Low-volume Surgeons Research Articles

The Relationship Between Hospital Safety-Net Burden on Outcomes for High-Volume Thyroid Cancer Surgeons.

Background: Higher center and surgeon volume correspond to better outcomes for patients with thyroid cancer. This study aims to investigate how a hospital's safety-net burden, the proportion of a hospital's patients who are insured by state Medicaid plans or are uninsured, influences the outcomes of high-volume (HV) surgeons. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent surgery for thyroid cancer in California from 1999 to 2017. We stratified treating facilities by the proportion of Medicaid-type and indigent payors into safety-net burden quartiles. We compared the perioperative and oncologic outcomes of HV surgeons (annual case volume ≥10) for patients undergoing total thyroidectomy across safety-net burden quartiles. A mixed-effects regression model controlled for surgeon random effects and fixed effects of patient and tumor characteristics. Results: Our sample comprised 42,347 patients (78% female, median age 50), of whom 13,848 (32%) were treated by HV surgeons (n = 276). Compared to patients of lower-volume surgeons, patients of HV surgeons were more likely to be White, from the upper quartiles of socioeconomic status and well insured (all p < 0.001). HV surgeons in each hospital's safety-net burden quartile displayed similar case number distributions. Compared to patients treated by HV surgeons at Q1 (lowest safety-net burden) hospitals, those treated by HV surgeons at Q4 (highest safety-net burden) hospitals had higher absolute risks of endocrine complications (+7%, p = 0.007), airway complications (+6%, p = 0.004), disease-specific mortality (+1.3%, p = 0.046), and all-cause mortality during the study period (+3%, p = 0.046) in multivariable analysis. Conclusion: The performance of HV thyroid cancer surgeons differs by a hospital's safety-net burden, with patients treated at high safety-net burden hospitals experiencing higher rates of operative complications, disease-specific mortality, and all-cause mortality. Having a HV surgeon alone may be insufficient to provide optimal short- and long-term outcomes for patients with thyroid cancer.

Low-Volume Surgeons Operating at High-Volume Hospitals Have Low Rates of Periprosthetic Joint Infection after Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

IntroductionThe relationship between surgeon and hospital case volumes and postoperative risk following total hip and total knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA) has been described independently. This study aimed to assess the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following primary TKA and THA to determine if lower volume surgeons operating at higher volume centers would have lower rates of complications compared to lower volume surgeons operating at lower volume hospitals. MethodsA healthcare database was used to retrospectively identify all primary, and elective total joint arthroplasties (TJAs) from October 2015 to December 2021. Using restricted cubic splines, high-volume hospitals were defined using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation, which identified a volume beyond which PJI rates no longer decreased significantly with increasing hospital volume. A similar methodology was used to identify low-volume surgeons operating in high- and low-volume hospitals. There were 605,254 patients who underwent TJA (total hip arthroplasty [THA]: 37.71%; total knee arthroplasty [TKA]: 62.29%) by low-volume surgeons (< 57 THAs and < 68 TKAs) identified and divided into high-volume and low-volume hospital cohorts. High-volume hospitals were defined as > 508 THA and > 812 TKAs per year, and low-volume hospitals were defined as < 145 THAs and < 243 TKAs per year. Multivariable models accounting for potential confounding covariates were created to determine the odds of PJI between cohorts. ResultsAfter taking confounding variables into account, low-volume surgeons at high-volume hospitals had lower rates of PJI relative to their counterparts at low-volume hospitals (THA 0.67 versus 0.80%, aOR [adjusted odds ratio] = 0.69 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.54 to 0.88], P = 0.002; TKA 0.51 versus 0.69%, aOR = 0.73, [95%-CI = 0.61 to 0.87], P = 0.007). ConclusionIncreasing institutional case volume may mitigate the increased risk of PJI associated with low annual surgeon case volume.

The Relationship Between Surgeon Volume and Major Surgical Complications After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: An Evaluation of 3177 US Orthopedic Surgeons.

Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), which includes anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), is a technically demanding procedure and limited data exist on the relationship between case volume and complications. We sought to identify volume thresholds for TSA, aTSA, and rTSA at which risk of a major surgical complication decreased and to compare complications of patients treated by high-volume surgeons with those of patients treated by low-volume surgeons. Primary, elective TSAs (aTSA and rTSA) from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019, were identified in the Premier Healthcare Database. Multivariable logistic regression with restricted cubic splines modeled the relationship between annual TSA, aTSA, and rTSA surgeon volume and 90-day risk of major surgical complications. The 90-day complications of patients treated by high- and low-volume surgeons were compared. From 2016 to 2019, 3177 surgeons performed 78,639 TSAs. Increasing annual volume was associated with decreasing major surgical complication risk (thresholds: 50 TSAs, 25 aTSAs, and 36 rTSAs). High- and low-volume surgeons performed 24,595 and 54,044 TSAs, respectively. Patients of high-volume surgeons had lower risk of major surgical complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56-0.84), myocardial infarction (aOR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.97), and readmission (aOR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.62-0.81). Importantly, 74.9% of high-volume and 93.0% of low-volume surgeon-year units had major surgical complication rates below the mean of all recorded surgeons. While most high- and low-volume surgeons had major surgical complication rates below the cohort average, increasing TSA volume was associated with a decreased risk of complications. [Orthopedics. 202x;4x(x):xx-xx.].

PREDICTORS OF ROTATIONAL FAILURE IN PAEDIATRIC SUPRACONDYLAR HUMERAL FRACTURES

Lateral-entry wiring (LEW) for displaced supracondylar humeral fractures (SHFs) has been popularised internationally. BOAST guidance suggests either LEW or crossed wires; the latter has reported lower risk of loss of fracture reduction –we explore technical reasons why.We reviewed 8 years of displaced SHFs in two regional centres. Injuries were grouped using the Gartland Classification, with posterolateral or posteromedial displacement assessment for Gartland 3 injuries. We identified any loss of fracture reduction, and reviewed intra-operative imaging to identify learning points that may contribute to early rotational displacement (ERD).345 SHFs were included, between 2012 and 2020. Gartland 2 (n=117) injuries had a 3.42% risk. ERD. Gartland 3 crossed wirings (n=114) had a 6.14% risk of ERD, with those moving all being posterolaterally displaced. Gartland 3, posterolaterally displaced LEW (n=56) had a 35.7% risk of ERD. Gartland 3, posteromedially displaced LEW (n=58) had a 22.4% risk of ERD. All injuries with ERD except 3 had identifiable learning points, the commonest being non-divergence of wires, or wires not passing through both fracture fragments.LEW requires divergent spread and bicolumnar fixation. Achieving a solid construct through this method appears more challenging than crossed wiring, with rates of ERD 3–5× higher. Low-volume surgeons should adhere to BOAST guidelines and choose a wiring construct that works best in their hands. They can also be reassured that should a loss of position occur, the risk of requirement for revision surgery is extremely low in our study (0.3%), and it is unlikely to affect long term outcomes.

Association Among Surgeon Volume, Surgical Approach, and Uterine Size for Hysterectomy for Benign Indications.

To assess the relationship between surgeon volume and surgical approach for patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications among uteri of varying sizes. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign indications from 2012 to 2021 within the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative registry. For each hysterectomy, the relative annual volume of the performing surgeon was assessed by calculating the proportion of hysterectomy cases contributed by the surgeon each calendar year relative to the total number of hysterectomies in the registry for that year. Hysterectomies were stratified into tertiles: those performed by low-volume surgeons, intermediate-volume surgeons, and high-volume surgeons. Uterine size was represented by the uterine specimen weight and categorized to facilitate clinical interpretation. Multivariable logistic regression models were developed incorporating interaction terms for surgeon volume and uterine size to explore potential effect modification. A total of 54,150 hysterectomies were included. Hysterectomies performed by intermediate- and high-volume surgeons were more likely to be performed through a minimally invasive approach compared with those performed by low-volume surgeons (intermediate-volume: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.68, 95% CI, 1.47-1.92; high-volume: aOR 2.14, 95% CI, 1.87-2.46). Moreover, this likelihood increased with increasing uterine weight. For uteri weighing between 1,000 g and 1,999 g, the odds of minimally invasive approach was significantly higher among intermediate-volume surgeons (aOR 3.38, 95% CI, 2.04-5.12) and high-volume (aOR 9.26, 95% CI, 5.64-15.2) surgeons, compared with low-volume surgeons. After including an interaction term for uterine weight and surgeon volume, we identified effect modification of surgeon volume on the relationship between uterine size and choice of minimally invasive surgery. For uteri up to 3,000 g in weight, hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons have a higher likelihood of being performed through a minimally invasive approach compared with those performed by low-volume surgeons.

Association of Technology Usage and Decreased Revision TKA Rates for Low-Volume Surgeons Using an Optimal Prosthesis Combination: An Analysis of 53,264 Primary TKAs.

Technology (navigation and robotics) usage during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is often supported by literature involving high-volume surgeons and hospitals, but the value of technology for lower-volume surgeons is uncertain. This study aimed to determine if there was a relationship among surgeon volume, technology usage, and revision rate when using an optimal prosthesis combination (OPC). Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) data were obtained from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2022, for all primary TKA procedures performed for osteoarthritis using an OPC by a known surgeon ≥5 years after their first recorded procedure. The interaction between surgeon volume and conventional-instrumentation (CV) versus technology-assisted (TA) TKA was assessed. The cumulative percent revision (CPR) was determined by Kaplan-Meier estimates. Cox proportional-hazards methods were used to compare rates of revision by surgeon volume and by the interaction of volume and technology. Subanalyses were undertaken to examine major and minor revisions separately, and to assess the influence of technology on revision rates relative to those of a surgeon undertaking 100 TKA/year. Of the 53,264 procedures that met the inclusion criteria, 31,536 were TA-TKA and 21,728 were CV-TKA. Use of technology reduced the all-cause revision rate for surgeons with a volume of <50 TKA/year and the rate of minor revisions for surgeons with a volume of <40 TKA/year. No interaction between surgeon volume and the rate of major revision surgery was found. With CV-TKA by a surgeon with a 100-TKA/year volume as the comparator, all-cause and major revision rates were significantly elevated for surgeons undertaking <50 and <100 TKA/year, respectively. In contrast, analysis of TA-TKA showed no difference in rates of all-cause or major revisions for surgeons undertaking <100 TKA/year compared with 100 TKA/year. TA-TKA was associated with a decrease in the revision rate for lower-volume surgeons but no significant alterations in revision rate for higher-volume surgeons. Preferential use of TA-TKA by lower-volume surgeons should be considered. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The Impact of Surgeon Volume on Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Survivorship: A Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative Database Analysis

BackgroundThe utilization of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has remained low when compared to total knee arthroplasty (TKA), possibly due to higher rates of revision and reoperation. This study aimed to quantify surgeon UKA case-volumes and measure the effect of surgeon volume on early revision. We hypothesized that surgeons who have high case volumes would have lower revision rates compared to medium- and low-volume surgeons. MethodsPrimary UKAs were performed between February 2012 and November 2021, and associated revisions were identified utilizing the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative. Surgeon information, including total cases and annual UKA volume, was collected. Case volume per year was stratified as High (≥ 35 cases per year), Medium (15 to 34 cases per year), and low (< 15 cases per year). ResultsThere were a total of 15,542 UKAs performed. Of these, 701 (4.5%) were revised, and 412 (58.8%) revisions occurred within 2 years. Of the 287 surgeons who performed an UKA in the registry, 237 (82.6%) were low-volume surgeons, 36 (12.5%) were medium-volume, and 14 (4.9%) were high-volume. High-volume surgeons were more likely to operate on older patients (P < 0.01), Medicare patients (P < 0.01), and patients who had American Society of Anesthesiologists scores of III and IV (P < 0.01). High-volume surgeons had significantly lower 5-year revision rates compared to medium and low-volume surgeons (high: 4.3% (95% confidence interval: 3.7 to 4.9), medium: 5.2% (4.4 to 6.1), low: 7.2% (6.4 to 8.0); P < 0.001). In comparison, the 5-year revision rate for TKA in Michigan was 3.0% (95% confidence interval: 2.9 to 3.1). ConclusionsWhen UKAs were performed by high-volume surgeons in the state of Michigan, there was better survivorship when compared to low-and medium-volume surgeons. High-volume surgeons were more likely to perform UKA on older patients, Medicare patients, and patients who had American Society of Anesthesiologists scores of III and IV. The revision rate for the high-volume surgeons still exceeded the 5-year revision rate for TKA in Michigan.

Do Social Deprivation and Surgical Volume Influence Outcomes Following Distal Radius Fracture Fixation?

Distal radius fractures account for nearly 25% of fractures in adults, with a trend toward operative fixation. The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between surgeon and hospital volume with complications following distal radius fixation. A retrospective study was performed using the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database from 2009 to 2015. Outpatient claims were identified for distal radius fractures and surgery. The facility and surgeon's identifier were used to calculate annual procedure volume. The risk for infection, carpal tunnel surgery, and revision/hardware removal was analyzed, and Social Deprivation Index (SDI) was linked to each patient. Patient demographics and rate of complications were compared across hospital and physician volume. A total of 14 748 patients were included, finding Federal and self-pay insurance associated with low-volume (LV) facility care and private insurance with high-volume (HV) facilities. The SDI for patients treated by LV surgeons and hospitals was significantly higher compared with HV providers. Low-volume facilities and surgeons had a higher 3-month risk of infection requiring reoperation. High-volume facilities were less likely to treat Hispanic patients, those with comorbidities, higher SDI, and with Federal or self-pay insurance. Patients treated by LV surgeons and facilities had a higher risk of infection requiring surgery within 3 months than those treated by HV providers. Low-volume facilities were more likely to treat patients who were Hispanic, Federally insured, and with comorbidities and higher SDI than HV facilities, increasing their risk for disadvantaged care. Level III.

Who should perform pediatric laparoscopic cholecystectomies? A systematic review of the literature.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is an increasingly common operation in the pediatric population, although numbers remain significantly lower than in adults. Currently, this operation is performed by both adult and pediatric surgeons and there is no consensus as to whether specialist low-volume or adult high-volume surgeons should be performing this operation. A literature search was performed to compare the outcomes following pediatric LC when performed by adult or pediatric surgeons. 19,993 patients were included in this analysis. Overall, post-operative complications were reduced when LC was performed by high-volume adult surgeons, along with reduced length of stay and associated cost. Overall morbidity following LC in children is comparable to adults. When performed by higher volume adult surgeons, there was a statically significant reduction in post-operative complications and re-admission rates. Morbidity was also reduced in patients with simple cholelithiasis. Initial results show that in pediatric patients presenting with cholelithiasis, LC performed by a high-volume adult general surgeon is safer. In more complex children with needs from other specialist pediatricians, surgery performed by a pediatric surgeon is recommended. Further research with direct comparisons is still required.

The Association Between Surgeon Volume and Dislocation After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Nationwide Evaluation of 5,106 Orthopaedic Surgeons.

The relationship between surgeon volume and risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is debated. This study sought to characterize this association and assess patient outcomes using a nationwide patient and surgeon registry. The Premier Healthcare Database was queried for adult primary elective THA patients from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019. Annual surgeon volume and 90-day risk of dislocation were modeled using multivariable logistic regression with restricted cubic splines. Bootstrap analysis identified a threshold annual case volume, corresponding to the maximum decrease in dislocation risk. Surgeons with an annual volume greater than the threshold were deemed high volume, and those with an annual volume less than the threshold were low volume. Each surgeon within a given year was treated as a unique entity (surgeon-year unit). 90-day complications of patients treated by high-volume and low-volume surgeons were compared. From 2016 to 2019, 352,131 THAs were performed by 5,106 surgeons. The restricted cubic spline model demonstrated an inverse relationship between risk of dislocation and surgeon volume (threshold: 109 cases per year). A total of 9,967 (87.8%) low-volume surgeon-year units had individual dislocation rates lower than the average of the entire surgeon cohort. Patients treated by high-volume surgeons had decreased risk of dislocation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.67), periprosthetic fracture (aOR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.99), periprosthetic joint infection (aOR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.69), readmission (aOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.73), and in-hospital death (aOR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.80). While most of the low-volume surgeons had dislocation rates lower than the cohort average, increasing annual surgeon case volume was associated with a reduction in risk of dislocation after primary elective THA. Level IV.

Iatrogenic Sciatic Nerve Injury in Posterior Acetabular Surgery: Surgeon More Predictive Than Position.

To identify factors that contribute to iatrogenic sciatic nerve palsy during acetabular surgery through a Kocher-Langenbeck approach and to evaluate if variation among individual surgeons exists. Retrospective cohort. Level I trauma center. Adults undergoing fixation of acetabular fractures (AO/OTA 62) through a posterior approach by 9 orthopaedic traumatologists between November 2010 and November 2022. The prevalence of iatrogenic sciatic nerve palsy and comparison of the prevalence and risk of palsy between prone and lateral positions before and after adjusting for individual surgeon and the presence of transverse fracture patterns in logistic regression. Comparison of the prevalence of palsy between high-volume (>1 patient/month) and low-volume surgeons. A total of 644 acetabular fractures repaired through a posterior approach were included (median age 39 years, 72% male). Twenty of 644 surgeries (3.1%) resulted in iatrogenic sciatic nerve palsy with no significant difference between the prone (3.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9%-4.9%) and lateral (3.3%, 95% CI, 1.3%-8.1%) positions (P = 0.64). Logistic regression adjusting for surgeon and transverse fracture pattern demonstrated no significant effect for positions (odds ratio 1.0, 95% CI, 0.3-3.9). Transverse fracture pattern was associated with increased palsy risk (odds ratio 3.0, 95% CI, 1.1-7.9). Individual surgeon was significantly associated with iatrogenic palsy (P < 0.02). Surgeon and the presence of a transverse fracture line predicted iatrogenic nerve palsy after a posterior approach to the acetabulum in this single-center cohort. Surgeons should perform the Kocher-Langenbeck approach for acetabular fixation in the position they deem most appropriate, as the position was not associated with the rate of iatrogenic palsy in this series. Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The Impact of American Board of Urology Certification on Postoperative Outcomes for Patients in New York State.

Our goal was to determine if board certification status was associated with improved postoperative outcomes for certain urologic oncology operations. We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients aged 65 and over having radical prostatectomy (RP), radical cystectomy (RC), and radical or partial nephrectomy (RPN) by surgeons with New York State licenses from 2015 to 2021 using the Medicare limited dataset. Our primary exposure was surgeon American Board of Urology certification determined by the New York State Physician Profile. All surgeons were in practice for at least 5 years. Our primary outcomes were 90-day mortality, 30-day unplanned readmission, and hospital length of stay (LOS). We used multivariable linear and logistic regression adjusted for surgeon, hospital, and patient characteristics. We performed the analysis in R, and 2-sided P values < .05 were considered statistically significant. We identified 12,601 patients who had a procedure performed. At the time of the procedure, a minority of procedures (1.3%) were performed by nonboard-certified (NBC) urologists. Among the patient cohort, there were 262 and 1419 mortality and readmission events, respectively; median LOS was 2 days (interquartile range 1155). Patients operated on by NBC urologists tended to have lower-volume surgeons who were less likely to be fellowship trained and to have surgery at smaller hospitals. Patients treated by NBC urologists were more likely to have RP, and less likely to have RC and RPN. On multivariate analysis, board certification was protective against readmission for RP (P < .001) and RC (P = .02), longer LOS for RC (P = .001), and mortality for RPN (P = .008). Urology board certification was associated with fewer readmissions after RP and RC, a shorter LOS after RC, and a lower risk of mortality after RPN. Given low event numbers, these findings require validation with a larger dataset.

Autofluorescence-Guided Total Thyroidectomy in Low-Volume, Nonparathyroid Institutions.

Hypoparathyroidism following thyroid surgery is a serious complication that occurs frequently when surgery is performed by low-volume thyroid surgeons without experience in parathyroid surgery. To evaluate the occurrence of hypoparathyroidism following total thyroidectomy after the introduction of autofluorescence in low-volume, nonparathyroid institutions. This prospective, multicenter cohort study, with a follow-up period of up to 1 year, was conducted in Denmark at 2 low-volume nonparathyroid institutions between January 2021 and November 2023. All adult patients referred for total thyroidectomy were assessed for eligibility (n = 90). Only patients with no history of thyroid surgery were considered (n = 89). Patients who only underwent lobectomy (n = 6) or declined to participate (n = 5) were excluded. All included patients completed follow-up. The prospective cohort was compared with a historical cohort of successive patients undergoing primary total thyroidectomy from 2016 to 2020 (before autofluorescence was available). Included patients underwent autofluorescence-guided total thyroidectomy. Rate of hypoparathyroidism. Immediate hypoparathyroidism was defined as the need for active vitamin D postoperatively, whereas permanent hypoparathyroidism was considered when there still was a need for active vitamin D 1 year after surgery. Seventy-eight patients underwent autofluorescence-guided surgery (mean [SD] age, 55.6 [13.1] years; 67 [86%] female) and were compared with 89 patients in the historical cohort (mean [SD] age, 49.7 [12.8] years; 78 [88%] female). The rate of immediate hypoparathyroidism decreased from 37% (95% CI, 27%-48%) to 19% (95% CI, 11%-30%) after the introduction of autofluorescence (P = .02). Permanent hypoparathyroidism rates decreased from 32% (95% CI, 22%-42%) to 6% (95% CI, 2%-14%) (P < .001), reaching 0% at the end of the study. More parathyroid glands were identified with autofluorescence (75% [95% CI, 70%-80%] vs 61% [95% CI, 56%-66%]) (P < .001) and less parathyroid glands were inadvertently excised (4% [95% CI, 1%-11%] vs 21% [95% CI, 13%-31%]) (P = .001). In this cohort study of autofluorescence-guided thyroid surgery in low-volume, nonparathyroid institutions, the use of autofluorescence was associated with a significant decrease in both immediate and permanent hypoparathyroidism. When autofluorescence was used, hypoparathyroidism rates were comparable with those of high-volume surgeons who also perform parathyroid surgery.

RISK FACTORS FOR MENISCAL REPAIR FAILURE FOLLOWING CONCURRENT PRIMARY ACL RECONSTRUCTION: RESULTS FROM THE NEW ZEALAND ACL REGISTRY

BackgroundAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with concomitant meniscal injury occurs frequently. Meniscal repair is associated with improved long-term outcomes compared to resection but is also associated with a higher reoperation rate. Knowledge of the risk factors for repair failure may be important in optimizing patient outcomes.PurposeThis study aimed to identify the patient and surgical risk factors for meniscal repair failure, defined as a subsequent meniscectomy, following concurrent primary ACL reconstruction.MethodsData recorded by the New Zealand ACL Registry and the Accident Compensation Corporation, the New Zealand Government's sole funder of ACL reconstructions and any subsequent surgery, was reviewed. Meniscal repairs performed with concurrent primary ACL reconstruction was included. Root repairs were excluded. Univariate and multivariate survival analysis was performed to identify the patient and surgical risk factors for meniscal repair failure.ResultsBetween 2014 and 2020, a total of 3,024 meniscal repairs were performed during concurrent primary ACL reconstruction (medial repair = 1,814 and lateral repair = 1,210). The overall failure rate was 6.6% (n = 201) at a mean follow-up of 2.9 years, with a failure occurring in 7.8% of medial meniscal repairs (142 out of 1,814) and 4.9% of lateral meniscal repairs (59 out of 1,210). The risk of medial failure was higher in patients with a hamstring tendon autograft (adjusted HR = 2.20, p = 0.001), patients aged 21–30 years (adjusted HR = 1.60, p = 0.037) and in those with cartilage injury in the medial compartment (adjusted HR = 1.75, p = 0.002). The risk of lateral failure was higher in patients aged ≤ 20 years (adjusted HR = 2.79, p = 0.021) and when the procedure was performed by a surgeon with an annual ACL reconstruction case volume of less than 30 (adjusted HR = 1.84, p = 0.026).ConclusionWhen performing meniscal repair during a primary ACL reconstruction, the use of a hamstring tendon autograft, younger age and the presence of concomitant cartilage injury in the medial compartment increases the risk of medial meniscal repair failure, whereas younger age and low surgeon volume increases the risk of lateral meniscal repair failure.

Impact of surgeon volume, experience, and training on outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a nationwide analysis of 1489 surgeons

BackgroundGiven the complexity of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) and increasing prevalence, there is a need for comprehensive, large-scale studies that investigate potential correlations between surgeon-specific factors and postoperative outcomes after ARCR. This study examines how surgeon-specific factors including case volume, career length, fellowship training, practice setting, and regional practice impact two-year reoperation rates, conversion to total shoulder arthroplasty (anatomic or reverse) (TSA), and 90-day post-ARCR hospitalization. MethodsThe PearlDiver Mariner Database was used to collect surgeon-specific variables and query patients who underwent ARCR from 2015 to 2018. Patient outcomes were tracked for two years, including reoperations, hospitalizations, and ICD-10 codes for revision rotator cuff repair (RCR) laterality. Hospitalizations were defined as any emergency department (ED) visit or hospital readmission within 90 days after primary ARCR. Surgeon-specific factors including surgeon case volume, career length, fellowship training, practice setting, and regional practice were analyzed in relation to postoperative outcomes using both univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Results94,150 patients underwent ARCR by 1,489 surgeons. On multivariate analysis, high volume surgeons demonstrated a higher risk for two-year total reoperation (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01-1.12, P = 0.03) and revision RCR (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01-1.12, P = 0.02) compared to low volume surgeons. Early-career surgeons showed higher rates of 90-day ED visits (mid-career surgeons: OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.73-0.83, P < 0.001; late-career surgeons: OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.68-0.78, P < 0.001) and hospital readmission (mid-career surgeons: OR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.63-0.87, P < 0.001; late-career surgeons: OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.61-0.88, P = 0.006) compared to mid- and late-career surgeons. Sports Medicine and/or Shoulder and Elbow fellowship-trained surgeons demonstrated lower two-year reoperation risk (OR = 0.95, CI: 0.91-0.99, P = 0.04) and fewer 90-day ED visits (OR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.88-0.98, P = 0.002). Academic surgeons experienced higher readmission rates compared to community surgeons (OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.01-1.34, P = 0.03). Surgeons practicing in the Northeast demonstrated lower two-year reoperation (OR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.83-0.93, P < 0.001) and revision (OR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.83-0.94, P < 0.001) rotator cuff repair risk, compared to surgeons in the Southern United States. ConclusionsHigh-volume surgeons exhibit higher two-year reoperation rates after ARCR compared to low-volume surgeons. Early-career surgeons demonstrate increased hospitalizations. Sports Medicine or Shoulder and Elbow Surgery fellowships correlate with reduced two-year reoperation rates and 90-day ED visits.

The learning curve for robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty in low, medium, and high-volume surgeons

BackgroundRobotic systems have been designed to increase the accuracy of implant alignment in total knee and hip arthroplasty. This technology is associated with a learning curve for the operative time to reach peak efficiency in its use. Prior studies done on high-volume orthopedic surgeons have suggested a learning curve of 14–35 cases for robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA). It is unclear if this learning curve is different for surgeons with lower volumes. MethodsData was collected retrospectively from 299 THA procedures done by three different surgeons, with low (1–15 cases/year), medium (16–50), and high (51+) volume caseload. The learning curve was assessed primarily by average operative time from cases 1–20, 21–50, and 51+. ResultsThe high-volume surgeon had a learning curve of 20 cases, while the low and medium volume surgeons had no significant decrease in their operative time through the cases included in the study (20 and 63, respectively). ConclusionsHigh volume surgeons have a learning curve of about 20 cases, while low and medium volume surgeons have a longer curve, which was not able to be measured in this study.

Operative Volumes and Postoperative Outcomes After Elective Resection of Congenital Lung Malformations in Infants.

To determine whether hospital- and surgeon-level operative volumes are associated with differences in postoperative outcomes among infants undergoing elective lung surgery for a congenital lung malformation (CLM). Infant lung surgery is a relatively uncommon procedure performed by pediatric surgeons nationwide. The relationship between surgical volume and postoperative outcomes remains unknown. A retrospective cohort study of asymptomatic infants who underwent elective lung resection of a CLM was conducted using the Pediatric Health Information System database (2016-2020). Multivariable linear and poisson regressions were performed based on annual lung resection tertiles. There were 1420 infants managed by 48 hospitals and 309 primary surgeons. Institutions that performed seven or fewer CLM resections per year (56%) were associated with significantly higher postoperative complication rates compared to medium- and high-volume hospitals (low: 134 [34%], medium: 110 [21%], high: 144 [29%]; P<0.001). Surgeons who performed one or fewer CLM resections per year (82%) were associated with significantly higher complication rates compared to medium- and high-volume surgeons (low: 171 [31%], medium: 75 [26%], high: 119 [24%]; P=0.02). Multivariable analyses confirmed that low-volume hospitals were associated with higher complications (OR 1.81, CI 1.38-2.37; P<0.001), and low-volume surgeons had an increased risk of complications (overall: OR 1.37, CI 1.01-1.84; P=0.04). In this cohort study of infants undergoing elective lung resection for a CLM, lower volume providers were associated with higher postoperative patient morbidity. These findings represent an opportunity to inform quality improvement initiatives on pediatric lung resection and the debate on surgical subspecialization for this unique patient population.

Influence of Surgeon Experience and Clinic Volume on Subjective Knee Function and Revision Rates in Primary ACL Reconstruction: A Study from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) performed by high-volume surgeons/clinics has been associated with increased graft individualization and decreased operating times, complication rates, and total costs. To investigate the influence of surgeon/clinic volume on subjective knee function and revision surgery rates at 2 years after primary ACLR. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Data from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry were used to study patients who underwent primary ACLR between 2008 and 2019. Surgeons/clinics were categorized based on a combination of total caseload volume (cutoff: 50 ACLRs/surgeon, 500 ACLRs/clinic) and annual volume (cutoff: 29 ACLRs/year/surgeon, 56 ACLRs/year/clinic). The thresholds of minimal important change (MIC), Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS), and treatment failure (TF) relative to the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and KOOS4 (mean score of the KOOS Pain, Symptoms, Sports/Rec, and QoL subscales) were applied. Adjusted multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess variables influencing the MIC, PASS, or TF of the KOOS and KOOS4. Adjusted Cox regression analysis was conducted to determine the hazard ratio of subsequent ACLR. Of 35,371 patients, 16,317 had 2-year follow-up outcome data and were included. Patients who underwent primary ACLR by high-volume surgeons had significantly higher MIC and PASS rates and lower TF rates when compared with patients who underwent the procedure by low-volume surgeons: MICKOOS4: 70.6% vs 66.3%; PASSKOOS4: 46.0% versus 38.3%; and TFKOOS4: 8.7% versus 11.8% (all P < .02). Significantly decreased odds of achieving MICKOOS4 (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62-0.88) and PASSKOOS4 (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.60-0.84) were found for ACLRs performed by low-volume surgeons. Clinic volume did not influence the odds of reaching MIC, PASS, or TF. Overall, 804 patients (2.3%) underwent subsequent ACLR at <2 years, with significantly higher revision rates among patients operated on at high-volume clinics (2.5% vs 1.7%; P < .001). However, in the adjusted Cox regression, surgeon/clinic volume had no influence on subsequent ACLR rates. High-volume surgeons/clinics had decreased time to surgery, operating time, perioperative complication rates, and use of thromboprophylaxis and nonroutine antibiotics (P < .001). Patients who underwent primary ACLR by high-volume surgeons experienced increased improvement and satisfaction regarding subjective knee function. Factors other than surgical volume influenced subsequent surgery rates. Patients might benefit from undergoing primary ACLR by high-volume providers.

Surgeon volume and outcomes following thoracic endovascular aortic repair for blunt thoracic aortic injury

ObjectiveThoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) at high-volume hospitals has previously been associated with lower perioperative mortality, but the impact of annual surgeon volume on outcomes following TEVAR for BTAI remains unknown. MethodsWe analyzed Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) data from patients with BTAI that underwent TEVAR between 2013 and 2023. Annual surgeon volumes were computed as the number of TEVARs (for any pathology) performed over a 1-year period preceding each procedure and were further categorized into quintiles. Surgeons in the first volume quintile were categorized as low volume (LV), the highest quintile as high volume (HV), and the middle three quintiles as medium volume (MV). TEVAR procedures performed by surgeons with less than 1-year enrollment in the VQI were excluded. Using multilevel logistic regression models, we evaluated associations between surgeon volume and perioperative outcomes, accounting for annual center volumes and adjusting for potential confounders, including aortic injury grade and severity of coexisting injuries. Multilevel models accounted for the nested clustering of patients and surgeons within the same center. Sensitivity analysis excluding patients with grade IV BTAI was performed. ResultsWe studied 1321 patients who underwent TEVAR for BTAI (28% by LV surgeons [0-1 procedures per year], 52% by MV surgeons [2-8 procedures per year], 20% by HV surgeons [≥9 procedures per year]). With higher surgeon volume, TEVAR was delayed more (in <4 hours: LV: 68%, MV: 54%, HV: 46%; P < .001; elective (>24 hours): LV: 5.1%; MV: 8.9%: HV: 14%), heparin administered more (LV: 80%, MV: 81%, HV: 87%; P = .007), perioperative mortality appears lower (LV: 11%, MV: 7.3%, HV: 6.5%; P = .095), and ischemic/hemorrhagic stroke was lower (LV: 6.5%, MV: 3.6%, HV: 1.5%; P = .006). After adjustment, compared with LV surgeons, higher volume surgeons had lower odds of perioperative mortality (MV: 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-0.97; P = .039; HV: 0.45; 95% CI, 0.16–1.22; P = .12; MV/HV: 0.50; 95% CI, 0.26-0.96; P = .038) and ischemic/hemorrhagic stroke (MV: 0.38; 95% CI, 0.18-0.81; P = .011; HV: 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04-0.61; P = .008). Sensitivity analysis found lower adjusted odds for perioperative mortality (although not significant) and ischemic/hemorrhagic stroke for higher volume surgeons. ConclusionsIn patients undergoing TEVAR for BTAI, higher surgeon volume is independently associated with lower perioperative mortality and postoperative stroke, regardless of hospital volume. Future studies could elucidate if TEVAR for non-ruptured BTAI might be delayed and allow stabilization, heparinization, and involvement of a higher TEVAR volume surgeon.

Analysis of Changing Practice Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Multicenter, Single-Institution Database Analysis

PurposeThis study sought to identify trends in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR), including graft choice, femoral tunnel drilling, and augmentation techniques, and to assess how various surgeon factors impact these trends. MethodsA retrospective review of primary ACLR performed between 2014 and 2022 was performed using a multi-centered institutional database. Patient demographics, graft type, femoral drilling technique, use of extra-articular tenodesis, and use of suture augmentation were recorded from the medical record. Surgeon fellowship training (sports-trained versus non-sports-trained), experience (high: minimum 15 years in practice), and volume (high: minimum 15 ACLR per year) were used to stratify technique utilization. Z-test for proportions compared categorical variables. Pearson correlation analyses identified trends and assessed statistical significance, defined as a p-value less than 0.05. ResultsOur cohort consisted of 2,032 ACLR performed on 2,006 patients. The average patient age was 28.3 +/- 11.6 years, with more procedures performed on males (67.3%). The average surgeon experience was 19.7 +/- 11.4 years, with an average annual procedural volume of 4.0 +/- 5.4. Most surgeons were sports-trained (55, 64.7%), high experience (44, 57.1%), and low-volume (80, 94.1%). There were increasing annual proportion of ACLR performed by sports-trained (R=0.748, p=0.020) and low experience (R=0.940, p<0.001) surgeons. Autograft reconstructions were most often performed by sports-trained (71.2%), low experience (66.1%), and high-volume (76.9%) surgeons. There was an increasing proportion of autograft ACLR that utilized QT among sports-trained (R=0.739, p=0.023), high experience (R=0.768, p=0.016), and low-volume (R=0.785, p=0.012). Independent drilling (ID) techniques were used in an increasing proportion of ACLR performed by non-sports-trained (R=0.860, p=0.003) and high-volume surgeons (R=0.864, p=0.003). Augmentation of ACLR with concomitant suture augmentation (24, 1.2%) or extra-articular tenodesis (6, 0.3%) was rarely performed ConclusionIn our multi-centered institution, the QT autograft has been increasingly utilized in ACLR by sports-trained, low volume, and high experience surgeons, ID techniques have been increasingly utilized by non-sports-trained and high-volume surgeons Clinical RelevanceSurgeons must stay current with literature that affects their procedures to ensure that evidence-based medicine is being practiced.