Low First-phase Insulin Response Research Articles

Heterogeneity of beta-cell function in subjects with multiple islet autoantibodies in the TEDDY family prevention study - TEFA

BackgroundIndividuals with multiple islet autoantibodies are at increased risk for clinical type 1 diabetes and may proceed gradually from stage to stage complicating the recruitment to secondary prevention studies. We evaluated multiple islet autoantibody positive subjects before randomisation for a clinical trial 1 month apart for beta-cell function, glucose metabolism and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). We hypothesized that the number and type of islet autoantibodies in combination with different measures of glucose metabolism including fasting glucose, HbA1c, oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), intra venous glucose tolerance test (IvGTT) and CGM allows for more precise staging of autoimmune type 1 diabetes than the number of islet autoantibodies alone.MethodsSubjects (n = 57) at 2–50 years of age, positive for two or more islet autoantibodies were assessed by fasting plasma insulin, glucose, HbA1c as well as First Phase Insulin Response (FPIR) in IvGTT, followed 1 month later by OGTT, and 1 week of CGM (n = 24).ResultsAutoantibodies against GAD65 (GADA; n = 52), ZnT8 (ZnT8A; n = 40), IA-2 (IA-2A; n = 38) and insulin (IAA; n = 28) were present in 9 different combinations of 2–4 autoantibodies. Fasting glucose and HbA1c did not differ between the two visits. The estimate of the linear relationship between log2-transformed FPIR as the outcome and log2-transformed area under the OGTT glucose curve (AUC) as the predictor, adjusting for age and sex was − 1.88 (− 2.71, − 1.05) p = 3.49 × 10–5. The direction of the estimates for all glucose metabolism measures was positive except for FPIR, which was negative. FPIR was associated with higher blood glucose. Both the median and the spread of the CGM glucose data were significantly associated with higher glucose values based on OGTT, higher HbA1c, and lower FPIR. There was no association between glucose metabolism, autoantibody number and type except that there was an indication that the presence of at least one of ZnT8(Q/R/W) A was associated with a lower log2-transformed FPIR (− 0.80 (− 1.58, − 0.02), p = 0.046).ConclusionsThe sole use of two or more islet autoantibodies as inclusion criterion for Stage 1 diabetes in prevention trials is unsatisfactory. Staging type 1 diabetes needs to take the heterogeneity in beta-cell function and glucose metabolism into account.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02605148, November 16, 2015

Beta cell function in participants with single or multiple islet autoantibodies at baseline in the TEDDY Family Prevention Study: TEFA.

AimThe aim of the present study was to assess beta cell function based on an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in participants with single islet autoantibody or an intravenous glucose tolerance test (IvGTT) in participants with multiple islet autoantibodies.Materials and methodsHealthy participants in Sweden and Finland, between 2 and 49.99 years of age previously identified as positive for a single (n = 30) autoantibody to either insulin, glutamic acid decarboxylase, islet antigen‐2, zinc transporter 8 or islet cell antibodies or multiple autoantibodies (n = 46), were included. Participants positive for a single autoantibody underwent a 6‐point OGTT while participants positive for multiple autoantibodies underwent an IvGTT. Glucose, insulin and C‐peptide were measured from OGTT and IvGTT samples.ResultsAll participants positive for a single autoantibody had a normal glucose tolerance test with 120 minutes glucose below 7.70 mmol/L and HbA1c values within the normal range (<42 mmol/mol). Insulin responses to the glucose challenge on OGTT ranged between 13.0 and 143 mIU/L after 120 minutes with C‐peptide values between 0.74 and 4.60 nmol/L. In Swedish participants, the first‐phase insulin response (FPIR) on IvGTT was lower in those positive for three or more autoantibodies (n = 13; median 83.0 mIU/L; range 20.0‐343) compared to those with two autoantibodies (n = 15; median 146 mIU/L; range 19.0‐545; P = .0330).ConclusionParticipants positive for a single autoantibody appeared to have a normal beta cell function. Participants positive for three or more autoantibodies had a lower FPIR as compared to participants with two autoantibodies, supporting the view that their beta cell function had deteriorated.

344-OR: Slowed Metabolic Decline after Oral Insulin (OI) in Relatives at High Risk for Type 1 Diabetes (T1D)

We assessed whether OI slowed metabolic decline after 1 yr of treatment among highest risk relatives who participated in the Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1 (DPT1) and TrialNet (TN) T1D prevention trials for OI. As published, with a diagnosis of T1D as the endpoint, both OI trials (7.5 mg/day) were negative overall. However, subgroup analyses suggested efficacy for those at high risk in each trial (DPT1: higher titer of insulin autoantibodies; TN: lower first-phase insulin response). Thus, we assessed whether OI slowed metabolic decline among the OI trial participants at highest risk, defined by DPT1 Risk Scores over a 6.75 threshold (DPTRS; OGTT C-peptide and glucose, age, and BMI), above which T1D risk increases sharply as DPTRS increases. Of 73% in DPT1 and 89% in TN with 1 yr OGTTs, 32% in DPT1 (90/282; age: 8.7±4.8 yrs) and 35% in TN (118/340; age: 6.9±3.3 yrs) were in the highest risk groups (3 yr risks: 56% in DPT-1; 55% in TN). In the analysis, area under curve (AUC) C-peptide increased from baseline to 1 yr in both OI groups (DPT1: p&amp;lt;0.01; TN: p&amp;lt;0.05) but not in the placebo groups, while AUC glucose increased more in the placebo groups (DPT1: p&amp;lt;0.01; TN: p&amp;lt;0.01) than in the OI groups (DPT1: p&amp;lt;0.05; TN: n.s.). Consistent with those changes, in both trials the 1 yr AUC C-peptide/AUC glucose ratio (x100; AUC ratio) was greater in the OI group than in the placebo group [DPT1: 2.86±1.06 vs. 2.42±1.03 (ng/ml)/(mg/dl); TN: 3.06±1.13 vs. 2.57±0.96 (ng/ml)/(mg/dl); p-value&amp;lt;0.05 for each (baseline adjusted)]. For DPT1 and TN combined (no interaction for treatment between trials), the p-value for the AUC ratio difference was &amp;lt;0.001. Of those with DPTRS &amp;lt;6.75 (3 yr risk: 24% for both DPT1 and TN), the AUC ratio did not differ between OI and placebo. In conclusion, when DPTRS was &amp;gt;6.75 metabolic outcomes at 1 yr appeared similarly favorable for OI in the DPT1 and TN trials, suggesting OI slows insulin decline in those at high risk for T1D. Moreover, metabolic measures could be useful endpoints for T1D prevention trials. Disclosure J. Sosenko: None. J.P. Palmer: None. M.J. Haller: Advisory Panel; Self; SAB Biotherapeutics, Inc. J.S. Skyler: Advisory Panel; Self; Abvance Therapeutics, ADOCIA, Avotres, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Dance Biopharm Holdings, Inc., Immunomolecular Therapeutics, Intrexon, Oramed Pharmaceuticals, Orgenesis Inc., Sanofi, Tolerion, Inc., Viacyte, Inc. Board Member; Self; Applied Therapeutics, Dexcom, Inc., Intarcia Therapeutics. Consultant; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. Research Support; Self; Tolerion, Inc. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Applied Therapeutics, Dexcom, Inc., Intarcia Therapeutics. A. Pugliese: None. D. Schatz: None.

Abnormalities in autonomic function in obese boys at-risk for insulin resistance and obstructive sleep apnea.

Study Objectives:Current evidence in adults suggests that, independent of obesity, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) can lead to autonomic dysfunction and impaired glucose metabolism, but these relationships are less clear in children. The purpose of this study was to investigate the associations among OSA, glucose metabolism and daytime autonomic function in obese pediatric subjects.Methods:Twenty-three obese boys participated in: overnight polysomnography; a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test; and recordings of spontaneous cardiorespiratory data in both the supine (baseline) and standing (sympathetic stimulus) postures.Results:Baseline systolic blood pressure and reactivity of low-frequency heart rate variability to postural stress correlated with insulin resistance, increased fasting glucose, and reduced beta cell function, but not OSA severity. Baroreflex sensitivity reactivity was reduced with sleep fragmentation, but only for subjects with low insulin sensitivity and/or low first-phase insulin response to glucose.Conclusions:These findings suggest that vascular sympathetic activity impairment is more strongly affected by metabolic dysfunction than by OSA severity, while blunted vagal autonomic function associated with sleep fragmentation in OSA is enhanced when metabolic dysfunction is also present.

Assessment of β Cell Mass and Function by AIRmax and Intravenous Glucose in High-Risk Subjects for Type 1 Diabetes.

There is little information regarding β cell mass in individuals at early stages of type 1 diabetes (T1D). To investigate both acute insulin response to arginine at hyperglycemia (AIRmax), as a correlate of β cell mass, and β cell function by the intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) in subjects at early stages of T1D. Forty subjects were enrolled: (1) low-risk group: relatives of patients with T1D with 0 to 1 antibody (n = 21) and (2) high-risk group: relatives with ≥2 antibodies (n = 19). Acute insulin and C-peptide responses to IVGTT and to AIRmax. Participants underwent two IVGTT and AIRmax procedures on different days. AIRmax was reproducible, well tolerated, and correlated to first-phase insulin response (FPIR) from IVGTT (r = 0.779). The high-risk group had greater impaired β cell function compared with the low-risk group, determined both by lower mean FPIR and a greater number of subjects below an established threshold for abnormal function [10 of 19 (52.6%) versus 4 of 21 (19%)]. There was a heterogeneous AIRmax response in these subjects with low FPIR, ranging from 38 to 250 μU/mL. There is significant variation in insulin secretory reserve as assessed by AIRmax in family members with low β cell function assessed by FPIR. As AIRmax is a functional measure of β cell mass, these data suggest heterogeneity in disease pathogenesis in which mass is preserved in relation to function in some individuals. The tolerability and reproducibility of AIRmax suggest it could be a useful stratification measure in clinical trials of disease-modifying therapy.

Prevalence of pancreatic autoantibodies in non-diabetic patients with autoimmune thyroid disease and its relation to insulin secretion and glucose tolerance.

We evaluated the prevalence of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GADA) and tyrosine phosphatase-protein antibodies (IA2A), their titers and their relation to first phase insulin response (FPIR) and glucose tolerance in autoimmune thyroid diseases (ATDs) patients. Graves' disease (GD; n = 181) and Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT; n = 143) patients in addition to healthy controls (n = 93) were studied. Secondly, FPIR and oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) were performed in 11 anti-pancreatic islet-cell (+) and in 20 anti-pancreatic-cell (-) patients. There was a non significant trend for higher prevalence of GADA positivity in GD vs HT (7.2% vs 2% p = 0.06), but the GADA titers were higher in HT. We also did not find a significant difference in IA2 prevalence (0.7% vs 0.0%) between these two groups or compared to the control group. In the subsequent analysis, low FPIR was found in 10% of these patients but without statistical difference for OGTT between pancreatic antibody-positive and -negative patients. A trend for greater prevalence of GADA was observed for GD patients than for HT or control. However, the titers of these autoantibodies were higher in HT patients, but there was no significant relation to insulin secretion and glucose tolerance at that moment and stage of autoimmune diseases.

Insulin secretion and sensitivity in the prediction of type 1 diabetes in children with advanced β-cell autoimmunity

Reduced early insulin response has been shown to predict type 1 diabetes (T1D) in first-degree relatives of diabetic patients, while its role, as well as that of insulin resistance, has remained poorly defined in young children representing the general population. The predictive values of these markers and their relation to other risk factors of T1D were assessed in children with advanced β-cell autoimmunity, i.e. persistent positivity for two or more autoantibodies. Intravenous glucose tolerance tests (IVGTTs) were carried out in 218 children with HLA-DQB1-conferred disease susceptibility and advanced β-cell autoimmunity. Baseline, metabolic and growth data were compared between children progressing to diabetes and those remaining unaffected. Hazard ratios for the disease predictors and the progression rate of T1D were assessed. Children developing T1D were younger at seroconversion, progressed more rapidly to advanced β-cell autoimmunity and had lower first-phase insulin response (FPIR) and homeostasis model assessment index for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) than those remaining non-diabetic. The levels of HOMA-IR/FPIR, islet cell antibodies, insulin autoantibodies (IAA) and islet antigen 2 antibodies (IA-2A) were higher in progressors. BMI SDS, FPIR, age at IVGTT and levels of IAA and IA-2A were predictive markers for T1D. Young age, higher BMI SDS, reduced FPIR and higher levels of IAA and IA-2A predicted T1D in young children with HLA-DQB1-conferred disease susceptibility and advanced β-cell autoimmunity. Disease risk estimates were successfully stratified by the assessment of metabolic status and BMI. The role of insulin resistance as an accelerator of the disease process was minor.

Prognostic accuracy of immunologic and metabolic markers for type 1 diabetes in a high-risk population: receiver operating characteristic analysis.

OBJECTIVETo establish and compare the prognostic accuracy of immunologic and metabolic markers in predicting onset of type 1 diabetes in those with high risk in a prospective study.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSA total of 339 subjects from the Diabetes Prevention Trial–Type 1 (DPT-1) parenteral study, who were islet cell antibody (ICA)-positive, with low first-phase insulin response (FPIR) and/or abnormal glucose tolerance at baseline, were followed until clinical diabetes onset or study end (5-year follow-up). The prognostic performance of biomarkers was estimated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and compared with nonparametric testing of ROC curve areas. Pearson correlation was used to assess the relationship between the markers.RESULTSIndividually, insulin autoantibody titer, ICA512A titer, peak C-peptide, 2-h glucose, FPIR, and FPIR/homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance provided modest but significant prognostic values for 5-year risk with a similar level of area under ROC curve ranging between 0.61 and 0.67. The combination of 2-h glucose, peak C-peptide, and area under the curve C-peptide significantly improved the prognostic accuracy compared with any solitary index (P < 0.05) with an area under ROC curve of 0.76 (95% CI 0.70–0.81). The addition of antibody titers and/or intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) markers did not increase the prognostic accuracy further (P = 0.46 and P = 0.66, respectively).CONCLUSIONSThe combination of metabolic markers derived from the oral glucose tolerance test improved accuracy in predicting progression to type 1 diabetes in a population with ICA positivity and abnormal metabolism. The results indicate that the autoimmune activity may not alter the risk of type 1 diabetes after metabolic function has deteriorated. Future intervention trials may consider eliminating IVGTT measurements as an effective cost-reduction strategy for prognostic purposes.

Replication of genome‐wide association signals of type 2 diabetes in Han Chinese in a prospective cohort

A recent genome-wide association study for type 2 diabetes in Han Chinese identified several novel genetic variants. We investigated their associations with quantitative measures to explore the mechanism by which these variants influence glucose homoeostasis. We also examined whether these variants predict progression to diabetes in a large prospective family based Chinese cohort. Five single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) near the protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type, D (PTPRD), SRR, MAF/WWOX, and KCNQ1 genes were genotyped in 1138 subjects of Chinese origin from the Stanford Asia-Pacific Program for Hypertension and Insulin Resistance study. At baseline, the risk-conferring rs7192960 C allele near the MAF/WWOX genes was associated with lower homoeostasis model assessment of β-cell (HOMA-β) (P = 0·01) and second-phase insulin response in oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (P = 0·04). The risk-conferring rs2237897 C alleles in the KCNQ1 gene were associated with higher fasting glucose (P = 0·009), lower HOMA-β (P = 0·03), and lower first-phase insulin response in OGTT (P = 0·03). Over an average follow-up period of 5·43 years, participants with the risk-conferring rs17584499 TT genotype in the PTPRD gene were more likely to progress from nondiabetes to diabetes than were noncarriers (hazard ratio: 8·82, P = 4 × 10(-5) ). The risk-conferring T allele in the PTPRD gene was associated with greater increase in homoeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (P = 0·04) over time. PTPRD gene expression in human adipose tissues was negatively associated with fasting insulin levels and HOMA-IR. Genetic variants near the KCNQ1 and MAF/WWOX genes are associated with reduced insulin secretion. The PTPRD genetic variant appears to be associated with progression to diabetes in Han Chinese, most likely through increased insulin resistance.

Insulin Resistance and Progression to Type 1 Diabetes in the European Nicotinamide Diabetes Intervention Trial (ENDIT)

The accelerator hypothesis proposes that type 1 and type 2 diabetes are both driven by insulin resistance (1), and its principle prediction is an inverse correlation between BMI and age at onset in children with type 1 diabetes. Bingley et al. (2) examined ENDIT data and found evidence for an inverse correlation only among those with advanced β-cell loss (low first-phase insulin response) (FPIR). They conclude that insulin …

Autoantibodies to IA-2β improve diabetes risk assessment in high-risk relatives

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of autoantibodies to IA-2beta (IA2betaA) in a large, well-characterised population of islet cell antibody (ICA)-positive relatives followed for 5 years in the European Nicotinamide Diabetes Intervention Trial. Autoantibodies to insulin (IAA), glutamate decarboxylase (GADA) and IA-2 (IA2A) were measured in 549 participants at study entry, and IA2A-positive samples tested for IA2betaA. First-phase insulin response (FPIR) and oral glucose tolerance were determined at baseline. Of 212 ICA/IA2A-positive participants (median age 12.1 years; 57% male), 113 developed diabetes (5 year cumulative risk 56%), and 148 were also GADA-positive and IAA-positive (4Ab-positive). IA2betaA were detected in 137 (65%) ICA/IA2A-positive participants and were associated with an increased 5 year diabetes risk (IA2betaA-positive 65 vs 39% in IA2betaA-negative, p=0.0002). The effect was most marked in 4Ab-positive relatives (72% vs 52%, p=0.003). Metabolic testing further refined risk assessment. Among 101 4Ab-positive relatives with IA2betaA, the 5 year risk was 94% in those with a low FPIR (vs 50% in those with a normal FPIR, p<0.0001), and 95% in those with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) (vs 66% in those with normal glucose tolerance, p<0.0001). The median time to diagnosis of 4Ab/IA2betaA-positive participants with a low FPIR was 1.5 years. Multivariate analysis confirmed IA2betaA status, antibody number, young age, FPIR and IGT as independent determinants of risk. IA2betaA are associated with a very high risk of diabetes in ICA/IA2A-positive relatives. Testing for IA2A/IA2betaA compares favourably with the IVGTT in identifying a subgroup of autoantibody-positive relatives at increased risk. IA2betaA determination should be added to screening protocols of future intervention trials.

EVALUATION OF GLUCOSE HOMEOSTASIS IN TRANSFUSION-DEPENDENT THALASSEMIC PATIENTS

Diabetes is an important problem encountered in thalassemic patients. The severity and type of glucose disturbances vary greatly in different studies. Also the pathogenesis seems to be complex; either insulin deficiency or insulin resistance may mediate the glucose disturbances. In a group of thalassemic patients glucose homeostasis was evaluated. Diabetes prevalence was 1.8%. Forty patients were investigated both with an oral glucose tolerance test and first-phase insulin response. Three patients had impaired fasting glucose, 1 patient had impaired glucose tolerance, and 2 patients had hyperinsulinism. Nineteen of 40 patients who were tested had low first-phase insulin response (47.5%) with below 10th centile. Age, BMI, height SDS, age at diagnosis, age at first blood transfusion, number of blood transfusions in a year, percentage of elevated liver enzyme, and hemoglobin and ferritin levels were not different between patients with low first-phase insulin response to patients with normal first-phase insulin response. Four patients are HCV infected, and only 1 of them had low first-phase insulin response. The study group showed a high rate of impairement in insulin secretion by first-phase insulin response to glucose overload, despite the low rate of insulin resistance. Defect of insulin secretion in thalassemic patients may develop earlier than insulin resistance, and then be accompanied by insulin resistance. Increasing insulin resistance with age and the occurrence of additional factors could lead to detoriation of glucose metabolism.

Pre-Type 1 Diabetes Dysmetabolism: Maximal Sensitivity Achieved with Both Oral and Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Testing

To determine the relationship of intravenous (IVGTT) and oral (OGTT) glucose tolerance tests abnormalities to diabetes development in a high-risk pre-diabetic cohort and to identify an optimal testing strategy for detecting preclinical diabetes. Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1 Diabetes (DPT-1) randomized subjects to oral (n = 372) and parenteral (n = 339) insulin prevention trials. Subjects were followed with IVGTTs and OGTTs. Factors associated with progression to diabetes were evaluated. Survival analysis revealed that higher quartiles of 2-hour glucose and lower quartiles of first phase insulin response (FPIR) at baseline were associated with decreased diabetes-free survival. Cox proportional hazards modeling showed that baseline body mass index (BMI), FPIR, and 2-hour glucose levels were significantly associated with an increased hazard for diabetes. On testing performed within 6 months of diabetes diagnosis, 3% (1/32) had normal FPIR and normal 2-hour glucose on OGTT. The sensitivities for impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and low FPIR performed within 6 months of diabetes diagnosis were equivalent (76% vs 73%). Most (97%) subjects had abnormal IVGTTs and/or OGTTs before the development of diabetes. The highest sensitivity is achieved using both tests.

No Evidence for Genetically Determined Alteration in Insulin Secretion or Sensitivity Predisposing to Type 1 Diabetes

To determine whether inherited changes in insulin secretion or sensitivity could predispose to type 1 diabetes, we studied identical twins of type 1 diabetic patients. We studied prospectively a consecutive series of 27 identical twins of patients with type 1 diabetes who were initially nondiabetic, as well as 14 control subjects, over a period of 18 years. Of these 27 twins, 15 remain nondiabetic (now estimated at low disease risk) and 12 developed diabetes (pre-diabetic twins). Subjects were tested when not diabetic on at least two occasions with an intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT), and we estimated insulin secretion as first-phase insulin response (FPIR), glucose clearance (K(g)), and insulin sensitivity both by homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and relative to insulin response by the basal HOMA-IR-to-FPIR ratio. Twins now at low risk and control subjects had similar fasting blood glucose and insulin levels, FPIR, K(g), HOMA-IR, and HOMA-IR-to-FPIR ratio. In contrast, pre-diabetic twins compared with control twins had higher fasting insulin levels (10.3 +/- 6.0 vs. 4.6 +/- 4.0 mIU/ml), lower FPIR (245 +/- 129 vs. 796 +/- 622 mIU . ml(-1) . 10 min(-1)), lower K(g) (1.5 +/- 0.6 vs. 2.6 +/- 0.8% per min), and higher HOMA-IR-to-FPIR ratio (0.007 +/- 0.005 vs. 0.001 +/- 0.0009) (all P < 0.01). These observations in low-risk nondiabetic identical twins failed to identify a familial alteration in either insulin secretion or sensitivity predisposing to type 1 diabetes.

Natural course of preclinical type 1 diabetes in siblings of affected children.

To define the dynamics of preclinical type 1 diabetes in siblings of affected children and to characterize the siblings experiencing a progressive process. From 801 families taking part in the "Childhood Diabetes in Finland" (DiMe) Study, 715 initially unaffected siblings were graded into four stages of preclinical type 1 diabetes based on the initial number of disease-associated autoantibodies detectable close to the time of diagnosis of the index case, while another classification system covering 641 of the siblings was based on a combination of the initial number of antibodies and the first-phase insulin response (FPIR) to intravenous glucose. Based on the first classification, there was a total of 95 siblings with initial signs of prediabetes, out of whom 34 (36%) progressed, 26 (27%) remained stable and 35 (37%) regressed during prospective observation for a median of 3.6 y (range 0.01-9.8 y). The siblings who progressed were younger, had a higher initial number of detectable autoantibodies, higher initial levels of various antibodies, with the exception of insulin autoantibodies, lower FPIR and a retarded glucose elimination rate in the first intravenous glucose tolerance test as compared with those that regressed. According to the second classification there were 41 siblings with initial signs of prediabetes, among whom 23 (56%) progressed, 14 (34%) remained stable and 4 (10%) regressed during the observation period. These data show that almost half of the siblings with signs of prediabetes at the time of diagnosis of the index case progressed further in their preclinical disease process during prospective observation. Young age, a strong humoral immune response to beta-cell antigens and reduced insulin secretory capacity appeared to be characteristic of those with a progressive process. Advanced and late prediabetes seem to represent a point of no return, as regression from these stages to no prediabetes was extremely rare.

Prediabetes in Children

The clinical manifestation of type 1 diabetes mellitus is preceded by an asymptomatic prodromal period called prediabetes or preclinical diabetes. It may last from a few months to several years, during which the autoimmune destruction of the insulin-producing beta-cells in the pancreas progresses. The genes on the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and insulin gene region are major genetic determinants for genetic disease susceptibility, while dietary compounds and viral infections are the most likely environmental factors contributing to the etiopathogenesis. T cells are thought to be the effector cells for the beta-cell destruction, and glutamic acid decarboxylase, insulinoma-associated protein 2 and insulin represent the three major autoantigens. Autoantibodies are early detectable markers of an ongoing disease process and are used to diagnose prediabetes. Among first-degree relatives of patients with type 1 diabetes, the risk for clinical disease can be graded from <5% in those with one or no antibodies to >90% in individuals who carry the HLA-DQB1*02/0302 risk genotype and are positive for multiple autoantibodies. beta-Cell function may also be tested in autoantibody-positive individuals and low first-phase insulin response is highly predictive for rapid progression to the clinical disease. However, dynamic course and individual variation of the disease process complicates the disease prediction, and it is not known whether all individuals with signs of prediabetes will inevitably progress to clinical type 1 diabetes. Until clinically applicable prevention for the condition exists, the screening for the risk markers of type 1 diabetes should actively be undertaken only in the context of research projects. Several major national and international multicenter studies are ongoing to test the potential of various agents (e.g. insulin and nicotinamide) or early elimination of dietary compounds (e.g. cow's milk proteins) to delay or prevent the onset of clinical type 1 diabetes.

Immunologic Issues in Type 1 Diabetes

This is the second in a series of reports on the American Diabetes Association (ADA) 61st Scientific Sessions held in Philadelphia, PA, in June 2001. It covers topics related to immunity and type 1 diabetes. Jay Skyler, Miami, FL, presented the results of the parenteral substudy arm of the Diabetes Prevention Trial for Type 1 Diabetes (DPT-1), in which relatives of patients with type 1 diabetes, whose risk of type 1 diabetes is 10- to 20-fold greater than that of the general population, were screened for islet cell antibodies (ICAs) and enrolled in a study of insulin administration if they showed high risk of developing diabetes. Animal studies in female nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice have shown this to be an effective treatment, and in the early 1990s, Keller et al. (1) reported a pilot study of 12 individuals with a predicted risk of diabetes; 5 subjects were treated with insulin and 7 subjects declined treatment. By 2.5 years, all of those who declined treatment had developed diabetes; at 5 years, only half of the intervention group had the disease. The DPT-1 was initiated in 1993. Screening began in February 1994 and randomization began in January 1995; 339 subjects were enrolled, with follow-up ending 13 April 2001. Screening of 89,827 relatives, with 84,228 samples analyzed, showed that 3,152 (3.7%) were ICA positive. A total of 2,103 subjects were staged, 535 having low first-phase insulin response. Of 372 subjects who were eligible for randomization, 339 were randomized. Skyler pointed out that 354 of the 3,152 ICA-positive individuals had actually already developed diabetes, with 156 identified before further testing. The projected annual event rate was 21%, and the actual finding was of 15.1% developing diabetes (in addition to those developing diabetes before randomization). Of the patients who developed diabetes, 60% were sibs, 25% …

Type I diabetes manifested solely by 2-h oral glucose tolerance test criteria.

The clinical presentation of type 1 diabetes usually involves symptoms such as polyuria and polydipsia. However, investigators in the Diabetes Prevention Trial of Type 1 Diabetes (DPT-1) have detected a group of subjects with type 1 diabetes who have a different phenotype. These subjects are asymptomatic, have normal (<6.1 mmol/l) (group A) or impaired (6.1- <7.0 mmol/l) (group B) fasting glucose, but have 2-h glucose values >11.1 mmol/l on their oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT). Of the 585 OGTTs performed on islet cell antibody (ICA)-positive relatives with insulin autoantibodies (IAA) or low first-phase insulin response (FPIR), normal glucose tolerance (NGT) was found in 427 subjects; impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) was found in 87 subjects, and diabetes was found by 2-h OGTT criteria alone in 61 subjects. Despite marked differences in 2-h glucose values (NGT 5.8 +/- 1.1 mmol/l, IGT 8.9 +/- 0.9 mmol/l, and group A 13.5 +/- 2.5 mmol/l), there were no significant differences in fasting glucose values among NGT (4.8 +/- 0.5 mmol/l), IGT (5.03 +/- 0.5 mmol/l), and group A (4.99 +/- 0.7 mmol/l) categories. Mean FPIR was higher in subjects with NGT compared with subjects with IGT and subjects diagnosed by 2-h OGTT criteria alone. However, the correlation between FPIR and 2-h glucose value was low (r2 = 0.114). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that additional independent variables provide smaller contributions to the 2-h glucose value. In conclusion, there are asymptomatic type 1 diabetic subjects whose diabetes was diagnosed by the 2-h criteria on OGTT alone. Despite the importance of beta-cell dysfunction in the pathogenesis of type I diabetes, factors other than impaired FPIR must also contribute to postprandial glucose tolerance in these subjects.

Pathogenic factors of glucose intolerance in obese Japanese adolescents with type 2 diabetes

We attempted to identify the pathogenic factors involved in the progression to type 2 diabetes in obese Japanese adolescents. Subjects included 18 nondiabetic obese adolescents, 12 obese adolescents with type 2 diabetes on diet therapy, 10 obese adolescents with type 2 diabetes manifesting ketosis at onset or with a history of treatment with hypoglycemic agents, and 26 non-obese adolescent control subjects. The first-phase insulin response (FPIR), glucose disappearance constant (Kg), glucose effectiveness (Sg), and insulin sensitivity (S(I)) were obtained using an insulin-modified frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGT) and a minimal model analysis. The disposition index (DI, by FPIR x S(I)) was determined to assess any endogenous insulin effect. The results showed that Kg was decreased significantly (P = .0006) with the progression to severe diabetes in the obese groups. Although S(I) and Sg did not differ significantly among the 3 obese groups, both parameters were significantly lower in each obese group versus the non-obese controls. As a result of the significant decrease in FPIR (P < .0001), the DI decreased (P = .0006) with the progression to severe diabetes in the obese groups. In conclusion, an early manifestation of type 2 diabetes with occasional ketosis at onset may result from beta-cell dysfunction to glucose stimulation. This finding is demonstrated by the relatively low FPIR to decreased S(I) in obese Japanese adolescents, as well as the low Sg as a synergic role in glucose intolerance. The present findings from a Japanese population for pathogenic factors aside from obesity may help us to gain a better understanding of the progression to adolescent, early-onset, obese type 2 diabetes and its severity.

Aberrant prostaglandin synthase 2 expression defines an antigen-presenting cell defect for insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Prostaglandins (PGs) are lipid molecules that profoundly affect cellular processes including inflammation and immune response. Pathways contributing to PG output are highly regulated in antigen-presenting cells such as macrophages and monocytes, which produce large quantities of these molecules upon activation. In this report, we demonstrate aberrant constitutive expression of the normally inducible cyclooxygenase PG synthase 2 (PGS(2)/ COX-2) in nonactivated monocytes of humans with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) and those with islet autoantibodies at increased risk of developing this disease. Constitutive PGS(2) appears to characterize a high risk for diabetes as it correlates with and predicts a low first-phase insulin response in autoantibody-positive subjects. Abnormal PGS(2) expression in at-risk subjects affected immune response in vitro, as the presence of a specific PGS(2) inhibitor, NS398, significantly increased IL-2 receptor alpha-chain (CD25) expression on phytohemagglutinin-stimulated T cells. The effect of PGS(2) on CD25 expression was most profound in subjects expressing both DR04 and DQbeta0302 high-risk alleles, suggesting that this cyclooxygenase interacts with diabetes-associated MHC class II antigens to limit T-cell activation. These results indicate that constitutive PGS(2) expression in monocytes defines an antigen-presenting cell defect affecting immune response, and that this expression is a novel cell-associated risk marker for IDDM.