Lower Extremity Functional Scale Research Articles

Hindi version of the lower extremity functional scale: a study of translation, validation and cross-cultural adaptation

BACKGROUND: Lower Extremity Function Scale (LEFS) serves as a patient-reported outcome measure, used to evaluate the functional status of lower extremity in different musculoskeletal conditions. It was originally developed in English language (E-LEFS) and numerous translations in different languages are available to measure its usability among different cultures. OBJECTIVES: To translate the English version of the Lower Extremity Function Scale (E-LEFS) into Hindi language and to evaluate its content validity, cross-cultural adaptation along with the concurrent validity and reliability. METHOD: Process of forward and backward translation was carried out by two bilingual translators and a physiotherapist after obtaining developer’s approval, for which the Beaton guidelines were used. For the content validation, Delphi method of was employed in which 12 field experts of more than 5 years of experience participated. Cultural adaptation procedures were then carried out with 12 patients, who reported in out-patient department of the hospital through convenience sampling who were asked about whether the H-LEFS was well understood by the patients. Their responses were recorded as positive and negative responses. This process was followed by concurrent validation which was conducted by comparing the scores with the SF-36 scale, involving 30 patients with activity limitation in their daily life. Lastly, 50 patients were recruited for intra-rater reliability testing. RESULT: The scale was successfully translated and verified by the bi-lingual language experts. Content validity came out to be significant with each item scoring more than 0.92. Nearly all items, excluding item no. 8, 16, 17, 18, and 19 received universal agreement with a content validity ratio of 1. The average scale-level validity stood at 0.98, indicating excellent level of validity and the scale was found to be well adapted by the native people as out of 12 patients, 10 patients provided 100% positive response. Concurrent validation using Pearson’s correlation coefficient came out excellent with the values of 0.993 for E-LEFS and 0.890 for SF-36. Cronbach's alpha and ICC values were calculated as 1.00 for Intra-rater reliability. CONCLUSION: LEFS was well translated into Hindi language with an excellent content and concurrent validity and is found to be highly reliable. Hence, it is recommended for the usage of native Hindi speaking population.

Translate and cross-culturally adapt the original English version of the lower extremity functional scale into the Sinhalese version

Objectives: Functional ability is critical for quality of life (QOF), and its evaluation is vital in a clinical context. However, there is a deficiency of a universally recognized grading scale in Sinhala for assessing functional capacity in athletes with lower extremity musculoskeletal conditions. This research aimed to validate the linguistic and cross-cultural adaptation of a translated Sinhala version of the lower extremity functional scale (S-LEFS). Materials and Methods: A two-stage observational study was conducted. The lower extremity functional scale was cross-culturally adapted to Sinhala through independent, double forward, and backward translation. An experienced clinical researcher tested the translated version to establish the linguistic validation of S-LEFS. The finalized version was validated for construct, convergent, and criterion validity. A total of 112 participants, comprising 57 healthy (50.89%) and 55 unhealthy (49.11%) lower limb athletes, completed S-LEFS. Results: S-LEFS demonstrated excellent reliability with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.952. Exploratory factor analysis revealed good factor loadings (>0.48) for all 20 items, with three components accounting for 70.63% of cumulative variance. Scale got a sensitivity of 87.5% and specificity of 81% at a cutoff point of 67.5. Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value was 0.918 (P < 0.0001), and Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity was significant (P < 0.01). No correlation was detected between S-LEFS and World Health Organization QOF-Bref (r = 0.281). Conclusion: S-LEFS is a reliable and valid tool for evaluating lower limb function in athletes.

Gender differences in effects of Graston technique, active release technique, and PNF stretching on hamstring flexibility in knee osteoarthritis

Aims. To seek gender differences among the effects of the Graston Technique (GT), Active Release Technique (ART), and Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) stretching on hamstring flexibility, pain, lower extremity function, and physical function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Materials and methods. A multicenter, single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 45 patients – aged above 30 years with knee osteoarthritis – randomly allocated to three equal groups: Group-A (GT), Group-B (ART), and Group C (PNF). Each group received 12 physiotherapy sessions over a four-week intervention period (3 visits per week). Data were collected before and after rehabilitation using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Active Knee Extension Test, Lower Extremity Function Scale, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). Results. A statistically significant interaction between the effects of gender and Active Release Technique on lower extremity function was present (p < 0.001) with males (42.4 ± 2.2) showed more improvement than females (35.6 ± 6.6). On the contrary, females showed more improvement (p < 0.001) than males when Graston Technique and PNF techniques were applied. Conclusion. There were no significant gender-based differences among GT, ART, and PNF regarding pain, hamstring flexibility and WOMAC score. However, males showed significantly more improvement in lower extremity function than females with ART, and females showed more improvement in lower extremity function as compared to males with GT and PNF.

Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes after Local Flap Coverage versus Amputation for Complex Lower Extremity Trauma

Abstract Background There is a paucity of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) data in lower extremity salvage. Limb salvage can often be achieved with the use of local muscle flaps or fasciocutaneous flaps. The purpose of this study was to compare PROs of patients who underwent lower extremity salvage using local fasciocutaneous flaps or muscle flaps to lower extremity amputation. Materials and Methods The outcomes of 61 patients that underwent lower extremity local flap reconstruction (n = 33) or amputation (n = 28) between 2014 and 2020 were recorded. Chart reviews were performed to collect perioperative data. Patients were contacted via telephone for participation in the survey portion of our study. PROs were recorded utilizing both the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Results Surveys were completed by 61 patients (response rate 59.2%). The mean time of survey after flap reconstruction or amputation was 2.7 ± 1.4 years. Recent trauma (within 90 days) was the most common indication for local flap coverage (n = 23). LEFS score and SF-36 physical functioning scores were significantly lower in patients who underwent muscle flaps compared with fasciocutaneous flaps (p = 0.021 and p = 0.022). Muscle flap patients had similar LEFS and SF-36 scores to amputation patients, while fasciocutaneous flap patients had significantly higher LEFS (p = 0.01), SF-36 physical functioning (p = 0.031), physical role functioning (p = 0.031), and emotional role functioning (p = 0.047) scores than amputation patients. Conclusion Patients who underwent local fasciocutaneous flaps for limb salvage reported higher PRO scores than those undergoing amputation, while patients undergoing muscle flaps reported outcomes similar to those undergoing amputation. PROs for muscle flap patients were significantly lower than those of fasciocutaneous flap patients. These data suggest that while fasciocutaneous and muscle flaps are both useful limb salvage procedures, fasciocutaneous flaps may confer advantages that result in improved patient-perceived outcomes. Further study is needed to better characterize outcomes in limb salvage.

Applying 3D-Printed Porous Ti6Al4V Prostheses to Repair Osteomyelitis-Induced Partial Bone Defects of Lower Limbs: Finite Element Analysis and Clinical Outcomes.

The clinical management of partial bone defects in lower limbs, particularly those resulting from osteomyelitis, remains a significant challenge. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of 3D-printed porous Ti6Al4V prostheses in addressing osteomyelitis-induced partial bone defects. We established a comprehensive protocol for utilizing 3D-printed prostheses for bone defect repair, encompassing 3D simulation of prosthesis implantation and internal fixation, finite element analysis (FEA), and clinical implementation. Mimics software facilitated simulation of fixation patterns and screw lengths. FEA modeled bone defects in the distal metaphyseal femur and distal diaphyseal tibia to assess changes in stress conduction pre- and post-prosthesis implantation. The clinical study involved eight patients (average age: 56.3 years) with an average defect length of 14.9 cm. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated using X-rays and the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS). FEA demonstrated that the implanted prostheses effectively shared stress and reduced the load on residual bone in both models, thus lowering the risk of fractures under external forces. The average follow-up period was 24.5 months, with patients initiating weight-bearing activities on average 7.8 days post-surgery. Serial postoperative X-rays demonstrated long-term stability of the prostheses, with progressive bone regeneration around and integration with the prostheses. While two patients experienced infection recurrence requiring prosthesis removal and debridement, the remaining six showed significant improvement in LEFS scores, increasing from 31.5 preoperatively to 61.0 at the last follow-up. 3D-printed porous Ti6Al4V prostheses effectively restore anatomical integrity and optimize stress conduction in lower limbs, resulting in substantial functional recovery. This innovative approach shows promise for wider clinical adoption and warrants further investigation in medical practice.

The effects of balance training in patients with total hip arthroplasty : Arandomized controlled pilot study.

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) causes damage to hip joint mechanoceptors, which in turn leads to decrease in proprioception and increase in balance disorders. Few research has focused on balance training in patients with arthroplasty and none investigated the long-term effect of balance training using objective balance assessment methods in THA patients. The purpose of our study was to investigate the effects of balance training in patients with THA until 26 weeks postoperatively. For this study 24 patients with hip osteoarthritis, who were candidates for THA were recruited. Of the patients with THA 16completed the study protocol and the patients were randomized to 2groups: conventional rehabilitation (CR, n = 8) or conventional rehabilitation plus balance training (CR + BT, n = 8). The CR group completed typical surgery-specific exercise programs, while the CR + BT group completed the CR plus balance exercises. The patients were evaluated by ahand-held dynamometer, single leg stance test (SLST), Tetrax balance system, Harris hip score, lower extremity function scale, 5times sit to stand test and 50-foot timed walk test preoperatively and 8, 14 and 26 weeks postoperatively. While the CR + BT group showed significant improvement for the right extremity eyes closed SLST score (p < 0.05), there was no significant difference for other assessment parameters between the CR and CR + BT groups (p > 0.05). There were significant improvements in both groups until 26 weeks following THA (p < 0.05). The results of our study indicate that there were similar improvements in the balance and functional parameters in the CR and CR + BT groups. There was no additional benefit after 26 weeks of controlled balance exercises following THA.

Differentiated Approach to Surgical ­Treatment of Gunshot Diaphyseal Shin Fractures

Background. The roots of problems in the treatment of gunshot fractures to extremities lay in the high-energetic character of these traumas, the frequency of infectious complications, high rate of slow consolidations, and occurrence of pseudoarthroses and bone tissue lesions. Objective. The objective of the study was to improve the treatment results of patients with gunshot fractures of the shin bones based on the development of a differentiated approach to the treatment of such injuries. Material and Methods. The study is based on the results of examination and treatment of 128 patients with dominant combat shin traumas. The patients were divided into two groups. The first group (control group) included 68 patients who underwent treatment with an external fixation device (EFD). The second group (study group) included 60 patients who underwent the extrafocal osteosynthesis replaced by an internal, mostly intramedullary one. To assess the functional outcomes of treatment, we applied the LEFS (Lower Extremity Functional Scale) in the dynamics of the therapy, namely in 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after the injury. Results. Mean values in both groups during the first two to three weeks showed no statistically significant difference, and their average score according to the LEFS scale was 15.75 points. The most significant differences were observed in the period from 6 to 12 months after the injury, 39.4±2.4 (EFD) and 57.3±2.1 (intramedullary nailing). After 18 months, excellent results showed 20.7% of patients from the study group and 15.8% of the control group (61 – 80 LEFS scores). Good results had 43.2% and 33.1%, respectively (41 – 60 LEFS scores). 28.1% and 39.3%, respectively, showed satisfactory results (21 – 40 LEFS scores). Poor results showed 8.0% of patients of the study group and 11.8% of the control group (p&lt;0.05). Conclusions. The analysis of treatment outcomes of patients with gunshot diaphyseal shin fractures demonstrates that conversion, when used according to indications and following criteria to the replacement of the method of fixation, reduces the incidence of complications in both the early and late postoperative periods, fastens consolidation of gunshot diaphyseal shin fractures by 4.5±2.3 weeks, reduces the frequency of fracture consolidation disorders by 10.6%, and improves the functional results of the patients by 15.0%.

Outpatient Physiotherapy for Immune-Mediated Necrotizing Myositis With a Positive Outcome: Must Pathology Equal Dysfunction? A Case Report

BACKGROUND: Necrotizing myositis (NM) is a rare autoimmune systemic condition leading to skeletal muscle destruction visualized on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The prognosis is severe progressive muscle weakness leading to functional mobility decline. This case study described outpatient physiotherapy management of NM, not hitherto reported, and the unanticipated outcomes given the diagnosis and MRI findings. CASE PRESENTATION: A 77-year-old female was diagnosed with NM, confirmed on MRI significant for abnormal T2 signal in all muscular compartments of both lower extremities, after 4 months of progressive limb weakness had prevented her from walking independently. Outpatient physiotherapy began 10 months after diagnosis. Examination revealed spinal and peripheral joint hypomobility, lower limb weakness (1 repetition, 30s sit to stand-30STS), functional limitation (14/80, Lower Extremity Functional Scale [LEFS]), and slow gait with rollator. The physiotherapy diagnosis was that musculoskeletal impairments contributed to movement dysfunction, leading to 18 manual therapy and exercise treatments over 19 weeks. OUTCOMES AND FOLLOW-UP: Strength (8 repetition 30STS) and function (49/80 LEFS) improved beyond minimal clinical important differences and gait speed at discharge approximated age-sex-matched normal. DISCUSSION: For this NM case, strength and function improved despite confirmed muscle necrosis and prognosis of progressive muscle degradation after addressing modifiable musculoskeletal impairments. JOSPT Cases 2024;4(4):1-7. Epub 7 October 2024. doi:10.2519/josptcases.2024.0064

Does a Concise Patient-reported Outcome Measure Provide a Valid Measure of Physical Function for Cancer Patients After Lower Extremity Surgery?

Current functional assessment tools for orthopaedic oncology are long surveys that contribute to patients' survey fatigue and yet lack the ability to discern meaningful differences in a patient population that is often mobile but unable to perform strenuous activities. We sought to determine whether a shorter, novel tool based on existing, validated surveys could better capture differences in a sample of orthopaedic oncology patients. (1) Can a concise fixed-item functional tool derived from the 50 items in the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score for the lower extremity (TESS LE) and the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) demonstrate similar responsiveness in terms of sensitivity and specificity? (2) What is the precision and accuracy of the concise tool compared with the TESS LE and LEFS? Functional outcome data were collected and maintained in a longitudinally maintained database at a single institution. Patients were included in the study if (1) they had undergone a tumor excision or a nononcologic orthopaedic procedure (for example, arthroplasty for osteoarthritis) for a bone or soft tissue tumor affecting lower extremity function, and (2) they had completed the LEFS, TESS LE, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) global health tool on at least two clinic visits. Between September 2014 and April 2022, we treated 14,234 patients for primary bone or soft tissue sarcoma, metastatic disease to bone, or orthopaedic sequelae of chronic cancer care. Approximately 6% (854 of 14,234) were excluded due to the need of a language translator. Approximately 2% (278 of 13,380) refused or were unable to participate. Seventy-two percent (9433 of 13,102) of the patients had an operation on a lower extremity. Of these, 4% (339 of 9433) of the patients completed the TESS LE, LEFS, and Item 3 of the PROMIS global health tool on ≥ 2 clinic visits. Of the patients in the current study, 49% (167 of 339) were women, and 27% (93 of 339) had metastatic carcinoma. Twelve percent (41 of 339) of the patients died before the end of the study period. Spearman rank-order correlation, principal component analysis (PCA), and item response theory (IRT) modeling identified 14 highly discriminating items from the TESS LE and LEFS. Multiple linear stepwise regression (MLSR) was performed with the dependent variable being the summary score of the 14 items derived from the TESS LE and LEFS and standardized to a percentage of 100. The beta coefficient from the MLSR was used to derive a weight for each of the 14 items. Evaluation of the model with 10 to 17 variables was performed to ensure that the model with the 14 items met the most criteria for fit with the PCA, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and the IRT modeling criteria. The responsiveness (sensitivity and specificity) of the change scores in the shortened 14-item survey, the 30-item TESS LE, and the 20-item LEFS as compared with the dichotomized changes in Item 3 of the PROMIS global health tool was evaluated using ROCs. The concordance (accuracy and precision) of the 14 items derived from the LEFS and TESS LE was evaluated. The responsiveness (sensitivity and specificity) of the shortened 14-item survey, the TESS LE, and the LEFS to the criterion target of the PROMIS global health tool (Item 3) was similar, with areas under the curve (AUCs) ranging from 0.62 to 0.65 for the ROC curves. The responsiveness of the 14-item survey to the TESS LE showed sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 90%, with an AUC of 0.98 (p < 0.001). The responsiveness of the 14 items to the LEFS showed sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 86%, with an AUC of 0.96. The validity of the 14 items to the TESS LE was measured by concordance, with a precision of 0.98 and an accuracy of 0.97. Concordance of the 14 items to the LEFS showed a precision of 0.98 and accuracy of 0.83. The concise 14 items derived from patient-reported responses in the TESS LE and LEFS outcome measures showed similar responsiveness (sensitivity and specificity) as the original TESS LE and LEFS for cancer patients after lower extremity orthopaedic surgery performed for oncologic and nononcologic indications. The concise 14 items have a similar ability to the TESS LE and LEFS to tell the clinician or patient how they are functioning compared with other patients. These 14 items are shorter than the combined 50 items of the TESS LE and LEFS while retaining the capacity to describe a broad range of lower extremity function for orthopaedic oncology patients. We have named the 14-item survey the Lower Extremity Oncology Functional Assessment Tool.Level of Evidence Level II, diagnostic study.

A Comparative Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Free Tissue Transfer, Partial Foot Amputation, and Below-Knee Amputation in High-Risk Limb Salvage Patients.

The surgical decision for limb-salvage with free tissue transfer (FTT), partial foot amputation (PFA), or below-knee amputation (BKA) for complex lower extremity (LE) wounds hinges on several factors, including patient choice and baseline function. However, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) on LE function, pain, and QoL for chronic LE wound interventions are limited. Thus, the study aim was to compare PROMs in patients who underwent FTT, PFA, or BKA for chronic LE wounds. PROMs were collected via QR code for all adult chronic LE wound patients who presented to a tertiary wound center between June 2022 and June 2023. A cross-sectional analysis of patients who underwent FTT, PFA, or BKA was conducted. The 12-Item Short Survey (SF-12), PROM Information System Pain Intensity (PROMIS-3a), and Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) were completed at 1, 3, and 6 months and 1, 3, and 5 years postoperatively. Patient demographics, comorbidities, preoperative characteristics, and amputation details were collected. Of 200 survey sets, 71 (35.5%) underwent FTT, 51 (25.5%) underwent PFA, and 78 (39.0%) underwent BKA. Median postoperative time points of survey completion between FTT (6.2 months, IQR: 23.1), PFA (6.8 months, IQR: 15.5), and BKA (11.1 months, IQR: 21.3) patients were comparable (P = 0.8672). Most patients were male (n = 92, 76.0%) with an average age and body mass index (BMI) of 61.8 ± 12.6 years and 30.3 ± 7.0 kg/m2, respectively. Comorbidities for FTT, PFA, and BKA patients included diabetes mellitus (DM; 60.6% vs 84.2% vs 69.2%; P = 0.165), peripheral vascular disease (PVD; 48.5% vs 47.4% vs 42.3%; P = 0.790), and chronic kidney disease (CKD; 12.1% vs 42.1% vs 30.8%; P = 0.084). No significant differences were observed between FTT, PFA, and BKA patients in mean overall PROMIS-3a T-scores (49.6 ± 14.8 vs 54.2 ± 11.8 vs 49.6 ± 13.7; P = 0.098), LEFS scores (37.5 ± 18.0 vs 34.6 ± 18.3 vs 38.5 ± 19.4; P = 0.457), or SF-12 scores (29.6 ± 4.1 vs 29.5 ± 2.9 vs 29.0 ± 4.0; P = 0.298). Patients receiving FTT, PFA, or BKA for chronic LE wounds achieve comparable levels of LE function, pain, and QoL postoperatively. Patient-centered functionally based surgical management for chronic LE wounds using interdisciplinary care, preoperative medical optimization, and proper patient selection optimizes postoperative PROMs.

Failed labral reconstruction of the hip can be successfully revised to another labral reconstruction: improved patient-reported outcomes at a minimum of 2-year follow-up

Abstract The purpose of this study was to validate the success of revision arthroscopic circumferential allograft labral reconstruction (CLR) in nonarthritic hips, which, in the rare case of failure, had previously undergone labral reconstruction by the same surgeon. Using a minimum of 24-month follow-up, data from 24 hips having undergone revision CLR were analyzed to determine improvements in patient-reported outcomes (PROs). All included cases completed a minimum of 24 months follow-up, with a success rate of 96%. All PROs improved significantly, with exceptionally strong measures of effect. Modified Harris Hip Scores improved by a mean of 26.68 points, with 88% of patients meeting the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) (+6.49, P ≤ .001, d = 1.32). Lower Extremity Functional Scale scores improved by a mean of 21.88 points, with 78% of patients meeting the MCID (+7.79, P ≤ .001, d = 1.32). Pain as rated by the Visual Analog Scale, including at rest, during activities of daily living, and with sports, was significantly improved with strong measures of effect, with &amp;gt;75% of patients having met the MCID. This study validated that a failed labral reconstruction of the hip can be revised safely and effectively to another labral reconstruction of the hip. While labral reconstruction has broadly been shown to result in highly favorable outcomes, this study demonstrated that in the rare case of failure, revision CLR is not only feasible but results in improved pain and functionality.

Residual Deformity and Outcome in Non-Surgically Treated Tibial Shaft Fractures in Adolescents Nearing Skeletal Maturity

Background. Anatomic reduction is crucial to avoid malalignment in tibial shaft fractures in adolescents approaching physeal closure. While surgical treatment is becoming more common, casting and immobilization are still widely done for appropriately selected fractures. Local radiographic and clinical outcomes of non-surgical treatment need to be explored. Objective. The primary objective of this study was to report residual lower limb deformity of tibial shaft fractures treated non-surgically in adolescents nearing skeletal maturity. The study also identified factors or fracture characteristics that may predict these deformities and reported the clinical outcomes using the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS). Methodology. This was a cross-sectional study of 31 adolescents nearing skeletal maturity at the time of injury with acute closed tibial shaft fractures treated non-surgically at the Philippine Orthopedic Center from 2017 to 2020. Skeletal maturity and residual sagittal &amp; coronal angulation were analyzed through radiographs. Rotational alignment and leg length discrepancies were evaluated clinically. Functional outcome was measured using the LEFS. Results. Coronal plane angulation (r = -0.397; p = 0.05) and leg length discrepancy (r = -0.394; p = 0.05) were inversely correlated with LEFS scores. Coronal plane angulation was also correlated with ipsilateral fibular fractures (p = 0.007). LEFS scores were 79.39 on average (range 75 to 80). Conclusion. Among adolescents nearing skeletal maturity with isolated acute tibial shaft fractures, closed reduction and casting followed by close monitoring remains useful and effective.

Modified trochanteric triplane osteotomy for chronic moderate to severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis - a preliminary report.

Management of chronic moderate and severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) remains controversial. We propose that the modified trochanteric triplane osteotomy(MTTO) with a 1300 angled blade plate, without removal of bone wedge, is effective for addressing moderate and severe chronic SCFE. A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent MTTO for moderate to severe chronic SCFE, with at least two years follow-up. Radiological outcomes assessed were osteotomy union, alpha angle, neck shaft angle, mechanical axis deviation and limb length discrepancy(LLD). Functional outcomes were assessed using modified Harris hip score, lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) and SF-36 questionnaire. A total of 11 patients (13 hips) underwent MTTO for chronic SCFE, with a mean age of 12.9 ± 2.1 years. The pre-operative median modified Harris Hip Score was 73. 12 had severe slip and one had moderate slip. All the osteotomies went on to unite by two months. At an average of 37 months follow up, the mean neck shaft angle was 1290, mean alpha angle was 69.70, and mean LLD was 1.05cm. There was significant improvement in the post-operative modified Harris hip score (p < 0.001), the median post-operative modified Harris hip score was 96, and the median LEFS was 78. One case had bone scan evidence of AVN, but did well with bisphosphonate therapy and one case had a superficial infection. MTTO is a safe and effective option for addressing deformities in chronic moderate and severe SCFE. However, a residual proximal femoral Cam deformity persists after this procedure which may need to be treated with a simultaneous or a staged osteochondroplasty.

Clinical application of iliac myocutaneous flap pedicled with deep circumflex iliac artery in repair of complex defect of lower limb with cavity

To explore the effectiveness of iliac myocutaneous flap pedicled with deep circumflex iliac artery (DCIA) on the repair of lower limb composite defect wounds with cavity. A retrospective analysis of 7 patients with lower limb composite defect wounds treated between March 2017 and September 2020 was conducted, including 4 males and 3 females, aged 24-58 years, with a median age of 37 years. The causes of injury were machine twisting injury in 2 cases, fall from height injury in 2 cases, and traffic accident injury in 3 cases. According to Gustilo-Anderson classification, there were 1 case of type Ⅲa, 4 cases of type Ⅲb, and 2 cases of type Ⅲc (combined with anterior tibial artery rupture); according to AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification, there were 2 cases of type 42-C3, 2 cases of type 43-A2, and 3 cases of type 43-B1. The time from injury to admission ranged from 2 to 10 hours, with an average of 6 hours. Tibial bone defect and surrounding soft tissue defect with deep cavity were left after primary emergency debridement. In the second stage, according to the characteristics of the wound, the three-dimensional repair of the composite defect was designed with DCIA embedded iliac myocutaneous flap. The size of the iliac flap was 2.0 cm×2.0 cm×2.0 cm to 7.0 cm×3.0 cm×2.5 cm, and the size of the flap was 12.0 cm×8.0 cm to 21.0 cm×13.0 cm. The internal oblique muscle flap was harvested in size of 3.0 cm×2.0 cm×2.0 cm to 5.5 cm×4.0 cm×4.0 cm. The donor site was primarily closed. All the flaps survived after operation, except for 1 case of partial necrosis of the flap edge, which healed after secondary skin grafting, and the donor and recipient wounds healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 16-24 months, with an average of 18 months. The broken end of the bone defect healed well, and the healing time was 8-10 months, with an average of 7.3 months. At last follow-up, the shape of the flap was satisfactory, the texture was soft, and there was no abnormal hair growth, pigmentation, and so on. Only linear scar was left in the donor site, and no complication such as abdominal hernia occurred. According to Paley fracture healing scoring system, bone healing was rated as excellent in 5 cases and good in 2 cases. The limb function was satisfactory, and full weight bearing was achieved at 12-16 months after operation. According to the lower extremity functional scale (LEFS), 6 cases were excellent and 1 case was good. The iliac myocutaneous flap pedicled with DCIA is flexible in design and highly free in tissue composition, which can repair the composite defect wound of lower limbs with deep cavity in a three-dimensional way, and repair the limb shape and reconstruct weight-bearing function to the greatest extent.

Long-term results and patient-reported outcomes after vascularized fibular graft use in the treatment of post-traumatic bone defects of femur shaft and tibia: A retrospective cohort and cross-sectional survey study

Post-traumatic critical-sized bone defects pose a reconstructive challenge for reconstructive surgeons. The vascularized fibula graft is a well-described treatment for osseous defects of the femur and tibia. This study aimed to assess long-term patient-reported quality of life, the success-, and complication rates in lower extremity reconstruction with vascularized fibula grafts. A retrospective cohort of 29 patients who underwent fibula graft reconstruction for critical-sized bone defects after post-traumatic tibial and femoral bone loss between 1990 and 2021 was included. To assess the health-related quality of life and return to work and satisfaction, a cross-sectional survey was performed using the short-form-36, lower extremity functional scale, and a self-made questionnaire including the DN4, satisfaction, and subjective ankle function. The median bone defect size was 8cm (IQR 9-7cm). The mental component scores were comparable to the Dutch population norm, whereas the impaired physical function scores were associated with pain (r 0.849, p<0.001). Neuropathic symptoms were reported in 7 out of 19 patients, and 11 out of 19 patients returned to normal daily activity. All respondents reported positive or neutral scores on overall satisfaction with the recovery. Bone healing was uneventful in 19 out of 29 patients. Union was achieved in 25 out of 29 patients. Persistent nonunion was observed in 4 patients, leading to amputation in 2 patients. Vascularized fibula graft use led to high union rates and limb salvage in patients with post-traumatic segmental bone loss of the tibia and femur. Patient satisfaction with the overall recovery was positive; however, functional outcomes remained impaired.

The Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Italian Version of the Hip and Groin Outcome Score Questionnaire for a Young and Active Population.

The HAGOS (Hip and Groin Outcome Score) questionnaire is a valid and reliable measure of the self-assessment of symptoms, activity limitation, participation restriction, and quality of life (Qol) of subjects with hip and/or groin pain. The aims of this study are to translate and transculturally adapt the HAGOS into Italian (HAGOS-I) and to assess its internal consistency, validity, and reliability in physically active, young, and middle-aged subjects. The translation and transcultural adaptation of (HAGOS-I) was carried out according to international guidelines. Eight-one subjects (mean age 28.19) were included in this study. All the participants completed the HAGOS-I, the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS-I), the Oxford Hip Score (OHS-I), and the Short Form 36 Health Surveys (SF-36-I). The Cronbach's α for the six HAGOS subscales ranged from 0.63 to 0.87. Statistically significant correlations were obtained between the six HAGOS-I subscales and the LEFS-I (rs = 0.44-0.68; p < 0.01). Only one HAGOS-I subscale (Participation in Physical Activities) did not reach statistical significance with the OHS-I, while the remaining five had a moderate correlation (rs = 0.40-0.60; p < 0.01). The test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient) ranged from 0.57 to 0.86 for the six HAGOS-I subscales. The HAGOS-I is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used in clinical settings with young and middle-aged subjects with hip and/or groin pathologies.

The Impact of Blood Flow Restriction Training on Tibial Bone Stress Injury Rehabilitation: An Exploratory Case Series.

Lower extremity bone stress injuries (BSI) are common injuries among athletes and military members. Typical management involves a period of restricted weightbearing which can have rapid detrimental effects upon both muscle and bone physiology. Few studies have investigated the effect of blood flow restriction (BFR) training on bone in the rehabilitative setting. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of lower extremity exercise with the addition of BFR upon bone mineral density, bone mineral content, and lean body mass in military members with tibial BSIs. Case series. Twenty military members with MRI-confirmed tibial BSI were recruited to complete lower extremity exercise with the addition of BFR twice per week for four weeks. The BFR cuff was applied proximally to the participant's involved limb while they performed gluteal, thigh, and leg resistance exercises. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and four weeks. The primary outcomes were whole leg bone mineral density (BMD), bone mineral content (BMC), and lean body mass (LM) as measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Secondary outcomes included thigh and leg circumference measures and patient-reported outcomes, including the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 57 (PROMIS-57), and Global Rating of Change (GROC). No significant differences were found in BMD (p=0.720) or BMC (p=0.749) between limbs or within limbs over time. LM was generally less in the involved limb (p=0.019), however there were no significant differences between or within limbs over time (p=0.404). For thigh circumference, significant main effects were found for time (p=0.012) and limb (p=0.015), however there was no significant interaction effect (p=0.510). No significant differences were found for leg circumference (p=0.738). Participants showed significant mean changes in LEFS (15.15 points), PROMIS physical function (8.98 points), PROMIS social participation (7.60 points), PROMIS anxiety (3.26 points), and PROMIS pain interference (8.39 points) at four weeks. The utilization of BFR in the early rehabilitative management of tibial BSI may help mitigate decrements in both bone and muscle tissue during periods of decreased physical loading. 4.

Hip Labral Repair versus Reconstruction: Meta-analysis.

The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the postoperative outcomes and complications of labral repair with those of labral reconstruction. An electronic search strategy was conducted from 1986 until August 2023 using the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20). The primary objectives included the postoperative clinical outcomes determined by the number of patients who reached minimal clinical important difference (MCID) on the visual analog scale (VAS), modified Harris hip score (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score-Sports Subscale (HOS-SS), Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Life (HOS-ADL), and International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12). In addition, analysis of the rate of revision arthroscopy, the rate of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA), the postoperative VAS, mHHS, HOS-SS, HOS-ADL, iHOT-12, nonarthritic hip score (NAHS), patient satisfaction, lower extremity function scale (LEFS), and the SF-12 (12-item shortform) was also performed. Any differences arising between the investigators were resolved by discussion. Seventeen studies were relevant to the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. A higher rate of patients who reached MCID in the mHHS (P=0.02) as well as a higher rate of revision arthroscopy was observed for labral repair (P=0.03). The remaining studied outcomes were comparable. Despite the greater predictability of success in the reconstruction group, conduct of additional studies will be required for evaluation of the benefits of such findings. In addition, labral reconstruction is more technically demanding than a labral repair.

Lumbar Spine and Neural Tissue Mobilizations Improve Outcomes in Runners Presenting With Foot/Ankle Pathology: A Case Series.

Foot/ankle pain is common among runners. Inadequate management of runners with foot/ankle pain can lead to lost training time, competition removal, and other activity limitations. Neurodynamics, which refers to the integrated biomechanical, physiological, and structural function of the nervous system during movement, can be overlooked in patients with foot/ankle pain. Although a link between the cervical spine, neurodynamics, and upper quarter pain has been studied, less is known about the relationship between the lumbar spine and lower quarter. This case series describes the successful management of 3 runners with foot/ankle pain. Three female runners (ages 23, 24, and 45y) presented to physical therapy with foot/ankle pain and difficulty running. Each patient had positive examination findings with local foot/ankle testing. A comprehensive lumbar spine examination demonstrated impairments in range of motion and joint mobility that were hypothesized to be contributing. Positive lower quarter neurodynamic tests were also found. All patients were treated with nonthrust lumbar spine mobilization and lower quarter neural tissue mobilization. Changes in the Patient-Specific Functional Scale, Numerical Pain Rating Scale, Lower Extremity Functional Scale, and Global Rating of Change occurred after intervention targeting the lumbar spine and lower-extremity neurodynamics in all patients. This case series demonstrates the importance of including a thorough lumbar spine examination and neurodynamic testing to identify appropriate interventions while managing patients with foot/ankle pain, even when patients have signs indicative of local ankle/foot pathology. These examination procedures should be performed particularly when a patient is not responding to management targeting local foot/ankle structures.

Patellofemoral Pain: Correlations Between Hip Strength, Pain Severity, and Function

Introduction: Patellofemoral pain is a common condition that results in anterior knee pain and frequently affects a wide range of the population, from adolescents to older adults. The etiology of patellofemoral pain is multifactorial and usually results in peripatellar or retropatellar pain. The purpose of this study is to determine whether a correlation exists between the strength of the posterolateral hip musculature and the severity of pain or level of function experienced by individuals with patellofemoral pain. Methods: The participants rated pain and functional levels with the Numeric Pain Rating Scale and the Lower Extremity Functional Scale, respectively. The strength of the participants’ posterolateral hip musculature was assessed with a handheld dynamometer. This study used a quantitative, cross-sectional, correlational design to determine the nature of the correlations between these variables. Results: A total of 30 participants met the inclusion criteria and participated in the study. Posterolateral hip strength and pain severity ratings were found to be significantly negatively correlated at the .05 level, r (28) = -.375, p=.041. Posterolateral hip strength and the participants' level of function were significantly positively correlated at the .01 level, r (28) = .541, p = .002. Pain severity ratings and the participants' level of function were also significantly negatively correlated at the .001 level, r (28) = - .526, p = .003. Discussion: Due to the multifactorial nature of PFP, the most evidence-based treatment approach is a thorough assessment followed by the development and implementation of an individualized, comprehensive treatment plan. Based on the findings of the study, however, weakness of the posterolateral hip musculature may indeed be present in a significant percentage of individuals with PFP. The authors declare no competing interests.