001); between 1-10 years, we found no association between treatment and risk of ICH (HR=1.02, 95% CI: 0.73-1.45, p=0.87); after 10 years, treatment was associated with a lower risk of ICH (HR=0.46, 95% CI: 0.30-0.70, p&lt;0.001). Survival curves for untreated and treated courses crossed around 17 years. Conclusion: After accounting for treatment propensity for uBAVM, we found an initial increased risk of ICH in the treated relative to untreated course, which continually declined over time with survival curves crossing around 17 years. These results require confirmation in a randomized controlled trial of uBAVM with long-term follow-up.

Gender Differences in Atrial Fibrillation: From the Thromboembolic Risk to the Anticoagulant Treatment Response

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia associated with an increased thromboembolic risk. The impact of the female sex as an independent risk factor for thromboembolic events in AF is still debated. Background and Objectives: The aim of this review is to evaluate the gender-related differences in cardioembolic risk and response to anticoagulants among AF patients. Materials and Methods: The PubMed database is used to review the reports about gender differences and thromboembolic risk in atrial fibrillation. Results: Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) represent the gold standard for thromboembolic risk prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Despite a similar rate of stroke and systemic embolism (SE) among men and women in NOACs or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) treatment, the use of NOACs in AF women is associated with a lower risk of intracranial bleeding, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality than in men. Conclusions: The female sex can be defined as a stroke risk modifier rather than a stroke risk factor since it mainly increases the thromboembolic risk in the presence of other risk factors. Further studies about the efficacy and safety profile of NOACs according to sex are needed to support clinicians in performing the most appropriate and tailored anticoagulant therapy, either in male or female AF patients.

Evaluation of Patient Characteristics Linked to Major Bleeding Events in Patients Prescribed Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) demonstrated similar efficacy and lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage than warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. Given the lack of data identifying risk factors in patients who bled while on a DOAC, we sought to investigate these characteristics. This retrospective chart review was approved by the Mass General Brigham Institutional Review Board and assessed patients who experienced bleeding events while on DOAC therapy from 6/1/2015 to 7/1/2020. Patient characteristics were evaluated, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), renal function, concomitant therapies, and baseline comorbidities. Eighty-seven patients were included for analysis, with a median age of 75.8 years. Most patients were female (51.7%) and 24 (27.6%) had a BMI >30. At time-of-event, 21 patients (24.1%) had acute kidney injury. Thirty-three patients (37.9%) were on concomitant antiplatelet therapy (APT), with 31 (35.6%) on single APT and 2 on dual APT. Pertinent comorbidities included hypertension (74.7%), ischemic cerebrovascular accident (28.7%), thyroid abnormality (23.0%), active cancer (14.9%), and anemia (13.8%). Eleven patients (12.6%) had a prior bleeding event. Most patients were on apixaban (69.0%) for the indication of stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation/flutter (72.4%). FDA-approved dosing was used in most patients (92.0%), and all deviations reflected underdosing. Most bleeding events were defined as major (95.4%), occurred at a critical organ site (72.4%), and developed spontaneously (58.6%). These data provide insight into characteristics of patients who experience bleeding events while on DOAC therapy. Understanding these potential risk factors may optimize the safe use of these agents.

Cardiovascular and renal protective effects of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation.

AimData on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in relation to the risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease and renal protection among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), are relatively sparse. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of NOACs with those of warfarin for vascular protection in a large-scale, nationwide Asian population with AF.Methods and resultsPatients with AF who were prescribed oral anticoagulants according to the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment database between 2014 and 2017 were analyzed. The warfarin and NOAC groups were balanced using propensity score weighting. Clinical outcomes included ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, peripheral artery disease, chronic kidney disease (CKD), end-stage renal disease (ESRD), CV death, and all-cause death. NOAC use was associated with a lower risk of angina pectoris (HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.69–0.89] p<0.001), CKD stage 4 (HR, 0.5 [95% CI, 0.28–0.89], p = 0.02), and ESRD (HR, 0.15[95% CI, 0.08–0.32], p<0.001) than warfarin use. NOACs and warfarin did not significantly differ with respect to stroke reduction (HR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.88–1.25], p = 0.19). NOAC use was associated with a lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage (HR, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.44–0.83], p = 0.0019), CV death (HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.43–0.70], p<0.001), and all-cause death (HR, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.52–0.69], p<0.001) than warfarin use.ConclusionNOACs were associated with a significantly lower risk of adverse CV and renovascular outcomes than warfarin in patients with AF.

ICH in primary or metastatic brain cancer patients with or without anticoagulant treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AbstractAnticoagulant treatment in patients with primary and metastatic brain cancer is a concern due to risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the risk of ICH in patients with primary or metastatic brain cancer treated with or without anticoagulants. Articles on ICH in patients with primary or metastatic brain cancer treated with or without anticoagulants published up to September 2021 were identified by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. The primary outcome of this analysis was ICH. Thirty studies were included. Rate of ICH was 13.0% in 1009 patients with metastatic brain cancer and 6.4% in 2353 patients with primary brain cancer (relative risk [RR], 3.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.69-3.94; I2 = 92.8%). In patients with primary brain cancer, ICH occurred in 12.5% and 4.4% of patients treated with or without anticoagulants, respectively (11 studies, 659 treated and 1346 not treated patients; RR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.48-4.67; I2 = 49.6%). In patients with metastatic brain cancer, ICH occurred in 14.7% and 15.4% (5 studies, 265 treated and 301 not treated patients; RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.43-1.93; I2 = 0%). ICH occurred in 8.3% of 172 treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and in 11.7% of 278 treated with low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (5 studies; RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.25-0.79; I2 = 0%). Patients with metastatic brain cancer have a particularly high risk of ICH. Patients with primary brain cancer have an increased risk of ICH during anticoagulation. DOACs are associated with a lower risk of ICH than LMWH.

Timing of Anticoagulation after Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and ischemic stroke are at high risk for stroke recurrence. Early anticoagulation may reduce the risk of recurrent events but is usually avoided due to the risk of hemorrhagic transformation (HT). Current guidelines are based on empiric expert opinion. The assumed risk of HT is based on historical data from an older generation of anticoagulants. The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have demonstrated lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage compared to older anticoagulants. However, the optimal timing of DOAC initiation after AF-related ischemic stroke has remained an area of clinical equipoise, as the pivotal phase III trials did not include patients in the early period after ischemic stroke. Multiple prospective studies and a few smaller randomized controlled trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of early versus delayed DOAC initiation have been completed. These studies have reported promising results of early DOAC initiation after acute ischemic stroke. However, a standardized documentation of HT rates on follow-up imaging with objective assessment criteria is missing from most of these studies. Larger randomized trials of early versus delayed DOAC are ongoing. A literature review was performed using keywords and Medical Subject Headings in MEDLINE/PubMed and Google Scholar databases. For each relevant paper, the bibliography was scrutinized for other relevant articles and journals. In this article, we review the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke and HT in patients with AF, pathophysiology, classification, predictors, natural history, and outcomes of HT and discuss the studies of early anticoagulation after AF-related ischemic stroke.

Association Between Beta-Blocker or Statin Drug Use and the Risk of Hemorrhage From Cerebral Cavernous Malformations.

Background:We aimed to determine the association between beta-blocker or statin drug use and the future risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage or persistent/progressive focal neurological deficit from cerebral cavernous malformations (CCM).Methods:The population-based Scottish Audit of Intracranial Vascular Malformations prospectively identified adults resident in Scotland first diagnosed with CCM during 1999 to 2003 or 2006 to 2010. We compared the association between beta-blocker or statin drug use after first presentation and the occurrence of new intracranial hemorrhage or persistent/progressive focal neurological deficit due to CCM for up to 15 years of prospective follow-up. We confirmed proportional hazards and used survival analysis with multivariable adjustment for age, intracranial hemorrhage at CCM presentation, and brain stem CCM location.Results:Sixty-three (21%) of 300 adults used beta-blockers (27/63 [43%] used propranolol), and 73 (24%) used statin drugs over 3634 person-years of follow-up. At baseline, the only statistically significant imbalances in prespecified potential confounders were age by statin use and intracranial hemorrhage at presentation by beta-blocker use. Beta-blocker use was associated with a lower risk of new intracranial hemorrhage or persistent/progressive focal neurological deficit (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.09 [95% CI, 0.01–0.66]; P=0.018). Statin use was associated with a nonsignificant lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage or persistent/progressive focal neurological deficit (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.01–1.07]; P=0.067).Conclusions:Beta-blocker, but not statin, use was associated with a lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage or persistent/progressive focal neurological deficit in patients with CCM.

Termination Based on Event Accrual in Per Protocol Versus Intention to Treat in the ROCKET AF Trial

BackgroundIn event‐driven clinical trials, study termination is based on accrual of a target number of primary efficacy events. For noninferiority trials in which superiority is conditionally examined, the ideal cohort in which to track event accrual is unclear. We used data from the ROCKET AF (Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation) trial to determine the effect of primary efficacy‐event tracking in the per‐protocol cohort during the on‐treatment period versus the intention‐to‐treat (ITT) cohort during the ITT period.Methods and ResultsROCKET AF was terminated after accruing 429 primary efficacy events (stroke or systemic embolism) in the per‐protocol cohort during the on‐treatment period for noninferiority. We identified the date on which 429 events occurred in the ITT cohort during the ITT period. We performed noninferiority and superiority analyses based on hypothetical study termination on this date. ROCKET AF would have terminated 226 days earlier if events were tracked during the ITT period. Similar to the main trial findings, rivaroxaban would have met noninferiority versus warfarin for the primary efficacy end point (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62–0.96; P<0.001). In contrast to the main trial findings, rivaroxaban would have met superiority for the primary efficacy end point (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68–0.99; P=0.038). In both termination scenarios, rivaroxaban was associated with a lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage and similar risk of other safety end points.ConclusionsClinical trial termination based on event accrual in the ITT cohort versus the per‐protocol cohort may have important implications on trial results depending on rates of study drug discontinuation and event rates off treatment.

Many Good Reasons to Switch from Vitamin K Antagonists to Non-Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation.

Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are the first choice for prophylaxis of cardioembolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) who are anticoagulant-naïve, as well as the preferable anticoagulation strategy in those who are on vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), but with a low time in therapeutic range (TTR). Nonetheless, there are many good reasons to consider switching from VKAs to NOACs also when TTR is >70%. From the pharmacological standpoint, anticoagulation with VKAs may remain erratic even in those patients who have high TTR values, owing to the mode of action of this drug class. Furthermore, experimental data suggest that, unlike VKAs, NOACs favorably modulate the effects of factor Xa and thrombin in the cardiovascular system through the protease-activated receptor family. Clinically, the most striking advantage provided by NOACs over VKAs, irrespective of the TTR, is the substantially lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage. NOACs have also been associated with less deterioration of renal function as compared with VKAs and may confer protection against cardiovascular events not strictly related to AF, especially the acute complications of peripheral artery disease. In this narrative review, we discuss the evidence according to which it is warranted to systematically substitute NOACs for VKAs for the prevention of AF-related stroke and systemic embolism.

Act quickly to manage bleeding in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly preferred anticoagulation options, with a lower risk of intracranial haemorrhage versus warfarin. Bleeding is, however, a predictable adverse event requiring urgent management. Specific DOAC reversal agents may be available, such as idarucizumab for the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, and andexanet alfa for the factor Xa inhibitors apixaban, edoxaban (off-label) and rivaroxaban; but prothrombin complex concentrates are still often used in addition to supportive measures and haemostatic support.

Risk of intracranial hemorrhage with direct oral anticoagulants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlledtrials.

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) between direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and other antithrombotic drugs in detail across all diseases. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Heterogeneity was examined using the I2 statistic. Risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. Fifty-five RCTs were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), dabigatran reduced the risk of ICH by 60% (RR 0.40; 95% CI 0.28-0.57), apixaban by 57% (RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.31-0.58), edoxaban by 56% (RR 0.44; 95% CI 0.29-0.67) and rivaroxaban by 41% (RR 0.59; 95%CI 0.44-0.80). Compared with low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs), apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban had a similar risk of ICH. Compared with aspirin, dabigatran and apixaban had a similar risk of ICH, while rivaroxaban posed an increased risk of ICH (RR 2.12; 95% CI 1.31-3.44). For secondary prevention stroke, DOACs reduced the risk of ICH by 46% compared with warfarin (RR 0.54;95% CI [0.42-0.70]) and had a similar risk of ICH compared with aspirin. All DOACs had a lower risk of ICH than VKAs. In terms of the risk of ICH, DOACs were overall as safe as LMWHs, and apixaban and dabigatran were as safe as aspirin, but rivaroxaban was not. For secondary prevention stroke, the risk of ICH with DOACs was overall lower than warfarin and similar to aspirin, but it should be noted that compared with aspirin, rivaroxaban may increase the risk of ICH. This is the first pair-wise meta-analysis that compares the risk of ICH between DOACs and other antithrombotic drugs in detail across all diseases, which may have certain significance for patients with high risk of ICH to choose antithrombotic drugs in clinical practice.

Cilostazol Versus Aspirin for Secondary Stroke Prevention: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

ObjectivesCilostazol has promise as an alternative to aspirin for secondary stroke prevention given its vasodilatory and anti-inflammatory properties in addition to platelet aggregation inhibition. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the efficacy and safety of cilostazol compared to aspirin for stroke prevention in patients with previous stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Materials and methodsWe searched PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1996 to 2019. Randomized clinical trials that compared cilostazol to aspirin and reported the endpoints of ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage and any bleeding were included. A random-effects estimate was computed based on the Mantel-Haenszel method. The pooled risk estimates with 95% confidence intervals were compared between cilostazol and aspirin. ResultsThe search identified 5 randomized clinical trials comparing cilostazol vs. aspirin for secondary stroke prevention that collectively enrolled 7240 patients, all from Asian countries (3615 received cilostazol and 3625 received aspirin). Pooled results from the random-effects model showed that cilostazol was associated with significantly lower risk of recurrent ischemic stroke (RR 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.87), intracranial hemorrhage (RR 0.42; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.65) and any bleeding (RR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.91). ConclusionsThis meta-analysis suggests that cilostazol is more effective than aspirin in preventing recurrent ischemic stroke with lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage and other bleeding. Since all trials to date are from Asian countries, confirmatory trials of cilostazol for secondary stroke prevention in other populations are needed.

Utility of Inferior Vena Cava Filter in the Management of Venous Thromboembolism Among Patients with Brain Metastases: A Population-Based Study

Background: Brain metastases are a frequently occurring and devastating complication of solid organ malignancies. Individuals with brain metastases are noted to be high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) due to hypercoagulability from their malignancy, immobility, and need for cancer directed therapies. The management of VTE in patients with brain metastases is challenging due to the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) with therapeutic anticoagulation. Inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) are often used to mitigate the risk of ICH, however the utility of this practice and the impact on survival is not clear. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the linked California Cancer Registry (CCR) and California Patient Discharge Database (PDD) between 2005-2017 with follow up available to 2018. We identified individuals with breast and lung cancer (because they are common), and renal cell carcinoma and melanoma (because of bleeding tendency of brain metastases) who had an incident hospitalization with VTE (either pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis or both). Brain metastasis were identified using the presence of International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code 198.3 or ICD-10-CM code C79.31 present anytime in PDD and cases were classified as having brain metastases if the code was present prior to or at the time of the index VTE. Cases with multiple malignancies were excluded. ICD-9-CM code 38.7 and ICD-10-CM code 02HV was used to identify patients who received an IVCF. Univariate analysis was used to determine differences in baseline characteristics between those that did and did not receive an IVCF. A logistic regression model that included patient and index VTE hospital characteristics was used to develop a propensity score for IVCF placement. The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and 180-day intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) determined by ICD codes. A Cox proportional hazards model, inverse propensity weighted for IVCF placement, was used to assess the effect of IVCF placement (as a time-dependent variable) on 30-day mortality. The effect of IVCF on ICH was assessed with a 1:3 propensity matched Fine-Gray model, accounting for the competing risk of death. Results: There were 17,182 patients with a diagnosis of VTE present on admission and an active first primary cancer diagnosis of interest, of these 3,309 (19.3%) had a diagnosis of brain metastasis with median follow-up of 96.8 months. The baseline characteristics of patients are summarized in Table 1. Among patients with brain metastases, 757 of 3309 (22.9%) had an IVCF inserted versus 1801 of 13873 (13.0%) in those without brain metastases (p&amp;lt;0.001). In a multivariable logistic regression model the presence of brain metastasis was an independent predictor for the placement of IVCF (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.84 (95% CI 1.64-2.05). Using balanced (standardized mean difference less than 0.1 for all covariates included in the model) IPW-adjusted Cox regression model, the use of IVCF did not reduce the 30-day risk of death in those with acute VTE (Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.08 (95% CI 0.95-1.23). The presence of brain metastases was associated with a higher 30-day risk of death (HR 1.23 (95% CI 1.13- 1.35). Using IPW-adjusted Cox model restricted to those with brain metastasis, IVCF use was associated with a trend towards reduced 30-day risk of death (HR 0.86 (95% CI 0.73-1.01). In a propensity matched Cox regression competing risk model, the presence of brain metastases was significantly associated with an increased 180-day risk of ICH (HR 6.91 (95% CI 3.54-13.48), with no difference for those that received an IVCF (HR 1.31 (95% CI 0.85-2.01). When compared to breast cancer patients, those with lung cancer had lower risk of ICH (HR 0.28, CI 0.13-0.64), but melanoma and renal cell cancer did not have higher risk. Conclusions: This real-world retrospective population-based study demonstrated the use of IVCF was higher for patients with brain metastases among these four tumor types. There was a suggestion of reduced short-term mortality associated with IVCF placement in VTE patients and brain metastases, but this was not statistically significant. Although limited by the lack of data on anticoagulation use, there was no effect of IVCF placement on the risk of ICH. Randomized clinical trials are needed to determine the effect of IVCF on clinically relevant outcomes for VTE in patients with brain metastasis. Disclosures Key: Takeda: Research Funding; Grifols: Research Funding; Uniqure: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Other: Chair of Grants Committee. Wun:Glycomimetics, Inc.: Consultancy.